Early History
Estonia's struggles for independence during the twentieth century
were in large part a reaction to nearly 700 years of foreign rule.
Before 1200 the Estonians lived largely as free peasants loosely
organized into parishes (kihelkonnad ), which in turn were
grouped into counties (maakonnad ). In the early 1200s, the
Estonians and the Latvians came under assault from German crusaders
seeking to impose Christianity on them. Although the Estonians'
resistance to the Teutonic Knights lasted some twenty years, the lack of
a centralized political organization as well as inferior weaponry
eventually brought down the Estonians in 1227. The Germans, moving from
the south, were abetted by Danish forces that invaded from the north and
captured Tallinn. Together with present-day Latvia, the region became
known as Livonia; the Germans and Danes settled down as nobility, and
the Estonians were progressively subordinated as serfs. During 1343-45
an Estonian peasant uprising against the German and Danish nobility
prompted the Danes to relinquish their control of northern Estonia to
the Germans. After this resistance was crushed, the area remained
generally peaceful for two centuries.
Commerce developed rapidly because Estonia's larger urban centers at
the time--Tallinn, Tartu, P�rnu, and Narva--were all members of the
Hanseatic League, an organization established by merchants of various,
mostly German, cities to protect their mutual trading interests. Still,
foreign rivalries over the strategic Livonian region began to reemerge
in the mid-sixteenth century as the fighting capacity of the Germans
diminished and that of neighboring Muscovy began to increase. The
ensuing twenty-five-year struggle for control of Livonia was
precipitated by an invasion by Ivan IV (the Terrible) (r. 1533-84) in
1558. The advancing Russians wiped out the disintegrating forces of the
Teutonic Knights and nearly succeeded in conquering the whole area.
However, Swedish and Polish intervention reversed the Russian gains and
forced Ivan eastward, back behind Lake Peipsi. Peace between Sweden and
Poland in Livonia was also slow in coming, with Sweden eventually
winning most of the territory by 1629. By this time, decades of war had
caused huge population losses (in some areas, over 50 percent),
affecting urban and rural areas alike.
Under Swedish rule, northern Estonia was incorporated into the Duchy
of Estland. The southern part, together with northern Latvia, became
known as Livland. This division of Estonian lands would last until 1917.
The German-based nobility in both areas retained and even strengthened
its position under Swedish suzerainty. Meanwhile, the Estonian peasants
saw their lot worsen as more and more of their land and output were
appropriated by seigniorial estates. Still, during the Swedish era,
Estonian education got its start with the founding of Tartu University
in 1632 and the establishment of the first Estonian parish schools in
the 1680s. Although the population also began to grow during this period
of peace, war and suffering once again were not far away. Swedish
hegemony during the late seventeenth century had become overextended,
making the Swedes' holdings a prime target for a newly expansionist
Russia.
In his first attempt to conquer Estland and Livland, during the Great
Northern War (1700-09), Peter I (the Great) (r. 1682-1725) met with
defeat at Narva at the hands of Sweden's Charles XII (r. 1697-1718). A
second campaign in 1708 saw Peter introduce a scorched-earth policy
across many parts of the area. The outcome was victory for Russia in
1710 and acquisition of a "window to the West." In taking
control of Estland and Livland for what would be the next 200 years,
tsarist Russia recognized the rights and privileges of the local German
nobility, whose members amounted to only a small fraction of the
population. Although the extent of the nobles' autonomy in the two areas
was always contested, especially under Catherine II (the Great) (r.
1762-96), the Baltic Germans did develop a strong loyalty to the Russian
tsars as guarantors of their landed privileges. German control over the
Estonian peasantry reached its high point during the eighteenth century.
Labor overtook taxes-in-kind as the predominant means of controlling the
serfs. The first real reforms of serfdom, which gave peasants some
rights, took place in 1804. In 1816 and 1819, the serfs were formally
emancipated in Estland and Livland, respectively.
By the mid-nineteenth century, the Estonians were fast developing
into an independent society and nation. The number of urbanized
Estonians had grown considerably, overtaking what had been German
majorities in the cities. Industrialization was also breaking down the
old order. An Estonian cultural awakening began in the 1850s and 1860s
(see Religion; Language and Culture, this ch.). Tsarist reaction and a
fierce Russification campaign in the 1880s could not extinguish the new
Estonian spirit, although for the most part Estonian demands continued
to focus on culture. Political demands for Estonian autonomy found
strong expression during the Revolution of 1905, and an All-Estonian
Congress was organized in Tartu that same year. Although radical
Estonian politicians such as Jaan Teemant and moderate leaders such as
Jaan T�nisson were deeply divided on tactics, there were widespread
calls from the Estland and Livland provinces for a unification of
Estonian lands and an official end to Russification. Repression of the
1905 movement was severe in Estland, although T�nisson's moderate
Estonian Progressive People's Party survived and went on to participate
in Russia's new assembly, the Duma. Amid the turmoil, Baltic Germans
also grew apprehensive; they would be upset even more with the outbreak
of World War I, which would pit Russia against their conationals.
The fall of the tsarist regime in February 1917 forced the issue of
Estonia's political future. Vigorous lobbying in Petrograd by T�nisson
and the large Estonian population living there forced the provisional
government to accept Estonia's territorial unification as one province
and the election of a provincial assembly, the Maap�ev, later that
year. The election results showed significant support for leftist
parties, including the Bolsheviks, Social Democrats, and Social
Revolutionaries. Voting was complicated, however, by the presence of
numerous military personnel from outside Estonia.
The Bolshevik takeover in Petrograd in November 1917 extended to
Estonia as well, until Germany occupied Estonia in February 1918. Most
of Estonia's other political parties realized they were caught between
the two forces and agreed to begin an active search for outside support.
Representatives were sent to the major European capitals to secure
Western recognition of an Estonian declaration of independence. As the
Bolsheviks retreated from Tallinn and the German occupation army entered
the city, the Committee of Elders (or standing body) of the Maap�ev
declared the country independent on February 24, 1918.
Estonia - Interwar Independence, 1918-40
In contrast to its later peaceful return to independence in 1991,
Estonia's first modern era of sovereignty began with a fifteen-month war
(1918-20) against both Russian Bolshevik and Baltic German forces. In
the end, the War of Independence took the lives of about 3,600 Estonians
and left about 14,000 wounded. In the Tartu Peace Treaty, which was
concluded with Russia in February 1920, Moscow relinquished all claims
to Estonia in perpetuity. A year later, Estonia gained international
recognition from the Western powers and became a member of the League of
Nations. In June 1920, Estonia's first constitution was promulgated,
establishing a parliamentary system.
With a political system in place, the new Estonian government
immediately began the job of rebuilding. As one of its first major acts,
the government carried out an extensive land reform, giving tracts to
small farmers and veterans of the War of Independence. The large estates
of the Baltic German nobility were expropriated, breaking its
centuries-old power as a class.
Agriculture dominated the country's economy. Thanks to land reform,
the number of small farms doubled to more than 125,000. Although many
homesteads were small, the expansion of landownership helped stimulate
new production after the war. Land reform, however, did not solve all of
Estonia's early problems. Estonian agriculture and industry (mostly
textiles and machine manufacturing) had depended heavily on the Russian
market. Independence and Soviet communism closed that outlet by 1924,
and the economy had to reorient itself quickly toward the West, to which
the country also owed significant war debts. The economy began to grow
again by the late 1920s but suffered another setback during the Great
Depression, which hit Estonia during 1931-34. By the late 1930s,
however, the industrial sector was expanding anew, at an average annual
rate of 14 percent. Industry employed some 38,000 workers by 1938.
Independent Estonia's early political system was characterized by
instability and frequent government turnovers. The political parties
were fragmented and were about evenly divided between the left and right
wings. The first Estonian constitution required parliamentary approval
of all major acts taken by the prime minister and his government. The
Riigikogu (State Assembly) could dismiss the government at any time,
without incurring sanctions. Consequently, from 1918 to 1933 a total of
twenty-three governments held office.
The country's first big political challenge came in 1924 during an
attempted communist takeover. In the depths of a nationwide economic
crisis, leaders of the Estonian Communist Party (Eestimaa Kommunistlik
Partei--EKP), in close contact with Communist International
(Comintern--see Glossary) leaders from Moscow, believed the time was
ripe for a workers' revolution to mirror that of the Soviet Union. On
the morning of December 1, some 300 party activists moved to take over
key government outposts in Tallinn, while expecting workers in the
capital to rise up behind them. The effort soon failed, however, and the
government quickly regained control. In the aftermath, Estonian
political unity got a strong boost, while the communists lost all
credibility. Relations with the Soviet Union, which had helped to
instigate the coup, deteriorated sharply.
By the early 1930s, Estonia's political system, still governed by the
imbalanced constitution, again began to show signs of instability. As in
many other European countries at the time, pressure was mounting for a
stronger system of government. Several constitutional changes were
proposed, the most radical being put forth by the protofascist League of
Independence War Veterans. In a 1933 referendum, the league spearheaded
replacement of the parliamentary system with a presidential form of
government and laid the groundwork for an April 1934 presidential
election, which it expected to win. Alarmed by the prospect of a league
victory and possible fascist rule, the caretaker prime minister,
Konstantin P�ts, organized a pre-emptive coup d'�tat on March 12,
1934. In concert with the army, P�ts began a rule by decree that
endured virtually without interruption until 1940. He suspended the
parliament and all political parties, and he disbanded the League of
Independence War Veterans, arresting several hundred of its leaders. The
subsequent "Era of Silence" initially was supported by most of
Estonian political society. After the threat from the league was
neutralized, however, calls for a return to parliamentary democracy
resurfaced. In 1936 P�ts initiated a tentative liberalization with the
election of a constituent assembly and the adoption of a new
constitution. During elections for a new parliament, however, political
parties remained suspended, except for P�ts's own National Front, and
civil liberties were only slowly restored. P�ts was elected president
by the new parliament in 1938.
Estonia - The Soviet Era, 1940-85
Although the period of authoritarian rule that lasted from 1934 to
1940 was a low point in Estonian democracy, in perspective its severity
clearly would be tempered by the long Soviet era soon to follow. The
clouds over Estonia and its independence began to gather in August 1939,
when Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Nazi-Soviet
Nonaggression Pact (also known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact), dividing
Eastern Europe into spheres of influence. Moving to capitalize on its
side of the deal, the Soviet Union soon began to pressure Estonia,
Latvia, and Lithuania into signing the Pact of Defense and Mutual
Assistance, which would allow Moscow to station 25,000 troops in
Estonia. President P�ts, in weakening health and with little outside
support, acceded to every Soviet demand. In June 1940, Soviet forces
completely occupied the country, alleging that Estonia had
"violated" the terms of the mutual assistance treaty. With
rapid political maneuvering, the regime of Soviet leader Joseph V.
Stalin then forced the installation of a pro-Soviet government and
called for new parliamentary elections in July. The Estonian Communist
Party, which had only recently reemerged from underground with fewer
than 150 members, organized the sole list of candidates permitted to
run. P�ts and other Estonian political leaders meanwhile were quietly
deported to the Soviet Union or killed. With the country occupied and
under total control, the communists' "official" electoral
victory on June 17-18 with 92.8 percent of the vote was merely window
dressing. On July 21, the new parliament declared Estonia a Soviet
republic and "requested" admission into the Soviet Union. In
Moscow, the Supreme Soviet granted the request on August 6, 1940.
For all the ups and downs Estonia's independent government
experienced during the interwar period, its termination by Stalin in
1940 was clearly not among the range of solutions favored by most
Estonians. Yet, chances of holding off the Soviet onslaught with an army
numbering about 15,000 men were slim at best. Thus, Estonia's only real
hope for the future lay in continued Western recognition of its de jure
statehood, which other European countries and the United States declared
in 1940. Over the next fifty years, this Western policy of token
recognition nearly fell into desuetude. Yet, the policy's survival into
the late 1980s would allow it to become a rallying point for Estonia's
new drive for independence. Thanks to this continuing Western
recognition, Estonia's calls for sovereignty from Moscow by early 1990
could not be considered merely secessionism. Rather, they represented
demands for the restoration of a state still existent under
international law. This appeal to international legality dating to 1940
would frustrate the attempts of Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev to
control Estonia and the other Baltic states in the late 1980s.
Estonia's absorption into the Soviet Union as the Estonian Soviet
Socialist Republic was interrupted in June 1941 by the German invasion.
Still, that one year of Soviet rule left a deep mark on the Estonians.
In addition to the takeover of their country and the rapid
nationalization of their capitalist economy, on June 13-14, 1941, before
the German invasion, Estonians also saw the mass deportation of some
10,000 of their countrymen to Siberia. Of those seized during the
one-night operation, over 80 percent were women, children, or elderly
people. The purpose of this action seemed to be to create terror rather
than to neutralize any actual threat to the regime. The 1941-44 German
occupation witnessed more repression, especially of Estonia's Jewish
population, which numbered about 2,000. In September 1944, as the Red
Army again neared Estonia, the memories of Soviet rule resurfaced
vividly enough to prompt some 70,000 Estonians to flee the country into
exile. These �migr�s later formed ethnic communities in Sweden, the
United States, Canada, Britain, Australia, and elsewhere, continuing to
lobby for Estonia's rights during the next fifty years. Altogether, from
1939 to 1945 Estonia lost over 20 percent of its population to the
turmoil of Soviet and German expansionism.
After the war, the Sovietization of Estonia resumed. The republic's
war-ravaged industry was rebuilt as a component of the centrally planned
economy. Agricultural collectivization was enforced, climaxing in March
1949 with another, more brutal wave of deportations involving some
25,000 people. The Estonian Communist Party was purged in 1950 of many
of its original native leaders; they were replaced by several prominent
Russified Estonians who had grown up in Russia. After Stalin's death in
1953, Nikita S. Khrushchev's liberalization also touched Estonia.
Efforts at economic reform were undertaken, and repression was eased. By
the late 1960s, consumerism had taken root, and intellectual life was
relatively vibrant. Following the Soviet Union's suppression of
Czechoslovakia's "Prague Spring" reform movement in 1968, the
trend toward openness suffered a reversal, but Estonia continued to
maintain a standard of living well above the Soviet average. In 1980,
during the period of stagnation under Soviet leader Leonid I. Brezhnev,
some 2,000 schoolchildren demonstrated in the streets of Tallinn against
a major Russification campaign launched from Moscow. Several dozen
Estonian intellectuals later came together to write their own protest
letter, but to no avail. Karl Vaino, the Russified Estonian leader of
the Estonian Communist Party at the time, was particularly hostile
toward dissent of any kind.
Estonia - The Pursuit of Independence, 1985-91
The dawning of glasnost (see Glossary) and perestroika
(see Glossary) in the Soviet Union initiated a period of liberalization
from which the dying superpower would never recover. Estonia seized on
this opportunity in 1987, beginning with public protests against a
phosphorus-mining project proposed by the central government that would
have seriously damaged the country's environment. Pressure for economic
reform became acute later in the year when a group of four Estonian
liberals put forth a plan for economic autonomy for the republic. In
1988 Estonia's "singing revolution" took off, energized by the
removal of Karl Vaino as Estonian Communist Party chief in June and his
replacement by a native son, Vaino V�ljas. In April the Estonian
Popular Front was founded as the capstone to a summer of political
activity unparalleled since 1940. This mobilization proved effective in
November when Estonia opposed attempts by Gorbachev to strengthen
central authority through changes in the Soviet Union's constitution. In
an act of defiance, the Estonian parliament, then known as the Supreme
Soviet, declared the republic's right to sovereignty on November 16. It
also called for a new union treaty to be drawn up to govern the Soviet
state.
By the spring of 1989, Estonia had thrown down the gauntlets of
political sovereignty and economic autonomy. A two-year effort to force
their acceptance by Moscow followed. On the political front, Estonia's
strongest strategy was to invoke history. At the Soviet Union's first
Congress of People's Deputies (see Glossary) in Moscow, in 1989,
Estonian and other Baltic deputies battled with Gorbachev to have the
Soviet Union reveal the true story of the Nazi-Soviet Nonaggression Pact
in time for the fiftieth anniversary of the pact in August. Just days
before the anniversary, a commission charged with studying the pact
concluded that secret protocols dividing up Poland and the Baltic states
had indeed existed. Armed with this finding, Estonia literally linked up
with its Baltic neighbors on August 23 to form a 600-kilometer human
chain from Tallinn to the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, to draw worldwide
attention to the anniversary of the pact and to their cause. An
estimated 2 million Baltic residents participated in the show of unity,
but the action also elicited a harsh rebuke from Moscow several days
later. Tensions quickly mounted in Estonia, and the Estonian Popular
Front decided to cancel a major song festival and rally planned for
early September. In early August, Estonian nationalists had already been
shaken by their first confrontation with Soviet loyalists. Members of
the International Movement of Workers in the Estonian Soviet Socialist
Republic (Intermovement), primarily made up of ethnic Russians, had
staged strikes in Tallinn and northeastern Estonia protesting a set of
new electoral rules and a new language law requiring all service workers
to speak both Estonian and Russian. Many Russians in Estonia, fearful of
growing Estonian national feeling and of losing their privileges, looked
to Moscow for help. But direct intervention would not come.
Throughout the fall, independence sentiment continued to mount. In
October the Estonian Popular Front issued a campaign platform for
upcoming municipal elections in which it publicly endorsed full
independence. Meanwhile, more radical groups had begun organizing their
own campaign to restore independence, completely bypassing the Soviet
system. These groups, known as Estonian Citizens Committees, maintained
that because their country had been illegally occupied and annexed by
the Soviet Union and because the prewar republic still retained
international recognition, it could not legitimate Soviet authority by
negotiating "secession." Rather, Estonia had to insist on the
continuing legal authority of the prewar republic as the only sure way
to ward off Soviet attempts to keep it in the union. By invoking
international law, Estonia could also enlist Western support and
protection at a time when the Soviet Union needed good relations with
the West to facilitate its own reforms. By the fall of 1989, it was
clear that this argument and strategy would become essential to the
independence movement and, indeed, to politics thereafter.
To raise popular awareness of the independence issue, the Estonian
Citizens Committees mounted a year-long campaign to register all
citizens of the prewar republic and their descendants. Of an estimated 1
million such citizens, the grassroots movement succeeded in registering
about 700,000. It was this electorate that, according to the radical
committees, possessed the sole right to decide the future of
Soviet-occupied Estonia--not the Soviet-era Supreme Soviet, its
government, or even the half-million Soviet-era immigrants to Estonia
and their descendants, whom the committees claimed had taken up
residence under the terms of the Soviet occupation and who would later
be denied automatic citizenship. Rather, the committees asserted the
need to elect a new representative body to lead the independence
struggle and the restoration of the prewar republic. In February 1990,
they organized nationwide elections for a Congress of Estonia, which
held its first session the following month.
Although their campaign enabled the citizens committees and the
Congress to gain a fair amount of popular support, most Estonians were
not totally willing to forsake the Supreme Soviet because it, too, was
up for election in March 1990. The more moderate Estonian Popular Front
favored the Supreme Soviet as a more realistic path to independence. The
Estonian Popular Front campaigned heavily in March and won about forty
of the 101 seats. The Supreme Soviet elections also allowed all
residents of Estonia to vote, including Soviet-era immigrants and their
descendants. These were mostly Russians who, still led primarily by
Estonian Communist Party functionaries, finally elected a total of
twenty-seven pro-Soviet deputies. Although the two-thirds Estonian
majority consequently was slim, it was enough for the Supreme Soviet to
declare at its first full session, on March 30, the country's official
intention to reestablish its independence.
Unlike Lithuania's declaration of independence, Estonia's declaration
was not an outright break with the Soviet Union. Rather, it was an
attempt to find a compromise between the radical Congress of Estonia and
moderate Estonian Popular Front positions. Still, the message of
asserting independence from Moscow was the same. The Kremlin's reaction
was subdued; no economic sanctions were imposed on Estonia. Neither,
however, was any recognition accorded Estonia's dec-laration, nor were
any serious attempts made to begin talks with the new government in
Tallinn. In the meantime, therefore, Estonia attempted to shore up its
stance by finding new allies and initiating independent economic
policies. In May 1990, the leaders of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania met
formally in Tallinn to coordinate their strategy. In July
representatives of the three countries met for the first time with Boris
N. Yeltsin, who had just been elected chairman of the Russian Supreme
Soviet. Estonian politicians and government officials traveled in
Western Europe and the United States to renew Western contacts.
Domestically, in the fall of 1990 the Estonian government, led by
Estonian Popular Front leader Edgar Savisaar, began a series of moves to
assert the republic's economic independence and begin market reforms.
Financial contributions to the all-union budget were stopped, and
wide-ranging price reform was initiated. Plans for a separate currency,
begun in 1989, continued to be worked on. In October the government
dispatched militia forces to patrol the republic's border with Russia
and to control the movement of goods; control over western gateways
remained under Soviet control.
Moscow's bloody military assault on civilians in Vilnius and Riga in
January 1991 sent shock waves through Estonia as well. Although there
were no violent incidents in Estonia, Soviet loyalists staged a noisy
demonstration in Tallinn, and the government installed huge boulders in
front of the parliament building for protection. On January 12, Tallinn
was the site of a hastily organized summit meeting between the Baltic
leaders and Yeltsin, who supported the sovereignty of the three
republics against Gorbachev. Yeltsin and Estonian parliament chairman
Arnold R��tel signed a bilateral treaty recognizing the sovereignty of
each other's republic. When, later in the month, Gorbachev announced a
nationwide referendum on the issue of preserving the Soviet Union,
Estonia decided to preempt the ballot with a referendum of its own on
independence. The March 3 Estonian poll showed 78 percent in favor of
independence and indicated significant support for independence among
Russian residents--as much as 30 percent. Most Estonians boycotted the
Soviet referendum held two weeks later. With public opinion clearly
favoring independence, Gorbachev agreed to official talks with Estonia
beginning on March 28. The talks continued through August and the Moscow
coup, but no progress was made. Estonia refused to join negotiations for
a new union treaty, while the Kremlin avoided any specifics on
independence. The talks were further upset by several hit-and-run
attacks on Estonia's border outposts during the summer of 1991. These
were generally attributed to units of the Soviet Ministry of Internal
Affairs Special Forces Detachment (Otryad militsii osobogo
naznacheniya--OMON), commonly known as the Black Berets, over which
Gorbachev apparently had lost control.
Estonia - Independence Reclaimed, August 1991-October 1992
On the night of August 19, 1991, Estonia was caught up in the
uncertainty generated by the attempted coup in Moscow. A column of
Soviet light tanks and troop carriers had already started to move on
Tallinn as the commander of Soviet forces in the Baltics announced his
support of the coup. Fearing a total crackdown by the Soviet army, the
Estonian parliament met in emergency session on August 20. At 11:00
P.M., the Supreme Council, as the legislature was now known, passed a
final resolution declaring full independence and requesting de facto
international recognition. Volunteers were mustered to defend key
government buildings and communications centers; there was no bloodshed,
however. As Heinz Valk, an artist and a member of parliament, later
declared, "The coup in Moscow [gave] us a chance comparable to that
in 1918."
Once the coup finally collapsed, Estonia resumed its efforts to gain
international recognition and otherwise reestablish itself as an
independent state. Iceland was the first to acknowledge Estonian
independence, on August 22; Yeltsin's Russia was quick to follow, on
August 24. The United States hesitated until September 2. The Soviet
Union recognized Estonia on September 6. The process of state building
also began soon after the coup. In contrast to Latvia and Lithuania,
Estonia, in its August 20 independence declaration, took the additional
step of convening a constitutional assembly immediately to draft a new
basic law for the country. The assembly drew thirty members each from
the Supreme Council and the Congress of Estonia, thus defusing rivalries
between the two organizations. In mid-October the assembly settled on a
working draft focused on a generally parliamentary form of government.
Deliberations then slowed as the country got caught up in debates over
citizenship.
In Estonia's fight to regain independence, the overall strategy of
asserting the country's legal continuity as a state clearly had paid
off. Yet, in terms of offering a path for the future, this strategy had
many complications. One of these was the question of what to do with the
500,000 mostly Russian, Soviet-era immigrants living in Estonia. In 1990
the Congress of Estonia had been the first representative body to lay
down the principle that because these people had settled in Estonia
under Soviet rule, they were not automatically citizens of the legally
restored Estonian state. Rather, under independence they would have to
be "naturalized" on the basis of specific language and
residency criteria. This position was also argued as a means of better
integrating the mostly Russian noncitizen population, the majority of
whom did not speak Estonian. In mid-1991, as the independence struggle
seemed to languish, the Estonian government, led by Prime Minister Edgar
Savisaar, showed signs of readiness to compromise on the citizenship
issue in order to gain more local Russian support. However, after the
failed August coup and the immediate onset of full independence, the
Congress and other radical groups were emboldened to insist on the
principle of restricted citizenship. Thus, the Supreme Council decided
on November 11, 1991, to require the naturalization of all Soviet-era
immigrants to Estonia while automatically renewing the citizenship of
all prewar citizens and their descendants. In February 1992, the
parliament set naturalization terms, which included a two-year residency
requirement, the ability to speak conversational Estonian, and a
one-year waiting period after applying.
Although these terms were relatively mild, the implications in
Estonia's particular situation remained less than clear. Most Soviet-era
immigrants had already fulfilled the residency requirement, but at best
only 20 percent were prepared to meet the language requirement. Most
Russians living in Estonia had not bothered to learn the rudiments of
the national language, forcing Estonians to speak Russian to them
instead. It would take time for many to begin learning. In any case, the
naturalization procedures would delay nationalization for at least the
one-year waiting period. This outcome had serious implications because
the resident Russians would then be ineligible to vote in the September
1992 elections for a new parliament. As the only consolation to
noncitizens, the Constitu-tional Assembly later accorded them the right
to vote in local elections under the terms of the new constitution.
The citizenship issue generally heightened tensions between Estonians
and Russians. The more nationalistic Estonian deputies in parliament
began to accuse the moderate government of Savisaar of foot-dragging. In
January 1992, in the midst of a severe economic crisis and problems
securing heating oil, Savisaar asked parliament for emergency powers.
When the vote on emergency powers was taken on January 16, Savisaar won,
thanks only to the votes of several Russian deputies. This narrow margin
revealed the extent of Savisaar's unpopularity among the Estonian
deputies, and a week later he resigned. Savisaar's transportation
minister, Tiit V�hi, was charged with forming a new government, which
was billed as one of technocrats and caretakers in advance of
parliamentary elections in the fall.
As V�hi formed his regime, several major issues remained
outstanding. The new prime minister's first task was to oversee the
passage of the naturalization requirements for citizenship, which
occurred in late February. Then, the language and residency requirements
were put into effect. Thereafter, the draft constitution drawn up by the
Constitutional Assembly neared completion and required approval by
popular referendum. This referendum was set for June 28, 1992, with only
citizens allowed to participate. Alongside the proposed constitution, a
second question asked the people whether to allow the earliest
applicants for citizenship to vote on an exceptional basis in the
upcoming nationwide elections. Because these applicants numbered just
over 5,000, the gesture would be largely symbolic. However, a strong
campaign by nationalist Estonian parties led to the defeat of the
measure, 53 percent to 46 percent. The constitution was passed by a 91
percent majority.
On June 20, one week before the referendum, the V�hi government
completed its third remaining task: currency reform. On that day,
Estonian residents proudly cashed in their old, worn Russian rubles for
crisp, new Estonian kroons (for value of the kroon--see Glossary). The
kroon, pegged to the stable deutsche mark, would soon bring inflation
tumbling down and serve as the basis for a new economy (see Economy,
this ch.).
With the constitution approved and a new state structure in place,
the campaign began for Estonia's first post-Soviet elections. The
election of a new legislature, the Riigikogu, on September 20 would mark
the full restoration of the legal Republic of Estonia. On October 5,
1992, in its first session, the Riigikogu, which replaced the
transitional Supreme Council, issued a declaration establishing its
legal continuity with the prewar republic and declaring an official end
to the transition to independence announced two-and-one-half years
earlier.