Early History
Estonia's struggles for independence during the twentieth century
were in large part a reaction to nearly 700 years of foreign rule.
Before 1200 the Estonians lived largely as free peasants loosely
organized into parishes (kihelkonnad ), which in turn were
grouped into counties (maakonnad ). In the early 1200s, the
Estonians and the Latvians came under assault from German crusaders
seeking to impose Christianity on them. Although the Estonians'
resistance to the Teutonic Knights lasted some twenty years, the lack of
a centralized political organization as well as inferior weaponry
eventually brought down the Estonians in 1227. The Germans, moving from
the south, were abetted by Danish forces that invaded from the north and
captured Tallinn. Together with present-day Latvia, the region became
known as Livonia; the Germans and Danes settled down as nobility, and
the Estonians were progressively subordinated as serfs. During 1343-45
an Estonian peasant uprising against the German and Danish nobility
prompted the Danes to relinquish their control of northern Estonia to
the Germans. After this resistance was crushed, the area remained
generally peaceful for two centuries.
Commerce developed rapidly because Estonia's larger urban centers at
the time--Tallinn, Tartu, P�rnu, and Narva--were all members of the
Hanseatic League, an organization established by merchants of various,
mostly German, cities to protect their mutual trading interests. Still,
foreign rivalries over the strategic Livonian region began to reemerge
in the mid-sixteenth century as the fighting capacity of the Germans
diminished and that of neighboring Muscovy began to increase. The
ensuing twenty-five-year struggle for control of Livonia was
precipitated by an invasion by Ivan IV (the Terrible) (r. 1533-84) in
1558. The advancing Russians wiped out the disintegrating forces of the
Teutonic Knights and nearly succeeded in conquering the whole area.
However, Swedish and Polish intervention reversed the Russian gains and
forced Ivan eastward, back behind Lake Peipsi. Peace between Sweden and
Poland in Livonia was also slow in coming, with Sweden eventually
winning most of the territory by 1629. By this time, decades of war had
caused huge population losses (in some areas, over 50 percent),
affecting urban and rural areas alike.
Under Swedish rule, northern Estonia was incorporated into the Duchy
of Estland. The southern part, together with northern Latvia, became
known as Livland. This division of Estonian lands would last until 1917.
The German-based nobility in both areas retained and even strengthened
its position under Swedish suzerainty. Meanwhile, the Estonian peasants
saw their lot worsen as more and more of their land and output were
appropriated by seigniorial estates. Still, during the Swedish era,
Estonian education got its start with the founding of Tartu University
in 1632 and the establishment of the first Estonian parish schools in
the 1680s. Although the population also began to grow during this period
of peace, war and suffering once again were not far away. Swedish
hegemony during the late seventeenth century had become overextended,
making the Swedes' holdings a prime target for a newly expansionist
Russia.
In his first attempt to conquer Estland and Livland, during the Great
Northern War (1700-09), Peter I (the Great) (r. 1682-1725) met with
defeat at Narva at the hands of Sweden's Charles XII (r. 1697-1718). A
second campaign in 1708 saw Peter introduce a scorched-earth policy
across many parts of the area. The outcome was victory for Russia in
1710 and acquisition of a "window to the West." In taking
control of Estland and Livland for what would be the next 200 years,
tsarist Russia recognized the rights and privileges of the local German
nobility, whose members amounted to only a small fraction of the
population. Although the extent of the nobles' autonomy in the two areas
was always contested, especially under Catherine II (the Great) (r.
1762-96), the Baltic Germans did develop a strong loyalty to the Russian
tsars as guarantors of their landed privileges. German control over the
Estonian peasantry reached its high point during the eighteenth century.
Labor overtook taxes-in-kind as the predominant means of controlling the
serfs. The first real reforms of serfdom, which gave peasants some
rights, took place in 1804. In 1816 and 1819, the serfs were formally
emancipated in Estland and Livland, respectively.
By the mid-nineteenth century, the Estonians were fast developing
into an independent society and nation. The number of urbanized
Estonians had grown considerably, overtaking what had been German
majorities in the cities. Industrialization was also breaking down the
old order. An Estonian cultural awakening began in the 1850s and 1860s
(see Religion; Language and Culture, this ch.). Tsarist reaction and a
fierce Russification campaign in the 1880s could not extinguish the new
Estonian spirit, although for the most part Estonian demands continued
to focus on culture. Political demands for Estonian autonomy found
strong expression during the Revolution of 1905, and an All-Estonian
Congress was organized in Tartu that same year. Although radical
Estonian politicians such as Jaan Teemant and moderate leaders such as
Jaan T�nisson were deeply divided on tactics, there were widespread
calls from the Estland and Livland provinces for a unification of
Estonian lands and an official end to Russification. Repression of the
1905 movement was severe in Estland, although T�nisson's moderate
Estonian Progressive People's Party survived and went on to participate
in Russia's new assembly, the Duma. Amid the turmoil, Baltic Germans
also grew apprehensive; they would be upset even more with the outbreak
of World War I, which would pit Russia against their conationals.
The fall of the tsarist regime in February 1917 forced the issue of
Estonia's political future. Vigorous lobbying in Petrograd by T�nisson
and the large Estonian population living there forced the provisional
government to accept Estonia's territorial unification as one province
and the election of a provincial assembly, the Maap�ev, later that
year. The election results showed significant support for leftist
parties, including the Bolsheviks, Social Democrats, and Social
Revolutionaries. Voting was complicated, however, by the presence of
numerous military personnel from outside Estonia.
The Bolshevik takeover in Petrograd in November 1917 extended to
Estonia as well, until Germany occupied Estonia in February 1918. Most
of Estonia's other political parties realized they were caught between
the two forces and agreed to begin an active search for outside support.
Representatives were sent to the major European capitals to secure
Western recognition of an Estonian declaration of independence. As the
Bolsheviks retreated from Tallinn and the German occupation army entered
the city, the Committee of Elders (or standing body) of the Maap�ev
declared the country independent on February 24, 1918.
Estonia - Interwar Independence, 1918-40
In contrast to its later peaceful return to independence in 1991,
Estonia's first modern era of sovereignty began with a fifteen-month war
(1918-20) against both Russian Bolshevik and Baltic German forces. In
the end, the War of Independence took the lives of about 3,600 Estonians
and left about 14,000 wounded. In the Tartu Peace Treaty, which was
concluded with Russia in February 1920, Moscow relinquished all claims
to Estonia in perpetuity. A year later, Estonia gained international
recognition from the Western powers and became a member of the League of
Nations. In June 1920, Estonia's first constitution was promulgated,
establishing a parliamentary system.
With a political system in place, the new Estonian government
immediately began the job of rebuilding. As one of its first major acts,
the government carried out an extensive land reform, giving tracts to
small farmers and veterans of the War of Independence. The large estates
of the Baltic German nobility were expropriated, breaking its
centuries-old power as a class.
Agriculture dominated the country's economy. Thanks to land reform,
the number of small farms doubled to more than 125,000. Although many
homesteads were small, the expansion of landownership helped stimulate
new production after the war. Land reform, however, did not solve all of
Estonia's early problems. Estonian agriculture and industry (mostly
textiles and machine manufacturing) had depended heavily on the Russian
market. Independence and Soviet communism closed that outlet by 1924,
and the economy had to reorient itself quickly toward the West, to which
the country also owed significant war debts. The economy began to grow
again by the late 1920s but suffered another setback during the Great
Depression, which hit Estonia during 1931-34. By the late 1930s,
however, the industrial sector was expanding anew, at an average annual
rate of 14 percent. Industry employed some 38,000 workers by 1938.
Independent Estonia's early political system was characterized by
instability and frequent government turnovers. The political parties
were fragmented and were about evenly divided between the left and right
wings. The first Estonian constitution required parliamentary approval
of all major acts taken by the prime minister and his government. The
Riigikogu (State Assembly) could dismiss the government at any time,
without incurring sanctions. Consequently, from 1918 to 1933 a total of
twenty-three governments held office.
The country's first big political challenge came in 1924 during an
attempted communist takeover. In the depths of a nationwide economic
crisis, leaders of the Estonian Communist Party (Eestimaa Kommunistlik
Partei--EKP), in close contact with Communist International
(Comintern--see Glossary) leaders from Moscow, believed the time was
ripe for a workers' revolution to mirror that of the Soviet Union. On
the morning of December 1, some 300 party activists moved to take over
key government outposts in Tallinn, while expecting workers in the
capital to rise up behind them. The effort soon failed, however, and the
government quickly regained control. In the aftermath, Estonian
political unity got a strong boost, while the communists lost all
credibility. Relations with the Soviet Union, which had helped to
instigate the coup, deteriorated sharply.
By the early 1930s, Estonia's political system, still governed by the
imbalanced constitution, again began to show signs of instability. As in
many other European countries at the time, pressure was mounting for a
stronger system of government. Several constitutional changes were
proposed, the most radical being put forth by the protofascist League of
Independence War Veterans. In a 1933 referendum, the league spearheaded
replacement of the parliamentary system with a presidential form of
government and laid the groundwork for an April 1934 presidential
election, which it expected to win. Alarmed by the prospect of a league
victory and possible fascist rule, the caretaker prime minister,
Konstantin P�ts, organized a pre-emptive coup d'�tat on March 12,
1934. In concert with the army, P�ts began a rule by decree that
endured virtually without interruption until 1940. He suspended the
parliament and all political parties, and he disbanded the League of
Independence War Veterans, arresting several hundred of its leaders. The
subsequent "Era of Silence" initially was supported by most of
Estonian political society. After the threat from the league was
neutralized, however, calls for a return to parliamentary democracy
resurfaced. In 1936 P�ts initiated a tentative liberalization with the
election of a constituent assembly and the adoption of a new
constitution. During elections for a new parliament, however, political
parties remained suspended, except for P�ts's own National Front, and
civil liberties were only slowly restored. P�ts was elected president
by the new parliament in 1938.
Estonia - The Soviet Era, 1940-85
Although the period of authoritarian rule that lasted from 1934 to
1940 was a low point in Estonian democracy, in perspective its severity
clearly would be tempered by the long Soviet era soon to follow. The
clouds over Estonia and its independence began to gather in August 1939,
when Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Nazi-Soviet
Nonaggression Pact (also known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact), dividing
Eastern Europe into spheres of influence. Moving to capitalize on its
side of the deal, the Soviet Union soon began to pressure Estonia,
Latvia, and Lithuania into signing the Pact of Defense and Mutual
Assistance, which would allow Moscow to station 25,000 troops in
Estonia. President P�ts, in weakening health and with little outside
support, acceded to every Soviet demand. In June 1940, Soviet forces
completely occupied the country, alleging that Estonia had
"violated" the terms of the mutual assistance treaty. With
rapid political maneuvering, the regime of Soviet leader Joseph V.
Stalin then forced the installation of a pro-Soviet government and
called for new parliamentary elections in July. The Estonian Communist
Party, which had only recently reemerged from underground with fewer
than 150 members, organized the sole list of candidates permitted to
run. P�ts and other Estonian political leaders meanwhile were quietly
deported to the Soviet Union or killed. With the country occupied and
under total control, the communists' "official" electoral
victory on June 17-18 with 92.8 percent of the vote was merely window
dressing. On July 21, the new parliament declared Estonia a Soviet
republic and "requested" admission into the Soviet Union. In
Moscow, the Supreme Soviet granted the request on August 6, 1940.
For all the ups and downs Estonia's independent government
experienced during the interwar period, its termination by Stalin in
1940 was clearly not among the range of solutions favored by most
Estonians. Yet, chances of holding off the Soviet onslaught with an army
numbering about 15,000 men were slim at best. Thus, Estonia's only real
hope for the future lay in continued Western recognition of its de jure
statehood, which other European countries and the United States declared
in 1940. Over the next fifty years, this Western policy of token
recognition nearly fell into desuetude. Yet, the policy's survival into
the late 1980s would allow it to become a rallying point for Estonia's
new drive for independence. Thanks to this continuing Western
recognition, Estonia's calls for sovereignty from Moscow by early 1990
could not be considered merely secessionism. Rather, they represented
demands for the restoration of a state still existent under
international law. This appeal to international legality dating to 1940
would frustrate the attempts of Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev to
control Estonia and the other Baltic states in the late 1980s.
Estonia's absorption into the Soviet Union as the Estonian Soviet
Socialist Republic was interrupted in June 1941 by the German invasion.
Still, that one year of Soviet rule left a deep mark on the Estonians.
In addition to the takeover of their country and the rapid
nationalization of their capitalist economy, on June 13-14, 1941, before
the German invasion, Estonians also saw the mass deportation of some
10,000 of their countrymen to Siberia. Of those seized during the
one-night operation, over 80 percent were women, children, or elderly
people. The purpose of this action seemed to be to create terror rather
than to neutralize any actual threat to the regime. The 1941-44 German
occupation witnessed more repression, especially of Estonia's Jewish
population, which numbered about 2,000. In September 1944, as the Red
Army again neared Estonia, the memories of Soviet rule resurfaced
vividly enough to prompt some 70,000 Estonians to flee the country into
exile. These �migr�s later formed ethnic communities in Sweden, the
United States, Canada, Britain, Australia, and elsewhere, continuing to
lobby for Estonia's rights during the next fifty years. Altogether, from
1939 to 1945 Estonia lost over 20 percent of its population to the
turmoil of Soviet and German expansionism.
After the war, the Sovietization of Estonia resumed. The republic's
war-ravaged industry was rebuilt as a component of the centrally planned
economy. Agricultural collectivization was enforced, climaxing in March
1949 with another, more brutal wave of deportations involving some
25,000 people. The Estonian Communist Party was purged in 1950 of many
of its original native leaders; they were replaced by several prominent
Russified Estonians who had grown up in Russia. After Stalin's death in
1953, Nikita S. Khrushchev's liberalization also touched Estonia.
Efforts at economic reform were undertaken, and repression was eased. By
the late 1960s, consumerism had taken root, and intellectual life was
relatively vibrant. Following the Soviet Union's suppression of
Czechoslovakia's "Prague Spring" reform movement in 1968, the
trend toward openness suffered a reversal, but Estonia continued to
maintain a standard of living well above the Soviet average. In 1980,
during the period of stagnation under Soviet leader Leonid I. Brezhnev,
some 2,000 schoolchildren demonstrated in the streets of Tallinn against
a major Russification campaign launched from Moscow. Several dozen
Estonian intellectuals later came together to write their own protest
letter, but to no avail. Karl Vaino, the Russified Estonian leader of
the Estonian Communist Party at the time, was particularly hostile
toward dissent of any kind.
Estonia - The Pursuit of Independence, 1985-91
The dawning of glasnost (see Glossary) and perestroika
(see Glossary) in the Soviet Union initiated a period of liberalization
from which the dying superpower would never recover. Estonia seized on
this opportunity in 1987, beginning with public protests against a
phosphorus-mining project proposed by the central government that would
have seriously damaged the country's environment. Pressure for economic
reform became acute later in the year when a group of four Estonian
liberals put forth a plan for economic autonomy for the republic. In
1988 Estonia's "singing revolution" took off, energized by the
removal of Karl Vaino as Estonian Communist Party chief in June and his
replacement by a native son, Vaino V�ljas. In April the Estonian
Popular Front was founded as the capstone to a summer of political
activity unparalleled since 1940. This mobilization proved effective in
November when Estonia opposed attempts by Gorbachev to strengthen
central authority through changes in the Soviet Union's constitution. In
an act of defiance, the Estonian parliament, then known as the Supreme
Soviet, declared the republic's right to sovereignty on November 16. It
also called for a new union treaty to be drawn up to govern the Soviet
state.
By the spring of 1989, Estonia had thrown down the gauntlets of
political sovereignty and economic autonomy. A two-year effort to force
their acceptance by Moscow followed. On the political front, Estonia's
strongest strategy was to invoke history. At the Soviet Union's first
Congress of People's Deputies (see Glossary) in Moscow, in 1989,
Estonian and other Baltic deputies battled with Gorbachev to have the
Soviet Union reveal the true story of the Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Pact
in time for the fiftieth anniversary of the pact in August. Just days
before the anniversary, a commission charged with studying the pact
concluded that secret protocols dividing up Poland and the Baltic states
had indeed existed. Armed with this finding, Estonia literally linked up
with its Baltic neighbors on August 23 to form a 600-kilometer human
chain from Tallinn to the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, to draw worldwide
attention to the anniversary of the pact and to their cause. An
estimated 2 million Baltic residents participated in the show of unity,
but the action also elicited a harsh rebuke from Moscow several days
later. Tensions quickly mounted in Estonia, and the Estonian Popular
Front decided to cancel a major song festival and rally planned for
early September. In early August, Estonian nationalists had already been
shaken by their first confrontation with Soviet loyalists. Members of
the International Movement of Workers in the Estonian Soviet Socialist
Republic (Intermovement), primarily made up of ethnic Russians, had
staged strikes in Tallinn and northeastern Estonia protesting a set of
new electoral rules and a new language law requiring all service workers
to speak both Estonian and Russian. Many Russians in Estonia, fearful of
growing Estonian national feeling and of losing their privileges, looked
to Moscow for help. But direct intervention would not come.
Throughout the fall, independence sentiment continued to mount. In
October the Estonian Popular Front issued a campaign platform for
upcoming municipal elections in which it publicly endorsed full
independence. Meanwhile, more radical groups had begun organizing their
own campaign to restore independence, completely bypassing the Soviet
system. These groups, known as Estonian Citizens Committees, maintained
that because their country had been illegally occupied and annexed by
the Soviet Union and because the prewar republic still retained
international recognition, it could not legitimate Soviet authority by
negotiating "secession." Rather, Estonia had to insist on the
continuing legal authority of the prewar republic as the only sure way
to ward off Soviet attempts to keep it in the union. By invoking
international law, Estonia could also enlist Western support and
protection at a time when the Soviet Union needed good relations with
the West to facilitate its own reforms. By the fall of 1989, it was
clear that this argument and strategy would become essential to the
independence movement and, indeed, to politics thereafter.
To raise popular awareness of the independence issue, the Estonian
Citizens Committees mounted a year-long campaign to register all
citizens of the prewar republic and their descendants. Of an estimated 1
million such citizens, the grassroots movement succeeded in registering
about 700,000. It was this electorate that, according to the radical
committees, possessed the sole right to decide the future of
Soviet-occupied Estonia--not the Soviet-era Supreme Soviet, its
government, or even the half-million Soviet-era immigrants to Estonia
and their descendants, whom the committees claimed had taken up
residence under the terms of the Soviet occupation and who would later
be denied automatic citizenship. Rather, the committees asserted the
need to elect a new representative body to lead the independence
struggle and the restoration of the prewar republic. In February 1990,
they organized nationwide elections for a Congress of Estonia, which
held its first session the following month.
Although their campaign enabled the citizens committees and the
Congress to gain a fair amount of popular support, most Estonians were
not totally willing to forsake the Supreme Soviet because it, too, was
up for election in March 1990. The more moderate Estonian Popular Front
favored the Supreme Soviet as a more realistic path to independence. The
Estonian Popular Front campaigned heavily in March and won about forty
of the 101 seats. The Supreme Soviet elections also allowed all
residents of Estonia to vote, including Soviet-era immigrants and their
descendants. These were mostly Russians who, still led primarily by
Estonian Communist Party functionaries, finally elected a total of
twenty-seven pro-Soviet deputies. Although the two-thirds Estonian
majority consequently was slim, it was enough for the Supreme Soviet to
declare at its first full session, on March 30, the country's official
intention to reestablish its independence.
Unlike Lithuania's declaration of independence, Estonia's declaration
was not an outright break with the Soviet Union. Rather, it was an
attempt to find a compromise between the radical Congress of Estonia and
moderate Estonian Popular Front positions. Still, the message of
asserting independence from Moscow was the same. The Kremlin's reaction
was subdued; no economic sanctions were imposed on Estonia. Neither,
however, was any recognition accorded Estonia's dec-laration, nor were
any serious attempts made to begin talks with the new government in
Tallinn. In the meantime, therefore, Estonia attempted to shore up its
stance by finding new allies and initiating independent economic
policies. In May 1990, the leaders of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania met
formally in Tallinn to coordinate their strategy. In July
representatives of the three countries met for the first time with Boris
N. Yeltsin, who had just been elected chairman of the Russian Supreme
Soviet. Estonian politicians and government officials traveled in
Western Europe and the United States to renew Western contacts.
Domestically, in the fall of 1990 the Estonian government, led by
Estonian Popular Front leader Edgar Savisaar, began a series of moves to
assert the republic's economic independence and begin market reforms.
Financial contributions to the all-union budget were stopped, and
wide-ranging price reform was initiated. Plans for a separate currency,
begun in 1989, continued to be worked on. In October the government
dispatched militia forces to patrol the republic's border with Russia
and to control the movement of goods; control over western gateways
remained under Soviet control.
Moscow's bloody military assault on civilians in Vilnius and Riga in
January 1991 sent shock waves through Estonia as well. Although there
were no violent incidents in Estonia, Soviet loyalists staged a noisy
demonstration in Tallinn, and the government installed huge boulders in
front of the parliament building for protection. On January 12, Tallinn
was the site of a hastily organized summit meeting between the Baltic
leaders and Yeltsin, who supported the sovereignty of the three
republics against Gorbachev. Yeltsin and Estonian parliament chairman
Arnold R��tel signed a bilateral treaty recognizing the sovereignty of
each other's republic. When, later in the month, Gorbachev announced a
nationwide referendum on the issue of preserving the Soviet Union,
Estonia decided to preempt the ballot with a referendum of its own on
independence. The March 3 Estonian poll showed 78 percent in favor of
independence and indicated significant support for independence among
Russian residents--as much as 30 percent. Most Estonians boycotted the
Soviet referendum held two weeks later. With public opinion clearly
favoring independence, Gorbachev agreed to official talks with Estonia
beginning on March 28. The talks continued through August and the Moscow
coup, but no progress was made. Estonia refused to join negotiations for
a new union treaty, while the Kremlin avoided any specifics on
independence. The talks were further upset by several hit-and-run
attacks on Estonia's border outposts during the summer of 1991. These
were generally attributed to units of the Soviet Ministry of Internal
Affairs Special Forces Detachment (Otryad militsii osobogo
naznacheniya--OMON), commonly known as the Black Berets, over which
Gorbachev apparently had lost control.
Estonia - Independence Reclaimed, August 1991-October 1992
On the night of August 19, 1991, Estonia was caught up in the
uncertainty generated by the attempted coup in Moscow. A column of
Soviet light tanks and troop carriers had already started to move on
Tallinn as the commander of Soviet forces in the Baltics announced his
support of the coup. Fearing a total crackdown by the Soviet army, the
Estonian parliament met in emergency session on August 20. At 11:00
P.M., the Supreme Council, as the legislature was now known, passed a
final resolution declaring full independence and requesting de facto
international recognition. Volunteers were mustered to defend key
government buildings and communications centers; there was no bloodshed,
however. As Heinz Valk, an artist and a member of parliament, later
declared, "The coup in Moscow [gave] us a chance comparable to that
in 1918."
Once the coup finally collapsed, Estonia resumed its efforts to gain
international recognition and otherwise reestablish itself as an
independent state. Iceland was the first to acknowledge Estonian
independence, on August 22; Yeltsin's Russia was quick to follow, on
August 24. The United States hesitated until September 2. The Soviet
Union recognized Estonia on September 6. The process of state building
also began soon after the coup. In contrast to Latvia and Lithuania,
Estonia, in its August 20 independence declaration, took the additional
step of convening a constitutional assembly immediately to draft a new
basic law for the country. The assembly drew thirty members each from
the Supreme Council and the Congress of Estonia, thus defusing rivalries
between the two organizations. In mid-October the assembly settled on a
working draft focused on a generally parliamentary form of government.
Deliberations then slowed as the country got caught up in debates over
citizenship.
In Estonia's fight to regain independence, the overall strategy of
asserting the country's legal continuity as a state clearly had paid
off. Yet, in terms of offering a path for the future, this strategy had
many complications. One of these was the question of what to do with the
500,000 mostly Russian, Soviet-era immigrants living in Estonia. In 1990
the Congress of Estonia had been the first representative body to lay
down the principle that because these people had settled in Estonia
under Soviet rule, they were not automatically citizens of the legally
restored Estonian state. Rather, under independence they would have to
be "naturalized" on the basis of specific language and
residency criteria. This position was also argued as a means of better
integrating the mostly Russian noncitizen population, the majority of
whom did not speak Estonian. In mid-1991, as the independence struggle
seemed to languish, the Estonian government, led by Prime Minister Edgar
Savisaar, showed signs of readiness to compromise on the citizenship
issue in order to gain more local Russian support. However, after the
failed August coup and the immediate onset of full independence, the
Congress and other radical groups were emboldened to insist on the
principle of restricted citizenship. Thus, the Supreme Council decided
on November 11, 1991, to require the naturalization of all Soviet-era
immigrants to Estonia while automatically renewing the citizenship of
all prewar citizens and their descendants. In February 1992, the
parliament set naturalization terms, which included a two-year residency
requirement, the ability to speak conversational Estonian, and a
one-year waiting period after applying.
Although these terms were relatively mild, the implications in
Estonia's particular situation remained less than clear. Most Soviet-era
immigrants had already fulfilled the residency requirement, but at best
only 20 percent were prepared to meet the language requirement. Most
Russians living in Estonia had not bothered to learn the rudiments of
the national language, forcing Estonians to speak Russian to them
instead. It would take time for many to begin learning. In any case, the
naturalization procedures would delay nationalization for at least the
one-year waiting period. This outcome had serious implications because
the resident Russians would then be ineligible to vote in the September
1992 elections for a new parliament. As the only consolation to
noncitizens, the Constitu-tional Assembly later accorded them the right
to vote in local elections under the terms of the new constitution.
The citizenship issue generally heightened tensions between Estonians
and Russians. The more nationalistic Estonian deputies in parliament
began to accuse the moderate government of Savisaar of foot-dragging. In
January 1992, in the midst of a severe economic crisis and problems
securing heating oil, Savisaar asked parliament for emergency powers.
When the vote on emergency powers was taken on January 16, Savisaar won,
thanks only to the votes of several Russian deputies. This narrow margin
revealed the extent of Savisaar's unpopularity among the Estonian
deputies, and a week later he resigned. Savisaar's transportation
minister, Tiit V�hi, was charged with forming a new government, which
was billed as one of technocrats and caretakers in advance of
parliamentary elections in the fall.
As V�hi formed his regime, several major issues remained
outstanding. The new prime minister's first task was to oversee the
passage of the naturalization requirements for citizenship, which
occurred in late February. Then, the language and residency requirements
were put into effect. Thereafter, the draft constitution drawn up by the
Constitutional Assembly neared completion and required approval by
popular referendum. This referendum was set for June 28, 1992, with only
citizens allowed to participate. Alongside the proposed constitution, a
second question asked the people whether to allow the earliest
applicants for citizenship to vote on an exceptional basis in the
upcoming nationwide elections. Because these applicants numbered just
over 5,000, the gesture would be largely symbolic. However, a strong
campaign by nationalist Estonian parties led to the defeat of the
measure, 53 percent to 46 percent. The constitution was passed by a 91
percent majority.
On June 20, one week before the referendum, the V�hi government
completed its third remaining task: currency reform. On that day,
Estonian residents proudly cashed in their old, worn Russian rubles for
crisp, new Estonian kroons (for value of the kroon--see Glossary). The
kroon, pegged to the stable deutsche mark, would soon bring inflation
tumbling down and serve as the basis for a new economy (see Economy,
this ch.).
With the constitution approved and a new state structure in place,
the campaign began for Estonia's first post-Soviet elections. The
election of a new legislature, the Riigikogu, on September 20 would mark
the full restoration of the legal Republic of Estonia. On October 5,
1992, in its first session, the Riigikogu, which replaced the
transitional Supreme Council, issued a declaration establishing its
legal continuity with the prewar republic and declaring an official end
to the transition to independence announced two-and-one-half years
earlier.
Estonia - Geography
Population
According to 1989 census figures, Estonia had a population of
1,565,662 (see table 2, Appendix). By 1994 this number had dropped to an
estimated 1,506,927 as a result of negative natural growth rates and net
out-migration beginning in 1990. Females outnumbered males by some
100,000 in 1991 (see fig. 4). Seventy percent of the population was
urban. The birth rate in 1993 was 10.0 per 1,000 population, and the
death rate was 14.0 per 1,000.
Tallinn, the capital, is the largest city, with about 479,000
inhabitants in 1989. Tartu, the second most populous city, had about
113,000 residents in the same year, and Narva, on the Russian border,
had 81,000 (see table 3, Appendix). Since the late 1980s, many
place-names have had their pre-Soviet names restored. These include the
Saaremaa town of Kuressaare (formerly Kingissepa) and some 250 streets
throughtout the country.
In 1934 Estonia had a population of 1,126,413. War losses and Soviet
deportations brought that figure down to an estimated 850,000 by 1945.
During the Soviet era, the population grew steadily, fueled largely by
in-migration from other areas of the Soviet Union (see table 4,
Appendix). During the 1950s and 1960s, net in-migration accounted for
more than 60 percent of the total population growth. In recent years,
net migration has reversed, with some 84,000 people, mostly Russians,
having left between 1989 and 1993. In the mid-1990s, these trends were
continuing, though more slowly. Since 1992 Estonia has been offering
financial assistance to people wishing to resettle in Russia; in October
1993, it signed a treaty with Russia regulating repatriation and
resettlement. According to public opinion polls conducted in 1993 and
1994, however, the vast majority of local Russians were not inclined to
leave Estonia.
The reverse flow of migration is thought to have contributed in the
early 1990s to a slight rise in the Estonian proportion of the
population. In 1989 Estonians constituted only 61.5 percent of the
population, while Russians made up 30.3 percent, Ukrainians 3.1 percent,
Belorussians 1.7 percent, and Finns 1.1 percent; Jews, Tatars, Germans,
Latvians, and Poles constituted the remaining 2.3 percent. This was in
sharp contrast to 1934, when Estonians represented 88.2 percent of the
population and Russians only 8.2 percent. This demographic shift was a
major concern for Estonians, who feared losing control of their own
country. Another worrisome statistic for Estonians was their
disproportionately small share of the yearly natural population growth
(births minus deaths) until 1990 and their large share of the
population's decrease in 1991 (see table 5, Appendix). Although
Estonians dominate in the countryside, the Russian population in Estonia
is nearly 90 percent urban, living mainly in Tallinn and in the
northeastern industrial towns of Kohtla-J�rve, Sillam�e, and Narva.
Tallinn is about 47 percent Estonian. Kohtla-J�rve is only about 21
percent Estonian, Sillam�e 5 to 6 percent, and Narva 4 percent.
Estonia - Health
The Estonian language belongs to the Finno-Ugric family of languages,
closely related to Finnish and more distantly related to Hungarian. It
is among the most difficult languages in Europe, with fourteen cases for
the declension of nouns and complicated rules for their use. There are
no articles, however, nor any grammatical gender in Estonian. Indeed,
the same word is used for both "he" and "she": tema
. Over the years, the language has been standardized, but many dialects
and accents remain, especially on the islands. Most of the foreign words
used by Estonians come from German. Russian, Finnish, and English also
have influenced Estonian, especially in the formation of slang.
Estonian culture developed in earnest during the nineteenth-century
period of national awakening. Elements of Estonian peasant culture, such
as songs and folktales, were brought together by the country's first
cultural elite after 1850. Between 1857 and 1861, Friedrich Reinhold
Kreutzwald compiled and published the Estonian national epic, Kalevipoeg
(Son of Kalev), which was based on various folklore themes. Written in
verse, the epic tells the story of Kalevipoeg, the mythical ancient
ruler of Estonia. Another achievement of this period was the
establishment of Estonia's first regularly published Estonian-language
newspaper, Perno Postimees , originally published in P�rnu by
Johann Voldemar Jannsen in 1857. In 1878 Carl Robert Jakobson
established the newspaper Sakala , which would soon become a
major promoter of the cultural renaissance. Jakob Hurt, a schoolteacher
and Lutheran minister, organized a collection of folk songs in the 1880s
and gave several speeches extolling the value of Estonian culture.
The national literature had an earlier beginning, in the 1810s, with
the patriotic poetry of Kristjan Jaak Peterson. In the second half of
the nineteenth century, romanticism and love of country found equal
expression in the poetry of Lydia Koidula, Estonia's first woman poet
and a key figure of the cultural awakening. The first Estonian song
festival was organized in 1869 in Tartu, attracting some 800
participants and about 4,000 spectators. This event would become a major
tradition in Estonian cultural life and was held roughly every five
years. At the end of the nineteenth century, Estonian theater also got
its beginnings in Tartu with the formation of the Vanemuine theater
group.
During the first independence period, Estonian culture thrived.
During 1926-33 writer Anton Hansen Tammsaare published his five-volume
epic novel, T�de ja �igus (Truth and Justice), which covered
the period 1870-1930. Lyrical poetry grew with the works of Marie Under,
Henrik Visnapuu, and Betti Alver. In 1919 the Pallas art school was
founded in Tartu, giving rise and expression to several new artistic
currents. Architecture became a new mode of expression for Estonians as
the first architects were educated in Tallinn. Their works came to
include the parliament building on Toompea Hill and several
functionalist buildings in the resort town of P�rnu. The Estonian Drama
Theater was established in 1926, complementing the already existing
Estonia Theater, which featured operettas and ballet. By 1940 Estonia
had eleven professional or semiprofessional theaters.
The return of the Red Army in 1944 after the German occupation caused
much of Estonia's cultural elite to flee the country. Many writers and
poets settled in Sweden, where they continued to issue works through
their own publishing cooperative. Under Stalin, Estonian culture was
subordinated to the propagandistic needs of the regime. In 1950, as the
Estonian Communist Party was being purged, so too was Estonian culture.
Many writers and artists were accused of "formalism"
(adherence to bourgeois standards) or nationalism and were dismissed or
deported. It was only in the 1960s, during the thaw under Khrushchev,
that Estonian culture regained vibrancy, the result of increased foreign
contacts and the arrival on the scene of a new generation of writers,
artists, composers, and poets. The last category included Paul-Eerik
Rummo (appointed minister of culture in 1992), Jaan Kaplinski (elected a
member of parliament in 1992), and Hando Runnel. Novelist Jaan Kross
made his debut during this period as a writer of historical works; his
1978 book, The Czar's Madman , was published in English in 1993
to critical acclaim. Graphic art became popular in Estonia during the
1960s, as did abstractionism among painters. The Estonian music scene
saw the coming of age of Arvo P�rt, who would emigrate in 1980 to West
Germany; Veljo Tormis, a composer drawing on themes from Finno-Ugric
folk music; and Neeme J�rvi, who emigrated in 1980 and later became
director of the Detroit Symphony Orchestra. Song festivals still were
held continuously, often providing a popular outlet for national
feeling. In the place of the banned national anthem, the song My
Fatherland Is My Love , based on a poem by Lydia Koidula and music
by composer and conductor Gustav Ernesaks, became Estonians' de facto
an-them.
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, Estonian culture again felt
some of the cold drafts of official control, but by 1986 the influence
of glasnost began to stir cultural activity anew, this time far
into the realm of politics. One of the first groups to mobilize in 1987
was the Estonian Heritage Society, which led volunteer projects to
restore many of Estonia's cultural landmarks. At a 1986 writers'
conference, the first complaints were publicly aired about censorship
and Russification. In the main literary publications--Sirp ja Vasar
, Vikerkaar , and Looming --an unprecedented number of
articles began to appear dealing with hitherto banned topics. In April
1988, during a two-day public forum, nearly fifty of Estonia's most
prominent cultural figures met to voice their concerns about the state
of Estonia's culture, language, and people. Open criticism was leveled
against the old-guard party leadership of Karl Vaino, and demands were
made for real political reform. The forum was an awe-inspiring event for
the hundreds of thousands of Estonians who listened on radio; yet it was
only a prelude to the "singing revolution" that would follow
that summer.
During the next several years, many of Estonia's artists, poets, and
writers would become involved in politics. Thirteen cultural figures
were elected to the Supreme Soviet in 1990, nearly twenty to the
Riigikogu, the new legislature, in 1992. Culture suffered, however,
because of economic decline. Paper shortages in 1990 and 1991 limited
the number of books and literary journals that could be published. Art
supplies, in high demand, often were available only in exchange for hard
currency. Still, foreign contacts opened up completely with
opportunities to view new creative works and to spread Estonian culture
abroad. With independence again in hand, Estonia could look forward to
another era of free cultural development in a common European home.
Estonia - Economy
Estonia began its reform process in 1987 with the development of a
plan for economic autonomy within the Soviet Union. Drawing on examples
from both China and Hungary, the radical proposal called for an end to
central economic control over Estonia, a separate tax system, and the
adoption of a convertible ruble. Until then, it had been said that as
much as 90 percent of the Estonian economy was controlled from Moscow;
very little was left for the Estonians to decide for themselves. The
decline in living standards beginning in the early 1980s and the
"years of stagnation" were viewed as direct consequences of
this overcentralization. With Gorbachev calling for a
"restructuring" (or perestroika ) of the economy, the
Estonian proposal was meant to respond to and test this new call for
change. The idea was popular among Estonians, not least of all because
of the plan's name, Isemajandav Eesti, whose acronym, IME, also means
"miracle" in Estonian.
Despite initial resistance from the old-guard Estonian Communist
Party leadership, IME became official policy soon after the appointment
of native-born Vaino V�ljas as first secretary of the party in June
1988. Teams of economists were put to work mapping out the laws and
decrees that would enable the plan to begin by January 1, 1990. Much of
this work would improve Estonians' knowledge of reform economics by the
time more radical measures proved necessary. In May 1989, the Estonian
Supreme Soviet approved the plan by an overwhelming majority, sending it
on to the Supreme Soviet in Moscow. Kremlin bureaucrats, however, sought
to water down the scheme, injecting contradictory clauses that would
make the plan unworkable. While the final law passed by the Soviet
parliament accorded economic autonomy to Estonia, along with Latvia and
Lithuania, it also stipulated that all reform measures be in accord with
central Soviet laws.
In the following months, as the popular mood in Estonia shifted
toward full independence, it became clear that the IME plan, too, would
get nowhere within the increasingly outdated Soviet system. Still, many
of the details and general impetus of IME proved very useful for
economic reform down the road. In December 1989, the Estonian Supreme
Soviet voted to create a central bank, the Bank of Estonia, for the
republic as part of the plan for an eventual Estonian currency.
Price-reform policies were in full force by October 1990, and an
independent law on foreign trade was adopted. Prime Minister Edgar
Savisaar sought to broaden Estonia's economic contacts with other Soviet
republics, organizing several economic summits in Tallinn with Central
Asian and Caucasian leaders. A new tax system was put in place in
Estonia, replacing the state budget's dependence on enterprise turnover
taxes and phasing in income and sales taxes. In short, economic reform
simply was carried out without regard to the Kremlin.
By August 1991, with Estonia's leap to full independence, the economy
was beginning to feel the pain of both market reform and collapsing ties
to the Soviet Union. Gasoline shortages had been endemic since 1990, and
many enterprises were forced to cut production because of a lack of raw
materials previously imported from other Soviet republics. Lax Soviet
monetary policy also fueled Estonian inflation, undermining reform
efforts as long as the new country remained in the Russian ruble zone.
An unprecedented fuel and food shortage in January 1992 prompted Prime
Minister Savisaar to ask parliament for emergency powers to deal with
the crisis. Deputies in parliament, however, had lost confidence in
Savisaar, and in the ensuing political crisis he was forced to resign.
Savisaar was replaced by his transportation minister, Tiit V�hi.
A temporary fuel loan from Finland helped stabilize the situation,
but the need to hasten the introduction of Estonia's own currency became
apparent. Other economic reforms such as privatization and foreign trade
were also being held up by the country's dependence on the Russian
ruble.
On June 20, 1992, against earlier objections from the International
Monetary Fund (IMF--see Glossary), Estonia introduced its new currency,
the kroon. With only US$120 million in gold reserves and no
internationally backed stabilization fund, Bank of Estonia president
Siim Kallas said the country could wait no longer. At 800 exchange
points across the country, residents were allowed to exchange up to
1,500 rubles at a rate of ten rubles to one kroon. Excess cash was
exchanged at a rate of fifty to one. Bank accounts were converted in
full at ten to one. By the end of the three-day transition period, the
move was declared a success, with only minor glitches reported. For
stability, the kroon was pegged by special agreement to the deutsche
mark (DM) at EKR8 = DM1. This would make the kroon worth about 7.7
United States cents, or EKR13 = US$1. The kroon would be the only Baltic
currency to be officially pegged to any outside value.
Estonia - Economic Developments
Monetary and Fiscal Policy
The new Estonian currency became the foundation for rational
development of the economy. Money began to have clear value; the
currency supply could be controlled from Tallinn, not Moscow; and
long-term investment decisions could be made with greater confidence by
both the state and private enterprise. The president of the central
bank, Siim Kallas, made "hard money" the benchmark of his
policy. In return, the bank saw its reserves grow rapidly, to US$184
million by the end of 1992 and US$365 million by December 1993. The
central bank was independent of the government but subordinate to the
parliament. In addition to its president, the bank was managed by a
board of directors, whose chairman was also appointed by parliament.
Although the initial success of the kroon was gratifying, many fiscal
challenges remained that threatened to upset monetary policy in the
future. Among these was a high enterprise tax debt to the state. In
December 1992, this debt, mostly unpaid revenue taxes from large state
firms, amounted to about EKR565 million. A year later, this sum had
fallen to roughly EKR400 million, but the possibility that the state
might need to use its own funds to bail out these ailing firms remained.
Another danger to monetary stability was posed by the possible collapse
of several private banks in Estonia. In November 1992, the Bank of
Estonia ordered the shutdown of three private banks because of
insolvency. One of these was the Tartu Commercial Bank, which in 1988
had become the first private bank to be founded in the Soviet Union. Bad
loans, increased competition, and poor management were expected to force
other bank closures, with which the state would have to deal.
Following the enactment of reform laws during 1989-90, the state
budget in Estonia was broken into three parts: the central government
budget, local government budgets, and nine extrabudgetary funds. In 1993
(the first year for which figures are provided entirely in kroons), the
central state budget ran a surplus of EKR216 million on total revenues
of roughly EKR4.2 billion (US$323 million). This surplus, however, was
immediately spent in a secondary budget drawn up in October. The central
budget included the financing of government operations (ministries,
schools, police, cultural subsidies, and so forth) as well as roughly
EKR500 million in aid to cities and towns. About half of the revenue for
the central budget came from an 18 percent value-added tax (VAT--see
Glossary) on most goods and services. Another 35 percent came from
personal income and business taxes. Social welfare taxes on employer
payrolls went directly into the state's extrabudgetary social welfare
and health insurance funds, which amounted to slightly more than EKR2
billion. In all, general government taxes (including local taxes) in
1991 amounted to about 47.7 percent of GDP. Although successive
governments pledged to reduce the overall tax burden, the transition was
slow. In 1994 the previous three-tiered progressive tax scale was
replaced with an across-the-board income tax rate of 26 percent.
Estonia's central budget in 1995 was expected to total EKR8.8 billion,
exceeding the 1994 budget and its supplements by EKR2.3 billion, mainly
because of additional expenditures on social welfare, the civil service,
the police, and the border guard. It was to be a balanced budget,
nonetheless, for the second consecutive year. Various forms of taxation,
including the income tax, an 18 percent VAT, and a corporate tax were to
provide most of the revenue.
Wages and Prices
After the beginning of economic reform in Estonia, real wages dropped
precipitously. From the fourth quarter of 1989, when the first price
rises began, to the third quarter of 1991, when Estonia became
independent, real wages fell by more than half. Food prices rose an
estimated sevenfold as state subsidies were eliminated and the
population received only partial government compensation for the higher
prices. Fuel prices and apartment rents also increased. Inflation soared
even more after independence as trade with Russia broke down even though
Estonia remained in the ruble zone. In January 1992 alone, the
cost-of-living index rose 88 percent, and in February it rose another 74
percent. The average rate for the year was 1,000 percent according to
some estimates. Nominal monthly wages skyrocketed to keep pace, rising
from 648 rubles in May 1992 to 3,850 rubles by May 1993.
The introduction of the kroon in June 1992 did much to stabilize
wages and inflation. In 1993 increases in the consumer price index
averaged about 3.0 percent per month; in 1994 they averaged 3.5 percent
per month. The average monthly wage settled around EKR500 in August
1992. Thereafter, it began a steady climb, reaching roughly EKR1,200 by
the end of 1993. Yet, according to Arvo Kuddo, an official of the Bank
of Estonia, real wages in mid-1993 still amounted to only 95 percent of
their June 1992 levels and barely 50 percent of their levels from early
1991. In the meantime, wage differentials between the highest- and
lowest-paying jobs grew markedly, from 3.4 times to ten times. According
to the Estonian State Statistics Board, in mid-1993 the top 10 percent
of wage earners received 32.9 percent of all income, while the bottom 10
percent received only 2.1 percent. Residents of Tallinn had the highest
average monthly wage, some 20 percent above the national average.
Personal savings also declined during this period. In December 1992, 41
percent of survey respondents said they had no significant savings at
all. In 1993 some 17 percent said they were behind in paying their
utility bills for lack of money.
Employment
The complexion of the Estonian labor market changed rapidly in the
early 1990s in the wake of property reform and the growth of private
enterprise. In 1990 some 95 percent of the labor force was employed in
state-owned enterprises or on collective farms. Only 4.3 percent worked
in private cooperatives or on private farms. In 1993 a public opinion
survey indicated that less than half of the respondents now received
their main income from a state enterprise. As privatization continued
and the privately owned share of production increased, the share of
state employment was expected to drop even more. Industry (in both the
public and the private sectors) employed about 33 percent of workers in
1990; agriculture, 12 percent; education and cultural activities, 10
percent; construction, 10 percent; and trade and catering, 9 percent.
The remainder of the labor force engaged in a variety of other
activities in the services sector (see table 7, Appendix).
As of December 1, 1993, Estonia's official unemployment rate was
still very low, 1.7 percent, or 14,682 people. This figure represented
the proportion of working-age people officially registered as unemployed
with the government's Employment Board and hence receiving unemployment
benefits. During the second half of 1993, unemployment had in fact
steadily declined from a high of 22,699 in May. In addition, the number
of people on unpaid or partially paid leave declined during the first
half of the year. By contrast, however, more people were reported
working part-time, most often with their full-time workweek having been
reduced to three or four days. These people were not included in the
official figure. The highest official unemployment rates in December
1993 were in the towns of the southeast (V�ru, 5.3 percent; P�lva, 4.8
percent) and the northeast (Narva, 4.4 percent). Tallinn posted the
lowest unemployment rate (0.2 percent), with just 594 registered jobless
people. In 1994 official unemployment peaked at 2.3 percent in April,
then fell steadily to a rate of 1.4 percent in November, the lowest rate
among the Baltic states.
The official unemployment figures, however, did not tell the whole
story. The unemployment rate was based on the working-age population
(about 880,000 people), not the smaller number of active persons in the
population (about 795,000). In addition, the figure did not include
unregistered jobless people. In general, the low level of unemployment
benefits also discouraged many people from even registering as
unemployed. In October 1992, unemployment benefits in Estonia were
reduced from 80 percent to 60 percent of the minimum monthly wage.
Benefits were paid for 180 days with the possibility of a ninety-day
renewal. In 1993 the government allocated EKR90 million for an expected
40,000 unemployed but ended up disbursing only EKR30 million because of
the low number of registered jobless people. Still, in the final quarter
of 1993, the Economist Intelligence Unit estimated that the real level
of unemployment was as high as 10 to 12 percent.
Foreign Trade
An integral part of Estonia's transition to a market economy during
the early 1990s involved reorienting foreign trade to the West and
attracting foreign investment to upgrade the country's industry and
commerce. In 1990 only 5 percent of Estonia's foreign trade was with the
developed West, and of this, only 21 percent represented exports. About
87 percent of Estonia's trade was with the Soviet Union, and of that, 61
percent was with Russia. In 1991 trade with Western and other foreign
countries fell further as available hard currency for imports dried up
and as many producers of Estonian exports had to cut output because of a
lack of raw materials. Although trade with Russia struggled on during
the first half of 1991, trade relations broke down after independence
was attained in August. New agreements were signed in December 1991, but
precise licensing procedures and bilateral trade quotas took several
more months to work out. This delayed shipments of fuel and raw
materials to Estonia, causing a severe economic crisis.
The introduction of the Estonian kroon in June 1992 proved decisive
in stabilizing foreign trade. By the third quarter of 1992, Estonia
experienced strong growth in foreign trade, finishing the year with an
EKR136 million surplus. The total volume of trade amounted to nearly
EKR11 billion, two-thirds of that coming during the second half of 1992.
Moreover, by the end of the year, the very structure of Estonia's
foreign trade had begun to change. European countries accounted for 56
percent of Estonia's trade in 1992. While 28.4 percent of Estonia's
imports continued to be from Russia, 22.6 percent now came from Finland.
In 1993 Finland surpassed Russia as a source of Estonia's imports, 27.9
percent to 17.2 percent. The two countries were roughly equal as a
destination for Estonian goods, both accounting for just above 20
percent in 1992 and 1993 (see table 8, Appendix). Textiles constituted
Estonia's leading trade article in 1992, accounting for 14 percent of
exports. Among imports, Estonia primarily continued to receive mineral
products (27.2 percent) and machinery and equipment (18.3 percent) (see
table 9, Appendix).
In 1993 Estonia ran a trade deficit estimated at US$135 million. The
trade balance deteriorated partly because of the strength of the kroon
and partly because of a growing need for automobiles, agricultural
products, and other essential goods. There was a 131 percent increase in
imports from 1992 to 1993, compared with a 91.8 percent increase in
exports. This imbalance was offset by a strong increase in services,
leaving the country's current account in the black at EKR493 million.
The trade deficit, however, continued to swell, reaching an estimated
US$389 million in 1994.
Foreign Investment and Loans
Foreign investment in Estonia began during 1987-88 with the creation
of several dozen joint ventures under the Soviet Union's early reform
strategy. The number of joint ventures in Estonia grew steadily after
April 1990, when Estonian authorities began registering joint ventures
themselves. By January 1991, 232 joint ventures had been registered in
Estonia; by October 1991, there were 313. Finland led in the number of
joint ventures (159), but Sweden accounted for the most foreign capital
in Estonia (35 percent). In mid-1990 foreign investment also started
coming into Estonia via joint-stock companies--a more flexible form of
ownership for both foreign investors and local capital. Joint-stock
companies soon surpassed joint ventures as the prime attraction for
foreign capital, totaling 803 by October 1991. In fact, many joint
ventures later were converted into joint-stock companies. In September
1991, Estonia passed a new foreign investment law offering tax breaks
(new ventures were granted a two-year tax exemption) and import-export
incentives to foreign investors. This legislation stimulated further
activity. In 1993 foreign investors were also given the right to buy
land, but only through the purchase of privatized state enterprises.
Non-Estonians could not own more than 50 percent of the equity in joint
ventures without government permission.
From the beginning, foreign capital was heavily concentrated in
Tallinn. About 75 percent of the first joint ventures were established
in the capital; in March 1993, it was reported that 87 percent of all
foreign capital invested in Estonia was located in Tallinn and the
surrounding area. Although the government hoped that lower property
taxes and lower wages might eventually entice more foreign capital to
southern Estonia, most investors continued to be drawn to Tallinn for
its higher-quality communications, better-trained personnel, and broader
transportation opportunities.
Among individual countries, Sweden continued to lead all others in
both overall value of investments and as a percentage of total foreign
investment--37.7 percent in 1993 (see table 10, Appendix). Both the
Norwegian company Statoil and the Finnish firm Neste also were heavily
involved in the national economy, building gasoline stations across
Estonia. Tallinn's premier hotel, Hotel Palace, was owned by the
Estonian-Finnish consortium Fin-Est. In 1992 Coca-Cola set up a joint
venture with the Estonian bottling plant AS Tallinna Karastus-joogid to
produce soft drinks for the Estonian and Russian markets. In 1993 a
four-story office building, the Tallinn Business Center, was opened by a
United States development group.
Estonia's transition to a market economy during 1991-93 was eased
considerably by the availability of more than US$285 million in foreign
aid, loans, and credits. Receipt of this financial assistance was
facilitated by the fact that Estonia, unlike many of the other countries
of Eastern Europe, had no prior foreign debt. In addition, by claiming
legal status as a formerly occupied country, Estonia, along with the
other Baltic states, refused to accept liability for the Soviet Union's
foreign debt. Instead, it claimed--and received the rights to--more than
US$100 million worth of Estonian gold deposited in Western banks by the
prewar republic and frozen after 1940.
During 1992-93 Estonia received a total of about US$125 million in
humanitarian aid, including emergency shipments of fuel, grain, and
medical supplies. In August 1992, Estonia signed its first memorandum
with the IMF to secure a US$32 million loan from the IMF and US$30
million from the World Bank (see Glossary). The memorandum obligated the
Estonian government to balance its budget, to limit wage increases, to
privatize state enterprises, and to maintain a strict monetary policy.
Fourteen months later, the IMF released the first US$16 million of its
loan to Estonia, after it was satisfied that the government has
maintained its economic reforms. In early 1992, Estonia also had become
a member of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, from
which it would later receive a total of US$46 million in loans for
improving its energy industry. Other foreign loans were received from
Japan, the United States, Sweden, and the European Union (see Glossary),
among others (see table 11, Appendix). In addition, in December 1993 the
European Investment Bank gave Estonia a credit worth 5 million European
currency units (ECUs--see Glossary) for loans to small businesses. The
credit was the first from an ECU200 million fund allocated to Baltic
states through the European Union's Poland/Hungary Aid for Restructuring
of Economies (PHARE) program.
Property Reform
Privatization, or the selling off of state property, represented the
cornerstone of Estonia's efforts at property reform during 1990-93.
Although growth in simple private enterprise during this period
contributed to the country's shift to capitalism, the allocation to
private initiative of state-owned resources ranging from factories to
kiosks was considered a more formidable engine for encouraging economic
recovery. Much of Estonia's economy had been developed in accordance
with central Soviet planning requisites, and it was unclear at first how
viable many of Estonia's machine-building and metallurgical factories
would be in the context of its small national economy. The fate of these
enterprises remained unclear in the mid-1990s. In the meantime, however,
Estonia had launched a successful small- and medium-scale privatization
program, which showed impressive results after only two years. By August
1993, more than half of all registered Estonian enterprises were
privately owned.
As in many other East European countries, property reform in Estonia
was intimately linked to issues of property restitution. In Estonia's
case, this meant the return of, or compensation for, property
nationalized by the Soviet regime in 1940. Estonia's political strategy
for independence, with its stress on the illegality of Soviet rule,
raised corollary questions and debates during 1989-90 about the legality
of the Soviet Union's early nationalization of the economy. The
principle of a political restoration of the prewar republic also
generated pressures to recognize a kind of economic
restoration--recognition of the right of previous property owners to
reclaim their property or at least to receive just compensation. This,
it was argued, was a simple matter of fairness to society. Thus, the
tension between the equally compelling needs for efficient privatization
and for judicious restitution was acute. If one accepted the necessity
of fostering new economic activity, the imperative to privatize was
clear. Yet, in selling off state property, the government was in danger
of wrongfully profiting from the sale of property taken from Estonian
citizens in 1940. Determining which property could be privatized and
which property might have claims on it soon became a legal tangle with
long-term consequences.
Despite some individual warnings as to the cost and rationality of
such a move, in December 1990 the Estonian Supreme Soviet adopted a
resolution voiding the Soviet government's 1940 nationalization of
property and recognizing the continuity of all prewar property rights.
In addition, it set a deadline of December 27, 1991, for the submission
of claims to local government authorities for the return of property or
compensation. The authorities thereafter would decide upon the validity
of these claims. In June 1991, the parliament passed a second law laying
out the basic principles of property reform. Among this law's three
explicit objectives was one calling for the "redress of injustice
committed by the violation of property rights" under Soviet rule.
More than 200,000 property restitution claims were submitted, and much
work in municipal archives to verify the claims lay ahead.
Although opposed to restitution, the government of Prime Minister
Edgar Savisaar (1990-92) relented, with the stipulation that for any
prewar property radically altered during the Soviet era, such as
reconstructed factories, only compensation would be offered. In
addition, persons currently in houses and apartments subject to
restitution claims got assurance that they would not be summarily
evicted by the previous owners. With these ground rules, in June 1990
the Supreme Soviet passed the Law on Property, legalizing various forms
of property, including individually owned property. The government moved
to create the State Property Board (Riigivaraamet) in August to
supervise the privatization of at least small businesses and services,
which would help to stimulate the economy. These enterprises mostly had
been created during the Soviet era and thus were free from potential
restitution claims. In early 1991, the board began selling off an
estimated 3,000 such enterprises, among them small booths and shops,
service outlets, and catering facilities. Initially, preference was
given to employee buyouts, but public auctions later became the method
of choice in order to speed up the process. By September 1992, out of a
total of 855 enterprises approved for sale, 558 had been sold. Service
enterprises proved easiest to sell, although retail establishments were
not far behind.
Experimentation with large-scale privatization began in mid-1991. Two
machine-building factories, as well as the Tallinn taxi depot, were
chosen as the first properties to be sold. Preference again was given to
employee buyouts, which in the case of large-scale enterprises, however,
proved to be unwieldy because several competing groups emerged. The
experimental enterprises soon became mired in controversy, and the
policy of relying solely on local capital was abandoned. After the
adoption of the new currency in mid-1992, privatization was
reinvigorated.
In a change of procedure, the government set up the Estonian
Privatization Enterprise (Eesti Erastamisettev�te--EERE) to begin
dealing with the direct sale of large-scale enterprises to foreign and
domestic investors. The EERE was modeled after the successful German
agency Treuhandanstalt, with which the EERE signed a cooperation
agreement. In November 1992, the EERE offered its first thirty-eight
enterprises for sale through widespread advertising in local and Western
newspapers. Yet, scarcely ten days later, the newly elected prime
minister, Mart Laar, halted the process. He claimed that several
restitution claims were outstanding vis-�-vis the advertised properties
and charged that the EERE had too much power. Although the controversy
took some time to resolve, the EERE's program was back on track by 1993.
In May it offered another fifty-four enterprises for sale; in November
forty enterprises were put on the block. In each case, sealed bids were
accepted by the EERE from foreign and local investors until a certain
date. Thereafter, the EERE attempted to negotiate a sale with the
highest bidder based on development plans for the new enterprise as well
as promises to retain a certain number of employees. The early sale
offers by the EERE attracted widespread interest. In April 1993, the
Estonian parliament sweetened the incentive to bid by allowing foreign
investors to buy the land underneath any privatized property, rather
than rent. About half of the enterprises put up in the first two rounds
found buyers. Often, however, enterprises were broken up, with only
parts being sold off. Many initial sales secured guarantees of
employment for up to 60 percent of the acquired enterprise's employees.
In the summer of 1993, Estonia merged its two privatization firms,
the State Property Board and the EERE, to create the Estonian
Privatization Agency (Eesti Erastamisagentuur--EEA). The privatization
of small enterprises was coming to a close, and the process needed to be
consolidated. During 1991-92 the government sold 676 properties for a
total of EKR64.3 million. By October 1993, another 236 small enterprises
had been sold for a total of EKR169 million. Roughly 40 percent of these
were in Tallinn. A total of EKR117.8 million had been garnered from the
sale of the first thirty large-scale enterprises. According to an EEA
official, these deals had secured some EKR52 million in investment and
provided guarantees for 4,900 jobs.
By 1993 three property reform tasks remained. First, a wide variety
of mostly unprofitable state enterprises had yet to be sold off. Second,
the issue of how to provide compensation for prewar property claimants
remained unresolved. Third, the process of housing privatization, in
which the average resident was most interested, had yet to begin. These
three tasks were all addressed in a Law on Privatization passed by the
Riigikogu in June 1993. Throughout 1993 all adult residents had begun
registering themselves and their work histories to qualify for a
specific amount of national capital vouchers (rahvakapitali
obligatsioonid --RKOs) based on their years of active employment
and service to the economy. According to the new Law on Privatization,
residents could use their RKOs toward the purchase of their apartments
based on apartment values set by the government. If a resident lived in
a house or did not wish to buy an apartment, he or she could buy into
investment funds, which were to be the main players in the sale of
remaining state property. In addition, individuals could invest in
pension funds backed by the government. Finally, prewar property
claimants who were due compensation for their losses were issued
compensation securities, which they could use in any of the new
investment modes. According to Liia H�nni, a former government
minister, in 1992 the state still held about EKR36 billion worth of
property, of which EKR7 billion worth was housing stock. An estimated
EKR15 to EKR25 billion worth of RKOs would be issued, along with EKR12
to EKR15 billion in property compensation.
Estonia - Economic Sectors
Industry
The Estonian industrial sector suffered more than other sectors
during the country's transition to a market economy. Most of Estonia's
heavy industry had been developed and managed by central planners in
Moscow with imported labor from Russia. In 1990 only sixty-one of 265
industrial enterprises were under direct Estonian control. Forty
enterprises, which accounted for 12 percent of Estonia's industrial
production, were controlled directly from Moscow. Because many of these
were defense related, even Estonian authorities had limited access to
them. After independence was regained in 1991, Estonia acquired all of
the industrial enterprises on its territory and faced the challenge of
finding them a place in a market economy.
In 1990 industry accounted for about 40 percent of GDP (42.5 percent
in 1992) and 33 percent of employment. Within the sector, food
processing was the largest subsector, accounting for 30.4 percent of
production in 1992 (up from 24.5 percent in 1990). It was followed by
light industry at 17.9 percent (down from 26.3 percent in 1990) (see
table 12, Appendix).
Industrial production began to fall drastically as supplies of raw
materials from the Soviet Union dwindled. The World Bank reported that
in the first nine months of 1991, industrial activity decreased by 10
percent over the previous year's corresponding period. According to the
Estonian State Statistics Board, during 1992 total production fell
another 39 percent from 1991. In 1993, as enterprises began slowly
buying raw materials on the world market, production in some areas began
to increase. Although overall output was still down in 1993, it
increased by an estimated 7 percent in 1994. Estonia's best hope lay
with its lighter industries: food processing, textiles, furniture,
paper, and glass. Many of these relied on domestic raw materials and
hence were able to continue producing during the transition. Estonia's
metallurgical and chemical industries showed the greatest decline, and
their future was in doubt without new technology and markets.
Agriculture
Like the rest of the economy, Estonian agriculture has been in great
flux since the degeneration of the collective and state farm systems. In
1991 roughly 12 percent of the labor force was employed in agriculture,
producing 15.4 percent of Estonia's GDP. Estonia has some 1.3 million
hectares of agricultural land, nearly 1 million hectares of which are
arable. During the Soviet era, arable land decreased by nearly 405,000
hectares, much becoming forest. Collectivization in the late 1940s and
1950s brought great hardship to Estonian agriculture, which during the
first independence period had been the mainstay of Estonian society.
Still, Estonian agriculture remained more productive than the Soviet
average. In 1990 there were 221 collective and 117 state farms with an
average of 350 to 400 workers each. The average livestock herd per farm
included 1,900 cattle and 2,500 pigs. Estonia was a net exporter of meat
and milk to the other republics. Agriculture also served as the basis
for the republic's strong food-processing industry (see table 13,
Appendix). For its meat production, however, Estonia relied heavily on
feed grain from Russia. When the republic sought to cut back on meat
exports in the late 1980s, Russia retaliated by slowing the provision of
feed grain, which cut Estonian production even further. Increases in
fuel prices and a general fuel crisis in early 1992 also hit
agricultural production very hard. Although the total area of field
crops grew in the early 1990s, total production and average yields fell
markedly (see table 14, Appendix).
Reform of Estonia's agricultural system began in December 1989 with
adoption of the Law on Private Farming. The law allowed individuals to
take up to fifty hectares of land for private planting and for growing
crops. The land was heritable but could not be bought or sold. The goal
of the reform was to stimulate production and return the spirit of
private farming to a countryside worn down by decades of central
planning. Six months after implementation, nearly 2,000 farms were set
up, with several thousand waiting for approval. A year later, more than
3,500 private farms were operating. Starting in October 1991, farmers
were allowed to own their land. This boosted the number of farms to
7,200 by early 1992. As of the first half of 1993, a total of 8,781
farms had been created, covering approximately 225,000 hectares, or a
quarter of Estonia's arable land.
In May 1993, the Estonian parliament passed a law on property taxes,
which had been a major concern for many farmers before getting into
business. The law mandated a 0.5 percent tax on property values to be
paid to the state and a 0.3 to 0.7 percent share to be paid to local
governments. More than property taxes, the costs of commodities such as
fuel and new equipment were considered most likely to prove burdensome
to many new farmers.
With the introduction of private agriculture, many collective farms
began to disintegrate. Corruption and "spontaneous
privatization" of farm equipment by farm directors grew. A number
of Estonia's more successful farms were reorganized into cooperatives.
Over the long term, the government predicted that 40,000 to 60,000
private farms averaging fifty hectares would be optimal. At the same
time, Estonians were likely to maintain a very high rate of consumption
of home-grown fruits and vegetables. A 1993 survey by the Estonian State
Statistics Board indicated that nearly 80 percent of all potatoes
consumed by Estonians either were privately grown or were received from
friends or relatives. Thirty percent of eggs were received outside the
market as well as 71.5 percent of all juice. Overall, Estonians reported
getting over 20 percent of their food from private production or from
friends or relatives.
Estonia has 1.8 million hectares of forest with approximately 274
million cubic meters of timber. Accounting for about 9 percent of
industrial production in 1992, forest-related industries seem likely to
grow further in the 1990s, thanks to expanding furniture and timber
exports.
The fishing industry, once entirely under Soviet control, also has
the potential to contribute to the country's economy. With 230 ships,
including ninety oceangoing vessels, this profitable industry operated
widely in international waters. A large share of Estonia's food-industry
exports consists of fish and fish products. In 1992 about 131,000 tons
of live fish were caught.
Energy and Natural Resources
Estonia is an exporter of electrical energy, but it is wholly
dependent on the outside market for oil fuels and natural gas. Oil shale
deposits estimated at 5 billion tons in the country's northeast help to
fuel two large thermal power plants near the town of Narva (see fig. 5).
Roughly 23 million tons of oil shale were mined per year up to the early
1990s. In 1990 Estonia produced about 17.2 billion kilowatt-hours of
electricity, of which about 8.5 billion were exported to Russia and
Latvia. By 1992, however, export production of electricity had dropped
by more than one-half because of falling demand in Russia. These
cutbacks in turn forced a slowdown in oil-shale mining, although no
exact figures were available. In many mines, miners were employed only
three or four days per week. The decline in tonnage also increased
relative production costs. In order to start bringing Estonian oil shale
closer to world prices and to cover costs, mining officials called in
1993 for an increase in the state price per ton from EKR36 to EKR50. The
government resisted at first, fearing a corresponding rise in
electricity prices and a new wave of inflation throughout the economy
but eventually allowed oil shale producers to raise the price of their
products to EKR45 per ton.
After independence, Estonia endeavored to sign barter agreements with
Russia to exchange Estonian electricity and food for Russian oil and
gas. Transportation problems in Russia caused this arrangement to break
down in early 1992. The ensuing fuel shortages forced Estonia to venture
onto the open market for the first time. In the interim, Russian oil
prices began to approach the world price, meaning Estonia would find it
just as competitive to begin buying fuel from other countries. In March
1993, two new oil terminals were opened near Tallinn, which will
facilitate imports in the future. Foreign companies, such as Finland's
Neste and Norway's Statoil, also began entering the Estonian gasoline
market, building several modern filling stations in Tallinn and the
surrounding areas. Meanwhile, the Estonian state oil company, Eesti K�tus,
was forced to sell off many of its holdings and drastically scale back
its operations in mid-1993 in order to pay an estimated EKR250 million
in debts and back taxes. The company's market share was expected to drop
from 70 percent to 30 percent.
Dependence on Russia for natural gas continued, with Estonia
consuming about 1.3 billion cubic meters of Russian natural gas in 1990.
Energy was in fact often used as a political weapon during the early
1990s. Estonia's two thermal power plants, for example, were staffed
mostly by Russian workers who, to protest Estonian government policies,
repeatedly threatened to shut down the plants. Although any disruption
in production would also affect neighboring Russia, the possibility of
problems persisted. Russia in turn threatened Estonia with a cutoff of
gas supplies in June 1993 during the crisis surrounding Estonia's Law on
Aliens (see Government and Politics, this ch.). The Russian gas company
Lentransgas once shut down its pipelines to Estonia for a single day,
ostensibly because of Estonia's US$10 million in unpaid bills. Also,
Russian leaders often threatened economic sanctions for what they called
discrimination against Estonia's Russian minority.
Transportation and Telecommunications
Estonia had a total of 30,300 kilometers of public roads (29,200
kilometers hard-surfaced and 1,100 kilometers un-paved) in the early
1990s. These was little traffic congestion, thanks to the relatively low
number of automobiles per person--140 per 1,000 inhabitants. Estonia's
major roads include Highway M11 to St. Petersburg and Highway M12 to
Riga. In 1990 the roads carried 214 million tons of freight, or 85
percent of the total freight for that year. Estonian officials, for
their part, were seeking to increase international truck transport
through the country by encouraging the development of an international
highway project, Via Baltica, from Tallinn to Warsaw (see fig. 6).
Bus transportation was widely developed during the Soviet period,
totaling 4.5 billion passenger-kilometers in 1990. By 1993 the removal
of state subsidies had forced an increase in ticket prices, a decline in
ridership, and a contraction of service. New international routes,
however, were opened to Germany and Denmark.
With a total of 1,126 kilometers of track, railroads in Estonia
carried 30 million tons of freight and 16 million passengers in 1993.
Estonia's main rail lines link Tallinn with Narva and St. Petersburg,
Tartu with the Russian city of Pskov, and P�rnu with Riga. More than
130 kilometers of rail line are electrified.
The country's main airport, located in Tallinn, can serve
medium-sized jets and accommodate up to 2 million passengers per year.
Airports are also located in Tartu and P�rnu at former Russian air
force bases. Domestic air service is provided only to Estonia's islands.
In September 1991, the country inherited a fleet of about fifteen
airplanes from the Soviet airline Aeroflot. It had a fleet of sixteen
aircraft in 1992. A state airline, Estonian Air, was launched in
December. In 1992 it served twelve international
destinations--Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Frankfurt, Helsinki, Kiev, Minsk,
Moscow, Riga, St. Petersburg, Sochi (Russia), <"http://worldfacts.us/Sweden-Stockholm.htm">Stockholm
, and
Vilnius--and carried nearly 175,000 passengers. Service is also provided
by other airlines, including Aeroflot, Drakk Air Lines, Finnair,
Lithuanian Airlines, SAS (Scandinavian Airlines), and Lufthansa.
International shipping was a major source of foreign currency for
Estonia under the Soviet regime. In the early 1990s, the state-owned
Estonian Shipping Company operated a fleet of eighty-two vessels with a
carrying capacity of 500,000 tons. Narva is the main inland port. Five
hundred kilometers of inland waterways are navigable year round.
Estonia's three main commercial ports are all located around Tallinn;
together they handled about 10 million tons of cargo in 1991. The
Tallinn port continued to be a transit point for trade shipments to
Russia, particularly grain. Ferry traffic out of Tallinn grew
exponentially in the early 1990s. In 1992 an estimated 1.3 million
people crossed between Tallinn and Helsinki, while traffic was said to
be still growing at 50 to 60 percent a year. In 1990 overnight ferry
service was started to Stockholm; freight service to Germany followed
later. Disaster struck on September 28, 1994, however, when a ferry
owned by Estline, a Swedish-Estonian joint venture, sank in the Baltic
Sea, killing more than 900 passengers.
Telecommunications required much modernization in Estonia after
independence. Poor-quality telephone connections and outmoded equipment
were among the major problems. The number of international lines was
increased during the early 1990s, and beginning in 1993 new digital
switchboards were being installed to replace old mechanical ones. The
country's first mobile telephone networks were set up in 1990.
Esttelecom, the state telecommunications company, had approx-imately
341,000 subscribers in 1992. However, unmet demand because of a shortage
of lines indicated the existence of another 150,000 potential customers.
Only two-thirds of telephone customers had long-distance access within
Estonia and to the former Soviet Union. To improve service, Esttelecom
was negotiating with Swedtel of Sweden for outside investment and the
creation of a joint telecommunications venture. In 1993 there were
approximately 600,000 television receivers in use, or one television per
2.6 persons. There was one radio per 1.7 persons and one telephone per
3.9 persons.
Tourism was a major area of growth for Estonia in the late 1980s and
even more so after independence. With the expansion of ferry and air
links, Estonia began to receive a growing number of visitors from
Western countries as the number of tourists from the former Soviet Union
dropped off. In 1990 the number of tourists was estimated at 500,000; by
the mid-1990s, that figure was expected to top 1 million. New
accommodations were being built, and several of Tallinn's major hotels
were being privatized. Estonia established visa requirements for
visitors after independence but soon rescinded them for many European
countries, the United States, and Canada. The Baltic states also signed
agreements allowing foreigners to travel with one country's visa in all
three states. Tallinn's medieval old town, although in need of repairs,
is Estonia's main tourist attraction. Many visitors also tour Tartu and
the island of Saaremaa. The greatest number of visitors come from
Finland and Sweden. Net tourism receipts totaled about EKR26 million in
1992.
Estonia's new era of democratic politics began slowly in the 1990s
with the adoption of a new constitution and the formation of stable
political groupings. Several mechanisms in the constitution were
beginning to function to ensure a balance of power and steady
government. Citizenship issues, however, caused tensions among the
country's 500,000-strong Russophone population, most of whom had been
denied automatic citizenship rights in 1991. Their naturalization and
integration into Estonian society remained a significant challenge.
The election in September 1992 of a new parliament, the Riigikogu,
and the formal restoration of the Republic of Estonia marked the opening
of a new political era. Not only was a new set of deputies elected, but
Estonia took a further step in defining its political forces and
developing a new political culture. As expected, right-wing parties did
best in the electoral poll, promising "to clean house" and
offer a fresh beginning after the Soviet era. The contest for the
101-seat Riigikogu yielded a three-party center-right coalition
government holding fifty-two seats. The Fatherland Party (Isamaa) led
the coalition with thirty seats, the Estonian National Independence
Party (Eesti Rahvusliku S�ltumatuse Partei) had ten seats, and the
Moderates (M��dukad--made up of the Social Democratic Party and the
Rural Center Party) had twelve seats. In opposition were the Coalition
Party (Koonderakond), the Rural Union (Maaliit), the Estonian Center
Party (Eesti Keskerakond), the Royalist Party (Rojalistlik Partei), and
the Estonian Citizens Union (Eesti Kodanike Liit). Because noncitizens
were not allowed to vote in the election, most of Estonia's Russian
population was excluded from the poll. Consequently, the new Riigikogu
was 100 percent ethnic Estonian.
The 1992 elections also saw a special contest for the largely
ceremonial post of president. Although the new constitution stipulates
that the president shall be elected by the parliament, the
Constitutional Assembly in early 1992 succumbed to popular pressure and
agreed to have the country's first president elected by the people. In
the resulting poll, the incumbent chairman of the parliament, Arnold R��tel,
topped the list. But with only 41.8 percent of the vote, he did not
muster the majority needed for direct election under the special rules.
Although a former communist, R��tel had been widely admired for his
steady, balanced leadership during the independence struggle. Yet, his
electoral shortfall was enough to throw the final decision into the
Riigikogu, where the runner-up, with 29.5 percent, Isamaa candidate and
former foreign minister Lennart Meri, had the advantage. At the
parliament's opening session on October 5, Meri defeated R��tel by a
vote of fifty-nine to thirty-one.
In mid-October Mart Laar, the thirty-two-year-old chairman of Isamaa,
was appointed prime minister by President Meri. The youngest person ever
to hold that post, Laar promised immediately to expand Estonia's
free-market reforms and defend Estonian national interests. During his
first fourteen months in office, Laar cut tax rates and maintained
control over expenditures (see Economy, this ch.). He also posted some
foreign policy successes, such as Estonia's admission to the Council of
Europe (see Glossary) in May 1993. His cabinet, however, was plagued by
inexperience. Four months into office, Laar's choice for economy
minister resigned after accusations that he was not up to the job. In
January 1993, the defense minister, an �migr� Estonian, Hain Rebas,
caused a scandal when he allowed some 250 Russian soldiers to enter
Estonia just as the country was negotiating their withdrawal with
President Yeltsin. In August a mutiny by a handful of Estonian soldiers
in western Estonia prompted Rebas to resign altogether. In December
1993, President Meri was obliged to dismiss Minister of Interior Lagle
Parek, a longtime dissident during Soviet rule, for several scandals
involving her management of ministerial affairs (see National Security,
this ch.).
In June 1993, Laar's government suffered its greatest turmoil when a
major political crisis erupted over passage of a law meant to regulate
the status of noncitizens (mostly Russians) in the country. Russian
groups criticized the 1993 Law on Aliens as discriminatory, and for the
first time some of Estonia's key Western allies, including the United
States, the Scandinavian states, and the European Union, raised
objections. The Law on Aliens as originally adopted would have required
all noncitizens to reapply for residency permits within two years
without any guarantee of acceptance. In July, after President Meri
vetoed the law and requested a review of it from the Council of Europe
and the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE--see
Glossary), the Riigikogu agreed to amend the measure and guarantee most
noncitizens new permits. The domestic crisis prompted President Meri to
establish the Nationalities Roundtable for future discussion of minority
affairs. The United States and Sweden immediately supported the
roundtable with financial contributions to cover its operating costs. In
the ensuing months, the roundtable met several times, but no major
decisions were reached.
The results of Estonia's first post-Soviet local elections, held in
October 1993, reflected public reaction to the government's series of
setbacks and the continuing hardships caused by economic reform. In all
the major cities, Isamaa did poorly. Former prime minister Tiit V�hi's
Coalition Party was the big winner, especially in Tallinn, where it won
eighteen of sixty-four seats. Russian parties also reemerged on the
political scene, supported mostly by noncitizen voters, who, under a
special constitutional provision, were allowed to vote. In Tallinn the
moderate Russian Democratic Movement won eighteen seats. Despite this
midterm upset and a continuing decline in public opinion polls, the Laar
government later easily survived a vote of no confidence in parliament.
In December it succeeded in passing a tax cut as well as a budget for
1994. To shore up the Isamaa-led coalition, in January 1994 four key
portfolios in the Council of Ministers (defense, economy, finance, and
foreign affairs) were reshuffled. However, the coalition disintegrated
in June 1994 after a series of embarrassments, most notably the
allegation that the prime minister had been involved in the secret
transfer of a large sum of Russian rubles to the breakaway Russian
republic of Chechnya in 1992. In September 1994, Laar lost a vote of no
confidence in the Riigikogu. After President Meri's nomination of Bank
of Estonia president Siim Kallas to succeed Laar was rejected, the
Riigikogu confirmed Andres Tarand, the outgoing minister of environment,
as prime minister in October. Tarand was to serve as a caretaker until
the general elections in March 1995.
Estonia - The Constitution
Ant, J�ri, et al., eds. Ot dogovora o bazakh do anneksii:
Dokumenty i materialy. Tallinn: Perioodika, 1991.
Arjakas, K�llo, et al., eds. Ot pakta Molotova-Ribbentropa do
dogovora o bazakh: Dokumenty i materialy. Tallinn: Perioodika,
1989.
Baltic States: A Reference Book. Tallinn: Estonian
Encyclopedia, 1991.
Clemens, Walter C. Baltic Independence and Russian Empire.
New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991.
Crowe, David. The Baltic States and the Great Powers.
Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1993.
Economist Intelligence Unit. Country Report: Baltic Republics:
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania [London], No. 1, 1994.
Economist Intelligence Unit. Country Report: Baltic Republics:
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania [London], No. 4, 1994.
Eesti NSV Loominguliste Liitude Juhatuste �hispleenum, 1-2.
aprillil 1988. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, 1988.
Ehrlich, R., and L. Luup, eds. Invest in the Future: The Future
Is Estonia. Tallinn: Informare, 1993.
Estonia. Eesti Vabariigi Riiklik Statistikaamet. Statistika
Aastaraamat, 1991. Tallinn: 1991.
Estonia. Estonian State Statistics Board. 1993 Statistical
Yearbook. Tallinn: 1993.
The Europa World Year Book, 1994. London: Europa, 1994.
Fitzmaurice, John. The Baltics: A Regional Future? New York:
St. Martin's Press, 1992.
Forgus, Silvia. "Soviet Subversive Activities in Independent
Estonia (1918-1940)," Journal of Baltic Studies, 23, No.
1, Spring 1992, 29-46.
Frydman, Roman, Andrzej Rapaczynski, John S. Earle, et al., eds. The
Privatization Process in Russia, Ukraine, and the Baltic States.
New York: Central European University Press, 1993.
Girnius, Saulius. "The Economies of the Baltic States in
1993," RFE/RL Research Report [Munich], 3, No. 20, May 20,
1994, 1-14.
Hiden, John, and Patrick Salmon. The Baltic Nations and Europe:
Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania in the Twentieth Century. New York:
Longman, 1991.
H�yer, Svennik, Epp Lauk, and Peeter Vihalemm, eds. Towards a
Civic Society: The Baltic Media's Long Road to Freedom; Perspectives on
History, Ethnicity, and Journalism. Tartu: Nota Baltic, 1993.
Invest in Estonia. Tallinn: Inorek Marketing, 1992.
Joenniemi, Pertti, and Peeter Vares, eds. New Actors on the
International Arena: The Foreign Policies of the Baltic Countries.
Tampere, Finland: Tampere Research Institute, 1993.
J�este, Marje, �lo Kaevats, and Harry �iglane, eds. Eesti A
& �. Tallinn: Eesti Ents�klopeediakirjastus, 1993.
Kala, Kulno. "Eesti rahvuslikust koosseisust p�rast Teist
Maailmas�da," Akadeemia [Tartu], 4, No. 3, 1992, 508-35.
Kaplan, Cynthia. "Estonia: A Plural Society on the Way to
Independence." Pages 206-21 in Ian Bremmer and Ray Taras, eds., Nations
and Politics in the Soviet Successor States. New York: Cambridge
University Press, 1993.
Karu, �lo. Kes on kes Eesti poliitikas, 1988-1992. Tallinn:
Eesti Ents�klopeediakirjastus, 1992.
Kasekamp, Andres. "The Estonian Veterans' League: A Fascist
Movement?" Journal of Baltic Studies, 24, No. 3, Fall
1993, 263-68.
Kelder, Jaan, and Indrek Mustimets. Keda me valisime? Tartu:
Tartumaa, 1993.
Kionka, Riina. "The Estonian Citizens' Committee: An Opposition
Movement of a Different Complexion," Report on the USSR
[Munich], 2, No. 6, 1990, 30-33.
Kirch, Aksel, Marika Kirch, and Tarmo Tuisk. "Russians in the
Baltic States: To Be or Not to Be?" Journal of Baltic Studies,
24, No. 2, Summer 1993, 173-88.
Kiris, Advig, ed. Restoration of the Independence of the Republic
of Estonia: Selection of Legal Acts. Tallinn: Estonian Institute
for Information, 1991.
Kivirahk, Juhan, Rain Rosimannus, and Indrek Pajumaa. "The
Premises for Democracy: A Study of Political Values in Post-Independent
Estonia," Journal of Baltic Studies, 24, No. 2, Summer
1993, 149-60.
Kuddo, Arvo. "Rahva eluj�rjest," Postimees
[Tartu], July 30-31, 1993.
Lieven, Anatol. The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania
and the Path to Independence. New Haven: Yale University Press,
1993.
The Military Balance, 1994-1995. London: International
Institute for Strategic Studies, 1994.
Misiunas, Romuald J., and Rein Taagepera. The Baltic States:
Years of Dependence, 1940-1991. Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1991.
Narodnyi Kongress: Sbornik materialov kongressa Norodnogo Fronta
Estonii, 1-2 oktiabria 1988 g. Tallinn: Perioodika, 1989.
�ispuu, Silvia, et al. Eesti ajalugu �rkamisajast t�nap�evani.
Tallinn: Koolibri, 1992.
Parming, T�nu. The Collapse of Liberal Democracy and the Rise of
Authoritarianism in Estonia. London: Sage, 1975.
Pettai, Vello A. "Estonia: Old Maps and New Roads," Journal
of Democracy, 4, No. 1, January 1993, 117-25.
Pillau, Endel, ed. Eestimaa kuumsuvi 1988. Tallinn: Olion,
1989.
Raidla, Peter. Liidu k�tkeis on raske vabaneda: Poliitikakuud
aastail 1987-1991. Tallinn: Rekrea, 1991.
Rauch, Georg von. The Baltic States: The Years of Independence,
1917-1940. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.
Raun, Toivo V. Estonia and the Estonians. 1st ed. Stanford,
California: Hoover Institution Press, 1987.
Raun, Toivo V. Estonia and the Estonians. 2d ed. Stanford,
California: Hoover Institution Press, 1991.
Raun, Toivo V. "The Re-establishment of Estonian
Independence," Journal of Baltic Studies, 22, No. 3, Fall
1991, 251-58.
Read, Anthony, and David Fisher. The Deadly Embrace. New
York: Norton, 1988.
Smith, Graham. The Baltic States: The National Self-Determination
of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. New York: St. Martin's Press,
1994.
Sootla, Georg, and Margus Maiste. T�htaasta 1988. Tallinn:
Eesti Raamat, 1989.
The Stateman's Year-Book,1994-95. Ed., Brian Hunter. New
York: St. Martin's Press, 1994.
Taagepera, Rein. Estonia: Return to Independence. Boulder,
Colorado: Westview Press, 1993.
Taagepera, Rein. "Ethnic Relations in Estonia," Journal
of Baltic Studies, 23, No. 2, Summer 1992, 121-32.
Titma, Mikk. Chto u nas proiskhodit? Tallinn: Perioodika,
1989.
United States. Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook,
1994. Washington: GPO, 1994.
World Bank. Estonia: The Transition to a Market Economy.
Washington: 1993.
CITATION: Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. The Country Studies Series. Published 1988-1999.
Please note: This text comes from the Country Studies Program, formerly the Army Area Handbook Program. The Country Studies Series presents a description and analysis of the historical setting and the social, economic, political, and national security systems and institutions of countries throughout the world.
TRY USING CTRL-F on your keyboard to find the appropriate section of text