Since the signing of the Treaty of Ryswick between the kingdoms of
Spain and France in 1697, the island of Hispaniola (La Isla Espa�ola)
has played host to two separate and distinct societies that we now know
as the nations of Haiti and the Dominican Republic. At first encounter,
and without the benefit of historical background and context, most
students or observers find it incongruous that two such disparate
nations--one speaking French and Creole, the other Spanish--should
coexist within such limited confines. When viewed in light of the bitter
struggle among European colonial powers for wealth and influence both on
the continent and in the New World, however, the phenomenon becomes less
puzzling. By the late seventeenth century, Spain was a declining power.
Although that country would maintain its vast holdings in mainland North
America and South America, Spain found itself hard pressed by British,
Dutch, and French forces in the Caribbean. The Treaty of Ryswick was but
one result of this competition, as the British eventually took Jamaica
and established a foothold in Central America. The French eventually
proved the value of Caribbean colonization, in an economic as well as a
maritime and strategic sense, by developing modern-day Haiti, then known
as Saint-Domingue, into the most productive colony in the Western
Hemisphere, if not the world.
Although the other European powers envied the French their island
jewel, Saint-Domingue eventually was lost not to a colonial rival, but
to an idea. That idea, inspired by the American Revolution and the
French Revolution, was freedom; its power was such as to convince a
bitterly oppressed population of African slaves that anything--reprisal,
repression, even death-- was preferable to its denial. This positive
impulse, liberally leavened with hatred for the white men, who had
seized them, shipped them like cargo across the ocean, tortured and
abused them, and forced women into concubinage and men into arduous
labor, impelled the black population of Saint-Domingue to an achievement
still unmatched in history: the overthrow of a slaveholding colonial
power and the establishment of a revolutionary black republic.
The saga of the Haitian Revolution is so dramatic that it is
surprising that it has never served as the scenario for a Hollywood
production. Its images are varied and intense: the voodoo ceremony and
pact sealed in the Bois Cayman (Alligator Woods) in anticipation of the
slave revolt of 1791; the blazing, bloody revolt itself; foreign
intervention by British and Spanish forces; the charismatic figure of
Fran�ois-Dominique Toussaint Louverture, his rise and fateful decision
to switch his allegiance from Spain to France, his surprisingly
effective command of troops in the field, the relative restraint with
which he treated white survivors and prisoners, the competence of his
brief stint as ruler; the French expedition of 1802, of which Toussaint
exclaimed, "All France has come to invade us"; Toussaint's
betrayal and seizure by the French; and the ensuing revolution led by
Jean-Jacque Dessalines, Henri (Henry) Christophe, and Alexandre P�tion.
Given the distinctive and auspicious origins of the Haitian republic,
there is some irony in that the Dominicans commemorate as their
independence day the date of their overthrow of Haitian rule. The
Dominican revolt, however, came as a response to annexation by a Haitian
state that had passed from the promise of orderly administration under
Toussaint to the hard-handed despotism of Dessalines and had then
experienced division, both racial and political, between the forces of
Christophe and P�tion. By the time of its conquest of Santo Domingo
(later to become the Dominican Republic), Haiti had come under the
comparatively stable, but uninspired, stewardship of Jean-Pierre Boyer.
Although viewed, both at the time and today, by most Dominicans as a
crude and oppressive state dominated by the military, the Haiti that
occupied both eastern and western Hispaniola from 1822 to 1844 can
itself be seen as a victim of international political and economic
isolation. Because they either resented the existence of a black
republic or feared a similar uprising in their own slave-owning regions,
the European colonial powers and the United States shunned relations
with Haiti; in the process, they contributed to the establishment of an
impoverished society, ruled by the military, guided by the gun rather
than the ballot, and controlled by a small, mostly mulatto, ruling group
that lived well, while their countrymen either struggled to eke out a
subsistence-level existence on small plots of land or flocked to the
banners of regional strongmen in the seemingly never-ending contest for
power. To be sure, the French colonial experience had left the Haitians
completely unprepared for orderly democratic self-government, but the
isolation of the post-independence period assured the exclusion of
liberalizing influences that might have guided Haiti along a somewhat
different path of political and economic development. By the same token,
however, it may be that Western governments of the time, and even those
of the early twentieth century, were incapable of dealing with a black
republic on an equal basis. The United States occupation of Haiti
(1915-34) certainly brought little of lasting value to the country's
political culture or institutions, in part because the Americans saw the
Haitians as uncivilized lackeys and treated them as such.
Both nations of Hispaniola share--along with much of the developing
world--the strong tendency toward political organization built upon the
personalistic followings of strongmen, or caudillos, rather than on more
legalistic bases, such as constitutionalism. This similarity in
political culture helps to explain the chronologically staggered
parallels between the brutal regimes of Rafael Le�nidas Trujillo Molina
(1930-61) in the Dominican Republic and that of the Duvaliers--Fran�ois
Duvalier (1957-71) and his son, Jean-Claude Duvalier (1971-86)-- in
Haiti. Both regimes lasted for approximately thirty years; both were
headed by nonideological despots; both regimes sustained themselves in
power by employing terror and ruthlessly suppressing dissent; both drew
the ire of an international community that ultimately proved incapable
of directly forcing them from power; and both left their countries mired
in political chaos and internal conflict upon their demise. One may only
hope that the unstable situation in Haiti after the fall of the Duvalier
regime will resolve itself without further analogy to Dominican
history--that is, without a civil war. As of late 1990, however, the
outcome of the situation remained extremely unpredictable.
Lieutenant General Prosper Avril took power in Haiti in September
1988, ousting the highly unpopular military regime led by Lieutenant
General Henri Namphy. Avril, a product of the Haitian military tradition
and the Duvalierist system, initially gave assurances that he would
serve only as a transitional figure on the road to representative
democracy. Whatever his personal feelings or motivations, however, Avril
by his actions proved himself to be simply another corrupt Haitian
military strongman. Having scheduled elections for 1990, he arrested and
expelled leading political figures and declared a state of siege in
January of that year. These actions triggered demonstrations, protests,
and rioting among a population weary of exploitation and insincere
promises of reform. Despite his public rhetoric, Avril presided over a
military institution that perpetuated the Duvalierist traditions of
extortion, graft, and price-gouging through state-owned enterprises. At
the same time, the military made no substantive effort to address the
problem of political violence. By early 1990, Haitians had had enough of
promises; many decided to take action on their own, much as they had
during the uprising of 1985 that swept Jean-Claude Duvalier from power.
Violent demonstrations began in earnest in early March 1990,
ostensibly in response to the army's fatal shooting of an eleven-
year-old girl in Petit Go�ve. Streets blazed across Haiti as
demonstrators ignited tires and automobiles, chanted anti-Avril slogans,
and fought with army troops. Avril soon recognized the untenable nature
of his position; the United States ambassador reportedly influenced the
general's decision to step down in a private meeting held on March 12.
Avril's flight from Haiti on a United States Air Force transport added
his name to a long list of failed Haitian strongmen, and it left the
country under the guidance of yet another military officer, Major
General (subsequently promoted to Lieutenant General) H�rard Abraham.
Consultations among civilian political figures produced a provisional
government headed by a judge of the Court of Cassation (supreme court),
Ertha Pascal-Trouillot, a woman little-known outside legal circles.
Judge Pascal Trouillot reportedly accepted the post of provisional
president after three other supreme court judges declined; she was sworn
in on March 13. Appointed along with her was a nineteen-member Council
of State, made up of prominent civic and political leaders. Although the
new government announced no clear definitions of the powers of the
council vis-�-vis the provisional president, some reports indicated
that the president could exercise independent authority in some areas.
The most compelling reality, however, was that all powers of the
provisional government had been granted by the Haitian Armed Forces
(Forces Arm�es d'Ha�ti--FAd'H), which would provide the government's
only mandate--and perhaps its major political constituency--until valid
popular elections could be held.
The Conseil Electoral Permanent (Permanent Electoral Council- -CEP)
scheduled local, legislative, and presidential elections for sometime
between November 4 and November 29, 1990. The prospects for their
successful implementation, however, appeared highly problematical at
best. Seemingly unchecked political violence, which conjured up for many
the horrible images of the bloody election day of November 1987,
presented the major obstacle to free and fair balloting. Negotiations
between the FAd'H and the CEP sought to establish security mechanisms
that would prevent a recurrence of the 1987 tragedy. Popular confidence
in these efforts, however, did not appear to be very great.
In a larger sense, the utter absence of any democratic tradition, or
framework, in Haiti stacked the odds heavily against a smooth
governmental transition. Economist Mats Lundahl has referred to Haiti as
a hysteretic state, "not simply one where the past has shaped the
present, but also one where history constitutes one of the strongest
obstacles to change." Several conditions prevailing in Haiti gave
substance to this definition. Among the wide array of personalistic
political parties, only three--Marc Bazin's Movement for the
Installation of Democracy in Haiti (Mouvement pour l'Instouration de la
D�mocratie en Ha�ti-- MIDH), Serge Gilles's National Progressive
Revolutionary Haitian Party (Parti Progressiste R�volutionnaire Ha�tien--Ponpra),
and Sylvio C. Claude's Christian Democrat Party of Haiti (Parti National
Chr�tien d'Haiti--PDCH)--displayed any semblance of coherent programs
or disciplined party apparatus. The odyssey of the Haitian military,
from dominant power before the Duvaliers to subordinate status under the
dynastic dictatorship, left uncertain the intentions of the FAd'H under
Abraham's leadership. The return of such infamous Duvalierist cronies as
former interior minister Roger LaFontant and persistent rumors that
Jean-Claude himself was contemplating a return to the nation he had bled
dry for fifteen years provoked outrage among a population that wanted
nothing so much as to rid itself of the remaining vestiges of that
predatory regime. According to some observers, internal conditions had
approached, by the late summer of 1990, a sort of critical mass, which,
if not defused by way of fair and free elections, could explode into
generalized and ultimately futile violence.
In July one of the more responsible political leaders, Sylvio Claude,
exhorted Haitians to block the return of undesirables by seizing the
international airport outside Port-au-Prince. In a speech on Radio
Nationale, he declared, "Instead of letting [the army] go kill you
later, make them kill you now." Among the figures targeted by
Claude for such action was former president Leslie F. Manigat, not
previously considered a controversial figure by most observers. Perhaps
in response to such rabble- rousing, the provisional government
announced on August 1 that Manigat would be barred from returning to his
native Haiti.
In late July, the Council of State issued a communiqu�, laying down
four conditions that it deemed necessary for holding successful
elections. First, effective legal action had to be initiated against
those who had participated in the November 1987 attacks and other
political murders; second, a general climate of public security needed
to be established in order to encourage voters to go to the polls;
third, the public administration should be purged of entrenched, corrupt
bureaucrats; and fourth, some checks had to be established over the
powers of the rural section chiefs (chefs de section), so that
the rural population could vote in an atmosphere free of coercion and
intimidation. It was not clear what action the Council would take if
these conditions had not been met by November.
In the Dominican Republic, events unfolded along a much more
predictable path. Although Dominican politics were boisterous, and
physical clashes--occasionally punctuated by gunfire--between the
members of contending political parties were not unusual, the democratic
system established after the 1965 civil war and the United States
intervention continued to function with comparative efficiency
(especially when compared with that of Haiti). The elections of May 16,
1990, however, demonstrated the manifold weaknesses of this system. The
most glaring example of the lack of institutionalization in Dominican
politics was that the major contenders for the presidency were the same
two men who had opposed each other in the elections of 1966, namely,
Juan Bosch Gavi�o and incumbent Joaqu�n Balaguer Ricardo. Despite
almost a quarter of a century of relatively free political organization
and competition, the two modern-day caudillos, both octogenarians, still
sallied into the arena flying their own personalistic banners rather
than those of truly established parties. The one party that had
displayed some level of institutionalization, the Dominican
Revolutionary Party (Partido Revolucionario Dominicano--PRD), had split
into antagonistic factions--each with its own caudillo--and never
presented a serious challenge to the two elder statesmen.
The elections themselves, like most during the post-civil war era,
were lively, controversial, and bitterly contested. Despite debilitating
national problems, such as a chronic shortage of electricity, rising
inflation, and persistent poverty, President Balaguer retained enough
support in a presidential race contested by sixteen political parties
(some running in coalition) to eke out a narrow victory over Bosch. The
final tally showed Balaguer with 678,268 votes against Bosch's 653,423.
Like most Dominican politicians before him, Bosch did not accept defeat
with magnanimity; he lashed out at Balaguer and the Central Electoral
Board, accusing both of fraud during balloting that impartial observers
had judged to be fair and orderly. Bosch's early public statements
exhorted his followers to stage public protests against the alleged
electoral fraud. Early fears of widespread street violence initiated by
disgruntled Bosch supporters proved unfounded, however, and Balaguer's
reelection was confirmed by the Board on June 12, 1990.
Although it traditionally bends a little around election time, the
Dominican democratic system showed few signs of breaking completely.
Economic developments, however, will exercise a decisive impact on the
nation's future stability. In that regard, Balaguer's reelection could
prove to be a storm warning for the republic. At eighty-one years of
age, Balaguer reportedly retained his enthusiasm for hands-on
administration of government policy. The major economic aspects of that
policy, however, did not promise a significant degree of improvement in
the short term. Balaguer, since his days as a prot�g� of Trujillo, has
believed in the liberal application of funds to public works
projects--the construction of schools, housing, public buildings--in
order to boost employment and purchase political support. Such
gratuitous expenditures, however, largely served to exacerbate the
government's fiscal problems, while masking to only a limited degree the
consistently high levels of unemployment prevailing in the republic.
Another tenet of Balaguer's economic creed was a refusal to submit to an
economic adjustment program dictated by the International Monetary Fund
(IMF). By ruling out an IMF-mandated program, Balaguer avoided further
short-term austerity measures, such as devaluation and price increases
on subsidized items; this enabled him to stand on a platform of economic
nationalism and to proclaim his opposition to economic hardship imposed
from abroad (that is, from the United States, which is strongly
identified with the IMF throughout Latin America). In the long run,
however, his obstinacy diminished Dominican standing with foreign
creditors, and it limited any new infusions of capital needed to sustain
the impressive growth of nontraditional exports achieved during the
latter 1980s. This, in turn, would hinder the accumulation of foreign
exchange needed to finance the imports required to sustain industrial
development. Moreover, although an austerity program undoubtedly would
pinch still further an already hard-pressed population, it might also
help to balance the budget, to stabilize domestic prices, and to boost
exports, all highly desirable potential results.
If the Dominican situation demonstrated anything to Haitians, it was
that democracy is not a panacea for domestic turmoil. As Winston
Churchill observed, it is the worst political system "except for
all the others." Since Trujillo's death, Dominicans have struggled
to adjust to an imperfect system, under less than ideal conditions; the
final outcome of this process is still in doubt. For Haitians, the small
step represented by valid elections could be their first lurch along a
much longer road to peace and stability.
***
In the months following completion of research and writing of this
book, significant political developments occurred in Haiti. On December
16, 1990, over 60 percent of registered voters turned out to elect
political neophyte Jean-Bertrand Aristide president of Haiti. Aristide,
a Roman Catholic priest and an advocate of liberation theology,
registered an overwhelming first-round victory against a number of
opponents. His popular identification as an outspoken opponent of the
regime of Jean- Claude Duvalier apparently moved some 67 percent of
voters to select Aristide as their leader. More traditional politicians
such as Marc Bazin, Louis Dejoie, and Silvio Claude trailed badly,
reflecting their lack of appeal beyond the upper and middle classes.
Aristide's victory came as a result of what was arguably the first free
and fair election in Haitian history.
Right-wing backlash against the election of the radical leftist
Aristide expressed itself in a coup attempt led by Duvalierist Roger
Lafontant on January 6, 1991. Assisted by a small contingent of army
personnel, Lafontant seized the National Palace, took prisoner
Provisional President Pascal-Trouillot, and announced his control of the
government over the state-run television station. Lafontant's
pronouncement turned out to be decidedly premature, however, as loyalist
army forces stormed the palace twelve hours later on the orders of FAd'H
commander Abraham. Lafontant and those of his fellow conspirators who
survived the fighting were captured and incarcerated. The coup also
ignited violent street demonstrations in which mobs lynched at least
seven people they accused of Duvalierist ties or sympathies. Violence
continued in the interim between the elections and the presidential
inauguration on February 7, 1991. Particularly intense anti-Duvalierist
demonstrations took place on the night of January 26, leaving more than
a dozen dead. On the night of February 1, 1991, suspected Duvalierists
set fire to an orphanage in Port-au-Prince administered by Aristide.
Aristide's inauguration on February 7, 1991, was a gala event,
befitting its historic nature. As expected, the new president delivered
a spellbinding inaugural address. In it, he renounced his US$10,000 a
month salary as a "scandal in a country where people cannot
eat." Although the address was short on specifics of policy, its
tone was one of gratitude and support for the poverty-afflicted
constituency that had provided such a striking electoral mandate. The
address was also conciliatory with regard to the military. Aristide
described a "wedding between the army and the people," and
hinted that the army would henceforth function as a public security
force in order to lessen the threat emanating from right-wing forces
such as those directed by Lafontant.
Beyond his rhetorical outreach to the rank and file, Aristide moved
quickly to shore up his rule in the face of possible opposition from
within the officer corps of the FAd'H.In his inaugural address, he
called on General Abraham to retire six of the eight highest-ranking
generals as well as the colonel who commanded the Presidential Guard.
The appeal reflected Aristide's surprisingly powerful position, based on
his overwhelming electoral victory and his demonstrated popular support,
which extended even to the ranks of the military. The fact that Abraham
complied with the request confirmed the already rather obvious disarray
of the FAd'H and the general unwillingness of the institution to
reassume political power in Haiti.
On February 9, Aristide proposed Ren� Pr�val as Haiti's prime
minister. Pr�val, a Belgian-trained agronomist and close associate of
the president, was subsequently approved by the National Assembly.
Although Aristide won a smashing personal victory in his presidential
race, no one party or movement achieved a majority in the assembly. This
fact promised a certain degree of stalemate and inertia in the
legislative process under the Aristide administration. Such a situation
did not seem conducive to the development of programs to deal
effectively with the country's many severe problems. At the same time,
however, an assembly based on coalition and compromise should serve to
check any temptation by the new government toward heavy-handed or even
authoritarian rule. In any case, the assembly was a new institution in a
new government in what many hoped would be a new and democratic Haiti.
Haiti - History
The island of Hispaniola (La Isla Espa�ola), which today is occupied
by the nations of Haiti and the Dominican Republic, was one of several
landfalls Christopher Columbus made during his first voyage to the New
World in 1492. Columbus established a makeshift settlement on the north
coast, which he dubbed Navidad (Christmas), after his flagship, the Santa
Mar�a, struck a coral reef and foundered near the site of
present-day Cap Ha�tien.
The Taino Indian (or Arawak) inhabitants referred to their homeland
by many names, but they most commonly used Ayti, or Hayti
(mountainous). Initially hospitable toward the Spaniards, these natives
responded violently to the newcomers' intolerance and abuse. When
Columbus returned to Hispaniola on his second voyage in 1493, he found
that Navidad had been razed and its inhabitants, slain. But the Old
World's interest in expansion and its drive to spread Roman Catholicism
were not easily deterred; Columbus established a second settlement,
Isabela, farther to the east.
Hispaniola, or Santo Domingo, as it became known under Spanish
dominion, became the first outpost of the Spanish Empire. The initial
expectations of plentiful and easily accessible gold reserves proved
unfounded, but the island still became important as a seat of colonial
administration, a starting point for conquests of other lands, and a
laboratory to develop policies for governing new possessions. It was in
Santo Domingo that the Spanish crown introduced the system of repartimiento,
whereby peninsulares (Spanish-born persons residing in the New
World) received large grants of land and the right to compel labor from
the Indians who inhabited that land.
Columbus, Santo Domingo's first administrator, and his brother
Bartolom� Columbus fell out of favor with the majority of the colony's
settlers, as a result of jealousy and avarice, and then also with the
crown because of their failure to maintain order. In 1500 a royal
investigator ordered both to be imprisoned briefly in a Spanish prison.
The colony's new governor, Nicol�s de Ovando, laid the groundwork for
the island's development. During his tenure, the repartimiento
system gave way to the encomienda
system under which all land was considered the property
of the crown. The system also granted stewardship of tracts to encomenderos,
who were entitled to employ (or, in practice, to enslave) Indian labor.
The Taino Indian population of Santo Domingo fared poorly under
colonial rule. The exact size of the island's indigenous population in
1492 has never been determined, but observers at the time produced
estimates that ranged from several thousand to several million. An
estimate of 3 million, which is almost certainly an exaggeration, has
been attributed to Bishop Bartolom� de Las Casas. According to all
accounts, however, there were hundreds of thousands of indigenous people
on the island. By 1550 only 150 Indians lived on the island. Forced
labor, abuse, diseases against which the Indians had no immunity, and
the growth of the mestizo (mixed European and Indian) population all
contributed to the elimination of the Taino and their culture.
Several years before the Taino were gone, Santo Domingo had lost its
position as the preeminent Spanish colony in the New World. Its lack of
mineral riches condemned it to neglect by the mother country, especially
after the conquest of New Spain (Mexico). In 1535 the Viceroyalty of New
Spain, which included Mexico and the Central American isthmus,
incorporated Santo Domingo, the status of which dwindled still further
after the conquest of the rich kingdom of the Incas in Peru. Agriculture
became the mainstay of the island's economy, but the disorganized nature
of agricultural production did not approach the kind of intense
productivity that was to characterize the colony under French rule.
Haiti - FRENCH COLONIALISM
The Slave Rebellion of 1791
Violent conflicts between white colonists and black slaves were
common in Saint-Domingue. Bands of runaway slaves, known as maroons (marrons),
entrenched themselves in bastions in the colony's mountains and forests,
from which they harried white-owned plantations both to secure
provisions and weaponry and to avenge themselves against the
inhabitants. As their numbers grew, these bands, sometimes consisting of
thousands of people, began to carry out hit-and-run attacks throughout
the colony. This guerrilla warfare, however, lacked centralized
organization and leadership. The most famous maroon leader was Fran�ois
Macandal, whose six-year rebellion (1751-57) left an estimated 6,000
dead. Reportedly a boko, or voodoo sorcerer, Macandal drew from
African traditions and religions to motivate his followers. The French
burned him at the stake in Cap Fran�ais in 1758. Popular accounts of
his execution that say the stake snapped during his execution have
enhanced his legendary stature.
Many Haitians point to the maroons' attacks as the first
manifestation of a revolt against French rule and the slaveholding
system. The attacks certainly presaged the 1791 slave rebellion, which
evolved into the Haitian Revolution. They also marked the beginning of a
martial tradition for blacks, just as service in the colonial militia
had done for the gens de couleur. The maroons, however, seemed
incapable of staging a broad-based insurrection on their own. Although
challenged and vexed by the maroons' actions, colonial authorities
effectively repelled the attacks, especially with help from the gens
de couleur, who were probably forced into cooperating.
The arrangement that enabled the whites and the landed gens de
couleur to preserve the stability of the slaveholding system was
unstable. In an economic sense, the system worked for both groups. The gens
de couleur, however, had aspirations beyond the accumulation of
goods. They desired equality with white colonists, and many of them
desired power. The events set in motion in 1789 by the French Revolution
shook up, and eventually shattered, the arrangement.
The National Assembly in Paris required the white Colonial Assembly
to grant suffrage to the landed and tax-paying gens de couleur.
(The white colonists had had a history of ignoring French efforts to
improve the lot of the black and the mulatto populations.) The Assembly
refused, leading to the first mulatto rebellion in Saint-Domingue. The
rebellion, led by Vincent Og� in 1790, failed when the white militia
reinforced itself with a corps of black volunteers. (The white elite was
constantly prepared to use racial tension between blacks and mulattoes
to advantage.) Og�'s rebellion was a sign of broader unrest in
Saint-Domingue.
A slave rebellion of 1791 finally toppled the colony. Launched in
August of that year, the revolt represented the culmination of a
protracted conspiracy among black leaders. According to accounts of the
rebellion that have been told through the years, Fran�ois-Dominique
Toussaint Louverture helped plot the uprising, although this claim has
never been substantiated. Among the rebellion's leaders were Boukman, a
maroon and voodoo houngan (priest); Georges Biassou, who later
made Toussaint his aide; Jean-Fran�ois, who subsequently commanded
forces, along with Biassou and Toussaint, under the Spanish flag; and
Jeannot, the bloodthirstiest of them all. These leaders sealed their
compact with a voodoo ceremony conducted by Boukman in the Bois Cayman
(Alligator Woods) in early August 1791. On August 22, a little more than
a week after the ceremony, the uprising of their black followers began.
The carnage that the slaves wreaked in northern settlements, such as
Acul, Limb�, Flaville, and Le Normand, revealed the simmering fury of
an oppressed people. The bands of slaves slaughtered every white person
they encountered. As their standard, they carried a pike with the
carcass of an impaled white baby. Accounts of the rebellion describe
widespread torching of property, fields, factories, and anything else
that belonged to, or served, slaveholders. The inferno is said to have
burned almost continuously for months.
News of the slaves' uprising quickly reached Cap Fran�ais. Reprisals
against nonwhites were swift and every bit as brutal as the atrocities
committed by the slaves. Although outnumbered, the inhabitants of Le Cap
(the local diminutive for Cap Fran�ais) were well-armed and prepared to
defend themselves against the tens of thousands of blacks who descended
upon the port city. Despite their voodoo-inspired heroism, the ex-slaves
fell in large numbers to the colonists' firepower and were forced to
withdraw. The rebellion left an estimated 10,000 blacks and 2,000 whites
dead and more than 1,000 plantations sacked and razed.
Even though it failed, the slave rebellion at Cap Fran�ais set in
motion events that culminated in the Haitian Revolution. Mulatto forces
under the capable leadership of Andr� Rigaud, Alexandre P�tion, and
others clashed with white militiamen in the west and the south (where,
once again, whites recruited black slaves to their cause). Sympathy with
the Republican cause in France inspired the mulattoes. Sentiment in the
National Assembly vacillated, but it finally favored the enfranchisement
of gens de couleur and the enforcement of equal rights. Whites,
who had had little respect for royal governance in the past, now rallied
behind the Bourbons and rejected the radical egalitarian notions of the
French revolutionaries. Commissioners from the French Republic,
dispatched in 1792 to Saint-Domingue, pledged their limited support to
the gens de couleur in the midst of an increasingly anarchic
situation. In various regions of the colony, black slaves rebelled
against white colonists, mulattoes battled white levies, and black
royalists opposed both whites and mulattoes. Foreign interventionists
found these unstable conditions irresistible; Spanish and British
involvement in the unrest in Saint-Domingue opened yet another chapter
in the revolution.
Haiti - Toussaint Louverture
Social historian James G. Leyburn has said of Toussaint Louverture
that "what he did is more easily told than what he was."
Although some of Toussaint's correspondence and papers remain, they
reveal little of his deepest motivations in the struggle for Haitian
autonomy. Born sometime between 1743 and 1746 in Saint-Domingue,
Toussaint belonged to the small, fortunate class of slaves employed by
humane masters as personal servants. While serving as a house servant
and coachman, Toussaint received the tutelage that helped him become one
of the few literate black revolutionary leaders.
Upon hearing of the slave uprising, Toussaint took pains to secure
safe expatriation of his master's family. It was only then that he
joined Biassou's forces, where his intelligence, skill in strategic and
tactical planning (based partly on his reading of works by Julius Caesar
and others), and innate leadership ability brought him quickly to
prominence.
Le Cap fell to French forces, who were reinforced by thousands of
blacks in April 1793. Black forces had joined the French against the
royalists on the promise of freedom. Indeed, in August Commissioner L�ger-F�licit�
Sonthonax abolished slavery in the colony.
Two black leaders who warily refused to commit their forces to
France, however, were Jean-Fran�ois and Biassou. Believing allegiance
to a king would be more secure than allegiance to a republic, these
leaders accepted commissions from Spain. The Spanish deployed forces in
coordination with these indigenous blacks to take the north of
Saint-Domingue. Toussaint, who had taken up the Spanish banner in
February 1793, came to command his own forces independently of Biassou's
army. By the year's end, Toussaint had cut a swath through the north,
had swung south to Gona�ves, and effectively controlled north-central
Saint- Domingue.
Some historians believe that Spain and Britain had reached an
informal arrangement to divide the French colony between them-- Britain
to take the south and Spain, the north. British forces landed at J�r�mie
and M�le Saint-Nicolas (the M�le). They besieged Port-au-Prince (or
Port R�publicain, as it was known under the Republic) and took it in
June 1794. The Spanish had launched a two-pronged offensive from the
east. French forces checked Spanish progress toward Port-au-Prince in
the south, but the Spanish pushed rapidly through the north, most of
which they occupied by 1794. Spain and Britain were poised to seize
Saint- Domingue, but several factors foiled their grand design. One
factor was illness. The British in particular fell victim to tropical
disease, which thinned their ranks far more quickly than combat against
the French. Southern forces led by Rigaud and northern forces led by
another mulatto commander, Villatte, also forestalled a complete victory
by the foreign forces. These uncertain conditions positioned Toussaint's
centrally located forces as the key to victory or defeat. On May 6,
1794, Toussaint made a decision that sealed the fate of a nation.
After arranging for his family to flee from the city of Santo
Domingo, Toussaint pledged his support to France. Confirmation of the
National Assembly's decision on February 4, 1794, to abolish slavery
appears to have been the strongest influence over Toussaint's actions.
Although the Spanish had promised emancipation, they showed no signs of
keeping their word in the territories that they controlled, and the
British had reinstated slavery in the areas they occupied. If
emancipation wasToussaint's goal, he had no choice but to cast his lot
with the French.
In several raids against his former allies, Toussaint took the
Artibonite region and retired briefly to Mirebalais. As Rigaud's forces
achieved more limited success in the south, the tide clearly swung in
favor of the French Republicans. Perhaps the key event at this point was
the July 22, 1794, peace agreement between France and Spain. The
agreement was not finalized until the signing of the Treaty of Basel the
following year. The accord directed Spain to cede its holdings on
Hispaniola to France. The move effectively denied supplies, funding, and
avenues of retreat to combatants under the Spanish aegis. The armies of
Jean-Fran�ois and Biassou disbanded, and many flocked to the standard
of Toussaint, the remaining black commander of stature.
In March 1796, Toussaint rescued the French commander, General
Etienne-Maynard Laveaux, from a mulatto-led effort to depose him as the
primary colonial authority. To express his gratitude, Laveaux appointed
Toussaint lieutenant governor of Saint-Domingue. With this much power
over the affairs of his homeland, Toussaint was in a position to gain
more. Toussaint distrusted the intentions of all foreign parties--as
well as those of the mulattoes--regarding the future of slavery; he
believed that only black leadership could assure the continuation of an
autonomous Saint-Domingue. He set out to consolidate his political and
military positions, and he undercut the positions of the French and the
resentful gens de couleur.
A new group of French commissioners appointed Toussaint commander in
chief of all French forces on the island. From this position of
strength, he resolved to move quickly and decisively to establish an
autonomous state under black rule. He expelled Sonthonax, the leading
French commissioner, who had proclaimed the abolition of slavery, and
concluded an agreement to end hostilities with Britain. He sought to
secure Rigaud's allegiance and thus to incorporate the majority of
mulattoes into his national project, but his plan was thwarted by the
French, who saw in Rigaud their last opportunity to retain dominion over
the colony.
Once again, racial animosity drove events in Saint-Domingue, as
Toussaint's predominantly black forces clashed with Rigaud's mulatto
army. Foreign intrigue and manipulation prevailed on both sides of the
conflict. Toussaint, in correspondence with United States president John
Adams, pledged that in exchange for support he would deny the French the
use of Saint-Domingue as a base for operations in North America. Adams,
the leader of an independent, but still insecure, nation, found the
arrangement desirable and dispatched arms and ships that greatly aided
black forces in what is sometimes referred to as the War of the Castes.
Rigaud, with his forces and ambitions crushed, fled the colony in late
1800.
After securing the port of Santo Domingo in May 1800, Toussaint held
sway over the whole of Hispaniola. This position gave him an opportunity
to concentrate on restoring domestic order and productivity. Like
Jean-Jacques Dessalines and Henri (Henry) Christophe, Toussaint saw that
the survival of his homeland depended on an export-oriented economy. He
therefore reimposed the plantation system and utilized nonslaves, but he
still essentially relied on forced labor to produce the sugar, coffee,
and other commodities needed to support economic progress. He directed
this process through his military dictatorship, the form of government
that he judged most efficacious under the circumstances. A constitution,
approved in 1801 by the then still-extant Colonial Assembly, granted
Toussaint, as Governor-general-for-life, all effective power as well as
the privilege of choosing his successor.
Toussaint's interval of freedom from foreign confrontation was
unfortunately brief. Toussaint never severed the formal bond with
France, but his de facto independence and autonomy rankled the leaders
of the mother country and concerned the governments of slave-holding
nations, such as Britain and the United States. French first consul
Napol�on Bonaparte resented the temerity of the former slaves who
planned to govern a nation on their own. Moreover, Bonaparte regarded
Saint-Domingue as essential to potential French exploitation of the
Louisiana Territory. Taking advantage of a temporary halt in the wars in
Europe, Bonaparte dispatched to Saint-Domingue forces led by his
brother-in-law, General Charles Victor Emmanuel Leclerc. These forces,
numbering between 16,000 and 20,000--about the same size as Toussaint's
army--landed at several points on the north coast in January 1802. With
the help of white colonists and mulatto forces commanded by P�tion and
others, the French outmatched, outmaneuvered, and wore down the black
army. Two of Toussaint's chief lieutenants, Dessalines and Christophe,
recognized their untenable situation, held separate parleys with the
invaders, and agreed to transfer their allegiance. Recognizing his weak
position, Toussaint surrendered to Leclerc on May 5, 1802. The French
assured Toussaint that he would be allowed to retire quietly, but a
month later, they seized him and transported him to France, where he
died of neglect in the frigid dungeon of Fort de Joux in the Jura
Mountains on April 7, 1803.
The betrayal of Toussaint and Bonaparte's restoration of slavery in
Martinique undermined the collaboration of leaders such as Dessalines,
Christophe, and P�tion. Convinced that the same fate lay in store for
Saint-Domingue, these commanders and others once again battled Leclerc
and his disease-riddled army. Leclerc himself died of yellow fever in
November 1802, about two months after he had requested reinforcements to
quash the renewed resistance. Leclerc's replacement, General Donatien
Rochambeau, waged a bloody campaign against the insurgents, but events
beyond the shores of Saint-Domingue doomed the campaign to failure.
By 1803 war had resumed between France and Britain, and Bonaparte
once again concentrated his energies on the struggle in Europe. In April
of that year, Bonaparte signed a treaty that allowed the purchase of
Louisiana by the United States and ended French ambitions in the Western
Hemisphere. Rochambeau's reinforcements and supplies never arrived in
sufficient numbers. The general fled to Jamaica in November 1803, where
he surrendered to British authorities rather than face the retribution
of the rebel leadership. The era of French colonial rule in Haiti had
ended.
Haiti - INDEPENDENT HAITI
On January 1, 1804, Haiti proclaimed its independence. Through this
action, it became the second independent state in the Western Hemisphere
and the first free black republic in the world. Haiti's uniqueness
attracted much attention and symbolized the aspirations of enslaved and
exploited peoples around the globe. Nonetheless, Haitians made no overt
effort to inspire, to support, or to aid slave rebellions similar to
their own because they feared that the great powers would take renewed
action against them. For the sake of national survival, nonintervention
became a Haitian credo.
Dessalines, who had commanded the black and the mulatto forces during
the final phase of the revolution, became the new country's leader; he
ruled under the dictatorial 1801 constitution. The land he governed had
been devastated by years of warfare. The agricultural base was all but
destroyed, and the population was uneducated and largely unskilled.
Commerce was virtually nonexistent. Contemplating this bleak situation,
Dessalines determined, as Toussaint had done, that a firm hand was
needed.
White residents felt the sting most sharply. While Toussaint, a
former privileged slave of a tolerant white master, had felt a certain
magnanimity toward whites, Dessalines, a former field slave, despised
them with a maniacal intensity. He reportedly agreed wholeheartedly with
his aide, Boisrond-Tonnerre, who stated, "For our declaration of
independence, we should have the skin of a white man for parchment, his
skull for an inkwell, his blood for ink, and a bayonet for a pen!"
Accordingly, whites were slaughtered wholesale under the rule of
Dessalines.
Although blacks were not massacred under Dessalines, they witnessed
little improvement in the quality of their lives. To restore some
measure of agricultural productivity, Dessalines reestablished the
plantation system. Harsh measures bound laborers to their assigned work
places, and penalties were imposed on runaways and on those who harbored
them. Because Dessalines drew his only organizational experience from
war, it was natural for him to use the military as a tool for governing
the new nation. The rule of Dessalines set a pattern for direct
involvement of the army in politics that continued unchallenged for more
than 150 years.
In 1805 Dessalines crowned himself Emperor of Haiti. By this point,
his autocratic rule had disenchanted important sectors of Haitian
society, particularly mulattoes such as P�tion. The mulattoes resented
Dessalines mostly for racial reasons, but the more educated and cultured
gens de couleur also derided the emperor (and most of his aides
and officers) for his ignorance and illiteracy. Efforts by Dessalines to
bring mulatto families into the ruling group through marriage met with
resistance. P�tion himself declined the offer of the hand of the
emperor's daughter. Many mulattoes were appalled by the rampant
corruption and licentiousness of the emperor's court. Dessalines's
absorption of a considerable amount of land into the hands of the state
through the exploitation of irregularities in titling procedures also
aroused the ire of landowners.
The disaffection that sealed the emperor's fate arose within the
ranks of the army, where Dessalines had lost support at all levels. The
voracious appetites of his ruling clique apparently left little or
nothing in the treasury for military salaries and provisions. Although
reportedly aware of discontent among the ranks, Dessalines made no
effort to redress these shortcomings. Instead, he relied on the same
iron-fisted control with which he kept rural laborers in line. That his
judgement in this matter had been in error became apparent on the road
to Port-au-Prince as he rode with a column of troops on its way to crush
a mulattoled rebellion. A group of people, probably hired by P�tion or
Etienne-Elie G�rin (another mulatto officer), shot the emperor and
hacked his body to pieces.
Under Dessalines the Haitian economy had made little progress despite
the restoration of forced labor. Conflict between blacks and mulattoes
ended the cooperation that the revolution had produced, and the
brutality toward whites shocked foreign governments and isolated Haiti
internationally. A lasting enmity against Haiti arose among Dominicans
as a result of the emperor's unsuccessful invasion of Santo Domingo in
1805. Dessalines's failure to consolidate Haiti and to unite Haitians
had ramifications in the years that followed, as the nation split into
two rival enclaves.
Haiti - Christophe's Kingdom and P�tion's Republic
Many candidates succeeded Dessalines, but only three approached his
stature. Most Haitians saw Henry Christophe as the most logical choice.
He had served as a commander under Toussaint and could therefore claim
the former leader's mantle and some of his mystique. Christophe was
black like Dessalines, but he lacked Dessalines's consuming racial
hatred, and he was much more pragmatic in this regard. His popularity,
especially in the north, however, was not strong enough to offset the
mulatto elite's growing desire to exert control over Haiti through a
leader drawn from its own ranks. The mulattoes had two other candidates
in mind: G�rin and P�tion, the presumed authors of Dessalines's
assassination.
In November 1806, army officers and established anciens libres
(pre-independence freedmen) landowners--an electorate dominated by the
mulatto elite--elected a constituent assembly that was given the task of
establishing a new government. Members of the assembly drafted a
constitution that established a weak presidency and a comparatively
strong legislature. They selected Christophe as president and P�tion as
head of the legislature, the earliest attempt in Haiti to establish what
would later be known as the politique de doublure (politics by
understudies). Under this system, a black leader served as figurehead
for mulatto elitist rule.
The only defect in the mulattoes' scheme was Christophe himself, who
refused to be content with his figurehead role. He mustered his forces
and marched on Port-au-Prince. His assault on the city failed, however,
mainly because P�tion had artillery and Christophe did not. Indignant,
but not defeated, Christophe retreated to north of the Artibonite River
and established his own dominion, which he ruled from Cap Ha�tien
(which he would later rechristen Cap Henry). Periodic and ineffectual
clashes went on for years between this northern territory and P�tion's
republic, which encompassed most of the southern half of the country and
boasted Port-au-Prince as its capital.
The northern dominion became a kingdom in 1811, when Christophe
crowned himself King Henry I of Haiti. Unlike Dessalines, who as emperor
declared, "Only I am royal," Christophe installed a nobility
of mainly black supporters and associates who assumed the titles of
earls, counts, and barons.
Below this aristocratic level, life in the northern kingdom was
harsh, but not nearly so cruel as the conditions that had prevailed
under Dessalines. Laborers remained bound to their plantations, but
working hours were liberalized, and remuneration was increased to
one-fourth of the harvested crop.
Christophe was a great believer in discipline. He brought African
warriors from Dahomey (present-day Benin), whom he dubbed Royal
Dahomets. They served as the primary agents of his authority.
Incorruptible and intensely loyal to Christophe, the Dahomets brought
order to the countryside.
Many people were dissatisfied with the strictness of Christophe's
regime. As productivity and export levels rose, however, the quality of
their lives improved in comparison with revolutionary and immediately
post-revolutionary days.
In the more permissive southern republic, where P�tion ruled as
president-for-life, people's lives were not improving. The crucial
difference between the northern kingdom and the southern republic was
the way each treated landownership. Christophe gave ownership of the
bulk of the land to the state and leased large tracts to estate
managers. P�tion took the opposite approach and distributed state-owned
land to individuals in small parcels. P�tion began distributing land in
1809, when he granted land to his soldiers. Later on, P�tion extended
the land-grant plan to other beneficiaries and lowered the selling price
of state land to a level where almost anyone could afford to own land.
P�tion's decision proved detrimental in the shaping of modern Haiti. Smallholders had little
incentive to produce export crops instead of subsistence crops. Coffee,
because of its relative ease of cultivation, came to dominate
agriculture in the south. The level of coffee production, however, did
not permit any substantial exports. Sugar, which had been produced in
large quantities in Saint-Domingue, was no longer exported from Haiti
after 1822. When the cultivation of cane ceased, sugar mills closed, and
people lost their jobs. In the south, the average Haitian was an
isolated, poor, free, and relatively content yeoman. In the north, the
average Haitian was a resentful but comparatively prosperous laborer.
The desire for personal autonomy motivated most Haitians more than the
vaguer concept of contributing to a strong national economy, however,
and defections to the south were frequent, much to the consternation of
Christophe.
P�tion, who died in 1818, left a lasting imprint upon his homeland.
He ruled under two constitutions, which were promulgated in 1806 and
1816. The 1806 document resembled in many ways the Constitution of the
United States. The 1816 charter, however, replaced the elected
presidency with the office of president for life.
P�tion's largely laissez-faire rule did not directly discriminate
against blacks, but it did promote an entrenched mulatto elite that
benefited from such policies as the restoration of land confiscated by
Dessalines and cash reimbursement for crops lost during the last year of
the emperor's rule. Despite the egalitarianism of land distribution,
government and politics in the republic remained the province of the
elite, especially because the control of commerce came to replace the
production of commodities as the focus of economic power in Haiti. P�tion
was a beneficent ruler, and he was beloved by the people, who referred
to him as "Papa Bon Coeur" (Father Good Heart). But P�tion
was neither a true statesman nor a visionary. Some have said that his
impact on the nations of South America, through his support for rebels
such as Sim�n Bol�var Palacios and Francisco de Miranda, was stronger
and more positive than his impact on his own impoverished country.
Although Christophe sought a reconciliation after P�tion's death,
the southern elite rejected the notion of submission to a black leader.
Because the president-for-life had died without naming a successor, the
republican senate selected P�tion's mulatto secretary and commander of
the Presidential Guard (Garde Pr�sidentielle), General Jean-Pierre
Boyer, to fill the post. In the north, King Henry committed suicide in
October 1820, after having suffered a severe stroke that caused him to
lose control of the army, his main source of power. The kingdom, which
had been ruled by an even narrower clique than the republic, was left
ripe for the taking. Boyer claimed it on October 26 at Cap Ha�tien at
the head of 20,000 troops. Haiti was once again a single nation.
Haiti - Boyer: Expansion and Decline
Boyer shared P�tion's conciliatory approach to governance, but he
lacked his stature as a leader. The length of Boyer's rule (1818-43)
reflected his political acumen, but he accomplished little. Boyer took
advantage of internecine conflict in Santo Domingo by invading and
securing the Spanish part of Hispaniola in 1822. He succeeded where
Toussaint and Dessalines had failed. Occupation of the territory,
however, proved unproductive for the Haitians, and ultimately it sparked
a Dominican rebellion.
Boyer faced drastically diminished productivity as a result of P�tion's
economic policies. Most Haitians had fallen into comfortable isolation
on their small plots of land, content to eke out a quiet living after
years of turmoil and duress. Boyer enacted a Rural Code (Code Rural),
designed to force yeomen into large-scale production of export crops.
The nation, however, lacked the wherewithal, the enthusiasm, and the
discipline to enforce the code.
Boyer perceived that France's continued refusal to settle claims
remaining from the revolution and to recognize its former colony's
independence constituted the gravest threat to Haitian integrity. His
solution to the problem--payment in return for recognition--secured
Haiti from French aggression, but it emptied the treasury and mortgaged
the country's future to French banks, which eagerly provided the balance
of the hefty first installment. The indemnity was later reduced in 1838
from 150 million francs to 60 million francs. By that time, however, the
damage to Haiti had been done.
As the Haitian economy stagnated under Boyer, Haitian society
ossified. The lines separating mulattoes and blacks sharpened, despite
Boyer's efforts to appoint blacks to responsible positions in
government. The overwhelming rate of illiteracy among even well-to-do
blacks foiled Boyer's intentions. Still, his government effected no
substantial improvements in the limited educational system that P�tion
had established. The exclusivity of the social structure thus
perpetuated itself. Many blacks found no avenues in the bureaucracy for
social mobility, and they turned to careers in the military, where
literacy was not a requirement.
As P�tion's successor, Boyer held the title of president-for- life.
The length and relative placidity of his rule represented a period of
respite for most Haitians after the violence and disorder that had
characterized the emergence of their nation. Pressures gradually built
up, however, as various groups, especially young mulattoes, began to
chafe at the seemingly deliberate maintenance of the political and
social status quo.
In the late 1830s, legislative opposition to Boyer clustered around H�rard
Dumesle, a mulatto poet and liberal political thinker. Dumesle and his
followers decried the anemic state of the nation's economy and its
concomitant dependence on imported goods. They also disdained the
continued elite adherence to French culture and urged Haitians to forge
their own national identity. Their grievances against Boyer's government
included corruption, nepotism, suppression of free expression, and rule
by executive fiat. Banding together in a fraternity, they christened
their organization the Society for the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.
The group of young mulattoes called for an end to Boyer's rule and for
the establishment of a provisional government.
The government expelled Dumesle and his followers from the
legislature and made no effort to address their grievances. The
perceived intransigence of the Boyer government triggered violent
clashes in the south near Les Cayes. Forces under the command of Charles
Rivi�re-H�rard, a cousin of Dumesle, swept through the southern
peninsula toward the capital. Boyer received word on February 11, 1843,
that most of his army units had joined the rebels. A victim of what was
later known as the Revolution of 1843, Boyer sailed to Jamaica. Rivi�re-H�rard
replaced him in the established tradition of military rule.
Haiti - DECADES OF INSTABILITY, 1843-1915
Leyburn summarizes this chaotic era in Haitian history. "Of the
twenty-two heads of state between 1843 and 1915, only one served out his
prescribed term of office, three died while serving, one was blown up
with his palace, one presumably poisoned, one hacked to pieces by a mob,
one resigned. The other fourteen were deposed by revolution after
incumbencies ranging in length from three months to twelve years."
During this wide gulf between the 1843 revolution and occupation by the
United States in 1915, Haiti's leadership became the most valuable prize
in an unprincipled competition among strongmen. The overthrow of a
government usually degenerated into a business venture, with foreign
merchants--frequently Germans--initially funding a rebellion in the
expectation of a substantial return after its success. The weakness of
Haitian governments of the period and the potential profits to be gained
from supporting a corrupt leader made such investments attractive.
Rivi�re-H�rard enjoyed only a brief tenure as president. It was
restive and rebellious Dominicans, rather than Haitians, who struck one
of the more telling blows against this leader. Nationalist forces led by
Juan Pablo Duarte seized control of Santo Domingo on February 27, 1844.
Unprofessional and undisciplined Haitian forces in the east, unprepared
for a significant uprising, capitulated to the rebels. In March Rivi�re-H�rard
attempted to reimpose his authority, but the Dominicans put up stiff
opposition. Soon after Rivi�re-H�rard crossed the border, domestic
turmoil exploded again.
Discontent among black rural cultivators, which had flared up
periodically under Boyer, re-emerged in 1844 and led to greater change.
Bands of ragged piquets (a term derived from the word for the
pikes they brandished), under the leadership of a black, former army
officer named Louis Jean-Jacques Acaau, rampaged through the south. The piquets
who were capable of articulating a political position demanded an end to
mulatto rule and the election of a black president. Their demands were
eventually met but not by the defeated Rivi�re-H�rard, who returned
home to a country where he enjoyed little support and wielded no
effective power. In May 1844, his ouster by several rebel groups brought
to power Philippe Guerrier, an aged black officer who had been a member
of the peerage under Christophe's kingdom.
Guerrier's installation by a mulatto-dominated establishment
represented the formal beginning of politique de doublure; a
succession of short-lived black leaders was chosen after Guerrier in an
effort to appease the piquets and to avoid renewed unrest in
the countryside. During this period, two exceptions to the pattern of
abbreviated rule were Faustin Soulouque (1847-59) and Fabre Nicolas
Geffrard (1859-67). Soulouque, a black general of no particular
distinction, was considered just another understudy when he was tapped
by the legislature as a compromise between competing factions. Once in
office, however, he displayed a Machiavellian taste for power. He purged
the military high command, established a secret police force--known as
the zinglins--to keep dissenters in line, and eliminated
mulatto opponents. In August 1849, he grandiosely proclaimed himself as
Haiti's second emperor, Faustin I.
Soulouque, like Boyer, enjoyed a comparatively long period of power
that yielded little of value to his country. Whereas Boyer's rule had
been marked by torpor and neglect, Soulouque's was distinguished by
violence, repression, and rampant corruption. Soulouque's expansive
ambitions led him to mount several invasions of the Dominican Republic.
The Dominicans turned back his first foray in 1849 before he reached
Santo Domingo. Another invasion in 1850 proved even less successful.
Failed campaigns in 1855 and in 1856 fueled mounting discontent among
the military; a revolt led by Geffrard, who had led a contingent in the
Dominican campaign, forced the emperor out of power in 1859.
Geffrard, a dark-skinned mulatto, restored the old order of elite
rule. After the turmoil of Soulouque's regime, Geffrard's rule seemed
comparatively tranquil and even somewhat progressive. Geffrard produced
a new constitution based largely on P�tion's 1816 document, improved
transportation, and expanded education (although the system still
favored the upper classes). Geffrard also signed a concordat with the
Vatican in 1860 that expanded the presence of the Roman Catholic Church
and its preponderantly foreign-born clergy in Haiti, particularly
through the establishment of parochial schools. The move ended a period of ill will between Haiti and
the church that had begun during the revolutionary period.
Intrigue and discontent among the elite and the piquets
beset Geffrard throughout his rule. In 1867 General Sylvain Salnave--a
light-skinned mulatto who received considerable support from blacks in
the north and in the capital- -forced Geffrard from office. The
overthrow profoundly unsettled the country, and Salnave's end came
quickly. Rural rebellion among anti-Salnavist peasants who called
themselves cacos (a term of unknown derivation) triggered
renewed unrest among the piquets in the south. After several
military successes, Salnave's forces weakened, and the leader fled
Port-au-Prince. Caco forces captured him, however, near the
Dominican border, where they tried and executed him on January 15, 1870.
Successive leaders claimed control of most of the country and then
regularly confirmed their rule ex post facto through a vote by the
legislature, but none succeeded in establishing effective authority over
the entire country.
Rebellion, intrigue, and conspiracy continued to be commonplace even
under the rule of Louis Lysius F�licit� Salomon (1879-88), of the
National Party (Parti National--PN), the most notable and effective
president of the late nineteenth century. During one seven-year term and
the beginning of a second, Salomon revived agriculture to a limited
degree, attracted some foreign capital, established a national bank,
linked Haiti to the outside world through the telegraph, and made minor
improvements in the education system. Salomon, the scion of a prominent
black family, had spent many years in France after being expelled by
Rivi�re- H�rard. Salomon's support among the rural masses, along with
his energetic efforts to contain elite-instigated plots, kept him in
power longer than the strongmen who preceded and followed him. Still,
Salomon yielded--after years of conflict with forces led by the Liberal
Party (Parti Liberal--LP), and other disgruntled, power-hungry elite
elements.
Political forces during the late nineteenth century polarized around
the Liberal and the National parties. Mulattoes dominated the Liberal
ranks, while blacks dominated the National Party; both parties were
nonideological in nature. The parties competed on the battlefield, in
the legislature, within the ranks of the military, and in the more
refined but limited circles of the literati. The more populist
Nationalists marched under the banner of their party slogan, "the
greatest good for the greatest number," while the blatantly elitist
Liberals proclaimed their preference for "government by the most
competent."
Haitian politics remained unstable. From the fall of Salomon until
occupation by the United States in 1915, eleven men held the title of
president. Their tenures in office ranged from six and one-half years in
the case of Florvil Hyppolite (1889-96) to only months--especially
between 1912 and 1915, the turbulent period that preceded the United
States occupation--in the case of seven others.
Although domestic unrest helped pave the way for intervention by the
United States, geostrategic concerns also influenced events. The United
States had periodically entertained the notion of annexing Hispaniola,
but the divisive issue of slavery deterred the nation from acting. Until
1862 the United States refused to recognize Haiti's independence because
the free, black, island nation symbolized opposition to slavery.
President Ulysses S. Grant proposed annexation of the Dominican Republic
in 1870, but the United States Senate rejected the idea. By the late
nineteenth century, the growth of United States power and the prospect
of a transoceanic canal in either Nicaragua or Panama had increased
attention given to the Caribbean. Annexation faded as a policy option,
but Washington persistently pursued efforts to secure naval stations
throughout the region. The United States favored the M�le Saint-Nicolas
as an outpost, but Haiti refused to cede territory to a foreign power.
The French and the British still claimed interests in Haiti, but it
was the Germans' activity on the island that concerned the United States
most. The small German community in Haiti (approximately 200 in 1910)
wielded a disproportionate amount of economic power. Germans controlled
about 80 percent of the country's international commerce; they also
owned and operated utilities in Cap Ha�tien and Port-au-Prince, the
main wharf and a tramway in the capital, and a railroad in the north.
The Germans, as did the French, aiming to collect the nation's customs
receipts to cover Haiti's outstanding debts to European creditors, also
sought control of the nearly insolvent National Bank of Haiti. This kind
of arrangement was known technically as a customs receivership.
Officials in Washington were especially concerned about Germany's
aggressive employment of military might. In December 1897, a German
commodore in charge of two warships demanded and received an indemnity
from the Haitian government for a German national who had been deported
from the island after a legal dispute. Another German warship intervened
in a Haitian uprising in September 1902. It forced the captain of a
rebel gunboat (that had waylaid a German merchant ship) to resort to
blowing up his ship--and himself--to avoid being seized.
Reports reached Washington that Berlin was considering setting up a
coaling station at the M�le Saint-Nicolas to serve the German naval
fleet. This potential strategic encroachment resonated through the White
House, at a time when the Monroe Doctrine (a policy that opposed
European intervention in the Western Hemisphere) and the Roosevelt
Corollary (whereby the United States assumed the responsibility for
direct intervention in Latin American nations in order to check the
influence of European powers) strongly shaped United States foreign
policy, and when war on a previously unknown scale had broken out in
Europe. The administration of President Woodrow Wilson accordingly began
contingency planning for an occupation of Haiti.
Escalating instability in Haiti all but invited foreign intervention.
The country's most productive president of the early twentieth century,
Cincinnatus Leconte, had died in a freak explosion in the National
Palace (Palais National) in August 1912. Five more contenders claimed
the country's leadership over the next three years. General Vilbrun
Guillaume Sam, who had helped to bring Leconte to power, took the oath
of office in March 1915. Like every other Haitian president of the
period, he faced active rebellion to his rule. His leading opponent,
Rosalvo Bobo, reputedly hostile toward the United States, represented to
Washington a barrier to expanded commercial and strategic ties. A
pretext for intervention came on July 27, 1915, when Guillaume Sam
executed 167 political prisoners. Popular outrage provoked mob violence
in the streets of Port-au-Prince. A throng of incensed citizens sought
out Guillaume Sam at his sanctuary in the French embassy and literally
tore him to pieces. The spectacle of an exultant rabble parading through
the streets of the capital bearing the dismembered corpse of their
former president shocked decision makers in the United States and
spurred them to swift action. The first sailors and marines landed in
Port-au-Prince on July 28. Within six weeks, representatives from the
United States controlled Haitian customs houses and administrative
institutions. For the next nineteen years, Haiti's powerful neighbor to
the north guided and governed the country.
Haiti - THE UNITED STATES OCCUPATION, 1915-34
Representatives from the United States wielded veto power over all
governmental decisions in Haiti, and Marine Corps commanders served as
administrators in the provinces. Local institutions, however, continued
to be run by Haitians, as was required under policies put in place
during the presidency of Woodrow Wilson. In line with these policies,
Admiral William Caperton, the initial commander of United States forces,
instructed Bobo to refrain from offering himself to the legislature as a
presidential candidate. Philippe Sudre Dartiguenave, the mulatto
president of the Senate, agreed to accept the presidency of Haiti after
several other candidates had refused on principle.
With a figurehead installed in the National Palace and other
institutions maintained in form if not in function, Caperton declared
martial law, a condition that persisted until 1929. A treaty passed by
the Haitian legislature in November 1915 granted further authority to
the United States. The treaty allowed Washington to assume complete
control of Haiti's finances, and it gave the United States sole
authority over the appointment of advisers and receivers. The treaty
also gave the United States responsibility for establishing and running
public-health and public-works programs and for supervising routine
governmental affairs. The treaty also established the Gendarmerie d'Ha�ti
(Haitian Constabulary), a step later replicated in the Dominican
Republic and Nicaragua. The Gendarmerie was Haiti's first professional
military force, and it was eventually to play an important political
role in the country. In 1917 President Dartiguenave dissolved the
legislature after its members refused to approve a constitution
purportedly authored by United States assistant secretary of the navy
Franklin D. Roosevelt. A referendum subsequently approved the new
constitution (by a vote of 98,225 to 768), however, in 1918. Generally a
liberal document, the constitution allowed foreigners to purchase land.
Dessalines had forbidden land ownership by foreigners, and since 1804
most Haitians had viewed foreign ownership as anathema.
The occupation by the United States had several effects on Haiti. An
early period of unrest culminated in a 1918 rebellion by up to 40,000
former cacos and other disgruntled people. The scale of the
uprising overwhelmed the Gendarmerie, but marine reinforcements helped
put down the revolt at the estimated cost of 2,000 Haitian lives.
Thereafter, order prevailed to a degree that most Haitians had never
witnessed. The order, however, was imposed largely by white foreigners
with deep-seated racial prejudices and a disdain for the notion of
self-determination by inhabitants of less-developed nations. These
attitudes particularly dismayed the mulatto elite, who had heretofore
believed in their innate superiority over the black masses. The whites
from North America, however, did not distinguish among Haitians,
regardless of their skin tone, level of education, or sophistication.
This intolerance caused indignation, resentment, and eventually a racial
pride that was reflected in the work of a new generation of Haitian
historians, ethnologists, writers, artists, and others, many of whom
later became active in politics and government. Still, as Haitians
united in their reaction to the racism of the occupying forces, the
mulatto elite managed to dominate the country's bureaucracy and to
strengthen its role in national affairs.
The occupation had several positive aspects. It greatly improved
Haiti's infrastructure. Roads were improved and expanded. Almost all
roads, however, led to Port-au-Prince, resulting in a gradual
concentration of economic activity in the capital. Bridges went up
throughout the country; a telephone system began to function; several
towns gained access to clean water; and a construction boom (in some
cases employing forced labor) helped restore wharves, lighthouses,
schools, and hospitals. Public health improved, partially because of
United States-directed campaigns against malaria and yaws (a crippling
disease caused by a spirochete). Sound fiscal management kept Haiti
current on its foreign-debt payments at a time when default among Latin
American nations was common. By that time, United States banks were
Haiti's main creditors, an important incentive for Haiti to make timely
payments.
In 1922 Louis Borno replaced Dartiguenave, who was forced out of
office for temporizing over the approval of a debtconsolidation loan.
Borno ruled without the benefit of a legislature (dissolved in 1917
under Dartiguenave) until elections were again permitted in 1930. The
legislature, after several ballots, elected mulatto St�nio Vincent to
the presidency.
The occupation of Haiti continued after World War I, despite the
embarrassment that it caused Woodrow Wilson at the Paris peace
conference in 1919 and the scrutiny of a congressional inquiry in 1922.
By 1930 President Herbert Hoover had become concerned about the effects
of the occupation, particularly after a December 1929 incident in Les
Cayes in which marines killed at least ten Haitian peasants during a
march to protest local economic conditions. Hoover appointed two
commissions to study the situation. A former governor general of the
Philippines, W. Cameron Forbes, headed the more prominent of the two.
The Forbes Commission praised the material improvements that the United
States administration had wrought, but it criticized the exclusion of
Haitians from positions of real authority in the government and the
constabulary, which had come to be known as the Garde d'Ha�ti. In more
general terms, the commission further asserted that "the social
forces that created [instability] still remain--poverty, ignorance, and
the lack of a tradition or desire for orderly free government."
The Hoover administration did not implement fully the recommendations
of the Forbes Commission, but United States withdrawal was well under
way by 1932, when Hoover lost the presidency to Roosevelt, the presumed
author of the most recent Haitian constitution. On a visit to Cap Ha�tien
in July 1934, Roosevelt reaffirmed an August 1933 disengagement
agreement. The last contingent of marines departed in mid-August, after
a formal transfer of authority to the Garde. As in other countries
occupied by the United States in the early twentieth century, the local
military was often the only cohesive and effective institution left in
the wake of withdrawal.
Haiti - POLITICS AND THE MILITARY, 1934-57
The Garde was a new kind of military institution in Haiti. It was a force manned
overwhelmingly by blacks, with a United States- trained black commander,
Colonel D�mosth�nes P�trus Calixte. Most of the Garde's officers,
however, were mulattoes. The Garde was a national organization; it
departed from the regionalism that had characterized most of Haiti's
previous armies. In theory, its charge was apolitical--to maintain
internal order, while supporting a popularly elected government. The
Garde initially adhered to this role.
President Vincent took advantage of the comparative national
stability, which was being maintained by a professionalized military, to
gain absolute power. A plebiscite permitted the transfer of all
authority in economic matters from the legislature to the executive, but
Vincent was not content with this expansion of his power. In 1935 he
forced through the legislature a new constitution, which was also
approved by plebiscite. The constitution praised Vincent, and it granted
the executive sweeping powers to dissolve the legislature at will, to
reorganize the judiciary, to appoint ten of twenty-one senators (and to
recommend the remaining eleven to the lower house), and to rule by
decree when the legislature was not in session. Although Vincent
implemented some improvements in infrastructure and services, he
brutally repressed his opposition, censored the press, and governed
largely to benefit himself and a clique of merchants and corrupt
military officers.
Under Calixte the majority of Garde personnel had adhered to the
doctrine of political nonintervention that their Marine Corps trainers
had stressed. Over time, however, Vincent and Dominican dictator Rafael
Le�nidas Trujillo Molina sought to buy adherents among the ranks.
Trujillo, determined to expand his influence over all of Hispaniola, in
October 1937 ordered the indiscriminate butchery by the Dominican army
of an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 Haitians on the Dominican side of the
Massacre River. Some observers claim that Trujillo
supported an abortive coup attempt by young Garde officers in December
1937. Vincent dismissed Calixte as commander and sent him abroad, where
he eventually accepted a commission in the Dominican military as a
reward for his efforts while on Trujillo's payroll. The attempted coup
led Vincent to purge the officer corps of all members suspected of
disloyalty, marking the end of the apolitical military.
In 1941 Vincent showed every intention of standing for a third term
as president, but after almost a decade of disengagement, the United
States made it known that it would oppose such an extension. Vincent
accommodated the Roosevelt administration and handed power over to Elie
Lescot.
Lescot was a mulatto who had served in numerous government posts. He
was competent and forceful, and many considered him a sterling candidate
for the presidency, despite his elitist background. Like the majority of
previous Haitian presidents, however, he failed to live up to his
potential. His tenure paralleled that of Vincent in many ways. Lescot
declared himself commander in chief of the military, and power resided
in a clique that ruled with the tacit support of the Garde. He repressed
his opponents, censored the press, and compelled the legislature to
grant him extensive powers. He handled all budget matters without
legislative sanction and filled legislative vacancies without calling
elections. Lescot commonly said that Haiti's declared state-of-war
against the Axis powers during World War II justified his repressive
actions. Haiti, however, played no role in the war except for supplying
the United States with raw materials and serving as a base for a United
States Coast Guard detachment.
Aside from his authoritarian tendencies, Lescot had another flaw: his
relationship with Trujillo. While serving as Haitian ambassador to the
Dominican Republic, Lescot fell under the sway of Trujillo's influence
and wealth. In fact, it was Trujillo's money that reportedly bought most
of the legislative votes that brought Lescot to power. Their clandestine
association persisted until 1943, when the two leaders parted ways for
unknown reasons. Trujillo later made public all his correspondence with
the Haitian leader. The move undermined Lescot's already dubious popular
support.
In January 1946, events came to a head when Lescot jailed the Marxist
editors of a journal called La Ruche (The Beehive). This action
precipitated student strikes and protests by government workers,
teachers, and shopkeepers in the capital and provincial cities. In
addition, Lescot's mulatto-dominated rule had alienated the
predominantly black Garde. His position became untenable, and he
resigned on January 11. Radio announcements declared that the Garde had
assumed power, which it would administer through a three-member junta.
The Revolution of 1946 was a novel development in Haiti's history,
insofar as the Garde assumed power as an institution, not as the
instrument of a particular commander. The members of the junta, known as
the Military Executive Committee (Comit� Ex�cutif Militaire), were
Garde commander Colonel Franck Lavaud, Major Antoine Levelt, and Major
Paul E. Magloire, commander of the Presidential Guard. All three
understood Haiti's traditional way of exercising power, but they lacked
a thorough understanding of what would be required to make the
transition to an elected civilian government. Upon taking power, the
junta pledged to hold free elections. The junta also explored other
options, but public clamor, which included public demonstrations in
support of potential candidates, eventually forced the officers to make
good on their promise.
Haiti elected its National Assembly in May 1946. The Assembly set
August 16, 1946, as the date on which it would select a president. The
leading candidates for the office--all of whom were black--were
Dumarsais Estim�, a former school teacher, assembly member, and cabinet
minister under Vincent; F�lix d'Orl�ans Juste Constant, leader of the
Haitian Communist Party (Parti Communiste d'Ha�ti--PCH); and former
Garde commander Calixte, who stood as the candidate of a progressive
coalition that included the Worker Peasant Movement (Mouvement Ouvrier
Paysan--MOP). MOP chose to endorse Calixte, instead of a candidate from
its own ranks, because the party's leader, Daniel Fignol�, was only
twenty-six years old--too young to stand for the nation's highest
office. Estim�, politically the most moderate of the three, drew
support from the black population in the north, as well as from the
emerging black middle class. The leaders of the military, who would not
countenance the election of Juste Constant and who reacted warily to the
populist Fignol�, also considered Estim� the safest candidate. After
two rounds of polling, legislators gave Estim� the presidency.
Estim�'s election represented a break with Haiti's political
tradition. Although he was reputed to have received support from
commanders of the Garde, Estim� was a civilian. Of humble origins, he
was passionately anti-elitist and therefore generally antimulatto. He
demonstrated, at least initially, a genuine concern for the welfare of
the people. Operating under a new constitution that went into effect in
November 1946, Estim� proposed, but never secured passage of, Haiti's
first social- security legislation. He did, however, expand the school
system, encourage the establishment of rural cooperatives, raise the
salaries of civil servants, and increase the representation of
middle-class and lower-class blacks in the public sector. He also
attempted to gain the favor of the Garde--renamed the Haitian Army (Arm�e
d'Ha�ti) in March 1947--by promoting Lavaud to brigadier general and by
seeking United States military assistance.
Estim� eventually fell victim to two of the time-honored pitfalls of
Haitian rule: elite intrigue and personal ambition. The elite had a
number of grievances against Estim�. Not only had he largely excluded
them from the often lucrative levers of government, but he also enacted
the country's first income tax, fostered the growth of labor unions, and
suggested that voodoo be considered as a religion equivalent to Roman
Catholicism--a notion that the Europeanized elite abhorred. Lacking
direct influence in Haitian affairs, the elite resorted to clandestine
lobbying among the officer corps. Their efforts, in combination with
deteriorating domestic conditions, led to a coup in May 1950.
To be sure, Estim� had hastened his own demise in several ways. His
nationalization of the Standard Fruit banana concession sharply reduced
the firm's revenues. He alienated workers by requiring them to invest
between 10 percent and 15 percent of their salaries in national-defense
bonds. The president sealed his fate by attempting to manipulate the
constitution in order to extend his term in office. Seizing on this
action and the popular unrest it engendered, the army forced the
president to resign on May 10, 1950. The same junta that had assumed
power after the fall of Lescot reinstalled itself. An army escort
conducted Estim� from the National Palace and into exile in Jamaica.
The events of May 1946 made an impression upon the deposed minister of
labor, Fran�ois Duvalier. The lesson that Duvalier drew from Estim�'s
ouster was that the military could not be trusted. It was a lesson that
he would act upon when he gained power.
The power balance within the junta shifted between 1946 and 1950.
Lavaud was the preeminent member at the time of the first coup, but
Magloire, now a colonel, dominated after Estim�'s overthrow. When Haiti
announced that its first direct elections (all men twenty-one or over
were allowed to vote) would be held on October 8, 1950, Magloire
resigned from the junta and declared himself a candidate for president.
In contrast to the chaotic political climate of 1946, the campaign of
1950 proceeded under the implicit understanding that only a strong
candidate backed by both the army and the elite would be able to take
power. Facing only token opposition, Magloire won the election and
assumed office on December 6.
Magloire restored the elite to prominence. The business community and
the government benefited from favorable economic conditions until
Hurricane Hazel hit the island in 1954. Haiti made some improvements on
its infrastructure, but most of these were financed largely by foreign
loans. By Haitian standards, Magloire's rule was firm, but not harsh: he
jailed political opponents, including Fignol�, and shut down their
presses when their protests grew too strident, but he allowed labor
unions to function, although they were not permitted to strike. It was
in the arena of corruption, however, that Magloire overstepped
traditional bounds. The president controlled the sisal, cement, and soap
monopolies. He and other officials built imposing mansions. The
injection of international hurricane relief funds into an already
corrupt system boosted graft to levels that disillusioned all Haitians.
To make matters worse, Magloire followed in the footsteps of many
previous presidents by disputing the termination date of his stay in
office. Politicians, labor leaders, and their followers flocked to the
streets in May 1956 to protest Magloire's failure to step down. Although
Magloire declared martial law, a general strike essentially shut down
Port-au-Prince. Again like many before him, Magloire fled to Jamaica,
leaving the army with the task of restoring order.
The period between the fall of Magloire and the election of Duvalier
in September 1957 was a chaotic one, even by Haitian standards. Three
provisional presidents held office during this interval; one resigned
and the army deposed the other two, Franck Sylvain and Fignol�.
Duvalier is said to have engaged actively in the behind-the-scenes
intrigue that helped him to emerge as the presidential candidate that
the military favored. The military went on to guide the campaign and the
elections in a way that gave Duvalier every possible advantage. Most
political actors perceived Duvalier--a medical doctor who had served as
a rural administrator of a United States-funded anti-yaws campaign
before entering the cabinet under Estim�--as an honest and fairly
unassuming leader without a strong ideological motivation or program.
When elections were finally organized, this time under terms of
universal suffrage (both men and women now had the vote), Duvalier, a
black, painted himself as the legitimate heir to Estim�. This approach
was enhanced by the fact that Duvalier's only viable opponent, Louis D�joie,
was a mulatto and the scion of a prominent family. Duvalier scored a
decisive victory at the polls. His followers took two-thirds of the
legislature's lower house and all of the seats in the Senate.
Haiti - FRAN�OIS DUVALIER, 1957-71
Like many Haitian leaders, Duvalier produced a constitution to
solidify his power. In 1961 he proceeded to violate the provisions of
that constitution, which had gone into effect in 1957. He replaced the
bicameral legislature with a unicameral body and decreed presidential
and legislative elections. Despite a 1957 prohibition against
presidential reelection, Duvalier ran for office and won with an
official tally of 1,320,748 votes to zero. Not content with this sham
display of democracy, he went on in 1964 to declare himself president
for life. For Duvalier, the move was a matter of political tradition;
seven heads of state before him had claimed the same title.
An ill-conceived coup attempt in July 1958 spurred Duvalier to act on
his conviction that Haiti's independent military threatened the security
of his presidency. In December the president sacked the armed forces
chief of staff and replaced him with a more reliable officer. This
action helped him to expand a Presidential Palace army unit into the
Presidential Guard. The Guard became the elite corps of the Haitian
army, and its sole purpose was to maintain Duvalier's power. After
having established his own power base within the military, Duvalier
dismissed the entire general staff and replaced aging Marinetrained
officers with younger men who owed their positions, and presumably their
loyalty, to Duvalier.
Duvalier also blunted the power of the army through a rural militia
formally named the Volunteers for National Security (Volontaires de la S�curit�
Nationale--VSN), but more commonly referred to as the tonton makouts
(derived from the Creole term for a mythological bogeyman). In 1961,
only two years afterDuvalier had established the group, the tonton
makouts had more than twice the power of the army. Over time, the
group gained even more power. While the Presidential Guard secured
Duvalier against his enemies in the capital, the tonton makouts
expanded his authority into rural areas. The tonton makouts
never became a true militia, but they were more than a mere secret
police force. The group's pervasive influence throughout the countryside
bolstered recruitment, mobilization, and patronage for the regime.
After Duvalier had displaced the established military with his own
security force, he employed corruption and intimidation to create his
own elite. Corruption--in the form of government rake-offs of
industries, bribery, extortion of domestic businesses, and stolen
government funds--enriched the dictator's closest supporters. Most of
these supporters held sufficient power to enable them to intimidate the
members of the old elite who were gradually co-opted or eliminated (the
luckier ones were allowed to emigrate).
Duvalier was an astute observer of Haitian life and a student of his
country's history. Although he had been reared in Port-au- Prince, his
medical experiences in the provinces had acquainted him with the
everyday concerns of the people, their predisposition toward
paternalistic authority (his patients referred to him as "Papa
Doc," a sobriquet that he relished and often applied to himself),
the ease with which their allegiance could be bought, and the central
role of voodoo in their lives. Duvalier exploited all of these points,
especially voodoo. He studied voodoo practices and beliefs and was
rumored to be a houngan. He related effectively to houngan
and bok� (voodoo sorcerers) throughout the country and
incorporated many of them into his intelligence network and the ranks of
the tonton makouts. His public recognition of voodoo and its
practitioners and his private adherence to voodoo ritual, combined with
his reputed practice of magic and sorcery, enhanced his popular persona
among the common people (who hesitated to trifle with a leader who had
such dark forces at his command) and served as a peculiar form of
legitimization of his rapacious and ignoble rule.
Duvalier weathered a series of foreign-policy crises early in his
tenure that ultimately enhanced his power and contributed to his
megalomaniacal conviction that he was, in his words, the
"personification of the Haitian fatherland." Duvalier's
repressive and authoritarian rule seriously disturbed United States
president John F. Kennedy. The Kennedy administration registered
particular concern over allegations that Duvalier had blatantly
misappropriated aid money and that he intended to employ a Marine Corps
mission to Haiti not to train the regular army but to strengthen the tonton
makouts. Washington acted on these charges and suspended aid in
mid-1962. Duvalier refused to accept United States demands for strict
accounting procedures as a precondition of aid renewal. Duvalier,
claiming to be motivated by nationalism, renounced all aid from
Washington. At that time, aid from the United States constituted a
substantial portion of the Haitian national budget. The move had little
direct impact on the Haitian people because most of the aid had been
siphoned off by Duvalierist cronies anyway. Renouncing the aid, however,
allowed the incipient dictator to portray himself as a principled and
lonely opponent of domination by a great power. Duvalier continued to
receive multilateral contributions. After Kennedy's death in November
1963, pressure on Duvalier eased, and the United States adopted a policy
of grudging acceptance of the Haitian regime because of the country's
strategic location near communist Cuba.
A more tense and confrontational situation developed in April 1963
between Duvalier and Dominican Republic president Juan Bosch Gavi�o.
Duvalier and Bosch were confirmed adversaries; the Dominican president
provided asylum and direct support to Haitian exiles who plotted against
the Duvalier regime. Duvalier ordered the Presidential Guard to occupy
the Dominican chancery in P�tionville in an effort to apprehend an army
officer believed to have been involved in an unsuccessful attempt to
kidnap the dictator's son, Jean-Claude Duvalier, and daughter, Simone
Duvalier. The Dominican Republic reacted with outrage and indignation.
Bosch publicly threatened to invade Haiti, and he ordered army units to
the frontier. Although observers throughout the world anticipated
military action that would lead to Duvalier's downfall, they saw events
turn in the Haitian tyrant's favor. Dominican military commanders, who
found Bosch's political leanings too far to the left, expressed little
support for an invasion of Haiti. Bosch, because he could not count on
his military, decided to let go of his dream to overthrow the
neighboring dictatorship. Instead, he allowed the matter to be settled
by emissaries of the Organization of American States (OAS).
Resistant to both domestic and foreign challenges, Duvalier
entrenched his rule through terror (an estimated 30,000 Haitians were
killed for political reasons during his tenure), emigration (which
removed the more activist elements of the population along with
thousands of purely economic migrants), and limited patronage. At the
time of his death in 1971, Fran�ois Duvalier designated his son,
Jean-Claude Duvalier, as Haiti's new leader. To the Haitian elite, who
still dominated the economy, the continuation of Duvalierism without
"Papa Doc" offered financial gain and a possibility for
recapturing some of the political influence lost under the dictatorship.
Haiti - JEAN-CLAUDE DUVALIER, 1971-86
The first few years after Jean-Claude Duvalier's installation as
Haiti's ninth president-for-life were a largely uneventful extension of
his father's rule. Jean-Claude was a feckless, dissolute
nineteen-year-old, who had been raised in an extremely isolated
environment and who had never expressed any interest in politics or
Haitian affairs. He initially resented the dynastic arrangement that had
made him Haiti's leader, and he was content to leave substantive and
administrative matters in the hands of his mother, Simone Ovid Duvalier,
while he attended ceremonial functions and lived as a playboy.
By neglecting his role in government, Jean-Claude squandered a
considerable amount of domestic and foreign goodwill and facilitated the
dominance of Haitian affairs by a clique of hard- line Duvalierist
cronies who later became known as the dinosaurs. The public displayed
more affection toward Jean-Claude than they had displayed for his more
formidable father. Foreign officials and observers also seemed more
tolerant toward "Baby Doc," in areas such as human-rights
monitoring, and foreign countries were more generous to him with
economic assistance. The United States restored its aid program for
Haiti in 1971.
Jean-Claude limited his interest in government to various fraudulent
schemes and to outright misappropriations of funds. Much of the
Duvaliers' wealth, which amounted to hundreds of millions of dollars
over the years, came from the R�gie du Tabac (Tobacco Administration).
Duvalier used this "nonfiscal account," established decades
earlier under Estim�, as a tobacco monopoly, but he later expanded it
to include the proceeds from other government enterprises and used it as
a slush fund for which no balance sheets were ever kept.
Jean-Claude's kleptocracy, along with his failure to back with
actions his rhetoric endorsing economic and public-health reform, left
the regime vulnerable to unanticipated crises that were exacerbated by
endemic poverty, including the African Swine Fever (ASF) epidemic and
the widely publicized outbreak of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
(AIDS) in the 1980s. A highly contagious and fatal disease, ASF plagued
pigs in the Dominican Republic in mid-1978. The United States feared
that the disease would spread to North America and pressured Jean-Claude
to slaughter the entire population of Haitian pigs and to replace them
with animals supplied by the United States and international agencies.
The Haitian government complied with this demand, but it failed to take
note of the rancor that this policy produced among the peasantry. Black
Haitian pigs were not only a form of "savings account" for
peasants because they could be sold for cash when necessary, but they
were also a breed of livestock well-suited to the rural environment
because they required neither special care nor special feed. The
replacement pigs required both. Peasants deeply resented this intrusion
into their lives.
Initial reporting on the AIDS outbreak in Haiti implied that the
country might have been a source for the human immune deficiency virus. This rumor, which turned out to
be false, hurt the nation's tourism industry, which had grown during
Jean-Claude Duvalier's tenure. Already minimal, public services
deteriorated as Jean- Claude and his ruling clique continued to
misappropriate funds from the national treasury.
Jean-Claude miscalculated the ramifications of his May 1980 wedding
to Mich�le Bennett, a mulatto divorc�e with a disreputable background.
(Fran�ois Duvalier had jailed her father, Ernest Bennett, for bad debts
and other shady financial dealings.) Although Jean-Claude himself was
light-skinned, his father's legacy of support for the black middle class
and antipathy toward the established mulatto elite had enhanced the
appeal of Duvalierism among the black majority of the population. By
marrying a mulatto, Jean-Claude appeared to be abandoning the informal
bond that his father had labored to establish. The marriage also
estranged the old-line Duvalierists in the government from the younger
technocrats whom Jean-Claude had appointed. The Duvalierists' spiritual
leader, Jean-Claude's mother, Simone, was eventually expelled from
Haiti, reportedly at the request of Mich�le, Jean-Claude's wife.
The extravagance of the couple's wedding, which cost an estimated
US$3 million, further alienated the people. Popular discontent
intensified in response to increased corruption among the Duvaliers and
the Bennetts, as well as the repulsive nature of the Bennetts' dealings,
which included selling Haitian cadavers to foreign medical schools and
trafficking in narcotics. Increased political repression added to the
volatility of the situation. By the mid-1980s, most Haitians felt
hopeless, as economic conditions worsened and hunger and malnutrition
spread.
Widespread discontent began in March 1983, when Pope John Paul II
visited Haiti. The pontiff declared that "Something must change
here." He went on to call for a more equitable distribution of
income, a more egalitarian social structure, more concern among the
elite for the well-being of the masses, and increased popular
participation in public life. This message revitalized both laymen and
clergy, and it contributed to increased popular mobilization and to
expanded political and social activism.
A revolt began in the provinces two years later. The city of Gona�ves
was the first to have street demonstrations and raids on
food-distribution warehouses. From October 1985 to January 1986, the
protests spread to six other cities, including Cap Ha�tien. By the end
of that month, Haitians in the south had revolted. The most significant
rioting there broke out in Les Cayes.
Jean-Claude responded with a 10 percent cut in staple food prices,
the closing of independent radio stations, a cabinet reshuffle, and a
crackdown by police and army units, but these moves failed to dampen the
momentumof the popular uprising against the dynastic dictatorship.
Jean-Claude's wife and advisers, intent on maintaining their profitable
grip on power, urged him to put down the rebellion and to remain in
office.
A plot to remove him had been well under way, however, long before
the demonstrations began. The conspirators' efforts were not connected
to the popular revolt, but violence in the streets prompted
Jean-Claude's opponents to act. The leaders of the plot were Lieutenant
General Henri Namphy and Colonel Williams Regala. Both had privately
expressed misgivings about the excesses of the regime. They and other
officers saw the armed forces as the single remaining cohesive
institution in the country. They viewed the army as the only vehicle for
an orderly transition from Duvalierism to another form of government.
In January 1986, the unrest in Haiti alarmed United States president
Ronald Reagan. The Reagan administration began to pressure Duvalier to
renounce his rule and to leave Haiti. Representatives appointed by
Jamaican prime minister Edward Seaga served as intermediaries who
carried out the negotiations. The United States rejected a request to
provide asylum for Duvalier, but offered to assist with the dictator's
departure. Duvalier had initially accepted on January 30, 1986. The
White House actually announced his departure prematurely. At the last
minute, however, Jean-Claude decided to remain in Haiti. His decision
provoked increased violence in the streets.
The United States Department of State announced a cutback in aid to
Haiti on January 31. This action had both symbolic and real effect: it
distanced Washington from the Duvalier regime, and it denied the regime
a significant source of income. By this time, the rioting had spread to
Port-au-Prince.
At this point, the military conspirators took direct action. Namphy,
Regala, and others confronted the Duvaliers and demanded their
departure. Left with no bases of support, Jean-Claude consented. After
hastily naming a National Council of Government (Conseil National de
Gouvernement--CNG) made up of Namphy, Regala, and three civilians,
Jean-Claude and Mich�le Duvalier departed from Haiti on February 7,
1986. They left behind them a country economically ravaged by their
avarice, a country bereft of functional political institutions and
devoid of any tradition of peaceful self-rule. Although the end of the
Duvalier era provoked much popular rejoicing, the transitional period
initiated under the CNG did not lead to any significant improvement in
the lives of most Haitians. Although most citizens expressed a desire
for democracy, they had no firm grasp of what the word meant or of how
it might be achieved.
Haiti - GEOGRAPHY
Haiti is a country of only about 28,000 square kilometers, about the
size of the state of Maryland. It occupies the western third of the Caribbean island of
Hispaniola (La Isla Espa�ola); the Dominican Republic takes up the
eastern two-thirds. Shaped like a horseshoe on its side, Haiti has two
main peninsulas, one in the north and one in the south. Between the
peninsulas is the Ile de la Gon�ve.
Northwest of the northern peninsula is the Windward Passage, a strip
of water that separates Haiti from Cuba, which is about ninety
kilometers away. The eastern edge of the country borders the Dominican
Republic. A series of treaties and protocols--the most recent of which
was the Protocol of Revision of 1936--set the 388-kilometer eastern
border, which is formed partly by the Pedernales River in the south and
the Massacre River in the north.
The mainland of Haiti has three regions: the northern region, which
includes the northern peninsula; the central region; and the southern
region, which includes the southern peninsula. In addition, Haiti
controls several nearby islands.
The northern region consists of the Massif du Nord (Northern Massif)
and the Plaine du Nord (Northern Plain). The Massif du Nord, an
extension of the central mountain range in the Dominican Republic,
begins at Haiti's eastern border, north of the Guayamouc River, and
extends to the northwest through the northern peninsula. The Massif du
Nord ranges in elevation from 600 to 1,100 meters. The Plaine du Nord
lies along the northern border with the Dominican Republic, between the
Massif du Nord and the North Atlantic Ocean. This lowland area of 2,000
square kilometers is about 150 kilometers long and 30 kilometers wide.
The central region consists of two plains and two sets of mountain
ranges. The Plateau Central (Central Plateau) extends along both sides
of the Guayamouc River, south of the Massif du Nord. It runs eighty-five
kilometers from southeast to northwest and is thirty kilometers wide. To
the southwest of the Plateau Central are the Montagnes Noires, with
elevations of up to approximately 600 meters. The most northwestern part
of this mountain range merges with the Massif du Nord. Southwest of the
Montagnes Noires and oriented around the Artibonite River is the Plaine
de l'Artibonite, measuring about 800 square kilometers. South of this
plain lie the Cha�ne des Matheux and the Montagnes du Trou d'Eau, which
are an extension of the Sierra de Neiba range of the Dominican Republic.
The southern region consists of the Plaine du Cul-de-Sac and the
mountainous southern peninsula. The Plaine du Cul-de-Sac is a natural
depression, twelve kilometers wide, that extends thirtytwo kilometers
from the border with the Dominican Republic to the coast of the Baie de
Port-au-Prince. The mountains of the southern peninsula, an extension of
the southern mountain chain of the Dominican Republic (the Sierra de
Baoruco), extend from the Massif de la Selle in the east to the Massif
de la Hotte in the west. The range's highest peak, the Morne de la
Selle, is the highest point in Haiti, rising to an altitude of 2,715
meters. The Massif de la Hotte varies in elevation from 1,270 to 2,255
meters.
The four islands of notable size in Haitian territory are Ile de la
Gon�ve, Ile de la Tortue (Tortuga Island), Grande Cayemite, and Ile �
Vache. Ile de la Gon�ve is sixty kilometers long and fifteen kilometers
wide. The hills that cross the island rise to heights of up to 760
meters. Ile de la Tortue is located north of the northern peninsula,
separated from the city of Port-de-Paix by a twelve-kilometer channel.
Ile � Vache is located south of the southern peninsula; Grande Cayemite
lies north of the southern peninsula.
Numerous rivers and streams, which slow to a trickle during the dry
season and which carry torrential flows during the wet season, cross
Haiti's plains and mountainous areas. The largest drainage system in the
country is that of the Artibonite River. Rising as the Lib�n River in
the foothills of the Massif du Nord, the river crosses the border into
the Dominican Republic and then forms part of the border before
reentering Haiti as the Artibonite River. At the border, the river
expands to form the Lac de P�ligre in the southern part of the Plateau
Central. The 400-kilometer Artibonite River is only one meter deep
during the dry season, and it may even dry up completely in certain
spots. During the wet season, it is more than three meters deep and
subject to flooding.
The ninety-five-kilometer Guayamouc River is one of the principal
tributaries of the Artibonite River. The most important river in the
northern region is Les Trois Rivi�res, or The Three Rivers. It is 150
kilometers long, has an average width of sixty meters, and is three to
four meters deep.
The most prominent body of water in the southern region is the
salt-water Etang Saum�tre, located at the eastern end of the Plaine du
Cul-de-Sac. At an elevation of sixteen meters above sea level, the lake
is twenty kilometers long and six to fourteen kilometers wide; it has a
circumference of eighty-eight kilometers.
Haiti has a generally hot and humid tropical climate. The north wind
brings fog and drizzle, which interrupt Haiti's dry season from November
to January. But during February through May, the weather is very wet.
Northeast trade winds bring rains during the wet season.
The average annual rainfall is 140 to 200 centimeters, but it is
unevenly distributed. Heavier rainfall occurs in the southern peninsula
and in the northern plains and mountains. Rainfall decreases from east
to west across the northern peninsula. The eastern central region
receives a moderate amount of precipitation, while the western coast
from the northern peninsula to Port-au-Prince, the capital, is
relatively dry. Temperatures are almost always high in the lowland
areas, ranging from 15� C to 25� C in the winter and from 25� C to 35�
C during the summer.
Haiti - Society
The population growth rate in Haiti's rural areas has been lower than
the rate for urban areas, even though fertility rates are higher in
rural areas. The main reason for this disparity is outmigration. People
in rural areas have moved to cities, or they have emigrated to other
countries, mostly the United States and the Dominican Republic. An
estimated 1 million people left Haiti between 1957 and 1982.
Many of the emigrants in the 1950s and the 1960s were urban
middle-class and upper-class opponents of the government of Fran�ois
Duvalier (1957-71). Throughout the 1970s, however, an increasing number
of rural and lower-class urban Haitians emigrated, too. In the 1980s, as
many as 500,000 Haitians were living in the United States; there were
large communities in New York, Miami, Boston, Chicago, and Philadelphia.
Thousands of Haitians also illegally emigrated to the United States
through nonimmigrant visas, while others entered the United States
without any documentation at all.
The first reports of Haitians' arriving in the United States, by boat
and without documentation, occurred in 1972. Between 1972 and 1981, the
United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) reported more
than 55,000 Haitian "boat people" arrived in Florida. The INS
estimated that because as many as half of the arrivals escaped
detection, the actual number of boat people may have exceeded 100,000.
An unknown number of Haitians are reported to have died during their
attempts to reach the United States by sea.
Though poorer than earlier immigrants, the boat people were often
literate and skilled, and all had families who could afford the price of
a passage to Florida. About 85 percent of these boat people settled in
Miami.
In September 1981, the United States entered an agreement with Haiti
to interdict Haitian boats and return prospective immigrants to Haiti.
Under the agreement, 3,107 Haitians had been returned by 1984.
Nevertheless, clandestine departures by boat continued throughout the
1980s. The Bahamas was another destination of Haitian emigrants; an
estimated 50,000 arrived there by boat during the 1980s. The Bahamas had
welcomed Haitian immigrants during the 1960s, but in the late 1970s, it
reversed its position, leading to increased emigration to Florida.
Since the early twentieth century, the Dominican Republic has
received both temporary and permanent Haitian migrants. The
International Labour Office estimated that between 200,000 and 500,000
Haitians resided in the Dominican Republic in 1983. About 85,000 of them
lived on cane plantations. In the early 1980s, about 80 to 90 percent of
the cane cutters in the Dominican Republic were reported to be Haitians.
Through an accord with the Haitian government, the Dominican Republic
imported Haitian workers to cut cane. In 1983 the Dominican Republic
hired an estimated 19,000 workers. Evidence presented to the United
Nations (UN) Working Group on Slavery revealed that the Dominican
Republic paid wages that were miserably low and that working and living
conditions failed to meet standards set by the two governments.
According to some reports, Haitian cane cutters were unable to leave
their workplaces, and they were prevented from learning about the terms
of the contracts under which they had been hired.
Emigration helped moderate Haiti's population growth. Furthermore,
annual remittances from abroad, estimated to be as high as US$100
million, supported thousands of poor families and provided an important
infusion of capital into the Haitian economy. At the same time,
emigration resulted in a heavy loss of professional and skilled
personnel from urban and rural areas.
Haiti.
As a result of the extinction of the indigenous population by the
beginning of the seventeenth century, the population of preindependence
Saint-Domingue (present-day Haiti) was entirely the product of the
French colonists' slaveholding policies and practices. The major
planters and government officials who constituted the ruling class
carefully controlled every segment of the population, especially the
majority of African slaves and their descendants. Society was structured
for the rapid production of wealth for the planters and their investors
in France.
In the colonial period, the French imposed a three-tiered social
structure. At the top of the social and political ladder was the white
elite (grands blancs). At the bottom of the social structure
were the black slaves (noirs), most of whom had been
transported from Africa. Between the white elite and the slaves arose a
third group, the freedmen (affranchis), most of whom were
descended from unions of slaveowners and slaves. Some mulatto freedmen
inherited land, became relatively wealthy, and owned slaves (perhaps as
many as one-fourth of all slaves in Saint-Domingue belonged to affranchis).
Nevertheless, racial codes kept the affranchis socially and
politically inferior to the whites. Also between the white elite and the
slaves were the poor whites (petits blancs), who considered
themselves socially superior to the mulattoes, even if they sometimes
found themselves economically inferior to them. Of a population of
519,000 in 1791, 87 percent were slaves, 8 percent were whites, and 5
percent were freedmen. Because of harsh living and working conditions,
many slaves died, and new slaves were imported. Thus, at the time of the
slave rebellion of 1791, most slaves had been born in Africa rather than
in Saint-Domingue.
The Haitian Revolution changed the country's social structure. The
colonial ruling class, and most of the white population, was eliminated,
and the plantation system was largely destroyed. The earliest black and
mulatto leaders attempted to restore a plantation system that relied on
an essentially free labor force, through strict military control, but the system collapsed during the tenure of
Alexandre P�tion (1806-18). The Haitian Revolution broke up plantations
and distributed land among the former slaves. Through this process, the
new Haitian upper class lost control over agricultural land and labor,
which had been the economic basis of colonial control. To maintain their
superior economic and social position, the new Haitian upper class
turned away from agricultural pursuits in favor of more urban-based
activities, particularly government.
The nineteenth-century Haitian ruling class consisted of two groups,
the urban elite and the military leadership. The urban elite were
primarily a closed group of educated, comparatively wealthy, and
French-speaking mulattoes. Birth determined an individual's social
position, and shared values and intermarriage reinforced class
solidarity. The military, however, was a means of advancement for
disadvantaged black Haitians. In a shifting, and often uneasy, alliance
with the military, the urban elite ruled the country and kept the
peasantry isolated from national affairs. The urban elite promoted
French norms and models as a means of separating themselves from the
peasantry. Thus, French language and manners, orthodox Roman
Catholicism, and light skin were important criteria of high social
position. The elite disdained manual labor, industry, and commerce in
favor of the more genteel professions, such as law and medicine.
A small, but politically important, middle class emerged during the
twentieth century. Although social mobility increased slightly, the
traditional elite retained their economic preeminence, despite
countervailing efforts by Fran�ois Duvalier. For the most part, the
peasantry continued to be excluded from national affairs, but by the
1980s, this isolation had decreased significantly. Still, economic
hardship in rural areas caused many cultivators to migrate to the cities
in search of a higher standard of living, thereby increasing the size of
the urban lower class.
<>The Upper Class
Haiti's peasantry constituted approximately 75 percent of the total
population. Unlike peasants in much of Latin America, most of Haiti's
peasants had owned land since the early nineteenth century. Land was the
most valuable rural commodity, and peasant families went to great
lengths to retain it and to increase their holdings.
Peasants in general had control over their landholdings, but many
lacked clear title to their plots. Haiti has never conducted a cadastral
survey, but it is likely that many families have passed on land over
generations without updating land titles. Division of land equally among
male and female heirs resulted in farm plots that became too small to
warrant the high costs of a surveyor. Heirs occasionally surveyed land
before taking possession of it, but more frequently, heirs divided plots
among themselves in the presence of community witnesses and often a
notary. Some inherited land was not divided, but was used in common, for
example, for pasture, or it was worked by heirs in rotation. Families
commonly sold land to raise cash for such contingencies as funerals or
to pay the expenses of emigration. Purchasers often held land with a
notarized paper, rather than a formal deed.
There were strata within the peasantry based on the amount of
property owned. Many peasants worked land as sharecroppers or tenants,
and some hoped eventually to inherit the plots they worked. Some tenant
farmers owned and cultivated plots in addition to the land they worked
for others. The number of entirely landless peasants who relied solely
on wage labor was probably quite small. Agricultural wages were so low
that peasants deprived of land were likely to migrate to urban areas in
search of higher incomes. Wealthier peasants maintained their economic
positions through the control of capital and influence in local
politics.
Peasants maintained a strong, positive identity as Haitians and as
cultivators of the land, but they exhibited a weak sense of class
consciousness. Rivalries among peasants were more common than unified
resentment toward the upper class.
Cooperation among peasants diminished during the twentieth century.
Farms run by nuclear families and exchanges among extended families had
formed the basis of the agrarian system. Until the middle of the
twentieth century, collective labor teams, called kounbit, and
larger labor-exchange groups were quite common. These groups were formed
to carry out specific tasks on an individual's land; the owner provided
music and a festive meal. After the 1940s, smaller groups, called eskouad,began
to replace the kounbit. The eskouad carried out tasks
on a strictly reciprocal basis or sold their collective labor to other
peasants.
Although Haitian peasant villages generally lacked a sense of
community and civic-mindedness, some civic-action groups had emerged
over the years. After the 1960s, wealthy peasants led rural community
councils, which were supervised by the government. These councils often
served more to control the flow of development resources into an area
than to represent the local population. In the 1980s, a countervailing
movement of small peasant groups (groupman) emerged with
support from the Roman Catholic Church, principally in the Plateau
Central. The groupman discussed common interests and undertook
some cooperative activities. Both the Duvalier governments and the
succeeding National Council of Government (Conseil National de
Gouvernement--CNG), headed by Lieutenant General Henri Namphy, took
steps to curb the activities of these peasant groups.
The first generation of Haitian peasants pursued selfsufficiency ,
freedom, and peace. The necessity of devoting at least some share of
their limited hectarage to the production of cash crops, however,
hindered the peasants' ability to achieve self-sufficiency in the
cultivation of domestic staples. Although they acquired a degree of
freedom, they also found themselves isolated from the rest of the nation
and the world. In the second half of the twentieth century, the Haitian
peasantry gradually became much less isolated. Several factors
accelerated the peasants' involvement with the outside world in the
1970s and the 1980s. Road projects improved the transportation system,
and foreign religious missions and private development agencies
penetrated the rural areas. These organizations brought new resources
and provided an institutional link to the outside world. Many people
from almost every community had migrated to Port-au-Prince or overseas,
and they sent money home to rural areas. Cassette tapes enabled
illiterate people who had traveled far from home to communicate with
their families. Creole, which became widely used on radio, brought news
of Haiti and the world to remote villages. And in 1986, media coverage
of the fall of the Duvalier regime put rural Haitians in touch with the
political affairs of the nation.
Haiti - Urban Lower Class
In rural areas, men and women played complementary roles. Men were
primarily responsible for farming and, especially, for heavy work, such
as tilling. Women, however, often assisted with tasks such as weeding
and harvesting. Women were responsible for selling agricultural produce.
In general, Haitian women participated in the labor force to a much
greater extent than did women in other Latin American countries. Haiti's
culture valued women's economic contribution to the farm in that all
income generated through agricultural production belonged to both
husband and wife. Many women also acquired sufficient capital to become
full-time market traders, and they were thus economically independent.
The income that they earned from nonfarm business activities was
recognized as their own; they were not required to share it with their
husbands.
The most common marital relationship among peasants and the urban
lower class was known as plasaj. The government did not
recognize plasaj as legitimate marriage, but in lowerclass
communities, these relationships were considered normal and proper. The
husband and wife often made an explicit agreement about their economic
relationship at the beginning of a marriage. These agreements usually
required the husband to cultivate at least one plot of land for the wife
and to provide her with a house. Women performed most household tasks,
though men often did heavy chores, such as gathering firewood.
For the most part, lower-class men and women had civil and religious
marriages for reasons of prestige rather than to legitimize marital
relations. Because weddings were expensive, many couples waited several
years before having them. In the 1960s, this pattern began to change
among Protestant families who belonged to churches that strongly
encouraged legal marriage and provided affordable weddings. It was not unusual for peasants to have more than one
marital relationship. Some entered into polygamous marriages, which only
a few men could afford.
Legal marriages were neither more stable nor more productive than plasaj
relationships. Also, legal marriages were not necessarily monogamous. In
fact, legally married men were often more economically stable than men
in plasaj relationships, so it was easier for them to separate
from their wives or to enter into extramarital relationships.
Men and women both valued children and both contributed to child
care, but women generally bore most of the burden. Parents were proud of
their children, regardless of whether they were born in a marital
relationship or as "outside children." Parents took pains to
ensure that all of their children received equal inheritances.
Family structure in rural Haiti has changed since the nineteenth
century. Until the early part of the twentieth century, the lakou,
an extended family, usually defined along male lines, was the principal
family form. The term lakou referred not only to the family
members, but to the cluster of houses in which they lived. Members of a lakou
worked cooperatively, and they provided each other with financial and
other kinds of support. Land ownership was not cooperative, however, and
successive generations of heirs inherited individual plots. Under the
pressure of population growth and the increasing fragmentation of
landholdings, the lakou system disintegrated. By the
mid-twentieth century, the nuclear family had become the norm among
peasants. The lakou survived as a typical place of residence,
but the cooperative labor and the social security provided by these
extended families disappeared. Haitian peasants still relied on their
kin for support, but the extended family sometimes became an arena for
land disputes as much as a mechanism for cooperation.
Family life among the traditional elite was substantially different
from that of the lower class. Civil and religious marriages were the
norm, and the "best" families could trace legally married
ancestors to the nineteenth century. Because of the importance of
intermarriage, mulatto elite families were often interrelated. Marital
relationships have changed somewhat since the mid-twentieth century.
Divorce, once rare, has become acceptable. Elite wives, once exclusively
homemakers surrounded by servants, entered the labor force in increasing
numbers in the 1970s and the 1980s. The legal rights of married women,
including rights to property, were expanded through legislation in the
1980s. In addition, the elite had a broader choice of partners as
economic change and immigration changed the composition of that group.
Haiti - LANGUAGE
French and Creole
Two languages were spoken in Haiti: Creole and French. The social
relationship between these languages was complex. Nine of every ten
Haitians spoke only Creole, which was the everyday language for the
entire population. About one in ten also spoke French. And only about
one in twenty was fluent in both French and Creole. Thus, Haiti was
neither a francophone country nor a bilingual one. Rather, two separate
speech communities existed: the monolingual majority and the bilingual
elite.
All classes valued verbal facility. Public speaking played an
important role in political life; the style of the speech was often more
important than the content. Repartee enlivened the daily parlance of
both the monolingual peasant and the sophisticated bilingual urbanite.
Small groups gathered regularly in Port-au-Prince to listen to
storytellers. Attitudes toward French and Creole helped to define the
Haitians' cultural dilemma.
Language usually complicated interactions between members of the
elite and the masses. Haitians of all classes took pride in Creole as a
means of expression and as the national tongue. Nevertheless, many
monolingual and bilingual Haitians regarded Creole as a nonlanguage,
claiming that "it has no rules." Thus, the majority of the
population did not value their native language and built a mystique
around French. At the same time, almost every bilingual Haitian had
ambivalent feelings about using French and did so uncomfortably. In
Creole the phrase "to speak French" means "to be a
hypocrite."
Fluency in French served as an even more important criterion than
skin color for membership in the Haitian elite. The use of French in
public life excluded the Creole-speaking majority from politics,
government, and intellectual life. Bilingual families used French
primarily for formal occasions. Because Creole was the language of
informal gatherings, it was filled with slang and was used for telling
jokes. Haitian French lacked these informal qualities. Monolingual
Creole speakers avoided formal situations where their inability to
communicate in French would be a disadvantage or an embarrassment. In an
attempt to be accepted in formal or governmental circles, some
monolingual Creole speakers used French-sounding phrases in their Creole
speech, but these imitations were ultimately of little or no use.
Middle-class bilinguals in Port-au-Prince suffered the greatest
disadvantage because they frequently encountered situations in which the
use of French would be appropriate, but their imperfect mastery of the
language tended to betray their lower-class origins. It was in the
middle class that the language issue was most pressing. The use of
French as a class marker made middle-class Haitians more rigid in their
use of French on formal occasions than Haitians who were solidly upper
class.
The origins of Creole are still debated. Some scholars believe that
it arose from a pidgin that developed between French colonists and
African slaves in the colonies. Others believe that Creole came to the
colony of Saint-Domingue as a full-fledged language, having arisen from
the French maritime-trade dialect. Whatever its origins, Creole is
linguistically a separate language and not just a corrupted French
dialect. Although the majority of Creole words have French origins,
Creole's grammar is not similar to that of French, and the two languages
are not mutually comprehensible.
There are regional and class variations in Creole. Regional
variations include lexical items and sound shifts, but the grammatical
structure is consistent throughout the country. Bilingual speakers tend
to use French phonemes in their Creole speech. The tendency to use
French sounds became common in the Port-au-Prince variant of Creole. By
the 1980s, the Port-au- Prince variant was becoming perceived as the
standard form of the language.
The use of French and Creole during the colonial and the independence
periods set speech patterns for the next century. During the colonial
period, it was mostly whites and educated mulatto freedmen who spoke
French. When the slaves gained their freedom and the plantation system
disintegrated, the greatest barriers among the various classes of people
of color collapsed. French language became a vital distinction between
these who had been emancipated before the revolution (the anciens
libres) and those who achieved freedom through the revolution, and
it ensured the superior status of the anciens libres. French
became the language not only of government and commerce, but also of
culture and refinement. Even the most nationalist Haitians of the
nineteenth century placed little value on Creole.
Attitudes toward Creole began to change during the twentieth century,
however, especially during the United States occupation. The occupation
forced Haitian intellectuals to confront their non-European heritage. A
growing black consciousness and intensifying nationalism led many
Haitians to consider Creole as the "authentic" language of the
country. The first attempt at a Creole text appeared in 1925, and the
first Creole newspaper was published in 1943.
Beginning in the 1950s, a movement to give Creole official status
evolved slowly. The constitution of 1957 reaffirmed French as the
official language, but it permitted the use of Creole in certain public
functions. In 1969 a law was passed giving Creole limited legal status;
the language could be used in the legislature, the courts, and clubs,
but not in accredited educational institutions. In 1979, however, a
decree permitted Creole as the language of instruction in the classroom.
The constitution of 1983 declared that both Creole and French were the
national languages but specified that French would be the official
language. The suppressed 1987 Constitution (which was partially
reinstated in 1989) gave official status to Creole.
<>Changes in Language
Use
Roman Catholicism is the official religion of Haiti, but voodoo may
be considered the country's national religion. The majority of Haitians
believe in and practice at least some aspects of voodoo. Most voodooists
believe that their religion can coexist with Catholicism. Most
Protestants, however, strongly oppose voodoo.
Voodoo
Misconceptions about voodoo have given Haiti a reputation for sorcery
and zombies. Popular images of voodoo have ignored the religion's basis
as a domestic cult of family spirits. Adherents of voodoo do not
perceive themselves as members of a separate religion; they consider
themselves Roman Catholics. In fact, the word for voodoo does not even
exist in rural Haiti. The Creole word vodoun refers to a kind
of dance and in some areas to a category of spirits. Roman Catholics who
are active voodooists say that they "serve the spirits," but
they do not consider that practice as something outside of Roman
Catholicism. Haitians also distinguish between the service of family
spirits and the practice of magic and sorcery.
The belief system of voodoo revolves around family spirits (often
called loua or mist�) who are inherited through
maternal and paternal lines. Loua protect their
"children" from misfortune. In return, families must
"feed" the loua through periodic rituals in which
food, drink, and other gifts are offered to the spirits. There are two
kinds of services for the loua. The first is held once a year;
the second is conducted much less frequently, usually only once a
generation. Many poor families, however, wait until they feel a need to
restore their relationship with their spirits before they conduct a
service. Services are usually held at a sanctuary on family land.
In voodoo, there are many loua. Although there is
considerable variation among families and regions, there are generally
two groups of loua, the rada and the petro.
The rada spirits are mostly seen as "sweet" loua,
while the petro are seen as "bitter" because they are
more demanding of their "children." Rada spirits
appear to be of African origin while petro spirits appear to be
of Haitian origin.
Loua are usually anthropomorphic and have distinct
identities. They can be good, evil, capricious, or demanding. Loua
most commonly show their displeasure by making people sick, and so
voodoo is used to diagnose and treat illnesses. Loua are not
nature spirits, and they do not make crops grow or bring rain. The loua
of one family have no claim over members of other families, and they
cannot protect or harm them. Voodooists are therefore not interested in
the loua of other families.
Loua appear to family members in dreams and, more
dramatically, through trances. Many Haitians believe that loua
are capable of temporarily taking over the bodies of their
"children." Men and women enter trances during which they
assume the traits of particular loua. People in a trance feel
giddy and usually remember nothing after they return to a normal state
of consciousness. Voodooists say that the spirit temporarily replaces
the human personality. Possession trances occur usually during rituals
such as services for loua or a vodoun dance in honor
of the loua. When loua appear to entranced people,
they may bring warnings or explanations for the causes of illnesses or
misfortune. Loua often engage the crowd around them through
flirtation, jokes, or accusations.
Ancestors (le m�) rank with the family loua as the
most important spiritual entities in voodoo. Elaborate funeral and
mourning rites reflect the important role of the dead. Ornate tombs
throughout the countryside reveal how much attention Haiti gives to its
dead. Voodooists believe the dead are capable of forcing their survivors
to construct tombs and sell land. In these cases, the dead act like
family loua, which "hold" family members to make them
ill or bring other misfortune. The dead also appear in dreams to provide
their survivors with advice or warnings.
Voodooists also believe there are loua that can be paid to
bring good fortune or protection from evil. And, they believe that souls
can be paid to attack enemies by making them ill.
Folk belief includes zombies and witchcraft. Zombies are either
spirits or people whose souls have been partially withdrawn from their
bodies. Some Haitians resort to bok�, who are specialists in
sorcery and magic. Haiti has several secret societies whose members
practice sorcery.
Voodoo specialists, male houngan and female manbo,
mediate between humans and spirits through divination and trance. They
diagnose illnesses and reveal the origins of other misfortune. They can
also perform rituals to appease spirits or ancestors or to repel magic.
Many voodoo specialists are accomplished herbalists who treat a variety
of illnesses.
Voodoo lacks a fixed theology and an organized hierarchy, unlike
Roman Catholicism and Protestantism. Each specialist develops his or her
own reputation for helping people.
Fran�ois Duvalier recruited voodoo specialists to serve as tonton
makouts to help him control all aspects of Haitian life. Duvalier
indicated that he retained power through sorcery, but because voodoo is
essentially a family-based cult, Duvalier failed to politicize the
religion to any great extent.
<>Roman Catholicism
Primary education was compulsory in the late 1980s, but scarce
government funds and a limited number of schools resulted in low
enrollments in many rural areas. The school year began in October and
ended in July, with two-week vacations at Christmas and Easter. Regular
primary education consisted of six grades, preceded by two years of
kindergarten (enfantin), which was heavily attended and which
counted statistically in primary enrollments. Primary education
consisted of preparatory, elementary, and intermediate cycles, each of
which lasted two years. Promotion between grades depended on final
examinations and on class marks recorded in trimesters. At the end of
the sixth year, students who had passed their final examinations
received a graduation certificate (certificat d'�tudes primaires).
After receiving the certificate, students could take examinations for
entry into either secondary school or higher-primary school that led to
an elementary certificate (brevet �l�mentaire) after three
years. It was therefore possible for a student to take two years of
kindergarten, six years of primary school, and three years of
higher-primary studies for a total of eleven primary-school years. This
primaryeducation system, however, was expected to change in the 1980s
because of measures included in the 1978 Education Reform.
Primary-school enrollment was estimated at 642,000 in 1981, more than
twice the official figure for 1970. According to the 1982 census, 40
percent of children in the six-year-old to eleven-year-old bracket were
enrolled in school, compared with only 25 percent in 1971.
Primary-school enrollment was 74 percent in metropolitan Port-au-Prince,
but it was only 32 percent in rural areas. Most primary-school students
were enrolled in private establishments in 1981, a reversal from the
previous decade. An increase in the number of private primary schools
accounted for the switch.
School nutrition programs, which increased about 12 percent annually
between 1976 and 1984, contributed to increased primaryschool
enrollments. By 1986 about three out of four students received meals at
school. The United States and Europe supported the meal programs through
surplus commodities. Private development agencies also provided support.
At the same time, a number of private agencies, mostly from the United
States, sponsored students in primary schools, helping to pay for
tuition, books, and uniforms. By 1985 at least 75,000 primary students
received such support. One-third of these students, however, were in
Port-au-Prince. Enrollments of rural children continued to be low.
Dropout rates for primary students were high. According to some
estimates for the mid-1980s, more than half of Haiti's urban
primary-school students dropped out before completing the sixyear
primary cycle. In rural areas, the dropout rate was 80 percent. In
addition, dropout and repetition rates in rural areas were so high that
three of every five primary-school students were in either first or
second grade.
There were more than 14,000 primary-school teachers in Haiti in the
early 1980s; however, only about 40 percent of the public primary-school
teachers and about 30 percent of those in private schools had a
secondary-level or teacher training certificate. In 1979 public school
teachers were earning US$100 a month--the same salary paid to teachers
in 1905, when the profession was considered prestigious. Private school
salaries were about 50 percent lower than those of public school
teachers. The National Council of Government (Conseil National de
Gouvernement--CNG), reacting to demonstrations by teachers, agreed to
raise salaries in 1986. Private school teachers' salaries, however,
remained low. Because of the low salaries, many teachers left the
profession.
In the 1970s, the Haitian government, with support from the World
Bank and the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO), began to reform its educational system, mostly at
the primary level. In 1978 the government unified educational
administration for the first time by putting rural schools under the
authority of the Department of National Education. Before 1978 rural
schools had been administered by the Ministry of Agriculture and Natural
Resources. The education reform also introduced a new structure for
primary classes, established Creole as the language of instruction, and
introduced new curricula and procedures for teacher certification. The
new structure consisted of ten years of primary education in one
four-year and two three-year cycles, followed by three years of
secondary education. Promotion from first to second grade and from third
to fourth grade was to be automatic in order to prevent large numbers of
students from repeating grades and overloading the system at the lower
grades. The new curriculum for first through fourth grades included
three months of study skills and classes in reading, writing,
mathematics, and environmental sciences.
Haiti - Secondary Education
Haiti's agricultural wealth, coveted by many in colonial times, had
waned by the mid-nineteenth century as land reform divided the island's
plantations into small plots farmed by emancipated slaves. Changes in
land tenure contributed significantly to falling agricultural output,
but the failure of Haiti's leaders to manage the economy also
contributed to the country's long-term impoverishment. Haiti's economy
reflected the cleavages (i.e., rural-urban, black-mulatto, poor-rich,
CreoleFrench , traditional-modern) that defined Haitian society. The
mulatto elite dominated the capital, showed little interest in the
countryside, and had outright disdain for the black peasantry.
Disparities between rural and urban dwellers worsened during the
twentieth century under the dynastic rule of Fran�ois Duvalier
(1957-71) and his son, Jean-Claude Duvalier (1971-86); Haiti's tradition
of corruption reached new heights as government funds that could have
aided economic and social development enriched the Duvaliers and their
associates. By the 1980s, an estimated 1 percent of the population
received 45 percent of the national income, and an estimated 200
millionaires in Haiti enjoyed a life of unparalleled extravagance. In
stark contrast, as many as three of every four Haitians lived in abject
poverty, with incomes well below US$150, according to the World Bank.
Similarly, virtually every social indicator pointed to ubiquitous
destitution.
As a result of the traditional passivity of the government and the
country's dire poverty, Haiti has depended extensively, since the
mid-1970s, on foreign development aid for budget support. The United
States has been the largest donor, but it has frequently interrupted the
flow of aid because of alleged human rights abuses, corruption, and
election fraud. Most other development agencies have followed the United
States lead, thus extending United States influence over events in
Haiti. Although the major multilateral and bilateral development
agencies have provided the bulk of foreign funding, hundreds of
nongovernmental organizations have also played a prominent role in
development assistance. These nongovernmental organizations, affiliated
for the most part with religious groups, have sustained hundreds of
thousands of Haitians through countrywide feeding stations. They also
contributed to the country's political upheaval in 1986 by underscoring
the Duvalier regime's neglect of social programs. The accomplishments of
the nongovernmental organizations have proved that concerted efforts at
economic development could achieve results in Haiti.
The prospects for development improved temporarily following
Jean-Claude Duvalier's February 1986 departure; some important economic
reforms took place, and the economy began to grow. Subsequently,
however, renewed political instability forestalled continued reform.
Economic progress was feasible, but entrenched political and social
obstacles prevented Haiti from reaching that goal.
Overall, Duvalier's policies had no positive effect in Haiti.
According to the United Nations (UN), Haiti was the only country in the
world that did not experience real economic growth for most of the 1950s
and the 1960s, a period when the world economy expanded at its most
rapid rate in history.
During the 1970s, Haiti enjoyed a 5 percent annual economic growth
rate as foreign aid, overseas investment, and higher commodity prices
buoyed the economy. A key factor in this growth was the 1973 renewal of
foreign aid from the United States and other donors after a ten-year
suspension. The rapid development of assembly manufacturing that began
in the late 1960s also stimulated economic expansion. Higher prices for
coffee, sugar, cacao, and essential oils boosted previously depressed
cash-crop production. Infrastructure development proceeded, construction
boomed, banking prospered, and tourist arrivals more than doubled. Haiti
modernized considerably, especially in Port-au- Prince and the major
provincial cities. Agriculture stagnated, however, and per capita food
production in real terms continued to decline. Jean-Claude Duvalier
showed some interest in developing the nonagricultural sectors of the
economy during his regime, and the state slowly expanded its role.
Haiti's fortunes soured in the 1980s, as real economic growth
declined by 2.5 percent a year from 1980 to 1985. Inflation rose over
the same period from 6 to 8 percent, and official unemployment jumped
from 22 percent to more than 30 percent. After an interval of positive
growth in 1986 and 1987, the negative growth trend continued in 1988,
when the economy contracted by 5 percent. Although the country's poor
performance in the 1980s to some extent reflected hemispheric trends,
Haiti faced its own peculiar obstacles, many of which stemmed from
decades of government indifference to economic development. Uneven
foreign aid flows, resulting from disputes over human rights violations
and a lack of progress toward democracy, hampered government
spending.Worsening ecological problems hindered agricultural
development, and tourist arrivals plummeted because of negative media
coverage of the island's political situation and the high incidence of
AIDS among Haitians.
The most fundamental problems of the Haitian economy, however, were
economic mismanagement and corruption. More avaricious than his father,
Jean-Claude Duvalier overstepped even the traditionally accepted
boundaries of Haitian corruption. Duvalierists under Jean-Claude engaged
in, among other activities, drug trafficking, pilferage of development
and food aid, illegal resale and export of subsidized oil, fraudulent
lotteries, export of cadavers and blood plasma, manipulation of
government contracts, tampering with pension funds, and skimming of
budgeted funds. As a result, the president for life and his wife lived
luxuriously, in stark contrast to the absolute poverty of most Haitians.
Allegations of official corruption surfaced when Duvalier appointed a
former World Bank official, Marc Bazin, to the post of finance minister
in 1982. Bazin sought to investigate corruption and to reform fiscal
accounting practices in connection with a 1981 International Monetary
Fund (IMF) economic stabilization agreement. More zealous than Duvalier
had anticipated, Bazin documented case after case of corruption,
determined that at least 36 percent of government revenue was embezzled,
and declared the country the "most mismanaged in the region."
Although quickly replaced, Bazin gave credence to foreign complaints of
corruption, such as that contained in a 1982 report by the Canadian
government that deemed Duvalier's Haiti a kleptocracy.
After the fall of Duvalier, the provisional National Council of
Government (Conseil National de Gouvernement--CNG) enacted numerous
policy reforms mandated by structural adjustment lending programs from
the IMF and the World Bank. These reforms included the privatization of
unprofitable state-owned enterprises, trade liberalization, and export
promotion. The CNG, however, never fully implemented the economic
reforms because of nagging political instability. At the close of the
decade, the economic direction of the military government, led by
Lieutenant General Prosper Avril, remained unclear.
Fiscal Policy
Despite irregularities in the allocation of funds under the Fran�ois
Duvalier regime, government revenues traditionally equaled, or
surpassed, budget outlays, technically yielding balanced budgets.
Jean-Claude Duvalier's unprecedented intervention in the economy in the
1980s, however, broke this tradition. The public sector under Duvalier
established, or expanded, its ownership of an international fishing
fleet, a flour mill, a cement company, a vegetable-oil processing plant,
and two sugar factories. Duvalierist officials based these investment
decisions primarily on the amount of personal profit that would accrue
to themselves, to Duvalier, and to the rest of his coterie. They ignored
the potential negative impact on the economy. Poorly managed, the
state's newly acquired enterprises drained fiscal accounts, causing the
overall public-sector deficit to reach 10.6 percent of GDP in fiscal
year (FY) 1985, despite sharp reductions in spending on already meager
social programs in accordance with an IMF stabilization program. In July
1986, the Ministry of Finance, under the CNG, revamped fiscal policies
through tax reform, privatization, and revisions of the tariff code.
Although the CNG greatly increased spending on health and education, the
reform measures served to lower the government's deficit to 7 percent of
GDP by FY 1987. General Avril's FY 1989 budget attempted further to
curtail deficit spending, but that prospect remained unlikely without
stable flows of economic assistance.
Expenditures
The misallocation of public revenues for private use and the low
government allocations for economic and social development have
contributed directly to Haiti's extreme poverty. After 1986, national
budgets included a significantly larger portion for development efforts,
but they continued to allocate the largest share--17 percent in FY
1987-88--to the armed forces and internal security forces. About 57
percent of FY 1988 expenditures were for wages and salaries; 26 percent,
for goods and services; 10 percent, for interest payments; 4 percent,
for extrabudgetary spending; and 3 percent, for transfers and subsidies.
Compared with previous budgets in the 1980s, this budget included
increased spending on wages and interest payments and decreased spending
on goods and services, as well as an allocation for unspecified
expenses. The FY 1989 budget continued these fiscal trends. The leading
expenditure items in the FY 1989 budget were defense (16.4 percent),
debt payments (15.8 percent), education (14.5 percent), health and
social services (13.7 percent), and finance, public service, and
commerce (12.4 percent). According to some reports, however,
discrepancies existed between budget allocations and actual
disbursements.
Revenues
The structure of government revenues changed distinctly as a
consequence of the tax and tariff revisions of 1986. Haiti's taxes and
tariffs historically exacted revenues from directly productive
activities--mainly agriculture--and from international trade. This
revenue structure eventually created disincentives for the production of
cash crops and other export products, while it stimulated the
development of uncompetitive industries. Over time, Haiti's authorities
created a public-finance pattern that, when combined with a highly
regressive income tax, raised approximately 85 percent of its revenue
from the rural population, but spent only about 20 percent on those same
taxpayers.
A 10 percent value-added tax was introduced in 1983, but it was not
until 1986 that tax and tariff reforms began to shift the source of
revenues. New tax laws simplified the income-tax process, altered tax
brackets, and strengthened tax-collection efforts. In the area of trade
regulations, the new government phased out export taxes and replaced
quantitative restrictions on all but five goods with ad valorem tariffs
of a maximum of 40 percent, thus essentially lowering import protection
and liberalizing trade. As a result of these policies, revenues derived
from international trade dropped from 35 percent in FY 1984 to an
estimated 22 percent in FY 1989; the revenue balance in both years was
derived from internal taxes.
Monetary and Exchange-Rate Policies
The Bank of the Republic of Haiti (Banque de la R�publique
d'Haiti--BRH) represented one of the few well-established, public-sector
institutions dedicated to economic management. Founded in 1880 as the
National Bank of Haiti, the BRH--a commercial bank--did not begin to act
as a central bank until 1934, when it became known as the National
Republic Bank of Haiti. Since the 1930s, the bank has performed the
functions of a central bank, a commercial bank, and a
development-finance institution; it also has been involved in other
matters, such as the management of the Port-au-Prince wharf. As a
central bank, the BRH also issued Haiti's national currency, the gourde.
On August 17, 1979, new banking laws gave the BRH its present name
and empowered it with the monetary-management responsibilities
associated with most central banks. The BRH subsequently became actively
involved in controlling credit, setting interest rates, assessing
reserve ratios, and restraining inflation. In the late 1980s, the BRH
pursued generally conservative monetary policies, and it employed high
cash-reserve ratios in commercial banks as the key policy tool to
regulate the money supply. In an effort to increase the dynamism of the
economy, the BRH sought to inject more credit into the private sector,
particularly for long-term uses.
Since 1919 the Haitian currency has been pegged to the United States
currency at the rate of five gourdes to the dollar. Since that same
date, the United States dollar has served as legal tender on the island
and has circulated freely. Remarkably, the value of Haiti's fixed
exchange rate remained strong for decades; it fluctuated only with the
movements of the currency of the United States, its main trading
partner. Until the 1980s, no black market existed for gourdes, but
unusually high inflation and large budget deficits eroded their value
and brought premiums of up to 25 percent for black-market transactions
in the early 1980s. The black market subsided considerably in the late
1980s, but the gourde's real rate of exchange remained above the 1980
level.
Haiti - LABOR
Haiti's 1989 labor force was estimated at 2.8 million people. The
economically active population (those over age ten), however,
represented more than half of the country's total 6.1 million
population. Forty-two percent of the official work force was female,
ranking the country's female participation as one of the highest among
developing countries. In rural areas, however, the role of women in
production and commerce was apparently much greater than these
statistics indicated.
The distribution of the labor force by economic sector from 1950 to
1987 reflected a shift from agriculture to services, with some growth in
industry. Despite these changes, agriculture continued to dominate
economic activity in the 1980s, employing 66 percent of the labor force;
it was followed by services, 24 percent, and industry, 10 percent. Based
on these figures, Haiti continued to be the most agrarian, and the least
industrial, society in the Western Hemisphere. The country's employment
of only 50,000 salaried workers in 1988 was further evidence of the
traditional character of the work force.
Statistics on employment and the methodologies used to gather such
data varied widely; most unemployment figures were only estimates. In
1987 the United States Department of Labor estimated that Haiti's
unemployment rate was 49 percent. Other estimates ranged from 30 to 70
percent. Official unemployment was severe in Port-au-Prince, but
comparatively low in rural areas, reflecting urban migration trends,
rapid population growth, and the low number of skilled and semi-skilled
workers.
Haiti established a labor code in 1961, but revised it in March 1984
to bring legislation more in line with standards set by the
International Labour Office (ILO). Conformity with ILO guidelines was a
prerequisite for certification under the Caribbean Basin Initiative
(CBI--see Appendix B) enacted by the United States Congress in 1983.
Haiti's most fundamental labor law, the minimum wage, was also the
most controversial. Low wage rates attracted foreign assembly
operations. In 1989 the average minimum wage stood at the equivalent of
US$3 a day, with some small variations for different types of assembly
work. The minimum wage in the late 1980s was below the 1970 level in
real terms, but assembly manufacturers and government officials refused
to increase wages because they needed to remain competitive with other
Caribbean countries. Labor laws included an array of provisions
protecting workers in the areas of overtime, holidays, night-shift work,
and sick leave. The government, however, did not universally enforce
many of these provisions. The greatest number of workers' complaints
came from assembly plants where seasonal layoffs were common.
The organized-labor movement, generally suppressed under the
Duvaliers, grew rapidly in the wake of the dynasty's collapse. Three
major trade unions dominated organized-labor activity in the 1980s. The
newest of these three was the Federation of Union Workers (F�deration
des Ouvriers Syndiqu�s--FOS). Established in 1983 after negotiations
over the CBI opened the way for public labor organization, the FOS by
1987 represented forty-four member unions, nineteen of which were
registered with the government. Its combined membership in
Port-au-Prince and Les Cayes totaled approximately 15,000. Politically
moderate, the FOS was affiliated with the American Federation of
Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) and with the
International Confederation of Free Trade Unions in Brussels. The oldest
union of influence, the Autonomous Federation of Haitian
Workers/Federation of Latin American Workers (Centrale Autonome des
Travailleurs Ha�tiens/Centrale Latino-Am�ricaine des
Travailleurs--CATH/CLAT), was affiliated with the Latin American
trade-union movement and shared its history of political activism.
CATH/CLAT consisted of 150 unions, including 63 that were registered
with the government. It professed a membership of 7,000. Haiti's third
principal union, the CATH, had splintered from CATH/CLAT in 1980; it had
managed to take with it forty-four member unions, all recognized by the
state. CATH claimed a membership of 5,000. CATH and CATH/CLAT primarily
represented assembly workers. The Ministry of Social Affairs registered
only unions and not individual members; this practice allowed unions to
exaggerate their membership, which probably amounted to fewer than 5,000
by 1987. By the end of the decade, trade unions had made only small
organizational inroads among assembly workers; the role of union
activity in that sector was the central point of debate in the
organized-labor movement.
Haiti - AGRICULTURE
After independence from France, Alexandre P�tion (and later
Jean-Pierre Boyer) undertook Latin America's first, and perhaps most
radical, land reform by subdividing plantations for the use of
emancipated slaves. The reform measures were so extensive that by 1842
no plantation was its original size. By the mid-nineteenth century,
therefore, Haiti's present-day land structure was largely in place. The
basic structures of land tenure remained remarkably stable during the
twentieth century, despite steadily increasing pressure for land, the
fragmentation of land parcels, and a slight increase in the
concentration of ownership.
For historical reasons, Haiti's patterns of land tenure were quite
different from those of other countries in Latin America and the
Caribbean. Most Haitians owned at least some of their land. Complex
forms of tenancy also distinguished Haitian land tenure. Moreover, land
owned by peasants often varied in the size and number of plots, the
location and topography of the parcels, and other factors.
Scholars have debated issues related to land tenure and agriculture
in Haiti because they considered census data unreliable. Other primary
data available to them were geographically limited and frequently out of
date. The three national censuses of 1950, 1971, and 1982 provided core
information on land tenure, but other studies financed by the United
States Agency for International Development (AID) supplemented and
updated census data. The final tabulations of the 1982 census were still
unavailable in late 1989.
The 1971 census revealed that there were 616,700 farms in Haiti, and
that an average holding of 1.4 hectares consisted of several plots of
less than 1 hectare. Haitians, however, most commonly measured their
land by the common standard, a carreau, equal to about 3.3
hectares. The survey concluded that the largest farms made up only 3
percent of the total number of farms and that they comprised less than
20 percent of the total land. It also documented that 60 percent of
farmers owned their land, although some lacked official title to it.
Twentyeight percent of all farmers rented and sharecropped land. Only a
small percentage of farms belonged to cooperatives. The 1950 census, by
contrast, had found that 85 percent of farmers owned their land.
Studies in the 1980s indicated a trend toward increased fragmentation
of peasant lands, an expanding role for sharecropping and renting, and a
growing concentration of higherquality land, particularly in the
irrigated plains. As a consequence of high rural population density and
deteriorating soils, competition over land appeared to be intensifying.
Haiti's land density, that is, the number of people per square kilometer
of arable land, jumped from 296 in 1965 to 408 by the mid-1980s-- a
density greater than that in India.
The three major forms of land tenancy in Haiti were ownership,
renting (or subleasing), and sharecropping. Smallholders typically
acquired their land through purchase, inheritance, or a claim of
long-term use. Many farmers also rented land temporarily from the state,
absentee landlords, local owners, or relatives. In turn, renters
frequently subleased some of these lands, particularly parcels owned by
the state. Renters generally enjoyed more rights to the land they worked
than did sharecroppers. Unlike sharecroppers, however, renters had to
pay for land in advance, typically for a period of one year. The
prevalence of renting made the land market exceedingly dynamic; even
small farmers rented land, depending on the amount of extra income they
derived from raising cash crops. Sharecropping, also very common, was
usually a shorter-term agreement, perhaps lasting only one growing
season. Sharecropper and landowner partnerships were less exploitive
than those in many other Latin American countries; in most agreements,
farmers gave landowners half the goods they produced on the land.
Other land arrangements included managing land for absentee
landlords, squatting, and wage labor. The practice of having an on-site
overseer (j�ran) manage land for another owner, usually
another peasant residing far away, was a variation of sharecropping. J�rans
were generally paid in-kind for their custodial services. Overgrazing,
or unregulated gardening, was the most common form of squatting, which
took place on most kinds of lands, especially state-owned land. A small
minority of peasants were landless; they worked as day laborers or
leased subsistence plots. In addition, thousands of Haitians migrated
seasonally to the Dominican Republic as braceros (temporary laborers) to
cut sugarcane under wretched conditions.
Haiti - Land Use and Farming Technology
It is difficult to understand the complex variations in land tenancy
without an appreciation of land use and peasant attitudes toward land.
More mountainous than Switzerland, Haiti has a limited amount of
cultivable land. According to soil surveys by the United States
Department of Agriculture in the early 1980s, 11.3 percent of the land
was highly suitable for crops, while 31.7 percent was suitable with some
restrictions related to erosion, topography, or conservation. The
surveys revealed that 2.3 percent was mediocre because of poor drainage,
but was acceptable for rice cultivation, and 54.7 percent was
appropriate only for tree crops or pastures because of severe erosion or
steep slopes. According to estimates of land use in 1978, 42.2 percent
of land was under constant or shifting cultivation, 19.2 percent was
pasture land, and 38.6 percent was not cultivated.
The use of purchased inputs, such as fertilizers, pesticides,
machinery, and irrigation, was rare; farmers in Haiti employed
traditional agricultural practices more than did farmers in any other
part of the Western Hemisphere. Although Haitian farmers used increased
amounts of chemical fertilizers in the 1970s and the 1980s, their use of
an average of only seven kilograms per hectare ranked Haiti ahead of
Bolivia, only, among Western Hemisphere countries. Peasants applied
mostly natural fertilizers, such as manure, mulch, and bat guano. Large
landowners consumed most of the country's small amounts of chemical
fertilizers, and they benefited from subsidized fertilizers imported
from the Dominican Republic and mixed in Port-au-Prince. Five importers
controlled the 400,000 kilograms of pesticides that entered the country
each year; malariacarrying mosquitoes and rodents in the rice fields
were the main targets of pesticide application. Most rural cultivators
used small hand tools, such as hoes, machetes, digging sticks, and a
local machete-like tool called the serpette. There was an
average of one tractor per 1,700 hectares; most farmers considered such
machinery inappropriate for use on tiny plots scattered along deeply
graded hillsides. The insecurity of land tenure further discouraged the
use of capital inputs.
The amount of irrigated crop land in the 1980s, estimated at between
70,000 and 110,00 hectares, was substantially less than the 140,000
hectares of colonial times. Of the nearly 130 irrigation systems in
place, many lacked adequate maintenance, were clogged with silt, or
provided irregular supplies to their 80,000 users. By the 1980s, the
irrigation network had been extended as far as was possible.
The minimal amount of research on agriculture and the limited number
of extension officers that MARNDR provided gave little assistance to
already low levels of farming technology. Foreign organizations, such as
the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture, carried out
the most research. Foreign organizations also provided more technical
assistance in agriculture than the government.
Peasant attitudes and limited access to credit also helped to explain
the traditional nature of farming. Most observers blamed agricultural
underdevelopment on peasants' individualistic nature, their proclivity
toward superstition, and their unwillingness to innovate. Small farmers
also lacked access to credit. Informal credit markets flourished, but
credit was not always available at planting time. When credit was
available, it was usually provided at usurious rates. The country's
major public financial institutions provided loans to the agricultural
sector, but this lending benefited less than 10 percent of all farmers.
Major credit sources included the Agricultural Credit Bureau,
agriculture credit societies, credit unions, cooperatives, and
institutions created by nongovernmental organizations.
Haiti - Cash Crops
Despite its relative decline, coffee endured as the leading
agricultural export during the 1980s. The French had introduced coffee
to Haiti from Martinique in 1726, and soon coffee became an important
colonial commodity. Coffee production peaked in 1790, and it declined
steadily after independence. Production dropped precipitously during the
1960s. After a boom in prices and in the production of coffee in the
late 1970s, output declined again from 42,900 tons in 1980 to 30,088
tons by 1987. Coffee trees covered an estimated 133,000 hectares in the
1980s, with an average annual yield of 35,900 tons. Haiti was a member
of the International Coffee Organization (ICO), but found itself
increasingly unable to fulfill its ICO export quota, which stood at
300,000 bags, of 60 kilograms each, in 1988. Most analysts believed that
excessive taxation and the low prices afforded to peasant farmers had
contributed to the decline in coffee production.
Coffee provides one of the best examples of the market orientation of
Haiti's peasant economy. Most peasants grew coffee, usually alongside
other crops. More than 1 million Haitians participated in the coffee
industry as growers, marketers (known as Madame Sarahs), middlemen (sp�culateurs),
or exporters. The peasants' widespread participation throughout the
coffee industry demonstrated that they were not merely subsistence
farmers, but that they were also actively engaged in the market economy.
After harvest by peasants, female Madame Sarahs transported coffee to
local and urban markets and sold the beans. Middlemen, in turn, sold
coffee to members of the Coffee Exporters Association (Association des
Exportateurs de Caf�--Asdec), which set prices and thereby passed on
the traditionally high coffee-export taxes directly to producers.
Because of its prominent role in agriculture and the inequitable nature
of the trade, the coffee industry was the subject of numerous studies.
The majority of these studies highlighted imperfect competition and the
systematic enrichment of a small group of Port-au-Prince exporters.
Sugar was another cash crop with a long history in Haiti. Columbus
brought sugarcane to present-day Haiti on his second voyage to
Hispaniola, and sugar rapidly became the colony's most important cash
crop. After 1804, production never returned to preindependence levels,
but sugar production and low-level exports continued. Unlike the system
in other Caribbean countries, sugar in Haiti was a cash crop raised by
peasants rather than by large-scale plantations. The sugar harvest
dipped to under 4 million tons by the early 1970s, but it rebounded to
nearly 6 million tons of cane by the middle of the decade with a sharp
increase in the world price of the commodity. Lower world prices and
structural problems combined to cause a drop in sugar output in the
1980s; by the end of the decade, sugarcane covered fewer than 114,000
hectares of the coastal plains, and it yielded fewer than 4.5 million
tons annually.
Further expansion of the sugar industry faced serious deeprooted
obstacles. For example, the production cost of Haitian sugar was three
times more than the world price in the 1980s. Shifts in the world sugar
market, caused mainly by the international substitution of corn-based
fructose for sugarcane, exerted further pressure on Haitian producers.
One result of this situation was the practice of importing sugar, which
was then reexported to the United States under the Haitian sugar quota.
Reductions in Haiti's quota during the 1980s, however, limited exchanges
of this sort.
Total sugar exports dropped from 19,200 tons in 1980 to 6,500 tons in
1987. In 1981, 1982, and 1988 Haiti exported no sugar. Haiti's four
sugar mills closed temporarily on several occasions during the decade. The oldest mill, the Haitian American Sugar Company
(HASCO), was the only plant that maintained a large cane plantation.
Realizing the dim future for sugar, outside development agencies
proposed alternatives to sugar, such as soybeans, for Haiti's plains.
Cacao, sisal, essential oils, and cotton were other significant cash
crops. Cacao trees covered an estimated 10,400 hectares in 1987, and
they yielded 4,000 tons of cocoa a year. Mennonite missionaries played a
growing role in the cocoa industry, mostly around southern departments,
especially Grande'Anse. Sisal, exported as a twine since 1927, peaked in
the 1950s, as the Korean War demanded much of the nation's 40,000-ton
output. By the 1980s, however, Haiti exported an average of only 6,500
tons a year, mainly to the Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico. The
substitution of synthetic fibers for sisal reduced most large-scale
growing of the plant, but many peasants continued to harvest the natural
fiber for its use in hats, shoes, carpets, and handbags. The export of
essential oils, derived from vetiver, lime, amyris, and bitter orange,
peaked in 1976 at 395 tons. Exports leveled off at a little more than
200 tons during the 1980s, generating an average of US$5 million in
foreign exchange. Cotton cultivation peaked in the 1930s, before Mexican
boll weevil beetles ravaged the crop. Growers introduced a higher
quality of cotton, in the 1960s, which was processed in local cotton
gins and then exported to Europe. Cotton prices fell in the 1980s,
however, and cotton plantings shrank from 12,400 hectares in 1979 to
under 8,000 hectares by 1986. Exports ceased. Government policies in the
1980s emphasized diversification into nontraditional export crops that
would benefit under the terms of the CBI; the poor performance of
traditional cash crops enhanced the importance of these efforts for the
Haitian economy.
Haiti - Food Crops
Food crops fared somewhat better than cash crops in the 1980s, as
prices for cash crops dropped, and economic uncertainty increased.
Nonetheless, real per capita food production declined, and the country
continued to import millions of tons of grains. The trend toward
increased production of food crops had negative ecological consequences
as the planting and the harvesting of tuber staples accelerated soil
erosion. Haiti's peasants were already underfed. It was therefore
unlikely that farmers would grow tree crops in place of staples without
appropriate incentives.
Peasants cultivated a variety of cereals for food and animal feeds,
notably corn, sorghum, and rice. Corn, also referred to as maize, was
the leading food crop; it was sown on more hectares-- 220,000 in
1987--than any other crop. Farmers in southern departments grew corn
separately, but elsewhere they mixed it with other crops, mostly
legumes. Total production averaged approximately 185,000 tons during the
1980s; yields increased in some areas. Drought-resistant sorghum often
replaced corn during the second growing season as the leading crop, but
total hectares planted and total production averaged only 156,250 and
125,000 tons, respectively. Rice became an increasingly common cereal,
beginning in the 1960s, when increased irrigation of the Artibonite
Valley aided larger-scale farming. Rice production, however, fluctuated considerably, and it
remained dependent on government subsidies. An estimated 60,000 hectares
of rice yielded an average of 123,000 tons, from 1980 to 1987.
Tubers were also cultivated as food. Sweet potatoes, one of the
nation's largest crops, grew on an estimated 100,000 hectares, and they
yielded 260,000 tons of produce a year in the 1980s. Manioc, or cassava,
another major tuber, was mix-cropped on upwards of 60,000 hectares to
produce between 150,000 and 260,000 tons a year, much of which was for
direct consumption. The cultivation of yams, limited by the lack of deep
moist soils, took up only 26,000 hectares. The tropical Pacific tuber
taro, called malang� in Haiti, grew with other tubers on more
than 27,000 hectares.
Haitians also cultivated dozens of other food crops. Red, black, and
other kinds of beans were very popular; they provided the main source of
protein in the diet of millions. As many as 129,000 hectares provided
67,000 tons of beans in 1987. Banana and plantain trees were also common
and provided as much as 500,000 tons of produce, almost entirely for
domestic consumption. Although the flimsy trees were vulnerable to
hurricanes and to droughts, rapid replanting helped sustain the crop.
Mangoes, another tree crop, were a daily source of food, and they
provided some exports. Other food crops included citrus fruit, avocados,
pineapples, watermelons, almonds, coconut, okra, peanuts, tomatoes,
breadfruit, and mamey (tropical apricot). In addition, Haitians
grew a wide variety of spices for food, medicine, and other purposes,
including thyme, anise, marjoram, absinthe, oregano, black pepper,
cinnamon, cloves, nutmeg, garlic, and horseradish.
Haiti - Forestry
The development of assembly manufacturing in Haiti was an outgrowth
of the island's cheap labor, its proximity to the United States market,
the increasing multinational nature of modern firms, and changes in the
United States Tariff Code, which in 1962 began to exact duties only on
the value-added of products assembled overseas. Assembly
operations--typical examples included the sewing of garments, the
stuffing of toys, or the stringing of baseballs--grew modestly in the
depressed economic climate of the 1960s, but they accelerated rapidly in
the early 1970s in response to new fiscal incentives enacted by the
government. The warming of Haitian-United States relations after 1973
encouraged foreign investment. The number of assembly enterprises
swelled from only 13 companies in 1966 to 67 by 1973 and then to 127 by
1978. When the subsector peaked in 1980, an estimated 200 assembly firms
employed nearly 60,000 workers. Political instability, increased
regional competition under the CBI, nascent union activity, and the
failure of government institutions to attract further investment all
contributed to a decline in assembly investment and employment after
1986. In 1989 approximately 150 assembly companies employed only 41,000
workers, more than three-quarters of them women. Assembly exports
continued to expand, however, as a result of increased productivity on
the part of assembly exporters.
Despite the low wages paid to workers, future growth in the assembly
subsector was uncertain. Numerous constraints to growth included the
highest utility costs in the Caribbean, excessive shipping and
warehousing costs, underdeveloped infrastructure, a largely illiterate
work force, scarce managerial personnel, foreign-exchange shortages,
expensive or inferior-quality local inputs, political instability, and
the personalized nature of business activity. Some United States
officials predicted in the 1980s that Haiti would progress to become the
"Taiwan of the Caribbean." The implementation of the CBI,
however, appeared to hurt Haiti's position in assembly production, as
other countries, such as the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, and Costa
Rica, began to capitalize more effectively on the advantages of the
initiative. In the mid-1980s, more than 40 percent of all assembly
operations were owned by Haitians. The other operations were either
owned by firms based in the United States or jointly owned by Haitian
and United States interests. Asian investment in the country continued
to grow.
Four industrial parks catered to the assembly industry; two were run
by the government's National Industrial Park Company (Soci�t�
Nationale des Parcs Industriels--Sonapi) and two by a private company.
Most firms operated with short-term subcontracting arrangements under
which Haitian factories filled requests of American companies that
provided partial products, inputs, and machinery. Workers earned
piece-work wages, with a guaranteed minimum wage of US$3 a day in 1989,
and most made slightly more than that amount. These workers were among
the best paid in Haiti, but most of them supported an average of four
people on their wages.
The major products assembled in Haiti were garments, electronics,
baseballs, games, sporting goods, toys, footwear, and leather products.
The largest assembly activity in the late 1980s produced garments. The
fastest-growing activity produced electronics; it included
subcontracting work for the United States Department of Defense. One of
the island's major baseball producers, MacGregor Sporting Goods, decided
in 1988 to move its baseball-sewing operations to Mexico, however; and,
as a result of the deteriorating political situation in Haiti, other
assembly companies decided to fill their orders at the Free Zone of San
Isidro, Dominican Republic.
Many Haitians were eager to find jobs in the assembly sector, but
some criticized the effects of the industry on workers and on the
economy. For example, unions complained that new employees earned only
60 percent of the minimum wage for their first few months and that
short-term contracts and seasonal demand led to job instability and the
annual dismissal of as many as 5,000 workers with no compensation. Some
economists noted that, although assembly operations provided badly
needed urban jobs, these operations industries forged few linkages with
the rest of the economy. A few local plants utilized domestically
produced glue, thread, sisal, and textiles, but the overwhelming share
of producers opted for imported inputs, which were generally cheaper, of
better quality, and more plentiful. Finally, others disapproved of the
generous tax holidays and the duty-free imports that both domestic and
foreign manufacturers enjoyed.
Haiti - Domestic Manufacturing
Throughout Haiti's history, foreign trade has played a major economic
role. Trade provided crucial foreign exchange for Haiti, but the
structure of trade and government policies resulted in falling incomes
and poorly distributed wealth. In the mid-1980s, about twenty families
dominated the importation of basic consumer items. Traditionally,
government import-licensing schemes and tariff policies supported import
monopolies, a major cause of prevailing high consumer prices. This same
structure also permitted the plentiful importation of luxury items at
relatively low tariffs. A small group of businessmen also controlled
exports, particularly coffee, and its members generally favored commerce
over more productive investment. The effects of major trade reforms
enacted in 1986 remained to be seen in the late 1980s.
Officially, imports in 1987 reached US$307.7 million, the second
lowest level of the decade (after the 1986 level of US$303.2 million).
An export level of only US$198.4 million in 1987 created a trade deficit
of US$110 million. Not reflected in these data, however, were sizable
amounts of contraband. The structure of the country's imports changed
little during the 1980s. Foodstuffs continued to account for the
greatest share (19 percent) of imports in 1987, followed by machinery
and transport equipment (17 percent), manufacturing (16 percent),
petroleum (13 percent), chemicals (10 percent), edible oils (10
percent), and other categories (15 percent). The United States was the
leading exporter to Haiti, supplying 64 percent of all goods and
services in 1987.
In July 1986, the National Council of Government (Conseil National de
Gouvernement--CNG) swiftly introduced importliberalization policies that
eliminated all quantitative restrictions on import items, with the
exception of seven (later amended to five) basic consumer goods. Ad
valorem tariffs replaced import quotas; this reform also lowered other
tariffs significantly. At the same time, authorities began a complete
revision of the Tariff Code that resulted in markedly lower overall
protection by the end of 1986. In addition, the government revoked the
tariff subsidies enjoyed by state-owned enterprises. Additional trade
reform streamlined complex importlicensing schemes, which often favored
traditional merchants. The government also attempted to expedite customs
procedures, something the private sector had long advocated. Import
policies, however, conspicuously lacked a serious and comprehensive
policy to halt widespread smuggling.
Exports generally increased during the 1980s, but political
instability started to weaken export performance toward the end of the
decade. The structure of exports changed dramatically as the result of
the long decline in agriculture, the termination of bauxite mining, and
the implementation of the CBI. In 1987 manufacturing contributed 53
percent of total exports, followed by coffee (18 percent), handicrafts
(14 percent), essential oils (2 percent), cocoa (2 percent), and other
goods (11 percent). Agriculture, which accounted for 52 percent of
exports in 1980, contributed only 24 percent by 1987; exports of
traditional commodities, such as sugar, sisal, and meat, either declined
to insignificant levels or ceased altogether. Haiti exported goods
mostly to the United States, the destination of 84 percent of the
country's overseas sales in 1987. France and Italy, the main purchasers
of Haiti's coffee, accounted for 3 percent and 4 percent, respectively,
of 1987 exports. The balance of exports went to the Dominican Republic
(2 percent) and other West European and Latin American countries (7
percent).
Trade policy in the late 1980s strongly favored export promotion
within the framework of the CBI, the expansion of assembly
manufacturing, and the maintenance of the country's export
competitiveness. In an effort to generate more exports, the Duvalier
government solicited increased foreign investment through revisions in
the foreign investment code during 1985. With funding from AID, the
private sector in February 1987 established an export-promotion office
to spearhead new investment and to recoup the momentum of exports that
had been lost to political upheaval. Other economic reforms, such as
budget cuts that helped to maintain the value of the gourde, maintenance
of low minimum wages, and trade liberalization, were intended to
stimulate investment and exports. The duty-free entry of additional
Haitian goods into the United States under the CBI favored the overall
growth in exports. In a bid to revitalize traditional exports, the
government in 1986 also eliminated longstanding export taxes on coffee,
cocoa, sisal, and other items. Haiti had applied for membership in the
free-trade association, the Caribbean Community and Common Market
(Caricom), in the early 1970s, but it had not been accepted as of 1989.
Haiti - Government and Politics
WHEN IT SECURED ITS INDEPENDENCE from France, Haiti moved to the
forefront of political history. The Haitian Revolution took place at the
same period as the American and the French revolutions, and Haiti was
one of the first nations to abolish slavery. In some ways, however,
Haiti's political development lagged behind that of other nations. Its
government functioned like a protostate compared with the more modern
systems that evolved in other states. Authoritarianism, typical among
archaic states based on monarchy and despotism, characterized Haiti's
political history. Haitian governments historically had lacked
well-developed institutions, elaborate bureaucracies, and an ability to
do more than maintain power and extract wealth from a large peasant
base. Haiti's rural areas, where the majority of the population lives,
traditionally has benefited least from government expenditures, and they
have suffered for the past 500 years from virtually uninterrupted
military domination.
In the late 1980s, the Haitian political system was in a profound
state of crisis, which became acute during the waning months of 1985 as
swelling popular unrest led to the fall of the Jean-Claude Duvalier
government on February 7, 1986. After Duvalier's fall, a series of
short-lived governments ruled the country.
In retrospect, the post-Duvalier period may be viewed as a transition
to consolidation of longer-term control over the Haitian state by one
(or more) of several competing political factions. In mid-1989, however,
the political situation continued to be in a state of flux; many
claimants to power competed with each other, while Haiti's public
institutions languished. Even Haiti's armed forces, the country's most
powerful institution, suffered from factionalism, corruption, and a
general breakdown in the chain of command. Pressure to overhaul the
political system mounted. To a significant degree, the political crisis
of the transitional period pitted regressive Duvalierist elements, who
advocated complete or partial restoration of the ancien r�gime, against
popular aspirations for change.
The spectacle of five successive governments between February 1986
and September 1988 reflected the nation's political instability. This
period witnessed the election of a constituent assembly, the popular
ratification of a new constitution, repeated massacres of citizens
exercising their political rights- -such as the right to vote in free
elections--and battles between army factions. The succession of
governments included the decaying, hereditary dynasty of the Duvaliers;
the military-civilian National Council of Government (Conseil National
de Gouvernement--CNG) led by Lieutenant General Henri Namphy, that
underwent several changes in membership, leading to a reduction in the
size of, and the civilian representation in, the government; a
four-month civilian government headed by President Leslie F. Manigat,
who rose to power because the armed forces rigged the election; another
government headed by Namphy as military dictator, originating after a
coup against Manigat; and the replacement of Namphy by Lieutenant
General Prosper Avril in yet another military coup. Threats from army
factions and opposition from the old Duvalierist right wing continued to
plague the Avril government.
This apparent instability, however, tended to mask underlying
political continuities. Before the fall of the Duvaliers, the last
crisis of succession in Haiti had taken place in 1956-57, when President
Paul Magloire attempted to extend his constitutional term of office.
During the period following Magloire's overthrow, five governments rose
and fell within the nine-month period prior to the accession of Fran�ois
Duvalier to the presidency. There were also battles between competing
army factions during this period. From a longer perspective, the
postDuvalier period resembled the nineteenth century in Haiti, when
transitory governments held power between relatively long periods of
stability.
<>FROM DUVALIER TO
AVRIL, 1957-89
Although Fran�ois Duvalier came to power through elections in 1957,
he lost all credibility because of a fraudulent re-election in 1961, a
rigged referendum in 1964 that confirmed him as Haiti's president for
life, and the severe and unrelenting repression he dealt out, primarily
through the Volunteers for National Security (Volontaires de la S�curit�
Nationale--VSN), or tonton makouts (bogeymen). Duvalier
("Papa Doc") extended his illegitimate rule beyond his death
by naming his son JeanClaude ("Baby Doc") as his successor.
Jean-Claude Duvalier came to power in 1971, under the informal
regency of his mother, Simone Ovide Duvalier, and a small inner circle
of Duvalierists. As Jean-Claude matured and began to assert his power
independently of his mother and her advisers, some minor reforms in
Haitian life took place. By the late 1970s, Jean-Claude had restored
some freedom of the press and had allowed the formation of fledgling
opposition political parties as well as the organization of a human
rights league. This brief period of liberalization, however, ended with
the arrest and the expulsion of a number of union leaders, journalists,
party activists, and human-rights advocates in November 1980.
Representatives of the Roman Catholic Church and leaders of peasant
organizations also suffered arrest and intimidation. These arrests
heralded a period of heightened government repression that lasted
throughout the balance of Duvalier's tenure.
Duvalier's 1980 marriage to Mich�le Bennett resulted in Simone
Duvalier's exile and created new factional alliances within the ruling
group. The Duvalier-Bennett clique amassed wealth at an unprecedented
rate during the remainder of JeanClaude 's presidency for life. The
concomitant sharp deterioration in the already dismal quality of life of
most Haitians prompted Pope John Paul II to declare in a speech in Haiti
in 1983 that "things must change here." His call for social
and political justice signaled a new era of church activism in Haiti.
The 1983 promulgation of a new constitution--Haiti's twentieth since
1801--and the February 1984 legislative elections, heavily weighted in
favor of Duvalierist candidates, did little or nothing to legitimize
Duvalier's rule. These efforts were met by antigovernment riots in Gona�ves
in 1984 and 1985. In response, "Baby Doc" attempted to
manipulate further the "liberalized" system he had
established. Constitutional amendments, approved in 1985 by a fraudulent
referendum (a traditional Duvalierist legalism), created the post of
prime minister, confirmed the presidency for life as a permanent
institution, guaranteed the president the right to name his successor,
and provided for severe restrictions on the registration of political
parties. Duvalierists organized into the National Progressive Party
(Parti National Progressiste--PNP) in anticipation of future manipulated
elections. New outbreaks of popular unrest shattered Duvalier's plans,
however, and he was eventually forced into exile in February 1986.
The popular revolt, known in Creole as operation d�choukaj
(operation uprooting), sought to destroy the foundations of Duvalierism.
Its strikes and mass demonstrations reflected the Duvalier regime's
general loss of support. In response, the CNG annulled the Duvalierist
constitution and held elections for a constituent assembly in October
1986. This assembly produced a new constitution in 1987. Haitians
overwhelmingly ratified the document by popular vote on March 29, 1987.
At that point, a number of observers seemed optimistic about Haiti's
potential transition to democracy. This optimism proved short-lived,
however.
The Constitution mandated the formation of an independent electoral
council. The Provisional Electoral Council (Conseil Electoral
Provisoire--CEP), established in early 1987, initially fulfilled this
requirement. Relations between the CEP and the CNG, however, weakened,
and by June they had degenerated into open conflict over proposed
electoral guidelines. The CNG disbanded the CEP, proposed its own
electoral council, and abolished an important opposition trade union.
This attempt by the military-dominated CNG to control the electoral
process met with strong popular opposition. Strikes and civil unrest
eventually forced the CNG to reinstate the independent electoral
council, which set presidential elections for November 29, 1987, but
postponed local elections.
The presidential campaign was a volatile affair. Two presidential
candidates were assassinated, and controversy gripped the CEP with
regard to the application of Article 291 of the Constitution, which
banned participation by Duvalierist candidates. The campaign officially
opened in October, with thirty-five presidential candidates registered.
The CEP eventually recognized twenty-three of these candidates and
disbarred twelve as Duvalierists. In apparent retaliation, Duvalierist
provocateurs are reported to have burned CEP headquarters. By election
day, about 2.2 million voters--73 percent of the voting-age
population--had registered. Voter turnout on the morning of November 29
was reported to be heavy. Balloting was suspended, however, by
midmorning because armed paramilitary groups, linked to old tonton
makout leaders who were reportedly protected by certain army
officers, massacred an estimated 34 voters at the polls.
After the 1987 electoral debacle, the CNG announced the formation of
a new electoral council, controlled by the government, and scheduled new
elections for January 17, 1988. Four leading presidential candidates
withdrew from the race in protest over the military's attempts to
control the electoral process. The balloting went ahead as scheduled,
however, amid a low voter turnout and allegations of fraud. The CNG's
electoral council declared Leslie F. Manigat, of the small Coalition of
Progressive National Democrats (Rassemblement des D�mocrates Nationaux
Progressistes--RDNP) the winner. Manigat took office on February 7.
Namphy and the army deposed Manigat on June 20, following a dispute over
army appointments. Manigat made the mistake of trying to assert
constitutional control over the armed forces rather than serving as a
figurehead. In response, Namphy and the army deposed Manigat on June 20
of that same year, and Haiti returned to direct military government for
the first time since 1956. Namphy formally rescinded the 1987
Constitution in July 1988.
Human-rights abuses increased during Namphy's tenure as the army did
little to discourage the violent backlash of Duvalierist groups. These
abuses climaxed on Sunday, September 11, when a group of former tonton
makouts entered the Church of Saint John Bosco in Port-au-Prince
(pastored by a prominent opposition priest), murdered a number of
worshipers, and set the church on fire. On September 17, noncommissioned
officers of the Presidential Guard (Garde Pr�sidentielle) ousted Namphy
and replaced him with Lieutenant General Prosper Avril. Avril proceeded
to purge the army command and the government cabinet in an attempt to
solidify his position. In October, Avril arrested fifteen soldiers and
noncommissioned officers who had helped to bring him to power.
In early 1989, instability intensified as labor unions and other
groups staged demonstrations throughout the country. In an attempt to
achieve some sort of stability, Avril convened a National Forum on
February 7, with strong participation from centrist politicians, to
explore the possibility of re-establishing an electoral calendar. In a
further conciliatory move, the government excluded key Duvalierists from
the forum. Avril also partially restored the 1987 Constitution on March
13. In line with the Constitution, the government announced the
formation of a new independent electoral commission, the Permanent
Electoral Council (Conseil Electoral Permanent--CEP). The CEP members
took office in April.
From April 2 to 8, factional struggles in the military evolved into
two attempted coups supported by old-line Duvalierists, former tonton
makout leaders, and high-level army officers implicated in drug
trafficking. Key elements of the Presidential palace guard, however,
remained loyal to Avril, who survived the coup attempts and emerged with
a strengthened hand. In an attempt to head off future challenges, Avril
abolished the rebel army units and began to disperse their troops into
scattered provincial outposts. Avril managed to retain power, but the
events of April 1989 had left the armed forces divided. The domestic
situation continued to be extremely unstable, and the future political
course of the nation was unpredictable.
Haiti - THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
Haitian heads of state have often drafted and abolished the nation's
constitutions at will, treating the documents as their own personal
charters. However, when the 1987 Constitution replaced the Duvalierist
1983 constitution, the popular referendum that ratified the Constitution
was free and fair; it demonstrated widespread support for the new
document. Nevertheless, the interim governments have not taken the
provisions of the Constitution seriously. Through a simple presidential
decree, Namphy suspended the document in 1988, and Avril only partially
reinstated it in 1989.
The 1987 Constitution is a modern, progressive, democratic document.
It guarantees a series of basic rights to the citizenry. It declares the
intent to establish democracy in Haiti, and it includes ideological
pluralism, electoral competition, and the separation of powers. Several
provisions seek to reshape the system and the political tradition
bequeathed to the nation by the Duvaliers. In particular, the
Constitution reduces the president's constitutional powers,
decentralizes governmental authority, and establishes elected councils
for local government. Police and army functions are disaggregated. The
Constitution also establishes an independent judiciary and subordinates
military personnel to civilian courts in all cases that involve
civilians. Under the Constitution, individuals are barred from public
office for ten years if they have served as "architects" of
the Duvalierist dictatorship, enriched themselves from public funds,
inflicted torture on political prisoners, or committed political
assassinations. The Constitution abolishes the death penalty and focuses
on the protection of civil rights through detailed restrictions on the
arrest and the detainment of citizens. It calls for the establishment of
a career civil service based on merit and for job security, and it
recognizes both Creole and French as official languages.
The Constitution establishes three major branches of
government--legislative, executive, and judicial--and notes that these
branches are essential to a civil state and that they must be
independent of each other. Legislative powers are vested in two
chambers, the House of Deputies and the Senate. Deputies and senators
are elected by direct suffrage. Deputies represent municipalities (or
communes), and senators represent geographic departments.
In the executive branch, the president of the republic serves as head
of state. A prime minister, chosen by the president from the majority
party in the legislature, heads the government. Other components of the
executive branch include cabinet ministers and secretaries of state.
The judiciary consists of the Court of Cassation (supreme court),
courts of appeal, and other smaller courts. The president appoints
judges on the basis of lists submitted by various elected bodies,
including the Senate and departmental and municipal assemblies.
The Constitution also provides for several special institutions and
autonomous governmental offices that include the CEP, the Superior Court
of Auditors and Administrative Disputes, the Conciliation Commission (a
body responsible for settling disputes between executive and legislative
branches and between the two houses of the legislature), the Office of
Citizen Protection (an ombudsman organization established to protect
citizens against abuse by the government), the State University of
Haiti, the Haitian Academy (responsible for standardizing the Creole
language), and the National Institute of Agrarian Reform.
The Constitution contains a number of provisions intended to guide
the country during transitions between elected governments. These
provisions include the creation of an electoral council with sufficient
autonomy to hold local and national elections, free of outside
interference. The Constitution calls for the replacement of the
provisional council by a permanent electoral council following a
transition to civilian government.
When General Avril reinstated the Constitution in March 1989, he
created an electoral council according to the constitutional formula,
but he also temporarily suspended thirty-eight articles. Under the
partially restored Constitution, the president of the military
government could exercise power until a presidential election was
organized. Legislative powers were similarly suspended pending
elections. The suspended constitutional elements included Article 42-1,
Article 42-2, and Article 42-3, which require the trial of military
personnel in civilian courts for charges of high treason or of conflicts
and abuses involving civilians. Other suspended articles refer to the
constitutional separation of powers among the executive, the
legislative, and the judicial branches of government and the military.
These suspensions immunized military personnel against legal charges
stemming from the constitutional protection of citizen rights. They also
allowed the military to carry out activities that the Constitution
reserved for the executive or the legislative branches.
Haiti - THE GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM
Avril's military government administered the country through a
cabinet that included thirteen ministerial portfolios as of mid-1989.
The most powerful of these posts was the Ministry of Interior and
National Defense, which combined administrative responsibilities over
the nation's armed forces and the police. As of mid-1989, no legislative
body existed in Haiti.
A number of military and civil jurisdictions existed throughout
Haiti. The jurisdictional system resulted in preferential treatment for
the government of Port-au-Prince over the rest of the country. Most
institutions were concentrated in the capital city. Moreover, the
military either ran or dominated the most elaborate institutions.At the
level of departments (d�partements) and rural communal
sections, a military office served as the sole government
representative. Thus, both the largest and the smallest subdivisions
were exclusively military jurisdictions.
Furthermore, the structure of jurisdictions and the distribution of
government institutions were generally asymmetrical. The military
subdivisions of departments (i.e., districts, subdistricts, and guard
posts) did not correspond to civil jurisdictions such as counties (arrondissements)
or municipalities. Units identified as police functioned only in
Port-au-Prince. The technical ministries, such as agriculture or public
health, generally did not maintain offices at the level of
municipalities or rural communal sections. At the municipality level,
the most widely diffused national civil institution was the tax office.
In any case, most people in Haiti lived in rural sections, where the
civil functions of government were virtually nonexistent.
Under transitional military government, the judiciary did not
function as the Constitution directed. Moreover, the formal structure of
the judiciary was in a state of flux. The Haitian judiciary had usually
had a marginal relationship to society, and it had generally failed to
protect the rights of citizens. The masses of the citizenry were largely
excluded from the duly constituted system of courts and due process.
Under the dictatorial rule of Fran�ois Duvalier, the court system was
virtually suspended.
Haiti derived the formal aspects of its legal system from Roman law,
the Napoleonic Code, and the French system of civil law. The highest
court, the Court of Cassation, consisted of a president, a vice
president, and ten judges. It functioned in two chambers, with five
judges in each but it would function as a whole when it heard appeals
and pleas of the unconstitutionality of laws and decrees. Judges of the
Court of Cassation had to be at least thirty years old, had to have
practiced law for at least ten years, and had to have held the position
of judge or public attorney for at least seven years.
Below the Court of Cassation were four courts of appeal, located in
Port-au-Prince, Les Cayes, Gona�ves, and Cap-Ha�tien. The court at
Port-au-Prince had a president and five judges, whereas the others had a
president and four judges. These courts heard both civil and criminal
cases, including all appeals from courts of first instance and criminal
appeals from justice of the peace courts when a serious matter was
involved. To be appointed to these courts, judges had to have been
either judges of courts of first instance for three years or military
advocates for at least ten years.
Courts of first instance were either civil tribunals or criminal
tribunals. Both were located in major cities. Each court had one judge
and various other officers. These courts heard many first-instance civil
cases and all criminal cases other than police matters. Judges in these
courts were required to have practiced law for at least two years.
The justice of the peace courts were located in each of the country's
126 municipalities and in other places. Each court had at least one
judge and other officials. According to the law, a justice of the peace
was required to have a law degree, to be at least twenty-five years old,
to be in full enjoyment of civil and political rights, and to have
completed a probationary period of at least one year. These courts heard
all cases involving limited amounts of money, including first-instance
cases. They also handled landlord and tenant cases. Their jurisdiction
in criminal matters extended only to cases where the penalty did not
exceed six months in jail.
In addition, there were special courts that dealt with administrative
contracts, property rights, juveniles, and labor conflicts.
The president of Haiti appointed all judges. Those in the Court of
Cassation and the courts of appeal served ten years; the others served
seven years.
Haiti - The Functions of the State
Throughout its history, Haiti's relative isolation has constrained
its foreign relations. Haiti achieved some prominence as a result of its
successful revolution, but the governments of slaveholding countries
either ignored or decried the country during the first half of the
nineteenth century. In the United States, the question of recognizing
Haiti provoked sharp debate between abolitionists, who favored
recognition, and slaveholders, who vehemently opposed such an action.
The advent of the Civil War, however, allowed President Abraham Lincoln
to recognize Haiti without controversy. Haiti became a focus of interest
for the great powers in the early twentieth century mainly because of
the country's strategic location. Competition among the United States,
Germany, France, and Britain resulted in the breaching of Haiti's
sovereignty and the nineteen-year occupation by United States forces. Subsequent isolation
stemmed from Haiti's cultural and linguistic uniqueness, its economic
underdevelopment, and from international condemnation of the repressive
Duvalier regimes.
Haiti has maintained a long-standing relationship with the United
States. Haitians have perceived economic ties to the United States as
vital. The United States was Haiti's primary trading partner for both
exports and imports, its most important source of foreign assistance,
and the primary target of Haitian emigration. A large number of private
voluntary agencies from the United States functioned in Haiti. The
assembly industry of Port-au-Prince was closely tied to the United
States economy. In short, the economic and the political influence of
the United States in Haiti was more powerful than the influence of any
other country.
Still, contemporary American diplomatic interest in Haiti has been
minimal. Washington's interest in Haiti arose chiefly because of the
country's proximity to the Panama Canal and Central America. Haiti also
controls the Windward Passage, a narrow body of water that could be
easily closed, disrupting maritime traffic. In the nineteenth century,
the United States considered establishing a naval base in Haiti. At about the time of World War
I, the United States occupied Haiti along with a number of other
countries in the Caribbean and Central America. Since the 1960s,
Washington has viewed Haiti as an anticommunist bulwark, partly because
of the country's proximity to Cuba. Fran�ois Duvalier, exploiting
United States' hostility toward the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro Ruz and
United States fears of communist expansion in the Caribbean, deterred
the United States government from exerting excessive pressure against
his own dictatorship.
In the 1980s, the United States expressed a special interest in
curbing illegal Haitian immigration. Washington also attempted to curtail shipments of illegal
drugs to and from Haiti.
From the 1970s until 1987, United States assistance to Haiti grew.
After the violently disrupted elections of November 1987, however,
United States president Ronald Reagan suspended all aid to Haiti. In
August 1989, President George Bush restored US$10 million in food aid
because the Avril government had made progress toward holding free
elections and had agreed to cooperate in efforts to control
international drug trafficking.
The Dominican Republic was the second most important country to Haiti
because the two nations shared a border, but the two countries were
ambivalent toward each other. Haiti supplied cheap labor to the
Dominican Republic, mostly to help harvest sugarcane. Under the
Duvaliers, this arrangement involved an annual intergovernmental
exchange of funds for the supply of cane cutters.
For generations Haitians had informally crossed the Dominican
Republic's border in search of work. An estimated 250,000 people of
Haitian parentage lived in the Dominican Republic. This perceived
"blackening" of the Dominican population motivated dictator
Rafael Le�nidas Trujillo Molina to carry out a notorious massacre of
Haitians in 1937. The border has been an issue of contention
in other respects as well. The Haitian economy has proved to be a
desirable market for Dominican products, effectively undercutting
Haitian production of certain commodities and reducing the domestic
market for some Haitian goods. Also, exiled Haitian politicians have
readily sought refuge in the Dominican Republic and have gained allies
there in efforts to bring down Haitian governments.
Ties with other Caribbean nations were limited. Historically, Britain
and France strove to limit contacts between their dependencies and
Haiti, in order to discourage independence movements. Haiti's cultural
and linguistic distinctiveness also prevented close relations in the
Caribbean. As of mid-1989, Haiti did not belong to the Caribbean
Community and Common Market (Caricom), and it had not been included in
the Lom�
Convention, although there had been some discussion
with Caricom officials on both points. Haiti also maintained few
productive relationships in Latin America.
Other countries important to Haiti included the primary donor
countries for foreign assistance, especially France, Canada, and the
Federal Republic of Germany. Haiti maintained special cultural ties to
France, even though the two countries were not major trading partners.
Haiti also enjoyed a supportive relationship with the Canadian province
of Quebec, one of the few linguistically compatible entities in the
Western Hemisphere; most Haitian �migr�s in Canada lived in Quebec,
and the majority of administrators of Canadian aid projects came from
Quebec. Haiti's memberships in international and multilateral
organizations included the United Nations and its associated
organizations, the Organization of American States, the InterAmerican
Development Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
In many ways, Haitians were proud of their history, particularly the
accomplishments of such revolutionary figures as Dessalines and
Toussaint. However, the nation has suffered both from its uniqueness and
from its similarity to other less developed nations. Largely isolated in
the Western Hemisphere, Haiti nonetheless has experienced political
instability, repression, and impoverishment equal to, or exceeding that
of, other Latin American states. As the 1990s approached, Haiti still
could not count itself among the democratic nations of the hemisphere,
despite the sincere desire of its people for some form of representative
government.
Haiti - Bibliography
Abbott, Elizabeth. Haiti: The Duvaliers and Their Legacy.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
Bellegarde-Smith, Patrick. In the Shadow of Powers: Dant�s
Bellegarde in Haitian Social Thought. (AIMS Historical
Series, No. 11.) Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press
International, 1985.
Cole, Hubert. Christophe: King of Haiti. New York: Viking,
1967.
Dash, J. Michael. Haiti and the United States: National
Stereotypes and the Literary Imagination. New York: St.
Martin's Press, 1988.
Davis, Wade. The Serpent and the Rainbow. New York: Simon
and Schuster, 1985.
Diederich, Bernard. "Swine Fever Ironies: The Slaughter of the
Haitian Black Pig," Caribbean, 14, No. 1, Winter
1985, 16-17, 41.
------. "The Troubled Island of Hispaniola: Riots in Haiti and the
Dominican Republic," Caribbean Review, 13, No. 3,
Summer 1984, 18-21, 45.
Diederich, Bernard, and Al Burt. Papa Doc: The Truth about
Haiti Today. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
Fauriol, Georges. "The Duvaliers and Haiti," Orbis: A Journal
of World Affairs, 32, No. 4, Fall 1988, 587-607.
Gingras, Jean-Pierre O. Duvalier, Caribbean Cyclone: The
History of Haiti and Its Present Government. New York:
Exposition Press, 1967.
Heinl, Robert Debs, Jr., and Nancy Gordon Heinl. Written in
Blood: The Story of the Haitian People, 1492-1971.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978.
James, C.L.R. The Black Jacobins. New York: Vintage, 1963.
Keegan, John E. "The Catholic Church in the Struggle Against
Duvalierism," America, 158, April 23, 1988, 429-32.
Laguerre, Michel S. "The Haitian Political Crisis,"
America, 155, December 27, 1986, 416-20.
Leyburn, James G. The Haitian People. (Rev. ed., with
introduction by Sidney W. Mintz.) New Haven: Yale University
Press, 1966.
Logan, Rayford W. Haiti and the Dominican Republic. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1968.
Luce, Phillip Abbott. Haiti: Ready for Revolution.
Washington: Council for Inter-American Security, 1980.
Maingot, Anthony P. "Haiti: Problems of a Transition to Democracy
in an Authoritarian Soft State," Journal of Interamerican
Studies and World Affairs, 28, No. 4, Winter 1986-87, 75-
102.
Moran, Charles. Black Triumvirate: A Study of Louverture,
Dessalines, Christophe--the Men Who Made Haiti. New York:
Exposition Press, 1957.
Morse, Richard M. "Haiti, 1492-1988." Pages 3-12 in Richard M.
Morse (ed.), Haiti's Future: Views of Twelve Haitian
Leaders. Washington: Wilson Center Press, 1988.
Nicholls, David. From Dessalines to Duvalier: Race, Colour, and
National Independence in Haiti. London: Cambridge
University Press, 1979.
------. "Haiti: The Rise and Fall of Duvalierism," Third World
Quarterly [London], 8, No. 4, October 1986, 1239-52.
------. "Past and Present in Haitian Politics." Pages 253-64 in
Charles R. Foster and Albert Valdman (eds.), Haiti--Today
and Tomorrow: An Interdisciplinary Study. Lanham,
Maryland: University Press of America, 1984.
Ott, Thomas O. The Haitian Revolution, 1789-1804.
Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1973.
Paley, William. "Haiti's Dynastic Despotism: From Father to Son to
. . .," Caribbean Review, 13, No. 1, Winter 1984, 13-
15, 45.
Paquin, Lyonel. The Haitians: Class and Color Politics.
Brooklyn, New York: Multi-Type, 1983.
Parkinson, Wenda. `This Gilded African' Toussaint
L'Ouverture. London: Quarter Books, 1978.
Price-Mars, Jean. So Spoke the Uncle (Ainsi Parla
1'Oncle). (Trans. and introduction, Magdaline W.
Shannon.) Washington: Three Continents Press, 1983.
Prince, Rod. Haiti: Family Business. London: Latin America
Bureau, 1985.
Rotberg, Robert I. "Haiti's Past Mortgages Its Future," Foreign
Affairs, 67, No. 1, 1988, 93-109.
Rotberg, Robert I., with Christopher K. Clague. Haiti: The
Politics of Squalor. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971.
Schmidt, Hans. The United States Occupation of Haiti, 1915-
1934. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press,
1971.
Tyson, George F., Jr. (ed.). Toussaint L'Ouverture. (Great
Lives Observed: A Spectrum Book Series.) Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Weinstein, Brian, and Aaron Segal. Haiti: Political Failures,
Cultural Successes. New York: Praeger, 1984.
CITATION: Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. The Country Studies Series. Published 1988-1999.
Please note: This text comes from the Country Studies Program, formerly the Army Area Handbook Program. The Country Studies Series presents a description and analysis of the historical setting and the social, economic, political, and national security systems and institutions of countries throughout the world.
TRY USING CTRL-F on your keyboard to find the appropriate section of text