Caribbean Islands - Acknowledgments
Caribbean Islands
The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of Irving Kaplan,
Howard I. Blutstein, Kathryn Therese Johnston, and David S. McMorris,
who wrote the 1976 edition of the Area Handbook for Jamaica,
and Jan Knippers Black, Howard I. Blutstein, Kathryn Therese Johnston,
and David S. McMorris, who wrote the 1976 edition of the Area
Handbook for Trinidad and Tobago. Their work provided a useful
guide in organizing portions of chapters 2 and 3 of the present volume.
The authors are grateful to individuals in various agencies of the
United States government and international and private institutions who
gave of their time, research materials, and special knowledge to provide
information and perspective. The staffs of various Commonwealth
Caribbean embassies, the InterAmerican Development Bank, and the World
Bank provided materials that were unavailable from other sources.
Stephen F. Clarke, senior legal specialist at the American-British Law
Division, Library of Congress, offered insights on the structure and
functions of the Eastern Caribbean court system. None of these
individuals is in any way responsible for the work of the authors,
however.
The authors also wish to thank those who contributed directly to the
preparation of the manuscript. These include Richard F. Nyrop, who
reviewed all drafts and served as liaison with the sponsoring agency;
Martha E. Hopkins, who edited portions of the manuscript and managed its
production; Barbara Auerbach, Vincent Ercolano, and Marilyn L. Majeska,
who also edited portions of the manuscript; Barbara Edgerton, Janie L.
Gilchrist, Monica Shimmin, and Izella Watson who did the word
processing; Andrea T. Merrill, who performed the final prepublication
editorial review; Diann Johnson of the Printing and Processing Section,
Library of Congress, who phototypeset the manuscript under the
supervision of Peggy Pixley; and Editorial Experts, which compiled the
index.
Finally, the authors would like to thank several individuals who
provided research support. Joan C. Barch, Susan Lender, Timothy L.
Merrill, and Marjorie F. Thomas wrote the geography sections in chapters
2 through 6. Timothy L. Merrill also supplied the authors with data on
telecommunications and transportation.
Preface
This study is an attempt to treat in a compact and objective manner
the dominant social, political, economic, and military aspects of the
contemporary islands of the Commonwealth Caribbean. Sources of
information included scholarly books, journals, and monographs; official
reports of governments and international organizations; numerous
periodicals; and interviews with individuals having special competence
in Caribbean affairs. A bibliography appears at the end of the book.
Measurements are given in the metric system.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - Regional Overview
Caribbean Islands
THE COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN ISLANDS have a distinctive history.
Permanently influenced by the experiences of colonialism and slavery,
the Caribbean has produced a collection of societies that are markedly
different in population composition from those in any other region of
the world.
Lying on the sparsely settled periphery of an irregularly populated
continent, the region was "discovered" by Christopher Columbus
in 1492. Thereafter, it became the springboard for the European invasion
and domination of the Americas, a transformation that historian D. W.
Meinig has aptly described as the "radical reshaping of
America." Beginning with the Spanish and Portuguese and continuing
with the arrival more than a century later of other Europeans, the
indigenous peoples of the Americas experienced a series of upheavals.
The European intrusion abruptly interrupted the pattern of their
historical development and linked them inextricably with the world
beyond the Atlantic Ocean. It also severely altered their physical
environment, introducing both new foods and new epidemic diseases. As a
result, the native Indian populations rapidly declined and virtually
disappeared from the Caribbean, although they bequeathed to the region a
distinct cultural heritage that is still seen and felt.
During the sixteenth century, the Caribbean region was significant to
the Spanish empire. In the seventeenth century, the English, Dutch, and
French established colonies. By the eighteenth century, the region
contained colonies that were vitally important for all of the European
powers because the colonies generated great wealth from the production
and sale of sugar.
The early English colonies, peopled and controlled by white settlers,
were microcosms of English society, with small yeoman farming economies
based mainly on tobacco and cotton. A major transformation occurred,
however, with the establishment of the sugar plantation system. To meet
the system's enormous manpower requirements, vast numbers of black
African slaves were imported throughout the eighteenth century, thereby
reshaping the region's demographic, social, and cultural profile.
Although the white populations maintained their social and political
preeminence, they became a numerical minority in all of the islands.
Following the abolition of slavery in the mid-nineteenth century, the
colonies turned to imported indentured labor from India, China, and the
East Indies, further diversifying the region's culture and society. The
result of all these immigrations is a remarkable cultural heterogeneity
in contemporary Caribbean society.
The abolition of slavery was also a major watershed in Caribbean
history in that it initiated the long, slow process of enfranchisement
and political control by the nonwhite majorities in the islands. The
early colonies enjoyed a relatively great amount of autonomy through the
operations of their local representative assemblies. Later, however, for
ease of administration and to facilitate control of increasingly
assertive colonial representative bodies, the British adopted a system
of direct administration known as crown colony government in which
Britishappointed governors wielded nearly autocratic power. The history
of the colonies from then until 1962 when the first colonies became
independent is marked by the rise of popular movements and labor
organizations and the emergence of a generation of politicians who
assumed positions of leadership when the colonial system in the British
Caribbean was dismantled.
Despite shared historical and cultural experiences and geographic,
demographic, and economic similarities, the islands of the former
British Caribbean empire remain diverse, and attempts at political
federation and economic integration both prior to and following
independence have foundered. Thus, the region today is characterized by
a proliferation of mini-states, all with strong democratic traditions
and political systems cast in the Westminster parliamentary mold, but
all also with forceful individual identities and interests.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - THE COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN
Caribbean Islands
THE COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN is the term applied to the English-
speaking islands in the Carribbean and the mainland nations of Belize
(formerly British Honduras) and Guyana (formerly British Guiana) that
once constituted the Caribbean portion of the British Empire. This
volume examines only the islands of the Commonwealth Caribbean, which
are Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, the Windward Islands (Dominica, St.
Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Grenada), Barbados, the
Leeward Islands (Antigua and Barbuda, St. Christopher [hereafter, St.
Kitts] and Nevis, the British Virgin Islands, Anguilla, and Montserrat),
and the so-called Northern Islands (the Bahamas, the Cayman Islands, and
the Turks and Caicos Islands).
To the casual observer, these islands might appear to be too
disparate to allow for a common discussion. Consider, for instance, the
differences in population, size, income, ethnic composition, and
political status among the various islands. Anguilla's 7,000 residents
live on an island totaling 91 square kilometers, whereas Jamaica has a
population of 2.3 million and a territory of nearly 11,000 square
kilometers. The per capita gross domestic product (GDP--see Glossary) of
the Cayman Islands is nearly fourteen times as large as that of St.
Vincent and the Grenadines. Trinidad and Tobago's population is evenly
divided between blacks and East Indians, a pattern quite different from
that on the other islands, on which blacks constitute an overwhelming
majority. Although most of the islands are independent nations, five
(the British Virgin Islands, Anguilla, Montserrat, the Cayman Islands,
and the Turks and Caicos Islands) remain British dependencies.
These and other differences, however, should not obscure the
extensive ties that bind the islands of the Commonwealth Caribbean. For
instance, the islands' populations clearly regard themselves as distinct
from their Latin American neighbors and identify more closely with the
British Commonwealth of Nations than with Latin America (see Appendix
B). All of the Commonwealth Caribbean islands except Grenada supported
Britain's actions during the 1982 South Atlantic War in the
Falkland/Malvinas Islands, in sharp contrast to the strong Latin
American defense of the Argentine position.
This perceived distinctiveness emerged from the islands' shared
historical experiences. Their transformation during the seventeenth
century from a tobacco- to a sugar-based economy permanently changed
life on the islands, as a plantation society employing African slave
labor replaced the previous society of small landholders (see The Sugar
Revolutions and Slavery, ch. 1). By the early nineteenth century, blacks
constituted at least 80 percent of the population in all but one of the
British Caribbean islands. The exception was Trinidad, which had begun
bringing in large numbers of slaves only in the 1780s and 1790s. When
the British abolished slavery in the Caribbean in the 1830s, Trinidadian
planters imported indentured labor from India to work the sugarcane
fields. Despite their numerical minority, whites continued to control
political and economic affairs throughout the islands. Indeed, the
all-white House of Assembly in Jamaica abolished itself in 1865 rather
than share power with blacks. This abrogation of local assemblies and
establishment of crown colony government (see Glossary) was the norm in
the British Caribbean in the late 1800s and impeded the development of
political parties and organizations.
Demands for political reform quickened after World War I with the
appearance of a nascent middle class and the rise of trade unions. In
the mid-1930s, the islands became engulfed by riots spawned by the
region's difficult economic conditions (see Labor Organizations, ch. 1).
The riots demonstrated the bankruptcy of the old sugar plantation system
and sounded the death knell for colonial government. Beginning in the
1940s, the British allowed increasing levels of self-government and
encouraged the emergence of moderate black political leaders. As a
prelude to political independence for the region, the British
established a federation in 1958 consisting of ten island groupings. The
West Indies Federation succumbed, however, to the parochial concerns of
the two largest members--Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago--both of which
declared independence in 1962. Between 1966 and 1983, eight additional
independent nations were carved out of the British Caribbean.
These ten island nations are located in a strategically significant
area. Merchant or naval shipping from United States ports in the Gulf of
Mexico--including resupply of North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces
in wartime--cross narrow Caribbean passages that constitute "choke
points." The Caribbean Basin also links United States naval forces
operating in the North Atlantic and South Atlantic areas and provides an
important source of many raw materials imported by the United States
(see Current Strategic Considerations, ch. 7).
Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, the United States
asserted its interest in the Caribbean by frequently intervening in the
affairs of the Hispanic islands. It did not involve itself, however, in
the British colonies, a difference that may explain the relatively
harmonious state of relations between the United States and the
Commonwealth Caribbean islands when compared with the often contentious
tone evident in United States- Latin American interactions. During World
War II, and especially after 1960, the United States began to assume
Britain's security and defense responsibilities for the Commonwealth
Caribbean. Nonetheless, Britain continued to provide police training and
remained an important trading partner with the region.
The political systems of the Commonwealth Caribbean nations
paradoxically are both stable and fragile. All have inherited strong
democratic traditions and parliamentary systems of government formed on
the Westminster model. Political succession generally has been handled
peacefully and democratically. For example, Barbados' Parliament deftly
coped with the deaths in office of prime ministers J.M.G.M.
"Tom" Adams in 1985 and Errol Barrow in 1987. At the same
time, however, the multi-island character of many of these nations makes
them particularly susceptible to fragmentation. The British had hoped to
lessen the vulnerability of the smaller islands by making them part of
larger, more viable states. This policy often was resented deeply by the
unions' smaller partners, who charged that the larger islands were
neglecting them. The most contentious case involved one of the former
members of the West Indies Federation, St. Kitts-Nevis- Anguilla. In
1967 Anguillans evicted the Kittitian police force from the island and
shortly thereafter declared independence. Despite the landing of British
troops on the island two years later, Anguilla continued to resist union
with St. Kitts and Nevis. Ultimately, the British bowed to Anguillan
sentiments and administered the island as a separate dependency.
Separatist attitudes also predominated in Nevis; the situation there was
resolved, however, by granting Nevisians extensive local autonomy and a
guaranteed constitutional right of secession.
The fragility of these systems also has been underscored in the 1980s
by a reliance on violence for political ends. Grenada, Dominica, and St.
Vincent and the Grenadines offered the most dramatic examples (see
Regional Security Threats, 1970-81, ch. 7). Over a four-year span,
Grenada experienced the overthrow of a democratically elected but
corrupt administration, the establishment of the self-styled People's
Revolutionary Government (PRG), the bloody collapse of the PRG and its
replacement by the hard-line Revolutionary Military Council, and the
intervention of United States troops and defense and police forces from
six Commonwealth Caribbean nations (Jamaica, Barbados, Antigua and
Barbuda, Dominica, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines). In
1981 the Dominican government foiled a coup attempt involving a former
prime minister, the country's defense force, the Ku Klux Klan,
neo-Nazis, mercenaries, and underworld elements from the United States.
Several months later, members of the then-disbanded defense force
attacked Dominica's police headquarters and prison in an effort to free
the coup participants. In 1979 Rastafarians (see Glossary) seized the
airport, police station, and revenue office on Union Island in the
Grenadines.
Most of the island governments were quite unprepared to deal with
political violence; indeed, only five--Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas,
Barbados, Jamaica, and Trinidad and Tobago--have defense forces, the
largest of which has only a little over 2,000 members. In response, the
governments of Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Dominica, St. Lucia, and
St. Vincent and the Grenadines signed a regional security accord that
allowed for the coordination of defense efforts and the establishment of
paramilitary units drawn from the islands' police forces. Nonetheless,
Commonwealth Caribbean leaders generally opposed creating a regional
army and contended that such a force might eventually threaten democracy
in the region (see A Regional Security System; Controversial Security
Issues, ch. 7).
Drug trafficking represents an additional threat to the islands'
political systems. The Caribbean has become increasingly important as a
transit point for the transshipment of narcotics from Latin America to
the United States. Narcotics traffickers have offered payoffs to
Caribbean officials to ensure safe passage of their product through the
region. Numerous examples abound of officials prepared to enter into
such arrangements. In 1985 a Miami jury convicted Chief Minister Norman
Saunders of the Turks and Caicos Islands of traveling to the United
States to engage in narcotics transactions. A year later, a Trinidadian
and Tobagonian government report implicated cabinet members, customs
officials, policemen, and bank executives in a conspiracy to ship
cocaine to the United States. Bahamian prime minister Lynden O. Pindling
frequently has been accused of personally profiting from drug
transactions, charges that he vehemently denies. The most recent
accusation came in January 1988, when a prosecution witness in the
Jacksonville, Florida, trial of Colombian cocaine trafficker Carlos
Lehder Rivas claimed that Lehder paid Pindling US$88,000 per month to
protect the Colombian's drug operations.
Yet the greatest challenges facing the Commonwealth Caribbean in the
1980s were not political but economic. The once-dominant sugar industry
was beset by inefficient production, falling yields, a steady erosion of
world prices, and a substantial reduction in United States import
quotas. The unemployment level on most of the islands hovered at around
20 percent, a figure that would have been much higher were it not for
continued Caribbean emigration to Britain, the United States, and
Canada. Ironically, however, because the islands' education systems
failed to train workers for a technologically complex economy, many
skilled and professional positions went unfilled. In addition, the
islands were incapable of producing most capital goods required for
economic growth and development; imports of such goods helped generate
balance of payments deficits and increasing levels of external
indebtedness.
In the early 1980s, regional leaders hoped that President Ronald
Reagan's administration's Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI) would produce
a substantial rise in exports to the United States, thus alleviating
economic problems (see Appendix D). The most important part of the
CBI--the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (CBERA) of 1983--allowed
eligible Caribbean nations duty-free access to the United States for
most exports until 1995. The CBERA, however, excluded some of the
region's most important exports, including textiles, apparel, footwear,
and sugar. Although nontraditional exports from the Caribbean to the
United States increased during the first five years of the CBI,
Caribbean governments expressed disappointment with the program's
overall results. Legislation introduced in the United States Congress in
1987 called for an extension of the CBI until 2007, an expansion of
products included under the duty-free access provision, and a
restoration of sugar quotas to 1984 levels. Although the status of the
bill remained uncertain in mid-1988, few analysts anticipated changes in
sugar import quotas.
Despite the generally troubling economic picture, the tourist sector
demonstrated considerable vitality in the 1980s. Commonwealth Caribbean
nations successfully marketed the region's beauty, climate, and beaches
to a receptive North American audience. As a result, many of the nations
achieved dramatic increases in tourist arrivals and net earnings from
tourism. For example, the number of foreign visitors to the Bahamas
climbed from 1.7 million in 1982 to 3 million in 1986. The British
Virgin Islands recorded 161,625 visitors in 1984, an increase of 91,338
as compared with 1976. Jamaica doubled its earnings over the 1980-86
period to stand at US$437 million in 1986. At the same time, however,
the sector became quite susceptible to occasional slumps in the United
States economy. Two months after the October 1987 stock market crash on
Wall Street, tourist arrivals in Jamaica declined by 10 percent compared
with the previous year.
In an effort to minimize their overall economic vulnerability, the
independent nations of the Commonwealth Caribbean and the British crown
colony of Montserrat established the Caribbean Community and Common
Market (Caricom--see Appendix C) in 1973. Caricom had a number of goals,
the most important of which were economic integration through the
creation of a regional common market, diversification and specialization
of production, and functional cooperation.
The organization's greatest success was in the area of functional
cooperation; by the late 1980s, almost two dozen regional institutions
had been created, including the University of the West Indies, the
Caribbean Development Bank, the Caribbean Meteorological Council, the
West Indies Shipping Corporation (WISCO), and the Caribbean Marketing
Enterprise. Not all members of Caricom felt that they shared equitably
in the services provided by these institutions, however. In 1987, for
example, Dominica, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Belize withdrew
from WISCO, claiming that the corporation had provided them with few
benefits.
Despite success in functional cooperation, Caricom has an uneven
track record in achieving economic integration and diversification and
specialization. Although members registered substantial increases in
intraregional trade during the 1973-81 period, much duplication of
production occurred. Over the next five years, intraregional trade
declined by more than 50 percent, the result in part of the adoption of
protectionist measures by the region's largest consumer, Trinidad and
Tobago. In 1987 the cause of regional integration was revived somewhat
by Trinidad and Tobago's decision to repeal the provisions in question
and by the Caricom members' joint pledge to remove all barriers to
intraregional trade by the end of the third quarter of 1988. Even if
this commitment is honored, however, depressed demand in the region will
inhibit exports.
The most extensive level of cooperation has occurred among seven
small islands and island groupings of the Eastern Caribbean (see
Glossary). The seven--Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada,
Montserrat, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the
Grenadines--have a long history of integration that includes a common
market, shared currency, and joint supreme court. In 1981 they formed
the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS--see Glossary) as a
Caricom associate institution to provide for enhanced economic, foreign
policy, and defense cooperation. In May 1987 OECS leaders announced an
agreement in principle to form one nation and called for referenda to be
held on each island to approve or reject the proposed union. The
original plan actually envisaged two separate votes: the first,
scheduled for mid-1988, to determine whether unification was desired,
and a subsequent ballot the following year to specify the kind of
government of the new state. If approved, the union would be established
in late 1989 or early 1990.
The fate of the proposed OECS political union remained uncertain as
of May 1988. Although Antigua and Barbuda's prime minister Vere Cornwall
Bird, Sr., announced his opposition to the plan in July 1987, the other
six heads of government continued to support unification. Nonetheless,
these leaders resisted demands from ten opposition parties to provide
specific details of the proposed venture prior to the first vote. This
resistance perhaps stemmed from the leaders' perception that most
islanders favored unification in some form; indeed, even the opposition
parties-- under the banner of the Standing Committee of Popular
Democratic Parties of the Eastern Caribbean (SCOPE)--felt compelled to
endorse the idea of union. Still, SCOPE and others raised many issues
that needed to be resolved. How much political authority would the six
states retain under an OECS government? Would the states be granted
equal representation in one of the houses of an OECS parliament? Would
civil service employees be subject to transfer anywhere in the new
state? Would a uniform wage structure be enacted for these employees?
Would Nevisians continue to have local autonomy and a right of
secession? Would Montserratians support independence? Thus, a positive
vote in the first referenda might lead to contentious debates in the
Eastern Caribbean in 1989.
Dynamic political activity was also in evidence in early 1988 in the
Turks and Caicos Islands and Trinidad and Tobago. In March 1988 the
People's Democratic Movement (PDM) crushed the Progressive National
Party (PNP) in parliamentary elections in the Turks and Caicos, winning
eleven of thirteen seats; PDM leader Oswald Skippings became the
islands' chief minister. The elections were the first held in the Turks
and Caicos since the British imposed direct British rule on the
territory in July 1986 (see British Dependencies: The Cayman Islands and
the Turks and Caicos Islands, Government and Politics, ch. 6). That
action was taken after a Royal Commission of Inquiry found the chief
minister and PNP head, Nathaniel "Bops" Francis, guilty of
unconstitutional behavior and ministerial malpractices. Interestingly,
the commission also determined that then-PDM deputy leader Skippings was
unfit for public office.
The continued decline in 1987 of the economy in Trinidad and Tobago
placed considerable strains on the ruling National Alliance for
Reconstruction (NAR). Against a backdrop of sharp reductions in the
gross domestic product and in public expenditures, Prime Minister A.N.R.
Robinson openly feuded with the former leaders of the East Indian-based
United Labour Front, one of four political parties that had merged to
create the NAR--the others being the Democratic Action Congress (DAC),
the Organization for National Reconstruction (ONR), and Tapia House (see
Political Dynamics, ch. 3). In November 1987 Robinson fired the minister
of works, John Humphrey, for criticizing the government's economic
performance. In response, Humphrey accused the prime minister of failing
to consult with cabinet members. In January 1988 external affairs
minister and NAR deputy leader Basdeo Panday, public utilities minister
Kelvin Ramnath, and junior finance minister Trevor Sudama participated
in a meeting of over 100 NAR dissidents seeking Robinson's ouster; the
prime minister dismissed the three from his cabinet the following month.
Although each side accused the other of trying to divide the nation
between blacks and East Indians, neither called for the breakup of NAR.
All of the sacked ministers remained as NAR members of the House of
Representatives; Panday also resumed his duties as president of the All
Trinidad Sugar Estates and Factory Workers Trade Union.
Thus, the Commonwealth Caribbean islands offer a study in contrast,
and sometimes conflict, within their individual boundaries and among
themselves. A region gifted by abundant natural beauty and a pleasant
climate, it looks to North America to generate increasing tourist
dollars. Yet the islands also seek to maintain their independence from
North American and West European dominance. Beset by internal bickering,
the region nevertheless has seen economic interdependency blossom among
some of its parts. Although distinct from Latin America, it suffers from
some of the same ills, including the infiltration of the drug trade into
its politics. It is a region that could be on the brink of true
cooperation or on the path of further disunity.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - GEOGRAPHIC SETTING
Caribbean Islands
The Commonwealth Caribbean islands make up a large subcomponent of
the hundreds of islands in the Caribbean Sea, forming a wide arc between
Florida in the north and Venezuela in the south, as well as a barrier
between the Caribbean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean (see fig. ___, Regional
Map). Varying considerably in size, the islands, which are the isolated
upper parts of a submerged chain of volcanic mountains, are scattered
over thousands of square kilometers of sea. The entire region lies well
within the northern tropics.
The three principal geological formations found throughout the
Caribbean are igneous and metamorphic rocks, limestone hills or karst,
and coastal, sedimentary plains of varying depths, resulting in three
prevailing types of topography, found either separately or in
combination. The first consists of high (over 1,200 meters), rugged,
sharply dissected mountains--such as the Blue Mountains in eastern
Jamaica, the Morne Diablotins in central Dominica, the Pitons in St.
Lucia, and the Northern Range in Trinidad--all covered with dense,
evergreen rain forests and cut by swiftly flowing rivers. The second
typography consists of very hilly countryside, such as the high plateau
of central Jamaica, or the islands of St. Kitts, Antigua, and Barbados.
There the hills seldom rise above 600 meters and are more gently sloped
than the high mountains, but karst areas are still rugged. Finally, the
coastal plains skirt the hills and mountains, with their greatest
extensions usually on the southern or western sides of the mountains.
Active volcanoes exist in Dominica, St. Vincent, and St. Lucia, and
there are crater lakes formed by older activity in Grenada. All the
islands have rugged coastlines with innumerable inlets fringed by white
or dark sands (depending on the rock substratum ) of varying texture.
The beaches of Negril, Jamaica, and Grand Anse, Grenada, have
fine-textured white sands that extend for nearly eleven kilometers each.
The Caribbean climate is tropical, moderated to a certain extent by
the prevailing northeast trade winds. Individual climatic conditions are
strongly dependent on elevation. At sea level there is little variation
in temperature, regardless of the time of the day or the season of the
year. Temperatures range between 24�C and 32�C. In Kingston, Jamaica,
the mean temperature is 26�C, whereas Mandeville, at a little over 600
meters high in the Carpenters Mountains of Manchester Parish, has
recorded temperatures as low as 10�C. Daylight hours tend to be shorter
during summer and slightly longer during winter than in the higher
latitudes. The conventional division, rather than the four seasons, is
between the long rainy season from May through October and the dry
season, corresponding to winter in the northern hemisphere.
Even during the rainy period, however, the precipitation range
fluctuates greatly. Windward sides of islands with mountains receive
much rain, whereas leeward sides can have very dry conditions. Flat
islands receive slightly less rainfall, but its pattern is more
consistent. For example, the Blue Mountains of eastern Jamaica record
around 558 centimeters of rainfall per year, whereas Kingston, on the
southeastern coast, receives only 399 centimeters. Bridgetown, the
capital of Barbados, has an average annual rainfall of 127 centimeters,
while Bathsheba on the central east coast receives 254
centimeters--despite the fact that Bathsheba is only about 27 kilometers
away by road. Recording stations in the Northern Range in Trinidad
measure some 302 centimeters of rainfall per year, while at Piarco
Airport on the Caroni Plains the measurement is only 140 centimeters.
Most of the rainfall occurs during short heavy outbursts during daylight
hours. In Jamaica, about 80 percent of the rainfall occurs during the
day. The period of heaviest rainfall usually occurs after the sun has
passed directly overhead, which in the Caribbean islands would be
sometime around the middle of May and again in early August. The rainy
season also coincides with the disastrous summer hurricane season,
although Barbados, too far east, and Trinidad and Tobago, too far south,
seldom experience hurricanes.
Hurricanes are a constant feature of most of the Caribbean, with a
"season" of their own lasting from June to November.
Hurricanes develop over the ocean (usually in the eastern Caribbean)
during the summer months when the sea surface temperature is high (over
27�C) and the air pressure falls below 950 millibars. These conditions
create an "eye" about 20 kilometers wide, around which a steep
pressure gradient forms that generates wind speeds of 110 to 280
kilometers per hour. The diameter of hurricanes can extend as far as 500
to 800 kilometers and produce extremely heavy rainfalls as well as
considerable destruction of property. The recent history of the
Caribbean echoes with the names of destructive hurricanes: Janet (1955),
Donna (1960), Hattie (1961), Flora (1963), Beulah (1967), Celia and
Dorothy (1970), Eloise (1975), David (1979), and Allen (1980).
The natural resources of the Commonwealth Caribbean islands are
extremely limited. Jamaica has extensive deposits of bauxite, some of
which is mined and processed locally into alumina, with the United
States being the largest market for the bauxite and alumina. In
addition, Jamaica has large quantities of gypsum. Trinidad and Tobago
has petroleum, pitch, and natural gas. Small, noncommercially viable
deposits of manganese, lead, copper, and zinc are found throughout most
of the islands. Nevertheless, most of the territories possess nothing
more valuable than beautiful beaches, marvelously variegated seas, and a
pleasant climate conducive to the promotion of international tourism.
Industrialization varies from territory to territory, but agriculture
is generally declining on all the islands. The sugar industry, once the
mainstay of the Caribbean economies, has faltered. Although the labor
force employed in sugar production (and in agriculture in general) still
forms the major sector of the employed labor force in Barbados and
Jamaica, the contribution that sugar makes to the gross domestic product
(GDP--see Glossary) has steadily dropped. Barbados has kept its sugar
industry going, but it has steadily reduced dependence on sugar exports
and diversified its economy. For example, in 1946 Barbados had 52 sugar
factories producing nearly 100,000 tons of sugar and employing more than
25,000 persons during crop-time. Although production had increased by
1980, the number of factories had declined to eight, and the number
employed was slightly less than 9,000. Furthermore, the proportion of
GDP contributed by sugar and sugar products had declined from 37.8
percent to 10.9 percent over the same period.
Since the 1950s, light manufacturing, mining, and processing of foods
and other commodities have been used to bolster employment and increase
the local economies. Although these sectors have been important
contributors to the GDP of the individual states, in no case does this
contribution exceed 20 percent of the total. Moreover, industrialization
has provided neither sufficient jobs nor sufficient wealth for the state
to offset the decline in agricultural production and labor absorption.
The Commonwealth Caribbean islands, like the rest of the region
(except Cuba), find themselves in a difficult trading situation with the
United States. From the regional perspective, the United States accounts
for between 20 and 50 percent of all imports and exports. On the other
hand, the Commonwealth states account for less than 1 percent of all
United States imports and exports and less than 5 percent of the more
than US$38 billion of overseas private investment in the Western
hemisphere. But the interest in the Commonwealth Caribbean islands
cannot be measured in economic terms only. The Caribbean is clearly
within the American sphere of interest for political and strategic
considerations that defy economic valuation.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL SETTING
Caribbean Islands
The Pre-European Population
Before the arrival of Christopher Columbus in 1492, most of the
Caribbean was peopled by three types, or groups, of inhabitants: the
Ciboney or Guanahuatebey, the Taino or Arawak, and the Caribs. The
cultural distinctions among the three groups are not great; the single
greatest differentiating factor appears to be their respective dates of
arrival in the region. The Ciboney seem to have arrived first and were
found in parts of Cuba and the Bahamas. They also seem to have had the
most elementary forms of social organization. The most numerous groups
were the Arawaks, who resided in most of the Greater Antilles--Cuba,
Jamaica, Hispaniola (presently, Haiti and the Dominican Republic), and
Puerto Rico. The smaller eastern island chain was the home of the
Caribs, a tropical forest group related to most of the indigenous
Indians found in Central and South America. Barbados and a number of
smaller islands were not permanently inhabited.
Estimates of the size of the pre-Hispanic population of the Americas
vary considerably. Both Columbus and Father Bartolom� de Las Casas (who
wrote the first history of the Spanish conquest and treatment of the
Indians) produced estimates that appear to defy credibility. Las Casas
thought the population of the Caribbean might have been in the vicinity
of several million, and by virtue of his having lived in both Hispaniola
and Cuba where he held encomiendas, or the right to tribute
from Indians, he is as close as we get to an eye-witness account. Las
Casas had a penchant for hyperbole, and it is doubtful that he could
have produced reliable estimates for areas where he did not travel.
Nevertheless, some more recent scholars have tended to agree with Las
Casas, estimating as many as 4 million inhabitants for the island of
Hispaniola in 1492. Although the dispute continues, a consensus seems to
be developing for far lower figures than previously accepted.
An indigenous population of less than a million for all of the
Caribbean would still be a relatively dense population, given the
technology and resources of the region in the late fifteenth century.
Probably one-half of these inhabitants would have been on the large
island of Hispaniola, about 50,000 in Cuba, and far fewer than that in
Jamaica. Puerto Rico, Dominica, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, and Trinidad all
had fairly concentrated, if not large, populations.
The pre-European populations of the territories that later formed the
Commonwealth Caribbean belonged to the groups designated as Caribs and
Arawaks. Both were tropical forest people, who probably originated in
the vast expanse of forests of the northern regions of South America and
were related linguistically and ethnically to such present-day tropical
forest peoples as the Chibcha, the Warao, the Yanomamo, the Caracas, the
Caquet�o, or the Jirajara--in short, the peoples found anywhere from
Panama to Brazil.
The Arawaks lived in theocratic kingdoms, with a hierarchically
arranged pantheon of gods, called zemis, and village chiefs, or
caciques. The zemis were represented by icons of wood,
stone, bones, and human remains. Arawaks believed that being in the good
graces of their zemis protected them from disease, hurricanes,
or disaster in war. They therefore served cassava (manioc) bread as well
as beverages and tobacco to their zemis as propitiatory
offerings.
The size of the community and the number of zemis he owned
were directly related to the chief's importance. Chiefs lived in
rectangular huts, called bohios, while the regular members of
the community lived in round huts, called caneyes. The
construction of both types of building was the same: wooden frames,
topped by straw, with earthen floor, and scant interior furnishing. But
the buildings were strong enough to resist hurricanes.
From the European perspective, the wealth of the indigenous Indians
was modest indeed. While Columbus and his successors sought gold and
other trading commodities of value on the European market, the native
Antilleans were not interested in trade and used gold only ornamentally.
Their personal possessions consisted of wooden stools with four legs and
carved backs, approximately two-meter- long hammocks of cotton cloth or
strings for sleeping, clay and wooden bowls for mixing and serving food,
calabashes or gourds for drinking water and bailing out boats, and their
most prized possession, large dugout canoes for transportation, fishing,
and water sports. One such canoe found in Jamaica could transport about
seventy-five persons.
The Indians painted their bodies in bright colors, and some wore
small ornaments of gold and shells in their noses, around their necks,
or hanging from their ears. Body-painting was also employed to
intimidate opponents in warfare.
Arawak villagers produced about two crops per year of manioc, maize,
potatoes, peanuts, peppers, beans, and arrowroot. Cultivation was by the
slash-and-burn method common throughout the Middle Americas, with the
cultivated area's being abandoned after the harvest. The Indians worked
the soil with sticks, called coas, and built earthen mounds in
which they planted their crops. They might also have used fertilizers of
ash, composted material, and feces to boost productivity. There is even
evidence of simple irrigation in parts of southwestern Hispaniola.
Hunting and fishing were major activities. Arawaks hunted ducks,
geese, parrots, iguanas, small rodents, and giant tree sloths. Parrots
and a species of mute dog were domesticated. Most fishing, done by hand
along the coast and in rivers, was for molluscs, lobsters, and turtles.
Bigger fish were caught with baskets, spears, hooks, and nets. In some
cases, fish were caught by attaching the hooks of sharpened sticks to a
small sucking fish, called a remora, which fastened itself to
larger fish such as sharks and turtles.
Food was prepared by baking on stones or barbecuing over an open
fire, using peppers, herbs, and spices lavishly for both flavor and
preservation. In some places, beer was brewed from maize. The
descriptions of the first Europeans indicated that the food supply was
sufficient and in general the inhabitants were well fed--until the
increased demand of the new immigrants and the dislocation created by
their imported animals created famine.
The Caribs of the eastern islands were a highly mobile group; they
possessed canoes similar to those of the Arawaks, but they employed them
for more warlike pursuits. Their social organization appeared to be
simpler than that of the Arawaks. They had no elaborate ceremonial ball
courts like those found on the larger islands, but their small, wooden,
frame houses surrounded a central fireplace that might have served as a
ceremonial center. Many of their cultural artifacts--especially those
recovered in Trinidad-- resemble those of the Arawaks. This might be
explained in part by the Carib practice of capturing Arawak women as
brides, who then could have socialized the children along Arawak lines.
The social and political organization of Carib society reflected both
their military inclination and their mobile status. Villages were small,
often consisting of members of an extended family. The leader of the
village, most often the head of the family, supervised the
food-gathering activities, principally fishing, done by the men, and
cultivation, a task for the women. In addition, the leader settled
internal disputes and led raids against neighboring groups. The purpose
of these raids was to obtain wives for the younger males of the village.
Warfare was an important activity for Carib males, and before the
arrival of the Spanish they had a justified reputation as the most
feared warriors of the Caribbean. Using bows, poisoned arrows, javelins
and clubs, the Caribs attacked in long canoes, capturing Arawak women
and, according to Arawak informants, ritualistically cooking and eating
some male captives. There are, however, no records of Caribs eating
humans after the advent of the Europeans, thus casting doubts on the
Arawak tales.
When the Spanish arrived in the Caribbean at the end of the fifteenth
century, the Caribs and Arawaks, like all other frontier peoples, were
undergoing mutual adaptations. The generally more peaceful Arawaks were
becoming more adept at fighting; and, away from the contested frontier,
the Caribs, like those in Trinidad, were spending more time on
agriculture than warfare.
The Caribs and the Arawaks were progressively wiped out by the
after-effects of the conquest, with the peaceful Arawaks suffering the
greater catastrophe. The concentrated populations on Hispaniola, Cuba,
Puerto Rico, and Jamaica declined rapidly, victims of enslavement,
social dislocation, and unfamiliar epidemic diseases. The smaller, more
scattered populations of the smaller eastern Caribbean islands survived
much better physically and epidemiologically. In the seventeenth
century, the Caribs resisted European settlements on Dominica, St.
Lucia, and St. Vincent, destroying the first English colony on St. Lucia
in 1641 and delaying the effective occupation of Dominica and St.
Vincent until the middle of the eighteenth century. Some Caribs resisted
assimilation or acculturation by the Europeans, and a few of their
descendants still live on a reservation in Dominica. Both the Caribs and
Arawaks left indelible influences on the languages, diet, and ways of
life of the twentieth century people who live in the region. Caribbean
food crops, such as peanuts, cashew nuts, potatoes, tomatoes,
pineapples, pumpkins, manioc, and maize, have spread around the world.
The Indians' habit of smoking tobacco has become widespread, and tobacco
has become an important commercial commodity. Arawakan and Cariban words
have permeated the languages of the region: words such as agouti,
avocado, barbecue, bohio (a peasant hut), buccaneer, calpulli
(an urban zone), caney (a thatched hut), canoe, cannibal,
cassava, cay, conuco (a cultivated area), quaqua (a
bus or truck), quajiro (a peasant), guava, hammock, hurricane,
iguana, maize, manatee, and zemi (an icon).
The Impact of the Conquest
The Europeans who invaded and conquered the Caribbean terminated the
internally cohesive world of the native peoples and subordinated the
region and the peoples to the events of a wider world in which their
fortunes were linked with those of Africa, Europe, and the Americas. The
Caribbean peoples were devastated by new epidemic diseases, such as
measles, smallpox, malaria, and dysentery, introduced by the Europeans
and the Africans imported as slaves. Their social and political
organizations were restructured in the name of Christianity. Their
simple lives were regimented by slavery and the demands of
profit-oriented, commercial-minded Europeans. Above all, they were
slowly inundated culturally and demographically by the stream of new
immigrants in the years immediately after the conquest.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - THE EUROPEAN SETTLEMENTS
Caribbean Islands
European settlements in the Caribbean began with Christopher
Columbus. Carrying an elaborate feudal commission that made him
perpetual governor of all lands discovered and gave him a percentage of
all trade conducted, Columbus set sail in September 1492, determined to
find a faster, shorter way to China and Japan. He planned to set up a
trading-post empire, modeled after the successful Portuguese venture
along the West African coast. His aim was to establish direct commercial
relations with the producers of spices and other luxuries of the fabled
East, thereby cutting out the Arab middlemen who had monopolized trade
since capturing Constantinople in 1453. He also planned to link up with
the lost Christians of Abyssinia, who were reputed to have great
quantities of gold--a commodity in great demand in Europe. Finally, as a
good Christian, Columbus wanted to spread Christianity to new peoples.
Columbus, of course, did not find the East. Nevertheless, he called the
peoples he met "Indians," and, because he had sailed west,
referred to the region he found as the "West Indies."
However, dreams of a trading-post empire collapsed in the face of
real Caribbean life. The Indians, although initially hospitable in most
cases, simply did not have gold and trade commodities for the European
market. In all, Columbus made four voyages of exploration between 1492
and 1502, failing to find great quantities of gold, Christians, or the
courts of the fabled khans described by Marco Polo. After 1499, small
amounts of tracer gold were discovered on Hispaniola, but by that time
local challenges to his governorship were mounting, and his demonstrated
lack of administrative skills made matters worse. Even more
disappointing, he returned to Spain in 1502 to find that his extensive
feudal authority in the New World was rapidly being taken away by his
monarchs.
Columbus inadvertently started a small settlement on the north coast
of Hispaniola when his flagship, the Santa Maria, wrecked off
the M�le St-Nicolas on his first voyage. When he returned a year later,
no trace of the settlement appeared--and the former welcome and
hospitality of the Indians had changed to suspicion and fear.
The first proper European settlement in the Caribbean began when
Nicol�s de Ovando, a faithful soldier from western Spain, settled about
2,500 Spanish colonists in eastern Hispaniola in 1502. Unlike Columbus'
earlier settlements, this group was an organized cross-section of
Spanish society brought with the intention of developing the Indies
economically and expanding Spanish political, religious, and
administrative influence. In its religious and military motivation, it
continued the reconquista (reconquest), which had expelled the
Moors from Grenada and the rest of southern Spain.
From this base in Santo Domingo, as the new colony was called, the
Spanish quickly fanned out throughout the Caribbean and onto the
mainland. Jamaica was settled in 1509 and Trinidad the following year.
By 1511 Spanish explorers had established themselves as far as Florida.
However, in the eastern Caribbean, the Caribs resisted the penetration
of Europeans until well into the seventeenth century and succumbed only
in the eighteenth century.
With the conquest of Mexico in 1519 and the subsequent discovery of
gold there, interest in working the gold deposits of the islands
decreased. Moreover, by that time the Indian population of the Caribbean
had dwindled considerably, creating a scarcity of workers for the mines
and pearl fisheries. In 1518 the first African slaves, called ladinos
because they had lived in Spain and spoke the Castilian language, were
introduced to the Caribbean to help mitigate the labor shortage.
The Spanish administrative structure that prevailed for the 132 years
of Spanish monopoly in the Caribbean was simple. At the imperial level
were two central agencies, the Casa de Contrataci�n, or House of Trade,
which licensed all ships sailing to or returning from the Indies and
supervised commerce, and the Consejo de Indias, the royal Advisory
Council, which attended to imperial legislation. At the local level in
the Caribbean were the governors, appointed by the monarchs of Castile,
who supervised local municipal councils. The governors were regulated by
audiencias, or appellate courts. A parallel structure regulated
the religious organizations. Despite the theoretical hierarchy and clear
divisions of authority, in practice each agency reported directly to the
monarch. As set out in the original instructions to Ovando in 1502, the
Spanish New World was to be orthodox and unified under the Roman
Catholic religion and Castilian and Spanish in culture and nationality.
Moors, Jews, recent converts to Roman Catholicism, Protestants, and
gypsies were legally excluded from sailing to the Indies, although this
exclusiveness could not be maintained and was frequently violated.
By the early seventeenth century, Spain's European enemies, no longer
disunited and internally weak, were beginning to breach the perimeters
of Spain's American empire. The French and the English established
trading forts along the St. Lawrence and the Hudson Rivers in North
America. These were followed by permanent settlements on the
mid-Atlantic coast (Jamestown) and in New England (Massachusetts Bay
colony).
Between 1595 and 1620, the English, French, and Dutch made many
unsuccessful attempts to settle along the Guiana coastlands of South
America. The Dutch finally prevailed, with one permanent colony along
the Essequibo River in 1616, and another, in 1624, along the neighboring
Berbice River. As in North America, initial loss of life in the colonies
was discouragingly high. In 1624 the English and French gave up in the
Guianas and jointly created a colony on St. Kitts in the northern
Leeward Islands. At that time, St. Kitts was occupied only by Caribs.
With the Spanish deeply involved in the Thirty Years War in Europe,
conditions were propitious for colonial exploits in what until then had
been reluctantly conceded to be a Spanish domain.
In 1621, the Dutch began to move aggressively against Spanish
territory in the Americas--including Brazil, temporarily under Spanish
control between 1580 and 1640. In the Caribbean, they joined the English
in settling St. Croix in 1625 and then seized the minuscule, unoccupied
islands of Cura�ao, St. Eustatius, St. Martin, and Saba, thereby
expanding their former holdings in the Guianas, as well as those at
Araya and Cumana on the Venezuelan coast.
The English and the French also moved rapidly to take advantage of
Spanish weakness in the Americas and overcommitment in Europe. In 1625,
the English settled Barbados and tried an unsuccessful settlement on
Tobago. They took possession of Nevis in 1628 and Antigua and Montserrat
in 1632. They planted a colony on St. Lucia in 1638, but it was
destroyed within four years by the Caribs. The French, under the
auspices of the Compagnie des Iles d'Amerique, chartered by Cardinal
Richelieu in 1635, successfully settled Martinique and Guadeloupe,
laying the base for later expansion to St. Bartholom�, St. Martin,
Grenada, St. Lucia, and western Hispaniola, which was formally ceded by
Spain in 1697 at the Treaty of Ryswick (signed between France and the
alliance of Spain, the Netherlands, and England, and ending the War of
the Grand Alliance). Meanwhile, an expedition sent out by Oliver
Cromwell (Protector of the English Commonwealth, 1649-58) under Admiral
William Penn (the father of the founder of Pennsylvania) and General
Robert Venables in 1655 seized Jamaica, the first territory captured
from the Spanish. (Trinidad, the only other British colony taken from
the Spanish, fell in 1797 and was ceded in 1802.) At that time Jamaica
had a population of about 3,000, equally divided between Spaniards and
their slaves--the Indian population having been eliminated. Although
Jamaica was a disappointing consolation for the failure to capture
either of the major colonies of Hispaniola or Cuba, the island was
retained at the Treaty of Madrid in 1670, thereby more than doubling the
land area for potential British colonization in the Caribbean. By 1750
Jamaica was the most important of Britian's Caribbean colonies, having
eclipsed Barbados in economic significane.
The first colonists in the Caribbean were trying to recreate their
metropolitan European societies in the region. In this respect, the
goals and the world view of the early colonists in the Caribbean did not
vary significantly from those of the colonists on the North American
mainland. "The Caribbee planters," wrote the historian Richard
Dunn, "began as peasant farmers not unlike the peasant farmers of
Wigston Magna, Leicestershire, or Sudbury, Massachusetts. They
cultivated the same staple crop--tobacco--as their cousins in Virginia
and Maryland. They brought to the tropics the English common law,
English political institutions, the English parish [local administrative
unit], and the English church." These institutions survived for a
very long time, but the social context in which they were introduced was
rapidly altered by time and circumstances. Attempts to recreate
microcosms of Europe were slowly abandoned in favor of a series of
plantation societies using slave labor to produce large quantities of
tropical staples for the European market. In the process of this
transformation, complicated by war and trade, much was changed in the
Caribbean.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - THE COLONIAL PERIOD
Caribbean Islands
Evolution around the middle of the seventeenth century of a sugar
plantation society based on slave labor was an important watershed in
Caribbean history. Introduced by the Dutch when they were expelled from
Brazil in 1640, the sugar plantation system arrived at an opportune time
for the fledgling non-Spanish colonists with their precarious economies.
The English yeoman farming economy based mainly on cultivation of
tobacco was facing a severe crisis. Caribbean tobacco could compete
neither in quality nor in quantity with that produced in the
mid-Atlantic colonies. Because tobacco farming had been basis of the
economy, its end threatened the economic viability of the islands. As a
result, the colonies were losing population to the mainland. Economic
salvation came from what has been called in historical literature the
Caribbean "sugar revolutions," a series of interrelated
changes that altered the entire agriculture, demography, society, and
culture of the Caribbean, thereby transforming the political and
economic importance of the region.
In terms of agriculture, the islands changed from small farms
producing cash crops of tobacco and cotton with the labor of a few
servants and slaves--often indistinguishable--to large plantations
requiring vast expanses of land and enormous capital outlays to create
sugarcane fields and factories. Sugar, which had become increasingly
popular on the European market throughout the seventeenth century,
provided an efficacious balance between bulk and value--a relationship
of great importance in the days of relatively small sailing ships and
distant sea voyages. Hence, the conversion to sugar transformed the
landholding pattern of the islands.
The case of Barbados illustrates the point. In 1640 this island of
430 square kilometers had about 10,000 settlers, predominantly white;
764 of them owned 4 or more hectares of land, and virtually every white
was a landholder. By 1680, when the sugar revolution was underway, the
wealthiest 175 planters owned 54 percent of the land and an equal
proportion of the servants and slaves. More important, Barbados had a
population of about 38,000 African slaves and more than 2,000 English
servants who owned no land. Fortunes, however, depended on access to
land and slaves. Thomas Rous, who arrived in Barbados in 1638, had a
farm of 24 hectares in 1645. By 1680 the Rous family owned 3 sugar
works, 266 hectares of land, and 310 slaves and were counted among the
great planters of the island.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - The Sugar Revolutions and Slavery
Caribbean Islands
The sugar revolutions were both cause and consequence of the
demographic revolution. Sugar production required a greater labor supply
than was available through the importation of European servants and
irregularly supplied African slaves. At first the Dutch supplied the
slaves, as well as the credit, capital, technological expertise, and
marketing arrangements. After the restoration of the English monarch
following the Commonwealth (1642-60), the King and other members of the
royal family invested in the Company of Royal Adventurers, chartered in
1663, to pursue of the lucrative African slave trade. That company was
succeeded by the Royal Africa Company in 1672, but the supply still
failed to meet the demand, and all types of private traders entered the
transatlantic commerce.
Between 1518 and 1870, the transatlantic slave trade supplied the
greatest proportion of the Caribbean population. As sugarcane
cultivation increased and spread from island to island--and to the
neighboring mainland as well--more Africans were brought to replace
those who died rapidly and easily under the rigorous demands of labor on
the plantations, in the sugar factories, and in the mines. Acquiring and
transporting Africans to the New World became a big and extremely
lucrative business. From a modest trickle in the early sixteenth
century, the trade increased to an annual import rate of about 2,000 in
1600, 13,000 in 1700, and 55,000 in 1810. Between 1811 and 1870, about
32,000 slaves per year were imported. As with all trade, the operation
fluctuated widely, affected by regular market factors of supply and
demand as well as the irregular and often unexpected interruptions of
international war.
The eighteenth century represented the apogee of the system, and
before the century had ended, the signs of its demise were clear. About
60 percent of all the Africans who arrived as slaves in the New World
came between 1700 and 1810, the time period during which Jamaica,
Barbados, and the Leeward Islands peaked as sugar producers. Antislavery
societies sprang up in Britain and France, using the secular,
rationalist arguments of the Enlightenment--the intellectual movement
centered in France in the eighteenth century- -to challenge the moral
and legal basis for slavery. A significant moral victory was achieved
when the British Chief Justice, Lord Mansfield, ruled in 1772 that
slavery was illegal in Britain, thereby freeing about 15,000 slaves who
had accompanied their masters there--and abruptly terminating the
practice of black slaves ostentatiously escorting their masters about
the kingdom. In the British Parliament, antislavery voices grew stronger
until eventually a bill to abolish the slave trade passed both houses in
1807. The British, being the major carriers of slaves and having
abolished the trade themselves, energetically set about discouraging
other states from continuing. The abolition of the slave trade was a
blow from which the slave system in the Caribbean could not recover.
Before the slave trade ended, the Caribbean had taken approximately
47 percent of the 10 million African slaves brought to the Americas. Of
this number, about 17 percent came to the British Caribbean. Although
the white populations maintained their superior social positions, they
became a numerical minority in all the islands. In the early nineteenth
century, fewer than 5 percent of the total population of Jamaica,
Grenada, Nevis, St. Vincent, and Tobago was white, fewer than 10 percent
of the population of Anguilla, Montserrat, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, and the
Virgin Islands. Only in the Bahamas, Barbados, and Trinidad was more
than 10 percent of the total population white. By sharp contrast,
Trinidad was the only colony in the British Caribbean to have fewer than
80 percent of its population enslaved. Sugar and slavery gave to the
region a predominantly African population.
This demographic revolution had important social consequences. Rather
than being a relatively homogeneous ethnic group divided into categories
based on economic criteria, Caribbean society had complex overlapping
divisions of class and caste. The three basic divisions were free white
persons, free nonwhite persons, and slaves.
Whites were divided along status lines based on wealth. In the
British colonies these were called "principal whites" and
"poor whites." In reality they formed three ranks. At the top,
forming an elite, were families who owned slaves and successful
plantations. Some of their names became important in the history of one
or more islands, names such as Guy, Modyford, Drax, Sutton, Price,
Bannington, Needham, Tharp, and Beckford in Jamaica; Drax, Hallet,
Littleton, Codrington, and Middleton in Barbados; and Warner, Winthrop,
Pinney, and Jeaffreson in the Leeward Islands. Next in rank came the
merchants, officials, and such professionals as doctors and clergymen,
who were just a shade below the big planters.
At the bottom of the white ranks came the so-called "poor
whites," often given such pejorative names as "red legs"
in Barbados, or "walking buckras" in Jamaica. This group
included small independent farmers, servants, day laborers, and all the
service individuals from policemen to smiths, as well as the various
hangers-on required by the curious "Deficiency Laws." These
were laws designed to retain a minimum number of whites on each
plantation to safeguard against slave revolts. A Jamaica law of 1703
stipulated that there must be one white person for each ten slaves up to
the first twenty slaves and one for each twenty slaves thereafter as
well as one white person for the first sixty head of cattle and one for
each one hundred head after the first sixty head. The law was modified
in 1720, raising the ratios and lowering the fines for noncompliance,
but the planters seemed more prepared to pay the fines for noncompliance
than to recruit and maintain white servants, so the law degenerated to
another simple revenue measure for the state. This was true throughout
the British islands during the eighteenth century.
Regardless of rank, skin color gave each person of European descent a
privileged position within plantation society. The importance of race
and color was a significant variation from the norms of typical European
society and accentuated the divergence between the society "at
home" and that overseas.
Each slave society in the colonies had an intermediate group, called
the "free persons of color," an ambiguous position. Governor
Francis Seaforth of Barbados colorfully expressed this dilemma in 1802:
"There is, however, a third description of people from whom I am
more suspicious of evil than from either the whites or the slaves: these
are the Black and Colored people who are not slaves, and yet whom I
cannot bring myself to call free. I think unappropriated people
would be a more proper denomination for them, for though not the
property of other individuals they do not enjoy the shadow of any civil
right." This group originated in the miscegenation of European
masters and their African slaves. By the nineteenth century, the group
could be divided into blacks who had gained their freedom or were the
descendants of slaves, and the mixed, or mulatto, descendants of the
associations between Europeans and non-Europeans. By the time of the
abolition of slavery in the 1830s, the heterogeneous free nonwhite
population represented about 10 percent of the population of Jamaica, 12
percent of the population of Barbados, and about 20 percent of the
population of Trinidad. A number of these free nonwhites had been free
for generations, if not centuries, and had carved a niche in the local
societies as successful merchants, planters, professionals, and slave
owners.
Throughout the British Caribbean the free nonwhites manifested a
number of common traits. They were predominantly female, largely urban,
and clearly differentiated from the slaves both by law and by custom.
Although adult females outnumbered males, the free nonwhite population
tended to be the most sexually balanced overall and was the only group
that consistently reproduced itself in the British colonies during the
era of the slave trade. Moreover, with the exception of Trinidad, where,
as Bridget Brereton indicates, just as many free nonwhites lived in the
rural parishes as in the towns of Port of Spain, San Fernando, and St.
Joseph, the free nonwhites were strongly urban. After 1809, about 61
percent of all the free nonwhites in Barbados lived in the parish of St.
Michael in the capital city, Bridgetown. More free nonwhites lived in
Kingston, Jamaica, than in all the other parishes combined.
The free nonwhite population faced competition from both ends of the
spectrum. At the lower end of the economic scale they had to compete
with jobbing slaves, who were often working arduously to get enough
money to purchase their freedom and so join the free group. At the upper
end they competed with the artisan, commercial, and semi-skilled service
sector of the lower orders of whites. The whites often used their
political power--or in some cases their access to political power in
Britain--to circumscribe the free nonwhites as much as possible. Laws
distinguishing comportment, dress, and residence, denying nonwhites the
right to practice certain professions, or limiting the material legacy
of individual free nonwhites were common throughout the Caribbean. But
at the time of the abolition of slavery, nonwhites were aggressively
challenging the political hegemony of the whites, and their successes
were very important in the subsequent development of British Caribbean
society.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - The Post-Emancipation Societies
Caribbean Islands
The second great watershed in Caribbean history resulted from the
abolition of slavery in the nineteenth century. In the British Caribbean
this came between 1834, when a law was passed by the British Parliament
to abolish slavery throughout the empire, and 1838, when the
apprenticeship system collapsed prematurely. The apprenticeship system
was designed to ease the transition from slavery to freedom by forcing
the ex-slaves to remain on their plantations for a period of six years.
Its main purpose was to prevent the immediate large-scale abandonment of
estates by the workers, although, with cruel irony, it was the masters
and not the slaves who were awarded compensation for the loss of their
"property." The system proved too cumbersome to administer and
was prematurely terminated in 1838. Barbados and Antigua abolished
slavery without an apprenticeship system in 1834.
Abolition of slavery was difficult for the colonies, which had to
adjust to having a majority of new citizens who could not be denied the
civil rights already grudgingly extended to the few. Extending those
civil rights, then as now, was neither easily nor gracefully achieved
because the political systems had existed for centuries as the narrow
instruments of the small, white, landed elite, largely absentee, whose
members were threatened by the removal of their special trade
preferences. Above all, there were economic difficulties. Sugar prices
were falling, and West Indian producers were facing severe competition
not only from other producers in the British empire--such as India,
South Africa, and Australia--and nonimperial cane sugar producers--such
as Cuba and Brazil--but also from beet sugar producers in Europe and the
United States. Falling prices coincided with rising labor costs,
complicated by the urgent need to regard the ex-slaves as wage laborers
able and willing to bargain for their pay.
To mitigate labor difficulties, the local assemblies were encouraged
to import nominally free laborers from India, China, and Africa under
contracts of indenture. Apart from the condition that they had a legally
defined term of service and were guaranteed a set wage, these Asian
indentured laborers were treated like the African slaves they partially
replaced in the fields and factories. Between 1838 and 1917, nearly half
a million East Indians (from British India) came to work on the British
West Indian sugar plantations, the majority going to the new sugar
producers with fertile lands. Trinidad imported 145,000; Jamaica,
21,500; Grenada, 2,570; St. Vincent, 1,820; and St. Lucia, 1,550.
Between 1853 and 1879, British Guiana imported more than 14,000 Chinese
workers, with a few going to some of the other colonies. Between 1841
and 1867, about 32,000 indentured Africans arrived in the British West
Indies, with the greater number going to Jamaica and British Guiana.
With important British politicians such as Prime Minister William Ewart
Gladstone (1809-98) owning sugar estates in British Guiana, that colony,
directly administered by the crown, assumed great importance in the
Caribbean.
Indentured labor did not resolve the problems of the plantations and
the local governments in the Caribbean during the nineteenth century,
but it enabled the sugar plantations to weather the difficulties of the
transition from slave labor. The new immigrants further pluralized the
culture, the economy, and the societies. The East Indians introduced
rice and boosted the local production of cacao (the bean from which
cocoa is derived) and ground provisions (tubers, fruits, and
vegetables). Although some East Indians eventually converted to
Christianity and intermarried with other ethnic groups, the majority
remained faithful to their original Hindu and Muslim beliefs, adding
temples and mosques to the religious architecture of the territories.
The Chinese moved into local commerce, and, by the beginning of the
twentieth century, the corner Chinese grocery store and the Chinese
restaurant had become commonplace in all the colonies.
Emancipation of the slaves provided the catalyst for the rise of an
energetic, dynamic peasantry throughout the Caribbean. A large
proportion of the ex-slaves settled in free villages, often forming
cooperatives to buy bankrupt or abandoned sugar estates. Where they
lacked the capital, they simply squatted on vacant lands and continued
the cultivation of many of the food crops that the planters and the
colonial government had exported during the days of slavery.
The villages, although largely independent, provided a potential
labor pool that could be attracted to the plantations. The growth of
these free villages immediately after the emancipation of the slaves was
astonishing. In Jamaica, black freeholders increased from 2,014 in 1838
to more than 7,800 in 1840 and more than 50,000 in 1859. In Barbados,
where land was scarcer and prices higher, freeholders of less than 2
hectares each increased from 1,110 in 1844 to 3,537 in 1859. In St.
Vincent, about 8,209 persons built their own homes and bought and
brought under cultivation over 5,000 hectares between 1838 and 1857. In
Antigua, 67 free villages with 5,187 houses and 15,644 inhabitants were
established between 1833 and 1858. The free villages produced new crops
such as coconuts, rice, bananas, arrowroot, honey, and beeswax, as well
as the familiar plantation crops of sugarcane, tobacco, coffee, cacao,
citrus limes, and ground provisions.
Caribbean Islands
The Windward Islands and Barbados
Caribbean Islands
THE WINDWARD ISLANDS consist of Dominica, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and
the Grenadines, and Grenada. The name Windward dates back to
the 1700s, to the time when English ships bound for Jamaica followed the
trade-wind passage, stopping at islands along the way. The islands
constitute a north-south chain in the southern section of the Lesser
Antilles and share a volcanic rock formation. These nations also had
highly similar political and economic systems in the late 1980s. Despite
these parallels, the Windwards were much more heterogeneous than other
Commonwealth Caribbean island groupings. These differences prevented the
establishment in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries of a
common government along the lines found in the Leeward Islands.
A French legacy distinguished the Windward Islands from their
Commonwealth Caribbean neighbors. The French established permanent
settlements on the four islands in the 1600s and controlled them until
the islands were seized by the British in the 1760s. Even after the
British takeover, France continued to compete with Britain for authority
over the Windwards, regaining control over St. Lucia, for example, on
several occasions. France did not relinquish its claim to St. Lucia
until 1815.
The islands varied widely in the degree to which they subsequently
assimilated British culture and mores. The most extensive assimilation
occurred in St. Vincent, where the population easily adopted the English
language and Protestantism. In Grenada, on the other hand, the majority
of the residents remained Roman Catholics even though English became the
sole language of the island. Dominica and St. Lucia offered the greatest
resistance to British influence. A French creole language called patois
continued to be spoken in the late 1980s among much of the rural
population of both islands. Dominicans and St. Lucians were also
overwhelmingly Roman Catholic.
Beginning in the 1830s, the Windward Islands and Tobago ostensibly
were under the authority of the governor of Barbados. In actuality,
however, lieutenant governors on each of the islands exercised
considerable autonomy. In 1875 the governor of Barbados attempted to
implement a British proposal calling for a Windward Islands
confederation. Fearing a loss of political and financial autonomy,
Barbadian planters successfully defeated the measure. In 1885 Barbados
withdrew from the government of the Windward Islands, leaving St. Lucia,
St. Vincent, and Grenada with a nominal governor (Dominica had left
earlier). In 1940 Dominica rejoined the Windwards after being a
reluctant member of the Leeward Islands Federation for the previous
seventy years. The weak Windwards structure lasted until 1956; its
members were absorbed the following year in the ill-fated West Indies
Federation (see The West Indies Federation, 1957-62, ch. 1).
The newly independent nations of the Windward Islands shared common
political and economic patterns. All were constitutional monarchies with
a parliamentary system of government on the Westminster model. St.
Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Grenada each had a bicameral
legislature consisting of an elected House and a non-elective Senate.
The prime minister was the leader of the party that secured a majority
of House seats. The pattern was similar in Dominica except that House
and Senate members were part of a unicameral body. Agriculture was the
leading component of the gross domestic product for each of the islands.
In the case of Grenada, however, tourism had replaced agriculture as the
primary earner of foreign exchange by the mid-1980s. All of the
Windwards islands had high levels of unemployment and emigration.
In the late 1980s, following a tumultuous decade, national security
remained an important consideration for the leaders of the Windward
Islands. The overthrow in 1979 of the Grenadian government and its
replacement by the People's Revolutionary Government (PRG), the
temporary seizure the same year of Union Island in the Grenadines, the
attempted coup in 1981 in Dominica, and the assassination in 1983 of PRG
leader Maurice Bishop had shocked the Windward population. These events
led to the creation of paramilitary Special Service Units within each of
the national police organizations. At the same time, however, leaders
generally continued to oppose the establishment of a regional army,
fearing that such an institution could endanger democracy.
Despite its nineteenth-century ties to the Windward Islands, Barbados
differed from its neighbors in several ways. Barbados lies east of the
Windwards and is characterized by lowlands, plains, and rolling hills
rather than the mountainous terrain of the Windwards. The island also
followed a distinct historical path. Barbados was regarded as the most
British nation in the Commonwealth Caribbean, a reflection undoubtedly
of the uncontested control exercised by the British from 1625 until the
granting of independence in 1966. The economic base was different from
most of the Windward nations also; tourism had replaced agriculture as
the primary foreign exchange earner by the 1970s. Barbados was also
distinguished from its neighbors by the maintenance of a standing army.
Barbados' political structure, however, was identical to that found in
St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Grenada.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - The Leeward Islands
Caribbean Islands
LIKE THE REST OF THE INSULAR CARIBBEAN, the Leeward islands were
discovered and named by the Spanish, only to have their control
contested by the British and French. The term leeward islands
is derived from the course taken by most of the sailing ships that
voyaged from Britain to the Caribbean. Impelled by the trade winds,
these vessels normally encountered Barbados, the island most to
windward, as their first port of call. After progressing through the
islands most to windward, which came to be known as the Windwards, these
ships rounded off their voyages with the islands most to
leeward--Montserrat, Antigua, Barbuda, St. Christopher (hereafter, St.
Kitts), Nevis, Anguilla, and the Virgin Islands, among others.
Historically, the Leewards and Windwards have followed somewhat
divergent paths despite their common colonial bond. The Leewards were
settled earlier and were not, with the possible exception of St. Kitts,
as rigorously disputed over as were the Windwards. Consequently, the
period of uninterrupted British rule was longer in the Leewards. One
legacy of this is the absence of Frenchinfluenced creole languages among
the inhabitants of the Leewards. Despite colloquial forms of expression,
English is the common tongue. In regard to religion, Roman Catholicism
did not take root in the Leewards as it did in the Windwards. A number
of Protestant denominations, predominantly the Anglican, Methodist, and
Moravian churches, account for most of the Leewards faithful.
As a political entity, the Leewards experienced two extended periods
of federation during the colonial period. The first of these, the
Leeward Caribbee Islands Government, was established in 1671 and united
the islands under the direction of a British governor. For a brief
period in the early nineteenth century (1806- 32), this grouping was
divided into two separate governments. In 1871 Dominica, the British
Virgin Islands, Montserrat, St. KittsNevis -Anguilla, and Antigua (with
Barbuda and Redonda) became the Leeward Islands Federation. Except for
Dominica, which withdrew in 1940, these islands remained joined until
the British dissolved the federation in 1956. Following a brief period
in which they were administered as separate colonies, the former members
of the Leeward Islands Federation were absorbed into the West Indies
Federation in 1958 (see The West Indies Federation, 1958-62, ch. 1). The
islands assumed associated statehood (see Glossary) in 1967, five years
after the dissolution of the West Indies Federation. By the end of 1983,
all but the dependencies (Anguilla, Montserrat, and the British Virgin
Islands) had acquired full independence.
One phenomenon that binds the two island groupings together in a
political and perhaps sociological and even psychological sense is the
"small-island complex." Caribbean scholar Gordon K. Lewis has
blamed this mind-set, which is a general feeling of inferiority suffered
by the residents of small islands in relation to the residents of larger
islands such as Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago, for the failure of the
West Indies Federation and other even less successful efforts at
unification. Others have noted the "push and pull" effect on
migration from the smaller islands to the larger islands, although these
patterns are probably best examined and explained from an economic
rather than a sociologicalpsychological point of view.
The Leewards generally have shared a similar pattern of economic
development. The plantation system, characterized by production of one
or possibly two major export products on land often held by absentee
owners, has been another legacy of the enduring but largely static and
unresponsive British control of the islands. What the system produced
for Britain was sugar. Its byproducts --labor strife, migration,
landlessness, and poverty--were bequeathed to the workers. Thus it was
that labor unions became the first vehicles for mass-based political
expression in the islands. The political parties that grew out of
unionism came to dominate government in the Leewards, especially after
the granting of universal adult suffrage in 1951. Although the power of
the laborbased parties was eventually diminished by factionalism and the
rise of middle-class opposition groups (especially in St. Kitts and
Nevis), their political influence has endured.
One notable political aspect of the Leewards is the high incidence of
multi-island states--Antigua and Barbuda, St. KittsNevis -Anguilla, and
the British Virgin Islands. Such associations were encouraged by the
British, who thought to enhance the economic and political viability of
these small states by broadening their productive and electoral bases.
The British did not sufficiently account for the small-island complex,
however, and the seemingly inherent resentment it generated among the
residents of the smaller islands. Thus, the grouping of unequal partners
promoted unrest more than unity, particularly in the case of Anguilla.
Eventually, a more positive approach to the question of multi-island
federation, based on the concept of enhanced and assured autonomy for
the smaller island, was achieved in Antigua and Barbuda and St. Kitts
and Nevis.
Caribbean Islands
Trinidad and Tobago - The Northern Islands
Caribbean Islands
THE NORTHERN ISLANDS is a term of convenience used in this study to
refer to the independent Commonwealth of the Bahamas and the two British
dependent territories, the Cayman Islands and the Turks and Caicos
Islands. All three are located in the northern Caribbean Basin. Both the
Bahamas and the Turks and Caicos Islands form part of the Bahamas
archipelago, which extends 80 kilometers southeast of Florida to
approximately 150 kilometers north of Haiti and the Dominican Republic.
The Cayman Islands lie approximately 150 kilometers south of Cuba and
290 kilometers northwest of Jamaica.
All three island groupings share a similar historical development.
Christopher Columbus most likely made his first landfall in the New
World on a Bahamian island, although exactly where has been debated for
years. He discovered the Cayman Islands on his third voyage in 1503.
Although Ponce de Leon is said to have discovered the Turks and Caicos
in 1512, some historians still speculate that Columbus landed on one of
these islands during his first voyage in 1492. In mid-1987 preparations
were underway for the celebration of the quincentenary of the discovery
of the New World; replicas of Columbus's ships were being constructed in
Spain to recreate the historic transatlantic voyage in 1992. The ships
were scheduled to drop anchor in the Bahamas on October 12 of that year,
focusing world attention on the small Caribbean nation.
The islands shared common political linkages at various times in the
nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The Turks and Caicos formed part of
the Bahamas in the first half of the nineteenth century. By the second
half of the nineteenth century, both the Turks and Caicos and the
Caymans were Jamaican dependencies and remained so until Jamaican
independence in 1962. At that time, both sets of islands became separate
British colonies, a status that they retained as of the late 1980s. The
Bahamas, which became a British colony in the mid-seventeenth century,
attained independence as a sovereign nation in 1973. In the late 1980s,
all three island groupings maintained membership in the British
Commonwealth of Nations (see Appendix B).
The Bahamas dwarfs both the Caymans and the Turks and Caicos in area,
population, and gross domestic product (GDP--see Glossary). Despite
differences, these three societies shared several common social and
economic characteristics in the late 1980s. The populations of all three
groupings had a strong African heritage. Tourism and financial services
were major elements of the domestic economies in all three island
groupings. The Bahamian and Caymanian economies were particularly
developed in these two sectors, resulting in relatively high per capita
income for the region and for the developing world in general. The
economy of the Turks and Caicos lacked the necessary infrastructure to
exploit these activities fully; however, it was steadily establishing
important tourist and financial service sectors in the mid-1980s with
the help of British investments.
Finally, all three island groupings were affected in the 1980s by
drug trafficking. Both the Bahamas and the Turks and Caicos became
transit points for traffickers from South America; in addition, both
societies experienced severe social and political crises resulting from
drug-related corruption. Traffickers were also believed to have
laundered funds in Caymanian banks. This major international problem was
being addressed throughout the area under pressure and with assistance
from the United States.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - POLITICAL TRADITIONS
Caribbean Islands
The political traditions of the Commonwealth Caribbean islands
reflect the diverse ways in which they were brought into the British
Empire and administered, as well as the dominant political views in
London at the time of their incorporation. Some of these traditions can
still be observed in the operation of contemporary politics in the
region. Three patterns emerged: one for colonies settled or acquired
before the eighteenth century; another for colonies taken during the
Seven Years War (1756-63) and ceded by France in 1784; and a third for
colonies conquered in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth
centuries.
The first group--Barbados, the Bahamas, the Leeward Islands, and
Jamaica--developed during the early attempts to found colonies. Like the
mainland North American colonies (and Bermuda), these territories had
representative assemblies based on the bicameral system of the mother
country. Each colony had a governor who represented the monarch, an
appointed upper house, and an elected lower house. The electoral
franchise, however, was extremely restricted, being vested in a few
wealthy male property holders. Power was divided between the governor,
who executed the laws, and the assembly, which made them. However, the
assembly retained the right to pass all money bills--including the pay
for the governor-- and so used this right to obstruct legislation or
simply control new officials.
These older colonies also had an effective system of local government
based on parish vestries. The vestries were elected annually by the
freeholders and met frequently to levy local revenues for the
maintenance of the poor, the support of the clergy, the construction of
roads, and other local business, such as the licensing of teachers.
Dominica, Grenada, St. Vincent, the Grenadines, Tobago, and St. Lucia
were brought into the British Empire between 1763 and 1814. Grenada and
the Grenadines were captured during the Seven Years War and ceded by
France at the end of the war. St. Vincent came as part of the settlement
of 1783 between France and Britain. Tobago, Dominica, and St. Lucia, won
during the Napoleonic Wars, were ceded in 1803, 1805, and 1814,
respectively. They were referred to as "ceded islands" and
also had assemblies, which sometimes functioned like those in the older
territories. However, the small size of the free landholding population
in these islands vitiated the functions of these assemblies and
precluded development of a viable system of local government such as had
developed in Jamaica and Barbados. The British administered these
islands in two units: the British Leeward Islands (St. Kitts, Nevis,
Barbuda, Anguilla, Antigua, Montserrat, the British Virgin Islands, and
also Dominica from 1871 to 1940) and the British Windward Islands (St.
Lucia, St. Vincent, the Grenadines, and Grenada as well as Dominica
between 1940 and 1956).
When Trinidad and St. Lucia were brought into the empire in 1797 and
1814, respectively, the British government, cognizant of the difficulty
that it had had with the various local planters' assemblies, vested the
royal governors with virtually autocratic powers. This system of direct
British rule through appointed officials rather than elected
representatives was known as "crown colony" government. At the
same time, the British retained the previous Spanish, French, and Dutch
forms of government, gradually altering them through time. No sustained
attempt was made to foster local government in these newer colonies,
although the leading cities--Port of Spain and Castries--had municipal
councils. Perhaps as a result, a strong grass-roots democracy failed to
develop early in the latter territories.
Colonial acquisition and administration were not neatly and easily
accomplished. St. Lucia, having changed possession fourteen times, was
administered as a British crown colony between 1814 and 1871, when it
joined the Leeward Islands group. Tobago changed imperial masters more
than a dozen times before finally being acquired by Britain in 1802--a
position ratified by the French in 1814. It experienced many forms of
administration before being confirmed as a ward of Trinidad in 1889. The
Bahamas, irregularly colonized by the British beginning in 1629, had a
representative assembly in 1728, but settled into a dull routine as a
minor crown colony until the granting of complete internal
self-government in January 1964. The British Virgin Islands, annexed in
1672, entered the sugar revolution with the rest of the region, but
declined economically during the nineteenth century. Between 1871 and
1956, they formed part of the British Leeward Islands administration,
and, having opted not to join the West Indies Federation, became crown
colonies (see the West Indies Federation, 1958-62, this ch., and Postwar
Federation Attempts, ch. 7). The Cayman Islands, erratically settled by
the British, until 1848 were administered by the Bahamas. After a short
period of legislative government (1848- 63), they reverted to the
administration of Jamaica until 1962, when they became a crown colony.
Emancipation of the slaves placed great strains on the representation
system. Designed originally for colonies of British settlers, the
assemblies no longer represented the majority of citizens but merely a
small minority of the oligarchy. Sometimes these oligarchies were too
small to provide the necessary administrative apparatus, which explains
the shifting nature of colonial government in some of the smaller
islands, and the constant quest of the British government to reduce
government costs. The power of the purse, once astutely wielded by the
planter class, declined along with the value of the export economy,
denying to the assemblies their former intimidating power over
governors. The British government had always been uneasy about the
colonial representative assemblies, especially given the increasing
number of non-Europeans in the population. In Jamaica, just before the
collapse of the system in 1865, the assembly had 49 members representing
28 constituencies elected by 1,457 voters. Only 1,903 registered voters
existed in a population of 400,000--nearly half of whom were adult
males.
The Morant Bay Rebellion of October 1865 brought about the end of the
old representative assemblies. The "rebellion" was really a
protest of rural black peasants in the southeastern parish of St.
Thomas. The conflict had unmistakable racial and religious overtones,
pitting George William Gordon and Paul Bogle, who were black Baptists,
against the custos (the senior vestryman), a German immigrant
named Baron Maximilian von Ketelholdt; the rector of the established
church, the Reverend S.H. Cooke; and the governor of the island, Edward
John Frye, a hostile incompetent with limited intelligence but long
service in minor colonial posts. The original demonstrators were
protesting what they believed to be unjust arrests at the courthouse in
Morant Bay when, failing to obey an order to disperse, they were fired
on by the militia, and seven protesters were killed. The crowd then
rioted, burning the courthouse and killing fourteen vestrymen, one of
whom was black. Bogle and Gordon, arrested in Kingston, were tried by
court-martial in Morant Bay and hanged. (In 1965 the Jamaican
government--an independent and representative entity--declared the two
to be its first "national heroes.") Altogether, Governor Eyre
ordered nearly 500 peasants executed, 600 brutally flogged, and 1,000
houses burned by the troops and the Maroons, descendants of former
runaway slaves with whom the government had a legal treaty. In December
the Jamaica Assembly abolished itself, making way for crown colony
government. The act was the final gesture of the old planter oligarchy,
symbolizing that it did not wish to share political power in a
democratic way with the new groups.
Crown colony rule was soon established in other colonies. In the
constitutional reorganization of the later nineteenth century, only
Barbados managed to retain its representative assembly. Jamaica and the
Windward Islands joined Trinidad as colonies fully administered by the
crown while the Leeward Islands experimented with a federal system. With
periodic adjustments, crown colony government endured until the middle
of the twentieth century. Despite its paternalistic rhetoric, and many
practical reforms in the social, educational, and economic arena, it
retarded political development in the West Indies by consistently
denying the legitimacy of political organizations while elevating the
opinions of selected individuals. By so doing, it narrowed rather than
broadened the social base of political power.
The limited political opportunities offered by service in the various
municipal councils and parish vestries emphasized the inadequacies of
the system of appointed councils in which social considerations overrode
merit as the primary basis for selection. Appointed members had no
political constituency--the basis on which they were chosen--and
therefore no responsibility to the majority of people. Because there
were no elected assemblies to represent the islands' interests,
opposition to the crown colony system of government came more often from
the local level alone.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS, 1800-1960
Caribbean Islands
Education
Before the middle of the nineteenth century, education throughout the
British Caribbean consisted of three types: education abroad on private
initiative; education in the islands in exclusive schools designed for
local whites lacking the resources for a foreign education; and
education for the academically able of the intermediate group of
nonwhites.
The wealthy planters generally sent their children abroad, mainly to
Britain, but a surprisingly large number went to study in British North
America. As early as 1720, Judah Morris, a Jew born in Jamaica, was a
lecturer in Hebrew at Harvard College. Alexander Hamilton, born in Nevis
in 1755, attended King's College (later Columbia University), where his
political tracts attracted the attention of George Washington. Other
students attended such colleges as the College of William and Mary in
Virginia and the College of Philadelphia.
Indigent whites attended local grammar schools founded by charitable
bequests in the eighteenth century, such as Codrington College and
Harrison College in Barbados and Wolmer's, Rusea's, Beckford and
Smith's, and Manning's schools in Jamaica.
Slaves and their offspring were given little more than religious
instruction. Indeed, in 1797 a law in Barbados made it illegal to teach
reading and writing to slaves. In the early nineteenth century, the
endowment from the Mico Trust--originally established in 1670 to redeem
Christian slaves in the Barbary States of North Africa--opened a series
of schools for blacks and free nonwhite pupils throughout the Caribbean
and three teachertraining colleges--Mico in Antigua and Jamaica and
Codrington in Barbados.
After 1870 there was a mini-revolution in public education throughout
the Caribbean. This coincided with the establishment of free compulsory
public elementary education in Britain and in individual states of the
United States. A system of free public primary education and limited
secondary education became generally available in every territory, and
an organized system of teacher training and examinations was
established.
Nevertheless, the main thrust of public education in the nineteenth
and early twentieth centuries did not come from the local government,
but rather, from the religious community. Competing Protestant
denominations--the Church of England, the Baptists, the Moravians, the
Wesleyans, and the Presbyterians--and the Jesuits operated a vast system
of elementary and secondary schools. At the end of the nineteenth
century, the churches monopolized elementary education in Jamaica and
Barbados and ran a majority of the primary schools in Trinidad, Grenada,
and Antigua. The most outstanding secondary schools--St. George's
College, Kingston College, Jamaica College, Calabar High School, and the
York Castle High School in Jamaica; Harrison College, Codrington
College, the Lodge School, and the Queens College in Barbados; and
Queen's College, St. Mary's, and Naparima in Trinidad--as well as the
principal grammar schools in the Bahamas, Antigua, St. Kitts, and
Grenada owe their origins to the religious denominations. Each territory
had a board of education, which supervised both government and religious
schools. Government assistance slowly increased until by the middle of
the twentieth century the state eventually gained control over all forms
of education. Although far from perfect--most colonies still spent more
on prisons than on schools--public education fired the ambitions of the
urban poor.
Based on the British system--even to the use of British textbooks and
examinations--the colonial Caribbean educational system was never
modified to local circumstances. Nevertheless, it created a cadre of
leaders throughout the region whose strong sense of local identity and
acute knowledge of British political institutions served the region well
in the twentieth century.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - Precursors of Independence
Caribbean Islands
Education produced two groups in the British West Indies. The first
identified closely with the British system--especially with the Fabian
Society of radical thinkers within the newly formed British Labour
Party--and sought political reforms through conventional parliamentary
channels. The most ardent representatives of this group were individuals
in the local legislatures such as Sandy Cox and J.A.G. Smith in Jamaica,
T. Albert Marryshow in Grenada, and Andrew A. Cipriani in Trinidad.
Although they did not depend on the masses for political support
(because the masses did not yet have the vote), they knew how to draw
the masses into political action. They joined the municipal and parish
councils in urging a reduction in the privileges of the old planter
classes and more local representation in local affairs. They also
advocated legal recognition of the fledgling trade union movement in the
Caribbean.
The second group, inspired by the idea of a spiritual return to
Africa, was more populist and more independent than the first group.
From this group came individuals such as John J. Thomas (an articulate
socio-linguist), Claude MacKay, H.S. Williams (founder of the
Pan-African Association in London in 1897), George Padmore (the gray
eminence of Ghanaian leader, Kwame Nkrumah), Richard B. Moore, W.A.
Domingo, and Marcus Mosiah Garvey, founder of the United Negro
Improvement Association in Jamaica (1914) and Harlem (1916). Thomas,
Williams, and Padmore came from Trinidad; MacKay, Garvey, and Domingo,
from Jamaica; and Moore, from Barbados.
In addition to these organizers, there were a number of individuals
from all the colonies who had served abroad in World War I in the West
India Regiments of the British Army. Some of these individuals were of
African birth, and after the war were given land and pensions in several
West Indian territories, where they formed the nucleus of an early
pan-Caribbean movement. Their war experiences left them critical of the
British government and British society, and they tended to agitate for
political reforms to bring self-government to the Caribbean colonies.
The political agitation of these groups laid the groundwork for the
generation of politicians who later dismantled colonialism in the
British Caribbean: Norman Manley and Alexander Bustamante in Jamaica;
Robert Bradshaw in St. Kitts; Vere Bird, Sr., in Antigua; Eric Matthew
Gairy in Grenada; Grantley Adams in Barbados; and Uriah Butler, Albert
Gomes, and Eric Williams in Trinidad.
The political agitation that periodically enveloped the British
Caribbean had roots in its dismal economic situation. The colonial
government had placed its faith in sugar and large plantations, but
sugar was not doing well economically. Increased productivity in
Jamaica, Barbados, and Trinidad could not mask the difficulties of price
and marketing. Unemployment was rife. Wages on sugar estates were
one-quarter to one-half of those paid on Cuban sugar estates during the
same period. Many of the smaller islands had abandoned sugar production
altogether. Not surprisingly, large numbers of West Indians emigrated
for economic reasons to Venezuela, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua,
Guatemala, Cuba, Mexico, and the United States. When economic
opportunities abroad ended with the Great Depression, the discontent of
the returning migrants and frustrated laborers erupted into violence
throughout the region from 1935 to 1937.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - POLITICAL INDEPENDENCE
Caribbean Islands
Changes in the Social Base of Political Power
Although the riots of the 1930s brought swift political changes, the
conditions that precipitated the explosion had been building slowly for
more than half a century. The long period of direct and modified crown
colony government after the Morant Bay disturbances produced two
political patterns throughout the British Antilles. The first, to which
allusion has already been made, was based on strong executive power in
the hands of a governor. Whereas this undoubtedly made administration
easier for governors, it had negative effects on the social basis of
political power and political development. As Carl Campbell so
eloquently put it, "[Crown colony government] sought constantly to
increase the area of government and decrease the area of politics."
Harris, was, of course, describing the situation in Trinidad in the
middle of the nineteenth century, but his portrayal would have been apt
for any British colony at the beginning of the twentieth. Colonial
governors were not inhibited by the threat of legislative council vetoes
of their decisions nor by the type of obstructionism that had
characterized the assemblies before 1865. Colonial governors were
responsible only to the Secretary of State for the Colonies in London.
By appointing to the legislature members whose views were compatible
with the goals of empire, the governors reduced the range of experience
and advice available to them. They were not interested in local opinion
and local advice. If they had been, they would not have stifled public
opinion by consistently discouraging political organizations and
insisting that only individuals could express their views.
Not surprisingly, the dominant views of the local governments were
those of the planter classes, especially the older, more established
planter classes. Nevertheless, by the end of the nineteenth century, the
planter class not only was divided but also was being challenged by the
popular classes. This challenge created a series of recurring political
crises among the governors, the legislatures, and the Colonial Office,
leading to some modest reforms in the system in the early twentieth
century.
After emancipation, dissolution of the old caste structure of the
Caribbean slave society, which was based on the confusing divisions of
race, occupation, and status, gave rise to a new, more complex class
society. Class divisions within the declining castes generated new
groups and produced new tensions. For example, the planter class, which
had never been homogeneous either within territories or across the
British colonies, became even more variegated.
In the nineteenth century a new petty bourgeois class emerged
consisting of merchants, successful estate owners without the ancestry
and traditions of the older landed class, members of the professions,
and an expanding managerial sector. This class was far more
heterogeneous than the class it was surreptitiously displacing in
economic and political affairs. In Jamaica, a very large number of Jews
were given the franchise and participated actively in politics.
Remarkably, Jews obtained equality in Jamaica and sat in the House of
Assembly long before they secured such privileges in Britain. In
Barbados, a small number of free nonwhites and Jews moved up, but the
resilience of the planter aristocracy inhibited the opening of
opportunities found elsewhere. In Trinidad, the white elites included
English, French, Scots, and Spanish, and the religious division along
Catholic and Protestant lines was as great as along political and social
lines. Although governors might prefer the older planter families,
especially those of English ancestry, the new reality was inescapable,
and gradually the appointments to high political office reflected the
social arrival of these new men. They tended to be politically
conservative, but theirs was a less rigid conservatism than had
prevailed for centuries in the Caribbean.
Although the small, predominantly planter and merchant elites
retained political control until the 1940s, increasing social and
political democratization of the Caribbean societies occurred. This
democratization derived from four sources: economic diversification,
which opened up economic opportunities; the expanded educational system,
which produced a new professional class; the dynamic expansion of
organized religion; and the rise of labor unions. Although not of equal
weight, all these forces contributed to the formation of the strong
tradition of democratic government that has characterized the British
Caribbean during the twentieth century.
Between 1880 and 1937, expanded economic opportunities helped create
a new, broader-based middle class throughout the British Caribbean. Much
of this middle class was non-European--formerly from the free nonwhite
community of the days of slavery, reinforced by the more industrious
East Indians and other new immigrant groups of the later nineteenth
century. Thus, the black and colored middle class has as long
antecedents in the Caribbean as the white class. This class expanded
significantly during the post-slavery period.
The lower ranks of the civil service had always provided an opening
for nonwhite talent because in a typical colony sufficient Europeans
could not be found to fill all vacancies. In the larger islands local
groups sufficed. In the other areas the lower civil servants were
intercolonial immigrants. For example, the police force of Trinidad was
composed mainly of immigrants from Barbados although the senior officers
were always European. Bridget Brereton points out that in 1892 only 47
of 506 policemen in Trinidad were local (7.8 percent), compared with 292
from Barbados (57.7 percent) and 137 from the other islands (27
percent).
New exports, such as rice, bananas, limes, cacao, nutmeg, and
arrowroot, provided the means for a few people to join the middle
economic classes and for their offspring to rise even higher. Rice
cultivation, although primarily a peasant activity in Trinidad, also
helped propel a number of its black, East Indian, and Chinese producers
into the ranks of the middle class. Wealth, of course, was not enough to
endow middle-class status, but it often facilitated the upward social
mobility of the sons of peasants, who with the requisite education could
aspire to full status.
Education was the great social elevator of the British Caribbean
masses. From the middle of the nineteenth century, public education,
expanded rapidly. A primary education combined with some knowledge of
languages was useful in commercial concerns because most of the British
Caribbean states conducted much of their commerce with neighboring
Spanish-speaking countries. A secondary education was helpful in getting
into the lower ranks of the bureaucracy and essential for entering the
professions. A system of scholarships enabled lower-class children with
ability to move into secondary schools and into the professions. The
number was never large, but the stream was constant, and the competition
for scholarships was fierce. Studying for these scholarships was more
than an individual effort--it was a family enterprise. Moreover, by the
early decades of the twentieth century, this process of academic
selection and rigorous preparation for the British examinations--uniform
for both British and colonial students--was controlled by predominantly
black schoolmasters, the foundation of the emerging "certificated
masses."
As Guyanese political activist and historian Walter Rodney wrote,
"The rise of the middle class can only be effectively chronicled
and analyzed in relationship to the schools... The position of
headmaster of a primary school must be viewed as constituting the
cornerstone of the black and brown middle class." Eric Williams, a
distinguished product of the system, wrote, "If there was a
difference between the English public school and its Trinidadian
imitation, it was this, that the Trinidad school provided a more
thorough preparation for the university than the average English school,
partly because the students stayed to the age of twenty rather than
eighteen and took a higher examination, partly also because it was not
even the cream of the crop, but the top individual from Trinidad who
found himself competing with a large number of English students of
varying ability." The fact that village primary school headmasters
were also lay preachers and intellectual and quasi-legal arbiters of the
community increased their importance both socially and politically.
The churches became important in molding the intellect and the
political sophistication of the masses beginning in the nineteenth
century. In the 1980s, churches continued to play an important role in
the Caribbean. Even more interesting, the churches have managed to be
both politically revolutionary and conservative, avant garde and
reactionary, depending both on the issues involved and the denomination.
Whereas the mainstream churches--mainly Anglican and Roman
Catholic--accompanied the expansion of imperialism with the expressed
desire of converting "the heathens," their close identity with
the established order was a severe handicap to their effective
incorporation of the lower orders of society. They were especially
ineffective with the Hindus and Muslims from India. As a result, what
early religious conversion took place was most effectively accomplished
by the so-called nonconformist groups--Baptists, Methodists, Moravians,
Presbyterians, and Quakers. These essentially evangelical sects
originated in the metropolitan countries with a mass, or working class,
urban clientele in mind. Their strongest converts were among the poorer
classes. In the Caribbean they were faced with a rather anomalous
situation: the hostility or indifference of the planters and the
established churches and no equivalent class structure. They had either
to work among the slaves and free nonwhites or change their clientele.
They chose the former course and so came into direct conflict with the
local elites. Nonconformist missionaries, white and nonwhite, were some
of the unsung heroes in the struggle for the disintegration of the
Caribbean slave systems.
The nonconformist churches enjoyed phenomenal success among the
nonwhites until the late nineteenth century, but they paid a price.
Their practice and their preaching became syncretized with the rival
Afro-Caribbean religions such as Kumina and Myal. When social practice
blocked the upward mobility of nonwhite members within the hierarchy of
the churches, they flocked to form their own congregations, much as
occurred in the United States. Some of these congregations moved into a
succession of charismatic religions beginning with the rise of Pocomania
in the 1880s, Bedwardism in the early twentieth century, and
Rastafarianism (see Glossary) in the 1930s. All of these religions
espoused trances, public confessions, dreams, spirit possession, and
exotic dancing. The churches provided experience in mass mobilization
and grass-roots organization. More important, they provided the
psychological support for the black masses and gave them comfort and a
self- confidence rare among those of their color, class, and condition.
Politicians such as Marcus Garvey successfully tapped this popular
religious tradition for support.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - Labor Organizations
Caribbean Islands
Political experience emerged directly from the difficult growth of
labor organizations throughout the Caribbean. Trade unionization derived
from the plethora of mutual aid and benevolent societies that existed
from the period of slavery among the Afro-Caribbean population. Not
having the vote or a representative in power, the lower classes used
these societies for their mutual social and economic assistance. To
obtain political leverage, the working and employed classes had only two
recourses: the general strike and the riot.
From time to time some of these strikes were widespread enough to
bring the plight of the masses to the attention of the Colonial Office
and forced significant changes in the constitutional order. Such was the
case with the so-called Water Riots of Trinidad in 1903, which began as
middle-class dissatisfaction over the colonial government's attempt to
install water meters and reduce wastage. The municipal Ratepayers
Association, a solidly middle-class organization, appealed to the
working and unemployed classes of the city of Port of Spain. An excited
mob assembled outside the legislative council's office, resulting in an
altercation in which sixteen people were killed and forty-three injured
by reckless police shooting, and the office of the legislature was
burned to the ground. After the usual official inquiry, the Colonial
Office gradually agreed to the insistent demands of a number of
middleand working-class organizations for the restoration of an elected
city council which was put in place between 1914 and 1918.
Another such riot occurred in Demerara, British Guiana, in 1905.
Starting as a localized dispute over wages by some stevedores in
Georgetown, it quickly spread to sugarfield workers, factory workers,
domestics, bakers, and porters, engulfing an ever-widening area beyond
the city limits. The causes of the disturbance were essentially
economic, and the workers--as opposed to their middleclass
sympathizers--lacked any organizational structure. Nevertheless, the
governor of the colony called out the military forces to put down the
disturbances, causing seven deaths and a score of serious injuries.
Although the riots failed to achieve their economic goals, for a few
days they brought together a great number of the middle and lower
classes. The middle-class leadership of some elements of the working
classes which resulted gave some impetus to the development of a trade
union movement. The coincidence of these riots throughout the British
Caribbean created an impression in Britain that the political
administration of the colonies required greater attention--an impression
reinforced with each commission report issued thereafter.
Between 1880 and 1920, the Caribbean witnessed a proliferation of
organizations, despite the authorities' marked coolness to them. A
number represented middle-class workers such as teachers, banana
growers, coconut growers, cacao farmers, cane farmers, rice farmers,
lime growers, and arrowroot growers. Sometimes, as in the case of the
Ratepayers Association in Trinidad, they had overtly middle-class
political aspirations: a widening of the political franchise to allow
more of their members access to political office. However, more and more
workers were forming unions and agitating for improvements in their
wages and working conditions. Furthermore, as in the cases of the 1905
riots, the two sets of organizations worked in concert--although the
martyrs to the cause were singularly from the working and unemployed
classes. One reason why the two sets of organizations--middle class and
working class-- could work together was their common belief that
political reform of the unjust and anachronistic colonial administrative
system was the major element needed to achieve their divergent goals.
They realized that historically the governors had worked with a small
and unrepresentative segment of the old planter class serving their
narrow economic ends. To the middle classes and the workers--and to a
certain extent the masses of urban unemployed--social and economic
justice would be possible only if they secured control of the political
machinery, and there were only two ways to gain that control: through
persuasion or by force.
To a great degree, this conviction still exists among the populations
of the Caribbean. It was given further authenticity when the British
Labour Party, especially the Fabian wing of the party, expressed
sympathy with this view. But the Fabians did more. They actively sought
to guide these fledgling political associations along a path of
"responsible reform," thereby hoping to avert revolutionary
changes. After World War I, the Fabians grew more influential--as did
the British Labour Party--in British politics. The experience of both
the Boer War and World War I strengthened the anti-imperialists within
Britain and weakened Britain's faith in its ability to rule far-flung
colonies of diverse peoples. There was even less enthusiasm for colonial
domination when the administrative costs exceeded the economic returns.
The result of this ambivalence about empire was a sincere attempt to
rule constitutionally and openly. British critics of colonial rule
expressed their opinions freely, and even the government reports (Blue
Books) produced annually on each colony detailed shortcomings of
bureaucrats and policies. Nevertheless, talking about West Indian
problems was not the same as doing something about them, and by the
1930s, it was clear that British colonial policy was intellectually
bankrupt.
Throughout the 1920s and the 1930s, British labor unions had sought
to guide and encourage formation of West Indian affiliates. As a result,
unionization was common throughout the region, with many of the unions
formally or informally affiliated with the British Trade Union Congress.
However, Fabian tutelage and reformist policies appeared to have failed
when workers broke out in spontaneous demonstrations throughout the
region, beginning in St. Kitts in 1935 and culminating with Jamaica (and
British Guiana) in 1938. A hastily dispatched Royal Commission,
dominated by Fabians and chaired by Lord Moyne (hence called the Moyne
Commission), toured the region and reported on the dismal conditions,
making strong recommendations for significant political reform. The
Moyne Commission noted as causes of the riots increased politicization
of workers in the region, deriving from the war experiences of West
Indian soldiers, the spread of elementary education, and the influence
of industrial labor unrest in the United States. After the riots, the
reforms sought by the union of the middle classes and the workers were
formalized. In 1940 the British Parliament passed the Colonial
Development Welfare Act, the first foreign assistance program legislated
specifically for the islands. The British government also extended the
franchise to all adults over the age of twenty-one and set about
building the apparatus for modified self-government with greater local
participation.
Jamaica held its first general election under universal adult
suffrage in 1944, and the other territories followed soon thereafter.
The alliance of professionals and labor leaders easily captured the
state apparatus from the old combination of planters and bureaucrats.
Thus, in most colonies a very close bond developed between the political
parties and the workers' unions. In Jamaica, the Jamaica Labour Party
drew its basic support from the Bustamante Industrial Trades Unions. Its
rival, the People's National Party, was at first affiliated with the
Trades Union Council, and after the purge of the radicals in 1951,
created the National Workers' Union--the popular base that catapulted
Michael Manley to political eminence in 1972 (see Historical Setting,
ch. 2). In Barbados, the Barbados Labour Party depended in the early
days on the mass base of the members of the Barbados Workers' Union.
Likewise, labor unions formed the catalyst for the successful political
parties of Vere Bird in Antigua, Robert Bradshaw in St. Kitts, and Eric
Gairy in Grenada (see Government and Politics on individual countries,
ch. 4 and ch. 5). The notable exception was Eric Williams in Trinidad.
His Peoples' National Movement, established in 1956, succeeded despite a
constant struggle against a sharply divided collection of strong unions
(see Historical Setting, ch. 3).
Beginning after World War II and lasting until the late 1960s, a sort
of honeymoon existed between the political parties and the labor unions.
Expanding domestic economies allowed substantial concessions of benefits
to workers, whose real wages increased significantly as unionization
flourished.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - The West Indies Federation, 1957-62
Caribbean Islands
As part of its decision to push modified self-government, the British
authorities encouraged the experiment in confederation. The idea had
been discussed in the Colonial Office since the later nineteenth
century, but it was brought to new life with a regional conference held
at Montego Bay, Jamaica, in 1947. The British were interested in
administrative efficiency and centralization. The West Indians talked
about political independence. At the conference, a compromise was worked
out. The West Indian Meteorological Services and the University of the
West Indies, as a College of London University, were set up, and plans
were made for the creation of a political federation that would unite
the various territories and eventually culminate in the political
independence of the region. These new regional organizations joined
others already in existence, such as the Caribbean Union of Teachers,
established in 1935; the Associated Chambers of Commerce, organized in
1917; and the Caribbean Labour Congress, inaugurated in 1945.
The federation began inauspiciously with the leading politicians in
Jamaica--Norman Manley (then prime minister) and Alexander
Bustamante--and in Trinidad and Tobago--Eric Williams-- refusing to
contest the federal elections. This uneasy federation of ten island
territories (Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Grenada, St.
Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and
the Grenadines, Dominica, and Montserrat) lasted from 1957 to 1961, when
Jamaica opted to leave. Doomed from the start by lukewarm popular
support, the federation quickly foundered on the islands'
uncompromisingly parochial interests, especially those of the principal
participants, Trinidad and Tobago and Jamaica. The former would not
accept unrestricted freedom of movement; the latter would not accept a
binding customs union. On September 19, 1961, some 54 percent of the
Jamaican electorate voted to end their participation. It was the lowest
popular vote in any Jamaican election, but the government accepted the
decision and initiated the plans to request complete independence for
the state. Attempts by Trinidad and Tobago and Barbados to salvage the
federation after the withdrawal of Jamaica failed.
In 1962, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago became the first Anglophone
Caribbean countries to achieve independence. Barbados gained its
independence in 1966; the Bahamas in 1973; Grenada in 1974; Dominica in
1978; St. Lucia and St. Vincent and the Grenadines in 1979; Antigua and
Barbuda in 1981; and St. KittsNevis in 1983. In late 1987, Montserrat,
the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, and the Turks and Caicos
Islands remained crown colonies with limited internal self-government.
Anguilla, having broken away unilaterally from St. Kitts-Nevis in 1967,
became an Associated State of Great Britain in 1976. The proliferation
of mini-states in the Caribbean will most likely continue. The five
remaining British dependencies may yet seek independence. Moreover, it
is not inconceivable that one or more multiple-island states, such as
St. Kitts-Nevis, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, or even Trinidad and
Tobago, might split into separate entities.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - Political Systems
Caribbean Islands
Despite generally similar political traditions throughout the region,
there are marked differences among the political systems in the various
countries. For example, in the Bahamas, Jamaica, and Barbados, a strong
two-party political system has developed, and the performance of third
parties has been dismal in elections. Trinidad and Tobago has a
multiparty system, which, between 1956 and 1987, was dominated by the
People's National Movement, first under the leadership of Eric Williams
(party leader, 1956-81) and then under George Chambers (party leader,
1981-87). Furthermore, in Trinidad and Tobago, ethnic politics
constitutes a significant part of the political equation, as Hindu and
Muslim East Indians compete and form coalitions with black Trinidadians.
In the smaller islands, a number of factors have coincided to make
dual-party, democratic politics a difficult achievement. In some cases
the populations are simply too small to provide the critical mass of
diversity and anonymity. Family and kin relations make secret balloting
and privacy elusive. The associations and cooperative organizations that
were so important in Jamaica, Barbados, or Trinidad did not exist in the
smaller societies. As a result, political stability and coherence of the
type found in the larger countries have been difficult to achieve in
smaller countries. For example, between 1979 and 1983, the government of
Grenada was taken over by a band of self-avowed Marxists led by Maurice
Bishop and Unison Whiteman. The People's Revolutionary Government, as it
called itself, tried to create a new type of politics in the British
Caribbean--namely, a populist government ruling without the benefit of
elections. The experiment, which went against a long, strong tradition
of elections in the Commonwealth Caribbean, ended abruptly in confusion
with the military intervention by troops from the United States and
other Caribbean states in October 1983.
Caribbean Islands
Caribbean Islands - SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS
Caribbean Islands
With the exception of Trinidad, where East Indians and Africans are
nearly equal in number, the Caribbean states have predominantly
African-derived populations. Race, ethnicity, class, and color, however,
do not constitute the mutually reinforcing cleavages found elsewhere. No
regional political or social organization is based exclusively on race,
class, or color. Overt forms of segregation and discrimination do not
exist, and crude political appeals to race and color have not been
successful. Nevertheless, color consciousness permeates the societies,
and various forms of more subtle social discrimination against
non-Christians and East Indians, for example, have persisted.
Despite the common official language, common institutions, and common
historical experience, each island and state has a distinct set of
characteristics. For example, the local inflection of the English spoken
in Jamaica varies significantly from that spoken in Barbados or
Trinidad. Literacy rates also vary greatly from between 75 and 80
percent in Jamaica and St. Lucia to almost universal literacy in
Trinidad, Barbados, and the Bahamas.
In a region where a constant racial and cultural mixing over
centuries have resulted in extreme heterogeneity, any ethnic ideal
clashes with the observed reality of everyday life. Nevertheless, ideals
exist, often based on European models, and are at variance with the
expressed rhetoric of the political majority, which tries to emphasize
the African cultural heritage. At all levels of Caribbean societies,
tensions exist between centrifugal state policies and ideals on the one
hand and individual beliefs, family, and kin on the other. These
tensions are exacerbated by the fragile political structures and even
more delicate economic foundations on which a viable, cohesive
nationalism must be forged among the Commonwealth Caribbean peoples. The
most urgent challenges for the new political leaders lie in satisfying
the constantly rising expectations amid the reality of constantly
shrinking resources.
Perhaps as a result of its heterogeneity, the area is extremely
dynamic culturally, producing a veritable explosion of local talent
after World War II. Poets and novelists of international renown include
Samuel Selvon, V.S. Naipaul, and Earl Lovelace from Trinidad; Derek
Walcott from St. Lucia; George Lamming from Barbados; and Mervyn Morris,
Vic Reid, John Hearne, Andrew Salkey, and Roger Mais from Jamaica. In
painting and sculpture, the late Edna Manley was universally recognized.
Commonwealth Caribbean music in the form of the calypso, reggae, ska,
and steelband orchestra have captivated listeners around the world. Like
the people themselves, art forms in the Caribbean demonstrate an
eclectic variety harmoniously combining elements of European, African,
Asian, and indigenous American traditions.
Caribbean Islands
Antigua and Barbuda
Caribbean Islands
The islands of Antigua and Barbuda form a small nation whose
strategic importance is greater than its size. Located at the outer
curve of the Leeward Islands, Antigua and Barbuda are well placed for
strategic defense of the Caribbean against outside forces. The natural
harbors along Antigua's indented coast also offer havens for naval
forces (see Current Strategic Considerations, ch. 7).
By the eighteenth century B.C., Antigua and Barbuda had been settled
by their first inhabitants, the Ciboney (or Guanahuatebey) Indians. They
were followed by the Arawaks, a peaceful Indian tribe that migrated from
northern South America through the Caribbean islands and arrived on
Antigua around A.D. 35. They began slashand -burn cultivation of the
island and introduced such crops as corn, sweet potatoes, beans,
pineapples, indigo, and cotton. The Arawaks were uprooted by the Carib
Indians around A.D. 1200; however, the Caribs did not settle on Antigua
but used it as a base for gathering provisions (see The Pre-European
Population, ch. 1).
In 1493, on his second voyage, Christopher Columbus sighted the
island of Antigua and named it after Santa Maria de la Antigua. Early
settlement, however, was discouraged by insufficient water on the island
and by Carib raids. Europeans did not establish settlements on Antigua
until the English claimed the island in 1632. Antigua fell into French
hands in 1666 but was returned to the English the following year under
the Treaty of Breda. Antigua remained under British control from 1667
until independence was granted in 1981.
From the start, Antigua was used as a colony for producing
agricultural exports. The first of these were tobacco, indigo, and
ginger. The island was dramatically transformed in 1674 with the
establishment by Sir Christopher Codrington of the first sugar
plantation. Only four years later, half of Antigua's population
consisted of black slaves imported from the west coast of Africa to work
on the sugar plantations. Antigua became one of the most profitable of
Britain's colonies in the Caribbean (see The Sugar Revolutions and
Slavery, ch. 1).
In 1685 the Codrington family leased the island of Barbuda from the
English crown for the nominal price of "one fat pig per year if
asked." The Codringtons used Barbuda as a source of supplies--such
as timber, fish, livestock, and slaves--for their sugar plantations and
other real estate on Antigua. This lease continued in the Codrington
family until 1870. Barbuda legally became part of Antigua in 1860.
Although the British Parliament enacted legislation in 1834
abolishing slavery throughout the empire, it mandated that former slaves
remain on their plantations for six years (see The PostEmancipation
Societies, ch. 1). Choosing not to wait until 1840, the government on
Antigua freed its slaves in August 1834. This was done more for economic
than for humanitarian reasons, as the plantation owners realized that it
cost less to pay emancipated laborers low wages than to provide slaves
with food, shelter, and other essentials. The plantation owners
continued to exploit their workers in this way into the twentieth
century. The workers perceived little opportunity to change the
situation, and sugar's dominance precluded other opportunities for
employment on the island.
The Antigua sugar industry was severely jolted in the 1930s, as the
dramatic decline in the price of sugar that resulted from the Great
Depression coincided with a severe drought that badly damaged the
island's sugar crop. Social conditions on Antigua, already bad, became
even worse, and the lower and working classes began to protest to the
point that law and order were threatened. The Moyne Commission was
established in 1938 to investigate the causes of the social unrest in
Antigua and elsewhere in the Caribbean (see Labor Organizations, ch. 1).
In 1940, in response to the situation, the president of the British
Trades Union Congress recommended that the workers on Antigua form a
trade union. Two weeks later, the Antigua Trades and Labour Union (ATLU)
was created. The union soon began to win a series of victories in the
struggle for workers' rights.
Despite these victories, the ATLU recognized the need to participate
in the political life of the island, as the plantation owners still held
all political power. Thus, in 1946, the union established a political
arm, the Antigua Labour Party (ALP), and ran five parliamentary
candidates who met the qualification of being property owners. All were
elected; in addition, one of the five, Vere Cornwall Bird, Sr., was
selected to serve on the government's Executive Council. Bird and the
ATLU continued to push for constitutional reforms that would give the
lower and working classes more rights. Largely because of these efforts,
Antigua had full adult suffrage by 1951, unrestricted by minimum income
or literacy requirements. With each general election, the union and the
ALP put forth more candidates and won more seats in the Antiguan
Parliament. In 1961 Bird was appointed to fill the newly created
position of chief minister. Five years later, he led a delegation to
London to consider the issue of Antiguan independence. Following a
constitutional conference, Antigua became an associated state (see
Glossary) in February 1967, with Barbuda and the tiny island of Redonda
as dependencies. Antigua was internally independent, but its foreign
affairs and defense still were controlled by Britain.
During the period of associated statehood (1967-81), Antigua saw the
rise of a second labor union and its affiliated political party and the
beginnings of a secessionist movement in Barbuda, as well as the
replacement of sugar by tourism as the dominant force in the economy. In
1978 Deputy Prime Minister Lester Bird (younger son of Vere Cornwall
Bird, Sr.) and other like-minded political leaders called for full
independence. Following their return to office in the 1980 general
election, which was regarded as a popular mandate on independence,
another constitutional conference was held in London in December 1980.
An obstacle to achieving independence was the issue of Barbudan
secession; this barrier was overcome when a compromise was reached that
made Barbuda relatively autonomous internally. Complete independence was
granted to the new nation of Antigua and Barbuda in 1981.
Caribbean Islands
[an error occurred while processing this directive]