The nearly simultaneous invasions of Honduras in 1524 by rival
Spanish expeditions began an era of conflict among rival Spanish
claimants as well as with the indigenous population. The major initial
expeditions were led by Gonz�lez D�vila, who hoped to carve out a
territory for his own rule, and by Crist�bal de Olid, who was
dispatched from Cuba by Cort�s. Once in Honduras, however, Olid
succumbed to personal ambition and attempted to establish his own
independent authority. Word of this reached Cort�s in Mexico, and to
restore his own authority, he ordered yet another expedition, this one
under the command of Francisco de Las Casas. Then, doubting the
trustworthiness of any subordinate, Cort�s set out for Honduras
himself. The situation was further complicated by the entry into
Honduras of expeditions from Guatemala under Pedro de Alvarado and from
Nicaragua under Hernando de Soto.
In the initial struggle for power, Olid seemed to gain the upper
hand, capturing both Gonz�lez D�vila and Las Casas. His captives,
however, having managed to subvert the loyalty of some of Olid's men,
took Olid prisoner, and then promptly beheaded him. Although later
condemned for this action by a Mexican court, none of the conspirators
ever suffered any real punishment.
The arrival of Cort�s in Honduras in 1525 temporarily restored some
order to the Spanish conquest. He established his own authority over the
rival claimants, obtained the submission of numerous indigenous chiefs,
and tried to promote the creation of Spanish towns. His own headquarters
was located at Trujillo on the Caribbean coast. In April 1526, Cort�s
returned to Mexico, and the remaining Spaniards resumed their strife.
Some order was again restored in October of that year when the first
royal governor, Diego L�pez de Salcedo, arrived. L�pez de Salcedo's
policies, however, drove many indigenous people, once pacified by Cort�s,
into open revolt. His attempt to extend his jurisdiction into Nicaragua
resulted in his imprisonment by the authorities there. After agreeing to
a Nicaraguan-imposed definition of the boundary between the two
provinces, L�pez de Salcedo was released but did not return to Honduras
until 1529.
The early 1530s were not prosperous for Honduras. Renewed fighting
among the Spaniards, revolts, and decimation of the settled indigenous
population through disease, mistreatment, and exportation of large
numbers to the Caribbean islands as slaves left the colony on the edge
of collapse by 1534. The Spanish crown renamed the depressed province as
Honduras-Higueras, subdividing it into two districts. Higueras
encompassed the western part while the rest remained known as Honduras.
The decline in population of the province continued, and only the direct
intervention of Pedro de Alvarado from Guatemala in 1536 kept Higueras
from being abandoned. Alvarado was attracted by the prospect of gold in
the region, and, with the help of native Guatemalans who accompanied
him, he soon developed a profitable gold-mining industry centered in the
newly established town of Gracias.
The discovery of gold and silver deposits attracted new settlers and
increased the demand for indigenous labor. The enforced labor, however,
led to renewed resistance by the native people that culminated in a
major uprising in 1537. The leader of the uprising was a capable young
Lenca chieftain known as Lempira (after whom the Honduran national
monetary unit would eventually be named). Lempira established his base
on a fortified hill known as the Pe�ol de Cerqu�n and until 1538
successfully defeated all efforts to subdue him. Inspired by his
examples, other native inhabitants began revolting, and the entire
district of Higueras seemed imperiled. Lempira was ultimately murdered
while negotiating with the Spaniards. After his death, resistance
rapidly disintegrated, although some fighting continued through 1539.
The defeat of Lempira's revolt accelerated the decimation of the
indigenous population. In 1539 an estimated 15,000 native Americans
remained under Spanish control; two years later, there were only 8,000.
Most of these were divided into encomiendas, a system that left
the native people in their villages but placed them under the control of
individual Spanish settlers. Under terms of the encomienda
system, the Spaniards were supposed to provide the indigenous people
with religious instruction and collect tribute from them for the crown.
In return, the Spaniards were entitled to a supposedly limited use of
indigenous labor. As the native population declined, the settlers
exploited those remaining even more ruthlessly. This exploitation led to
a clash between the Spanish settlers and authorities on one side and on
the other side the Roman Catholic Church led by Father Crist�bal de
Pedraza, who, in 1542 became the first bishop of Honduras. Bishop
Pedraza, like others after him, had little success in his efforts to
protect the native people.
Honduras - COLONIAL HONDURAS
For Honduras, the period of federation had been disastrous. Local
rivalries and ideological disputes had produced political chaos and
disrupted the economy. The British had taken advantage of the chaotic
condition to reestablish their control over the Islas de la Bah�a. As a
result, Honduras wasted little time in formally seceding from the
federation once it was free to do so. Independence was declared on
November 15, 1838, and in January 1839, an independent constitution was
formally adopted. Moraz�n then ruled only El Salvador, and in 1839 his
forces there were attacked by a Honduran army commanded by General
Francisco Ferrera. Ferrera was defeated but returned to attack again in
the summer, only to suffer another defeat. The following year, Moraz�n
himself was overthrown, and two years later he was shot in Costa Rica
during a final, futile attempt to restore the United Provinces of
Central America.
For Honduras, the first decades of independence were neither peaceful
nor prosperous. The country's political turmoil attracted the ambitions
of individuals and nations within and outside of Central America. Even
geography contributed to its misfortunes. Alone among the Central
American republics, Honduras had a border with the three potential
rivals for regional hegemony--Guatemala, El Salvador, and Nicaragua. This
situation was exacerbated by the political division throughout the
isthmus between liberals and conservatives. Any liberal or conservative
regime saw a government of the opposite ideology on its borders as a
potential threat. In addition, exiled opposition figures tended to
gather in states whose governments shared their political affiliation
and to use these states as launching pads for efforts to topple their
own governments. For the remainder of the century, Honduras's neighbors
would constantly interfere in its internal politics.
After the fifteen-month interim presidency of Francisco Zelaya Ayes
(1839-40), conservative General Ferrera became independent Honduras's
first elected president. Ferrera's two-year term (1841- 42) was followed
by a five-year period in which he alternately named himself president or
allowed the congress to name an interim president while he maintained
control of the country by holding the post then known as minister of
war. Ferrera's last notable act was the unsuccessful attempt to depose
the liberal Moraz�n as president of El Salvador. In 1847 Ferrera
allowed fellow-conservative Juan Lindo Zelaya to assume the presidency.
Under Lindo's presidency, a new constitution was adopted in 1848, and
some effort was made to promote education, but any effort to make
substantial improvements in the country's situation was doomed by
continuing turmoil.
During Lindo's presidency (1847-52), the British began pressuring
Honduras for the payment of debts and other claims. In 1849 a British
naval force briefly occupied the port of Trujillo, destroying property
and extorting 1,200 pesos from the local government. The following year,
Lindo's own vice president revolted and was prevented from seizing power
only through the military intervention of El Salvador and Nicaragua. All
this turmoil may help to explain why Lindo refused an additional
presidential term and instead turned over power in 1852 to the
opposition liberals, headed by Trinidad Caba�as (1852-55). Three years
later, the conservative government of Guatemala invaded Honduras and
ousted Caba�as, installing in his place the conservative leader, Santos
Guardiola.
The fighting between liberals and conservatives was temporarily set
aside because of the 1855 appearance in Central America of an American
soldier of fortune, William Walker, who established himself as president
of Nicaragua in 1856. Caba�as briefly considered seeking Walker's aid
in attempting to return to power. Instead, armies from all the countries
of Central America joined to oppose Walker, who was forced to abandon
Nicaragua in 1857 and return to the United States.
In 1859 the British agreed to a treaty that recognized Honduran
sovereignty over the Islas de la Bah�a. Some of the British settlers in
the area objected to this transfer and appealed to Walker for help.
Walker evidently thought that his return to Central America would be
welcomed by the Honduran liberals, who were once again trying to oust
Guardiola. Walker landed on the Honduran coast in 1860 but found little
support and encountered determined opposition from both the Hondurans
and the British. He surrendered to the British, who promptly handed him
over to Honduran authorities. A few days later in 1860, he died in front
of a Honduran firing squad.
The return of the Islas de la Bah�a and the death of Walker ended
the immediate threat to Honduran territorial integrity, but other
Central American nations continued to be involved in Honduran internal
affairs. Guardiola was assassinated by his own honor guard in 1862, and
the following decade witnessed the presidency change hands almost twenty
times. General Jos� Mar�a Medina served as president or dictator
eleven times during that period, but Guatemalan intervention in 1876
drove him and his conservative supporters from power.
From 1876 until 1882, liberal president Marco Aurelio Soto governed
Honduras with the support of Guatemalan strongman General Justo Rufino
Barrios. Soto succeeded not only in restoring order but also in
implementing some basic reforms in finance, education, and public
administration. But in 1883, he too fell into disfavor with Barrios and
was forced to resign. His successor, General Luis Borgr�n, survived in
office until 1891 when General Poinciana Leiva (who had ruled briefly
three times from 1873-76) was returned to power in a manipulated
election. Although a liberal, Leiva tried to rule as an absolute
dictator, dissolving the fledgling Liberal Party of Honduras (Partido
Liberal de Honduras--PLH) and deporting its leaders. The result was
another round of civil conflict from which the reconstituted PLH
ultimately emerged victorious. The PLH was led by Policarpo Bonilla,
with the support of Nicaragua's liberal dictator, Jos� Santos Zelaya.
When Bonilla assumed power in 1894, he began to restore a limited
degree of order to the Honduran political scene. Another constitution
was promulgated in 1895, and Bonilla was elected to a four-year term.
Bonilla's administration revised civil codes, improved communications,
and began an effort to resolve the long- standing boundary dispute with
Nicaragua. Bonilla also ensured that in 1899, at the end of his term, he
would be succeeded by his military commander, General Terencio Sierra.
The combined impact of civil strife and foreign interventions had
doomed Honduras to a position of relative economic and social
backwardness throughout the nineteenth century. The country had remained
overwhelmingly rural; Tegucigalpa, Comayagua, and San Pedro Sula were
the only towns of any size. In the early 1850s, the total population was
estimated at 350,000, the overwhelming majority of whom were mestizos.
By 1914 the population had grown to only 562,000.
Opportunities for education and culture were limited at best.
Mid-nineteenth century records indicate that Honduras had no libraries
and no regularly published newspapers. Two universities were maintained,
although their quality was questionable. By the 1870s, only 275 schools,
having approximately 9,000 pupils, existed in the entire country. In
1873-74, the government budgeted only the equivalent of US$720 for
education, a sum designated for the national university.
Throughout the nineteenth century, Hondurans looked to mining as a
means of improving their economic position. The mining industry had
fallen into severe neglect in the first decades of the century, however.
Many mines had been abandoned and flooded. During the years following
independence, efforts to revive the industry were generally frustrating
for both domestic and foreign entrepreneurs. Effort after effort was
abandoned because of civil disturbances, lack of transportation, and
poor health conditions.
Mining was revived somewhat in the 1880s. A key factor in this
revival was the activity of the New York and Honduras Rosario Mining
Company (NYHRMC), which had expanded rapidly and had become a major
economic and political power within Honduras. Owing in part to the
company's efforts, the Honduran government had allowed foreign mining
companies to operate in Honduras with a minimum of restrictions and a
virtual exemption from taxes. By 1889 the company was annually shipping
bullion with a value of over US$700,000 to the United States. Profits
from this operation were extremely high; the company's dividends for the
first half of 1889 totaled US$150,000.
The NYHRMC's success attracted other companies to Honduras, and gold
and silver exports became the principal source of foreign exchange for
the rest of the century. The NYHRMC's success stood alone, however; most
of the nearly 100 other companies were total failures. The Yuscar�n
Mining and Milling Company sold over US$5 million in stock but failed to
begin effective production. By the end of the nineteenth century, the
brief mining boom was in decline, although the NYHRMC would remain a
major factor in the Honduran economy until the mid-twentieth century.
Although mining had provided foreign exchange, the vast majority of
Hondurans gained their livelihoods from agriculture, usually on a
subsistence level. Periodic efforts were made to develop agricultural
exports, but they met with little success. Some tobacco, cattle, and
hides were exported, mostly to neighboring countries. The recurring
civil conflicts and the resultant confiscation of stock by various
military commanders, however, put a damper on efforts to develop the
cattle industry and contributed to its rather backward status. Some
bananas and other fruits were exported from the Islas de la Bah�a, much
of this trade going to New Orleans, but the volume was small and the
benefit for the rest of the nation almost imperceptible.
Honduras - THE RISE OF UNITED STATES INFLUENCE, 1899-1932
Until the early twentieth century, the United States had played only
a very limited role in internal Honduran political clashes. Because
there was not a resident United States minister in Tegucigalpa, the
minister to Guatemala had been accredited for that position. The
presence of the United States in the Caribbean increased following the
Spanish-American War (1898), however. The decision to build a canal
through Panama and expanded commercial activities led to a more active
role for the United States government, as well as for United States
companies.
By 1907 the United States looked with considerable disfavor on the
role Zelaya of Nicaragua was playing in regional affairs. When the
Nicaraguan army entered Honduras in 1907 to overthrow Bonilla, the
United States government, believing that Zelaya wanted to dominate the
entire region, landed marines at Puerto Cort�s to protect the North
American bananas trade. Other United States naval units prevented a
Nicaraguan attack on Bonilla's last position at Amapala in the Golfo de
Fonseca. After negotiations conducted by the United States naval
commander, Manuel Bonilla sought refuge on the U.S.S. Chicago,
and the fighting came to an end. The United States charg� d'affaires in
Tegucigalpa took an active role in arranging a final peace settlement,
with which Zelaya was less than happy. The settlement provided for the
installation of a compromise regime, headed by General Miguel D�vila,
in Tegucigalpa. D�vila was a liberal but was distrusted by Zelaya, who
made a secret arrangement with El Salvador to oust him from office. This
plan failed to reach fruition, but the United States, alarmed by the
threat of renewed conflict in Central America, called the five Central
American presidents to a conference in Washington in November.
The Central American Peace Conference of 1907 made a major effort to
reduce the level of conflict within the region. A Honduran proposal to
reestablish the political union of the Central American states failed to
achieve acceptance, but several other measures were adopted. The five
presidents signed the General Treaty of Peace and Amity of 1907 pledging
themselves to establish the Permanent Central American Court of Justice,
which would resolve future disputes. The treaty also committed the five
countries to restrict the activities of exiles from neighboring states
and provided the basis for legal extraditions. Of special interest was a
United States-sponsored clause that provided for the permanent
neutrality of Honduras in any future Central American conflicts. Another
convention adopted by all five states committed the signers to withhold
recognition from governments that seized power by revolutionary means.
The United States and Mexico, which had acted as cosponsors of the
conference, indicated informally that they would also deny recognition
to such governments. From the point of view of the United States
Department of State, these agreements represented a major step toward
stabilizing Central America in general and Honduras in particular.
The first test of the new treaty involved Honduras. In 1908 opponents
of President D�vila, probably supported by Guatemala and El Salvador,
invaded the country. Nicaragua supported the Honduran president, and war
seemed imminent. Perhaps motivated by the possibility of United States
intervention, however, the parties agreed to submit the dispute to the
new Central American court. The court ultimately rejected the Honduran
and Nicaraguan complaints, but in the meantime the revolt collapsed,
thus briefly restoring peace to Honduras.
Along with fighting off efforts to overthrow him, President D�vila
made some attempts to modernize Honduras. He invited a Chilean officer
to establish a regular military academy, which failed to survive beyond
his time in office. Like his predecessor, D�vila encouraged the
activities of the banana companies. The companies, however, were less
than totally happy with him, viewing his administration as ineffective.
In addition, rivalry among the companies became a factor in Honduran
politics. In 1910 D�vila's administration granted the Vaccaro brothers
a generous rail concession that included a provision prohibiting any
rival line within twenty kilometers. This concession angered Samuel
Zemurray of the newly formed Cuyamel Fruit Company. Zemurray had
encouraged and even helped finance the 1908 invasion and was to continue
to make trouble for the D�vila administration.
Despite the failure of the 1908 uprising, the United States remained
concerned over Honduran instability. The administration of William
Howard Taft saw the huge Honduran debt, over US$120 million, as a
contributing factor to this instability and began efforts to refinance
the largely British debt with provisions for a United States customs
receivership or some similar arrangement. Negotiations were arranged
between Honduran representatives and New York bankers, headed by J.P.
Morgan. By the end of 1909, an agreement had been reached providing for
a reduction in the debt and the issuance of new 5 percent bonds: the
bankers would control the Honduran railroad, and the United States
government would guarantee continued Honduran independence and would
take control of customer revenue.
The terms proposed by the bankers met with considerable opposition in
Honduras, further weakening the D�vila government. A treaty
incorporating the key provisions was finally signed in January 1911 and
submitted to the Honduran legislature by D�vila. However, that body, in
a rare display of independence, rejected it by a vote of thirty-three to
five.
An uprising in 1911 against D�vila interrupted efforts to deal with
the debt problem. The United States stepped in to mediate the conflict,
bringing both sides to a conference on one of its warships. The
revolutionaries, headed by former president Manuel Bonilla, and the
government agreed to a cease-fire and the installation of a provisional
president who would be selected by the United States mediator, Thomas
Dawson. Dawson selected Francisco Bertrand, who promised to hold early,
free elections, and D�vila resigned. The 1912 elections were won by
Manuel Bonilla, but he died after just over a year in office. Bertrand,
who had been his vice president, returned to the presidency and in 1916
won election for a term that lasted until 1920.
The relative stability of the 1911-20 period was difficult to
maintain. Revolutionary intrigues continued throughout the period,
accompanied by constant rumors that one faction or another was being
supported by one of the banana companies. Rivalry among these companies
had escalated in 1910 when the United Fruit Company had entered
Honduras. In 1913 United Fruit established the Tela Railroad Company and
shortly thereafter a similar subsidiary, the Trujillo Railroad Company.
The railroad companies were given huge land subsidies by the Honduran
government for each kilometer of track they constructed. The government
expected that in exchange for land the railroad companies would
ultimately build a national rail system, providing the capital with its
long-sought access to the Caribbean. The banana companies, however, had
other ideas in mind. They used the railroads to open up new banana
lands, rather than to reach existing cities. Through the resultant land
subsidies, they soon came to control the overwhelming share of the best
land along the Caribbean coast. Coastal cities such as La Ceiba, Tela,
and Trujillo and towns further inland such as El Progreso and La Lima
became virtual company towns, and the power of the companies often
exceeded the authority wielded in the region by local governments.
For the next two decades, the United States government was involved
in opposing Central American revolutions whether the revolutions were
supported by foreign governments or by United States companies. During
the 1912-21 period, warships were frequently dispatched to areas of
revolutionary activity, both to protect United States interests and to
exert a dampening effect on the revolutionaries. In 1917 the disputes
among the companies threatened to involve Honduras in a war with
Guatemala. The Cuyamel Fruit Company, supported by the Honduran
government, had begun to extend its rail lines into disputed territory
along the Guatemalan border. The Guatemalans, supported by the United
Fruit Company, sent troops into the area, and it seemed for a time that
war might break out. United States mediation ended the immediate threat,
but the dispute smoldered until 1930 when a second United States
mediation finally produced a settlement.
The development of the banana industry contributed to the beginnings
of organized labor movements in Honduras and to the first major strikes
in the nation's history. The first of these occurred in 1917 against the
Cuyamel Fruit Company. The strike was suppressed by the Honduran
military, but the following year additional labor disturbances occurred
at the Standard Fruit Company's holding in La Ceiba. In 1920 a general
strike hit the Caribbean coast. In response, a United States warship was
dispatched to the area, and the Honduran government began arresting
leaders. When Standard Fruit offered a new wage equivalent to US$1.75
per day, the strike ultimately collapsed. Labor troubles in the banana
area, however, were far from ended.
World War I had a generally negative impact on Honduras. In 1914
banana prices began to fall, and, in addition, the war reduced the
overall amount of agricultural exports. The United States entry into the
war in 1917 diverted ships to the war effort, making imported goods,
such as textiles scarce. The shortages of goods in turn led to
inflation, and the decline in trade reduced government revenues from
tariffs. The banana companies, however, continued to prosper; Standard
Fruit reported earnings of nearly US$2.5 million in 1917. Despite its
problems, Honduras supported the United States war effort and declared
war on Germany in 1918.
Honduras - The Threat of Renewed Instability, 1919-24
In 1919 it became obvious that Bertrand would refuse to allow an open
election to choose his successor. Such a course of action was opposed by
the United States and had little popular support in Honduras. The local
military commander and governor of Tegucigalpa, General Rafael L�pez
Guti�rrez, took the lead in organizing PLH opposition to Bertrand. L�pez
Guti�rrez also solicited support from the liberal government of
Guatemala and even from the conservative regime in Nicaragua. Bertrand,
in turn, sought support from El Salvador. Determined to avoid an
international conflict, the United States, after some hesitation,
offered to meditate the dispute, hinting to the Honduran president that
if he refused the offer, open intervention might follow. Bertrand
promptly resigned and left the country. The United States ambassador
helped arrange the installation of an interim government headed by
Francisco Bogr�n, who promised to hold free elections. However, General
L�pez Guti�rrez, who now effectively controlled the military
situation, made it clear that he was determined to be the next
president. After considerable negotiation and some confusion, a formula
was worked out under which elections were held. L�pez Guti�rrez won
easily in a manipulated election, and in October 1920 he assumed the
presidency.
During Borgr�n's brief time in office, he had agreed to a United
States proposal to invite a United States financial adviser to Honduras.
Arthur N. Young of the Department of State was selected for this task
and began work in Honduras in August 1920, continuing to August 1921.
While there, Young compiled extensive data and made numerous
recommendations, even persuading the Hondurans to hire a New York police
lieutenant to reorganize their police forces. Young's investigations
clearly demonstrated the desperate need for major financial reforms in
Honduras, whose always precarious budgetary situation was considerably
worsened by the renewal of revolutionary activities. In 1919, for
example, the military had spent more than double the amount budgeted for
them, accounting for over 57 percent of all federal expenditures.
Young's recommendations for reducing the military budget, however, found
little favor with the new L�pez Guti�rrez administration, and the
government's financial condition remained a major problem. If anything,
continued uprisings against the government and the threat of a renewed
Central America conflict made the situation even worse. From 1919 to
1924, the Honduran government expended US$7.2 million beyond the amount
covered by the regular budgets for military operations.
From 1920 through 1923, seventeen uprisings or attempted coups in
Honduras contributed to growing United States concern over political
instability in Central America. In August 1922, the presidents of
Honduras, Nicaragua, and El Salvador met on the U.S.S. Tacoma
in the Golfo de Fonseca. Under the watchful eye of the United States
ambassadors to their nations, the presidents pledged to prevent their
territories from being used to promote revolutions against their
neighbors and issued a call for a general meeting of Central American
states in Washington at the end of the year.
The Washington conference concluded in February with the adoption of
the General Treaty of Peace and Amity of 1923, which had eleven
supplemental conventions. The treaty in many ways followed the
provisions of the 1907 treaty. The Central American court was
reorganized, reducing the influence of the various governments over its
membership. The clause providing for withholding recognition of
revolutionary governments was expanded to preclude recognition of any
revolutionary leader, his relatives, or anyone who had been in power six
months before or after such an uprising unless the individual's claim to
power had been ratified by free elections. The governments renewed their
pledges to refrain from aiding revolutionary movements against their
neighbors and to seek peaceful resolutions for all outstanding disputes.
The supplemental conventions covered everything from the promotion of
agriculture to the limitation of armaments. One, which remained
unratified, provided for free trade among all of the states except Costa
Rica. The arms limitation agreement set a ceiling on the size of each
nation's military forces (2,500 men for Honduras) and included a United
States-sponsored pledge to seek foreign assistance in establishing more
professional armed forces.
The October 1923 Honduran presidential elections and the subsequent
political and military conflicts provided the first real tests of these
new treaty arrangements. Under heavy pressure from Washington, L�pez
Guti�rrez allowed an unusually open campaign and election. The
long-fragmented conservatives had reunited in the form of the National
Party of Honduras (Partido Nacional de Honduras--PNH), which ran as its
candidate General Tiburcio Car�as Andino, the governor of the
department of Cort�s. However, the liberal PLH was unable to unite
around a single candidate and split into two dissident groups, one
supporting former president Policarpo Bonilla, the other advancing the
candidacy of Juan Angel Arias. As a result, each candidate failed to
secure a majority. Car�as received the greatest number of votes, with
Bonilla second, and Arias a distant third. By the terms of the Honduran
constitution, this stalemate left the final choice of president up to
the legislature, but that body was unable to obtain a quorum and reach a
decision.
In January 1924, L�pez Guti�rrez announced his intention to remain
in office until new elections could be held, but he repeatedly refused
to specify a date for the elections. Car�as, reportedly with the
support of United Fruit, declared himself president, and an armed
conflict broke out. In February the United States, warning that
recognition would be withheld from anyone coming to power by
revolutionary means, suspended relations with the L�pez Guti�rrez
government for its failure to hold elections.
Conditions rapidly deteriorated in the early months of 1924. On
February 28, a pitched battle took place in La Ceiba between government
troops and rebels. Even the presence of the U.S.S. Denver and
the landing of a force of United States Marines were unable to prevent
widespread looting and arson resulting in over US$2 million in property
damage. Fifty people, including a United States citizen, were killed in
the fighting. In the weeks that followed, additional vessels from the
United States Navy Special Service Squadron were concentrated in
Honduran waters, and landing parties were put ashore at various points
to protect United States interests. One force of marines and sailors was
even dispatched inland to Tegucigalpa to provide additional protection
for the United States legation. Shortly before the arrival of the force,
L�pez Guti�rrez died, and what authority remained with the central
government was being exercised by his cabinet. General Car�as and a
variety of other rebel leaders controlled most of the countryside but
failed to coordinate their activities effectively enough to seize the
capital.
In an effort to end the fighting, the United States government
dispatched Sumner Welles to the port of Amapala; he had instructions to
try to produce a settlement that would bring to power a government
eligible for recognition under the terms of the 1923 treaty.
Negotiations, which were once again held on board a United States
cruiser, lasted from April 23 to April 28. An agreement was worked out
that provided for an interim presidency headed by General Vicente Tosta,
who agreed to appoint a cabinet representing all political factions and
to convene a Constituent Assembly within ninety days to restore
constitutional order. Presidential elections were to be held as soon as
possible, and Tosta promised to refrain from being a candidate. Once in
office, the new president showed signs of reneging on some of his
pledges, especially those related to the appointment of a bipartisan
cabinet. Under heavy pressure from the United States delegation,
however, he ultimately complied with the provisions of the peace
agreement.
Keeping the 1924 elections on track proved to be a difficult task. To
put pressure on Tosta to conduct a fair election, the United States
continued an embargo on arms to Honduras and barred the government from
access to loans--including a requested US$75,000 from the Banco Atl�ntida.
Furthermore, the United States persuaded El Salvador, Guatemala, and
Nicaragua to join in declaring that, under the 1923 treaty provision, no
leader of the recent revolution would be recognized as president for the
coming term. These pressures ultimately helped persuade Car�as to
withdraw his candidacy and also helped ensure the defeat of an uprising
led by General Gregorio Ferrera of the PNH. The PNH nominated Miguel Paz
Barahona (1925-29), a civilian, for president. The PLH, after some
debate, refused to nominate a candidate, and on December 28 Paz Barahona
won virtual unanimous election.
Honduras - The Restoration of Order, 1925-31
Despite growing unrest and severe economic strains, the 1932
presidential elections in Honduras were relatively peaceful and fair.
The peaceful transition of power was surprising because the onset of the
depression had led to the overthrow of governments elsewhere throughout
Latin America, in nations with much stronger democratic traditions than
those of Honduras. Mej�a Colindres, however, resisted pressure from his
own party to manipulate the results to favor the PLH candidate, Angel Z��iga
Huete. As a result, the PNH candidate, Car�as, won the election by a
margin of some 20,000 votes. On November 16, 1932, Car�as assumed
office, beginning what was to be the longest period of continuous rule
by an individual in Honduran history.
Lacking, however, was any immediate indication that the Car�as
administration was destined to survive any longer than most of its
predecessors. Shortly before Car�as's inauguration, dissident liberals,
despite the opposition of Mej�a Colindres, had risen in revolt. Car�as
had taken command of the government forces, obtained arms from El
Salvador, and crushed the uprising in short order. Most of Car�as's
first term in office was devoted to efforts to avoid financial collapse,
improve the military, engage in a limited program of road building, and
lay the foundations for prolonging his own hold on power.
The economic situation remained extremely bad throughout the 1930s.
In addition to the dramatic drop in banana exports caused by the
depression, the fruit industry was further threatened by the outbreak in
1935 of epidemics of Panama disease (a debilitating fungus) and sigatoka
(leaf blight) in the banana-producing areas. Within a year, most of the
country's production was threatened. Large areas, including most of
those around Trujillo, were abandoned, and thousands of Hondurans were
thrown out of work. By 1937 a means of controlling the disease had been
found, but many of the affected areas remained out of production because
a significant share of the market formerly held by Honduras had shifted
to other nations.
Car�as had made efforts to improve the military even before he
became president. Once in office, both his capacity and his motivation
to continue and to expand such improvements increased. He gave special
attention to the fledgling air force, founding the Military Aviation
School in 1934 and arranging for a United States colonel to serve as its
commandant.
As months passed, Car�as moved slowly but steadily to strengthen his
hold on power. He gained the support of the banana companies through
opposition to strikes and other labor disturbances. He strengthened his
position with domestic and foreign financial circles through
conservative economic policies. Even in the height of the depression, he
continued to make regular payments on the Honduran debt, adhering
strictly to the terms of the arrangement with the British bondholders
and also satisfying other creditors. Two small loans were paid off
completely in 1935.
Political controls were instituted slowly under Car�as. The
Communist Party of Honduras (Partido Comunista de Honduras--PCH) was
outlawed, but the PLH continued to function, and even the leaders of a
small uprising in 1935 were later offered free air transportation should
they wish to return to Honduras from their exile abroad. At the end of
1935, however, stressing the need for peace and internal order, Car�as
began to crack down on the opposition press and political activities.
Meanwhile, the PNH, at the president's direction, began a propaganda
campaign stressing that only the continuance of Car�as in office could
give the nation continued peace and order. The constitution, however,
prohibited immediate reelection of presidents.
The method chosen by Car�as to extend his term of office was to call
a constituent assembly that would write a new constitution and select
the individual to serve for the first presidential term under that
document. Except for the president's desire to perpetuate himself in
office, there seemed little reason to alter the nation's basic charter.
Earlier constituent assemblies had written thirteen constitutions (only
ten of which had entered into force), and the latest had been adopted in
1924. The handpicked Constituent Assembly of 1936 incorporated thirty of
the articles of the 1924 document into the 1936 constitution. The major
changes were the elimination of the prohibition on immediate reelection
of a president and vice president and the extension of the presidential
term from four to six years. Other changes included restoration of the
death penalty, reductions in the powers of the legislature, and denial
of citizenship and therefore the right to vote to women. Finally, the
new constitution included an article specifying that the incumbent
president and vice president would remain in office until 1943. But Car�as,
by then a virtual dictator, wanted even more, so in 1939 the
legislature, now completely controlled by the PNH, obediently extended
his term in office by another six years (to 1949).
The PLH and other opponents of the government reacted to these
changes by attempting to overthrow Car�as. Numerous efforts were made
in 1936 and 1937, but all were successful only in further weakening the
PNH's opponents. By the end of the 1930s, the PNH was the only organized
functioning political party in the nation. Numerous opposition leaders
had been imprisoned, and some had reportedly been chained and put to
work in the streets of Tegucigalpa. Others, including the leader of the
PLH, Z��iga Huete, had fled into exile.
During his presidency, Car�as cultivated close relations with his
fellow Central American dictators, generals Jorge Ubico in Guatemala,
Maximiliano Hern�ndez Mart�nez in El Salvador, and Anastasio Somoza
Garc�a in Nicaragua. Relations were particularly close with Ubico, who
helped Car�as reorganize his secret police and also captured and shot
the leader of a Honduran uprising who had made the mistake of crossing
into Guatemalan territory. Relations with Nicaragua were somewhat more
strained as a result of the continuing border dispute, but Car�as and
Somoza managed to keep this dispute under control throughout the 1930s
and 1940s.
The value of these ties became somewhat questionable in 1944 when
popular revolts in Guatemala and El Salvador deposed Ubico and Hern�ndez
Mart�nez. For a time, it seemed as if revolutionary contagion might
spread to Honduras as well. A plot, involving some military officers as
well as opposition civilians, had already been discovered and crushed in
late 1943. In May 1944, a group of women began demonstrating outside of
the Presidential Palace in Tegucigalpa, demanding the release of
political prisoners. Despite strong government measures, tension
continued to grow, and Car�as was ultimately forced to release some
prisoners. This gesture failed to satisfy the opposition, and
antigovernment demonstrations continued to spread. In July several
demonstrators were killed by troops in San Pedro Sula. In October a
group of exiles invaded Honduras from El Salvador but were unsuccessful
in their efforts to topple the government. The military remained loyal,
and Car�as continued in office.
Anxious to curb further disorders in the region, the United States
began to urge Car�as to step aside and allow free elections when his
current term in office expired. Car�as, who by then was in his early
seventies, ultimately yielded to these pressures and announced October
1948 elections, in which he would refrain from being a candidate. He
continued, however, to find ways to use his power. The PNH nominated Car�as's
choice for president--Juan Manuel G�lvez, who had been minister of war
since 1933. Exiled opposition figures were allowed to return to
Honduras, and the PLH, trying to overcome years of inactivity and
division, nominated Z��iga Huete, the same individual whom Car�as had
defeated in 1932. The PLH rapidly became convinced that it had no chance
to win and, charging the government with manipulation of the electoral
process, boycotted the elections. This act gave G�lvez a virtually
unopposed victory, and in January 1949, he assumed the presidency.
Evaluating the Car�as presidency is a difficult task. His tenure in
office provided the nation with a badly needed period of relative peace
and order. The country's fiscal situation improved steadily, education
improved slightly, the road network expanded, and the armed forces were
modernized. At the same time, nascent democratic institutions withered,
opposition and labor activities were suppressed, and national interests
at times were sacrificed to benefit supporters and relatives of Car�as
or major foreign interests.
Once in office, G�lvez demonstrated more independence than had
generally been anticipated. Some policies of the Car�as administration,
such as road building and the development of coffee exports, were
continued and expanded. By 1953 nearly one-quarter of the government's
budget was devoted to road construction. G�lvez also continued most of
the prior administration's fiscal policies, reducing the external debt
and ultimately paying off the last of the British bonds. The fruit
companies continued to receive favorable treatment at the hands of the G�lvez
administration; for example, United Fruit received a highly favorable
twenty-five-year contract in 1949.
Galvez, however, instituted some notable alterations from the
preceding fifteen years. Education received increased attention and
began to receive a larger share of the national budget. Congress
actually passed an income tax law, although enforcement was sporadic at
best. The most obvious change was in the political arena. A considerable
degree of press freedom was restored, the PLH and other groups were
allowed to organize, and even some labor organization was permitted.
Labor also benefited from legislation during this period. Congress
passed, and the president signed, legislation establishing the
eight-hour workday, paid holidays for workers, limited employer
responsibility for work-related injuries, and regulations for the
employment of women and children.
Honduras - Aborted Reform, 1954-63
The relative peace that Honduras had enjoyed for nearly two decades
was shattered by a series of events during 1954, G�lvez's last year in
office. Tension throughout the region had been increasing steadily as a
confrontation developed between the left- leaning government of
President Jacobo Arbenz Guzm�n in Guatemala and the United States. Part
of the confrontation involved the expropriation of United Fruit Company
lands and charges that the Guatemalan government was encouraging
agitation among the banana workers.
In 1952 the United States had begun considering actions to overthrow
the Guatemalan government. Honduras had given asylum to several exiled
opponents of Arbenz, including Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas, but G�lvez
was reluctant to cooperate in direct actions against Guatemala, and the
plans were not activated. By early 1954, however, a major covert
operation against Guatemala was being organized, this time with greater
Honduran cooperation. One reason for the cooperation was the Honduran
government's concern over increased labor tensions in the
banana-producing areas, tensions that the fruit companies blamed, in
part, on Guatemalan influence.
Starting in early May 1954, the tensions escalated to strikes. First,
a series of strikes broke out against United Fruit Company operations on
Honduras's Caribbean coast. Within a few days, the strike spread to
include the Standard Fruit Company operations, bringing the banana
industry in the country to a near standstill. The strikers presented a
wide range of grievances, involving wages, working conditions, medical
benefits, overtime pay, and the right to collective bargaining. Initial
government efforts to end the strike failed, and work stoppages began to
spread into other industries. By May 21, the number of strikers was
approaching 30,000, and the nation's economy was under severe strain.
As the strike was spreading, Honduras was also becoming more deeply
involved in the movement to topple the Arbenz government in Guatemala.
In late May, a military assistance agreement was concluded between the
United States and Honduras, and large quantities of United States arms
were quickly shipped to Honduras. Much of this incoming assistance was
passed on to anti-Arbenz rebels commanded by Castillo Armas. In June
these forces crossed into Guatemala and after several days of political
maneuvering but little actual fighting, Arbenz fled into exile, and
Castillo Armas became president. With the specter of foreign influence
over the strike thus removed, negotiations began, and the strike ended
in early July. Labor leaders who had been accused of having ties with
Guatemala were jailed, and the final settlement, which met few of the
original demands, was signed with elements more acceptable to the
government and the fruit companies than to the workers. Despite the
limited gains, however, the strike did mark a major step toward greater
influence for organized labor in Honduras and a decline in the power of
the fruit companies.
In the midst of these conflicts, the campaign for the 1954 elections
continued. Unhappy with some of G�lvez's gestures toward
liberalization, Car�as, despite his advanced age, decided to run for
president and secured the PNH nomination. This move, however, split the
party, and more moderate members broke away to form the National
Revolutionary Movement (Movimiento Nacional Revolucionario--MNR). Their
nominee was former vice president Abraham Williams Calder�n. The split
in the ruling party encouraged the PLH, who united behind Ram�n Villeda
Morales, a Tegucigalpa physician who was seen as somewhat to the left of
center in the party's political spectrum.
Both the campaign and the election were remarkably free and honest.
On October 10, 1954, approximately 260,000 out of over 400,000 eligible
voters went to the polls. Villeda Morales won a large plurality with
121,213 votes, Car�as received 77,041, and Williams carried 53,041. The
PLH also gained a plurality in the legislature. Under Honduran law,
however, a majority of the total votes was required to be elected
president; Villeda Morales lacked a majority by just over 8,000 votes.
The stage was set for a repeat of the confusing paralysis of 1924
because the constitution required, first, that two-thirds of the members
of the new legislature must be present and vote to choose a president
and, second, that the victor must receive two-thirds of the
legislature's vote. To complicate matters further, G�lvez left for
Miami reportedly to obtain medical treatment although some sources claim
he merely fled the country, leaving the government in the hands of Vice
President Julio Lozano D�az.
Unable to reconcile their differences and unwilling to accept Villeda
Morales as president, the PNH and MNR deputies boycotted the
legislature, producing a national crisis. The constitution provided that
in case of congressional deadlock the Supreme Court of Justice would
select the president. Dominated as the court was by Car�as appointees,
the PLH opposed such a course of action. At this juncture, Lozano D�az
suddenly suspended the legislature and announced that he would act as
president until new elections could be held. He declared that he would
form a national government with cabinet members taken from all major
parties and received pledges of support from all three candidates in the
1954 election. A Council of State, headed by a PLH member but including
members of all three major parties, was appointed to replace the
suspended congress until a constituent assembly could be chosen to write
yet another constitution.
Lozano D�az began his period as president with a broad base of
support that eroded rapidly. He unveiled an ambitious development plan
to be financed by international loans and increased taxes and also
introduced the nation's first labor code. This document guaranteed
workers the right to organize and strike but gave employers the right of
lockout and forbade strikes in public services. The code also embodied
some social welfare and minimum- wage provisions and regulated hours and
working conditions. All these provisions gained him some labor support,
but in later months relations between the president and labor began to
sour.
As time passed, it became clear that Lozano D�az had ambitions to
replace the traditional parties with one that he controlled and could
use to help prolong his hold on power. He reduced the Council of State
to a consultative body, postponed elections, and set about forming his
own party, the National Unity Party (Partido de Unidad Nacional--PUN).
The activities of other parties were limited, and, in July 1956, Villeda
Morales and other PLH leaders were suddenly arrested and flown into
exile. A few weeks later, the government crushed an uprising by 400
troops in the capital. Public opinion, however, was becoming
increasingly hostile to the president, and rumors of his imminent fall
had begun to circulate.
Following the August 1956 uprising, Lozano D�az's health began to
deteriorate, but he clung stubbornly to power. Elections for the
legislature in October were boycotted by most of the opposition, who
charged that the process was openly rigged to favor the president's
supporters. The results seemed to confirm this charge, as the PUN
candidates were declared the winners of all fifty-six seats in the
congress. The joy of their victories was short, however. On October 21,
the armed forces, led by the commanders of the army and air force
academies and by Major Roberto G�lvez, the son of the former president,
ousted Lozano D�az and set up a military junta to rule the country.
This coup marked a turning point in Honduran history. For the first
time, the armed forces had acted as an institution rather than as the
instrument of a political party or of an individual leader. The new
rulers represented younger, more nationalistic, and reform-minded
elements in the military. They were products of the increased
professionalization of the 1940s and 1950s. Most had received some
training by United States military advisers, either in Honduras or
abroad. For decades to come, the military would act as the final arbiter
of Honduran politics.
The military's largest problem was the holding of elections for a
legislature and the selection of a new president. A system of
proportional representation was agreed upon, and elections were held in
October. The PLH won a majority, and in November, by a vote of
thirty-seven to twenty, the assembly selected Villeda Morales as
president for a six-year term beginning January 1, 1958.
The new PLH administration undertook several major efforts to improve
and modernize Honduran life. Funds were obtained from the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) to stabilize the currency and from the World
Bank to begin paving a highway from the Caribbean
coast to the capital. Other efforts were undertaken to expand education.
The greatest attention was devoted to passing a new labor code,
establishing a social security system, and beginning a program of
agrarian reform.
The reform program produced increasing opposition among the more
conservative elements in Honduran society. There were scattered
uprisings during Villeda Morales's initial years in power, but the
military remained loyal and quickly crushed the disturbances. Military
support began to evaporate in the early 1960s, however. Waning military
support was in part a result of rising criticism of the government by
conservative organizations such as the National Federation of
Agriculturists and Stockraisers of Honduras (Federaci�n Nacional de
Agricultores y Ganaderos de Honduras-- Fenagh), which represented the
large landowners. The shift in the military's attitude also reflected
concern over what were viewed as more frequent rural disorder and
growing radical influences in labor and peasant groups. Deteriorating
relations with neighboring states, notably Nicaragua, also contributed
to the tension. The major causes of friction, however, were the
president's 1957 creation of the Civil Guard (Guardia Civil)--a
militarized police commanded directly by the president rather than the
chief of the armed forces--and the prospect of another PLH victory in
the 1963 elections.
The elections were scheduled for October 1963. As in 1954, the PLH
was confronting a divided opposition. The PNH nominated Ram�n Ernesto
Cruz, but a faction split off and ran the son of ex- president Car�as.
The PLH ignored the wishes of their president and nominated Modesto
Rodas Alvarado, a charismatic, highly partisan figure believed to be to
the left of Villeda Morales. All signs pointed to an overwhelming
victory for the PLH, an outcome that the military found increasingly
unpalatable.
Rumors of a coup began circulating in late summer of 1963. The United
States endeavored to make clear its opposition to such action--even
dispatching a high-ranking officer from the United States Southern
Command in the Panama Canal Zone to try to convince the chief of the
armed forces, Air Force Colonel Oswaldo L�pez Arellano, to call off the
coup. Villeda Morales also tried to calm military fears, taking the
carbines away from the Civil Guard and opposing plans for a
constitutional amendment to restore direct command of the military to
the president. All these efforts failed, however. Before dawn on October
3, 1963, the military moved to seize power. The president and the PLH's
1963 presidential candidates were flown into exile, Congress was
dissolved, the constitution was suspended, and the planned elections
were canceled. Colonel L�pez Arellano proclaimed himself president, and
the United States promptly broke diplomatic relations.
Honduras - MILITARY RULE AND INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT, 1963-78
By 1968 the L�pez Arellano regime seemed to be in serious trouble.
The economic situation was producing growing labor conflicts, political
unrest, and even criticism from conservative groups such as Fenagh.
Municipal elections were held in March 1968 to the accompaniment of
violence and charges of open fraud, producing PNH victories but also
fueling public discontent and raising the concern of the United States
Embassy. Efforts at opening up a dialogue were made in mid-1968 but had
little success. Later in the year a general strike was kept brief by
government action that helped break the strike and exiled the leader of
the major Caribbean coast labor federation. Unrest continued, however;
in the spring of 1969 new strikes broke out among teachers and other
groups.
As the political situation deteriorated, the Honduran government and
some private groups came increasingly to place blame for the nation's
economic problems on the approximately 300,000 undocumented Salvadoran
immigrants in Honduras. Fenagh began to associate Salvadoran immigrants
with illegal land invasions, and in January 1969, the Honduran
government refused to renew the 1967 Bilateral Treaty on Immigration
with El Salvador that had been designed to regulate the flow of
individuals across their common border. In April INA announced that it
would begin to expel from their lands those who had acquired property
under agrarian reform without fulfilling the legal requirement that they
be Honduran by birth. Attacks were also launched in the media on the
impact of Salvadoran immigrant labor on unemployment and wages on the
Caribbean coast. By late May, Salvadorans began to stream out of
Honduras back to an overpopulated El Salvador.
Tensions continued to mount during June 1969. The soccer teams of the
two nations were engaged that month in a three-game elimination match as
a preliminary to the World Cup. Disturbances broke out during the first
game in Tegucigalpa, but the situation got considerably worse during the
second match in San Salvador. Honduran fans were roughed up, the
Honduran flag and national anthem were insulted, and the emotions of
both nations became considerably agitated. Actions against Salvadoran
residents in Honduras, including several vice consuls, became
increasingly violent. An unknown number of Salvadorans were killed or
brutalized, and tens of thousands began fleeing the country. The press
of both nations contributed to a growing climate of near- hysteria, and
on June 27, 1969, Honduras broke diplomatic relations with El Salvador.
Early on the morning of July 14, 1969, concerted military action
began in what came to be known as the Soccer War. The Salvadoran air
force attacked targets inside Honduras and the Salvadoran army launched
major offensives along the main road connecting the two nations and
against the Honduran islands in the Golfo de Fonseca. At first, the
Salvadorans made fairly rapid progress. By the evening of July 15, the
Salvadoran army, which was considerably larger and better equipped than
its Honduran opponent, pushed the Honduran army back over eight
kilometers and captured the departmental capital of Nueva Ocotepeque.
Thereafter, the attack bogged down, and the Salvadorans began to
experience fuel and ammunition shortages. A major reason for the fuel
shortage was the action of the Honduran air force, which--in addition to
largely destroying the smaller Salvadoran air force--had severely
damaged El Salvador's oil storage facilities.
The day after the fighting had begun, the OAS met in an urgent
session and called for an immediate cease-fire and a withdrawal of El
Salvador's forces from Honduras. El Salvador resisted the pressures from
the OAS for several days, demanding that Honduras first agree to pay
reparations for the attacks on Salvadoran citizens and guarantee the
safety of those Salvadorans remaining in Honduras. A cease-fire was
arranged on the night of July 18; it took full effect only on July 20.
El Salvador continued until July 29 to resist pressures to withdraw its
troops. Then a combination of pressures led El Salvador to agree to a
withdrawal in the first days of August. Those persuasive pressures
included the possibility of OAS economic sanctions against El Salvador
and the dispatch of OAS observers to Honduras to oversee the security of
Salvadorans remaining in that country. The actual war had lasted just
over four days, but it would take more than a decade to arrive at a
final peace settlement.
The war produced only losses for both sides. Between 60,000 and
130,000 Salvadorans had been forcibly expelled or had fled from
Honduras, producing serious economic disruption in some areas. Trade
between the two nations had been totally disrupted and the border
closed, damaging the economies of both nations and threatening the
future of the Central American Common Market (CACM). Up to 2,000 people,
the majority Honduran civilians, had been killed, and thousands of other
Hondurans in the border area had been made homeless. Airline service
between the two nations was also disrupted for over a decade.
After the war, public support for the military plummeted. Although
the air force had performed well, the army had not. Criticism of the
army was not limited to the public; junior officers were often vocal in
their criticism of superiors, and a rift developed between junior and
senior officers.
The war, however, led to a new sense of Honduran nationalism and
national pride. Tens of thousands of Honduran workers and peasants had
gone to the government to beg for arms to defend their nation. Local
defense committees had sprung up, with thousands of ordinary citizens,
often armed only with machetes, taking over local security duties. This
response to the fighting made a strong impression on a sector of the
officer corps and contributed to an increased concern over national
development and social welfare among the armed forces.
The internal political struggle had been briefly suspended during the
conflict with El Salvador, but by the start of 1970 it was again in full
swing. The government was under pressure to initiate administrative and
electoral reforms, allow open elections in 1971, reorganize the
military, and adopt new economic programs, including a revision of
Honduran relations with the CACM. Labor, peasant, and business
organizations were meeting together in what were known as the fuerzas
vivas (living forces). Their representatives met with L�pez
Arellano and proposed a Plan of National Unity, calling for free
elections, a coalition cabinet, and a division of government posts and
congressional seats. These proposals failed to elicit immediate
response, but discussions continued. Meanwhile, a general political
amnesty was decreed, the creation of the Honduran Christian Democratic
Party (Partido Dem�crata Cristiano de Honduras--PDCH) was announced,
and a decree was issued calling for presidential and congressional
elections on March 28, 1971.
After considerable discussion and debate, the PHL and PNH parties
responded to pressures from labor, business, and the military. On
January 7, 1971, they signed a political pact agreeing to establish a
national-unity government after the March elections. The purposes of the
pact were twofold. The first was to present a single slate of
congressional candidates that would divide the Congress equally between
the PLH and PNH (each party would run its own candidate for the
presidency, however.) The second goal was to promote the Minimum
Government Plan (Plan M�nimo de Gobierno), which included achieving
agrarian reform, increasing technical education, passing a civil service
law, attempting to resolve the conflict with El Salvador, restructuring
the CACM, and reforming government administration. A later agreement
between the parties-- the "little pact"
("pactito")--agreed to a division of government posts,
including those in the Supreme Court of Justice.
The 1971 elections were relatively free and honest. Both parties
offered presidential candidates who were compromise choices of the major
party factions. The PLH ran Jorge Bueso Arias, and the PNH nominated Ram�n
Ernesto Cruz. Most observers anticipated a PLH victory, but the PNH ran
a more aggressive campaign, making use of the mass media and of modern
campaign techniques for the first time in Honduran history. On election
day, Cruz scored an impressive victory, gaining 299,807 votes to 269,989
for Bueso Arias. However, a disturbing note for the PNH was that popular
participation in the election had declined significantly from 1965. Only
slightly over two-thirds of those registered to vote had done so,
although the constitution made voting obligatory.
At first, Cruz appeared to be living up to the terms of the
agreements between the parties. He appointed five PLH members, five PNH
members, and one military officer to his cabinet. L�pez Arellano
remained as chief of the armed forces. As time passed, however, the
split between PLH and PNH widened steadily. In order to deal with the
budget crisis, Cruz pushed through a reluctant Congress a bill that cut
tax benefits and import exemptions. This bill produced opposition from
both business and labor sectors. In the area of agrarian reform, the
president soon removed INA's dynamic director, Roberto Sandoval, and
replaced him with a PNH member, Horacio Moya Posas, who slowed the pace
of reform. The PLH protested this action and also argued that the
appointment of PNH supporters to the Supreme Court of Justice violated
the agreement. Finally, in March 1972, the president dismissed two of
the PLH cabinet members. By mid-1972, the government had lost most of
its non-PNH support.
Honduras - Military Rule and Reform
During the autumn of 1972, with the support of the military, the two
parties attempted to revise the arrangements between the parties and the
major labor and business groups. These efforts were not unsuccessful,
and opposition to what was increasingly perceived as an ineffectual and
divisive administration spread steadily. The virtual halting of agrarian
reform and the killing of several peasants by the military in the
department of Olancho had angered peasant groups. Labor and business
were alienated by the ineffective efforts to deal with the problems of
the economy. The PLH felt that its position within the government was
steadily eroding and that its agreement with the PNH was regularly
violated. In December peasant and labor organizations announced a hunger
march by 20,000 individuals to Tegucigalpa to protest the government's
agrarian policies. Supported by a prior agreement with the labor
movement, the military on December 4, 1972, overthrew Cruz in a
bloodless coup and once again installed L�pez Arellano as the
president.
Problems for the L�pez Arellano regime began to increase in 1974.
The economy was still growing at a slow pace, partly because of the
immense damage caused to the Caribbean coast by Hurricane Fifi in
September 1974. The storm was the most devastating natural disaster in
recent Honduran history, claiming 10,000 or more lives and destroying a
vast number of banana plants. The disaster also increased calls for
agrarian reform.
The government's greatest problem, however, centered on another
aspect of the banana industry. Honduras had joined other bananaexporting
nations in a joint agreement to levy an export tax on that fruit. The
Honduran tax had taken effect in April 1974 but was suddenly canceled
four months later. Shortly thereafter, reports began to circulate that
the United Fruit Company had paid more than US$1 million to Honduran
officials to secure the repeal of the tax. Prominently implicated in
these accusations were L�pez Arellano and his minister of economy and
commerce.
Reacting to these charges on March 31, 1975, the military relieved L�pez
Arellano of his position as chief of the armed forces, replacing him
with Colonel Juan Alberto Melgar Castro. Just over three weeks later,
they completed the process by removing L�pez Arellano from the
presidency and replacing him with Melgar Castro. These decisions had
been made by the increasingly powerful Supreme Council of the Armed
Forces (Consejo Superior de las Fuerzas Armadas--Consuffaa), a group of
approximately twenty to twenty-five key colonels of the armed forces who
provided the institution with a form of collective leadership.
In July 1976 the border with El Salvador was still disputed. In July
a minor upsurge of conflict there brought prompt OAS intervention, which
helped to keep the conflict from escalating. In October both nations
agreed to submit their dispute to arbitration. This development raised
hopes for a rapid peace settlement. Progress, however, proved slow; and
tensions were raised again, briefly, in 1978, when the Honduran
government abruptly canceled all permits for travel to El Salvador. The
rise of guerrilla conflict in El Salvador, plus strong pressures from
other nations, made a settlement increasingly urgent in subsequent
months. In October 1980, with Peruvian mediation, the bilateral General
Peace Treaty was finally signed in Lima, Peru. Trade and travel were
soon resumed, but numerous problems, including final adjudication of
some small parcels of territory along the frontier, remained for later
consideration.
Relations with Nicaragua had also become more difficult, especially
after civil conflict had increased in that nation in the late 1970s. In
March 1978, Honduran soldiers captured Germ�n Pomares, a leader of the
Sandinista National Liberation Front (Frente Sandinista de Liberaci�n
Nacional--FSLN), the guerrilla force fighting against the regime of
Anastasio Somoza Debayle in Nicaragua. Pomares was held until the end of
June, but Nicaraguan requests for extradition were denied, and he was
ultimately flown to Panama. As fighting in Nicaragua escalated in 1978
and early 1979, Honduras found itself in a difficult position. Honduras
did not want to support the unpopular Somoza regime but feared the
Marxist leanings of the FSLN. In addition, beginning in September 1978,
Honduras had become burdened with an ever-growing number of refugees
from Nicaragua.
Honduras - THE RETURN TO CIVILIAN RULE, 1978-82
Melgar Castro's hold on power began to dissolve in 1978. Charges of
government corruption and of military links with narcotics traffic had
become increasingly widespread, leading to accusations that the
government had failed to adequately defend the country. Melgar's hold on
power had weakened because he lacked support among large landowners. In
addition, the Melgar government had seemed to be making little progress
toward promised elections, leading to suspicions that it hoped to
prolong its time in office. Right-wing political forces criticized the
Melgar administration's handling of the Ferrari Case, which involved
drug trafficking and murder of civilians and in which members of the
military had been implicated. Unions and student organizations correctly
interpreted the rightwing 's criticism as a prelude to a coup. When
demonstrators took to the streets to support Melgar, right-wing elements
within the military charged Melgar had lost control of public order and
ousted him. On August 7, 1978, Melgar Castro and his cabinet were
replaced by a three-member junta. Led by General Policarpo Paz Garc�a,
chief of the armed forces, and including the air force commander and the
chief of military security, the junta had close ties to the large
landowners and moved to protect the military men involved in the Ferrari
Case.
From its inception, the government of Paz Garc�a had promised to
return Honduras to civilian rule. In April 1980, the Honduran citizenry
was summoned to the polls to choose delegates for a new Congress. The
Congress would select an interim government and would establish
procedures for presidential and congressional elections in 1981.
Early indications for the 1980 elections pointed toward a victory for
the PNH, headed by Ricardo Z��iga. The PNH appeared more unified and
organized than the rival PLH, and most people assumed that the PNH would
be favored by the ruling military. The PLH suffered from internal
divisions and a lack of leadership. Former president Villeda Morales had
died in 1971, and the party's leader after his death, Modesto Rodas
Alvarado, had died in 1979. A split had developed between the more
conservative followers of Rodas and the party's left wing, which had
formed the Popular Liberal Alliance (Alianza Liberal del Pueblo--Alipo).
In addition, a third party, the Innovation and Unity Party (Partido de
Inovaci�n y Unidad--Pinu) had been registered and was expected to draw
support away from the PLH. The PNH had succeeded in blocking the
inscription of the PDCH, leading the PDCH adherents to join with groups
further to the left in denouncing the elections as a farce and a fraud
and urging popular abstention.
The April 1980 election produced a record registration and voter
turnout. More than 1.2 million Hondurans registered, and
over 1 million voted--over 81 percent of those eligible. The high number
of voters evidently favored the PLH, which won 49.4 percent of the votes
cast. Under a complex apportionment system, the PLH won thirty-five
seats in the Congress; the PNH, thirty-three; and Pinu, three. This
result produced considerable debate over the composition of the next
government. There was general agreement on naming Paz Garc�a as interim
president, and the disputes centered on the composition of the cabinet.
Ultimately, a PLH leader, Roberto Suazo C�rdova, was made president of
the Congress, while the PLH also gained five of the seats on the new
Supreme Court of Justice. The cabinet was divided among all three
parties and the military; the armed forces received the Ministry of
National Defense and Public Security, as well as the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, and the PNH acquired key economic positions.
The Congress took more than a year to draft a new constitution and an
electoral law for the 1981 presidential and congressional elections. The
work went slowly, and the elections originally scheduled for August 1981
had to be postponed until November. In the interim, the National
Elections Tribunal (Tribunal Nacional de Elecciones--TNE) unanimously
granted the PDCH the legal status needed for a place on the 1981 ballot.
Despite the presence of candidates for the Pinu and the PDCH on the
November 1981 ballot, it was clear that the election would be
essentially a two-party affair between the PLH and PNH. On November 29,
1981, a total of 1,214,735 Hondurans, 80.7 percent of those registered,
voted, giving the PLH a sweeping victory. Suazo C�rdova won 636,392
votes (52.4 percent), the PNH 491,089 votes, and 48,582 votes were
divided between the Pinu and the PDCH. The PLH also took control of
Congress, winning forty-four seats; the PNH, thirtyfour ; the Pinu,
three; and the PDCH, one. The PLH also won 61 percent of the municipal
councils. Suazo C�rdova was inaugurated as president of Honduras in
January 1982, ending nearly a decade of military presidents.
Honduras - UNITED STATES AND THE CENTRAL AMERICAN CRISIS
Suazo C�rdova, a country doctor from La Paz, was a veteran of
Honduran political infighting, but he lacked the kind of experience that
might have prepared him for the internationalist role he would play as
president of the republic. His initial approach to the question of
Honduras's role in the growing regional crisis appeared to stress
coexistence rather than confrontation. This approach reflected
Honduras's historical passivity in regional and international affairs
and took into account the regional balance of power, which did not favor
Honduras. As a result, Suazo C�rdova's inaugural speech stressed the
issues of self-determination and the administration's desire to remain
neutral in the face of regional upheaval.
In keeping with this conciliatory approach, on March 23, 1982,
Minister of Foreign Affairs Edgardo Paz Barnica proposed a peace plan to
the permanent council of the OAS. The plan was based on the following
six points: general disarmament in Central America, the reduction of
foreign military and other advisers (then a real point of contention
with the Nicaraguan government), international supervision of any final
agreement, an end to regional arms traffic, respect for delineated and
demarcated borders, and the establishment of a permanent multilateral
dialogue. The proposal met with little support from other Central
American states, particularly Nicaragua.
Gradually, the Suazo C�rdova administration began to perceive the
FSLN (commonly referred to as Sandinista) administration as
obstructionist in regional and international forums, as well as a
subversive force that intended to undermine political stability in
Honduras through intimidation, propaganda, and direct aid to incipient
insurgent groups. The emergence of a consensus on this point within both
the Honduran administration and armed forces coincided with a
significant expansion of the United States role in Honduras, both as
policy adviser and as purveyor of military and economic aid.
Brigadier General Gustavo �lvarez Mart�nez, who assumed the
position of commander of the armed forces in January 1982 emerged as a hardliner against the
Sandinistas. �lvarez publicly declared Honduras "in a war to the
death" with Nicaragua; he believed such a war should be conducted
under the auspices of a triple alliance among Guatemala, El Salvador,
and Honduras. Some observers also believed that �lvarez had another
aspect to his anticommunist strategy, namely covert domestic
surveillance and extralegal executions. �lvarez's training in
Argentina, where such "dirty war" tactics were common in the
1970s, lent some credence to the charges of increased disappearances and
other less extreme forms of harassment against the Honduran left. �lvarez's
main rival for the post of armed forces commander, Colonel Le�nidas
Torres Arias, the former head of military intelligence, had assumed an
attach� post in Buenos Aires, Argentina, after losing the struggle for
command. From Argentina, Torres proceeded to castigate �lvarez in the
media, charging that the general operated a personal death squad. The
Honduran Committee for the Defense of Human Rights appeared to confirm
Torres's charges to some degree by reporting an increase in the number
of political disappearances nationwide. According to foreign observers,
the total numbers in no way rivaled those registered in El Salvador or
Guatemala; the increase, however, was statistically significant for
previously tranquil Honduras.
�lvarez's strong-arm tactics drew criticism from some observers,
particularly the foreign press and international human rights groups. At
the same time, however, leftist subversive activity did expand in the
early 1980s. Much of this increase was attributed directly or indirectly
to Sandinista support for like-minded Honduran groups such as the PCH,
the Lorenzo Zelaya Popular Revolutionary Forces (Fuerzas Populares
Revolucionarias-Lorenzo Zelaya--FPR-LZ), and the Honduran Revolutionary
Party of Central American Workers (Partido Revolucionario de los
Trabajadores Centroamericanos de Honduras--PRTC-H). Beginning with minor
bombings, these groups eventually progressed to kidnappings and
hijackings. The most ambitious effort was
that launched by a platoon-sized unit of Nicaraguan-trained PRTC-H
members who crossed the border from Nicaragua into Olancho department in
September 1983. A rapid response by Honduran troops isolated the PRTC-H
column; twenty- three of the guerrillas surrendered, and another
twenty-six died in the mountains, many of starvation and exposure. A
similar incursion in 1984 also failed to strike a revolutionary spark
among the conservative Honduran peasantry.
The perception of a genuine leftist revolutionary threat to Honduran
stability enhanced Brigadier General �lvarez's power and heightened his
profile both in Honduras and the United States. The resultant appearance
of an imbalance of power between the military and the nascent civilian
government called into question the viability of Honduras's democratic
transition. Some observers saw in �lvarez a continuation in the long
series of military caudillos who had ruled the nation since
independence. A coup and reimposition of direct military rule appeared a
virtual certainty to those who doubted Honduras's affinity for any form
of democratic government. Others, however, pictured �lvarez more in the
mold of Argentina's Juan Per�n--a military-based caudillo who
successfully made the transition to populist civilian politics. Like
most officers, �lvarez had ties to the PNH. �lvarez served as
president of the Association for the Progress of Honduras (Asociaci�n
para el Progreso de Honduras--Aproh), a group made up mainly of
conservative businesspeople and PNH leaders. The initial goals of Aproh
were to attract foreign investment and to block the growth of
"popular organizations" (labor unions, campesino groups, and
other activist groups) such as those that supported the FMLN in El
Salvador. Aproh's acceptance of funding from the South Korea-based
Unification Church proved controversial and generated negative publicity
for both the organization and for �lvarez. The general's purportedly
popular following, moreover, was suspect. He seemed much more
comfortable and adept at high-level political maneuvering than at
grassroots organization. Eventually, even his support within the armed
forces proved to be inadequate to sustain his ambitions.
Although �lvarez had appeared ascendant by 1982, some observers
described the political situation in Honduras as a triumvirate:
Brigadier General �lvarez formulating national security policy and
refraining from a direct military takeover of the government; President
Suazo supporting �lvarez's policies in return for military tolerance of
his rule and military support for his domestic policies; and the United
States government providing the economic and military aid that helped
sustain the arrangement. Some disputed the claim that Suazo was
subservient to the military by pointing out the fact that the president
refused to increase the budget of the armed forces. That budget,
however, failed to take foreign military aid into account. The increase
in United States military aid from US$3.3 million in fiscal year (FY) 1980 to US$31.3 million in FY 1982, therefore, represented a
substantial expansion in the military's role in government.
�lvarez strongly supported United States policy in Central America.
He reportedly assisted in the initial formation of the Nicaraguan
Resistance (more commonly known as the Contras, short for contrarevolucionarios--counterrevolutionaries
in Spanish), arranged large-scale joint exercises with United States
forces, and agreed to allow the training of Salvadoran troops by United
States special forces at a facility near Puerto Castilla known as the
Regional Center for Military Training (Centro Regional de Entrenamiento
Militar--CREM). The latter action
eventually contributed greatly to �lvarez's ouster in early 1984.
The other major factor in the �lvarez ouster was the general's
attempt to streamline the command structure of the armed forces.
Traditionally, a collegial board made up of field-grade officers
consulted with the commander in the formulation of policy for the
Honduran armed forces. �lvarez proposed to eliminate this organization,
the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (Consejo Superior de las Fuerzas
Armadas--Consuffaa), and to replace it with a board of eight senior
officers. The reorganization would have concentrated and enhanced �lvarez's
power over the military by allowing him to name his most trusted
commanders to a leadership board that would rubber-stamp his policy
proposals. At the same time, the reorganization had promised to make the
armed forces function more efficiently, an important consideration if
hostilities broke out between Honduras and Nicaragua.
Alvarez's view on involvement in Nicaragua led directly to the 1984
rebellion by his officers. Most observers had expected Honduras to serve
as one staging area for a United States military intervention in
Nicaragua if such an operation took place. The flawed but successful
Operation Urgent Fury on the Caribbean island of Grenada in November
1983 had seemed to increase the likelihood of military action against
the Sandinista regime in Nicaragua. Although �lvarez supported a
military solution to the "Nicaraguan problem," a significant
faction of the Honduran officer corps held divergent convictions. These
more nationalistic, more isolationist officers saw �lvarez as
subservient to the United States, giving up more in terms of sovereignty
than he received in aid. These officers also resented �lvarez's
posturing in the media and his apparent aspirations to national
leadership. On a more mundane level, certain officers also feared that
�lvarez would force them out after he had solidified his power base
within the officer corps. The prospect of early, involuntary retirement,
with its attendant loss of licit and illicit income, prompted a clique
of senior officers to move against �lvarez on March 31, 1984, seizing
him and dispatching him on a flight to Miami.
The ouster of �lvarez produced a number of repercussions both in
Honduran domestic politics and in Honduran-United States relations. The
armed forces, which had appeared to be moving in a more activist and
outward-looking direction under �lvarez, assumed a more isolationist
stance toward regional relations and United States policy initiatives.
Air Force Brigadier General Walter L�pez Reyes, the new commander in
chief, demanded further increases in military aid in return for Honduran
cooperation in regional affairs. After some equivocation, L�pez closed
the CREM. He also scaled back Honduran-United States military exercises.
On May 21, 1985, President Suazo C�rdova and United States President
Ronald W. Reagan signed a joint communiqu� that amended a 1982 annex to
the 1954 Military Assistance Agreement between the two countries.
Although the new accord allowed the United States to expand and improve
its temporary facilities at Palmerola Air Base near Comayagua, it
generally limited Honduran cooperation in comparison to the terms of the
1982 annex.
By 1984 the armed forces under L�pez began to exert pressure on the
United States-backed Contra forces, the bulk of which operated from
bases in the southern departments of El Para�so and Olancho. Honduran
foreign minister Edgardo Paz Barnica reflected the new attitude toward
the Contras in January 1985, when he announced that the government
planned to expel them from Honduras. Although that statement reflected
bravado and frustration more than reality, the Honduran military took
more active steps to pressure both the Contras and, indirectly, the
United States government. In February 1985, the armed forces ordered the
Contras to close a hospital that they had set up outside of Tegucigalpa.
The Hondurans also ordered the Contras to shut down an office that had
been used to receive official visitors, mainly from the United States.
Around the same time, Honduran troops turned back two United States
Department of State employees from a planned visit to a Contra training
camp; the troops told the Americans that they lacked a newly required
permit to enter the area.
Honduras - The Nicaraguan Conflict
The forced departure of Brigadier General �lvarez on March 31, 1984,
and his succession by a group of officers who demonstrated less interest
in political affairs than he had markedly changed the political
situation prevailing in the country. President Suazo C�rdova,
previously restrained by his trepidations concerning lvarez, began to
show signs of becoming a caudillo. Although the constitution forbade his
reelection, Suazo C�rdova conspired to nominate for the 1985
presidential elections Oscar Mej�a Arellano, a fellow Rodista (the PLH
faction founded by Modesto Rodas Alvarado). Every politician in Honduras
recognized the octogenarian Mej�a for what he was, namely someone who
would perpetuate Suazo's control of the Presidential Palace.
Nevertheless, Suazo C�rdova went about promoting Mej�a's candidacy
with every power at his disposal.
The potential key to a Mej�a victory lay in the makeup of the
Supreme Court of Justice, which could (under terms of the 1981
constitution) decide an election in which each candidate failed to
receive a clear majority. As 1985 began, the Supreme Court contained a
firm majority of Suazo C�rdova supporters. The leadership of the
Congress, both PLH and PNH, recognized the self-serving scenario that
Suazo C�rdova had set up. Moreover, they realized that the constitution
granted power to the legislature to remove Supreme Court justices for
cause. The Congress proceeded to do just that when fifty-three of its
eighty-two deputies voted on March 29, 1985, to replace five of nine
justices because of their alleged corruption. Five new justices quickly
took the oath of office.
During the debate over the justices's corruption, Suazo C�rdova had
fulminated both publicly and privately, threatening to declare a state
of emergency and close the Congress if the five lost their seats on the
court. Although he stopped short of fulfilling that threat, troops did
surround the Congress building temporarily after the deputies announced
their action. Furthermore, military police took into custody Ram�n
Valladares Soto, the new president of the Supreme Court. Arrests of the
four new other justices followed. A lower court judge charged the five
with treason. On April 1, the judge filed treason charges against
fifty-three legislative deputies who had voted to replace the five
justices. The proceedings against the fifty-three, if pursued to its
culmination, threatened to result in the revocation of legislators'
legal immunity from prosecution.
The Congress rapidly reacted to Suazo's counterattack. On April 3,
1985, the assembly passed by a forty-nine to twenty-nine vote a motion
censuring the president for his actions. In another action more
calculated to curb the president's power, the legislature passed a bill
establishing guidelines for primary elections within political parties.
Had such guidelines been in place previously, the entire governmental
crisis might have been avoided. Not surprisingly, Suazo C�rdova vetoed
the bill almost two weeks later, the day after the Rodista faction had
endorsed his choice, Mej�a, as the official presidential candidate of
the PLH.
The resolution of the crisis demonstrated how little Honduras had
progressed from the days when the military had guided events either
directly or indirectly. During the early April days of the dispute
between Suazo C�rdova and the Congress, Brigadier General L�pez had
publicly declared himself and the armed forces neutral. As events began
to degenerate, however, the officer corps moved to reconcile the
antagonists. At first, the military sought to resolve the dispute
through informal contacts. When that failed, the armed forces convened
direct negotiations between presidential and legislative
representatives, with military arbiters. By April 21, the talks produced
an agreement. The leaders of Congress rescinded their dismissal of the
five justices and dropped their demand for primary elections. Supreme
Court President Valladares received his freedom. In a complicated
arrangement, it was agreed that candidates of all political factions
could run for president. The winner of the election would be the faction
that received the most votes within the party (PLH, PNH, or other) that
received the most total votes. The arrangement conveniently ignored the
provision of the constitution stating that the president must be the
candidate who receives a simple majority of the popular vote. Publicly,
all parties expressed approval of the outcome. Although threatened union
strike action had influenced the negotiations, the strongest factor in
their outcome had been pressure from the armed forces leadership.
The unorthodox nature of the agreed-upon electoral procedures delayed
adoption of new regulations until late in November. By that time, four
PLH candidates, three PNH candidates, and several other minor party
candidates had filed. The campaign appeared to pit two PLH
candidates--Mej�a and San Pedro Sula engineer Jos� Azcona
Hoyo--against the PNH's Rafael Leonardo Callejas Romero in a contest
that saw the two PLH candidates criticize each other as much as, or more
than, they did their opposition outside of their own party. The final
vote count, announced on December 23, produced the result that the
makeshift electoral regulations had made all but inevitable--a president
who garnered less than a majority of the total popular vote. The
declared winner, Azcona, boasted less than 30 percent of the vote, as
opposed to Callejas's 44 percent. But because the combined total of PLH
candidates equaled 54 percent, Azcona claimed the presidential sash.
Callejas lodged a protest, but it was short-lived and probably
represented less than a sincere effort to challenge the agreement
brokered by the military.
Azcona faced multiple national and regional problems as his
inauguration took place on January 27, 1986. The new president's
inaugural address noted the country's many social problems, but promised
"no magic formulas" to solve them. He also noted the growing
national debt and promised to adhere to foreign policies guided by the
principle of nonintervention. Azcona's prospects for a successful
presidency appeared dim, partly because his party's bloc in the Congress
was still splintered, unlike the more united PNH deputies on the other
side of the aisle. Beyond such parochial concerns, the crisis in Central
America still raged on, presenting a daunting prospect for any Honduran
leader.
Honduras - FROM CONTADORA TO ESQUIPULAS
Honduras has three distinct topographical regions: an extensive
interior highland area and two narrow coastal lowlands. The interior,
which constitutes approximately 80 percent of the country's terrain, is
mountainous. The larger Caribbean lowlands in the north and the Pacific
lowlands bordering the Golfo de Fonseca are characterized by alluvial
plains.
Interior Highlands
The interior highlands are the most prominent feature of Honduran
topography. Composing approximately 80 percent of the country's total
area, these mountain areas are home to the majority of the population.
Because the rugged terrain has made the land difficult to traverse and
equally difficult to cultivate, this area has not been highly developed.
The soil here is poor; Honduras lacks the rich volcanic ash found in
other Central American countries. Until the early part of the twentieth
century, the highlands economy consisted primarily of mining and
livestock.
In the west, Honduras's mountains blend into the mountain ranges of
Guatemala. The western mountains have the highest peaks, with the Pico
Congol�n at an elevation of 2,500 meters and the Cerro de Las Minas at
2,850 meters. These mountains are woodland covered with mainly pine
forests.
In the east, the mountains merge with those in Nicaragua. Although
generally not as high as the mountains near the Guatemalan border, the
eastern ranges possess some high peaks, such as the Monta�a de la Flor
at 2,300 meters, El Boquer�n (Monte El Boquer�n) at 2,485 meters, and
Pico Bonito at 2,435 meters.
One of the most prominent features of the interior highlands is a
depression that runs from the Caribbean Sea to the Golfo de Fonseca.
This depression splits the country's cordilleras into eastern and
western parts and provides a relatively easy transportation route across
the isthmus. Widest at its northern end near San Pedro Sula, the
depression narrows as it follows the upper course of the R�o Humuya.
Passing first through Comayagua and then through narrow passes south of
the city, the depression widens again as it runs along the border of El
Salvador into the Golfo de Fonseca.
Scattered throughout the interior highlands are numerous flatfloored
valleys, 300 to 900 meters in elevation, which vary in size. The floors
of the large valleys provide sufficient grass, shrubs, and dry woodland
to support livestock and, in some cases, commercial agriculture.
Subsistence agriculture has been relegated to the slopes of the valleys,
with the limitations of small-sized holdings, primitive technology, and
low productivity that traditionally accompany hillside cultivation.
Villages and towns, including the capital, Tegucigalpa, are tucked in
the larger valleys.
Vegetation in the interior highlands is varied. Much of the western,
southern, and central mountains are open woodland-- supporting pine
forest interspersed with some oak, scrub, and grassy clearings. The
ranges toward the east are primarily continuous areas of dense,
broad-leaf evergreen forest. Around the highest peaks, remnants of dense
rain forest that formerly covered much of the area are still found.
Honduras - The Caribbean Lowlands
The vast majority of the rural-to-urban population shift has been the
result of migration from the southwestern departments (Ocotepeque,
Lempira, Intibuc�, La Paz, and Valle) to cities in the departments on
or near the Caribbean coast (Cort�s, Yoro, Atl�ntida, and Col�n) and
to Tegucigalpa (in Francisco Moraz�n department in the central
highlands). During the earlier part of the twentieth century, employment
opportunities in the newly established banana plantations attracted many
people from southern and western Honduras to the Caribbean coast. Cities
on the banks of the R�o Ul�a, especially El Progreso, experienced
impressive growth as a result of this migration from the south.
Migration from the mountainous southwest sparked tremendous development
in the city of San Pedro Sula. The search for employment also led many
to Tegucigalpa, even though the capital has never been a center for
industry or agriculture.
Demographers have predicted that, unless significant social and
economic reforms are instituted, the rural-to-urban migration trend so
prevalent in the twentieth century not only will continue but also will
probably increase. Although Honduras is still primarily an agrarian
society, urban centers have grown considerably since the 1920s. Analysts
speculate that urban centers will continue to expand as a result of
internal migration and national population growth.
In the second half of the twentieth century, Tegucigalpa in
particular experienced sharp increases in its population. During the
1950s, Tegucigalpa's population increased nearly 75 percent. The
following decade brought a population rate increase of more than 80
percent. In 1980 Tegucigalpa had a population of 400,000. By 1989 the
population had soared to 576,661. This increase in population has
practically crippled the already fragile infrastructure of the city.
Housing is woefully inadequate, and a large percentage of the residents
either lack running water altogether or receive inadequate amounts.
During the period between 1950 and 1980, San Pedro Sula had a
population growth rate that exceeded that of Tegucigalpa. In the 1980s,
the annual growth rate dropped somewhat and was less than that of
Tegucigalpa (3.7 percent and 4.4 percent, respectively). In 1988 the
population of San Pedro Sula stood at 287,350. Whereas San Pedro Sula
has dealt more successfully with its population growth, it is
nonetheless challenged to meet the housing, services, and employment
needs of new inhabitants.
Other urban centers experiencing a high population growth rate are La
Ceiba, on the Caribbean, and El Progreso, in the agricultural valley of
the R�o Ul�a. La Ceiba is the third-largest city in Honduras. In 1988
it had a population of 68,764 and an annual population growth rate of
3.2 percent. El Progreso is the country's fourth-largest city. The 1988
population of this city was 60,058 and the annual growth rate 4.5
percent. The populations of both La Ceiba and El Progreso are expected
to exceed 100,000 by the year 2000.
The majority of migrants in Honduras are very young, ranging from
their teens to their early twenties. Most male migrants gravitate toward
developing agricultural areas, especially the Caribbean coast. Because
women traditionally have a more limited choice of employment, their
occupational skills are similarly limited. Among the many incentives for
their migration are escape from economic hardship, as well as escape
from marriage and childbearing at a very young age. The majority of
women migrants seek domestic employment or work as street vendors in
urban areas. In the early 1990s, an increasing number of women have been
seeking employment in the maquiladoras, or assembly factories.
Many others become prostitutes. Male urban migrants seek jobs in artisan
shops, with merchants, and as laborers. Employment opportunities for the
new migrants remain spotty, however, as the industrial and commercial
sectors in Honduras have not created enough jobs to absorb the
population coming from the rural areas.
Honduras.
During the twentieth century, the corporatist system of politics that
has emerged has eased the intensity of the demands placed on the state
by the rural and urban poor. The relative openness of Honduran politics
and the degree of legitimacy given to working class demands have
resulted in a system in which the organizations representing lower
sectors of society can be highly organized and even militant without
calling for the overthrow of the system itself. This militancy has made
organized labor a political force since the 1950s and has resulted in
many labor reforms. Peasant militancy, for example, has made possible
the agrarian reform movement. According to some analysts, Honduras has
achieved a level of political organization on the part of labor unions
and peasant organizations that remains unparalleled in most of Central
America. Reform has been uneven, however, and political
and social reform movements stagnated in the 1970s and 1980s. In the
early 1990s, the central problems of poverty and underdevelopment
remained pervasive.
The military's participation in Honduran politics has been, in one
sense, the action of another interest group. The military in Honduras has not emerged as an
organization for the sons of the elite, as has been the case in most of
Latin America, but rather as an organization that cuts across economic
and class lines. This fact has meant a greater divergence of purpose and
interests between the traditional Honduran elite and the armed forces.
The decision-making structure within the military also allows for a
degree of dissent within the organization, resulting in less resistance
to social reforms.
The relatively open political discourse found in Honduras is aided by
the ability of other social institutions to take advantage of the
country's freedom of expression. Although in general the Honduran press
tends toward conservative positions, it is free of direct government
control. Control of the press is exercised more through
cooptation than by censorship. Several independent radio stations are
powerful forces in Honduras, a country that has a high illiteracy rate.
The independent position of the National Autonomous University of
Honduras (Universidad Nacional Aut�noma de Honduras--UNAH), which as a
rule holds liberal positions, also contributes to the variety of
opinions that can be heard.
The Honduran Roman Catholic Church also has been a force pressing for
social change and reform, although its role has varied and, in many
instances, has been contradictory throughout the years. The role of the
church as advocate for change gained ground in the late 1960s after
Vatican Council II. The church's role gathered momentum after the
meeting of the Latin American Conference of Bishops in Medell�n,
Colombia in 1968. The Roman Catholic Church in Honduras came to hold the
view that its members should become active agents of social change. In
Honduras, foreign clergy in particular played a major role in social
activism. By the 1970s, the Roman Catholic Church in Honduras had come
to be perceived as radical, and in 1971 various Roman Catholic Church
organizations joined with those of the Christian Democratic Movement of
Honduras (Movimiento Dem�crata Cristiano de Honduras-- MDCH) to form
the Coordinating Council for Development (Consejo Coordinador de
Desarrollo--Concorde). The impact of this activism was felt down to the
parish level.
Differences of opinion emerged within the Roman Catholic Church in
the late 1970s, however, regarding its approach to social change.
Certain orders of clergy, particularly the Jesuits (Society of Jesus)
and various priests, advocated even greater activism than the church
hierarchy supported. The hierarchy's opposition to further change was
evident when it withdrew Roman Catholic organizations from the Concorde.
As Central America took central stage in the Cold War in the 1970s and
1980s because of events in Nicaragua and El Salvador, activist priests
were accused of being communists. Tensions between the church's
hierarchy and activist priests eased in the 1990s, however, with the
decline of insurgency in the area.
Increased political conservatism and repression during the 1980s
resulted in the emergence of a great number of grass-roots
organizations. Along with labor unions and peasant organizations, the
emerging groups advocated vigilance concerning human rights and exerted
pressure on the authorities to reveal the whereabouts of disappeared
citizens.
These new grass-roots groups, as well as the press, the UNAH, and the
Roman Catholic Church, all contributed to the preservation of a
political system with relative freedom of expression. The attempts at
reform initiated by these groups, however, have not met with complete
success. Although the government and military have at times opted for
compromise in the face of reform demands, the organizations have also
had to endure periods of threatened and real repression.
Honduras - The Upper Class
The family is the fundamental social unit in Honduras, providing a
bulwark in the midst of political upheavals and economic reversals.
People emphasize the trust, the assistance, and the solidarity that kin
owe to one another. Family loyalty is an ingrained and unquestioned
virtue; from early childhood, individuals learn that relatives are to be
trusted and relied on, whereas those outside the family are, implicitly
at least, suspect. In all areas of life and at every level of society, a
person looks to family and kin for both social identity and assistance.
In general, the extent to which families interact, and the people
with whom they interact, depends on their degree of prosperity. Families
with relatively equal resources share and cooperate. Where there is
marked disparity in the wealth of various branches of a family, the more
prosperous branches try to limit the demands made by the poorer ones. On
the one hand, generosity is held in high esteem, and failure to care for
kin in need is disparaged; but, on the other hand, families prefer to
help their immediate relatives and to bestow favors on those who are
able to reciprocate. A needy relative might receive the loan of a piece
of land, some wage labor, or occasional gifts of food. Another type of
assistance is a form of adoption by which poorer families give a child
to more affluent relatives to raise. The adopting family is expected to
care for the child and to see that he or she receives a proper
upbringing. The children, however, are frequently little better than
unpaid domestic help. Implicit in the arrangement is the understanding
that the child's biological family, too, will receive assistance from
the adopting family.
Kinship serves as metaphor for relations of trust in general. Where a
kin tie is lacking, or where individuals wish to reinforce one, a
relationship of compadrazgo is often established. Those so
linked are compadres (co-parents or godparents). In common with
much of Latin America, strong emotional bonds link compadres. Compadres
use the formal usted instead of t� in addressing one
another, even if they are kin. Sexual relations between compadres
are regarded as incestuous. Compadres are commonly chosen at
baptism and marriage, but the relationship extends to the two sets of
parents. The tie between the two sets of parents is expected to be
strong and enduring. Any breach of trust merits the strongest community
censure.
There are three accepted forms of marriage: civil, religious, and
free unions. Both serial monogamy and polygamous unions are socially
accepted. Annulment is difficult to obtain through the Roman Catholic
Church; this fact, in addition to the expense involved, makes couples
reluctant to undertake a religious marriage. Civil marriage is
relatively common. Divorce in this case is relatively easy and
uncomplicated. Marriage forms also reflect the individual's life cycle.
Most opt for free unions when they are younger and then settle into more
formal marriages as they grow older and enjoy more economic security.
Class also plays a role: religious marriage is favored by middle-class
and upper-class groups; thus, it signifies higher socioeconomic status.
The ideal marriage for most Hondurans involves a formal engagement and
religious wedding, followed by an elaborate fiesta.
No shame accrues to the man who fathers many children and maintains
several women as mistresses. Public disapproval follows only if the man
fails to assume the role of "head of the family" and to
support his children. When a free union dissolves, a woman typically
receives only the house that she and her mate inhabited. The children
receive support only if they have been legally recognized by their
father.
Families are usually more stable in the countryside. Since the
partners are usually residing in the midst of their kin, a man cannot
desert his wife without disrupting his work relationship with her
family. A woman enjoys greater leverage when she can rely on her family
to assist if a union fails or when she owns her own land and thus has a
measure of financial independence.
In keeping with the tradition of machismo, males usually play a
dominant role within the family, and they receive the deference due to
the head of the household. There is wide variation in practice, however.
Where a man is absent, has limited economic assets, or is simply
unassertive, a woman assumes the role of head of the family.
Sex role differentiation begins early: young boys are allowed to run
about unclothed, while girls are much more carefully groomed and
dressed. Bands of boys play unwatched; girls are carefully chaperoned.
Girls are expected to be quiet and helpful; boys enjoy much greater
freedom, and they are given considerable latitude in their behavior.
Boys and men are expected to have premarital and extramarital sexual
adventures. Men expect, however, that their brides be virgins. Parents
go to considerable lengths to shelter their daughters in order to
protect their chances of making a favorable marriage.
Parent-child relationships are markedly different depending on the
sex of the parent. Mothers openly display affection for their children;
the mother-child tie is virtually inviolate. Father-child relationships
vary more depending on the family. Ideally, the father is an authority
figure to be obeyed and respected; however, fathers are typically more
removed from daily family affairs than mothers.
Honduras - LIVING CONDITIONS
Rural Life
Because Honduras has traditionally been an agrarian country and, in
spite of rapid rates of urban growth, is still one of the least
urbanized countries of Central America, conditions of life in the
countryside are a major concern. Rural residents are farmers, although
about 60 percent of Honduran land remains forested and only 25 percent
of the total is available for agriculture or pastureland. A vast
majority of rural dwellers are small farmers who till their own plots or
landless laborers who work for wages on estates or smaller farms. Many
peasants with plots of their own also seek part-time wage labor to
supplement their incomes. In a typical case, a man may work his father's
land, rent additional land of his own, and do occasional day labor.
The trend toward small farms in marginal areas increased rapidly
after 1960 as the population increased explosively. Because land
inheritance among the peasantry is divided among all the sons, a farmer
with six manzanas (one manzana equals approximately
0.7 hectare) of land and six sons would have only one manzana
of land for each child to work as his own as an adult. In addition,
escalating land prices have increasingly forced small farmers to migrate
to more and more marginal land because of population pressure and the
rapid development of commercial agriculture and livestock estates since
World War II. The steepness of the marginal mountain slopes, however,
often makes agriculture impossible or at least extremely difficult. It
is estimated that almost 90 percent of the mountainous area of Honduras
has slopes with gradients that range from marginal for agriculture to
those that do not permit agriculture or even decent pasturage.
Obviously, small farmers attempting to cultivate the mountainsides have
a difficult task.
Deterioration of the mountain environment, poor productivity, and
crop losses result in poverty for small farmers. Soil erosion and the
loss of soil fertility is caused by the marginality of the available
slopes and the methods used in farming. Cultivation techniques are
slash-and-mulch or slash-and-burn employing simple tools, such as
machetes, hoes, axes, digging sticks, and possibly wooden plows, without
the use of fertilizer. The rudimentary storage facilities of most farm
households also contribute to the loss of a sizable percentage of crops
to rodents and pests.
Most of the rural population live in one- or two-room thatchroofed
huts (bahareques) built of adobe or sugarcane stalks and mud
with dirt floors. As plantation agriculture and livestock raising have
increased, many peasants have found it increasingly difficult to find a
plot of land suitable for a house. Many who formerly lived on the edges
of larger estates found themselves forced off the land by enclosure, or
the fencing off of private property. Consequently, there is much
"fence housing" in Honduras, in which a squatter and his
family, squeezed off land by the development of plantation crops, live
in a tiny hut in the narrow space between a public road and the
landowner's fence.
Poor food productivity and low incomes lead to a very low standard of
living in the countryside, where illness and poor diets are endemic. The
typical diet of the rural population consists of corn--by far the
primary staple and most widely planted crop--made into tortillas,
beans--the main source of protein--cassava, plantains, rice, and coffee,
with only occasional supplements of meat or fish. Although pigs and
chickens are widely raised (each rural household usually has a few),
meat is infrequent in most rural diets, as are green vegetables. Given
the nature of the typical diet and the fact that food production has
been insufficient for the country's needs, widespread malnutrition
complicates the population's fragile health. Population growth
exacerbates the problem, creating a vicious cycle of more mouths to be
fed, yet lower agricultural productivity, as well as transportation and
distribution difficulties.
Indeed, a general attitude has evolved in which most of the affected
population has related few of its health problems to their real causes,
such as malnutrition and environmental hazards. Instead, given a state
of affairs where, for example, there is not a dramatic shortage of food
but only a continuously inadequate diet, the population fails to relate
infectious diseases, mental retardation, and low productivity to
conditions of poor diet and lack of sanitation. Because these problems
have always existed for the affected population, they tend to be
accepted as normal.
Honduras - Urban Life
After Honduras achieved independence from Spain in the early
nineteenth century, its economic growth became closely related to its
ability to develop attractive export products. During much of the
nineteenth century, the Honduran economy languished; traditional cattle
raising and subsistence agriculture produced no suitable major export.
In the latter part of the century, economic activity quickened with the
development of large-scale, preciousmetal mining. The most important
mines were located in the mountains near the capital of Tegucigalpa and
were owned by the New York and Honduras Rosario Mining Company (NYHRMC).
Silver was the principal metal extracted, accounting for about 55
percent of exports in the 1880s. Mining income stimulated commercial and
ancillary enterprises, built some infrastructure, and reduced monetary
restraints on trade. Other beneficial economic effects were few,
however, because the mining industry was never well integrated into the
rest of the Honduran economy. The foreign mining companies employed a
small work force, provided little or no government revenue, and relied
mostly on imported mining equipment.
Honduras's international economic activity surged in the early
twentieth century. Between 1913 and 1929, its agricultural exports rose
from US$3 million (US$2 million from bananas) to US$25 million (US$21
million from bananas). These "golden" exports were supported
by more than US$40 million of specialized banana company investment in
the Honduran infrastructure and were safeguarded by United States
pressure on the national government when the companies felt threatened.
The overall performance of the Honduran economy remained closely tied
to banana prices and production from the 1920s until after the
mid-century because other forms of commercial export agriculture were
slow to emerge. In addition, until drastically reduced in the mid-1950s,
the work force associated with banana cultivation represented a
significant proportion of the wage earners in the country. Just before
the banana industry's largest strike in 1954, approximately 35,000
workers held jobs on the banana plantations of the United Fruit Company
(later United Brands Company, then Chiquita Brands International) or the
Standard Fruit Company (later brought by Castle and Cook, then Dole Food
Company).
After 1950 Honduran governments encouraged agricultural modernization
and export diversification by spending heavily on transportation and
communications infrastructure, agricultural credit, and technical
assistance. During the 1950s--as a result of these improvements and the
strong international export prices-- beef, cotton, and coffee became
significant export products for the first time. Honduran sugar, timber,
and tobacco also were exported, and by 1960 bananas had declined to a
more modest share (45 percent) of total exports. During the 1960s,
industrial growth was stimulated by the establishment of the Central
American Common Market (CACM--see Appendix B). As a result of the
reduction of regional trade barriers and the construction of a high
common external tariff, some Honduran manufactured products, such as
soaps, sold successfully in other Central American countries. Because of
the greater size and relative efficiency of the Salvadoran and
Guatemalan industrial sectors, however, Honduras bought far more
manufactured products from its neighbors than it sold to them. After the
1969 Soccer War with El Salvador, Honduras effectively withdrew from the
CACM. Favorable bilateral trade arrangements between Honduras and the
other former CACM partners were subsequently negotiated, however.
A political shift in the 1980s had strong and unexpected
repercussions on the country's economic condition. Beginning in late
1979, as insurgency spread in neighboring countries, Honduran military
leaders enthusiastically came to support United States policies in the
region. This alignment resulted in financial support that benefited the
civilian as well as the military ministries and agencies of Honduras.
Honduran defense spending rose throughout the 1980s until it consumed 20
to 30 percent of the national budget. Before the military buildup began in fiscal year (FY) 1980, United States military assistance to Honduras was less
than US$4 million. Military aid more than doubled to reach just under
US$9 million by FY 1981, surged to more than US$31 million by FY 1982,
and stood at US$48.3 million in FY 1983. Tiny Honduras soon became the
tenth largest recipient of United States assistance aid; total economic
and military aid rose to more than US$200 million in 1985 and remained
at more than US$100 million for the rest of the 1980s.
The increasing dependence of the Honduran economy on foreign aid was
aggravated by a severe, regionwide economic decline during the 1980s. Private investment plummeted in 1980, and capital
flight for that year was US$500 million. To make matters worse, coffee
prices plunged on the international market in the mid-1980s and remained
low throughout the decade. In 1993 average annual per capita income
remained depressingly low at about US$580, and 75 percent of the
population was poor by internationally defined standards.
Traditionally, Honduran economic hopes have been pinned on land and
agricultural commodities. Despite those hopes, however, usable land has
always been severely limited. Honduras's mostly mountainous terrain
confines agriculturally exploitable land to narrow bands along the
coasts and to some previously fertile but now largely depleted valleys.
The country's once abundant forest resources have also been dramatically
reduced, and Honduras has not derived economically significant income
from mineral resources since the nineteenth century. Similarly,
Honduras's industrial sector never was fully developed. The heady days
of the CACM (midto -late 1960s), which produced an industrial boom for
El Salvador and Guatemala, barely touched the Honduran economy except to
increase its imports because of the comparative advantages enjoyed by
the Salvadoran and Guatemalan economies and Honduras's inability to
compete.
Bananas and coffee have also proven unreliable sources of income.
Although bananas are less subject to the vagaries of international
markets than coffee, natural disasters such as Hurricane Fifi in 1974,
drought, and disease have appeared with a regular, albeit random,
frequency to take their economic toll through severely diminished
harvests. Moreover, bananas are grown and marketed mostly by
international corporations, which keep the bulk of wealth generated.
Coffee exports, equally unreliable as a major source of economic
support, surpassed bananas in the mid1970s as Honduras's leading export
income earner, but international price declines coupled with huge fiscal
deficits underlined the vulnerability of coffee as an economic base.
As Honduras entered the 1990s, it did have some factors working in
its favor--relative peace and a stronger civilian government with less
military interference in the politics and economy of the country than in
past years. The country was hobbled, however, by horrendous foreign
debt, could claim only diminished natural resources, and had one of the
fastest growing and urbanizing populations in the world. The
government's daunting task then became how to create an economic base
able to compensate for the withdrawal of much United States assistance
without becoming solely dependent on traditional agricultural exports.
In the 1990s, bananas were booming again, particularly as new
European trade agreements increased market size. Small bananaproducing
cooperatives lined up in the 1990s to sell their land to the commercial
giants, and the last banana-producing lands held by the government were
privatized. Like most of Central America, Honduras in the 1990s began to
woo foreign investors, mostly Asian clothing assembly firms, and it held
high hopes for revenue to be generated by privatizing national
industries. With one of the most strikeprone labor forces in Central
America, debt-burdened and aging industrial assets, and a dramatically
underdeveloped infrastructure, Honduras, however, has distinct economic
disadvantages relative to its Central American and Caribbean neighbors,
who compete with Honduras in the same export markets.
Honduras - MACROECONOMIC TRENDS
Recent Growth
Honduran president Rafael Leonardo Callejas Romero, elected in
November 1989, enjoyed little success in the early part of his
administration as he attempted to adhere to a standard economic
austerity package prescribed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
and the World Bank. As the November 1993 presidential elections drew
closer, the political fallout of austere economic measures made their
implementation even less likely. Any hope for his party's winning the
1993 election was predicated on improving social programs, addressing
employment needs, and appeasing a disgruntled, vocal public sector.
However, reaching those goals required policies that moved away from
balancing the budget, lowering inflation, and reducing the deficit and
external debt to attract investment and stimulate economic growth.
Callejas inherited an economic mess. The economy had deteriorated
rapidly, starting in 1989, as the United States Agency for International
Development (AID) pointedly interrupted disbursements of its grants to
Honduras to signal displeasure with the economic policies of the old
government and to push the new government to make economic reforms.
Nondisbursal of those funds greatly exacerbated the country's economic
problems. Funds from the multilateral lending institutions, which
eventually would help fill the gap left by the reduction of United
States aid, were still under negotiation in 1989 and would be
conditioned first on payment of arrears on the country's enormous
external debt.
Between 1983 and 1985, the government of Honduras--pumped up by
massive infusions of external borrowing--had introduced expensive,
high-tech infrastructure projects. The construction of roads and dams,
financed mostly by multilateral loans and grants, was intended to
generate employment to compensate for the impact of the regionwide
recession. In reality, the development projects served to swell the
ranks of public-sector employment and line the pockets of a small elite.
The projects never sparked private-sector investment or created
substantial private employment. Instead, per capita income continued to
fall as Honduras's external debt doubled. Even greater injections of
foreign assistance between 1985 and 1988 kept the economy afloat, but it
soon became clear that the successive governments had been borrowing
time as well as money.
Foreign aid between 1985 and 1989 represented about 4.6 percent of
the gross domestic product (GDP). About 44 percent of the government's
fiscal shortfall was financed through cash from foreign sources. Side
effects of the cash infusion were that the national currency, the
lempira became overvalued and the amount of exports dropped. A booming
public sector, with its enhanced ability to import, was enough to keep
the economy showing growth, based on private consumption and government
spending. But the government did little to address the historical,
underlying structural problems of the economy--its overdependence on too
few traditional commodities and lack of investment. Unemployment
mushroomed, and private investment withered.
By 1989 President Callejas's broad economic goal became to return
Honduran economic growth to 1960-80 levels. During the decades of the
1960s and 1970s, the country's economy, spurred mostly by erratically
fluctuating traditional agricultural commodities, nevertheless averaged
real annual growth of between 4 and 5 percent. At the end of the 1980s,
however, Callejas had few remaining vehicles with which to pull the
country out of the deep regionwide recession of the 1980s. Real growth
between 1989 and 1993 translated to mostly negative or small positive
per capita changes in the GDP for a population that was growing at close
to 4 percent annually.
President Callejas attempted to adhere to conditions of desperately
needed new loans. Cutting the size of the public sector work force,
lowering the deficit, and enhancing revenues from taxes--as mandated by
the multilateral lending institutions--were consistently his biggest
stumbling blocks. Despite his all-out effort to reduce the public-sector
deficit, the overall ratio of fiscal deficit to the GDP in 1990 showed
little change from that in 1989. The total public-sector deficit
actually grew to 8.6 percent of the GDP, or nearly L1 billion, in 1991.
The 1993 deficit expanded to 10.6 percent of the GDP. The Honduran
government's medium-term economic objectives, as dictated by the IMF,
were to have generated real GDP growth of 3.5 percent by 1992 and 4
percent by 1993. In fact, GDP growth was 3.3 percent in 1991, 5.6
percent in 1992, and an estimated 3.7 percent in 1993. The economy had
operated so long on an ad hoc basis that it lacked the tools to
implement coherent economic objectives. Solving the most immediate
crisis frequently took precedence over long-term goals.
Inflation
By 1991 President Callejas had achieved modest success in controlling
inflation. Overall inflation for 1990 had reached 36.4 percent--not the
hyperinflation experienced by some Latin American counties--but still
the highest annual rate for Honduras in forty years. The Honduran
government and the IMF had set an inflation target of 12 percent for
1992 and 8 percent for 1993. The actual figures were 8.8 percent in 1992
and an estimated 10.7 percent for 1993. Hondurans had been accustomed to
low inflation (3.4 percent in 1985, rising to 4.5 percent by the end of
1986), partly because pegging the lempira to the dollar linked
Honduras's inflation rate to inflation rates in developed countries. But
the expectation for low inflation made the reality of high inflation
that much worse and created additional pressures on the government for
action when inflation soared in 1990.
Unemployment
Between 1980 and 1983, 20 percent of the work force was
unemployed--double the percentage of the late 1970s. Job creation
remained substantially behind the growth of the labor force throughout
the 1980s. Unemployment grew to 25 percent by 1985, and combined
unemployment and underemployment jumped to 40 percent in 1989. By 1993,
50 to 60 percent of the Honduran labor force was estimated to be either
underemployed or unemployed.
The government's acceptance of foreign aid during the 1980s, in lieu
of economic growth sparked by private investment, allowed it to ignore
the necessity of creating new jobs. Honduras's GDP showed reasonable
growth throughout most of the 1980s, especially when compared to the
rest of Latin America, but it was artificially buoyed by private
consumption and public-sector spending.
Mainstay agricultural jobs became scarcer in the late 1970s. Coffee
harvests and plantings in border area decreased because fighting in
neighboring Nicaragua and El Salvador spilled over into Honduran. Other
factors contributing to the job scarcity were limited land, a reluctance
on the part of coffee growers to invest while wars destabilized the
region, and a lack of credit. Small farmers became increasingly unable
to support themselves as their parcels of land diminished in size and
productivity.
Problems in the agricultural sector have fueled urbanization. The
Honduran population was 77 percent rural in 1960. By 1992 only 55
percent of the Honduran population continued to live in rural areas. Campesinos have flocked to the cities
in search of work but found little there. Overall unemployment has been
exacerbated by an influx of refugees from the wars in neighboring
countries, attracted to Honduras, ironically, by its relatively low
population density and relative peace. In the agricultural sector (which
in 1993 still accounted for approximately 60 percent of the labor
force), unemployment has been estimated to be far worse than the figures
for the total labor force.
Honduran urban employment in the early 1990s has been characterized
by underemployment and marginal informal-sector jobs, as thousands of
former agricultural workers and refugees have moved to the cities
seeking better lives. Few new jobs have been generated in the formal
sector, however, because domestic private sector and foreign investment
has dropped and coveted public-sector jobs have been reserved mostly for
the small Honduran middle-class with political or military connections.
Only one of ten Honduran workers was securely employed in the formal
sector in 1991.
In the mid-1980s, the World Bank reported that only 10,000 new jobs
were created annually; the low rate of job creation resulted in 20,000
people being added to the ranks of the unemployed every year. The actual
disparity between jobs needed for full employment and new jobs created
exceeded that projection, however. For those with jobs, the buying power
of their wages tumbled throughout the 1980s while the cost of basic
goods, especially food, climbed precipitously.
Honduras - The Economy - ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
Composition of Labor Force
Honduras suffers from an overabundance of unskilled and uneducated
laborers. Most Honduran workers in 1993 continued to be employed in
agriculture, which accounted for about 60 percent of the labor force.
More than half of the rural population, moreover, remains landless and
heavily dependent on diminishing seasonal labor and low wages.
Fifty-five percent of the farming population subsists on less than two
hectares and earns less than US$70 per capita per year from those plots,
mostly by growing subsistence food crops.
In 1993 only about 9 to 13 percent of the Honduran labor force was
engaged in the country's tiny manufacturing sector--one of the smallest
in Central America. Skilled laborers are scarce. Only 25,000 people per
year, of which about 21 percent are industrial workers, graduate yearly
from the National Institute of Professional Training (Instituto Nacional
de Formaci�n Profesional- -INFOP) established in 1972.
Hundreds of small manufacturing firms, the traditional backbone of
Honduran enterprise, began to go out of business beginning in the early
1990s, as import costs rose and competition through increasing wages for
skilled labor from the mostly Asian-owned assembly industries
strengthened. The small Honduran shops, most of which had manufactured
clothing or food products for the domestic market, traditionally
received little support in the form of credit from the government or the
private sector and were more like artisans than conventional
manufacturers. Asian-owned export assembly firms (maquiladoras),
operating mostly in free zones established by the government on the
Caribbean coast, attract thousands of job seekers and swell the
populations of new city centers such as San Pedro Sula, Tela, and La
Ceiba. Those firms employed approximately 16,000 workers in 1991.
About one-third of the Honduran labor force was estimated to be
working in the service or "other" sector in 1993. That
classification usually means that a person ekes out a precarious
livelihood in the urban informal sector or as a poorly paid domestic. As
unemployment soared throughout Central America in the 1980s, more and
more people were forced to rely on their own ingenuity in order to
simply exist on the fringes of Honduran society.
Employment Indicators and Benefits
Honduran governments have set minimum wages since 1974, but
enforcement has generally been lax. That laxity increased at the
beginning of the 1980s. Traditionally, most Honduran workers have not
been covered by social security, welfare, or minimum wages.
Multinational companies usually paid more than the standard minimum
wage, but, overall, the Honduran wage earner has experienced a
diminution of real wages and purchasing ability for more than a decade.
When they occurred, minimum wage adjustments generally did not keep up
with cost of living increases. After a major currency devaluation in
1990, average Honduran workers were among the most poorly paid workers
in the Western Hemisphere. By contrast, the banana companies paid
relatively high wages as early as the 1970s. Banana workers continued at
the top of the wage scale in the 1990s; however, in the 1980s, as banana
production became less laborintensive , the companies had decreased
their investment and work force. Consequently, fewer workers were
employed as relatively well-paid agricultural wage earners with related
benefits.
President Callejas responded to the severe poverty by implementing a
specially financed Honduran Social Investment Fund (Fondo Hondure�o de
Inversi�n Social--FHIS) in 1990. The fund created public works programs
such as road maintenance and provided United States surplus food to
mothers and infants. Many Hondurans slipped through that fragile social
safety net, however. As a continuing part of the social pact, and even
more as the result of a fierce union-government battle, President
Callejas announced in 1991 a 27.8 percent increase over a minimum wage
that the government had earlier agreed upon. That increase was in
addition to raises of 50 and 22 percent set, respectively, in January
and September 1990. Despite those concessions, the minimum daily rate in
1991 was only US$1.75 for workers employed by small agricultural
enterprises and US$3.15 for workers in the big exporting concerns; most
workers did not earn the minimum wage.
Labor Unions
Honduras has long been heavily unionized. In 1993 approximately 15 to
20 percent of the overall formal work force was represented by some type
of union, and about 40 percent of urban workers were union members.
There were forty-eight strikes in the public sector alone in 1990,
protesting the government's economic austerity program and layoffs of
public-sector workers. More than 4,000 public-sector employees from the
Ministry of Communications, Public Works, and Transport were fired in
1990. About 70,000 unionized workers remained in the faltering public
sector in the beginning of 1991. However, the government largely made
good its pledge to trim that number by 8,000 to 10,000 throughout 1991
as part of its austerity program.
In the private sector, 1990 saw ninety-four strikes in sixtyfour
firms as workers fought for wage increases to combat inflation. A
forty-two-day strike at the Tela Railroad Company (owned by Chiquita
Brands International--formerly United Brands and United Fruit Company)
was unsuccessful, however, and that defeat temporarily ended union
efforts at direct confrontation.
In 1993 Honduras had three major labor confederations: the
Confederation of Honduran Workers (Confederaci�n de Trabajadores de
Honduras--CTH), claiming a membership of about 160,000 workers; the
General Workers' Central (Central General de Trabajadores--CGT),
claiming to represent 120,000 members; and the Unitary Confederation of
Honduran Workers (Confederaci�n Unitaria de Trabajadores de
Honduras--CUTH), a new confederation formed in May 1992, with an
estimated membership of about 30,000. The three confederations included
numerous trade union federations, individual unions, and peasant
organizations.
The CTH, the nation's largest trade confederation, was formed in 1964
by the nation's largest peasant organization, the National Association
of Honduran Peasants (Asociaci�n Nacional de Campesinos de
Honduras--Anach), and by Honduran unions affiliated with the
Inter-American Regional Organization of Workers (Organizaci�n Regional
Interamericana de Trabajadores--ORIT), a hemispheric labor organization
with close ties to the American Federation of LaborCongress of
Industrial Organization (AFL-CIO). In the early 1990s, the confederation
had three major components: the 45,000-member Federation of Unions of
National Workers of Honduras (Federaci�n Sindical de Trabajadores
Nacionales de Honduras--Fesitranh); the 22,000 member Central Federation
of Honduran Free Trade Unions (Federaci�n Central de Sindicatos Libres
de Honduras); and the 2,200-member Federation of National Maritime
Unions of Honduras (Federaci�n de Sindicales Mar�timas Nacionales de
Honduras). In addition, Anach, claiming to represent between 60,000 and
80,000 members, was affiliated with Fesitranh. Fesitranh was by far the
country's most powerful labor federation, with most of its unions
located in San Pedro Sula and the Puerto Cort�s Free Zone. The unions
of the United States-owned banana companies and the United States-owned
petroleum refinery also were affiliated with Fesitranh. The CTH received
support from foreign labor organizations, including ORIT, the American
Institute for Free Labor Development (AIFLD), and Germany's Friedreich
Ebert Foundation and was an affiliate of the International Confederation
of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU).
Although it was not legally recognized until 1982, the CGT was
originally formed in 1970 by the Christian Democrats and received
external support from the World Confederation of Labor (WCL) and the
Latin American Workers Central (Central Latinoamericana de
Trabajadores--CLAT), a regional organization supported by Christian
Democratic parties. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, however, the CGT
leadership developed close ties to the National Party of Honduras
(Partido Nacional de Honduaras--PNH), and several leaders served in the
Callejas government. Another national peasant organization, the National
Union of Peasants (Uni�n Nacional de Campesinos--UNC), claiming a
membership of 40,000, was affiliated with the CGT for many years and was
a principal force within the confederation.
The CUTH was formed in May 1992 by two principal labor federations,
the Unitary Federation of Honduran Workers (Federaci�n Unitaria de
Trabajadores de Honduras--FUTH) and the Independent Federation of
Honduran Workers (Federaci�n Independiente de Trabajadores de
Honduras--FITH), as well as several smaller labor groups, all critical
of the Callejas government's neoliberal economic reform program.
The Marxist FUTH, with an estimated 16,000 members in the early
1990s, was first organized in 1980 by three communist-influenced unions,
but did not receive legal status until 1988. The federation had external
ties with the World Federation of Trade Unions (WFTU), the Permanent
Congress for Latin American Workers Trade Union Unity (Congreso
Permanente de Unidad Sindical de Trabajadores de Am�rica
Latina--CPUSTAL), and the Central American Committee of Trade Union
Unity (Comit� de Unidad Sindical de Centroam�rica--CUSCA). Its
affiliations included water utility, university, electricity company,
brewery, and teacher unions, as well as several peasant organizations,
including the National Central of Farm Workers (Central Nacional de
Trabajadores del Campo--CNTC), formed in 1985 and active in land
occupations in the early 1980s.
FUTH also became affiliated with a number of leftist popular
organizations in a group known as the Coordinating Committee of Popular
Organizations (Comit� Coordinadora de las Organizaciones
Populares--CCOP) that was formed in 1984. Dissident FUTH member formed
the FITH, which was granted legal status in 1988. The FITH consisted of
fourteen unions claiming about 13,000 members in the early 1990s.
Honduras - AGRICULTURE
IN LATE 1993, HONDURAS was again in the midst of an electoral
campaign to elect a president, deputies to the National Congress, and
municipal officials nationwide. The November 1993 elections were the
third since the military turned the nation over to a democratically
elected president in January 1982. Regular national elections, which
have come to be celebrated in an almost holidaylike atmosphere, appear
to be institutionalized. For most of this century, the Honduran
political system has had two dominant traditional parties, the Liberal
Party of Honduras (Partido Liberal de Honduras--PLH) and the National
Party of Honduras (Partido Nacional de Honduras--PNH). In the 1980s, the
PLH captured the presidency in the 1981 and 1985 elections, choosing
Roberto Suazo C�rdova and Jos� Azcona Hoyo, respectively; in 1989, the
PNH was victorious, with Rafael Leonardo Callejas Romero assuming the
presidency.
The Honduran military has been a powerful force in domestic politics
since the 1950s. From 1963 until 1971, and again from 1972 until 1982,
the military essentially controlled the national government, often with
support from the PNH. In the 1980s, after the country had returned to
civilian rule, the military continued to be a potent political force,
particularly during the Suazo C�rdova government (1981-85). During that
administration, the military allowed a United States military presence
and hosted members of the Nicaraguan Resistance (more commonly known as
the Contras,
short for contrarevolucionarios--Spanish for
counterrevolutionaries; see Glossary), a group attempting to overthrow
the Nicaraguan government. In the early 1990s, the Honduran military
continued to operate as an autonomous institution with increasing
involvement in economic activities.
Within the civilian government, the executive branch of government
has traditionally dominated the legislative and judicial branches. The
Honduran judiciary has been widely criticized for politicization and for
having unqualified judges among the lower court officials. The justice
system for the most part has not held military or civilian elites
accountable for their actions. A significant departure from this record
was the July 1993 conviction of two military officers for the 1991
murder of an eighteen-year- old high school student, Riccy Mabel Mart�nez.
The case galvanized Honduran public opinion against the military's
immunity from prosecution. The political system also suffers from the
endemic corruption found within its ranks; bribery is an almost
institutionalized practice.
In the early 1990s, a myriad of interest groups influenced the
Honduran political process. Despite the nation's political tradition of
a strong executive branch, an elaborate network of interest groups and
political organizations has thrived and at times has helped settle
conflicts. The Honduran labor movement has traditionally been one of the
strongest in Central America. The nation's organized peasant movement
helped bring about limited agrarian reform in the early 1960s and 1970s.
Nevertheless, some critics maintain that in the early 1990s the
government increasingly intervened in the affairs of labor unions and
peasant organizations, including through the introduction of
"parallel unions," government sponsored unions that had little
worker support. In the 1980s and 1990s, a variety of special interest
organizations and associations were active in Honduras, including
student and women's groups, human rights organizations, and
environmental groups.
In the foreign policy arena, Honduras in the early 1990s was just
emerging from a decade of regional turbulence marked by civil conflicts
in neighboring El Salvador and Nicaragua. Honduras had become a linchpin
for United States policy toward Central America in the 1980s. It hosted
the United States-supported anti-Sandinista Contra force as well as a
1,100-troop United States military force at Palmerola Air Base (renamed
the Enrique Cano Soto Air Base in 1988). Military exercises involving
thousands of United States troops and National Guardsmen were conducted
in the country, many involving roadbuilding projects; and Honduras
received almost US$1.6 billion in United States assistance during the
decade. In the early 1990s, however, with the end to the Contra conflict
in Nicaragua and a peace accord in El Salvador, Honduras's relations
with the United States changed considerably. Aid levels fell
dramatically, and military assistance slowed to a trickle. The United
States became more willing to criticize Honduras for its human rights
record and urged Honduras to cut back its military spending. As in the
past, however, the United States remained Honduras's most important
trading partner and its most important source of foreign investment.
Amidst the waning of civil conflict in the region in the early 1990s,
Honduras and the other Central American states turned their efforts to
regional integration, particularly economic integration. In 1990 the
Central American presidents signed a Central American Economic Action
Plan (Plan de Acci�n Econ�mica de Centroam�rica-- Paeca), which
included economic integration commitments and guidelines. In 1993 they
established a regional integration governing body, the Central American
Integration System (Sistema de Integraci�n Centroamericana--Sica). As a
first step toward political integration, the Central American Parliament
(Parlamento Centroamericano--Parlacen) was inaugurated in 1991; however,
as of 1993 only Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador--the so-called
northern triangle states--had elected representatives to that body. In
September 1992, Honduras's long-time border conflict with El Salvador
was resolved when the International Court of Justice (ICJ) awarded
Honduras approximately two-thirds of the disputed territory. Both
nations agreed to accept the ruling, which was viewed by many as a
victory for Honduras.
<>THE CONSTITUTION
The Honduran constitution, the sixteenth since independence from
Spain, entered into force on January 20, 1982. Just a week before,
Honduras had ended ten years of military rule with the inauguration of
civilian president Roberto Suazo C�rdova. The constitution was
completed on January 11, 1982, by a seventy-one-seat Constituent
Assembly that had been elected on April 20, 1980, under the military
junta of Policarpo Paz Garc�a. The Constituent Assembly was dominated
by Honduras's two major political parties, the PLH, which held
thirty-five seats, and the PNH, which held thirty-three seats. The small
Innovation and Unity Party (Partido de Inovaci�n y Unidad--Pinu) held
the remaining three seats.
Honduran constitutions are generally held to have little bearing on
Honduran political reality because they are considered aspirations or
ideals rather than legal instruments of a working government. The
constitution essentially provides for the separation of powers among the
three branches of government, but in practice the executive branch
generally dominates both the legislative and judicial branches of
government. Moreover, according to the United States Department of
State's human rights report for 1992, although basic human rights are
protected in the constitution, in practice the government has been
unable to assure that many violations are fully investigated, or that
most of the perpetrators, either military or civilian, are brought to
justice.
Of the nation's fifteen previous constitutions, several have marked
significant milestones in the nation's political development. The first
constitution, in 1825, which reflected strong Spanish influence,
established three branches of government. The 1839 constitution, which
emphasized the protection of individual rights, was the nation's first
outside the framework of the United Provinces of Central America;
Honduras had just declared independence from the federation in October
1838. In the 1865 constitution, the right of habeas corpus was
constitutionally guaranteed for the first time. The 1880 constitution
introduced many new features to the Honduran political system, including
the principle of municipal autonomy and the state's role in promoting
economic development. Separation of church and state was also an
important feature, as previous constitutions had proclaimed Roman
Catholicism as the state's official religion.
Promulgated under the presidency of Policarpo Bonilla V�squez
(1894-99), the 1894 constitution--the nation's ninth--was considered the
most progressive in its time. It abolished the death penalty and
elevated the status of laws covering the press, elections, and amparo, laws that granted protection to claims in litigation.
Although many provisions of the 1894 constitution were ignored, the
document served as a model for future constitutions. The 1924
constitution introduced new social and labor provisions and attempted to
make the legislature a stronger institution vis-�-vis the executive
branch. With the 1936 constitution, which was promulgated under the
dictatorship of Tiburcio Car�as Andino (1933-49), the powers of the
executive were again reinforced, and the presidential and legislative
terms of office were extended from four to six years. Some observers
maintain that the 1936 constitution was amended on numerous occasions to
serve the needs of the Cariato, as the dictatorship came to be known.
The 1957 constitution, promulgated under the presidency of Ram�n
Villeda Morales (1958-63), introduced a number of new features,
including labor provisions (influenced by the growth of trade unionism
after the banana strike of 1954) and the establishment of a body to
regulate the electoral process. The 1965 constitution, the nation's
fifteenth, was promulgated under the military rule of Colonel Osvaldo L�pez
Arellano (1963-71, 1972-73) and remained in force until 1982, through
the brief civilian presidency of Ram�n Ernesto Cruz (1971-72) and
through ten more years of military rule.
The 1982 constitution provides for many of the governmental
institutions and processes inherited from previous decades. Throughout
the constitution, however, new or changed provisions help distinguish it
from previous constitutions, and some analysts consider it the most
advanced constitution in Honduran history. The preamble expresses faith
in the restoration of the Central American union and emphasizes the rule
of law as a means of achieving a just society.
The 1982 constitution consists of a preamble and 379 articles divided
into eight titles that are further divided into forty-three chapters.
The first seven titles cover substantive provisions delineating the
rights of individuals and the organization and responsibilities of the
Honduran state. The last title provides for the constitution's
implementation and amendment. As of mid-1993, the National Congress had
amended the 1982 constitution on seven occasions and interpreted
specific provisions of the constitution on four occasions.
The organization of the Honduran state, national territory, and
international treaties are covered in Title I of the constitution. As
stated in Article 4, "The government is republican, democratic and
representative" and "composed of three branches: legislative,
executive and judicial, which are complementary, independent, and not
subordinate to each other." In practice, however, the executive
branch has dominated the other two branches of government. Article 2,
which states that sovereignty originates in the people, also includes a
provision new to the 1982 constitution that labels the supplanting of
popular sovereignty and the usurping of power as "crimes of treason
against the fatherland." This provision can be considered an added
constitutional protection of representative democracy in a country in
which the military has a history of usurping power from elected civilian
governments.
Title II addresses nationality and citizenship, suffrage and
political parties, and provides for an independent and autonomous
National Elections Tribunal (Tribunal Nacional de Elecciones--TNE) to
handle all matters relating to electoral acts and procedures. Provisions
regarding nationality and citizenship are essentially the same as in the
1965 constitution, with one significant exception. In the 1965 document,
Central Americans by birth were considered "native-born
Hondurans" after one year of residence in Honduras and after
completing certain legal procedures, but in the 1982 constitution
(Article 24), Central Americans by birth who have resided in the country
for one year are Hondurans by naturalization. With regard to the
electoral system, Article 46 provides for election through proportional
or majority representation.
Individual rights and guarantees for Honduras citizens are addressed
in Title III. This section covers such matters as social, child, and
labor rights; social security; and health, education, culture, and
housing issues. Different from the 1965 constitution is the chapter
devoted entirely to "rights of the child."
The rights of habeas corpus and amparo are provided for in
Title IV, which also addresses the constitutional review of laws by the
Supreme Court of Justice and cases when constitutional guarantees may be
restricted or suspended.
Title V outlines the branches and offices of the government and their
responsibilities, and spells out the procedure for the enactment,
sanction, and promulgation of laws. It covers the legislative,
executive, and judicial branches of government; the Office of the
Comptroller General and the Directorate of Administrative Probity, both
of which are auxiliary but independent agencies of the legislative
branch; the Office of the Attorney General, the legal representative of
the Honduran state; the offices of the ministers of the cabinet, with no
fewer than twelve ministries; the civil service; the departmental and
municipal system of local government; and guidelines for the
establishment of decentralized institutions of the Honduran state.
Different from the 1965 constitution, the terms of legislators and the
president are four years, instead of six years. Another new feature
focuses on the development of local government throughout the country.
Article 299 states that "economic and social development of the
municipalities must form part of the national development program,"
whereas Article 302, in order to ensure the improvement and development
of the municipalities, encourages citizens to form civic associations,
federations, or confederations.
The chapter on the judiciary also contains several changes from the
1965 constitution. The changes, according to one analysis, appear to
bring the administration of justice closer to the people. Article 303
declares that "the power to dispense justice emanates from the
people and is administered free of charge on behalf of the state by
independent justices and judges." The Supreme Court of Justice has
nine principal justices and seven alternates, increased from the seven
principals and five alternates provided in the 1965 document.
Title V also includes a chapter covering the armed forces, which
consists of the "high command, army, air force, navy, public
security force, and the agencies and units determined by the laws
establishing them." Most provisions of this chapter are largely the
same as in the 1965 and 1957 constitutions. As set forth in Article 272,
the armed forces are to be an "essentially professional,
apolitical, obedient, and nondeliberative national institution"; in
practice, however, the Honduran military essentially has enjoyed
autonomy vis-�-vis civilian authority since 1957. The president retains
the title of general commander over the armed forces, as provided in
Article 245 (16). Orders given by the president to the armed forces,
through its commander in chief, must be obeyed and executed, as provided
in Article 278. The armed forces, however, is under the direct command
of the commander in chief of the armed forces (Article 277); and it is
through him that the president performs his constitutional duty relating
to the armed forces. According to Article 285, the Supreme Council of
the Armed Forces (Consejo Superior de las Fuerzas Armadas--Consuffaa) is
the armed forces consultative organ. The Supreme Council is chaired by
the commander in chief of the armed forces, who is elected by the
National Congress for a term of three years. He is chosen from a list of
three officers proposed by Consuffaa. In practice, the National Congress
always approves (some observers would say rubberstamps) Consuffaa's
first choice.
The nation's economic regime, covered in Title VI, "is based on
the principles of efficiency in production and social justice in the
distribution of wealth and national income, as well as on the harmonious
coexistence of the factors of production." As provided in Article
329, the Honduran state is involved in the promotion of economic and
social development, subject to appropriate planning. The title also
includes provisions on currency and banking, agrarian reform (which is
declared to be of public need and interest), the tax system, public
wealth, and the national budget.
Title VII, with two chapters, outlines the process of amending the
constitution and sets forth the principle of constitutional
inviolability. The constitution may be amended by the National Congress
after a two-thirds vote of all its members in two consecutive regular
annual sessions. However, several constitutional provisions may not be
amended. These consist of the amendment process itself, as well as
provisions covering the form of government, national territory, and
several articles covering the presidency, including term of office and
prohibition from reelection.
Honduras - GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESS
Executive
The executive branch in Honduras, headed by a president who is
elected by a simple majority, has traditionally dominated the
legislative and judicial branches of government. According to political scientist Mark B. Rosenberg, the entire
Honduran government apparatus is dependent on the president, who defines
or structures policy (with the exception of security policy, which
remains in the military's realm) through legislation or policy decrees.
However, Rosenberg also notes that in an environment of intense rivalry
and animosity between the two major parties, in which the president is
under pressure to reward his party's supporters, public policy
initiatives often do not fare well, as the executive becomes bogged down
with satisfying more pressing parochial needs. Political scientist James
Morris points out that the executive-centered nature of the Honduran
political system has endured whether the head of state has been an
elected civilian politician or a general, and that the Honduran state's
formal and informal center of authority is the executive.
According to the constitution, the president has responsibility for
drawing up a national development plan, discussing it in the cabinet,
submitting it to the National Congress for approval, directing it, and
executing it. He or she directs the economic and financial policy of the
state, including the supervision and control of banking institutions,
insurance companies, and investment houses through the National Banking
and Insurance Commission. The president has responsibility for
prescribing feasible measures to promote the rapid execution of agrarian
reform and the development of production and productivity in rural
areas. With regard to education policy, the president is responsible for
organizing, directing, and promoting education as well as for
eradicating illiteracy and improving technical education. With regard to
health policy, the president is charged with adopting measures for the
promotion, recovery, and rehabilitation of the population's health, as
well as for disease prevention. The president also has responsibility
for directing and supporting economic and social integration, both
national and international, aimed at improving living conditions for
Hondurans. In addition, the president directs foreign policy and
relations, and may conclude treaties and agreements with foreign
nations. He or she appoints the heads of diplomatic and consular
missions.
With regard to the legislative branch, the president participates in
the enactment of laws by introducing bills in the National Congress
through the cabinet ministers. The president has the power to sanction,
veto, or promulgate and publish any laws approved by the National
Congress. The president may convene the National Congress into special
session, through a Permanent Committee of the National Congress, or may
propose the continuation of the regular annual session. The president
may send messages to the National Congress at any time and must deliver
an annual message to the National Congress in person at the beginning of
each regular legislative session. In addition, although the constitution
gives the National Congress the power to elect numerous government
officials (such as Supreme Court justices, the comptroller general, the
attorney general, and the director of administrative probity), these
selections are essentially made by the president and rubberstamped by
the National Congress.
The constitution sets forth forty-five powers of the National
Congress, the most important being the power to make, enact, interpret,
and repeal laws. Legislative bills may be introduced in the National
Congress by any deputy or the president (through the cabinet ministers).
The Supreme Court of Justice and the TNE may also introduce bills within
their jurisdiction. In practice, most legislation and policy initiatives
are introduced by the executive branch, although there are some
instances where legislation and initiatives emanate from the National
Congress. A bill must be debated on three different days before being
voted upon, with the exception of urgent cases as determined by a simple
majority of the deputies present. If approved, the measure is sent to
the executive branch for sanction and promulgation. In general, a law is
considered compulsory after promulgation and after twenty days from
being published in the official journal, Gaceta Judicial. If
the president does not veto the bill within ten days, it is considered
sanctioned and is to be promulgated by the president.
If the president vetoes a measure, he must return it to the National
Congress within ten days explaining the grounds for disapproval. To
approve the bill again, the National Congress must again debate it and
then ratify it by a two-thirds majority vote, whereupon it is sent to
the executive branch for immediate publication. However, if the
president originally vetoed the bill on the grounds that it was
unconstitutional, the bill cannot be debated in the National Congress
until the Supreme Court renders its opinion on the measure within a
timeframe specified by the National Congress. If an executive veto is
not overridden by the National Congress, the bill may not be debated
again in the same session of the National Congress.
If the National Congress approves a bill at the end of its session,
and the president intends to veto it, the president must immediately
notify the National Congress so that it can extend the session for ten
days beyond when it receives the disapproved bill. If the president does
not comply with this procedure, he must return the bill within the first
eight days of the next session of the National Congress.
Certain acts and resolutions of the National Congress may not be
vetoed by the president. Most significantly these include the budget
law, amendments to the constitution, declarations regarding grounds for
impeachment for high-ranking government officials, and decrees relating
to the conduct of the executive branch.
With regard to security, the president is charged with maintaining
peace and internal security of the nation and with repelling every
attack or external aggressor. During a recess of the National Congress,
the president may declare war and make peace, although the National
Congress must be convened immediately. The president may restrict or
suspend certain individual rights and guarantees with the concurrence of
the cabinet for a period of forty-five days, a period that may be
renewed. (Article 187 of the constitution spells out the procedure to be
followed for the suspension of rights.) The president may deny or
permit, after congressional authorization, the transit of foreign troops
through Honduran territory. The president is also charged with
monitoring the official behavior of public officials for the security
and prestige of the Honduran government and state.
In theory, the president exercises command over the armed forces as
the general commander and adopts necessary measures for the defense of
the nation. The president confers military ranks for second lieutenant
through captain based on the proposal of the commander in chief of the
armed forces. Most importantly, the president is charged with ensuring
that the army is apolitical, essentially professional, and obedient. In
practice, however, the military operates autonomously. According to the
view of Honduran political scientist Ernesto Paz Aguilar, the armed
forces is the country's principal political force, exercising a tutelary
role over the other institutions of government and constituting a de
facto power that is not subordinate to civilian political power. Other
observers, although acknowledging the military is a politically powerful
institution, maintain that the military essentially confines its spheres
of influence to national security and internal stability, although in
recent years, they concede that the military has had an increasing role
in economic activities.
Serving under the president are the ministers of the cabinet, who
cooperate with the president in coordinating, directing, and supervising
the organs and agencies of the executive branch under their
jurisdiction. As required by Article 246 of the constitution, there are
to be at least twelve departments of the cabinet covering the following
portfolios: government and justice; the Office of the President; foreign
affairs; economy and commerce; finance and public credit; national
defense and public security; labor and social welfare; public health and
social aid; public education; communications, public works, and
transport; culture and <>tourism
; and natural resources. In addition to
these ministries, in the early 1990s, there was also another
cabinet-level department, the Ministry of Planning, Coordination, and
Budget. The National Congress may summon the cabinet ministers to answer
questions relating to their portfolios. Within the first days of the
installation of the National Congress, ministers must submit annually a
report on the work done in their respective ministries. The president
convokes and presides over the cabinet ministers in a body known as the
Council of Ministers, which, according to the constitution, meets at the
president's initiative to make decisions on any matters he or she
considers of national importance and to consider such cases specified by
law.
In addition to the various ministries, the president may create
commissions, either permanent or temporary, made up of public officials
or other representatives of Honduran sectors to undertake certain
projects or programs mandated by the executive. The president may also
name commissioners to coordinate the action of public entities and
agencies of the state or to develop programs.
The Callejas (1990- ) government created several presidential
commissions for certain projects or programs. In 1990 Callejas
established and headed the Modernization of the State Commission, which
included thirty representatives of governmental institutions, the four
legally recognized political parties, business, and labor. The objective
of the commission was to study and design national policies for
reforming the functioning of the Honduran state, including reform of the
legislature and judiciary, decentralization of the power of the
executive branch in favor of the municipalities, and modernizing public
administration.
In December 1992, the Callejas government appointed a head to the
National Commission for the Protection of Human Rights (Comisi�n
Nacional para la Protecci�n de Derechos Humanos-- Conaprodeh), a new
position established to protect the rights of persons who consider
themselves victims of abuse or an unjust act by judicial or public
administration.
In 1993 the Callejas government established two additional
commissions, a Fiscal Intervention Commission to investigate
governmental corruption that began with an inquiry into corruption at
the Customs Directorate, and a high-level ad hoc Commission for
Institutional Reform, headed by Roman Catholic Archbishop Oscar Andr�s
Rodr�guez. The ad hoc commission, created in early March 1993, was
established to formulate recommendations within thirty days for specific
measures to improve the security forces, especially the National
Directorate of Investigations (Directorio de Investigaci�n
Nacional--DIN), and to strengthen the judiciary and public prosecutor's
office. The DNI was created because of growing public criticism of the
DNI and military impunity. It had representatives from each branch of
government, from the military, from each of the four 1993 presidential
candidates, and from the mass media.
The Honduran civil service system regulates employment in the public
sector, theoretically based on the principles of competence, efficiency,
and honesty, according to the constitution. In practice, however, the
system has been a source of political patronage, which some observers
claim has led to a bloated bureaucracy. In 1990 there were an estimated
70,000 government employees, including employees of the decentralized
institutions. Economic austerity measures introduced by the Callejas
government reportedly led to the dismissal of thousands of employees,
although some claim that thousands of other employees were hired because
of political patronage. According to some observers, a fundamental
problem of the Honduran civil service is its politicization, whereby
much of the bureaucracy is replaced when the ruling party changes.
Traditionally, in Honduras, political patronage has been a key
characteristic of the two dominant political parties. According to
political scientist Mark B. Rosenberg, a president once in office is
under tremendous pressure to provide jobs, recommendations, and other
rewards to his followers in exchange for their continued loyalty and
support.
In addition to the various ministries, there are also numerous
autonomous and semiautonomous state entities within the executive
branch, which have increased in number over the years as the government
has become more involved in the economic development process and the
provision of basic services. These decentralized institutions vary in
their composition, structure, and function, but include three basic
types: public institutes, which are largely government-funded and
perform social or collective services that are not usually provided by
the private sector; public enterprises, which often have their own
resource bases and are autonomous organs of the state; and mixed
enterprises, which bring together the government and private sector,
with the state retaining at least a 51 percent share of the enterprise.
Among the best known decentralized agencies in Honduras are the National
Autonomous University of Honduras (Universidad Nacional Aut�noma de
Honduras-- UNAH); the Central Bank of Honduras (Banco Central de
Honduras); the National Agrarian Institute (Instituto Nacional
Agrario--INA); the Honduran Banana Corporation (Corporaci�n Hondure�a
de Bananas); the Honduran Forestry Development Corporation (Corporaci�n
Hondure�a de Desarrollo Forestal--Cohdefor); the Honduran Coffee
Institute (Corporaci�n Hondure�a deCafe); the Honduran Social Security
Institute (Instituto Hondure�o de Seguro Social--IHSS); the National
Council of Social Welfare (Consejo Nacional de Bienestar Social); and
the National Electric Energy Enterprise (Empresa Nacional de Energ�a El�ctrica).
In addition to its legislative activities, the National Congress also
has other extensive powers, particularly regarding other branches of the
government and other institutions of the Honduran state. The National
Congress is charged with electing numerous government officials: the
nine principal justices and seven alternates of the Supreme Court of
Justice, including its president; the commander in chief of the armed
forces; the comptroller general; the attorney general; and the director
of administrative probity. In practice, however, the National Congress
generally rubberstamps the choices of the president, or, in the case of
the commander in chief of the armed forces, of the military. The
National Congress may declare that there are grounds for impeachment of
certain high-ranking government officials, including the president and
presidential designates, Supreme Court justices, cabinet ministers and
deputy secretaries, and the commander in chief of the armed forces.
In its oversight role, the National Congress may approve or
disapprove the administrative conduct of the other two branches of
government, the TNE, the comptroller general, the attorney general, and
the decentralized institutions. The National Congress may also question
the cabinet secretaries and other officials of the government,
decentralized institutions, and other entities concerning matters
related to public administration.
With regard to the military and national security, as noted above,
the National Congress elects the commander in chief of the armed forces
from a list of three proposed by the Consuffaa. The National Congress
may fix the permanent number of members of the armed forces and confer
all ranks from major to major general, at the joint proposal of the
commander in chief of the armed forces and the president. It may
authorize or refuse the president's request for the crossing of foreign
troops through national territory. It may also authorize the entrance of
foreign military missions of technical assistance or cooperation in the
country. The National Congress may declare an executive-branch
restriction or suspension of individual rights or guarantees in
accordance with constitutional provisions, or it may modify or
disapprove of the restriction or suspension enacted by the president.
With regard to foreign policy, the National Congress has the power to
declare war or make peace at the request of the president. The National
Congress also may approve or disapprove international treaties signed by
the executive branch.
Regarding government finances, the National Congress is charged with
adopting annually (and modifying if desired) the general budget of
revenue and expenditures based on the executive branch's proposal. The
National Congress has control over public revenues and has power to levy
taxes, assessments, and other public charges. It approves or disapproves
the formal accounts of public expenditures based on reports submitted by
the comptroller general and loans and similar agreements related to
public credit entered into by the executive branch.
The legislative branch has two auxiliary agencies, the Office of the
Comptroller General and the Directorate of Administrative Probity, both
of which are functionally and administratively independent. The Office
of the Comptroller General is exclusively responsible for the
post-auditing of the public treasury. It maintains the administration of
public funds and properties and audits the accounts of officials and
employees who handle these funds and properties. It audits the financial
operations of agencies, entities, and institutions of the government,
including decentralized institutions. It examines the books kept by the
state and accounts rendered by the executive branch to the National
Congress on the operations of the public treasury and reports to the
National Congress on its findings. The Directorate of Administrative
Probity audits the accounts of public officials or employees to prevent
their unlawful enrichment.
Some observers maintain that the National Congress gradually became a
more effective and independent institution in the decade after the
country returned to civilian rule in 1982. According to political
scientist Mark Rosenberg, under the presidency of Suazo C�rdova the
institution appeared only to function as a rubber stamp for the
executive branch, with little interest in promoting or creating policy
initiatives. Under the Azcona government (1986-90), however, the
National Congress became more assertive in its relations with the
executive branch--with a more vigorous use of its oversight powers and
more active interest in developing legislation. This trend continued
under the Callejas presidency. In 1993 a new legislative support body,
the Data Processing and Legislative Studies Center (Centro de Inform�tica
y Estudios Legislativas--CIEL), was created with the assistance of the
United States Agency for International Development (AID) to help provide
computer and analytical support to the committees and deputies of the
National Congress.
Other observers stress the executive dominance over the legislative
branch in almost all areas of public policy. They point out that the
tradition of a strong executive is deeply embedded in the national
psyche, with the National Congress itself not willing or able to take
responsibility for its congressional obligations. The general public
view of the National Congress is that deputies use their offices for
personal and political gain. As a result, most people contact executive
branch officials to promote causes, a practice that reinforces executive
dominance and makes it difficult for the congressional leadership to
transform the National Congress into an equal partner in government.
The nation's electoral law also limits the independence and
ultimately the effectiveness of the National Congress. Elections for the
National Congress are held at the same time as presidential elections,
and voters must use a unitary ballot that contains a party's
presidential candidate, as well as its list of congressional candidates
for each department. Voters are not allowed to split their tickets for
national offices; however, in November 1993, voters for the first time
could spilt their ticket for president and mayor. The percentage of
votes that a presidential candidate receives in each department
determines the number of deputies from each party selected to represent
that department. In effect, voters are not sure whom they are electing
to the National Congress. There is no direct accountability to the
electorate. Instead, deputies respond to party leadership, and party
loyalty and bloc voting are the norm. The two major parties dominate the
National Congress, with smaller parties finding it difficult to gain
representation. In the 1989 national elections, the PNH won seventy-one
seats in the National Congress, and the PLH captured fifty-five seats.
The small Pinu won just two seats, and the Honduran Christian Democratic
Party (Partido Dem�crata Cristiano de Honduras--PDCH) gained no seats.
Efforts to change the unitary ballot for the presidential and
legislative candidates for the November 1993 elections were
unsuccessful, largely because the two dominant parties overcame pressure
by the two smaller parties for separate ballots.
The judicial branch of government consists of a Supreme Court of
Justice, courts of appeal, courts of first instance (Juzgados de
Letras), and justices of the peace. The Supreme Court, which is the
court of last resort, has nine principal justices and seven alternates.
The Supreme Court has fourteen constitutional powers and duties. These
include the appointment of judges and justices of the lower courts and
public prosecutors; the power to declare laws to be unconstitutional;
the power to try high-ranking government officials when the National
Congress has declared that there are grounds for impeachment; and
publication of the court's official record, the Gaceta Judicial.
The court has three chambers-- civil, criminal, and labor--with three
justices assigned to each chamber.
Organizationally below the Supreme Court are the courts of appeal.
These courts are three-judge panels that hear all appeals from the lower
courts, including civil, commercial, criminal and habeas corpus cases.
To be eligible to sit on these courts, the judges must be attorneys and
at least twenty-five years old. In the early 1990s, there were nine
courts of appeal, four in Tegucigalpa, two in San Pedro Sula, and one
each in La Ceiba, Comayagua, and Santa B�rbara. Two of these courts of
appeal, one in the capital and one in San Pedro Sula, specialized in
labor cases. In addition, a contentious-administrative court, which
dealt with public administration, was located in Tegucigalpa, but had
jurisdiction throughout the country.
The next level of courts are first instance courts, which serve as
trial courts in serious civil and criminal cases. In the early 1990s,
there were sixty-four such courts. Although half of the first instance
courts were in Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula, each departmental capital
had at least one. Half of the sixty-four courts covered both civil and
criminal cases, eight just covered criminal cases, and seven covered
civil cases. There were also six labor courts, six family courts, two
juvenile courts, two tenant courts, and one contentious-administrative
court. Most of the judges, who must be at least twenty-one years old,
held degrees in juridical science. Although judges are required to be
licensed attorneys, many in fact are not.
The lowest level of the court system consists of justices of the
peace distributed throughout the country. Each department capital and
municipalities with populations of more than 4,000 are supposed to have
two justices, and municipalities with populations less than 4,000 are
supposed to have one justice of the peace. Justices of the peace
handling criminal cases act as investigating magistrates and are
involved only in minor cases. More serious criminal cases are handled by
the first instance courts. Justices of the peace must be more than
twenty-one years of age, live in the municipality where they have
jurisdiction, and have the ability to read and write. In 1990 there were
an estimated 320 justices of the peace, with thirty responsible for
civil cases, thirty for criminal cases, and the remaining 260 justices
covering both civil and criminal cases. Political patronage has
traditionally been the most important factor in appointing justices of
the peace, and this practice has often led to less than qualified
judicial personnel, some of whom have not completed primary education.
The constitution requires that the judicial branch of government is
to receive not less than 3 percent of the annual national budget, but in
practice this requirement has never been met. For example, in 1989 the
judiciary received 1.63 percent of the national budget, just slightly
more than one-half of the amount constitutionally required.
As in previous years, in the early 1990s the Honduran judicial system
has been the subject of numerous criticisms, including widespread
corruption and continuing ineffectiveness with regard to holding
military members or civilian elites accountable for their crimes.
According to the United States Department of State's human rights report
for 1992, the civilian judiciary in Honduras "is weak, underfunded,
politicized, inefficient, and corrupt." The report further charged
that the judiciary remains vulnerable to outside influence and suffers
from woefully inadequate funding, and that the Callejas government is
unable to ensure that many human rights violations are fully
investigated, or that most of the perpetrators, either military or
civilian, are brought to justice. Justice is reported to be applied
inequitably, with the poor punished according to the law, but the rich
or politically influential almost never brought to trial, much less
convicted or jailed.
One frequent criticism has focused on the executive branch's
dominance over the judiciary. Because a new Supreme Court is appointed
every four years with the change in the presidency and because the
executive essentially controls the selection of the justices, the
judiciary is largely beholden to the president. This loyalty to the
executive permeates the judicial branch because the Supreme Court
appoints all lower court justices. To eliminate this partisanship in the
courts, the Modernization of the State Commission, established by
President Callejas, proposed that the constitution be amended to change
the way Supreme Court justices are appointed. According to the proposal,
justices would hold seven-year appointments and would be selected from a
list of candidates developed by a special committee composed of those
who work in the justice sector.
Another criticism notes that judicial personnel are often unqualified
for their positions. Although a Judicial Career Law (which requires that
all hiring and promotions be based on merit and that all firings based
on cause) was approved in 1980, the government did not begin
implementing the law until 1991 because of the overall lack of political
will. The United States Department of State's human rights report for
1992 maintained that results have been few, but AID states that the law
could be fully implemented by 1995. AID has lent support to the Honduran
court since 1985 and in 1989 began an experimental program designed to
improve the selection process for justices of the peace so that the
appointed justices would hold law degrees. By 1991 the AID program
accounted for the qualifications of eighty-one justices of the peace,
and AID estimated that by 1995 about half of all justices of the peace
would have law degrees.
Closely associated with the judicial system and the administration of
justice in Honduras is the Office of the Attorney General, which, as
provided in the constitution, is the legal representative of the state,
representing the state's interests. Both the attorney general and the
deputy attorney general are elected by the National Congress for a
period of four years, coinciding with the presidential and legislative
terms of office. The attorney general is expected to initiate civil and
criminal actions based on the results of the audits of the Office of the
Comptroller General. The law creating the Office of the Attorney General
was first enacted in 1961.
Although some public prosecutors operate out of the Office of the
Attorney General, most operate out of the Office of the Public
Prosecutor of the Supreme Court. The public prosecutor of the Supreme
Court also serves as chief of the Prosecutor General's Office
(Ministerio P�blico) as provided under the 1906 Law of the Organization
and Attributions of the Courts. In April 1993, the Ad Hoc Commission for
Institutional Reform created by President Callejas recommended the
creation of a Prosecutor General's Office as an independent, autonomous,
and apolitical organization, not under either the Supreme Court or the
Office of the Attorney General. The prosecutor general would be
appointed by the National Congress by a two-thirds vote for a seven-year
appointment. The ad hoc commission also recommended that this new
Prosecutor General's Office have under it a newly created Department of
Criminal Investigation (Departamento de Investigaci�n Criminal--DIC), a
police and investigatory corps that would replace the current DIN, a
department of the Public Security Force (Fuerza de Seguridad P�blica--Fusep)
that has often been associated with human rights abuses.
Honduras - Local Government
Honduras is administratively divided into eighteen departments (Atl�ntida,
Choluteca, Col�n, Comayagua, Cop�n, Cort�s, El Para�so, Francisco
Moraz�n, Gracias a Dios, Intibuc�, Islas de la Bah�a (Bay Islands),
La Paz, Lempira, Ocotepeque, Olancho, Santa B�rbara, Valle, and Yoro),
each with a designated department capital (cabecera). The
president of the republic freely appoints, and may freely remove,
governors for each department. Departmental governors represent the
executive branch in official acts in their department and serve as the
tie between the executive branch and other national agencies and
institutions that might have delegations working in the department. Each
governor may freely appoint and remove a secretary to assist him or her.
If a governor is absent more than five days, the mayor of the
departmental capital substitutes for the governor. The costs of running
the departmental governments fall under the budget of the Ministry of
Government and Justice.
The departments are further divided into 291 municipalities (municipios)
nationwide, including a Central District consisting of the cities of
Tegucigalpa and Comayag�ela. A municipality in Honduras may include
more than one city within its boundaries, and is therefore similar to
the jurisdiction of county in the United States. In addition to cities,
municipalities may also include aldeas (villages) and caser�os
(hamlets), which are scattered concentrations of populations outside
urban areas. The urbanized cities may be divided into smaller divisions
known as colonias (colonies) and barrios (neighborhoods).
The municipalities are administered by elected corporations,
deliberative organs that are accountable to the courts of justice for
abuses, and are supposed to be autonomous or independent of the central
government's powers. The municipal corporations consist of a mayor (alcalde),
who is the paramount executive authority in a municipality, and a
municipal council that varies in size depending on the population of the
municipality. Those municipalities with a population of less than 5,000
have four council members, those with a population of between 5,000 and
10,000 have six, and those with a population between 10,000 and 80,000
have eight. All the department capitals, regardless of their population,
and municipalities with a population of more than 80,000 have ten
council members.
The municipal corporations meet at least two times per month in
ordinary sessions, but special sessions may be called by the mayor or by
at least two council members. Each municipal corporation has a
secretary, freely appointed and removed by a majority of the members of
the corporation, and a treasurer, named by the corporation at the
request of the mayor. Municipalities with annual revenue of more than
one million lempiras are to have an auditor named by the municipal corporation;
however, in the early 1990s, the majority of Honduran municipalities had
an annual revenue of less than one million lempiras.
The constitution sets forth several provisions regarding the
municipalities. According to Article 299, the economic and social
development of the municipalities must form part of the nation's
development plans. Each municipality is also to have sufficient communal
land in order to ensure its existence and development. Citizens of
municipalities are entitled to form civic associations, federations, or
confederations in order to ensure the improvement and development of the
municipalities. In general, income and investment taxes in a
municipality are paid into the municipal treasury.
In 1990 a new Law of Municipalities covering both departmental and
municipal administration superseded the previous municipal law issued in
1927. The new law set forth the numerous rights and responsibilities of
the municipalities and public administration at the municipal level. It
also outlined the concept of municipal autonomy, characterized by free
elections; free public administration and decisions; the collection and
investment of resources with special attention on the preservation of
the environment; the development, approval, and administration of a
municipal budget; the organization and management of public services;
the right of the municipality to create its own administrative
structure; and municipal control over natural resources. The law also
outlines twenty-one functions of the municipal corporations, which
include the following responsibilities: organizing public administration
and services, developing and implementing a municipal budget, appointing
public employees and naming needed public commissions, planning urban
development, and consulting the public through plebiscites on important
municipal issues and through open public meetings with representatives
of the various social sectors of the municipality.
Under the law, each municipality has a Municipal Development Council
named by the corporation and consisting of representatives of the
various economic and social sectors of the municipality. The Municipal
Development Council functions in an advisory capacity by providing the
corporations with information and input for making decisions. The law
also calls for a special law to be enacted to regulate the organization
and functioning of a national Institute of Municipal Development to
promote the integrated development of municipalities in Honduras.
Traditionally, the central government in Honduras, whether civilian
or military, has dominated local government, and some observers maintain
that local mayors and municipal corporations have served largely as
administrative arms of the central government. With the return to
democratic rule in 1982, however, there has been a shift, at least in
theory, to promote the economic development and political independence
of the municipalities. New provisions in the 1982 constitution call for
economic and social development in the municipalities to form parts of
national development programs and outline the right of citizens to form
organizations to ensure the improvement and development of the
municipalities.
The Callejas government emphasized support for political and
administrative decentralization from the executive branch to the
municipalities. In fact, one of the objectives in establishing the
Modernization of the State Commission in 1990 was to reduce the
centralism of the executive branch through the effective and orderly
transfer of functions and resources to the municipalities in order to
fortify their autonomy. The promulgation of the new Law of
Municipalities in 1990 was further evidence of the Callejas government's
emphasis on municipal development. Observers noted, however, that the
executive branch, particularly through the decentralized agencies and
institutions, still wielded significant power at the local level in the
early 1990s.
One significant measure approved in 1992 was reform of the nation's
electoral law for the 1993 national elections. For the first time, the
law would allow voters to cast their ballots separately for mayoral
candidates. In previous elections, the practice of split-party voting
was not allowed, and the mayors were elected based on the percentage of
the vote received by the presidential candidates. The reform of the
electoral law is significant in that it makes elected mayors directly
accountable to the electorate and strengthens the democratic process at
the local level. The reform could also strengthen the chances for the
nation's two smaller parties to gain representation in the
municipalities.
Honduras - The Electoral Process
The president is elected along with three presidential designates
(who essentially function as vice presidents) for fouryear terms of
office beginning on January 27. The president and the presidential
designates must be Honduran by birth, more than thirty years old, and
enjoy the rights of Honduran citizenship. Additional restrictions
prohibit public servants and members of the military from serving as
president. Commanders and general officers of the armed forces and
senior officers of the police or state security forces are ineligible.
Active-duty members of any armed body are not eligible if they have
performed their functions during the previous twelve months before the
election. The relatives (fourth degree by blood and second degree by
marriage) and spouse of each military officer serving on Consuffaa are
also ineligible, as are the relatives of the president and the
presidential delegates. Numerous high-level public servants, including
the presidential designates, cabinet secretaries and deputy secretaries,
members of the TNE, and justices and judges of the judicial branch, are
prohibited from serving as president if they have held their positions
six months prior to the election.
If the president dies or vacates office, the order of succession is
spelled out in Article 242 of the 1982 constitution. The presidential
designates are the first three potential successors; the National
Congress elects one to exercise executive power for the remainder of the
presidential term. The president of the National Congress and the
president of the Supreme Court of Justice are the fourth and fifth
successors, respectively. During a temporary absence, the president may
call upon one of the presidential designates to replace him.
The president, who is the representative of the Honduran state, has a
vast array of powers as head of the executive branch. The constitution
delineates forty-five presidential powers and responsibilities. The
president has the responsibility to comply with and enforce the
constitution, treaties and conventions, laws, and other provisions of
Honduran law. He or she directs the polices of the state and fully
appoints and dismisses secretaries and deputy secretaries of the cabinet
and other high-ranking officials and employees (including governors of
the eighteen departments) whose appointment is not assigned to other
authorities.
To be elected to the National Congress, one must be a Honduran by
birth who enjoys the rights of citizenship and is at least twenty-one
years old. There are a number of restrictions regarding eligibility for
election to the National Congress. Certain government officials and
relatives of officials are not eligible if the position was held six
months prior to the election. All officials or employees of the
executive and judicial branches, except teachers and health-care
workers, are prohibited from being elected, as are active duty members
of any armed force, highranking officials of the decentralized
institutions, members of the TNE, the attorney general and deputy
attorney general, the comptroller general, and the director and deputy
director of administrative probity. Spouses and relatives (fourth degree
by blood and second degree by marriage) of certain high ranking civilian
officials and certain military officials are also prohibited from
serving in the National Congress, as are delinquent debtors of the
National Treasury.
The nine principal justices and seven alternates on the Supreme Court
of Justice are elected by the National Congress for a term of four years
concomitant with the presidential and legislative terms of office. The
National Congress also selects a president for the Supreme Court, and
justices may be reelected. To be eligible, a justice must be Honduran by
birth, a lawyer, a member of the bar association, more than thirty-five
years of age, enjoy the rights of citizenship, and have held the post of
trial judge or a judge on a court of appeals for at least five years.
Since the country returned to civilian democratic rule in 1982,
national elections in Honduras have been held every four years for the
presidency, the National Congress, and municipal officials. As provided
for in the constitution and in the country's Electoral and Political
Organizations Law, the National Elections Tribunal (Tribunal Nacional de
Elecciones--TNE) is an autonomous and independent body, with
jurisdiction throughout the country and with responsibility for the
organization and conduct of elections. The composition of the TNE
consists of one principal member and an alternate proposed by the
Supreme Court, and one principal member and an alternate proposed by
each of the four registered political parties, the PLH, the PNH, the
Pinu, and the PDCH. The presidency of the tribunal rotates among the
members, with a term lasting one year. The TNE also names members of
Departmental Elections Tribunals and Local Elections Tribunals, each
with representatives from the four legally inscribed parties. The TNE
has numerous rights and responsibilities, including inscribing political
parties and candidates, registering voters, resolving electoral
complaints, establishing the time and places for voting, training poll
workers, and counting and reporting votes.
The National Registry of Persons, a dependency of the TNE, is
responsible for issuing to all Hondurans exclusive identity cards, which
also serve as voter registration cards, and for preparing the National
Electoral Census at least five months before an election. All Hondurans
are required by law to register with the National Registry of Persons.
According to some observers, a fundamental problem with the TNE is
its politicization. Observers charge that the staffs of both the TNE and
the National Registry of Persons are predominantly composed of political
appointees with little competence or commitment. Representation is
skewed toward the party in power because of the representative proposed
by the Supreme Court, which essentially is a representative of the
government in power. In 1985 President Suazo C�rdova brazenly used the
TNE to attempt to support unrepresentative factions of the two major
parties. Military leader General Walter L�pez Reyes impeded Suazo C�rdova's
attempt by modifying the electoral system so that party primaries and
the general elections were held at the same time. The winner would be
the leading candidate of the party receiving the most votes. As a
result, PLH candidate Jos� Azcona Hoyo was elected president by
receiving just 25 percent of the vote, compared with the PNH candidate,
Rafael Leonardo Callejas Romero, who received 45 percent. Subsequently,
however, for the 1989 elections, separate party primaries were required
to elect the candidates, resulting in just one candidate from each
party.
As the 1993 electoral campaign got underway, the PLH made numerous
charges that the National Electoral Census did not include the names of
many of its party members. Despite the charges, observers maintained
that the elections would probably be as legitimate as the past four
elections (Constituent Assembly elections in 1980 and national elections
in 1981, 1985, and 1989), which were conducted without serious
irregularities.
Honduras - Political Parties
Two Traditionally Dominant Parties
Honduras essentially has had two dominant political parties, the PNH
and the PLH, for most of this century, with the military allying itself
with the PNH for an extended period beginning in 1963. The PLH was
established in 1891 under the leadership of Policarpo Bonilla V�squez
and had origins in the liberal reform efforts of the late nineteenth
century. The PNH was formed in 1902 by Manuel Bonilla as a splinter
group of the PLH. Between 1902 and 1948, these two parties were the only
officially recognized parties, a factor that laid the foundation for the
currently entrenched PNH (red) and PLH (blue) two-party system. In the
early 1990s, the internal workings of the two traditional political
parties appeared to be largely free of military influence. Since the
country returned to civilian rule in 1982, the military has not
disrupted the constitutional order by usurping power as it did in 1956,
1963, and 1972, and it no longer appears to favor one party over the
other as it did with the PNH for many years.
There appear to be few ideological differences between the two
traditional parties. The PLH, or at least factions of the PLH, formerly
espoused an antimilitarist stance, particularly because of the PNH's
extended alliance with the military. The two PLH presidencies of the
1980s, however, appeared to end the PLH's antipathy toward the military.
According to political scientists Ronald H. McDonald and J. Mark Ruhl,
both parties are patron-client networks more interested in amassing
political patronage than in offering effective programs. As observed by
political scientist Mark Rosenberg, Honduran politicians emphasize
competition and power, not national problem-solving, and governing in
Honduras is determined by personal authority and power instead of
institutions. The objective of political competition between the two
parties has not been a competition for policies or programs, but rather
a competition for personal gain in which the public sector is turned
into private benefit. Nepotism is widespread and is an almost
institutionalized characteristic of the political system, whereby public
jobs are considered rewards for party and personal loyalty rather than
having anything to do with the public trust. The practice of using
political power for personal gain also helps explain how corruption
appears to have become a permanent characteristic not only of the
political system, but also of private enterprise.
Despite these characteristics, the two traditional parties have
retained the support of the majority of the population. Popular support
for the two traditional parties has been largely based on family
identification, with, according to political scientist Donald Schulz,
voting patterns passed on from generation to generation. According to
McDonald and Ruhl, about 60 percent of voters are identified with the
traditional parties, with the PLH having a 5 percent advantage over the
PNH.
Traditionally, the PNH has had a stronger constituency in rural areas
and in the less developed and southern agricultural departments, whereas
the PLH has been traditionally stronger in the urban areas and in the
more developed northern departments, although the party has had some
rural strongholds. In a study of five Honduran elections from 1957 to
1981, James Morris observes that the PLH had a strong base of support in
the five departments that made up the so-called central zone of the
country--Atl�ntida, Cort�s, Francisco Moraz�n, El Para�so, and Yoro.
The PNH had strong support in the more rural and isolated departments of
Cop�n, Lempira, Intibuc�, and Gracias a Dios, and the southern
agricultural departments of Valle and Choluteca.
Looking more closely at the four national elections since 1980, one
notices two facts: the PLH dominated the elections of 1980, 1981 and
1985, at times capturing departments considered PNH bulwarks (Choluteca
and Valle), whereas the PNH crushed the PLH in the 1989 elections,
winning all but two departments, one the traditional PLH stronghold of
El Para�so. Honduran scholar Julio Navarro has examined electoral
results since 1980 and observes that in the 1989 elections the PNH won
significantly not only at the department level but also at the municipal
level. Of the 289 municipalities in 1989, the PNH captured 217, or about
75 percent of the country's municipalities.
According to political analysts, two significant factors helped bring
about the success of the PNH in the 1989 elections: the cohesiveness and
unity of the PNH and the disorder and internal factionalism of the PLH.
The PLH has had a tradition of factionalism and internal party disputes.
In the early 1980s, there were two formal factions: the conservative
Rodista Liberal Movement (Movimiento Liberal Rodista--MLR), named for
deceased party leader Modesto Rodas Alvarado and controlled by Roberto
Suazo C�rdova; and the center-left Popular Liberal Alliance (Alianza
Liberal del Pueblo--Alipo), founded by brothers Carlos Roberto Reina and
Jorge Arturo Reina. By 1985, however, there were five different factions
of the PLH. Alipo had split with the Reina brothers to form the
Revolutionary Liberal Democratic Movement (Movimiento Liberal Democr�tico
Revolucionario--M-Lider), which represented a more strongly antimilitary
platform, and another faction led by newspaper publisher Jaime Rosenthal
retained the Alipo banner. The MLR split into three factions: one led by
President Suazo C�rdova, which supported Oscar Mej�a Arellano as a
1985 presidential candidate; a second faction headed by Efra�n Bu Gir�n,
who also became a presidential candidate; and a third faction led by Jos�
Azcona Hoyo, who ultimately was elected president with the support of
Alipo, which did not run a candidate. Only the complicated electoral
process utilized in the 1985 elections, which combined party primaries
and the general election, allowed the PLH to maintain control of the
government.
Three PNH factions also vied for the presidency in the 1985
elections, but the National Movement of Rafael Callejas (Movimiento
Nacionalista Rafael Callejas--Monarca) easily triumphed over factions
led by Juan Pablo Urrutia and Fernando Lardizabel, with Callejas winning
45 percent of the total national vote and almost 94 percent of the PNH
vote. PNH unity around the leadership of Callejas endured through the
1989 elections. Callejas was responsible for modernizing the
organization of the PNH and incorporating diverse social and economic
sectors into the party. As a result, in the 1989 elections he was able
to break the myth of PLH inviolability that had been established in the
three previous elections of the 1980s. In the 1989 contest, the PNH
broke PLH strongholds throughout the country.
The PLH was not as successful as the PNH in achieving party unity for
the 1989 elections. The PLH candidate, Carlos Flores Facusse, had
survived a bruising four-candidate party primary in December 1988 in
which he received 35.5 percent of the total vote. As noted by Julio
Navarro, Flores was an extremely vulnerable candidate because in the
primary he did not win major urban areas or departments considered PLH
strongholds.
The electoral campaign for the November 1993 national elections was
well underway by mid-1993. The PLH nominated Carlos Roberto Reina Idi�quez,
a founder of M-Lider and former president of the Inter-American Court of
Human Rights (IACHR), the leftist PLH faction. The PNH nominated
conservative and controversial Osvaldo Ramos Soto, former Supreme Court
president and former rector of the UNAH in the 1980s. As of mid-1993,
public opinion polls showed the two candidates about even.
Reina won his party's nomination in elections on December 6, 1992, by
capturing 47.5 percent of the vote in a six-candidate primary; second
place was taken by newspaper publisher Rosenthal, who received 26.1
percent of the vote. Unlike the PLH primary of December 1988, the 1992
PLH nomination process demonstrated the party's strong support for
Reina, who won in fourteen out of eighteen departments. Reina, who
represented Honduras before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in
the border conflict with El Salvador, advocated a "moral
revolution" in the country and vowed to punish those who enriched
themselves through corruption.
The nomination process for the PNH was not an open process like that
of the PLH, and a vote scheduled for November 29, 1993, served only to
legalize the candidacy of Ramos Soto. The actual process of choosing the
PNH candidate had occurred several months earlier, in July 1992, when
the Monarca faction and the Ramos Soto faction struck a deal in which
Ramos Soto was to be the candidate. The Monarca's presidential
precandidate, Nora Gunera de Melgar (the widow of General Juan Alberto
Melgar Castro, former head of state), was eliminated from consideration
despite her objections. Other minor factions were not allowed to present
their candidates.
In his campaign, Ramos Soto described himself as a "successful
peasant" ("campesino superado"), alluding to his
humble origins in order to gain popular support. Despite capturing the
nomination, Ramos Soto encountered some resistance to his PNH candidacy,
with some party members believing that his election would be a setback
for the modernization program begun by President Callejas. Other
Honduran sectors remembered Ramos Soto's reign as UNAH rector when he
led a campaign to oust leftist student groups. Some human rights
activists even claimed that Ramos Soto had collaborated with the
military to assassinate leftists at the university.
Honduras - Smaller Political Parties and Movements
Since Honduras's return to civilian democratic rule in the 1980s, two
small centrist political parties, the Pinu and the PDCH, have
participated in regular national presidential and legislative elections.
Neither party, however, has challenged the political domination of the
two traditional parties. Both parties have received most of their
support from urban centers of Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula, Choluteca,
and La Ceiba. In the presidential elections of 1981, 1985, and 1989,
Pinu received 2.5 percent, 1.4 percent, and 1.8 percent, respectively,
and the PDCH received 1.6 percent, 1.9 percent, and 1.4 percent. Both
parties have presented presidential candidates for the 1993 national
elections.
Pinu was first organized in 1970 by businessman Miguel Andonie Fern�ndez
as an effort to reform and reinvigorate the nation's political life.
This urban-based group, which draws support from middle-class
professionals, first attempted to gain legal recognition (personer�a
jur�dica) in 1970, but the PNH blocked Pinu's attempts until the
1980 Constituent Assembly elections. Pinu won three seats in those
elections, important because only two votes separated the two
traditional parties in the National Congress. Pinu also held a cabinet
position in the provisional government headed by General Policarpo Paz
Garc�a (1980-82) in 1980. In the 1981 elections, Pinu acquired three
legislative seats, whereas in the 1985 and 1989 elections it won only
two seats. Pinu became affiliated with the Social Democratic
International in 1988. In 1985 and 1989, Enrique Aguilar Cerrato was the
Pinu presidential candidate, and in 1993 businessperson Olban Valladares
was the party's candidate.
The origins of the Honduras Christian Democratic Party (Partido Dem�crata
de Honduras--PDCH) date back to the 1960s, when, in the wake of Vatican
Council II, the Roman Catholic Church became involved in the development
of community organizations, including unions, and student and peasant
groups. In 1968 lay persons associated with the Roman Catholic Church
founded the Christian Democratic Movement of Honduras (Movimiento Dem�crata
Cristiano de Honduras--MDCH), which in 1975 became the PDCH. According
to Mark Rosenberg, the party became more progressive than the Roman
Catholic Church and maintained solid ties with peasant organizations.
Although the party applied for legal recognition, the PNH blocked the
process, and the party did not receive recognition until late 1980, too
late to be part of the Constituent Assembly drafting a new constitution,
but just in time to compete in the 1981 national elections. In those
elections, the PDCH earned just one seat in the National Congress. In
the 1985 elections, the party won two seats in the National Congress,
but in 1989 it did not win any representation. Efra�n D�az
Arrivillaga, who reportedly gave the party the reputation for being the
"conscience" of the Honduran National Congress in the 1980s,
was the PDCH's 1989 presidential candidate; the 1993 candidate was
businessperson Marcos Orlando Iriarte Arita.
In the early 1980s, amidst the Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua and the civil conflict in El
Salvador, several radical leftist guerrilla groups that advocated some
type of armed action against the Honduran government were formed in
Honduras. The Honduran Revolutionary Party of Central American Workers
(Partido Revolucionario de los Trabajadores Centroam�ricanos de
Honduras--PRTCH) was formed in 1976 as part of a regional party. The
Morazanist Front for the Liberation of Honduras (Frente Morazanista para
la Liberaci�n de Honduras--FMLH), first active in 1980, was named for
Honduran national hero Francisco Moraz�n, who had tried to keep the
Central American states unified in the early nineteenth century. The
Lorenzo Zelaya Popular Revolutionary Forces (Fuerzas Populares
Revolucionarias Lorenzo Zelaya--FPR-LZ), founded in 1980 and named for a
communist peasant leader who was murdered in 1965, traced its roots to a
pro- Chinese faction of the PCH. The Cinchoneros Popular Liberation
Movement (Movimiento Popular de Liberaci�n Cinchoneros--MPLC), founded
in 1981, was named for a nineteenth century peasant leader. With the
exception of the MPLC which had about 300 members, the groups had
memberships of fewer than 100 participants each.
In 1982 these new radical groups joined the Communist Party of
Honduras (Partido Comunista de Honduras--PCH), under the loose umbrella
of the National Unified Directorate-Movement of Revolutionary Unity
(Directorio Nacional Unificado-Movimiento de Unidad
Revolucionario--DNU-MUR). The PCH, which was formed in 1927, had been
the country's major leftist opposition group through the 1970s, but had
rarely resorted to violence before its affiliation with the DNU-MUR. An
offshoot of the PCH that was not part of the DNU-MUR was the
Marxist-Leninist Communist Party of Honduras (Partido Comunista
Marxista-Leninista de Honduras--PCMLH), formed in 1967 by PCH
dissidents.
Guerrilla groups in Honduras were responsible for numerous terrorist
incidents throughout the 1980s. These included a successful plane
hijacking in exchange for the freeing of political prisoners, the
holding of hostages, bombings, and attacks against United States
military personnel and advisers. Political assassinations included the
January 1989 murder of General Gustavo lvarez Martinez by the members of
the MPLC. Nevertheless, compared with neighboring El Salvador and
Nicaragua, these groups were small and did not attract much popular
support. According to analysts, one fundamental reason is the
conservative nature of Honduran society, which is not conducive to a
revolutionary uprising. Moreover, according to political scientist
Donald Schulz, Honduran society is characterized by a network of
interlocking interest groups and political organizations that have
reconciled conflicts that could have turned violent. Schulz also
observes that important escape valves like agrarian reform, a strong
union movement, an entrenched two-party system, and the restoration of
elected democracy in the 1980s also enabled Honduras to escape the
revolution of its neighbors.
Some analysts maintain that another important factor explaining why
revolutionary groups did not gain much ground in Honduras was the
government's swift use of repression. In the early 1980s, when General
was military chief, the military waged a campaign against leftist groups
that included political assassinations, disappearances, and illegal
detentions. Those leftist political leaders who escaped the military's
campaign did so by going into exile. In the summer of 1983, the military
struck against the PRTCH, which reportedly was moving a contingent of
almost 100 guerrillas into the Honduran province of Olancho from
Nicaragua. The Honduran military claimed that most of the rebels were
killed in combat or died from exhaustion while hiding out from the
military, but human rights organizations maintain that most of the
rebels, including a United States-born Jesuit priest, James Carney, were
detained and executed.
With the end of the Contra war in Nicaragua in 1990 and a peace
accord in El Salvador in 1991, Honduran guerrilla groups lost important
sources of support. By 1992 most guerrilla groups, including the six
groups of the DNU-MUR, had largely ceased operating, and many political
exiles had returned to the country in order to take advantage of an
amnesty offered by the Callejas government. Some former exiles worked to
establish new political parties. For example, the PCMLH formed the Party
for the Transformation of Honduras (Partido para la Transformaci�n de
Honduras--PTH), and the FMLH established the Morazanist Liberation Party
(Partido Morazanista de Liberaci�n--PML). Other leftist groups
operating openly in the early 1990s included the Honduran Revolutionary
Party (Partido Revolucionario Hondure�o--PRH), the Workers' Party
(Partido de los Trabajadores--PT), the Patriotic Renovation Party
(Partido de Renovaci�n Patri�tica--PRP), and the People's Democratic
Movement (Movimiento Democr�tico del Pueblo-- MDP).
These six parties, which reportedly planned to run under a united
front in 1998 elections, presented a plan to President Callejas in 1992
to reform the country's electoral law in order to facilitate the
participation of smaller parties in national elections; the plan
included a reduction of signatures required for a party to be legally
registered. In order to be legally registered, a political party must
complete a complex process that can be made even more complex by the
politicization of the electoral tribunal. A party seeking legal
recognition, according to the nation's Electoral and Political
Organizations Law, must have local organizations in at least half of the
nation's departments and municipalities, and must present valid
nominations of at least 20,000 registered voters affiliated with the
party asking to be registered.
Despite the incorporation of most leftist leaders and groups into the
political system, there were still sporadic terrorist actions in
Honduras in the early 1990s instigated by remnants or factions of the
armed guerrilla groups of the 1980s. For example, although four top
leaders of the Cinchoneros renounced armed struggle in May 1991, a
faction of the group still wanted to fight and was responsible for the
burning of an electric company building in 1992. Moreover, a small
fringe group known as the Morazanist Patriotic Front, which appeared to
be unrelated to the FMLH, vowed to continue armed struggle and claimed
responsibility for terrorist attacks and several political killings in
the early 1990s.
At various times during the 1980s, there were also reports of the
presence of right-wing extremist groups, which were associated with the
Honduran military. Most observers judged that the military and police
were largely responsible for right-wing extremism throughout the 1980s.
In the early 1980s, when the military was under the command of General
�lvarez, reportedly more than 140 disappearances of government
opponents were carried out, largely by a secret army unit, or death
squad apparatus, known as Battalion 3- 16. For the balance of the 1980s,
the military and police were reportedly involved in extrajudicial
killings of opponents and torture, but not at the high level of the
first part of the decade. In 1988 and 1989, a paramilitary group known
as the Alliance for Anticommunist Action (Alianza de Acci�n
Anticomunista--AAA), which human rights organizations contend was tied
to the military, was involved in a campaign to intimidate leftist
leaders and human rights activists. The AAA took credit for several
activities aimed at intimidating the left and human rights groups,
including making death threats, circulating threatening posters with the
AAA logo, and defacing property.
Honduras - Interest Groups
The organized labor movement of Honduras, traditionally the strongest
in Central America, first began organizing in the early years of the
twentieth century. The movement, however, gained momentum only with the
great banana strike of 1954, at which point organized labor unions
became a political force in the country, at times having an important
impact on government policy. In that year, labor won the right to form
unions legally and to engage in collective bargaining. In addition, the
country's first national peasant organizations were formed in the
mid-1950s, and later picked up momentum when an Agrarian Reform Law was
enacted in 1962.
In the early 1990s, trade unions represented about 20 percent of the
Honduran labor force and exerted considerable economic and political
influence. According to the United States Department of State's 1992
human rights report, unions frequently participated in public rallies
against government policies and made use of the media. Unions also
gained wage and other concessions from employers through collective
bargaining and the use of the right to strike. For example, in May 1992,
direct negotiations between organized labor and the private sector led
to a 13.7 percent increase in the minimum wage, the third consecutive
annual increase.
Nevertheless, organized unions and peasant organizations still
experienced significant difficulties in the early 1990s. Retribution
against workers for trade union activity was not uncommon and the right
to bargain collectively was not always guaranteed. Union activists at
times were the target of political violence, including assassination,
and workers were at times harassed or fired for their trade union
activities. Several peasant leaders were killed for political reasons;
and in a highly publicized May 1991 massacre, five members of a peasant
organization were killed, reportedly by military members, because of a
land dispute. The government also at times supported pro- government
parallel unions over elected unions in an attempt to quiet labor unrest.
In 1993 Honduras had three major labor confederations: the
Confederation of Honduran Workers (Confederaci�n de Trabajadores de
Honduras--CTH), claiming a membership of about 160,000 workers; the
General Workers' Central (Central General de Trabajadores--CGT),
claiming to represent 120,000 members; and the Unitary Confederation of
Honduran Workers (Confederaci�n Unitaria de Trabajadores de
Honduras--CUTH), a new confederation formed in May 1992, with an
estimated membership of about 30,000. The three confederations included
numerous trade union federations, individual unions, and peasant
organizations.
The CTH, the nation's largest trade confederation, was formed in 1964
by the nation's largest peasant organization, the National Association
of Honduran Peasants (Asociaci�n Nacional de Campesinos de
Honduras--Anach), and by Honduran unions affiliated with the
Inter-American Regional Organization of Workers (Organizaci�n Regional
Interamericana de Trabajadores--ORIT), a hemispheric labor organization
with close ties to the American Federation of Labor and Congress of
Industrial Organization (AFL-CIO). In the early 1990s, the confederation
had three major components, the 45,000- member Federation of Unions of
National Workers of Honduras (Federaci�n Sindical de Trabajadores
Nacionales de Honduras-- Fesitranh), the 22,000-member Central
Federation of Honduran Free Trade Unions (Federaci�n Central de
Sindicatos Libres de Honduras), and the 2,200-member Federation of
National Maritime Unions of Honduras (Federaci�n de Sindicales Mar�timas
Nacionales de Honduras). In addition, Anach, claiming to represent
between 60,000-80,000 members, was affiliated with Fesitranh. Fesitranh
was by far the country's most powerful labor federation, with most of
its unions located in San Pedro Sula and the Puerto Cort�s Free Zone.
The unions of the United States-owned banana companies and the United
States-owned petroleum refinery also were affiliated with Fesitranh. The
CTH received support from foreign labor organizations, including ORIT;
the American Institute for Free Labor Development (AIFLD); and Germany's
Friedreich Ebert Foundation. The CTH was an affiliate of the
International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU).
The CGT, first formed in 1970, but not legally recognized until 1982,
was originally formed by the Christian Democrats and received external
support from the World Confederation of Labor (WCL) and the Latin
American Workers Central (Central Latinoamericana de
Trabajadores--CLAT), a regional organization supported by Christian
Democratic parties. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, however, the CGT
leadership developed close ties to the PNH, and several leaders served
in the Callejas government. Another national peasant organization, the
National Union of Peasants (Uni�n Nacional de Campesinos--UNC),
claiming a membership of 40,000, has been affiliated with the CGT for
many years and is a principal force within the confederation.
The CUTH was formed in May 1992 by two principal labor federations,
the Unitary Federation of Honduran Workers (Federaci�n Unitaria de
Trabajadores de Honduras--FUTH) and the Independent Federation of
Honduran Workers (Federaci�n Independiente de Trabajadores de
Honduras--FITH), as well as several smaller labor groups, all critical
of the Callejas government's strong neoliberal economic reform program.
The Marxist FUTH, with an estimated 16,000 members in the early 1990s,
was first organized in 1980 by three communist-influenced unions, but
did not receive legal status until 1988. The federation had external
ties with the World Federation of Trade Unions (WFTU), the Permanent
Congress for Latin American Workers Trade Union Unity (Congreso
Permanente de Unidad Sindical de Trabajadores de Am�rica
Latina--CPUSTAL), and the Central American Committee of Trade Union
Unity (Comit� de Unidad Sindical de Centroam�rica--CUSCA). Its
affiliations included water utility, university, electricity company,
brewery, and teacher unions, as well as several peasant organizations,
including the National Central of Farm Workers (Central Nacional de
Trabajadores del Campo--CNTC), formed in 1985 and active in land
occupations in the early 1980s.
FUTH also became affiliated with a number of leftist popular
organizations in a group known as the Coordinating Committee of Popular
Organizations (Comit� Coordinadora de las Organizaciones
Populares--CCOP) that was formed in 1984. The FITH, claiming about
13,000 members in the early 1990s, was granted legal status in 1988.
Originally formed by dissident FUTH members, the federation consisted of
fourteen unions.
Many Honduran peasant organizations were affiliated with the three
labor confederations in the early 1990s. Anach was created and received
legal recognition in 1962 in order to counter the communist-influenced
peasant movement of the National Federation of Honduran Peasants
(Federaci�n Nacional de Campesinos de Honduras-- Fenach). In contrast,
Fenach never received legal recognition. Its offices were destroyed
following the 1963 military coup by Colonel Oswaldo L�pez Arellano,
and, in 1965, seven of Fenach's leaders who had taken up armed struggle
against the government, including founder Lorenzo Zelaya, were killed by
the military. Anach became the primary peasant organization and in 1967
became affiliated with the CTH.
The UNC, traditionally a principal rival of Anach and traditionally
more radical than Anach, was established in 1970 but did not receive
legal recognition until 1984. The UNC traces its roots to the community
development organizations and peasant leagues established by the Roman
Catholic Church in the 1960s. The UNC was a founding member of the CGT
and had ideological ties to the MDCH.
In addition to Anach and the UNC, another large peasant organization
in the 1990s was the Honduran Federation of Agrarian Reform Cooperatives
(Federaci�n de Cooperativas de la Reforma Agraria de
Honduras--Fecorah). The federation was formed in 1970 and received legal
recognition in 1974. In the early 1990s, Fecorah had about 22,000
members.
There were numerous attempts to unify the nation's peasant
organizations in the 1970s and 1980s, but the sector was characterized
by numerous divisions, including ideological divisions. For some peasant
organizations, political affiliation changed with changes in the
government. Disillusionment with the neglect of unions and peasant
organizations under the PLH administrations of the 1980s caused some
groups to move toward the PNH. In 1988 the three major peasant
organizations, Anach, the UNC, and Fecorah, along with smaller leftist
peasant groupings, united under the banner of the Coordinating Council
of Honduran Peasant Organizations (Consejo Coordinador de Organizaciones
Campesinas de Honduras--Cocoh) to lobby for agrarian reform. Just four
years later, however, in May 1992, the peasant movement was split by
disagreement over the Callejas government's proposed agricultural
modernization law. The three major peasant organizations all left Cocoh
to form the National Peasants Council (Consejo Nacional de
Campesinos--CNC), while leftist peasant organizations remained in Cocoh
and actively demonstrated against the proposed agricultural
modernization law.
From 1989 until 1992, the nation's major peasant organizations and
labor federations, a confederation of cooperatives, and several
professional organizations supported the "Platform of Struggle for
the Democratization of Honduras." The objective of the campaign was
to present far-reaching economic, social, and political reform proposals
to the national government, which included issuing several documents and
a manifesto. By 1993 however, this initiative had disappeared because of
divisions among the disparate groups and, according to some observers,
because of the Callejas government's success in coopting several
organizations.
The organized peasant movement in Honduras was an important, if not
determinant, factor in implementing an agrarian reform program. In the
early 1960s, because of increasing pressure on the government from
landless peasants and external pressure from the United States through
the Alliance for Progress, the PLH government of Ram�n Villeda Morales
took significant steps toward implementing a land reform program. He
established the National Agrarian Institute (Instituto Nacional
Agrario--INA) in 1961 and the following year approved an agrarian reform
law that especially was aimed at the uncultivated lands of the United
States-owned fruit companies. The 1963 military coup and subsequent
repressive rule of General L�pez Arellano brought an abrupt halt to
land redistribution. By the late 1960s, however, peasant organizations
were again increasing pressure on the government, and under a director
who was sympathetic to the peasant movement, the INA began to adjudicate
land claims in favor of peasants.
The election of conservative Ram�n Ernesto Cruz as president in 1971
once again shifted the government's agrarian policy to one favoring the
large landholders, but with the 1972 coup, again led by General L�pez
Arellano, the government instituted a far-reaching agrarian reform
program. The program was all the more significant because it was driven
by L�pez Arellano, who had crushed land reform efforts in the 1960s.
This time around, however, the general allied himself with peasant
organizations. He issued an emergency land reform decree in 1972 and in
1975 issued another agrarian reform measure that promised to distribute
600,000 hectares to 120,000 families over a period of approximately five
years.
In 1975, however, a conservative countercoup by General Juan Melgar
Castro ended these high expectations for land redistribution. After 1977
land redistribution continued, but at lower levels. According to a study
by Charles Brockett, from 1962 through 1984, a little more than 293,000
hectares were distributed, benefiting about 52,000 families countrywide.
Brockett observed, however, that most of the land distributed was public
land rather than idle or underutilized private land. In the 1980s, land
redistribution slowed while peasant land takeovers of underused land
continued unabated. The government's reaction to the takeovers was
mixed. At times, the military reversed them by force, and, on other
occasions, the government did nothing to stop the occupations.
In 1992 the Callejas government enacted a new agricultural
modernization law that some observers claim essentially ended prospects
for additional land distribution. The law, approved by the National
Congress in March 1992, limited expropriations and augmented guarantees
for private ownership of land. The United States Department of State
observed that the law improved the environment for increases in
investment, production, and agricultural exports. The law was actively
opposed by some peasant organizations, who waged a campaign of land
occupations and claimed that those peasant organizations that supported
the law were linked to PNH or were bought by the government.
In the early 1990s, the government increasingly intervened in the
affairs of labor unions and peasant organizations through parallel
unions. For example, in July 1992, the Callejas government gave legal
recognition to two parallel unions in the telecommunications workers
union and to a second union representing road, airport, and terminal
maintenance employees. In October 1992, the government recognized a
faction of Anach that favored the Callejas government's proposed
agricultural modernization law even though another faction had won a
union election.
Unions in Honduras have strongly opposed the growth of solidarity (solidarismo)
associations, which emphasize labor-management harmony. These
associations, which consist of representatives of both labor and
management, provide a variety of services by utilizing a joint
worker/employer capital fund. Solidarity associations began in the late
1940s in Costa Rica and have thrived there, accounting for almost 16
percent of the work force. In Honduras solidarity associations first
appeared in 1985 and, although the government had not granted the
associations legal status, by the early 1990s they accounted for about
10,000 workers in a variety of companies. Organized labor, including
Honduran unions and international labor affiliations, strongly opposes
solidarity associations on the grounds that they do not permit the right
to strike and that they do not include appropriate grievance procedures.
Unions contend that the associations are management- controlled
mechanisms that undermine unionism. In 1991 a bitter strike at El
Mochito mine was reportedly begun by unions who opposed management's
attempt to impose a solidarity association there.
Honduras - Popular Organizations
A plethora of special interest organizations and associations were
active during the 1980s and early 1990s. Some of these organizations,
like student groups and women's groups, had been active long before the
1980s, but others, such as human rights organization and environmental
groups, only formed in the 1980s. Still other groups were just beginning
to organize. In 1993, for example, a newly formed homosexual rights
association petitioned the government for legal recognition. Beginning
in 1984, a number of leftist popular organizations were linked with the
FUTH in the CCOP. Some observers maintain that the number and power of
popular organizations grew in the 1980s because of the inertia and
manipulation associated with the traditional political process. Others
contend that the proliferation of popular organizations demonstrates the
free and open nature of Honduran society and the belief of the citizens
that they can influence the political process by organizing.
The student movement in Honduras, which dates back to 1910, is
concentrated at the country's largest institution of higherlearning ,
UNAH, which had an enrollment of around 30,000 students in the early
1990s. Ideological divisions among the student population and student
organizations have often led to violence, including the assassination of
student leaders. Leftist students, organized into the Reformist
University Front (Frente de Reforma Universitaria--FRU), largely
dominated student organizations until the early 1980s, but ideological
schisms within the group and an anti-leftist campaign orchestrated by
General Gustavo �lvarez broke leftist control of official university
student bodies. Since the early 1980s, the rightwing Democratic
University United Front (Frente Unido Universitario Democr�tico--FUUD),
which reportedly has ties to the PNH and to the military, has become the
more powerful student organization, with close ties to the conservative
university administration. Osvaldo Ramos Soto, the PNH 1993 presidential
candidate, served as FUUD coordinator while he was UNAH's rector in the
mid-1980s. In the early 1990s, political violence in the student sector
escalated. FRU leader Ram�n Antonio Bricero was brutally tortured and
murdered in 1990, and four FUUD activists were assassinated in the
1990-92 period.
Organized women's groups in Honduras date back to the 1920s with the
formation of the Women's Cultural Society that struggled for women's
economic and political rights. Visitaci�n Padilla, who also actively
opposed the intervention of the United States Marines in Honduras in
1924, and Graciela Garc�a were major figures in the women's movement.
Women were also active in the formation of the Honduran labor movement
and took part in the great banana strike of 1954. In the early 1950s,
women's associations fought for women's suffrage, which finally was
achieved in 1954, making Honduras the last Latin American country to
extend voting rights to women. In the late 1970s, a national peasant
organization, the Honduras Federation of Peasant Women (Federaci�n
Hondure�a de Mujeres Campesinas--Fehmuca), was formed; by the 1980s, it
represented almost 300 organizations nationwide. As a more
leftist-oriented women's peasant organization, the Council for
Integrated Development of Peasant Women (Consejo de Desarrollo Integrado
de Mujeres Campesinos--Codeimuca) was established in the late 1980s and
represented more than 100 women's groups. Another leftist women's
organization, the Visitaci�n Padilla Committee, was active in the
1980s, opposing the presence of the United States military and the
Contras in Honduras.
Numerous other women's groups were active in the late 1980s and early
1990s, including a research organization known as the Honduran Center
for Women's Studies (Centro de Estudios de la Mujer-Honduras--CEM-H).
Another organization, the Honduran Federation of Women's Associations
(Federaci�n Hondure�a de Asociaciones Femininas--Fehaf), represented
about twenty-five women's groups and was involved in such activities as
providing legal assistance to women and lobbying the government on
women's issues.
Although women were represented at all levels of government in the
late 1980s and early 1990s, their numbers were few. According to CEM-H,
following the 1989 national elections, women held 9.4 percent of
congressional seats and 6.2 percent of mayorships nationwide, including
the mayorship of Tegucigalpa. In the Callejas government, women held
several positions, including one seat on the Supreme Court, three out of
thirty-two ambassadorships, and two out of fifty-four high-level
executive branch positions. For the 1993 presidential elections, the
Monarca faction of the PNH originally supported the nomination of a
woman as the PNH candidate, and the PLH nominated a woman as one of its
three presidential designate candidates.
Honduras - Domestic Human Rights Organizations
Human rights groups in Honduras first became active in the early
1980s when revolution and counterrevolution brought violence and
instability to Central America. In Honduras, these groups organized in
response to the mounting level of violence targeted at leftist
organizations, particularly from 1982-84, when General Gustavo lvarez
commanded the military. Human rights organizations were at times
targeted by the Honduran military with harassment and political
violence. According to some observers, the United States embassy in
Honduras also got involved in a campaign to discredit Honduran human
rights organizations at a time when Honduras was serving as a key
component of United States policy toward Central America by hosting the
Contras and a United States military presence.
In the early 1990s, there were three major nongovernmental human
rights organizations in Honduras: the Committee for the Defense of Human
Rights in Honduras (Comit� para la Defensa de Derechos Humanos de
Honduras--Codeh); the Committee of the Families of the Detained and
Disappeared in Honduras (Comit� de las Familias de los Detenidos y
Desaparecidos Hondure�os--Cofadeh); and the Center of the Investigation
and Promotion of Human Rights (Centro de Investigaci�n y Promoci�n de
los Derechos Humanos--Ciprodeh).
Established in 1981 by Ram�n Custodio, Codeh became the country's
foremost human rights organization in the 1980s, with a network
throughout the country. The organization withstood harassment and
intimidation by Honduran security forces. In January 1988, Codeh's
regional director in northern Honduras, Miguel �ngel Pav�n, was
assassinated before he was about to testify in a case brought before the
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR). In 1981 and 1982, Codeh
and Cofadeh had brought three cases before the IACHR involving the
disappearances of two Hondurans, �ngel Manfredo Vel�squez and Sa�l
God�nez, and two Costa Ricans traveling in Honduras, Fairen Garbi and
Yolanda Sol�s Corrales. The court ultimately found Honduras responsible
for the disappearances of the two Hondurans, but not for the two Costa
Ricans.
In the 1990s, Codeh remained the country's most important and most
internationally known human rights organization. Codeh continued to
issue annual reports and to speak out frequently, not only on human
rights violations, but also on economic, social, and political issues.
Some observers, however, have criticized Codeh for going beyond a human
rights focus, as well as for exaggerating charges against the government
and military. In the 1980s and as late as 1990, the United States
Department of State in its annual human rights reports on Honduras
charged that Codeh's charges were ill-documented, exaggerated, and in
some cases false.
Cofadeh was founded in 1982 by Zenaida Vel�squez, sister of �ngel
Manfredo Vel�squez, the missing student and labor activist whose case
Codeh and Cofadeh brought before the IACHR. As its name suggests,
Cofadeh's membership consisted of relatives of the disappeared and
detained, and in the 1980s its members often demonstrated near the
Presidential Palace in the center of Tegucigalpa.
Ciprodeh, founded in 1991 by Leo Valladares, provides human rights
educational and legal services. The group offers human rights courses
and monthly seminars and has a special program for the protection of the
rights of children and women.
The Honduran government did not established an effective human rights
monitor until late 1992, and Codeh and Cofadeh often served this
purpose. In 1987 the Azcona government established the
InterInstitutional Commission on Human Rights (Comisi�n
InterInstitucional de Derechos Humanos--CIDH), made up of
representatives from the three branches of government and the military,
to investigate human rights violations. The CIDH proved ineffective and
did not receive cooperation from either civilian judicial or military
authorities.
In December 1992, the Callejas government inaugurated a new
governmental human rights body headed by Valladares. In 1993 this new
office of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Rights
(Comisi�n Nacional para la Protecci�n de Derechos Humanos--
Conaprodeh) received complaints of human rights violations and, in some
instances, provided "protection" to those citizens issuing
complaints.
In the early 1990s, Honduras also had a number of ethnic-based
organizations representing Hondurans of African origin and the nation's
indigenous population. Six ethnic-based organizations were loosely
grouped together under the Honduras Advisory Council for Autonomous
Ethnic Development (Consejo Asesor Hondure�o para el Desarrollo de las
�tnicas Aut�ctonas--CAHDEA). Representing the nation's black
population, including the Garifuna, and English-speaking Creoles was the
Honduras Black Fraternal Organization (Organizaci�n Fraternal Negra
Hondure�a--Ofraneh), a group established in 1977 for the betterment of
social, political, economic, and cultural conditions of black Hondurans.
The indigenous peoples of Honduras first began forming national
organizations in the 1950s, and in the 1990s, five indigenous
organizations were represented in CAHDEA. These consisted of
organizations representing the Miskito, Pech, Lenca, Towaka, and Jicaque
peoples. According to the United States Department of State in its human
rights report for 1992, Honduran indigenous peoples had "little or
no participation in decisions affecting their lands, cultures,
traditions, or the allocation of natural resources." The report
further asserted that legal recourse is commonly denied to indigenous
groups and that the seizing of indigenous lands by nonindigenous farmers
and cattle growers is common.
Honduras - The Press
Freedom of speech and the press are guaranteed by the Honduran
constitution, and in practice these rights are generally respected.
Nevertheless, as noted in the United States Department of State's 1992
human rights report, the media are subject to both corruption and
politicization, and there have been instances of selfcensorship ,
allegations of intimidation by military authorities, and payoffs to
journalists. In a scandal that came to light in January 1993, a Honduran
newspaper published an internal document from the National Elections
Tribunal (Tribunal Nacional de Elecciones--TNE) that listed authorized
payments to thirteen journalists. Observers maintain that numerous
governmental institutions, including municipalities, the National
Congress, the various ministries, and the military, have been involved
in paying journalists for stories; some estimate that more than 50
percent of journalists receive payoffs. Another significant problem in
the media has been self-censorship in reporting on sensitive issues,
especially the military. Intimidation in the form of threats,
blacklisting, and violence also occurred at various times in the 1980s
and early 1990s.
According to some analysts, however, despite instances of military
intimidation of the press in early 1993, the media, including the press,
radio, and television, has played an important role in creating an
environment conducive to the public's open questioning and criticism of
authorities. Honduran sociologist Leticia Salom�n has observed that in
early 1993 the media, including newspaper caricatures, played an
instrumental role in mitigating the fear of criticizing the military,
and he asserts that this diminishment of fear was an important step in
the building of a democratic culture in Honduras.
Honduras has five daily national newspapers, three based in
Tegucigalpa--El Peri�dico, La Tribuna and El
Heraldo--and two based in San Pedro Sula--El Tiempo and La
Prensa. Quite conservative in its outlook, El Peri�dico
has former president Callejas as its principal stockholder. Owned by PLH
leader and businessperson Jaime Rosenthal (who placed second in the PLH
presidential primary for the 1993 national election), the left-of-center
El Tiempo has been the newspaper most prone to criticize the
police and military, for which its editor, Manuel Gamero, has at times
been jailed. In February 1993, a bomb exploded at the home of the
newspaper's business manager after the paper gave refuge to a reporter,
Eduardo Coto, who had witnessed the assassination of a San Pedro Sula
businessperson, Eduardo Pina, in late January 1993. Coto alleged that
Pina had been killed by two former members of the notorious Battalion
3-16, a military unit reportedly responsible for numerous disappearances
in the early 1980s. After alleged death threats from military members,
Coto fled to Spain, where he received asylum.
La Tribuna and La Prensa are considered centrist
papers by some observers, although some might put La Prensa
into the more conservative center-right category. La Tribuna,
which is owned by Carlos Flores Facusse (the unsuccessful 1989
presidential candidate), has close ties to the PLH and to the new
industrial sector of Tegucigalpa. La Prensa has close ties with
the business section of San Pedro Sula. Its president and editor is
Jorge Canahuati Larach, whose family also publishes El Heraldo,
a conservative paper that has been more favorable to the military in its
reporting than other dailies and often reflects the positions of the
PNH.
In addition to the five dailies, Honduras also has numerous smaller
publications. Most significantly, the Honduran Documentation Center
(Centro de Documentaci�n de Honduras--Cedoh), run by the widely
respected political analyst Victor Meza, publishes a monthly Bolet�n
Informativo; and Cedoh and the sociology department of UNAH publish
Puntos de Vista, a magazine dedicated to social and political
analysis. In addition, an English-language weekly paper, Honduras
This Week, covers events in Honduras and in Central America.
Honduras - Civilian Democratic Rule
In the decade since Honduras returned to civilian democratic rule in
1982, the political system has undergone notable changes. Hondurans
successfully elected three civilian presidents in the 1980s, and
elections came to be celebrated in an almost holidaylike atmosphere,
similar to the electoral process in Costa Rica. In 1993 the nation was
again gearing up for national elections in November, with conservative
Osvaldo Ramos Soto of the PNH squaring off against Carlos Roberto Reina,
leader of a leftist faction of the PLH. Although remaining a powerful
factor in the political system, the military is increasingly facing
challenges from civilians who are beginning to hold it responsible for
involvement in human rights violations.
Nevertheless, many observers have noted that although Honduras has
held regular elections and has begun to hold the military accountable,
the nation still faces numerous political challenges, most notably
reforming the administration of justice so that both military and
civilian elites can be held accountable for their actions, realizing
civilian control over the military, and rooting out corruption from
government.
The human rights situation deteriorated significantly in the first
few years of civilian rule, when the military, under the command of
General Gustavo �lvarez Mart�nez, initiated a campaign against
leftists that led to the disappearance of more than 100 people. Small
insurgent groups also began operating during this period, but the
overwhelming majority of political killings were carried out by the
military. Although this violence paled in comparison to the violence in
neighboring El Salvador and Guatemala, it marked a departure from the
relatively tranquil Honduran political environment. Beginning in 1985,
political violence declined significantly but did not completely
disappear; a small number of extrajudicial killings continued to be
reported annually for the balance of the 1980s and early 1990s. In July
1988 and January 1989, when the Honduran government was held responsible
by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) for the 1982
disappearances of �ngel Manfredo Vel�squez and Sa�l God�nez,
Honduran authorities were also held responsible by the court for a
deliberate kidnapping campaign of between 100 and 150 individuals
believed to be tied to subversive activities between 1981 and 1984.
In the early 1990s, as the political conflicts in El Salvador and
Nicaragua were abating, the Honduran public increasingly began to
criticize the military for human rights violations, including a number
of political and other types of extrajudicial killings. One case that
ignited a public outcry against the military was the July 1991 rape,
torture, and murder of an eighteen-year old student, Riccy Mabel Mart�nez,
by military members. Initially, the military would not allow the
civilian courts to try the three suspects, but ultimately the military
discharged the suspects from the military so as not to set the precedent
of military members being tried in civilian courts. After a long drawn
out process, two of the suspects, including a former colonel, were
convicted of the crime in July 1993, marking the first time that a
high-ranking officer, even though no longer in the military, was
prosecuted in the civilian courts.
Observers credit former United States Ambassador Cresencio Arcos with
speaking out promptly on the case and urging the Honduran government to
prosecute it through an open judicial process. In fact, the United
States embassy increasingly has been viewed as a champion for human
rights in Honduras, and its human rights reports in the early 1990s were
considerably more critical than those prepared in the 1980s.
Although Honduras has experienced more than a decade of civilian
democratic rule, some observers maintain that the military is still the
most powerful political player in the country. Its disregard for
civilian authority is demonstrated by the military's immunity from
prosecution for human rights violations. In early 1993, after the
military received considerable public criticism for alleged involvement
in the killing of a businessperson in San Pedro Sula in January 1993,
military forces were deployed in both San Pedro Sula and in the capital.
Rumors abounded about the true intention of the deployment, reportedly
made without the knowledge of President Callejas. Some observers
speculated that armed forces chief, General Luis Alonso Discua Elvir,
took the action to intimidate his opponents and stem a barrage of recent
criticism against the military. President Callejas later announced that
he had ordered the deployment as one of a series of actions to deter
criminal violence.
Some critics maintain that President Callejas should have been more
forceful with the military and attempted to assert more civilian control
during his presidency, particularly when the military tried to impede
the prosecution of the Riccy Mart�nez case. Some maintain that Callejas
himself had close ties with General Disc�a, thus explaining why no
strong civilian action was taken against the military. Others, however,
maintain that Callejas substantially improved civilian control over the
military with the establishment of such commissions as the Ad Hoc
Commission for Institutional Reform, which recommended the breakup of
the National Investigations Department, and the creation of a new
Department of Criminal Investigation (Departamento de Investigaci�n
Criminal-- DIC) within the civilian government.
A growing concern of the business sector in the early 1990s was the
military's increasing involvement in private enterprise. Through its
Military Pension Institute (Instituto de Pensi�n Militar--IPM), the
military acquired numerous enterprises, including the nation's largest
cement factory, a bank, a real estate agency, cattle ranches, a radio
station, and a funeral home. Critics maintain that the military has a
competitive advantage in a number of areas because of certain benefits
derived from its status, such as the ability to import items duty free.
According to some observers, a fundamental problem associated with
the Honduran political system is the almost institutionalized corruption
found within its ranks. Analysts maintain that the primary motivation of
politicians in Honduras is personal interest; bribery (la mordida)
is a common or institutionalized practice. Publicized instances of
corruption are found throughout the political system, in all branches of
government, and some observers maintain that Hondurans have come to
expect this of their politicians. As noted by Mark B. Rosenberg,
political power in Honduras is defined by one's ability to convert
public authority into private advantage. Some analysts contend that
corruption is literally a necessity to govern effectively in Honduras.
Former United States ambassador Cresencio Arcos notes that "there
is more than a kernel of truth in the Latin American clich�, a deal for
my friend, the law for my enemies."
Some observers maintain that the Callejas government moderated
corrupt practices, as demonstrated by the creation of the Fiscal
Intervention Commission that turned its attention to investigating
extensive corruption in the Customs Directorate. Others maintain that
the commission was a smokescreen to give the appearance that the
government was doing something to root out corruption, when in fact the
Callejas government was saturated with corruption, and personal
enrichment was the norm. The issue of corruption is a theme in the 1993
presidential campaign of PLH candidate Carlos Roberto Reina, who has
pledged a moral revolution to punish those public officials enriching
themselves through corruption.
Honduras - FOREIGN RELATIONS
In the twentieth century, the United States has had more influence on
Honduras than any other nation, leading some analysts to assert that the
United States has been a major source of political power in Honduras.
United States involvement in Honduras dates back to the turn of the
century, when United States-owned banana companies began expanding their
presence on the north coast. The United States government periodically
dispatched warships to quell revolutionary activity and to protect
United States business interests. Not long after the United States
entered World War II, the United States signed a lend lease agreement
with Honduras. Also, the United States operated a small naval base at
Trujillo on the Caribbean Sea. In 1954 the two countries signed a
bilateral military assistance agreement whereby the United States helped
support the development and training of the Honduran military. In the
1950s, the United States provided about US$27 million, largely in
development assistance, to Honduras for projects in the agriculture,
education, and health sectors. In the 1960s, under the Alliance for
Progress program, the United States provided larger amounts of
assistance to Honduras--almost US$94 million for the decade, the
majority again in development assistance, with funds increasingly
focused on rural development. In the 1970s, United States assistance
expanded significantly, amounting to almost US$193 million, largely in
development and food assistance, but also including about US$19 million
in military assistance. Aid during the 1970s again emphasized rural
development, particularly in support of the Honduran government's
agrarian reform efforts in the first part of the decade.
It was in the 1980s, however, that United States attention became
fixated on Honduras as a linchpin for United States policy toward
Central America. In the early 1980s, southern Honduras became a staging
area for Contra excursions into Nicaragua. The conservative Honduran
government and military shared United States concerns over the
Sandinistas' military buildup, and both the United States and Honduran
governments viewed United States assistance as important in deterring
Nicaragua, in both the buildup of the Honduran armed forces and the
introduction of a United States military presence in Honduras.
In 1982 Honduras signed an annex to its 1954 bilateral military
assistance agreement with the United States that provided for the
stationing of a temporary United States military presence in the
country. Beginning in 1983, the Pamerola Air Base (renamed the Enrique
Soto Cano Air Base in 1988) housed a United States military force of
about 1,100 troops known as Joint Task Force Bravo (JTFB) about 80
kilometers from Tegucigalpa near the city of Comayagua. The primary
mission of the task force was to support United States military
exercises and other military activities and to demonstrate the resolve
of the United States to support Honduras against the threat from
Nicaragua. In its military exercises, which involved thousands of United
States troops and United States National Guardsmen, the United States
spent millions of dollars in building or upgrading several air
facilities--some of which were used to help support the Contras-- and
undertaking roadbuilding projects around the country. The United States
military in Honduras also provided medical teams to visit remote rural
areas. In addition, a military intelligence battalion performed
reconnaissance missions in support of the Salvadoran military in its war
against leftist guerrillas of the Farabundo Mart� National Liberation
Front (Frente Farabundo Mart� de Liberaci�n Nacional--FMLN). In 1987
the United States approved a sale of twelve advanced F-5 fighter
aircraft to Honduras, a measure that reinforced Honduran air superiority
in Central America.
During the early 1980s, the United States also established an
economic strategy designed to boost economic development in the
Caribbean Basin region. Dubbed the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI), the
centerpiece of the program was a one-way preferential trade program
providing duty-free access to the United States market for a large
number of products from Caribbean and Central American nations. Honduras
became a beneficiary of the program when it first went into effect in
1984. Although the value of Honduran exports had increased by 16 percent
by 1989, this growth paled in comparison to the growth of United
States-destined exports from other CBI countries such as Costa Rica and
the Dominican Republic.
During the 1980s, the United States provided Honduras with a
substantial amount of foreign assistance. Total United States assistance
to Honduras in the 1980s amounted to almost US$1.6 billion, making the
country the largest United States aid recipient in Latin America after
El Salvador; about 37 percent of the aid was in Economic Support Funds
(ESF), 25 percent in military assistance, 24 percent in development
assistance, and 10 percent in food aid. The remaining 4 percent
supported one of the largest Peace Corps programs worldwide, disaster
assistance, and small development projects sponsored by the
Inter-American Foundation.
By the end of the decade, however, critics were questioning how so
much money could have produced so little. The country was still one of
the poorest in the hemisphere, with an estimated per capita income of
US$590 in 1991, according to the World
Bank, and the government had not implemented any
significant economic reform program to put its house in order. Many
high-level Hondurans acknowledged that the money was ill-spent on a
military build-up and on easy money for the government. According to
former United States ambassador to Honduras Cresencio Arcos, "If
there was a significant flaw in our assistance, it was that we did not
sufficiently condition aid to macroeconomic reforms and the
strengthening of democratic institutions such as the administration of
justice." Moreover, as noted by the United States General
Accounting Office in a 1989 report, the Honduran government in the 1980s
became dependent upon external assistance and tended to view United
States assistance as a substitute for undertaking economic reform. The
report further asserted that the Honduran government was able to resist
implementing economic reforms because it supported United States
regional security programs.
Many observers maintain that United States support was instrumental
in the early 1980s in bringing about a transition to elected civilian
democracy and in holding free and fair elections during the rest of the
decade. Nevertheless, critics charge that United States support for the
Honduran military, including direct negotiations over support for the
Contras, actually worked to undermine the authority of the elected
civilian government. They also blame the United States for tolerating
the Honduran military's human rights violations, particularly in the
early 1980s. They claim that the United States obsession with defeating
the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and the FMLN in El Salvador resulted in
Honduras's becoming the regional intermediary for United States
policy--without regard for the consequences for Honduras. Indeed, some
maintain that the United States embassy in Tegucigalpa often appeared to
be more involved with the Contra war effort against Nicaragua than with
the political and economic situation in Honduras. United States-based
human rights organizations assert that the United States became involved
in a campaign to defame human rights activists in Honduras who called
attention to the abuses of the Honduran military. United States embassy
publications during the 1980s regularly attempted to discredit the two
major human rights groups in Honduras, Codeh and Cofadeh, because of
their "leftist bias," while also calling into question the
large number of disappearances that occurred in the early 1980s.
Hondurans' frustration over the overwhelming United States presence
and power in their country appeared to grow in the late 1980s. For
example, in April 1988 a mob of anti-United States rioters attacked and
burned the United States embassy annex in Tegucigalpa because of United
States involvement in the abduction and arrest of alleged drug
trafficker Juan Ram�n Mata Ballesteros, a prime suspect in the 1985
torture and murder of United States Drug Enforcement Administration
agent Enrique Camarena in Mexico. Nationalist sentiments escalated as
some Hondurans viewed the action as a violation of a constitutional
prohibition on the extradition of Honduran citizens. The mob of students
was reportedly fueled by then UNAH rector Osvaldo Ramos Soto, who later
became Supreme Court president and the PNH candidate for president in
1993.
By the early 1990s, with the end to the Contra war and a peace accord
in El Salvador, United States policy toward Honduras had changed in
numerous respects. Annual foreign aid levels had begun to fall
considerably. Although the United States provided about US$213 million
in fiscal year (FY) 1990 and US$150 million in FY 1991, the amount declined to
about US$98 million for FY 1992 and an estimated US$60 million for FY
1993. Most significant in these declines is that military assistance
slowed to a trickle, with only an estimated US$2.6 million to be
provided in FY 1993.
Although aid levels were falling, considerable United States support
was provided through debt forgiveness. In September 1991, the United
States forgave US$434 million in official bilateral debt that Honduras
owed the United States government for food assistance and United States
AID loans. This forgiveness accounted for about 96 percent of Honduras's
total bilateral debt to the United States and about 12 percent of
Honduras's total external debt of about US$3.5 billion. Observers viewed
the debt forgiveness as partially a reward for Honduras's reliability as
a United States ally, particularly through the turbulent 1980s, as well
as a sign of support for the bold economic reforms undertaken by the
Callejas government in one of the hemisphere's poorest nations.
In the 1990s, the United States remained Honduras's most important
trading partner and the most important source of foreign investment.
According to the United States Department of State, in the early 1990s
Honduras was a relatively open market for United States exports and
investments. In 1992 the Callejas government took important steps toward
improving the trade and investment climate in the nation with the
approval of a new investment law.
Under the rubric of the Enterprise for the Americas Initiative (EAI), a United States foreign policy initiative was introduced by
the George H.W. Bush administration (1989-93) in June 1990, with the
long-term goal of free trade throughout the Americas. The United States
and Honduras signed a trade and investment framework agreement in 1991,
which theoretically was a first step on the road to eventual free trade
with the United States. Some Hondurans in the early 1990s expressed
concern about the potential North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, which could possibly
undermine Honduran's benefits under the CBI and also divert portions of
United States trade and investment to Mexico.
A point of controversy between Honduras and the United States in the
early 1990s was the issue of intellectual property rights. In 1992,
because of a complaint by the Motion Picture Exporters Association of
America, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR)
initiated an investigation into the protection of private satellite
television signals. Local cable companies in Honduras routinely pirated
United States satellite signals, but as a result of the investigation,
the Honduran government pledged to submit comprehensive intellectual
property rights legislation to the National Congress in 1993. If the
USTR investigation rules against Honduras, the country's participation
in the CBI and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) would be
jeopardized.
A significant change in United States-Honduran relations during the
early 1990s was reflected in United States criticism over the human
rights situation and over the impunity of the Honduran military, as well
as recommendations to the Honduran government to cut back military
spending. In one public statement in 1992 that was severely criticized
by the Honduran military, Cresencio Arcos, who was then United States
ambassador, stated that "society should not allow justice to be
turned into a viper that only bites the barefoot and leaves immune those
who wear boots."
Despite the winding down of regional conflicts in the early 1990s,
the United States military maintains a 1,100-member force presence at
the Enrique Soto Cano Air Base. Joint Task Force Bravo is still involved
in conducting training exercises for thousands of United States troops
annually, including road-building exercises, and in providing medical
assistance to remote rural areas. A new mission for the United States
military in Honduras, and perhaps its number-one priority, is the use of
surveillance planes to track drug flights from South America headed for
the United States. Although Honduras is not a major drug producer, it is
a transit route for cocaine destined for both the United States and
Europe. A radar station in Trujillo on the north Honduran coast forms
part of a Caribbean-wide radar network designed for the interdiction of
drug traffickers. The United States military in Honduras maintains a
relatively low profile, with soldiers confined to the base, and the
sporadic anti-Americanism targeted at the United States military in the
past appears largely to have dissipated, most probably because of the
end to regional hostilities and the new supportive role of the United
States as an advocate for the protection of human rights.
Honduras - Central America
Honduran national hero Francisco Moraz�n was a prominent leader of
the United Provinces Central America in the 1820s and 1830s, but his
vision of a united Central America was never fully realized because of
divisiveness among the five original member nations-- Costa Rica, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua--each of which went its
separate way in 1838 with the official breakup of the federation.
Subsequent hopes of restoring some type of political union were
unsuccessful until the 1960s, when economic integration efforts led to
the formation of the Central American Common Market (CACM). In December
1960, the General Treaty of Central American Integration was signed by
El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua, and the CACM became
effective in June 1961. One year later, Costa Rica acceded to the
treaty.
The objectives of the CACM are to eliminate trade barriers among the
five countries and institute a common external tariff (CET). Two
important institutions were established as a result of CACM economic
integration efforts in the 1960s. One was the Secretariat of the General
Treaty on Central American Economic Integration (Secretar�a Permanente
del Tratado General de Integraci�n Econ�mica Centroamericana--SIECA),
based in Guatemala City, which serves as the CACM's executive organ. The
other was the Central American Bank for Economic Integration (Banco
Centroamericano de Integraci�n Econ�mica--BCIE) headquartered in
Tegucigalpa, which is the CACM's financial institution that lends funds
to its member nations, particularly for infrastructure projects. The
CACM integration process was somewhat successful in the 1960s, but by
the end of the decade essentially fell into disarray because of the 1969
border war between Honduras and El Salvador, the so-called "Soccer
War". Honduras officially suspended its
participation in the CACM in December 1970, and relations with El
Salvador remained tense in the 1970s, with border hostilities flaring up
in 1976.
A peace treaty between Honduras and El Salvador was finally signed in
1980, reportedly under significant pressure from the United States.
According to political scientist Ernesto Paz Aguilar, the treaty allied
the Honduran and Salvadoran government in a campaign against the leftist
Salvadoran insurgents, as evidenced by the Honduran military's
participation in the R�o Sumpul massacre of Salvadoran peasants in
April 1980, when hundreds of Salvadoran peasants were reportedly killed
as they attempted to cross the river into Honduras.
Given the historical animosity between the two nations, this military
alliance was indeed surprising. As noted by Victor Meza, United States
policy demanded "ideological and operational solidarity with a
country [El Salvador]" with which there existed "a territorial
dispute and an historic antagonism." For Honduras, United States
military assistance would benefit Honduras not only in case of conflict
with Nicaragua, but also, perhaps most importantly, in case of conflict
with El Salvador. One example of United States disregard for Honduran
sensitivities was the establishment of a Regional Center for Military
Training at Puerto Castilla in 1983, primarily to train Salvadoran
soldiers. The center was eventually closed in 1985 after General �lvarez
Mart�nez, who had agreed to the establishment of the center, was ousted
by General L�pez Reyes. The official Salvadoran-Honduran bilateral
relationship gradually improved in the 1980s.
In the early 1990s, there was considerable movement toward
integration in Central America, in part because of the good personal
relations among the Central American presidents. The semiannual Central
American presidential summits became institutionalized and were
complemented by numerous other meetings among two or more of the
region's nations. The so-called northern triangle of Central America,
consisting of Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras, made consistently
stronger efforts toward integration than did Costa Rica or Nicaragua. At
the tenth Central American summit held in San Salvador in July 1991, the
presidents decided to incorporate Panama into the integration process,
although the method by which this would occur had not been spelled out
as of mid-1993. Belize has also attended the semiannual summits as an
observer. Although Honduras actively participated in Central American
summits since 1986, it officially rejoined the integration process in
February 1992, when the Transitional Multilateral Free Trade Agreement
between Honduras and the other Central American states came into force.
The rejuvenation of economic integration began in June 1990 at the
eighth presidential summit held in Antigua, Guatemala, when the
presidents pledged to restructure, strengthen, and reactivate the
integration process. The presidents signed a Central American Economic
Action Plan (Plan de Acci�n Econ�mica de Centroam�rica-- Paeca) that
included a number of commitments and guidelines for integration. These
included such varied measures as elimination of intraregional tariff
barriers; support for commercial integration; tightening of regional
coordination for external trade, foreign investment, and <>tourism
;
promotion of industrial restructuring; formulation and application of
coordinated agricultural and science and technology policies; and
promotion of coordinated macroeconomic adjustment processes.
At the eleventh presidential summit held in December 1991 in
Tegucigalpa, the presidents signed a protocol for the establishment of
the Central American Integration System (Sistema de Integraci�n
Centroamericana--Sica) to serve as a governing body for the integration
process. The protocol was ratified by the Central American states, and
Sica began operating in February 1993. The main objective of Sica is to
coordinate the region's integration institutions, including SIECA and
the BCIE, which were established in the 1960s.
Further progress toward economic integration was achieved in January
1993, when the five Central American states agreed to reduce the maximum
external tariff for third countries from 40 to 20 percent. In April
1993, a new Central American Free Trade Zone went into effect among the
three northern triangle states and Nicaragua. The new grouping reduced
tariffs for intraregional trade to the 5-20 percent range for some 5,000
products, with the intention of lowering the tariff levels and expanding
the scope of product coverage. The northern triangle states agreed to
create a free trade area and customs union by April 1994.
As regards political integration, the Central American presidents in
1987 signed a Constituent Treaty to set up a Central American Parliament
(Parlamento Centroamericano--Parlacen) to serve as a deliberative body
that would support integration and democracy through consultations and
recommendations. With the exception of Costa Rica, the other four
Central American countries approved the treaty, and Parlacen was
approved in September 1988. Each country was to have twenty elected
deputies in the parliament, but by the date of its inauguration in
October 1991, only three nations-- Honduras, El Salvador, and
Guatemala--had elected representatives. Nicaragua planned to elect
deputies by early 1994. Costa Rica's participation in Parlacen was
impeded by domestic opposition. Since February 1993, Parlacen has formed
part of Sica. Other political organizations under Sica are the Central
American Court of Justice and the Consultative Committee, consisting of
representatives from different social sectors.
As illustrated by the integration process, Honduras's relations with
El Salvador and Nicaragua were close in the early 1990s. In September
1992, after six years of consideration, the ICJ ruled on the border
dispute with El Salvador and awarded Honduras approximately two-thirds
of the disputed area. Both countries agreed to abide by the decision.
The ruling was viewed as a victory for Honduras, but also one that
provided Honduras with significant challenges in dealing with the nearly
15,000 residents of the disputed bolsones who identified
themselves as Salvadorans. Residents of the bolsones petitioned
both governments in 1992 for land rights, freedom of movement between
both nations, and the preservation of community organizations. A
Honduran-Salvadoran Binational Commission was set up to work out any
disputes. The ICJ also determined that El Salvador, Honduras, and
Nicaragua were to share control of the Golfo de Fonseca on the Pacific
coast. El Salvador was awarded the islands of Meanguera and Meanguerita,
and Honduras was awarded the island of El Tigre.
In 1993 political conflict in Nicaragua was again on the rise, with
the government of President Chamorro struggling to achieve national
reconciliation between conservatives of her former ruling coalition and
the leftist Sandinistas. Conservative critics of Chamorro charged her
with caving in to Sandinista demands and complained that the Sandinistas
still controlled the military and policy. Rearmed former Contras were
forming in northern Nicaragua, with reported support from Nicaraguan and
Cuban communities in the United States. Memories of the early 1980s led
some observers to fear a flare-up of hostilities in the
Honduran-Nicaraguan border area, as well as the prospect of another
flood of Nicaraguan refugees into Honduras. Political observers and most
Hondurans were hopeful, however, that even should turmoil break out in
neighboring countries, Honduras would be able to follow the course laid
out in the 1980s and continue to strengthen its democratic traditions.
Acker, Alison. Honduras: The Making of a Banana Republic.
Boston: South End Press, 1988.
An�lisis comparativo de las constituciones pol�ticas de
Honduras. (2d ed.) (Ed., Ramiro Colindres Ortega.)
Tegucigalpa: Corporaci�n Editores Nacional, 1983.
Anderson, Thomas P. Politics in Central America: Guatemala, El
Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua. (2d ed.) New York:
Praeger, 1988.
------. The War of the Dispossessed: Honduras and El Salvador,
1969. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1981.
Bagley, Bruce M. (ed.). Contadora and the Diplomacy of Peace in
Central America. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1987.
Baker, George W. "Ideals and Realities in the Wilson
Administration's Relations with Honduras," The
Americas, 21, No. 3, July 1964, 3-19.
Banco Central de Honduras. Historia financiera de
Honduras. Tegucigalpa: 1957.
Barry, Tom, and Deb Preusch. Central America Fact Book.
New York: Grove Press, 1986.
Booth, John A., and Thomas W. Walker. Understanding Central
America. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1989.
Bowdler, George A. Voter Participation in Central America,
1954-1981: An Exploration. Washington: University Press
of America, 1982.
Bumgartner, Louis E. Jos� Cecilo del Valle of Central
America. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press,
1963.
Car�as, Marco Virgilio, and Daniel Slutzky. La guerra in�til:
An�lisis socioecon�mico del conflicto entre Honduras y El
Salvador. San Jos�, Costa Rica: Editorial Universitaria
Centroamericana, 1971.
Car�as Andino, Tiburcio. Mensajes presidenciales del Doctor y
General Tiburcio Car�as Andino, 1933-1945. Tegucigalpa:
Talleres Tipo-Litogr�ficos Ariston, 1946.
Carr, Albert Z. The World and William Walker. New York:
Harper and Row, 1963.
Chamberlin, Robert S. The Conquest and Colonization of
Honduras, 1502-1550. (2d ed.) Washington: Carnegie
Institution, 1966.
Checchi, Vincent. Honduras: A Problem in Economic
Development. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1959.
Cline, William R., and Enrique Delgado (eds.). Economic
Integration in Central America: A Study. Washington:
Brookings Institution, 1978.
"Contadora Dossier: The General Situation in Central America,"
Review of International Affairs, 38, No. 885,
February 20, 1987, 11-21.
Durham, William H. Scarcity and Survival in Central America:
Ecological Origins of the Soccer War. Stanford: Stanford
University Press, 1979.
Ekholm, Gordon F., and Gordon R. Willey (eds.). Handbook of
Middle American Indians, 4: Archaeological Frontiers and
External Connections. Austin: University of Texas Press,
1966.
Ellsworth, Harry A. One Hundred Eighty Landings of United
States Marines, 1800-1934. Washington: History and
Museums Division, Headquarters, United States Marine Corps,
1974.
Etchison, Don L. The United States and Militarism in Central
America. New York: Praeger, 1975.
Fern�ndez, Arturo. Partidos pol�tico y elecciones en Honduras,
1980. Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras, 1981.
Floyd, Troy S. The Anglo-Spanish Struggle for Mosquitia.
Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1967.
Furlong, William L. The Promise of Democracy in Central
America. (Universities Field Staff International, UFSI
Reports, No. 6.) Indianapolis: 1991.
Glass, John B. "Archaeological Survey of Western Honduras." Pages
157-79 in Gordon F. Ekholm and Gordon R. Willey (eds.),
Handbook of Middle American Indians, 4: Archaeological
Frontiers and External Connections. Austin: University of
Texas Press, 1966.
Glover, David J. "Agrarian Reform and Agro-Industry in Honduras."
Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 7, No. 1,
1986, 21-35.
Grieb, Kenneth J. Guatemalan Caudillo: The Regime of Jorge
Ubico, Guatemala, 1931-1944. Athens: Ohio University
Press, 1979.
Hopkins, Jack W. (ed.). Latin American and Caribbean Record,
1981-82, 1. New York: Holmes and Meier, 1983.
Humphreys, R.A. Latin America and the Second World War: 1939-
1942, 1. London: Athlone for the Institute of Latin
American Studies, University of London, 1981.
Immerman, R.A. The CIA in Guatemala: The Foreign Policy of
Intervention. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982.
Inter-American Committee for Agricultural Development.
Inventory of Information Basic to the Planning of
Agricultural Development in Latin American: Central
America. Washington: Pan American Union, 1965.
Inter-American Development Bank. Economic and Social Progress
in Latin America: Annual Report. Washington: 1968.
------. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: Annual
Report. Washington: 1981.
Johnson, Wayne Earl. "The Honduran-Nicaraguan Boundary Dispute,
1957-1963." (Ph.D. dissertation.) Denver: University of
Denver, 1964.
Karnes, Thomas L. The Failure of Union: Central America, 1824-
1960. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,
1961.
------. Tropical Enterprise: Standard Fruit and Steamship
Company in Latin America. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State
University Press, 1978.
Kepner, Charles David. Social Aspects of the Banana
Industry. New York: AMS Press, 1967.
Kinzer, Stephen, and Stephen Schlesinger. Bitter Fruit: The
Untold Story of the American Coup in Guatemala. Garden
City, New York: Doubleday, 1982.
Latin America and Contemporary Record: 1981-82, 1. (Ed.,
Jack W. Hopkins.) New York: Holmes and Meier, 1983.
Lieuwen, Edwin. Arms and Politics in Latin America. New
York: Praeger, 1960.
------. Generals Versus Presidents: Neomilitarism in Latin
America. New York: Praeger, 1964.
MacCameron, Robert. Bananas, Labor, and Politics in Honduras,
1954-1963. (Foreign and Comparative Studies, Latin
American Series, No. 5.) Syracuse: Syracuse University Press,
1983.
McCann Thomas P. An American Company: The Tragedy of United
Fruit. New York: Crown, 1976.
------. On the Inside: A Story of Intrigue and Adventure on
Wall Street, in Washington, and in the Jungles of Central
America. Boston: Quinlan, 1987.
MacLeod, J. Murdo. Spanish Central America: A Socioeconomic
History, 1520-1720. Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1973.
M�rquez, Javier, et al. "Estudio sobre la econom�a de Honduras."
Pages 1-91 in Banco Central de Honduras, Historia
financiera de Honduras. Tegucigalpa: 1957.
Martz, John. Central America: The Crisis and the
Challenge. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina
Press, 1959.
Martz, Mary Jeanne Reid. The Central American Soccer War:
Historical Patterns and Internal Dynamics of OAS Settlement
Procedures. (Papers in International Studies, Latin
American Series, No. 4.) Athens: Center for International
Studies, Ohio University, 1978.
Maurer, Harry. "The Priests of Honduras, Radical Agitators,"
Nation, 222, March 6, 1976, 266-69.
Mecham, J. Lloyd. The United States and Inter-American
Security, 1889-1960. Austin: University of Texas Press,
1961.
Meza, V�ctor. Historia del movimiento obrero Hondure�o.
Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras, 1980.
Millett, Richard L. "The State Department's Navy: A History of the
Special Service Squadron, 1920-1940," American
Neptune, 35, April 1975, 118-38.
------. "The United States and Central America." Pages 11-44 in
United States, Congress, 97th, 1st Session, Joint Economic
Committee, The Political Economy of the Western
Hemisphere: Selected Issues for United States Policy.
Washington: GPO, 1981.
Morris, James A. The Honduran Plan, Pol�tico de Unidad
Nacional, 1971-1972: Its Origins and Demise. El Paso:
Center for Inter-American Studies, University of Texas at El
Paso, 1975.
------. "Honduras: How Long an Oasis of Peace?" Caribbean
Review, 10, No. 1, Winter 1981, 38-41.
Morris, James A., and Steve C. Ropp. "Corporatism and Dependent
Development: A Honduran Case Study," Latin American
Research Review, 12, No. 2, Summer 1977, 27-68.
M�ller, Gene Alan. "The Church in Poverty: Bishops, Bourbons, and
Tithes in Spanish Honduras, 1700-1821." (Ph.D. dissertation.)
Lawrence: Department of History, University of Kansas, 1982.
Munro, Dana G. The Five Republics of Central America;
Their Political and Economic Development and Their
Relations with the United States. New York: Russell and
Russell, 1967.
------. Intervention and Dollar Diplomacy in the Caribbean,
1900-1921. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964.
------. The United States and the Caribbean Republics, 1921-
1933. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974.
Palmer, Frederick. Central America and Its Problems. New
York: Moffat, Yard, 1913.
Paredes, Lucas. Drama pol�tico de Honduras. Mexico, D.F.:
Editorial Latinoamericano, 1958.
Parker, Franklin D. The Central American Republics. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1964.
Pastor, Rodolfo. "El ocaso de los cacicazgos: Historia de la crisis
del sistema pol�tico hondure�o," Foro Internacional
[Mexico], 26, No. 1, 1985, 16-30.
------. Historia de Centroam�rica. Mexico, D.F.: Colegio
de M�xico, 1988.
Pearson, Neale J. "Honduras." Pages 439-54 in Jack W. Hopkins
(ed.), Latin American and Caribbean Contemporary Record,
1: 1981-82. New York: Holmes and Meier, 1983.
------. "Honduras: The Impact of the 1980 Constituent Assembly
Elections." (Conference paper delivered at the joint meeting
of the Latin American Studies Association and the Midwest
Association for Latin American Studies, October 17-19, 1980.)
Bloomington, Indiana: October 1980.
------. "The Impact of the U.S. Military Presence on Honduran
Politics," Texas Journal of Political Studies, 8, No.
2, Spring/Summer 1986, 77-107.
------. "Peasant Pressure Groups and Agrarian Reform in Honduras
under Civilian and Military Regimes, 1962-1973." (Conference
paper delivered at Annual Meeting of Rocky Mountain Social
Science Association, April 20-25 1974.) El Paso, Texas: April
1974.
P�rez Brignoli, H�ctor. "Econom�a y sociedad en Honduras durante el
siglo xix," Estudios Sociales Centroamericanos [San
Jos�, Costa Rica], 2, No. 6, September-December 1973, 51-82.
Posas, Mario. Lucha ideol�gica y organizaci�n sindical en
Honduras, 1954-1965. Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras,
1980.
------. Luchas del movimiento obrero hondure�o. San Jos�,
Costa Rica: Editorial Universitaria Centroamericana, 1981.
Robicsek, Francis. Cop�n: Home of the Mayan Gods. New
York: Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, 1972.
Rodr�guez, Mario. A Palmerstonian Diplomat in Central
America. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1964.
Ropp, Steve C. "The Honduran Army in the Sociopolitical Evolution
of the Honduran State," The Americas, 30, No. 4,
April 1974, 504-28.
Rosenberg, Mark B. "Honduras: The Reluctant Democracy,"
Current History, 85, December 1986, 417-20, 438, 448.
Ruhl, J. Mark. "Agrarian Structure and Political Stability in
Honduras," Journal of Interamerican Studies and World
Affairs, 26, No. 1, February 1984, 33-68.
------. "The Honduras Agrarian Reform under Suazo Cordova, 1982-
85," Inter-American Economic Affairs, 39, Autumn
1985, 68-130.
Salom�n, Leticia. Militarismo y reformismo en Honduras.
Tegucigalpa: Editorial Guaymuras, 1982.
Sauer, Carl Ortwin. The Early Spanish Main. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1966.
Scholes, Walter V., and Marie V. Scholes. The Foreign Policies
of the Taft Administration. Columbia: University of
Missouri Press, 1970.
Schulz, Donald E. How Honduras Escaped Revolutionary
Violence. Washington: United States Army War College,
1992.
Schulz, Donald E., and Deborah Loff. "The United States, Honduras,
and the Crisis in Central America," Scandinavian Journal
of Development Alternatives, 6, December 1987, 5-62.
Squier, E. George. Notes on Central America: Particularly the
States of Honduras and El Salvador. New York: AMS Press,
1971. Originally published as Die staaten von Central-
Amerika, insebondere Honduras, San Salvador und die
Moskitokuste (Leipzig: G. Sanf, 1865).
Stansifer, Charles L. "Application of the Tobar Doctrine to Central
America," The Americas, 23, No. 3, January 1967, 251-
72.
------. "E. George Squier and the Honduras Inter-Oceanic Railway
Project," Hispanic American Historical Review, 46,
February 1966, 1-27.
Stokes, William S. Honduras: An Area Study in Government.
Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1950.
------. "Honduras: Dilemma of Development," Current
History, 42, No. 246, February 1962, 83-88.
------. "Honduras: Problems and Prospects," Current
History, 50, No. 293, January 1966, 22-26.
Stone, Doris. "Synthesis of Lower Central American Ethnohistory."
Pages 209-33 in Gordon F. Ekholm and Gordon R. Willey (eds.),
Handbook of Middle American Indians, 4: Archaeological
Frontiers and External Connections. Austin: University of
Texas Press, 1966.
Thompson, J. Eric S. The Rise and Fall of Maya
Civilization. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1954.
West, Robert C., and John P. Augelli. Middle America: Its Lands
and Peoples. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,
1966.
Williams, Mary W. Anglo-American Isthmian Diplomacy, 1815-
1915. Washington: American Historical Association, 1916.
Woodward, Ralph Lee, Jr. Central America: A Nation
Divided. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.
Woodward, Ralph Lee, Jr. (ed.). Central America: Historical
Perspectives on the Contemporary Crises. New York:
Greenwood Press, 1988.
Wortman, Miles L. Government and Society in Central America,
1680-1840. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.
Wright, Theodore P., Jr. "Honduras: A Case Study of United States
Support of Free Elections in Central America," Hispanic
American Historical Review, 40, No. 2, May 1960, 212-23.
Yankelevich, Pablo (ed.). Honduras. Mexico D.F.: Instituto
de Investigaciones Dr. Jos� Mar�a Mora, 1990.
Young, Arthur A. "Reforma financiera en Honduras." Pages 1-68 in
Banco Central de Honduras, Historia financiera de
Honduras. Tegucigalpa: 1957.
Zamora Castellanos, Pedro. Vida militar de Centro Am�rica,
1 and 2. (2d ed.) Guatemala City: Editorial del Ej�rcito,
1967.
CITATION: Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. The Country Studies Series. Published 1988-1999.
Please note: This text comes from the Country Studies Program, formerly the Army Area Handbook Program. The Country Studies Series presents a description and analysis of the historical setting and the social, economic, political, and national security systems and institutions of countries throughout the world.
TRY USING CTRL-F on your keyboard to find the appropriate section of text