THE KHMER PEOPLE were among the first in Southeast Asia to adopt
religious ideas and political institutions from India and to establish
centralized kingdoms encompassing large territories. The earliest known
kingdom in the area, Funan, flourished from around the first to the
sixth century A.D. It was succeeded by Chenla, which controlled large
areas of modern Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, and Thailand (known as Siam
until 1939). The golden age of Khmer civilization, however, was the
period from the ninth to the thirteenth century, when the kingdom of
Kambuja, which gave Kampuchea, or Cambodia, its name, ruled large
territories from its capital in the region of Angkor in western
Cambodia.
Under Jayavarman VII (1181-ca. 1218), Kambuja reached its zenith of
political power and cultural creativity. Following Jayavarman VII's
death, Kambuja experienced gradual decline. Important factors were the
aggressiveness of neighboring peoples (especially the Thai, or Siamese),
chronic interdynastic strife, and the gradual deterioration of the
complex irrigation system that had ensured rice surpluses. The Angkorian
monarchy survived until 1431, when the Thai captured Angkor Thom and the
Cambodian king fled to the southern part of his country.
The fifteenth to the nineteenth century was a period of continued
decline and territorial loss. Cambodia enjoyed a brief period of
prosperity during the sixteenth century because its kings, who built
their capitals in the region southeast of the Tonle Sap (Great Lake)
along the Mekong River, promoted trade with other parts of Asia. This
was the period when Spanish and Portuguese adventurers and missionaries
first visited the country. But the Thai conquest of the new capital at
Lovek in 1594 marked a downturn in the country's fortunes and Cambodia
became a pawn in power struggles between its two increasingly powerful
neighbors, Siam and Vietnam. Vietnam's settlement of the Mekong Delta
led to its annexation of that area at the end of the seventeenth
century. Cambodia thereby lost some of its richest territory and was cut
off from the sea. Such foreign encroachments continued through the first
half of the nineteenth century because Vietnam was determined to absorb
Khmer land and to force the inhabitants to accept Vietnamese culture.
Such imperialistic policies created in the Khmer an abiding suspicion of
their eastern neighbors that flared into violent confrontation after the
Khmer Rouge established its regime in 1975.
In 1863 King Norodom signed an agreement with the French to establish
a protectorate over his kingdom. The country gradually came under French
colonial domination. During World War II, the Japanese allowed the
French government (based at Vichy) that collaborated with the Nazis the
Vichy French to continue administering Cambodia and the other
Indochinese territories, but they also fostered Khmer nationalism.
Cambodia enjoyed a brief period of independence in 1945 before Allied
troops restored French control. King Norodom Sihanouk, who had been
chosen by France to succeed King Monivong in 1941, rapidly assumed a
central political role as he sought to neutralize leftist and republican
opponents and attempted to negotiate acceptable terms for independence
from the French. Sihanouk's "royal crusade for independence"
resulted in grudging French acquiescence to his demands for a transfer
of sovereignty. A partial agreement was struck in October 1953. Sihanouk
then declared that independence had been achieved and returned in
triumph to Phnom Penh. The following year, as a result of the Geneva
Conference on Indochina, Cambodia was able to bring about the withdrawal
of the Viet Minh troops from its territory and to withstand any residual
impingement upon its sovereignty by external powers.
In order to play a more active role in national politics, Sihanouk
abdicated in 1955 and placed his father, Norodom Suramarit, on the
throne. Now only a prince, Sihanouk organized his own political
movement, the Popular Socialist Community, (Sangkum Reastr Niyum, or
Sangkum), which won all the seats in the National Assembly in the 1955
election. The Sangkum dominated the political scene until the late
1960s. Sihanouk's highly personal ruling style made him immensely
popular with the people, especially in rural villages. Although the
Sangkum was backed by conservative interests, Sihanouk included leftists
in his government, three of whom--Khieu Samphan, Hou Yuon, and Hu
Nim--later became leaders of the Khmer Rouge. In 1963 he announced the
nationalization of banking, foreign trade, and insurance in a socialist
experiment that dried up foreign investment and alienated the right
wing. In foreign relations, Sihanouk pursued a policy of neutrality and
nonalignment. He accepted United States economic and military aid, but
he also promoted close relations with China and attempted to keep on
good terms with the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam). The
principal objectives of his foreign policy were to preserve Cambodia's
independence and to keep the country out of the widening conflict in
neighboring Vietnam. Relations with Washington grew stormy in the early
1960s. In 1963 the prince rejected further United States aid, and, two
years later, he severed diplomatic relations.
Both the domestic and the international situations had deteriorated
by the late 1960s. The increasingly powerful right wing challenged
Sihanouk's control of the political system. Peasant resentment over
harsh tax collection measures and the expropriation of land to build a
sugar refinery led to a violent revolt in 1967 in the northwestern
province of Batdambang (Battambang). The armed forces, commanded by
General Lon Nol (who was also prime minister), quelled the revolt, but a
communist-led insurgency spread throughout the country. The spillover of
the Second Indochina War (or Vietnam War) into the Cambodian border
areas also was becoming a serious problem. Apparently one factor in
Sihanouk's decision to reestablish relations with Washington in 1969 was
his fear of further incursions by the North Vietnamese and the Viet
Cong. In March 1970, however, he was overthrown by General Lon Nol and
other right-wing leaders, who seven months later abolished the monarchy
and established the Khmer Republic.
The Khmer Republic faced not only North Vietnamese and Viet Cong
combat units but also an effective, homegrown communist movement that
grew more lethal as time went on. The Cambodian communists, whom
Sihanouk had labeled Khmer Rouge, traced their movement back to the
struggle for independence and the creation in 1951, under Vietnamese
auspices, of the Kampuchean (or Khmer) People's Revolutionary Party
(KPRP). During the early 1960s, however, a group of Paris-trained
communist intellectuals, of whom the most important were Saloth Sar
(known as Pol Pot after 1976), Khieu Samphan, and Ieng Sary, seized
control of the party. They gradually purged or neutralized rivals whom
they considered too subservient to Vietnam. After the March 1970 coup d'�tat
that toppled Sihanouk, the Khmer Rouge formed a united front with the
ousted leader, a move that won them the goodwill of peasants who were
still loyal to the prince.
Despite massive United States aid to the newly proclaimed Khmer
Republic and the bombing of North Vietnamese and Khmer Rouge
installations and troop concentrations in the countryside, the Phnom
Penh regime rapidly lost most of the country's territory to the
communists. In January 1975 communist forces laid siege to Phnom Penh,
and in succeeding months they tightened the noose around the capital. On
April 1, 1975, President Lon Nol left the country. Sixteen days later
Khmer Rouge troops entered the city.
The forty-four months the Khmer Rouge were in power was a period of
unmitigated suffering for the Khmer people. Although the severity of
revolutionary policies varied from region to region because of
ideological differences and the personal inclinations of local leaders,
hundreds of thousands of people starved, died from disease, or were
executed. "New people" (the intelligentsia and those from the
cities--those new to the rural areas), being considered politically
unreliable, were special targets of terror and of a harsh, unremitting
regime of forced labor. In 1977 Pol Pot launched a bloody purge within
the communist ranks that accounted for many deaths. The slaughter of the
Vietnamese minority living in Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge's aggressive
incursions into Vietnam led to fighting with Vietnam in 1977 and 1978.
In December 1978, Vietnamese forces invaded the country. On January 7,
1979, they captured Phnom Penh and began to establish the People's
Republic of Kampuchea (PRK). The Khmer Rouge fled to isolated corners of
the country and resumed their guerrilla struggle, which continued in the
late 1980s.
Cambodia - PREHISTORY AND EARLY KINGDOMS
The Angkorian period lasted from the early ninth century to the early
fifteenth century A.D. In terms of cultural accomplishments and
political power, this was the golden age of Khmer civilization. The
great temple cities of the Angkorian region, located near the modern
town of Siemreab, are a lasting monument to the greatness of Jayavarman
II's successors. (Even the Khmer Rouge, who looked on most of their
country's past history and traditions with hostility, adopted a stylized
Angkorian temple for the flag of Democratic Kampuchea. A similar motif
is found in the flag of the PRK). The kingdom founded by Jayavarman II
also gave modern-day Cambodia, or Kampuchea, its name. During the early
ninth to the mid-fifteenth centuries, it was known as Kambuja,
originally the name of an early north Indian state, from which the
current forms of the name have been derived.
Possibly to put distance between himself and the seaborne Javanese,
Jayavarman II settled north of the Tonle Sap. He built several capitals
before establishing one, Hariharalaya, near the site where the Angkorian
complexes were built. Indravarman I (A.D. 877-89) extended Khmer control
as far west as the Korat Plateau in Thailand, and he ordered the
construction of a huge reservoir north of the capital to provide
irrigation for wet rice cultivation. His son, Yasovarman I (A.D.
889-900), built the Eastern Baray (reservoir or tank), evidence of which
remains to the present time. Its dikes, which may be seen today, are
more than 6 kilometers long and 1.6 kilometers wide. The elaborate
system of canals and reservoirs built under Indravarman I and his
successors were the key to Kambuja's prosperity for half a millennium.
By freeing cultivators from dependence on unreliable seasonal monsoons,
they made possible an early "green revolution" that provided
the country with large surpluses of rice. Kambuja's decline during the
thirteenth and fourteenth centuries probably was hastened by the
deterioration of the irrigation system. Attacks by Thai and other
foreign peoples and the internal discord caused by dynastic rivalries
diverted human resources from the system's upkeep, and it gradually fell
into disrepair.
Suryavarman II (1113-50), one of the greatest Angkorian monarchs,
expanded his kingdom's territory in a series of successful wars against
the kingdom of Champa in central Vietnam, the kingdom of Nam Viet in
northern Vietnam, and the small Mon polities as far west as the
Irrawaddy River of Burma. He reduced to vassalage the Thai peoples who
had migrated into Southeast Asia from the Yunnan region of southern
China and established his suzerainty over the northern part of the Malay
Peninsula. His greatest achievement was the construction of the temple
city complex of Angkor Wat. The largest religious edifice in the world,
Angkor Wat is considered the greatest single architectural work in
Southeast Asia. Suryavarman II's reign was followed, however, by thirty
years of dynastic upheaval and an invasion by the neighboring Cham, who destroyed the city of Angkor in 1177.
The Cham ultimately were driven out and conquered by Jayavarman VII,
whose reign (1181-ca. 1218) marked the apogee of Kambuja's power. Unlike
his predecessors, who had adopted the cult of the Hindu god-king,
Jayavarman VII was a fervent patron of Mahayana Buddhism. Casting
himself as a bodhisattva, he embarked on a frenzy of building activity that
included the Angkor Thom complex and the Bayon, a remarkable temple
whose stone towers depict 216 faces of buddhas, gods, and kings. He also
built over 200 rest houses and hospitals throughout his kingdom. Like
the Roman emperors, he maintained a system of roads between his capital
and provincial towns. According to historian George Coed�s, "No
other Cambodian king can claim to have moved so much stone." Often,
quality suffered for the sake of size and rapid construction, as is
revealed in the intriguing but poorly constructed Bayon.
Carvings show that everyday Angkorian buildings were wooden
structures not much different from those found in Cambodia today. The
impressive stone buildings were not used as residences by members of the
royal family. Rather, they were the focus of Hindu or Buddhist cults
that celebrated the divinity, or buddhahood, of the monarch and his
family. Coed�s suggests that they had the dual function of both temple
and tomb. Typically, their dimensions reflected the structure of the
Hindu mythological universe. For example, five towers at the center of
the Angkor Wat complex represent the peaks of Mount Meru, the center of
the universe; an outer wall represents the mountains that ring the
world's edge; and a moat depicts the cosmic ocean. Like many other
ancient edifices, the monuments of the Angkorian region absorbed vast
reserves of resources and human labor and their purpose remains shrouded
in mystery.
Angkorian society was strictly hierarchical. The king, regarded as
divine, owned both the land and his subjects. Immediately below the
monarch and the royal family were the Brahman priesthood and a small
class of officials, who numbered about 4,000 in the tenth century. Next
were the commoners, who were burdened with heavy corv�e (forced labor)
duties. There was also a large slave class that, like the nameless
multitudes of ancient Egypt, built the enduring monuments.
After Jayavarman VII's death, Kambuja entered a long period of
decline that led to its eventual disintegration. The Thai were a growing
menace on the empire's western borders. The spread of Theravada
Buddhism, which came to Kambuja from Sri Lanka by way of the Mon
kingdoms, challenged the royal Hindu and Mahayana Buddhist cults.
Preaching austerity and the salvation of the individual through his or
own her efforts, Theravada Buddhism did not lend doctrinal support to a
society ruled by an opulent royal establishment maintained through the
virtual slavery of the masses.
In 1353 a Thai army captured Angkor. It was recaptured by the Khmer,
but wars continued and the capital was looted several times. During the
same period, Khmer territory north of the present Laotian border was
lost to the Lao kingdom of Lan Xang. In 1431 the Thai captured Angkor
Thom. Thereafter, the Angkorian region did not again encompass a royal
capital, except for a brief period in the third quarter of the sixteenth
century.
Cambodia - CAMBODIA'S STRUGGLE FOR SURVIVAL, 1432-1887
Cambodia's situation at the end of the war was chaotic. The Free
French, under General Charles de Gaulle, were determined to recover
Indochina, though they offered Cambodia and the other Inchochinese
protectorates a carefully circumscribed measure of self-government.
Convinced that they had a "civilizing mission," they
envisioned Indochina's participation in a French Union of former
colonies that shared the common experience of French culture. Neither
the urban professional elites nor the common people, however, were
attracted by this arrangement. For Cambodians of practically all walks
of life, the brief period of independence, from March to October of
1945, was an invigorating breath of fresh air. The lassitude of the
Khmer was a thing of the past.
In Phnom Penh, Sihanouk, acting as head of state, was placed in the
extremely delicate position of negotiating with the French for full
independence while trying to neutralize party politicians and supporters
of the Khmer Issarak and Viet Minh who considered him a French
collaborator. During the tumultuous period between 1946 and 1953,
Sihanouk displayed the remarkable aptitude for political survival that
sustained him before and after his fall from power in March 1970. The
Khmer Issarak was an extremely heterogeneous guerrilla movement,
operating in the border areas. The group included indigenous leftists,
Vietnamese leftists, antimonarchical nationalists (Khmer Serei) loyal to Son Ngoc Thanh, and plain bandits taking advantage of
the chaos to terrorize villagers. Though their fortunes rose and fell
during the immediate postwar period (a major blow was the overthrow of a
friendly leftist government in Bangkok in 1947), by 1954 the Khmer
Issarak operating with the Viet Minh by some estimates controlled as
much as 50 percent of Cambodia's territory.
In 1946 the French allowed the Cambodians to form political parties
and to hold elections for a Consultative Assembly that would advise the
monarch on drafting the country's constitution. The two major parties
were both headed by royal princes. The Democratic Party, led by Prince
Sisowath Yuthevong, espoused immediate independence, democratic reforms,
and parliamentary government. Its supporters were teachers, civil
servants, politically active members of the Buddhist priesthood, and
others whose opinions had been greatly influenced by the nationalistic
appeals of Nagaravatta before it was closed down by the French
in 1942. Many Democrats sympathized with the violent methods of the
Khmer Issarak. The Liberal Party, led by Prince Norodom Norindeth,
represented the interests of the old rural elites, including large
landowners. They preferred continuing some form of the colonial
relationship with France, and advocated gradual democratic reform. In
the Consultative Assembly election held in September 1946, the Democrats
won fifty out of sixty-seven seats.
With a solid majority in the assembly, the Democrats drafted a
constitution modeled on that of the French Fourth Republic. Power was
concentrated in the hands of a popularly elected National Assembly. The
king reluctantly proclaimed the new constitution on May 6, 1947. While
it recognized him as the "spiritual head of the state," it
reduced him to the status of a constitutional monarch, and it left
unclear the extent to which he could play an active role in the politics
of the nation. Sihanouk would turn this ambiguity to his advantage in
later years, however.
In the December 1947 elections for the National Assembly, the
Democrats again won a large majority. Despite this, dissension within
the party was rampant. Its founder, Prince Yuthevong, had died and no
clear leader had emerged to succeed him. During the period 1948 to 1949,
the Democrats appeared united only in their opposition to legislation
sponsored by the king or his appointees. A major issue was the king's
receptivity to independence within the French Union, proposed in a draft
treaty offered by the French in late 1948. Following dissolution of the
National Assembly in September 1949, agreement on the pact was reached
through an exchange of letters between King Sihanouk and the French
government. It went into effect two months later, though National
Assembly ratification of the treaty was never secured.
The treaty granted Cambodia what Sihanouk called "fifty percent
independence": by it, the colonial relationship was formally ended,
and the Cambodians were given control of most administrative functions.
Cambodian armed forces were granted freedom of action within a
self-governing autonomous zone comprising Batdambang and Siemreab
provinces, which had been recovered from Thailand after World War II,
but which the French, hard-pressed elsewhere, did not have the resources
to control. Cambodia was still required to coordinate foreign policy
matters with the High Council of the French Union, however, and France
retained a significant measure of control over the judicial system,
finances, and customs. Control of wartime military operations outside
the autonomous zone remained in French hands. France was also permitted
to maintain military bases on Cambodian territory. In 1950 Cambodia was
accorded diplomatic recognition by the United States and by most
noncommunist powers, but in Asia only Thailand and the Republic of Korea
(South Korea) extended recognition.
The Democrats won a majority in the second National Assembly election
in September 1951, and they continued their policy of opposing the king
on practically all fronts. In an effort to win greater popular approval,
Sihanouk asked the French to release nationalist Son Ngoc Thanh from
exile and to allow him to return to his country. He made a triumphant
entry into Phnom Penh on October 29, 1951. It was not long, however,
before he began demanding withdrawal of French troops from Cambodia. He
reiterated this demand in early 1952 in Khmer Krok (Khmer
Awake!) a weekly newspaper that he had founded. The newspaper was forced
to cease publication in March, and Son Ngoc Thanh fled the capital with
a few armed followers to join the Khmer Issarak. Branded alternately a
communist and an agent of the United States Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) by Sihanouk, he remained in exile until Lon Nol established the
Khmer Republic in 1970.
In June 1952, Sihanouk announced the dismissal of his cabinet,
suspended the constitution, and assumed control of the government as
prime minister. Then, without clear constitutional sanction, he
dissolved the National Assembly and proclaimed martial law in January
1953. Sihanouk exercised direct rule for almost three years, from June
1952 until February 1955. After dissolution of the assembly, he created
an Advisory Council to supplant the legislature and appointed his
father, Norodom Suramarit, as regent.
In March 1953, Sihanouk went to France. Ostensibly, he was traveling
for his health; actually, he was mounting an intensive campaign to
persuade the French to grant complete independence. The climate of
opinion in Cambodia at the time was such that if he did not achieve full
independence quickly, the people were likely to turn to Son Ngoc Thanh
and the Khmer Issarak, who were fully committed to attaining that goal.
At meetings with the French president and with other high officials, the
French suggested that Sihanouk was unduly "alarmist" about
internal political conditions. The French also made the thinly veiled
threat that, if he continued to be uncooperative, they might replace
him. The trip appeared to be a failure, but on his way home by way of
the United States, Canada, and Japan, Sihanouk publicized Cambodia's
plight in the media.
To further dramatize his "royal crusade for independence,"
Sihanouk, declaring that he would not return until the French gave
assurances that full independence would be granted, left Phnom Penh in
June to go into self-imposed exile in Thailand. Unwelcome in Bangkok, he
moved to his royal villa near the ruins of Angkor in Siemreab Province.
Siemreab, part of the autonomous military zone established in 1949, was
commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Lon Nol, formerly a right-wing
politician who was becoming a prominent, and in time would be an
indispensable, Sihanouk ally within the military. From his Siemreab
base, the king and Lon Nol contemplated plans for resistance if the
French did not meet their terms.
Sihanouk was making a high-stakes gamble, for the French could easily
have replaced him with a more pliable monarch; however, the military
situation was deteriorating throughout Indochina, and the French
government, on July 3, 1953, declared itself ready to grant full
independence to the three states of Cambodia, Vietnam, and Laos.
Sihanouk insisted on his own terms, which included full control of
national defense, the police, the courts, and financial matters. The
French yielded: the police and the judiciary were transferred to
Cambodian control at the end of August, and in October the country
assumed full command of its military forces. King Sihanouk, now a hero
in the eyes of his people, returned to Phnom Penh in triumph, and
independence day was celebrated on November 9, 1953. Control of residual
matters affecting sovereignty, such as financial and budgetary affairs,
passed to the new Cambodian state in 1954.
Cambodia - CAMBODIA UNDER SIHANOUK, 1954-70
Sihanouk's nonaligned foreign policy, which emerged in the months
following the Geneva Conference, cannot be understood without reference
to Cambodia's past history of foreign subjugation and its very uncertain
prospects for survival as the war between North Vietnam and South
Vietnam intensified. Soon after the 1954 Geneva Conference, Sihanouk
expressed some interest in integrating Cambodia into the framework of
the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), which included Cambodia,
Laos, and South Vietnam within the "treaty area," although
none of these states was a signatory. But meetings in late 1954 with
India's Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Burma's Premier U Nu made
him receptive to the appeal of nonalignment. Moreover, the prince was
somewhat uneasy about a United States-dominated alliance that included
one old enemy, Thailand, and encompassed another, South Vietnam, each of
which offered sanctuary to anti-Sihanouk dissidents.
At the Bandung Conference in April 1955, Sihanouk held private
meetings with Premier Zhou Enlai of China and Foreign Minister Pham Van
Dong of North Vietnam. Both assured him that their countries would
respect Cambodia's independence and territorial integrity. His
experience with the French, first as a client, then as the
self-proclaimed leader of the "royal crusade for
independence," apparently led him to conclude that the United
States, like France, would eventually be forced to leave Southeast Asia.
From this perspective, the Western presence in Indochina was only a
temporary interruption of the dynamics of the region--continued
Vietnamese (and perhaps even Thai) expansion at Cambodia's expense.
Accommodation with North Vietnam and friendly ties with China during the
late 1950s and the 1960s were tactics designed to counteract these
dynamics. China accepted Sihanouk's overtures and became a valuable
counterweight to growing Vietnamese and Thai pressure on Cambodia.
Cambodia's relations with China were based on mutual interests.
Sihanouk hoped that China would restrain the Vietnamese and the Thai
from acting to Cambodia's detriment. The Chinese, in turn, viewed
Cambodia's nonalignment as vital in order to prevent the encirclement of
their country by the United States and its allies. When Premier Zhou
Enlai visited Phnom Penh in 1956, he asked the country's Chinese
minority, numbering about 300,000, to cooperate in Cambodia's
development, to stay out of politics, and to consider adopting Cambodian
citizenship. This gesture helped to resolve a sensitive issue--the
loyalty of Cambodian Chinese--that had troubled the relationship between
Phnom Penh and Beijing. In 1960 the two countries signed a Treaty of
Friendship and Nonaggression. After the Sino-Soviet rift Sihanouk's
ardent friendship with China contributed to generally cooler ties with
Moscow.
China was not the only large power to which Sihanouk looked for
patronage, however. Cambodia's quest for security and nation- building
assistance impelled the prince to search beyond Asia and to accept help
from all donors as long as there was no impingement upon his country's
sovereignty. With this end in mind, Sihanouk turned to the United States
in 1955 and negotiated a military aid agreement that secured funds and
equipment for the Royal Khmer Armed Forces (Forces Arm�es Royales
Khm�res--FARK).
A United States Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG) was
established in Phnom Penh to supervise the delivery and the use of
equipment that began to arrive from the United States. By the early
1960s, aid from Washington constituted 30 percent of Cambodia's defense
budget and 14 percent of total budget inflows.
Relations with the United States, however, proved to be stormy.
United States officials both in Washington and in Phnom Penh frequently
underestimated the prince and considered him to be an erratic figure
with minimal understanding of the threat posed by Asian communism.
Sihanouk easily reciprocated this mistrust because several developments
aroused his suspicion of United States intentions toward his country.
One of these developments was the growing United States influence
within the Cambodian armed forces. The processing of equipment
deliveries and the training of Cambodian personnel had forged close ties
between United States military advisers and their Cambodian
counterparts. Military officers of both nations also shared
apprehensions about the spread of communism in Southeast Asia. Sihanouk
considered FARK to be Washington's most powerful constituency in his
country. The prince also feared that a number of high-ranking, rightist
FARK officers led by Lon Nol were becoming too powerful and that, by
association with these officers, United States influence in Cambodia was
becoming too deeply rooted.
A second development included the repetition of overflights by United
States and South Vietnamese military aircraft within Cambodian airspace
and border incursions by South Vietnamese troops in hot pursuit of Viet
Cong insurgents who crossed into Cambodian territory when military
pressure upon them became too sustained. As the early 1960s wore on,
this increasingly sensitive issue contributed to the deterioration of
relations between Phnom Penh and Washington.
A third development was Sihanouk's own belief that he had been
targeted by United States intelligence agencies for replacement by a
more pro-Western leader. Evidence to support this suspicion came to
light in 1959 when the government discovered a plot to overthrow
Sihanouk. The conspiracy involved several Khmer leaders suspected of
American connections. Among them were Sam Sary, a leader of right-wing
Khmer Serei troops in South Vietnam; Son Ngoc Thanh, the early
nationalist leader once exiled into Thailand; and Dap Chhuon, the
military governor of Siemreab Province. Another alleged plot involved
Dap Chuon's establishment of a "free" state that would have
included Siemreab Province and Kampong Thum (Kampong Thom) Province and
the southern areas of Laos that were controlled by the rightist Laotian
prince, Boun Oum.
These developments, magnified by Sihanouk's abiding suspicions,
eventually undermined Phnom Penh's relations with Washington. In
November 1963, the prince charged that the United States was continuing
to support the subversive activities of the Khmer Serei in Thailand and
in South Vietnam, and he announced the immediate termination of
Washington's aid program to Cambodia. Relations continued to
deteriorate, and the final break came in May 1965 amid increasing
indications of airspace violations by South Vietnamese and by United
States aircraft and of ground fighting between Army of the Republic of
Vietnam (ARVN) troops and Viet Cong insurgents in the Cambodian border
areas.
In the meantime, Cambodia's relations with North Vietnam and with
South Vietnam, as well as the rupture with Washington, reflected
Sihanouk's efforts to adjust to geopolitical realities in Southeast Asia
and to keep his country out of the escalating conflict in neighboring
South Vietnam. In the early to mid-1960s, this effort required a tilt
toward Hanoi because the government in Saigon tottered on the brink of
anarchy. In the cities, the administration of Ngo Dinh Diem and the
military regimes that succeeded it had become increasingly ineffectual
and unstable, while in the countryside the government forces were
steadily losing ground to the Hanoi-backed insurgents. To observers in
Phnom Penh, South Vietnam's short-term viability was seriously in doubt,
and this compelled a new tack in Cambodian foreign policy. First,
Cambodia severed diplomatic ties with Saigon in August 1963. The
following March, Sihanouk announced plans to establish diplomatic
relations with North Vietnam and to negotiate a border settlement
directly with Hanoi. These plans were not implemented quickly, however,
because the North Vietnamese told the prince that any problem concerning
Cambodia's border with South Vietnam would have to be negotiated
directly with the National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam
(NFLSVN). Cambodia opened border talks with the front in mid-1966, and the
latter recognized the inviolability of Cambodia's borders a year later.
North Vietnam quickly followed suit. Cambodia was the first foreign
government to recognize the NFLSVN's Provisional Revolutionary
Government after it was established in June 1969. Sihanouk was the only
foreign head of state to attend the funeral of Ho Chi Minh, North
Vietnam's deceased leader, in Hanoi three months later.
In the late 1960s, while preserving relations with China and with
North Vietnam, Sihanouk sought to restore a measure of equilibrium by
improving Cambodia's ties with the West. This shift in course by the
prince represented another adjustment to prevailing conditions in
Southeast Asia. North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces were increasing
their use of sanctuaries in Cambodia, which also served as the southern
terminus of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, their logistical resupply route
originating in North Vietnam. Cambodian neutrality in the conflict thus
was eroding, and China, preoccupied with its Cultural Revolution, did
not intercede with Hanoi. On Cambodia's eastern border, South Vietnam,
surprisingly, had not collapsed, even in the face of the communist Tet
Offensive in 1968, and President Nguyen Van Thieu's government was
bringing a measure of stability to the war-ravaged country. As the
government in Phnom Penh began to feel keenly the loss of economic and
military aid from the United States, which had totaled about US$400
million between 1955 and 1963, it began to have second thoughts about
the rupture with Washington. The unavailability of American equipment
and spare parts was exacerbated by the poor quality and the small
numbers of Soviet, Chinese, and French substitutes.
In late 1967 and in early 1968, Sihanouk signaled that he would raise
no objection to hot pursuit of communist forces by South Vietnamese or
by United States troops into Cambodian territory. Washington, in the
meantime, accepted the recommendation of the United States Military
Assistance Command--Vietnam (MACV) and, beginning in March 1969, ordered
a series of airstrikes (dubbed the Menu series) against Cambodian
sanctuaries used by the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong. Whether or
not these bombing missions were authorized aroused considerable
controversy, and assertions by the Nixon administration that Sihanouk
had "allowed" or even "encouraged" them were
disputed by critics such as British journalist William Shawcross. On a
diplomatic level, however, the Menu airstrikes did not impede bilateral
relations from moving forward. In April 1969, Nixon sent a note to the
prince affirming that the United States recognized and respected
"the sovereignty, neutrality and territorial integrity of the
Kingdom of Cambodia with its present frontiers." Shortly
thereafter, in June 1969, full diplomatic relations were restored
between Phnom Penh and Washington.
Cambodia - The Cambodian Left: The Early Phases
The history of the communist movement in Cambodia can be divided into
six phases: the emergence of the Indochinese Communist Party (ICP),
whose members were almost exclusively Vietnamese, before World War II;
the ten-year struggle for independence from the French, when a separate
Cambodian communist party, the Kampuchean (or Khmer) People's
Revolutionary Party (KPRP), was established under Vietnamese auspices;
the period following the Second Party Congress of the KPRP in 1960, when
Saloth Sar (Pol Pot after 1976) and other future Khmer Rouge leaders
gained control of its apparatus; the revolutionary struggle from the
initiation of the Khmer Rouge insurgency in 1967-68 to the fall of the
Lon Nol government in April 1975; the Democratic Kampuchea regime, from
April 1975 to January 1979; and the period following the Third Party
Congress of the KPRP in January 1979, when Hanoi effectively assumed
control over Cambodia's government and communist party.
Much of the movement's history has been shrouded in mystery, largely
because successive purges, especially during the Democratic Kampuchea
period, have left so few survivors to recount their experiences. One
thing is evident, however, the tension between Khmer and Vietnamese was
a major theme in the movement's development. In the three decades
between the end of World War II and the Khmer Rouge victory, the appeal
of communism to Westerneducated intellectuals (and to a lesser extent
its more inchoate attraction for poor peasants) was tempered by the
apprehension that the much stronger Vietnamese movement was using
communism as an ideological rationale for dominating the Khmer. The
analogy between the Vietnamese communists and the Nguyen dynasty, which
had legitimized its encroachments in the nineteenth century in terms of
the "civilizing mission" of Confucianism, was persuasive.
Thus, the new brand of indigenous communism that emerged after 1960
combined nationalist and revolutionary appeals and, when it could afford
to, exploited the virulent anti-Vietnamese sentiments of the Khmers.
Khmer Rouge literature in the 1970s frequently referred to the
Vietnamese as yuon (barbarian), a term dating from the
Angkorian period.
In 1930 Ho Chi Minh founded the Vietnamese Communist Party by
unifying three smaller communist movements that had emerged in Tonkin,
in Annam, and in Cochinchina during the late 1920s. The name was changed
almost immediately to the ICP, ostensibly to include revolutionaries
from Cambodia and Laos. Almost without exception, however, all the
earliest party members were Vietnamese. By the end of World War II, a
handful of Cambodians had joined its ranks, but their influence on the
Indochinese communist movement and on developments within Cambodia was
negligible.
Viet Minh units occasionally made forays into Cambodia bases during
their war against the French, and, in conjunction with the leftist
government that ruled Thailand until 1947, the Viet Minh encouraged the
formation of armed, left-wing Khmer Issarak bands. On April 17, 1950
(twenty-five years to the day before the Khmer Rouge captured Phnom
Penh), the first nationwide congress of the Khmer Issarak groups
convened, and the United Issarak Front was established. Its leader was
Son Ngoc Minh (possibly a brother of the nationalist Son Ngoc Thanh),
and a third of its leadership consisted of members of the ICP. According
to the historian David P. Chandler, the leftist Issarak groups, aided by
the Viet Minh, occupied a sixth of Cambodia's territory by 1952; and, on
the eve of the Geneva Conference, they controlled as much as one half of
the country.
In 1951 the ICP was reorganized into three national units--the
Vietnam Workers' Party, the Lao Itsala, and the KPRP. According to a
document issued after the reorganization, the Vietnam Workers' Party
would continue to "supervise" the smaller Laotian and
Cambodian movements. Most KPRP leaders and rank-and-file seem to have
been either Khmer Krom, or ethnic Vietnamese living in Cambodia. The
party's appeal to indigenous Khmers appears to have been minimal.
According to Democratic Kampuchea's version of party history, the
Viet Minh's failure to negotiate a political role for the KPRP at the
1954 Geneva Conference represented a betrayal of the Cambodian movement,
which still controlled large areas of the countryside and which
commanded at least 5,000 armed men. Following the conference, about
1,000 members of the KPRP, including Son Ngoc Minh, made a "Long
March" into North Vietnam, where they remained in exile. In late
1954, those who stayed in Cambodia founded a legal political party, the
Pracheachon Party, which participated in the 1955 and the 1958 National
Assembly elections. In the September 1955 election, it won about 4
percent of the vote but did not secure a seat in the legislature.
Members of the Pracheachon were subject to constant harassment and to
arrests because the party remained outside Sihanouk's Sangkum.
Government attacks prevented it from participating in the 1962 election
and drove it underground. Sihanouk habitually labeled local leftists the
Khmer Rouge, a term that later came to signify the party and the state
headed by Pol Pot, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan, and their associates.
During the mid-1950s, KPRP factions, the "urban committee"
(headed by Tou Samouth), and the "rural committee" (headed by
Sieu Heng), emerged. In very general terms, these groups espoused
divergent revolutionary lines. The prevalent "urban" line,
endorsed by North Vietnam, recognized that Sihanouk, by virtue of his
success in winning independence from the French, was a genuine national
leader whose neutralism and deep distrust of the United States made him
a valuable asset in Hanoi's struggle to "liberate" South
Vietnam. Champions of this line hoped that the prince could be persuaded
to distance himself from the right wing and to adopt leftist policies.
The other line, supported for the most part by rural cadres who were
familiar with the harsh realities of the countryside, advocated an
immediate struggle to overthrow the "feudalist" Sihanouk. In
1959 Sieu Heng defected to the government and provided the security
forces with information that enabled them to destroy as much as 90
percent of the party's rural apparatus. Although communist networks in
Phnom Penh and in other towns under Tou Samouth's jurisdiction fared
better, only a few hundred communists remained active in the country by
1960.
Cambodia - The Paris Student Group
The 1970 coup d'�tat that toppled Sihanouk dragged Cambodia into the
vortex of a wider war. The escalating conflict pitted government troops,
now renamed the Khmer National Armed Forces (Forces Arm�es Nationales
Khm�res, FANK), initially against the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong, and
subsequently against the old RAK, now revitalized and renamed the
Cambodian People's National Liberation Armed Forces (CPNLAF).
As combat operations quickly disclosed, the two sides were
mismatched. The inequality lay not so much in sheer numbers. Thousands
of young urban Cambodians flocked to join FANK in the months following
the coup and, throughout its five-year life, the republican government
forces held a numerical edge over their opponents, the padded payrolls
and the phantom units reported in the press notwithstanding. Instead,
FANK was outclassed in training and leadership. With the surge of
recruits, the government forces expanded beyond their capacity to absorb
the new inductees. Later, given the press of tactical operations and the
need to replace combat casualties, there was insufficient time to impart
needed skills to individuals or to units, and lack of training remained
the bane of FANK's existence until its collapse. While individual
soldiers and some government units fought bravely, their leaders-- with
notable exceptions--were both corrupt and incompetent. Arrayed against
an armed force of such limited capability was arguably the best light
infantry in the world at the time--the North Vietnamese and the Viet
Cong. And when there forces were supplanted, it was by the tough,
rigidly indoctrinated peasant army of the CPNLAF with its core of Khmer
Rouge leaders.
With the fall of Sihanouk, the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong
became alarmed at the prospect of a pro-Western regime that might allow
the United States to establish a military presence on their western
flank. To prevent this from happening, they began transferring their
military installations away from the border area to locations deeper
within Cambodian territory. A new command center was established at the
city of Kracheh (Krati�). On April 29, 1970, South Vietnamese and
United States units unleashed a multi-pronged offensive into Cambodia to
destroy the Central Office for South Vietnam (COSVN), the headquarters
for North Vietnamese and Viet Cong combat operations in South Vietnam.
Extensive logistical installations and large amounts of supplies were
found and destroyed, but as reporting from the United States MACV
subsequently disclosed, still larger amounts of material already had
been moved deeper into Cambodia.
The North Vietnamese army turned on the republican government forces,
and by June 1970, three months after the coup, they and the CPNLAF had
swept FANK from the entire northeastern third of the country. After
defeating the government forces, they turned newly won territories over
to the local insurgents. The Khmer Rouge also established
"liberated areas" in the south and the southwestern parts of
the country, where they operated independently of the Vietnamese. The
KCP's debt to the North Vietnamese after March 1970 was one that Pol Pot
was loath to acknowledge; however, it is clear that without North
Vietnamese and Viet Cong assistance, the revolutionary struggle would
have dragged on much longer than it did.
United States bombing of enemy troop dispositions in Cambodia--
particularly in the summer of 1973, when intense aerial bombardment
(known as Arclight) was used to halt a Khmer Rouge assault on Phnom
Penh--bought time for the Lon Nol government, but did not stem the
momentum of the communist forces. United States official documents give
a figure of 79,959 sorties by B-52 and F-111 aircraft over the country,
during which a total of 539,129 tons of ordnance were dropped, about 350
percent of the tonnage (153,000 tons) dropped on Japan during World War
II. Many of the bombs that fell in Cambodia struck relatively
uninhabited mountain or forest regions; however, as declassified United
States Air Force maps show, others fell over some of the most densely
inhabited areas of the country, such as Siemreab Province, Kampong
Chhnang Province, and the countryside around Phnom Penh. Deaths from the
bombing are extremely difficult to estimate, and figures range from a
low of 30,000 to a high of 500,000. Whatever the real extent of the
casualties, the Arclight missions over Cambodia, which were halted in
August 15, 1973, by the United States Congress, delivered shattering
blows to the structure of life in many of the country's villages, and,
according to some critics, drove the Cambodian people into the arms of
the Khmer Rouge.
The bombing was by far the most controversial aspect of the United
States presence in Cambodia. In his book Sideshow, William
Shawcross provides a vivid image of the hellish conditions, especially
in the months of January to August 1973, when the Arclight sorties were
most intense. He claims that the bombing contributed to the forging of a
brutal and singlemindedly fanatical Khmer Rouge movement. However, his
arguments have been disputed by several United States
officials--including the former ambassador to Cambodia, Emory C. Swank,
and the former Air Force commander in Thailand, General John W. Vogt--in
an appendix to the second volume of the memoirs of then Secretary of
State, Henry Kissinger.
From the Khmer Rouge perspective, however, the severity of the
bombings was matched by the treachery of the North Vietnamese. The
Cambodian communists had refused to take part in the Paris peace talks.
When North Vietnam and the United States signed the Paris Peace Accords
on January 27, 1973, bombing missions over Vietnam and Laos were
terminated. The fighter bombers and other aircraft thus released were
diverted to strike Khmer Rouge positions in Cambodia.
Cambodia - Early Khmer Rouge Atrocities
Mid-April is the beginning of the Cambodian new year, the year's most
festive celebration. For many Cambodians, the fall of Phnom Penh
promised both a new year and a new era of peace. The people of Phnom
Penh and of other cities waited in anticipation for the appearance of
their new rulers. The troops who entered the capital on April 17 were
mostly grim-faced youths clad in black with the checkered scarves that
had become the uniform of the movement. Their unsmiling demeanor quickly
dispelled popular enthusiasm. People began to realize that, in the eyes
of the victors, the war was not over; it was just beginning, and the
people were the new enemy. According to Father Ponchaud, as the sense of
consternation and dread grew, it seemed that "a slab of lead had
fallen on the city."
Evacuation of Phnom Penh began immediately.The black-clad troops told
the residents that they would move only about "two or three
kilometers" outside the city and would return in "two or three
days." Other witnesses report being told that the evacuation was
because of the threat of an American bombing and that they did not have
to lock their houses since the Khmer Rouge would "take care of
everything" until they returned. The roads out of the city were
clogged with evacuees. Phnom Penh--the population of which, numbering
2.5 million people, included as many as 1.5 million wartime refugees
living with relatives or in shantytowns around the urban center--was
soon emptied. Similar evacuations occurred at Batdambang, Kampong Cham,
Siemreab, Kampong Thum, and the country's other towns and cities.
There were no exceptions to the evacuation. Even Phnom Penh's
hospitals were emptied of their patients. The Khmer Rouge provided
transportation for some of the aged and the disabled, and they set up
stockpiles of food outside the city for the refugees; however, the
supplies were inadequate to sustain the hundreds of thousands of people
on the road. Even seriously injured hospital patients, many without any
means of conveyance, were summarily forced to leave regardless of their
condition. According to Khieu Samphan, the evacuation of Phnom Penh's
famished and disease-racked population resulted in 2,000 to 3,000
deaths, which is probably an understatement. The foreign community,
about 800 persons, was quarantined in the French embassy compound, and
by the end of the month the foreigners were taken by truck to the Thai
border. Khmer women who were married to foreigners were allowed to
accompany their husbands, but Khmer men were not permitted to leave with
their foreign wives.
Promises that urban residents forced into the countryside would be
allowed to return home were never kept. Instead, the town dwellers,
regarded as politically unreliable "new people," were put to
work in forced labor battalions throughout the country. One refugee, for
example, recalled that her family was sent to the region around Moung
Roessei in Batdambang Province to clear land and grow rice.
Aside from the alleged threat of United States air strikes, the Khmer
Rouge justified the evacuations in terms of the impossibility of
transporting sufficient food to feed an urban population of between 2
and 3 million people. Lack of adequate transportation meant that,
instead of bringing food to the people (tons of it lay in storehouses in
the port city of Kampong Saom, according to Father Ponchaud), the people
had to be brought to (and had to grow) the food. But there were other,
more basic motivations. The Khmer Rouge was determined to turn the
country into a nation of peasants in which the corruption and parasitism
of city life would be completely uprooted. In addition, Pol Pot wanted
to break up the "enemy spy organizations" that allegedly were
based in the urban areas. Finally, it seems that Pol Pot and his
hard-line associates on the KCP Political Bureau used the forced
evacuations to gain control of the city's population and to weaken the
position of their factional rivals within the communist party. Had Phnom
Penh been controlled by one of the more moderate communist leaders, the
exodus might not have taken place when it did.
The regime immediately seized and executed as many Khmer Republic
civil servants, police, and military officers as it could find. Evacuees
who had been associated with the Lon Nol government had to feign peasant
or working-class backgrounds to avoid certain death. One refugee wrote
that she and her family, who came from the middle or upper middle class,
dyed their city clothes black (like those of peasants) to help them
escape detection. In one incident, soon after the fall of Phnom Penh,
more than 300 former military officers were told to put on their dress
uniforms in order to "meet Sihanouk." Instead, they were taken
to a jungle clearing in Batdambang Province and were machine-gunned or
clubbed to death. The wives and the children of people with government
backgrounds were also killed, apparently to eliminate people who might
harbor feelings of revenge toward the regime.
According to refugee accounts, the rate of killing had decreased by
the summer of 1975. Some civil servants and educated people were sent to
"reeducation centers" and, if they showed "genuine"
contrition, were put in forced labor battalions. There were new
killings, however, in late 1975 and in early 1976. Many of the victims
were educated people, such as schoolteachers. During the entire
Democratic Kampuchea period from 1975 to 1978, cadres exercised the
power of life and death, especially over "new people," for
whom threats of being struck with a pickax or an ax handle and of being
"put in a plastic bag" were a part of everyday life. In order
to save ammunition, firearms were rarely used. People were murdered for
not working hard, for complaining about living conditions, for
collecting or stealing food for their own use, for wearing jewelry, for
having sexual relations, for grieving over the loss of relatives or
friends, or for expressing religious sentiments. Sick people were often
eliminated. The killings often, if not usually, occurred without any
kind of trial, and they continued, uninterrupted, until the 1979
Vietnamese invasion. People who displeased the Angkar, or its local
representatives, customarily received a formal warning (kosang)
to mend their ways. More than two warnings resulted in being given an
"invitation," which meant certain death. In 1977 and 1978 the
violence reached a climax as the revolutionaries turned against each
other in bloody purges.
Cambodia - Revolutionary Terror
The social transformation wrought by the Khmer Rouge, first, in the
areas that they occupied during the war with Lon Nol and, then, in
varying degrees, throughout the country, was far more radical than
anything attempted by the Russian, Chinese, or Vietnamese revolutions.
According to Pol Pot, five classes existed in prerevolutionary Cambodia
-- peasants, workers, bourgeoisie, capitalists, and feudalists.
Postrevolutionary society, as defined by the 1976 Constitution of
Democratic Kampuchea, consisted of workers, peasants, and "all
other Kampuchean working people." No allowance was made for a
transitional stage such as China's "New Democracy" in which
"patriotic" landlord or bourgeois elements were permitted to
play a role in socialist construction. Sihanouk writes that in 1975 he,
Khieu Samphan, and Khieu Thirith went to visit Zhou Enlai, who was
gravely ill. Zhou warned them not to attempt to achieve communism
suddenly by one "great leap forward" without intermediate
steps, as China had done with disastrous results in the late 1950s.
Khieu Samphan and Khieu Thirith "just smiled an incredulous and
superior smile." Khieu Samphan and Son Sen later boasted to
Sihanouk that "we will be the first nation to create a completely
communist society without wasting time on intermediate steps."
Although conditions varied from region to region, a situation that
was, in part, a reflection of factional divisions that still existed
within the KCP during the 1970s, the testimony of refugees reveals that
the most salient social division was between the politically suspect
"new people," those driven out of the towns after the
communist victory, and the more reliable "old people," the
poor and lower middle-class peasants who had remained in the
countryside. Despite the ideological commitment to radical equality, KCP
members and the armed forces constituted a clearly recognizable elite.
The working class was a negligible factor because of the evacuation of
the urban areas and the idling of most of the country's few factories.
The one important working class group in prerevolutionary
Cambodia--laborers on large rubber plantations--traditionally had
consisted mostly of Vietnamese emigrants and thus was politically
suspect.
The number of people, including refugees, living in the urban areas,
on the eve of the communist victory probably was somewhat more than 3
million, in a wartime population that has been estimated at between 5.7
and 7.3 million. As mentioned, despite their rural origins, the refugees
were considered "new people"-- that is, people unsympathetic
to Democratic Kampuchea. Some doubtless passed as "old people"
after returning to their native villages, but the Khmer Rouge seem to
have been extremely vigilant in recording and keeping track of the
movements of families and of individuals. The lowest unit of social
control, the krom (group), consisted of ten to fifteen nuclear
families whose activities were closely supervised by a three-person
committee. The committee chairman was selected by the KCP. This grass
roots leadership was required to note the social origin of each family
under its jurisdiction and to report it to persons higher up in the
Angkar hierarchy. The number of "new people" may initially
have been as high as 2.5 million.
The "new people" were treated as slave laborers. They were
constantly moved, were forced to do the hardest physical labor, and
worked in the most inhospitable, fever-ridden parts of the country, such
as forests, upland areas, and swamps. "New people" were
segregated from "old people," enjoyed little or no privacy,
and received the smallest rice rations. When the country experienced
food shortages in 1977, the "new people" suffered the most.
The medical care available to them was primitive or nonexistent.
Families often were separated because people were divided into work
brigades according to age and sex and sent to different parts of the
country. "New people" were subjected to unending political
indoctrination and could be executed without trial. The creation of what
amounted to a slave class suggests continuity between the Cambodian
revolution and the country's ancient history. Like the Khmer Rouge
leadership, the god-kings of Angkor had commanded armies of slaves. Pol
Pot boasted in 1977 that "if our people can make Angkor, they can
make anything."
The situation of the "old people" under Khmer Rouge rule
was more ambiguous. Refugee interviews reveal cases in which villagers
were treated as harshly as the "new people," enduring forced
labor, indoctrination, the separation of children from parents, and
executions; however, they were generally allowed to remain in their
native villages. Because of their age-old resentment of the urban and
rural elites, many of the poorest peasants probably were sympathetic to
Khmer Rouge goals. In the early 1980s, visiting Western journalists
found that the issue of peasant support for the Khmer Rouge was an
extremely sensitive subject that officials of the People's Republic of
Kampuchea had little inclination to discuss.
On the basis of interviews with refugees from different parts of the
country as well as other sources, Vickery has argued that there was a
wide regional variation in the severity of policies adopted by local
Khmer Rouge authorities. Ideology had something to do with the
differences, but the availability of food, the level of local
development, and the personal qualities of cadres also were important
factors. The greatest number of deaths occurred in undeveloped
districts, where "new people" were sent to clear land. While
conditions were hellish in some localities, they apparently were
tolerable in others. Vickery describes the Eastern Zone, which was
dominated by pro-Vietnamese cadres, as one in which the extreme policies
of the Pol Pot leadership were not adopted (at least until 1978, when
the Eastern leadership was liquidated in a bloody purge). Executions
were few, "old people" and "new people" were treated
largely the same, and food was made available to the entire population.
Although the Southwestern Zone was one original center of power of the
Khmer Rouge, and cadres administered it with strict discipline, random
executions were relatively rare, and "new people" were not
persecuted if they had a cooperative attitude. In the Western Zone and
in the Northwestern Zone, conditions were harsh. Starvation was
widespread in the latter zone because cadres sent rice to Phnom Penh
rather than distributed it to the local population. In the Northern Zone
and in the Central Zone, there seem to have been more executions than
there were victims of starvation. Little reliable information emerged on
conditions in the Northeastern Zone, one of the most isolated parts of
Cambodia.
On the surface, society in Democratic Kampuchea was strictly
egalitarian. The Khmer language, like many in Southeast Asia, has a
complex system of usages to define speakers' rank and social status.
These usages were abandoned. People were encouraged to call each other
"friend," or "comrade" (in Khmer, mit or met),
and to avoid traditional signs of deference such as bowing or folding
the hands in salutation. Language was transformed in other ways. The
Khmer Rouge invented new terms. People were told they must
"forge" (lot dam) a new revolutionary
character, that they were the "instruments" (opokar)
of the Angkar, and that nostalgia for prerevolutionary times (cchoeu
sttak aram, or "memory sickness") could result in their
receiving Angkar's "invitation."
As in other revolutionary states, however, some people were
"more equal" than others. Members and candidate members of the
KCP, local-level leaders of poor peasant background who collaborated
with the Angkar, and members of the armed forces had a higher standard
of living than the rest of the population. Refugees agree that, even
during times of severe food shortage, members of the grass-roots elite
had adequate, if not luxurious, supplies of food. One refugee wrote that
"pretty new bamboo houses" were built for Khmer Rouge cadres
along the river in Phnom Penh. According to Craig Etcheson, an authority
on Democratic Kampuchea, members of the revolutionary army lived in
self-contained colonies, and they had a "distinctive warrior-caste
ethos." Armed forces units personally loyal to Pol Pot, known as
the "Unconditional Divisions," were a privileged group within
the military.
Given the severity of their revolutionary ideology, it is surprising
that the highest ranks of the Khmer Rouge leadership exhibited a talent
for cronyism that matched that of the Sihanouk- era elite. Pol Pot's
wife, Khieu Ponnary, was head of the Association of Democratic Khmer
Women and her younger sister, Khieu Thirith, served as minister of
social action. These two women are considered among the half-dozen most
powerful personalities in Democratic Kampuchea. Son Sen's wife, Yun Yat,
served as minister for culture, education and learning. Several of Pol
Pot's nephews and nieces were given jobs in the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs. One of Ieng Sary's daughters was appointed head of the Calmette
Hospital although she had not graduated from secondary school. A niece
of Ieng Sary was given a job as English translator for Radio Phnom Penh
although her fluency in the language was extremely limited. Family ties
were important, both because of the culture and because of the
leadership's intense secretiveness and distrust of outsiders, especially
of pro-Vietnamese communists. Greed was also a motive. Different
ministries, such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of
Industry, were controlled and exploited by powerful Khmer Rouge
families. Administering the diplomatic corps was regarded as an
especially profitable fiefdom.
Religious and Minority Communities
Article 20 of the 1976 Constitution of Democratic Kampuchea
guaranteed religious freedom, but it also declared that "all
reactionary religions that are detrimental to Democratic Kampuchea and
the Kampuchean People are strictly forbidden." About 85 percent of
the population follows the Theravada school of Buddhism. Before 1975 the
Khmer Rouge tolerated the activities of the community of Buddhist monks,
or sangha, in the liberated areas in order to win popular
support. This changed abruptly after the fall of Phnom Penh. The
country's 40,000 to 60,000 Buddhist monks, regarded by the regime as
social parasites, were defrocked and forced into labor brigades. Many
monks were executed; temples and pagodas were destroyed or turned into
storehouses or jails. Images of the Buddha were defaced and dumped into
rivers and lakes. People who were discovered praying or expressing
religious sentiments in other ways were often killed. The Christian and
Muslim communities also were persecuted. The Roman Catholic cathedral of
Phnom Penh was completely razed. The Khmer Rouge forced Muslims to eat
pork, which they regard as an abomination. Many of those who refused
were killed. Christian clergy and Muslim leaders were executed.
The Khmer Rouge's treatment of minorities seems to have varied from
group to group. The Vietnamese endured the greatest suffering. Tens of
thousands were murdered in regime-organized massacres. Most of the
survivors fled to Vietnam. The Cham, a Muslim minority who are the
descendants of migrants from the old state of Champa, were forced to
adopt the Khmer language and customs. Their communities, which
traditionally had existed apart from Khmer villages, were broken up.
Forty thousand Cham were killed in two districts of Kampong Cham
Province alone. Thai minorities living near the Thai border also were
persecuted.
Despite the fact that Chinese and Sino-Khmers had dominated the
Cambodian economy for centuries and could be considered exploiters of
the peasantry, the Khmer Rouge apparently did not single them out for
harsh treatment. The war drove most rural Chinese into the cities, and
after the forced evacuations they and their urban compatriots were
regarded as "new people." They shared the same hardships as
Khmers, however. Phnom Penh's close relationship with China was probably
a factor in the regime's reluctance to persecute them openly.
In the late 1980s, little was known of Khmer Rouge policies toward
the tribal peoples of the northeast, the Khmer Loeu. Pol Pot established
an insurgent base in the tribal areas of Rotanokiri Province in the
early 1960s, and he may have had a substantial Khmer Loeu following.
Predominately animist peoples with few ties to the Buddhist culture of
the lowland Khmers, the Khmer Loeu had resented Sihanouk's attempts to
"civilize" them. Cambodia expert Serge Thion notes that
marriage to a tribal person was considered "final proof of
unconditional loyalty to the party." Khieu Samphan may have been
married to a tribal woman.
Education and Health
Like the radical exponents of the Cultural Revolution in China during
the 1960s, the Khmer Rouge regarded traditional education with unalloyed
hostility. After the fall of Phnom Penh, they executed thousands of
teachers. Those who had been educators prior to 1975 survived by hiding
their identities. Aside from teaching basic mathematical skills and
literacy, the major goal of the new educational system was to instill
revolutionary values in the young. For a regime at war with most of
Cambodia's traditional values, this meant that it was necessary to
create a gap between the values of the young and the values of the
nonrevolutionary old.
In a manner reminiscent of George Orwell's 1984, the regime
recruited children to spy on adults. The pliancy of the younger
generation made them, in the Angkar's words, the "dictatorial
instrument of the party." In 1962 the communists had created a
special secret organization, the Alliance of Democratic Khmer Youth,
that, in the early 1970s, changed its name to the Alliance of Communist
Youth of Kampuchea. Pol Pot considered Alliance alumni as his most loyal
and reliable supporters, and used them to gain control of the central
and of the regional KCP apparatus. The powerful Khieu Thirith, minister
of social action, was responsible for directing the youth movement.
Hardened young cadres, many little more than twelve years of age,
were enthusiastic accomplices in some of the regime's worst atrocities.
Sihanouk, who was kept under virtual house arrest in Phnom Penh between
1976 and 1978, wrote in War and Hope that his youthful guards,
having been separated from their families and given a thorough
indoctrination, were encouraged to play cruel games involving the
torture of animals. Having lost parents, siblings, and friends in the
war and lacking the Buddhist values of their elders, the Khmer Rouge
youth also lacked the inhibitions that would have dampened their zeal
for revolutionary terror.
Health facilities in the years 1975 to 1978 were abysmally poor. Many
physicians either were executed or were prohibited from practicing. It
appears that the party and the armed forces elite had access to Western
medicine and to a system of hospitals that offered reasonable treatment
but ordinary people, especially "new people," were expected to
use traditional plant and herbal remedies that usually were ineffective.
Some bartered their rice rations and personal possessions to obtain
aspirin and other simple drugs.
The Economy
In its general contours, Democratic Kampuchea's economic policy was
similar to, and possibly inspired by, China's radical Great Leap Forward
that carried out immediate collectivization of the Chinese countryside
in 1958. During the early 1970s, the Khmer Rouge established
"mutual assistance groups" in the areas they occupied. After
1973 these were organized into "low-level cooperatives" in
which land and agricultural implements were lent by peasants to the
community but remained their private property. "High-level
cooperatives," in which private property was abolished and the
harvest became the collective property of the peasants, appeared in
1974. "Communities," introduced in early 1976, were a more
advanced form of high-level cooperative in which communal dining was
instituted. State-owned farms also were established.
Far more than had the Chinese communists, the Khmer Rouge
relentlessly pursued the ideal of economic self-sufficiency, in their
case the version that Khieu Samphan had outlined in his 1959 doctoral
dissertation. Extreme measures were taken. Currency was abolished, and
domestic trade or commerce could be conducted only through barter. Rice,
measured in tins, became the most important medium of exchange, although
people also bartered gold, jewelry, and other personal possessions.
Foreign trade was almost completely halted, though there was a limited
revival in late 1976 and early 1977. China was the most important
trading partner, but commerce amounting to a few million dollars was
also conducted with France, with Britain, and with the United States
through a Hong Kong intermediary.
From the Khmer Rouge perspective, the country was free of foreign
economic domination for the first time in its 2,000-year history. By
mobilizing the people into work brigades organized in a military
fashion, the Khmer Rouge hoped to unleash the masses' productive forces.
There was an "Angkorian" component to economic policy. That
ancient kingdom had grown rich and powerful because it controlled
extensive irrigation systems that produced surpluses of rice.
Agriculture in modern Cambodia depended, for the most part, on seasonal
rains. By building a nationwide system of irrigation canals, dams, and
reservoirs, the leadership believed it would be possible to produce rice
on a year-round basis. It was the "new people" who suffered
and sacrificed the most to complete these ambitious projects.
Although the Khmer Rouge implemented an "agriculture first"
policy in order to achieve self-sufficiency, they were not, as some
observers have argued, "back-to-nature" primitivists. Although
the 1970-75 war and the evacuation of the cities had destroyed or idled
most industry, small contingents of workers were allowed to return to
the urban areas to reopen some plants. Like their Chinese counterparts,
the Cambodian communists had great faith in the inventive power and the
technical aptitude of the masses, and they constantly published reports
of peasants' adapting old mechanical parts to new uses. Much as the
Chinese had attempted unsuccessfully to build a new steel industry based
on backyard furnaces during the Great Leap Forward, the Khmer Rouge
sought to move industry to the countryside. Significantly, the seal of
Democratic Kampuchea displayed not only sheaves of rice and irrigation
sluices, but also a factory with smokestacks.
Cambodia - Politics under the Khmer Rouge
To most people inside and outside Democratic Kampuchea, the communist
party was known simply as the Angkar Loeu. The party's commitment to
revolution was expressed in the terminology of the 1976 Constitution,
but no mention was made of a specifically Marxist-Leninist ideology. The
KCP's real leaders and identity were kept closely guarded secrets from
non-members until 1977. Head of state Khieu Samphan was a
front--Sihanouk describes him as a "bit player"--for the most
important leader, Saloth Sar, whose appearances and speeches were not
publicized in the official media. Under the name Pol Pot, Saloth Sar was
elected to a seat in the KPRA in March 1976 as a representative of
rubber plantation workers, and he became Democratic Kampuchea's prime
minister the following month.
The histories of most revolutionary movements contain a clandestine
theme, but rarely have any approached the near-paranoia of the Cambodian
communists. In part, this reflected the profound distrust with which Pol
Pot and his associates regarded people outside their small, closed
circle that had begun its association in Paris in the 1950s. Also, there
may have been an unwillingness to risk the support of a
still-conservative peasantry by publicly embracing Marxism-Leninism. The
most important reason for the obsession with secrecy, however, was
intraparty strife--the KCP's continuing failure to resolve factional
differences and to achieve consensus on its mission and policies. Even
more than the future, however, the past was a focus of bitter
controversy: how much should the KCP acknowledge its debt to the
Vietnamese communists?
On September 18, in a speech mourning the death of Mao Zedong, Pol
Pot announced that the Angkar was "Marxist-Leninist" and that
it enjoyed "fraternal relations" with the Chinese Communist
Party. But it was not until a year later, in September 1977, that Pol
Pot revealed the existence of the KCP and its history in a five-hour
recorded radio speech. He stated that the KCP was seventeen years old
and that its founding date had been September 30, 1960. He noted that
the KCP's decision to disclose its real identity had been encouraged by
"foreign friends" (the Chinese) who wanted the KCP to take
credit for the revolutionary victory.
Pol Pot's mention of the September 1960 founding date was extremely
significant. Within the party ranks, September 30, 1951, traditionally
had been recognized as its founding date. This was the day when the
Kampuchean (or Khmer) People's Revolutionary Party (KPRP) was
established following the reorganization of the Indochinese Communist
Party (ICP). The September 1960 meeting had been considered the KPRP's
second congress, but in the September-October 1976 edition of the
party's official journal, Tung Padevat (Revolutionary Flag),
the date of birth of the KPRP was given as September 30, 1960. Tung
Padevat declared that the new founding date was adopted because
"we must arrange the history of the party into something clean and
perfect, in line with our policies of independence and selfmastery
." Pol Pot's speech a year later gave official sanction to this
view.
Another party journal, Tung Kraham (Red Flag), mentioned the
traditional founding date, September 30, 1951, in its September 1976
issue. The argument over the birth date reflected deep factional
divisions within the KCP. Backers of the 1951 birth date, if not
pro-Vietnamese, were at least willing to recognize their movement's past
dependence on Vietnamese support. Pol Pot and his associates adopted the
1960 birthday to emphasize the party's Cambodian identity and to
distance it from any association with the Vietnamese communists. The
party's official history, or "Black Book," published
in 1978 after pro-Vietnamese elements had been liquidated, stated that
the KCP had severed fraternal party relations with the Vietnam Workers'
Party as early as 1973.
Intraparty Conflict
On the eve of its 1975 victory against the Lon Nol forces, the KCP
was, in terms of personnel, ideological viewpoints, and factional
loyalties, quite heterogeneous. Etcheson, in The Rise and Demise of
Democratic Kampuchea, identifies six factions: the Pol Pot group
(members of which he labels "Stalinists"); internationalists
(pro-Vietnamese elements who were based in Hanoi after 1954, and who
returned to the country when the FUNK united front was declared in
1970); veterans of the leftist Khmer Issarak (who remained in the
country after 1954, mostly in the southern and in western parts of the
country); veterans of the Pracheachon Party founded in 1954 (which had
contested Sihanouk's Sangkum openly until being driven underground in
the 1960s); pro-Chinese or Maoist elements (including Paris-group
intellectuals Hou Yuon and Hu Nim); and the pro-Sihanouk Khmer Rumdo. Ben Kiernan, another analyst of Cambodia, identifies three
factions: the Pol Pot faction, the pro-Vietnamese communists, and the
adherents of the Chinese Cultural Revolution model. The roles of
ideology and of conflicting party lines in factional struggles, however,
should not be overemphasized. Behind doctrinal differences lay the
dynamics of personal rivalry and the strong sense of patron-client
loyalty that has always characterized Cambodian politics.
Although the Revolutionary Army of Kampuchea (RAK) was
"reestablished" in July 1975 to bring all Khmer Rouge units
formally under central authority, real control of regional armed forces
remained in the hands of the zone party committee heads. The most
important center of regional resistance to the Pol Potdominated party
center was the Eastern Zone, comprising part or all of the old provinces
of Prey Veng, Svay Rieng, Kandal, and Kampong Cham that adjoined
Vietnam. Its leader was So Phim, a proVietnamese internationalist.
Differences between the Eastern Zone revolutionaries and the other
Khmer Rouge were readily apparent by 1975. While the uniforms of Pol Pot
loyalists and their allies were black, the uniforms of the Eastern Zone
were a distinctive green. In addition, cadre behavior toward the
civilian population in the Eastern Zone was generally exemplary. It
seems that some of the Eastern cadres were sympathetic to Sihanouk;
refugee Molyda Szymusiak wrote that during the evacuation of Phnom Penh,
a "Sihanouk Khmer" soldier advised her relatives (who were
distantly related to the royal family) to accompany him to Prey Veng
Province on Cambodia's southern border.
At least two coups d'�tat against the center were attempted--in July
and in September, 1975. The latter incident involved Eastern Zone
troops. After April 1975, Hou Yuon, one of the original Paris group,
disappeared. His colleague, Hu Nim, who was tortured and killed in the
Tuol Sleng detention center in 1977, indicated in his confession that
Hou Yuon had been liquidated for opposing the extremism of the center's
policies.
Pol Pot loyalists occupied most of the important positions in the new
government that was formed after the March 20, 1976, elections; however,
Vorn Vet, a pro-Vietnamese leader, was appointed second vice premier
with responsibility over six ministry-level economic committees, and he
also headed the special Phnom Penh capital zone. So Phim, a longtime
rival of Pol Pot within the communist movement, was first vice president
of the presidium and a member of the KCP Political Bureau. (The second
vice president, Nhim Ros, was a Pol Pot loyalist who commanded the
Northwestern Zone.) The year 1976 appears to have been a time initially
of retreat for the faction led by Pol Pot. Many communists were
alienated by his authoritarian behavior. Article 4 of the Constitution,
"Democratic Kampuchea applies the collective principle in
leadership and in work," apparently reflects this opinion. In
relation to what had gone before and what was to come, policies during
1976 were moderate. The terror eased. Relations with Hanoi were placed
on a friendlier footing. Trade and diplomatic relations were expanded.
On September 27, 1976, Pol Pot resigned as premier "for reasons
of health." Nuon Chea, the pro-Vietnamese deputy premier, became
acting premier. Little is known of the intense factional maneuvering
that was occurring at this time, but by late October 1976, Pol Pot had
regained his post. On October 22, his comeback was confirmed with his
issuance of a statement in his capacity as prime minister condemning
China's "counterrevolutionary Gang of Four," who had been
arrested in Beijing on October 6.
The influence of China on Democratic Kampuchea's internal politics
apparently was a crucial, though little understood, factor in Pol Pot's
defeat of his pro-Vietnamese rivals. Etcheson and Kiernan have
suggested, in separate articles, that radicals in the Chinese Communist
Party may have backed pro-Vietnamese Internationalist elements in the
KCP in 1976 because they were interested in preserving good relations
with Hanoi. The fall of the radicals in October 1976, a month after Mao
Zedong's death, brought in the moderates, led by Deng Xiaoping. As the
subsequent break between Beijing and Hanoi shows, Deng was inclined to
regard Vietnam as an agent of Soviet "hegemonism." Chinese
support of the Pol Pot faction may have been a crucial element in its
ability to triumph over the pro-Vietnamese communists in the fall of
1976. From an ideological standpoint, the pragmatic Deng Xiaoping and
the ultra-radical Pol Pot were polar opposites, but from the
geopolitical perspective, the post-Mao Zedong leadership recognized the
value of having a well-armed Cambodian thorn in the side of Vietnam.
Immediately after making his September 27, 1977, speech revealing the
KCP's existence, Pol Pot, accompanied by Ieng Sary and Vorn Vet, visited
Beijing, where he acknowledged the importance of Maoist thought to the
Cambodian revolution. In early 1978, the Chinese sent substantial
military aid, which included armor, artillery, and antitank guns.
The Purge
In 1975 Pol Pot concluded an alliance with the party head of the
Southwestern Zone, Ta Mok, who was a Khmer Issarak veteran and, like Pol
Pot, was strongly anti-Vietnamese. During 1977 and 1978, Ta Mok provided
the backing that enabled Pol Pot to liquidate the opposition within the
KCP and to initiate new terrorism against the local population. In
February 1977, Southwestern cadres went into the Eastern, Northern, and
Western zones to purge local Khmer Rouge. Four months later, the same
process was begun in the Northwestern Zone. The purges intensified
following an abortive coup d'�tat in August.
After the fall of the capital, Ta Mok's lieutenant, a former high
school teacher who assumed the name Mit (Comrade) Deuch, became head of
the secret police, and established the Tuol Sleng interrogation and
detention center on the site of a former Phnom Penh high school. In the
1975 to 1976 period, Tuol Sleng's meticulous records show that 2,404
"antiparty elements" were tortured and executed. The terror
escalated in 1977, when the number of victims rose to 6,330. In the
first six months of 1978, records show that 5,765 people were killed;
records for the latter half of that year have not been discovered. The
victims who passed through Tuol Sleng from mid-1975 to January 1979
numbered about 20,000. Among those who met death in the infamous prison
were Paris alumni Hu Nim and (presumably) Hou Yuon. Similar centers were
set up throughout the country (Tuol Sleng's code designation, S-21,
suggests that at least twenty other similar sites had been established).
Molyda Szymusiak writes that a new wave of terror began in the
Batdambang region after cadres arrived from the south. The Sala Som
Niat, a school for political education was converted into an
extermination center where local communists were tortured and executed.
The pattern in these centers was much the same: victims were tortured,
forced to write often absurd confessions, and then killed. A young
British teacher, captured in a yacht off the Cambodian coast, confessed
at Tuol Sleng that he had been recruited by the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA) of the United States when he was twelve years old; he was
subsequently murdered. Hu Nim was forced to confess that he had become a
CIA agent in 1957.
The Eastern Zone apparently remained largely unaffected by the purge
until May 1978, when So Phim led a revolt that provoked massive
retaliation by Pol Pot and his Southwestern henchmen. In the bloodiest
purge of the entire 1975 to 1978 period, as many as 100,000 people in
the Eastern Zone--labeled people with "Khmer bodies but Vietnamese
minds"--were liquidated or were deported to face certain death in
other parts of the country. Most of the victims were political cadres,
"new people," and Vietnamese or part-Vietnamese residents. So
Phim reportedly committed suicide as he faced capture. Some of his
subordinates, including Heng Samrin, the leader of the PRK after 1979,
fled to Vietnam.
Cambodia - The Fall of Democratic Kampuchea
Between 1874 and 1921, the total population increased from about
946,000 to 2.4 million. By 1950 it had increased to between 3,710, 107
and 4,073,967, and in 1962 it had reached 5.7 million. From the 1960s
until 1975, the population of Cambodia increased by about 2.2 percent
yearly, the lowest increase in Southeast Asia. By 1975 when the Khmer
Rouge took power, it was estimated at 7.3 million. Of this total an
estimated one million to two million reportedly died between 1975 and
1978. In 1981 the PRK gave the official population figure as nearly 6.7
million, although approximately 6.3 million to 6.4 million is probably a
more accurate one. The average annual rate of population growth from
1978 to 1985 was 2.3 percent. Life expectancy at birth was 44.2 years
for males and 43.3 years for females in 1959. By 1970 life expectancy
had increased by about 2.5 years since 1945. The greater longevity for
females apparently reflected improved health practices during maternity
and childbirth.
In 1959 about 45 percent of the population was under 15 years of age;
by 1962 this figure had increased slightly to 46 percent. In 1962 an
estimated 52 percent of the population was between 15 and 64 years of
age, while 2 percent was older than 65. The percentage of males and
females in the three groups was almost the same.
The population of Cambodia has been fairly homogeneous. In 1962 about
80 percent of the population was ethnic Khmer. The remaining 20 percent
included Chinese, Vietnamese, Cham, Khmer Loeu, Europeans. By 1981, as a
result of the Vietnamese repatriation in 1970 to 1971 and the deaths and
emigration of large numbers of Cham and Chinese, ethnic Khmer accounted
for about 90 percent or more of the population.
Dynamics
Rapid and drastic population movements occurred in the early 1970s,
when large numbers of rural Cambodians fled to the cities to escape the
fighting in the countryside, and between 1975 and 1979, when the
government forcibly relocated urban dwellers to rural sites throughout
the country. Large scale emigration also occurred between 1975 and 1979.
Distribution
Population density varies throughout Cambodia. The national average
in 1972 was about 22 persons per square kilometer. At one end of the
density scale were the provinces around Phnom Penh, where the number of
inhabitants per square kilometer could reach as many as 500, but more
generally varied between 200 and 500. At the lower end of the scale were
outlying provinces, like Rotanokiri (Ratanakiri) and Mondulkiri (Mondol
Kiri) in the northeast and Kaoh Kong in the southwest, where the density
was as low as zero to five persons per square kilometer. For almost
two-thirds of the country, the density was approximately five persons
per square kilometer.
Ethnic Khmer were concentrated in central and in southeastern
Cambodia. The Cham lived in their own towns and sections in larger
cities. The Chinese lived mainly in urban centers; in Phnom Penh they
were concentrated around the markets. The Vietnamese tended to live in
their own villages and in certain sections of Phnom Penh. The Khmer Loeu
were concentrated in the northeastern and southwestern areas of
Cambodia.
Migration and Refugees
Over the decades, some movement of the rural population in Cambodia--
either to urban areas in quest of employment or to other villages in
search of more favorable agricultural sites--has been customary. Many
highland tribal groups practice slash-and-burn agriculture that requires
movement to a new area once the soil is exhausted in a given location.
Warfare in the early 1970s drove large numbers of rural people to the
cities in search of safety. The population of Phnom Penh, for example,
increased from 393,995 in 1962 to about 1.2 million in 1971, but had
decreased to about 500,000 by 1985. With their takeover in April 1975,
the Khmer Rouge forced most of the population out of Phnom Penh into the
countryside, where large numbers either died because of hardship or were
executed. Many such population movements were forced upon the populace
under the Khmer Rouge regime. Many Cambodians who had left the country
to study abroad became de facto emigrants when the communists took over.
Thousands more fled into neighboring Thailand and Vietnam in 1975 and at
the time of the Vietnamese invasion in late 1978. Cham, Vietnamese, and
Chinese communities alike were persecuted, and their members were
killed, under the Khmer Rouge. Forced repatriation in 1970 and deaths
during the Khmer Rouge era reduced the Vietnamese population in Cambodia
from between 250,000 and 300,000 in 1969 to a reported 56,000 in 1984.
Postwar emigration of Vietnamese civilians to Cambodia remained a
subject of controversy. Some social scientists believed that the number
of Vietnamese in Cambodia in 1988 had reached at least the prewar level,
and, indeed, many Khmer feared that even more Vietnamese immigrants
would inundate their population.
During the Khmer Rouge era, about 50,000 Cambodians fled to Thailand,
and an estimated 150,000 fled to Vietnam. As soon as the Khmer Rouge
regime began to crumble under the onslaught of the Vietnamese in late
1978, a massive exodus of Cambodians began. About 630,000--braving
hostile fire, minefields, bandits, and border guards--left the country
between 1979 and 1981. In subsequent years, about 208,000 resettled in
other countries; these included 136,000 in the United States, 32,000 in
France, and 13,000 each in Australia and in Canada.
In late 1987, about 265,000 Cambodians--about 150,000 of them below
the age of 15 remained in Thailand. The Khmer refugees were supported by
the United Nations Border Relief Operation (which assumed the task from
the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in the early 1980s)
and private agencies at an annual cost of US$36 million in 1986. The
refugees were grouped in nine camps on the Thailand side of that
country's common border with Cambodia. Of the nine installations, the
most prominent was Khao-I-Dang, located near Aranyaprathet, Prachin Buri
Province, Thailand. It was controlled by the Thai military, and its
inhabitants were the only ones to be regarded legally as refugees by the
Thai government. In 1987 Khao-I-Dang had a population of about 21,000 to
25,000 (down from a peak of 130,000 at its founding in 1979), of whom
about 12,000 to 15,000 were eligible for resettlement.
The other eight camps were under the control of the three Khmer
resistance factions. These camps were considered reception centers
rather than bona fide refugee facilities by the Thai government, and
their inmates, unlike the residents of Khao-I-Dang, were considered
displaced persons rather than refugees. Of these eight installations,
five were controlled by the Khmer Rouge; two, by the Khmer People's
National Liberation Front (KPNLF); and one, by the Sihanouk National
Army (Arm�e Nationale Sihanoukiste - ANS). Khmer insurgents freely
visited the camps controlled by their own resistance factions and used
them as rest and recuperation centers.
The Khmer Rouge camps sheltered between 50,000 and 60,000
inhabitants. Access to them was granted grudgingly, if at all, even to
United Nations officials. Occasional visiting journalists reported in
the 1980s that an atmosphere of repression and fear prevailed at these
facilities. The largest Khmer Rouge installation, located on the
southwestern part of the border between Cambodia and Thailand, was known
as Site 8 and held about 30,000 persons. Smaller installations,
inhabited by 20,000 or more people altogether, were reported at Na Trao
and Huay Chan, in Sisaket Province, Thailand, and at the seldom-visited
encampments of Borai and in Ta Luen, Trat Province, Thailand.
The KPNLF controlled two camps containing a total of about 160,000
persons. The principal installation was Site 2, with a population of
between 145,000 and 150,000 and an environment noted for its rampant
lawlessness. Site 2 was located in the vicinity of Ta Phraya, Prachin
Buri Province, Thailand, and, at one time in the early 1980s, held the
largest concentration Cambodians outside of Phnom Penh.
The lone camp controlled by the ANS was Site B, also known as
"Green Hill," which was located about 50 kilometers north of
Ta Phraya and had a population of between 40,000 and 50,000. Site B was
considered by observers to be the most orderly and well-managed of the
refugee camps; it offered more living space, including room for personal
gardens, than did the others.
<>Social Structure
and Organization
Household and Family Structure
In the late 1980s, the nuclear family, consisting of a husband and a
wife and their unmarried children, probably continued to be the most
important kin group within Khmer society. The family is the major unit
of both production and consumption. Within this unit are the strongest
emotional ties, the assurance of aid in the event of trouble, economic
cooperation in labor, sharing of produce and income, and contribution as
a unit to ceremonial obligations. A larger grouping, the personal
kindred that includes a nuclear family with the children, grandchildren,
grandparents, uncles, aunts, first cousins, nephews, and nieces, may be
included in the household. Family organization is weak, and ties between
related families beyond the kindred are loosely defined at best. There
is no tradition of family names, although the French tried to legislate
their use in the early twentieth century. Most Khmer genealogies extend
back only two or three generations, which contrasts with the veneration
of ancestors by the Vietnamese and by the Chinese. Noble families and
royal families, some of which can trace their descent for several
generations, are exceptions.
The individual Khmer is surrounded by a small inner circle of family
and friends who constitute his or her closest associates, those he would
approach first for help. In rural communities, neighbors--who are often
also kin--may be important, too, and much of housebuilding and other
heavy labor intensive tasks are performed by groups of neighbors. Beyond
this close circle are more distant relatives and casual friends. In
rural Cambodia, the strongest ties a Khmer may develop--besides those to
the nuclear family and to close friends--are those to other members of
the local community. A strong feeling of pride--for the village, for the
district, and province--usually characterizes Cambodian community life.
There is much sharing of religious life through the local Buddhist
temple, and there are many cross-cutting kin relations within the
community. Formerly, the Buddhist priesthood, the national armed forces,
and, to a lesser extent, the civil service all served to connect the
Khmer to the wider national community. The priesthood served only males,
however, while membership in some components of the armed forces and in
the civil service was open to women as well.
Two fictive relationships in Cambodia transcend kinship boundaries
and serve to strengthen interpersonal and interfamily ties. A Khmer may
establish a fictive child-parent or sibling relationship called thoa
(roughly translating as adoptive parent or sibling). The person desiring
to establish the thoa relationship will ask the other person
for permission to enter into the relationship. The thoa
relationship may become as close as the participants desire. The second
fictive relationship is that of kloeu (close male friend). This
is similar, in many ways, to becoming a blood brother. A person from one
place may ask a go-between in another place to help him establish a kloeu
relationship with someone in that place. Once the participants agree, a
ceremony is held that includes ritual drinking of water into which small
amounts of the participants' blood have been mixed and bullets and
knives have been dipped; prayers are also recited by an achar
(or ceremonial leader) before witnesses. The kloeu relationship
is much stronger than the thoa. One kloeu will use the
same kinship terms when addressing his kloeu's parents and
siblings as he would when addressing his own. The two friends can call
upon each other for any kind of help at any time. The kloeu
relationship apparently is limited to some rural parts of Cambodia and
to Khmer-speaking areas in Thailand. As of the late 1980s, it may have
become obsolete. The female equivalent of kloeu is mreak.
Legally, the husband is the head of the Khmer family, but the wife
has considerable authority, especially in family economics. The husband
is responsible for providing shelter and food for his family; the wife
is generally in charge of the family budget, and she serves as the major
ethical and religious model for the children, especially the daughters.
In rural areas, the male is mainly responsible for such activities as
plowing and harrowing the rice paddies, threshing rice, collecting sugar
palm juice, caring for cattle, carpentry, and buying and selling cows
and chickens. Women are mainly responsible for pulling and transplanting
rice seedlings, harvesting and winnowing rice, tending gardens, making
sugar, weaving, and caring for the household money. Both males and
females may work at preparing the rice paddies for planting, tending the
paddies, and buying and selling land.
Ownership of property among the rural Khmer was vested in the nuclear
family. Descent and inheritance is bilateral. Legal children might
inherit equally from their parents. The division of property was
theoretically equal among siblings, but in practice the oldest child
might inherit more. Each of the spouses might bring inherited land into
the family, and the family might acquire joint land during the married
life of the couple. Each spouse was free to dispose of his or her land
as he or she chose. A will was usually oral, although a written one was
preferred.
Private ownership of land was abolished by the Khmer Rouge in the
1970s. Such ownership is also not recognized by the PRK government,
which for example, refused to support former owners when they returned
and found others living on and working their land. Some peasants were
able to remain on their own land during the Khmer Rouge era, however,
and generally they were allowed to continue to work the land as if it
were their own property. In 1987 the future of private ownership of land
remained in doubt. According to Cambodia scholar Michael Vickery, the
PRK government planned to collectivize in three stages. The first stage
involved allotting land to families at the beginning of the season and
allowing the cultivators to keep the harvest. The second stage involved
allotting land to each family according to the number of members. The
families in the interfamily units known as solidarity groups (krom
samaki) were to work to prepare the fields, but subsequently each
family was responsible for the upkeep of its own parcel of land. At this
stage, each family could dispose of its own produce. In the final stage,
all labor was to be performed in common, and at the end of the season
any remuneration was distributed according to a work point system.
Livestock at this stage would still belong to the family. By 1984 the
first stage groups accounted for 35 percent of the rural population, but
the third level accounted for only 10 percent of the farms.
Housing
The nuclear family, in rural Cambodia, typically lives in a
rectangular house that may vary in size from four by six meters to six
by ten meters. It is constructed of a wooden frame with gabled thatch
roof and walls of woven bamboo. Khmer houses typically are raised on
stilts as much as three meters for protection from annual floods. Two
ladders or wooden staircases provide access to the house. The steep
thatch roof overhanging the house walls protects the interior from rain.
Typically a house contains three rooms separated by partitions of woven
bamboo. The front room serves as a living room used to receive visitors,
the next room is the parents' bedroom, and the third is for unmarried
daughters. Sons sleep anywhere they can find space. Family members and
neighbors work together to build the house, and a house-raising ceremony
is held upon its completion. The houses of poorer persons may contain
only a single large room. Food is prepared in a separate kitchen located
near the house but usually behind it. Toilet facilities consist of
simple pits in the ground, located away from the house, that are covered
up when filled. Any livestock is kept below the house.
Chinese and Vietnamese houses in Cambodian town and villages
typically are built directly on the ground and have earthen, cement, or
tile floors, depending upon the economic status of the owner. Urban
housing and commercial buildings may be of brick, masonry, or wood.
Diet
Dietary habits appear to be basically the same among the Khmer and
other ethnic groups, although the Muslim Cham do not eat pork. The basic
foods are rice--in several varieties, fish, and vegetables, especially trakuon
(water convolvulus). Rice may be less thoroughly milled than it is in
many other rice-eating countries, and consequently it contains more
vitamins and roughage. The average rice consumption per person per day
before 1970 was almost one-half kilogram. Fermented fish in the form of
sauce or of paste are important protein supplements to the diet. Hot
peppers, lemon grass, mint, and ginger add flavor to many Khmer dishes;
sugar is added to many foods. Several kinds of noodles are eaten. The
basic diet is supplemented by vegetables and by fruits--bananas,
mangoes, papayas, rambutan, and palm fruit--both wild and cultivated,
which grow abundantly throughout the country. Beef, pork, poultry, and
eggs are added to meals on special occasions, or, if the family can
afford it, daily. In the cities, the diet has been affected by many
Western items of food. French, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Indian cuisine
were available in Phnom Penh in pre-Khmer Rouge days.
Rural Khmer typically eat several times a day; the first meal
consists of a piece of fruit or cake, which workers eat after arriving
at the fields. The first full meal is at about 9:00 or 10:00 in the
morning; it is prepared by the wife or daughter and brought to the man
in the field. Workers eat a large meal at about noon in the field and
then have supper with their families after returning home around 5:00
P.M.
Before the early 1970s, the Cambodian people produced a food supply
that provided an adequate diet. Although children gave evidence of
caloric underconsumption and of a deficiency in B vitamins. During the
Khmer Rouge era, malnutrition increased, especially among the people who
were identified as "new people" by the authorities. Collective
meals were introduced by 1977. Food rations for the new people were
meager. Refugees' statements contain the following descriptions:
"[daily rations of] a tin of boiled rice a day mixed
with...sauce"; "we ate twice a day, boiled soup and rice
only"; "one tin of rice a day shared between three people.
Never any meat or fruit"; "Ration was two tins of rice between
four persons per day with fish sauce." People were reduced to
eating anything they could find-- insects, small mammals, arachnids,
crabs, and plants.
The food situation improved under the PRK, although in the regime's
early years there were still serious food shortages. International food
donations improved the situation somewhat. In 1980 monthly rice rations
distributed by the government averaged only one to two kilograms per
person. People supplemented the ration by growing secondary crops such
as corn and potatoes, by fishing, by gathering fruit and vegetables, and
by collecting crabs and other edible animals. A 1984 estimate reported
that as many as 50 percent of all young people in Cambodia were
undernourished.
Dress
The traditional Khmer costume consisted of a shirt or blouse and a
skirt-like lower garment--sampot for women and sarong for men,
a tube-shaped garment about a meter wide and as much as three meters in
circumference. Made of cotton or of silk in many different styles and
patterns, it is pulled on over the legs and fastened around the waist.
On ceremonial occasions, elegant sampot as sarong, embroidered
with gold or silver threads, may be worn with a long piece of material
gathered at the waist, passed between the legs, and tucked into the
waistband in back. Members of the urban middle and upper classes may
wear Westernstyle clothing at work and more traditional clothing at
home.
At home both sexes wear the sampot and the sarong. In rural
areas, working men and women may wear loose-fitting pants and shirts or
blouses. Many men wear Western-style pants or shorts. A third essential
part of Khmer dress is the krama, or long scarf, that is worn
around the neck, over the shoulders, or wrapped turban-style around the
head. School children wear Western-style clothing to school. The boys
wear shirts and shorts; the girls wear skirts and blouses.
The Khmer Rouge were noted for their unisex black
"pajamas." Their typical garb was the peasant outfit of
collarless black shirt--baggy trousers and checkered krama (a
scarf knotted loosely about the neck). French anthropologist Marie
Alexandrine Martin reported that the wearing of brightly colored
clothing was prohibited under the Khmer Rouge and that women, young and
old, wore black, dark blue, or maroon sampot with short-sleeved
plain blouses. Women were forbidden to wear Western-style pants at any
time. The conical hat characteristic of the Vietnamese has been adopted
to a certain extent by Khmer in the provinces adjacent to Vietnam.
Families
The birth of a child is a happy event for the family. According to
traditional beliefs, however, confinement and childbirth expose the
family, and especially the mother and the child to harm from the spirit
world. A woman who dies in childbirth--crosses the river (chhlong
tonle) in Khmer is believed to become an evil spirit. In
traditional Khmer society, a pregnant woman respects a number of food
taboos and avoids certain situations. These traditions remain in
practice in rural Cambodia, but they have become weakened in urban
areas.
No extensive information exists on birth control or on the use of
contraceptives in Cambodia. Before the Khmer Rouge takeover, no
organizations in Cambodia were known to be concerned with family
planning. Traditional Khmer families were normally smaller than Chinese
or Vietnamese families; the desired number of children was five. Reports
suggest that several methods of contraception are currently available in
Cambodia and that these are practiced in the PRK. A recent study of
Cambodian women in France reported that 91 percent of the sample wished
to use some method of birth control and that 74 percent knew of at least
one method. The most common methods used in that group were the oral
contraceptive pill and some form of sterilization. It is not known to
what extent the attitudes of this group reflect those of Cambodian women
in general.
A Cambodian child may be nursed until he or she is between two and
four years of age. Up to the age of three or four, the child is given
considerable physical affection and freedom. There is little corporal
punishment. After reaching the age of about four, children are expected
to feed and bathe themselves and to control their bowel functions.
Children around five years of age also may be expected to help look
after younger siblings. Children's games emphasize socialization or
skill rather than winning and losing.
Most children begin school when they are seven or eight. By the time
they reach this age, they are familiar with the society's norms of
politeness, obedience, and respect toward their elders and toward
Buddhist monks. The father at this time begins his permanent retreat
into a relatively remote, authoritarian role. By age ten, a girl is
expected to help her mother in basic household tasks; a boy knows how to
care for the family's livestock and can do farm work under the
supervision of older males.
In precommunist days, parents exerted complete authority over their
children until the children were married, and the parents continued to
maintain some control well into the marriage. Punishment was meted out
sparingly, but it might have involved physical contact. Age difference
was strictly recognized. The proper polite vocabulary was used in the
precommunist period, and special generational terms for "you"
continued to be used in the late 1980s. Younger speakers had to show
respect to older people, including siblings, even if their ages differed
by only a few minutes.
Between the ages of seven and nineteen, but most commonly between the
ages of eleven and nineteen, a boy may become a temple servant and go on
to serve a time as a novice monk. Having a son chosen for such a
position is a great honor for the parents, and earns the individual son
much merit.
Formerly, and perhaps still in some rural areas, a ceremony marked
the entrance of a girl into puberty. Upon the onset of menstruation, a
girl would participate in a ritual called chol mlup (entering
the shadow). Certain foods were taboo at this time, and she would be
isolated from her family for a period of a few days to six months. After
the period of seclusion, she was considered marriageable.
Adolescent children usually play with members of the same sex. The
main exception to this occurs during festivals, especially happy ones
such as the New Year Festival, when boys and girls take part in group
games. Young people then have the opportunity to begin looking for
future mates. Virginity is highly valued in brides, and premarital sex
is deplored. The girl who becomes pregnant out of wedlock brings shame
to her family.
The choice of a spouse is a complex one for the young male, and it
may involve not only his parents and his friends, as well as those of
the young woman, but also a matchmaker. A young man can decide on a
likely spouse on his own and then ask his parents to arrange the
marriage negotiations, or the young person's parents may make the choice
of spouse, giving the child little to say in the selection. In theory, a
girl may veto the spouse her parents have chosen.
Courtship patterns differ between rural and urban Khmer. Attitudes in
the larger cities have been influenced by Western ideas of romantic love
that do not apply in the countryside. A man usually marries between the
ages of nineteen and twenty-five, a girl between the ages of sixteen and
twenty-two. Marriage between close blood relatives is forbidden. After a
spouse has been selected, a go-between meets with the parents and
broaches the subject of marriage. Then each family will investigates the
other to make sure its child is marrying into a good family. When both
sides agree to the marriage and presents have been exchanged and
accepted, the families consult an achar to set the wedding
date. In rural areas, there is a form of bride-service; that is, the
young man may take a vow to serve his prospective father-in-law for a
period of time.
The traditional wedding is a long and colorful affair. Formerly it
lasted three days, but in the 1980s it more commonly lasted a day and a
half. The ceremony begins in the morning at the home of the bride and is
directed by the achar. Buddhist priests offer a short sermon
and recite prayers of blessing. Parts of the ceremony involve ritual
hair cutting, tying cotton threads soaked in holy water around the
bride's and groom's wrists, and passing a candle around a circle of
happily married and respected couples to bless the union. After the
wedding, a banquet is held. In the city, the banquet is held at a
restaurant; in the country, it is held in a temporary shelter and is
prepared by the two families. Newlyweds traditionally move in with the
wife's parents and may live with them up to a year, until they can build
a new house nearby. These patterns changed drastically under the
communists. The Khmer Rouge divided families and separated the men from
the women. The father, mother, and children frequently were separated
for many months. A man and woman often did not have time to consummate a
marriage, and sexual relations were limited by long separations.
Extramarital relations and even flirtations between young people were
heavily punished.
Divorce is legal, relatively easy to obtain, but not common. Divorced
persons are viewed with some disapproval, and they are not invited to
take part in the blessing of a newlywed couple. Some of the grounds for
divorce are incompatibility, prolonged absence without good reason,
abandonment by either partner, refusal of the husband to provide for the
family, adultery, immoral conduct, and refusal, for more than a year, to
permit sexual intercourse. A magistrate may legalize the divorce. Each
spouse retains whatever property he or she brought into the marriage.
Property acquired jointly is divided equally. Divorced persons may
remarry, but the woman must wait ten months. Custody of minor children
is usually given to the mother. Both parents continue to have an
obligation to contribute financially toward the rearing and education of
the child.
In theory a man may have multiple wives if he can afford them, but
this is rare in practice; the first wife may veto the taking of a second
wife. Concubinage also exists, although it is more frequent in the
cities. While second wives have certain legal rights, concubines have
none.
As the married couple moves through life they have children, nurture
and train them, educate them, and marry them off. When they become too
old to support themselves, they may invite the youngest child's family
to move in and to take over running the household. At this stage in
their lives, they enjoy a position of high status, they help care for
grandchildren, and they devote more time in service to the wat (temple).
Death is not viewed with the great outpouring of grief common to
Western society; it is viewed as the end of one life and as the
beginning of another life that one hopes will be better. Buddhist Khmer
usually are cremated, and their ashes are deposited in a stupa in the
temple compound. A corpse is washed, dressed, and placed in a coffin,
which may be decorated with flowers and with a photograph of the
deceased. White pennant-shaped flags, called "white crocodile
flags," outside a house indicate that someone in that household has
died. A funeral procession consisting of an achar, Buddhist
monks, members of the family, and other mourners accompanies the coffin
to the crematorium. The spouse and the children show mourning by shaving
their heads and by wearing white clothing. Relics such as teeth or
pieces of bone are prized by the survivors, and they are often worn on
gold chains as amulets.
Social Stratification and Social Mobility
Social strata in precommunist Cambodia may be viewed as constituting
a spectrum, with an elite group or upper class at one end and a lower
class consisting of rural peasants and unskilled urban workers at the
other end. The elite group was composed of high-ranking government,
military, and religious leaders, characterized by high prestige, wealth,
and education or by members one of the royal or noble families. Each one
of the subgroups had its own internal ranking system. Before the ouster
of Sihanouk in 1970, the highest ranks of the elite group were filled
largely by those born into them. The republican regime in the early
1970s invalidated all royal and noble titles, and the only titles of
social significance legally in use in connection with the elite group
were those gained through achievement. Military and government titles
tended to replace royal and noble titles. In spite of the legislated
loss of titles, however, wide public recognition of the royalty and the
nobility continued. The deferential linguistic usages and the behavior
styles directed toward members of these groups persisted through the
1970s and, to a limited extent, were still present in the late 1980s.
In the early 1970s, the senior military officers, some of whom were
also members of the aristocracy, replaced the hereditary aristocracy as
the most influential group in the country. To some extent, this upper
stratum of the upper class was closed, and it was extremely difficult to
move into it and to attain positions of high power. The closed nature of
the group frustrated many members of the small intellectual elite. This
group, positioned at the lower end of the elite group, consisted of
civil servants, professional people, university students, and some
members of the Buddhist hierarchy. It had become large enough to be
politically influential by the 1970s, for example, student strikes were
serious enough in 1972 to force the government to close some schools.
Somewhere in the middle of this social spectrum was a small middle
class, which included both Khmer and non-Khmer of medium prestige.
Members of this class included businessmen, white-collar workers,
teachers, physicians, most of the Buddhist clergy, shopkeepers, clerks,
and military officers of lower and middle rank. Many Chinese,
Vietnamese, and members of other ethnic minorities belonged to the
middle class. The Khmer were a majority only among the military and
among the civil servants.
The lower class consisted of rural small farmers, fishermen,
craftsmen, and blue-collar urban workers. The majority of Cambodians
belonged to this group. Most of the members of the lower class were
Khmer, but other ethnic groups, including most of the Cham, Khmer Loeu,
some Vietnamese, and a few Chinese, were included. This class was
virtually isolated from, and was uninterested in, the activities of the
much smaller urban middle and upper classes.
Within the lower class, fewer status distinctions existed; those that
did depended upon attributes such as age, sex, moral behavior, and
religious piety. Traditional Buddhist values were important on the
village level. Old age was respected, and older men and women received
deferential treatment in terms of language and behavior. All else being
equal, males generally were accorded a higher social status than
females. Good character--honesty, generosity, compassion, avoidance of
quarrels, chastity, warmth--and personal religious piety also increased
status. Generosity toward others and to the wat was important. Villagers
accorded respect and honor to those whom they perceived as having
authority or prestige. Buddhist monks and nuns, teachers, high-ranking
government officials, and members of the hereditary aristocracy made up
this category. Persons associated with those who possessed prestige
tended to derive prestige and to be accorded respect therefrom.
The Khmer language reflects a somewhat different classification of
Khmer society based on a more traditional model and characterized by
differing linguistic usages. This classification divided Cambodian
society into three broad categories: royalty and nobility, clergy, and
laity. The Khmer language had--and to a lesser extent still
has--partially different lexicons for each of these groups. For example,
nham (to eat) was used when speaking of oneself or to those on
a lower social level; pisa (to eat) was used when speaking
politely of someone else; chhan (to eat) was used of Buddhist
clergy, and saoy (to eat) was used of royalty. The Khmer Rouge
attempted to do away with the different lexicons and to establish a
single one for all; for example, they tried to substitute a single,
rural word, hop (to eat), for all of the above words.
Social mobility was played out on an urban stage. There was little
opportunity among the majority of the rural Cambodians to change social
status; this absence of opportunity was a reflection of traditional
Buddhist fatalism. A man could achieve higher status by entering the
monkhood or by acquiring an education and then entering the military or
the civil service. Opportunities in government service, especially for
white-collar positions, were highly prized by Cambodian youths. The
availability of such positions did not keep pace with the number of
educated youths, however, and in the late 1960s and the early 1970s this
lag began to cause widespread dissatisfaction.
The Khmer Rouge characterized Cambodians as being in one of several
classes: the feudal class (members of the royal family and high
government or military officials); the capitalist class (business
people); the petite bourgeoisie (civil servants, professionals, small
business people, teachers, servants, and clerics); peasant class (the
rich, the mid-level, and the poor, based on whether or not they could
hire people to work their land and on whether or not they had enough
food); the worker class (the independent worker, the industrial worker,
and the party members); and the "special" classes
(revolutionary intellectuals, military and police officials, and
Buddhist monks).
Cambodia.
The Khmer Loeu are the non-Khmer highland tribes in Cambodia.
Although the origins of this group are not clear, some believe that the
Mon-Khmer-speaking tribes were part of the long migration of these
people from the northwest. The Austronesian-speaking groups, Rade and
Jarai, apparently came to coastal Vietnam and then moved west, forming
wedges among some of the Mon-Khmer groups. The Khmer Loeu are found
mainly in the northeastern provinces of Rotanokiri, Stoeng Treng, and
Mondol Kiri. The Cambodian government coined the word Khmer
Loeu--literally "Highland Khmer"--in the 1960s in order to
create a feeling of unity between the highland tribal groups and the
ruling lowland ethnic Khmer. Traditionally the Khmer have referred to
these groups as phnong and samre, both of which have
pejorative meanings. Some of the highland groups, in fact, are related
in language to the Khmer, but others are from a very different
linguistic and cultural background.
Khmer Loeu form the majority population in Rotanokiri and Mondulkiri
provinces, and they also are present in substantial numbers in Kracheh
and Stoeng Treng provinces. Their total population in 1969 was estimated at 90,000 persons.
In 1971 the number of Khmer Loeu was estimated variously between 40,000
and 100,000 persons. Population figures were unavailable in 1987, but
the total probably was nearly 100,000 persons.
Most Khmer Loeu live in scattered temporary villages that have only a
few hundred inhabitants. These villages usually are governed by a
council of local elders or by a village headman.
The Khmer Loeu cultivate a wide variety of plants, but the main crop
is dry or upland rice grown by the slash-and-burn method. Hunting,
fishing, and gathering supplement the cultivated vegetable foods in the
Khmer Loeu diet. Houses vary from huge multifamily longhouses to small
single-family structures. They may be built close to the ground or on
stilts.
During the period of the French Protectorate, the French did not
interfere in the affairs of the Khmer Loeu. Reportedly, French army commanders
considered the Khmer Loeu as an excellent source of personnel for army
outposts, and they recruited large numbers to serve with the French
forces. Many Khmer Loeu continued this tradition by enlisting in the
Cambodian army.
In the 1960s, the Cambodian government carried out a broad civic
action program--for which the army had responsibility--among the Khmer
Loeu in Mondol Kiri, Rotanokiri, Stoeng Treng, and Kaoh Kong provinces.
The goals of this program were to educate the Khmer Loeu, to teach them
Khmer, and eventually to assimilate them into the mainstream of
Cambodian society. There was some effort at resettlement; in other
cases, civil servants went out to live with individual Khmer Loeu groups
to teach their members Khmer ways. Schools were provided for some Khmer
Loeu communities, and in each large village a resident government
representative disseminated information and encouraged the Khmer Loeu to
learn the lowland Khmer way of life. Civil servants sent to work among
the Khmer Loeu often viewed the assignment as a kind of punishment.
In the late 1960s, an estimated 5,000 Khmer Loeu in eastern Cambodia
rose in rebellion against the government and demanded self-determination
and independence. The government press reported that local leaders loyal
to the government had been assassinated. Following the rebellion, the
hill people's widespread resentment of ethnic Khmer settlers caused them
to refuse to cooperate with the Cambodian army in its suppression of
rural unrest. Both the Khmer and the Vietnamese communists took
advantage of this disaffection, and they actively recruited Khmer Loeu
into their ranks. In late 1970, the government forces withdrew from
Rotanokiri and Mondol Kiri provinces and abandoned the area to the
rapidly growing Khmer communist insurgent force, the Revolutionary Army
of Kampuchea (RAK), and to its Vietnamese mentors. There is some evidence that in
the 1960s and in the 1970s the Front Uni pour la Lib�ration des Races
Opprim�s (FULRO--United Front for the Liberation of Oppressed Races)
united tribes in the mountainous areas of southern Vietnam and had
members from Khmer Loeu groups as well as from the Cham in Cambodia.
In the early 1980s, Khmer Rouge propaganda teams infiltrated the
northeastern provinces and encouraged rebellion against the central
government. In 1981 the government structure included four Khmer Loeu
province chiefs, all reportedly from the Brao group, in the northeastern
provinces of Mondol Kiri, Rotanokiri, Stoeng Treng, and Preah Vihear.
According to a 1984 resolution of the PRK National Cadres Conference
entitled "Policy Toward Ethnic Minorities," the minorities
were considered an integral part of the Cambodian nation, and they were
to be encouraged to participate in collectivization. Government policy
aimed to transform minority groups into modern Cambodians. The same
resolution called for the elimination of illiteracy, with the
stipulations that minority languages be respected and that each tribe be
allowed to write, speak, and teach in its own language.
The major Khmer Loeu groups in Cambodia are the Kuy, Mnong, Stieng,
Brao, Pear, Jarai, and Rade. All but the last two speak Mon-Khmer
languages.
In the late 1980s, about 160,000 Kuy lived in the northern Cambodian
provinces of Kampong Thum, Preah Vihear, and Stoeng Treng as well as in
adjacent Thailand. (Approximately 70,000 Kuy had been reported in
Cambodia itself in 1978.) Most of the Kuy have been assimilated into the
predominant culture of the country in which they live. Many are
Buddhists, and the majority practice wet-rice cultivation. They have the
reputation of being skilled blacksmiths.
The Brao, including the Tampuon subgroup, inhabit northeastern
Cambodia and adjacent Laos. In 1962 the Brao population in Laos was
estimated at about 9,000 persons. In 1984 it was reported that the total
Brao population was between 10,000 and 15,000 persons. About 3,000 Brao
reportedly moved into Cambodia from Laos in the 1920s. The Brao live in
large villages centered on a communal house. They cultivate dry-rice and
produce some pottery. They appear to have a bilateral kinship system.
A total of 23,000 Mnong were thought to be living in Cambodia and in
Vietnam in the early 1980s. In Cambodia the Mnong are found in Mondol
Kiri, Kracheh, and Kampong Cham provinces in villages consisting of
several longhouses each of which is divided into compartments that house
can nuclear families. The Mnong practice dry-rice farming, and some also
cultivate a wide variety of vegetables, fruits, and other useful plants
as secondary crops. Some subgroups weave cloth. At least two of the
Mnong subgroups have matrilineal descent. Monogamy is the predominant
form of marriage, and residence is usually matrilocal. Wealth
distinctions are measured by the number of buffalo that a notable person
sacrifices on a funereal or ceremonial occasion as a mark of status and
as a means of eliciting social approval. Slavery is known to have
existed in the past, but the system allowed a slave to gain freedom. The
Stieng are closely related to the Mnong. Both groups straddle the
Cambodian-Vietnamese border, and their languages belong to the same
subfamily of Mon-Khmer. In 1978 the Cambodian Stieng numbered about
20,000 persons in all. The Stieng cultivate dry-field rice. Their
society is apparently patriarchal, residence after marriage and is
patrilocal if a bride-price was paid. The groups have a very loose
political organization; each village has its own leaders and tribunals.
Several small groups, perhaps totalling no more than 10,000 people in
Cambodia and southeastern Thailand, make up the Pearic group. The main
members are the Pear in Batdambang, Pouthisat, and Kampong Thum
provinces; the Chong in Thailand and Batdambang Province; the Saoch in
Kampot Province; the Samre in what was formerly Siemreab Province (now
part of Siemreab-Otdar Meanchey Province); and the Suoi in Kampong
Chhnang Province. Some believe that this group constitutes the remnant
of the pre-Khmer population of Cambodia. Many members of the Pearic
group grow dry-field rice, which they supplement by hunting and by
gathering. They have totemic clans, each headed by a chief who inherited
his office patrilineally. Marriage occurs at an early age; there is a
small bride-price. Residence may be matrilocal until the birth of the
first child, or it may be patrilocal as it is among the Saoch. The
village headman is the highest political leader. The Saoch have a
council of elders who judge infractions of traditional law. Two chief
sorcerers, whose main function is to control the weather, play a major
role in Pearic religion. Among the Saoch, a corpse is buried instead of
being burned as among the Khmer.
The Austronesian groups of Jarai and Rade form two of the largest
ethnic minorities in Vietnam. Both groups spill over into northeastern
Cambodia, and they share many cultural similarities. The total Jarai
population stands at about 200,000; the Rade number about 120,000.
According to 1978 population figures, there were 10,000 Jarai and 15,000
Rade in Cambodia in the late 1970s. They live in longhouses containing
several compartments occupied by matrilineally linked nuclear families.
There may be twenty to sixty longhouses in one village. The Rade and
Jarai cultivate dry-field rice and secondary crops such as maize. Both
groups have exogamous matrilineal descent groups (consanguineous kin
groups that acknowledge a traditional bond of common descent in the
maternal line and within which they do not marry). Women initiate
marriage negotiations, and residence is matrilocal. Each village has its
own political hierarchy and is governed by an oligarchy of the leading
families. In the past, sorcerers known as the "kings of fire and
water" exerted political power that extended beyond an individual
village. The Rade and the Jarai have been involved intimately in the
FULRO movement, and many of the leaders in the movement are from these
two groups.
Cambodia.
The Chinese in Cambodia formed the country's largest ethnic minority
in the late 1960s and in the early 1970s. In the late 1960s, an
estimated 425,000 ethnic Chinese lived in Cambodia, but by 1984, as a
result of warfare, Khmer Rouge and Vietnamese persecution, and
emigration, only about 61,400 Chinese remained in the country. Sixty
percent of the Chinese were urban dwellers engaged mainly in commerce;
the other 40 percent were rural residents working as shopkeepers, as
buyers and processors of rice, palm sugar, fruit, and fish, and as
moneylenders. In 1963 William Willmott, an expert on overseas Chinese
communities, estimated that 90 percent of the Chinese in Cambodia were
involved in commerce and that 92 percent of those involved in commerce
in Cambodia were Chinese. The Chinese in Kampot Province and in parts of
Kaoh Kong Province also cultivated black pepper and fruit (especially
rambutans, durians, and coconuts), and they engaged in salt-water
fishing. In rural Cambodia, the Chinese were moneylenders, and they
wielded considerable economic power over the ethnic Khmer peasants
through usury. Studies in the 1950s disclosed that Chinese shopkeepers
would sell to peasants on credit at interest rates of from 10 to 20
percent a month. In 1952 according to Australian political analyst Ben
Kiernan, the Colonial Credit Office found in a survey that 75 percent of
the peasants in Cambodia were in debt. There seemed to be little
distinction between Chinese and Sino-Khmer (offspring of mixed Chinese
and Khmer marriages) in the moneylending and shopkeeping enterprises.
The Chinese in Cambodia represented to five major linguistic groups,
the largest of which was the Teochiu (accounting for about 60 percent),
followed by the Cantonese (accounting for about 20 percent), the Hokkien
(accounting for about 7 percent), and the Hakka and the Hainanese (each
accounting for about 4 percent). These belonging to certain Chinese
linguistic groups in Cambodia tended to gravitate to certain
occupations. The Teochiu, who made up about 90 percent of the rural
Chinese population, ran village stores, controlled rural credit and
rice-marketing facilities, and grew vegetables. In urban areas they were
often engaged in such enterprises as the import-export business, the
sale of pharmaceuticals, and street peddling. The Cantonese, who were
the majority Chinese group before the Teochiu migrations began in the
late 1930s, lived mainly in the city. Typically, the Cantonese engaged
in transportation and in construction, for the most part as mechanics or
carpenters. The Hokkien community was involved in import-export and in
banking, and it included some of the country's richest Chinese. The
Hainanese started out as pepper growers in Kampot Province, where they
continued to dominate that business. Many moved to Phnom Penh, where, in
the late 1960s, they reportedly had a virtual monopoly on the hotel and
restaurant business. They also often operated tailor shops and
haberdasheries. In Phnom Penh, the newly-arrived Hakka were typically
folk dentists, sellers of traditional Chinese medicines, and shoemakers.
Distinction by dialect group also has been important historically in
the administrative treatment of the Chinese in Cambodia. The French
brought with them a system devised by the Vietnamese Emperor Gia Long
(1802-20) to classify the local Chinese according to areas of origin and
dialect. These groups were called bang (or congregations by the
French) and had their own leaders for law, order, and tax-collecting. In
Cambodia every Chinese was required to belong to a bang. The
head of a bang, known as the ong bang, was elected by
popular vote; he functioned as an intermediary between the members of
his bang and the government. Individual Chinese who were not
accepted for membership in a bang were deported by the French
authorities.
The French system of administering the Chinese community was
terminated in 1958. During the 1960s, Chinese community affairs tended
to be handled, at least in Phnom Penh, by the Chinese Hospital
Committee, an organization set up to fund and to administer a hospital
established earlier for the Chinese community. This committee was the
largest association of Chinese merchants in the country, and it was
required by the organization's constitution to include on its
fifteen-member board six from the Teochiu dialect group, three from the
Cantonese, two from the Hokkien, two from the Hakka, and two from the
Hainanese. The hospital board constituted the recognized leadership of
Phnom Penh's Chinese community. Local Chinese school boards in the
smaller cities and towns often served a similar function.
In 1971 the government authorized the formation of a new body, the
Federated Association of Chinese of Cambodia, which was the first
organization to embrace all of Cambodia's resident Chinese. According to
its statutes, the federation was designed to "aid Chinese nationals
in the social, cultural, public health, and medical fields," to
administer the property owned jointly by the Chinese community in Phnom
Penh and elsewhere, and to promote friendly relations between Cambodians
and Chinese. With leadership that could be expected to include the
recognized leaders of the national Chinese community, the federation was
believed likely to continue the trend, evident since the early 1960s, to
transcend dialect group allegiance in many aspects of its social,
political, and economic programs.
Generally, relations between the Chinese and the ethnic Khmer were
good. There was some intermarriage, and a sizable proportion of the
population in Cambodia was part Sino-Khmer, who were assimilated easily
into either the Chinese or the Khmer community. Willmott assumes that a
Sino-Khmer elite dominated commerce in Cambodia from the time of
independence well into the era of the Khmer Republic.
The Khmer Rouge takeover was catastrophic for the Chinese community
for several reasons. When the Khmer Rouge took over a town, they
immediately disrupted the local market. According to Willmott, this
disruption virtually eliminated retail trade "and the traders
(almost all Chinese) became indistinguishable from the unpropertied
urban classes." The Chinese, in addition to having their major
livelihood eradicated, also suffered because of their class membership.
They were mainly well-educated urban merchants, thus possessing three
characteristics that were anathema to the Khmer Rouge. Chinese refugees
have reported that they shared the same brutal treatment as other urban
Cambodians under the Khmer Rouge regime and that they were not
especially singled out as an ethnic group until after the Vietnamese
invasion. Observers believe that the anti-Chinese stance, of the
Vietnamese government and of its officials in Phnom Penh, makes it
unlikely that a Chinese community on the earlier scale will reappear in
Cambodia in the near future.
Cambodia.
The majority of Cambodians, even those who are not ethnic Khmer,
speak Khmer, the official language of the country. Ethnic Khmer living
in Thailand, in Vietnam, and in Laos speak dialects of Khmer that are
more or less intelligible to Khmer speakers from Cambodia. Minority
languages include Vietnamese, Cham, several dialects of Chinese, and the
languages of the various hill tribes.
Austroasiatic-Mon-Khmer
Khmer belongs to the Mon-Khmer family of the Austroasiatic phylum of
languages. American linguists David Thomas and Robert Headley have
divided the Mon-Khmer family into nine branches: Pearic in western
Cambodia and eastern Thailand; Khmer in Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, and
Laos; Bahnaric in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia; Katuic in Vietnam, Laos,
and Cambodia; Khmuic in Laos, Thailand, and China; Monic in Burma and
Thailand; Palaungic in Burma, China, and Thailand; Khasi in Assam
(India); and Viet-Muong in Vietnam. Of the languages in the Mon-Khmer
family, Vietnamese has the largest number of speakers (about 47
million); Khmer, has the next largest (about 8 million).
Khmer, in contrast to Vietnamese, Thai, Lao, and Chinese, is
nontonal. Native Khmer words may be composed of one or two syllables.
Khmer is uninflected, but it has a rich system of affixes, including
infixes, for derivation. Generally speaking, Khmer has nouns (including
pronouns as a special subcategory), verbs (including stative verbs or
adjectives), adverbs, and various kinds of words called particles
(including verbal auxiliaries, prepositions, conjunctions, final
particles, and interjections). Many Khmer words change, chameleon-like,
from one part of speech to another, depending on the context. The normal
word order is subject-verb-object. Adjectival modifiers follow the nouns
they modify.
Khmer, like its neighbors, Thai, Lao, and Burmese, has borrowed
extensively from other languages, especially the Indic languages of
Sanskrit and Pali. Khmer uses Sanskrit and Pali roots much as English
and other West European languages use Latin and Greek roots to derive
new, especially scientific, words. Khmer has also borrowed terms--
especially financial, commercial, and cooking terms--from Chinese. In
the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Khmer borrowed from French as
well. These latter borrowings have been in the realm of material
culture, especially the names for items of modern Western technology,
such as buuzii (spark plug) from the French bougie.
Khmer is written in a script derived from a south Indian alphabet.
The language has symbols for thirty-three consonants, twenty-four
dependent vowels, twelve independent vowels, and several diacritic. Most
consonants have reduced or modified forms, called subscripts, when they
occur as the second member of a consonant cluster. Vowels may be written
before, after, over, or under a consonant symbol.
Some efforts to standardize Khmer spelling have been attempted, but
inconsistencies persist, and many words have more than one accepted
spelling. A two-volume dictionary prepared under the direction of the
Venerable Chuon Nath of the Buddhist Institute in Phnom Penh is the
standard work on Khmer lexicography.
Khmer is divided into three stages--Old Khmer (seventh to twelfth
century A.D.), Middle Khmer (twelfth to seventeenth century A.D.), and
Modern Khmer (seventeenth century to the present). It is likely that Old
Khmer was the language of Chenla. What the language of Funan was, but it
was is not at all certain, probably a Mon-Khmer language. The earliest
inscription in Khmer, found at Angkor Borei in Takev Province south of
Phnom Penh, dates from A.D. 611.
Austronesian
The Austronesian languages are spread over vast areas of Asia and the
Pacific, from Madagascar to Easter Island and from Taiwan to Malaysia.
Four Austronesian languages--Cham, Jarai, Rade, and Malay--are spoken in
Cambodia. Cham is spoken by the largest number of people. Before 1975,
there were about 100,000 speakers of Western Cham. Western Cham is the
term used to distinguish (at least two mutually related dialects of) the
Cham spoken in Cambodia and that used in adjacent inland Vietnam from
Eastern Cham spoken in the coastal areas of central Vietnam. Western
Cham is written in Arabic script, or, since the late 1960s and the early
1970s, in a romanized script devised by Protestant missionaries. The
traditional Cham script, based on an Indian script, is still known and
used by the Eastern Cham in Vietnam, but it has been lost by the Western
Cham.
The Cham language is also nontonal. Words may contain one, two, or
three syllables. Cham contains much linguistic borrowing from Arabic,
Malay, and Khmer. The normal word order is subject-verb-object, and, as
in Khmer, modifying adjectives follow the nouns that they modify. Most
Cham in Cambodia are bilingual in Cham and in Khmer and many also know
Arabic and Malay. Rade and Jarai, close relatives of Cham, are spoken by
several thousand members of both ethnic groups in northeastern Cambodia.
Both languages are written in romanized scripts based on the Vietnamese
alphabet. Rade and Jarai have rich oral literatures, and the former has
two epic tales that have been transcribed and published.
Cambodia - Buddhism
Origins of Buddhism on the Indian Subcontinent
Theravada Buddhism is the religion of virtually all of the ethnic
Khmer, who constitute about 90 percent or more of the Cambodian
population. Buddhism originated in what are now north India and Nepal
during the sixth century B.C. It was founded by a Sakya prince,
Siddhartha Gautama (563-483 B.C.; his traditional dates are 623-543
B.C., also called the Gautama Buddha), who, at the age of twenty-nine,
after witnessing old age, sickness, death, and meditation, renounced his
high status and left his wife and infant son for a life of asceticism.
After years of seeking truth, he is said to have attained enlightenment
while sitting alone under a bo tree. He became the
Buddha--"the enlightened"--and formed an order of monks, the sangha,
and later an order of nuns. He spent the remainder of his life as a
wandering preacher, dying at the age of eighty.
Buddhism began as a reaction to Hindu doctrines and as an effort to
reform them. Nevertheless, the two faiths share many basic assumptions.
Both view the universe and all life therein as parts of a cycle of
eternal flux. In each religion, the present life of an individual is a
phase in an endless chain of events. Life and death are merely alternate
aspects of individual existence marked by the transition points of birth
and death. An individual is thus continually reborn, perhaps in human
form, perhaps in some non-human form, depending upon his or her actions
in the previous life. The endless cycle of rebirth is known as samsara
(wheel of life). Theravada Buddhism is a tolerant, non prescriptive
religion that does not require belief in a supreme being. Its precepts
require that each individual take full responsibility for his own
actions and omissions. Buddhism is based on three concepts: dharma (the
doctrine of the Buddha, his guide to right actions and belief); karma
(the belief that one's life now and in future lives depends upon one's
own deeds and misdeeds and that as an individual one is responsible for,
and rewarded on the basis of, the sum total of one's acts and omissions
in all one's incarnations past and present); and sangha, the
ascetic community within which man can improve his karma.
The Buddha added the hope of escape--a way to get out of the endless
cycle of pain and sorrow--to the Brahmanic idea of samsara. The
Buddhist salvation is nirvana, a final extinction of one's self. Nirvana
may be attained by achieving good karma through earning much merit and
avoiding misdeeds. A Buddhist's pilgrimage through existence is a
constant attempt to distance himself or herself from the world and
finally to achieve complete detachment, or nirvana.
The fundamentals of Buddhist doctrine are the Four Noble Truths:
suffering exists; craving (or desire) is the cause of suffering; release
from suffering can be achieved by stopping all desire; and
enlightenment--buddhahood--can be attained by following the Noble
Eightfold Path (right views, right intention, right speech, right
action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right
concentration), which constitutes a middle way between sensuality and
ascetism. Enlightenment consists of knowing these truths. The average
layperson cannot hope for nirvana after the end of this life, but
can--by complying, as best he or she is able to, with the doctrine's
rules of moral conduct--hope to improve his or her karma and thereby
better his condition in the next incarnation.
The doctrine of karma holds that, through the working of a just,
automatic, and impersonal cosmic law, one's actions in this incarnation
and in all previous ones will determine which position in the hierarchy
of living things one will occupy in the next incarnation. An
individual's karma can be improved through certain acts and omissions.
By following the five precepts or commandments, a Buddhist can better
his or her karma. These commandments are: do not kill, do not steal, do
not indulge in forbidden sexual pleasures, do not tell lies, and do not
take intoxicants or stupefying drugs or liquors.
The most effective way to work actively to improve one's karma is to
earn merit. Any act of benevolence or generosity can gain merit for the
doer. Cambodian Buddhists tend to regard opportunities for earning merit
as primarily connected with interaction with the sangha,
contributing to its support through money, goods, and labor, and
participating in its activities. Some of the favorite ways for a male to
earn merit are to enter the sangha as a monk (after the age of
twenty) or as a novice, or to live in the wat as a temple servant; in
the case of a female (usually the elderly), the favorite way is to
become a nun. Other activities that gain merit include sponsoring a monk
or novice, contributing to a wat, feeding members of the sangha
at a public meal, and providing food for either of the two daily meals
of the sangha.
In his first sermon to his followers, the Buddha described a moral
code, the dharma, which the sangha was to teach after him. He
left no designated successor. Indian emperor Asoka (273-232 B.C.)
patronized the sangha and encouraged the teaching of the
Buddha's philosophy throughout his vast empire; by 246 B.C., the new
religion had reached Sri Lanka. The Tripitaka, the collection of basic
Buddhist texts, was written down for the first time in Sri Lanka during
a major Buddhist conference in the second or first century B.C. By the
time of the conference, a schism had developed separating Mahayana
(Greater Path) Buddhism from more conservative Theravada (Way of the
Elders, or Hinayana--Lesser Path) faction or Buddhism. The Mahayana
faction reinterpreted the original teachings of the Buddha and added a
type of deity called a bodhisattva to large numbers of other buddhas.
The Mahayana adherents believe that nirvana is available to everyone,
not just to select holy men. Mahayana Buddhism quickly spread throughout
India, China, Korea, Japan, Central Asia, and to some parts of Southeast
Asia. According to the Venerable Pang Khat, Theravada Buddhism reached
Southeast Asia as early as the second or third century A.D., while
Mahayana Buddhism did not arrive in Cambodia until about A.D. 791. In
Southeast Asia, Mahayana Buddhism carried many Brahman beliefs with it
to the royal courts of Funan, of Champa, and of other states. At this
time, Sanskrit words were added to the Khmer and to the Cham languages.
Theravada Buddhism (with its scriptures in the Pali language), remained
influential in Sri Lanka, and by the thirteenth century it had spread
into Burma, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia, where it supplanted Mahayana
Buddhism.
Cambodian Adaptations
Cambodian Buddhism has no formal administrative ties with other
Buddhist bodies, although Theravada monks from other countries,
especially Thailand, Laos, Burma, and Sri Lanka, may participate in
religious ceremonies in order to make up the requisite number of clergy.
Cambodian Buddhism is organized nationally in accordance with
regulations formulated in 1943 and modified in 1948. During the
monarchical period, the king led the Buddhist clergy. Prince Sihanouk
continued in this role even after he had abdicated and was governing as
head of state. He appointed both the heads of the monastic orders and
other high-ranking clergy. After the overthrow of Sihanouk in 1970, the
new head of state, Lon Nol, appointed these leaders.
Two monastic orders constituted the clergy in Cambodia. The larger
group, to which more than 90 percent of the clergy belonged, was the
Mohanikay. The Thommayut order was far smaller. The Thommayut was
introduced into the ruling circles of Cambodia from Thailand in 1864; it
gained prestige because of its adoption by royalty and by the
aristocracy, but its adherents were confined geographically to the Phnom
Penh area. Among the few differences between the two orders is stricter
observance by the Thommayut bonzes (monks) of the rules governing the
clergy. In 1961 the Mohanikay had more than 52,000 ordained monks in
some 2,700 wats, whereas the Thommayut order had 1,460 monks in just
over 100 wats. In 1967 more than 2,800 Mohanikay wats and 320 Thommayut
wats were in existence in Cambodia. After Phnom Penh, the largest number
of Thommayut wats were found in Batdambang, Stoeng Treng, Prey Veng,
Kampot, and Kampong Thum provinces.
Each order has its own superior and is organized into a hierarchy of
eleven levels. The seven lower levels are known collectively as the thananukram;
the four higher levels together are called the rajagana. The
Mohanikay order has thirty-five monks in the rajagana; the
Thommayut has twentyone . Each monk must serve for at least twenty years
to be named to these highest levels.
The cornerstones of Cambodian Buddhism are the Buddhist bonze and the
wat. Traditionally, each village has a spiritual center--a wat--where
from five to more than seventy bonzes reside. A typical wat in rural
Cambodia consists of a walled enclosure containing a sanctuary, several
residences for bonzes, a hall, a kitchen, quarters for nuns, and a pond.
The number of monks varies according to the size of the local
population. The sanctuary, which contains an altar with statues of the
Buddha and, in rare cases, a religious relic, is reserved for major
ceremonies and usually only for the use of bonzes. Other ceremonies,
classes for monks and for laity, and meals take place in the hall.
Stupas containing the ashes of extended family members are constructed
near the sanctuary. Fruit trees and vegetable gardens tended by local
children are also part of the local wat. The main entrance, usually only
for ceremonial use, faces east; other entrances are located at other
points around the wall. There are no gates.
Steinberg notes the striking ratio of bonzes to the total population
of Cambodia. In the late 1950s, an estimated 100,000 bonzes (including
about 40,000 novices) served a population of about 5 million. This high
proportion undoubtedly was caused in large part by the ease with which
one could enter and leave the sangha. Becoming a bonze and
leaving the sangha are matters of individual choice although,
in theory, nearly all Cambodian males over sixteen serve terms as
bonzes. Most young men do not intend to become fully ordained bonzes (bhikkhu),
and they remain as monks for less than a year. Even a son's temporary
ordination as a bonze brings great merit to his parents, however, and is
considered so important that arrangements are made at a parent's funeral
if the son has not undergone the process while the parent was living.
There are two classes of bonzes at a wat--the novices (samani
or nen) and the bhikkhu. Ordination is held from
mid-April to mid-July, during the rainy season.
Buddhist monks do not take perpetual vows to remain monks, although,
in fact, some become monks permanently. Traditionally, they became monks
early in life. It is possible to become a novice at as young an age as
seven, but in practice thirteen is the earliest age for novices. A bhikkhu
must be at least twenty. The monk's life is regulated by Buddhist law,
and life in the wat adheres to a rigid routine. A bhikkhu
follows 227 rules of monastic discipline as well as the 10 basic
precepts. These include the five precepts that all Buddhists should
follow. The five precepts for monastic asceticism prohibit eating after
noon, participating in any entertainment (singing, dancing, and watching
movies or television), using any personal adornments, sleeping on a
luxurious bed, and handling money. In addition, a monk also is expected
to be celibate. Furthermore, monks supposedly avoid all involvement in
political affairs. They are not eligible to vote or to hold any
political office, and they may not witness a legal document or give
testimony in court. Since the person of a monk is considered sacred, he
is considered to be outside the normal civil laws and public duties that
affect lay people. Some of these practices have changed in the modern
period, however, and in the 1980s Buddhist monks have been active even
in the PRK government.
Women are not ordained, but older women, especially widows, can
become nuns. They live in wat and play an important role in the everyday
life of the temple. Nuns shave their heads and eyebrows and generally
follow the same precepts as monks. They may prepare the altars and do
some of the housekeeping chores.
Role of Buddhism in Cambodian Life
Buddhist monks traditionally were called upon to perform a number of
functions in Cambodian life. They participated in all formal village
festivals, ceremonies, marriages, and funerals. They also might have
participated in ceremonies to name infants and in other minor ceremonies
or rites of passage. Monks did not lead the ceremonies, however, because
that role was given to the achar, or master of ceremonies; the
monk's major function was to say prayers of blessing. They were often
healers and, in traditional Khmer culture, they were the practitioners
whose role was closest to that of modern psychiatrists. They might also
have been skilled in astrology. The monk traditionally occupied a unique
position in the transmission of Khmer culture and values. By his way of
life, he provided a living model of the most meritorious behavior a
Buddhist could follow. He also provided the laity with many
opportunities for gaining merit. For centuries monks were the only
literate people residing in rural communities; they acted as teachers to
temple servants, to novices, and to newly ordained monks. Until the
1970s, most literate Cambodian males gained literacy solely through the
instruction of the sangha.
After independence from France, young Cambodian intellectuals changed
their attitude toward the clergy. In describing a general shift away
from Buddhism in the late 1950s and the early 1960s, Vickery cites the
early work of anthropologist May Mayko Ebihara and his own observations.
He suggests that the Khmer Rouge was able to instill antireligious
feelings in younger males because the latter were losing interest in
becoming monks even during their teenage years, the traditional
temporary period of service. The monks themselves had abandoned some of
their traditional restrictions and had become involved in politics. At
intervals during the colonial period, some monks had demonstrated or had
rebelled against French rule, and in the 1970s monks joined pro-
government demonstrations against the communists. Anticlerical feelings
reached their highest point among the Khmer Rouge, who at first
attempted to indoctrinate monks and to force them to pass anticlerical
ideas on to the laity. Under the Khmer Rouge regime, monks were expelled
forcibly from the wats and were compelled to do manual labor. Article 20
of the 1976 Constitution of Democratic Kampuchea permitted freedom of
religion but banned all reactionary religions, that were
"detrimental to the country." The minister of culture stated
that Buddhism was incompatible with the revolution and was an instrument
of exploitation. Under this regime, to quote the Finnish Inquiry
Commission, "The practice of religion was forbidden and the pagodas
were systematically destroyed." Observers estimated that 50,000
monks died during the Khmer Rouge regime. The status of Buddhism and of
religion in general after the Vietnamese invasion was at least partially
similar to its status in pre-Khmer Rouge times.
According to Michael Vickery, who has written positively about the
PRK, public observance of Buddhism and of Islam has been reestablished,
and government policies allow Cambodians freedom to believe or not to
believe in Buddhism. Vickery cites some differences in this
reestablished Buddhism. Religious affairs are overseen by the PRK's
Kampuchean (or Khmer) United Front for National Construction and Defense
(KUFNCD), the mass organization that supports the state by organizing
women, youths, workers, and religious groups. In 1987 there was only a
single Buddhist order because the Thommayut order had not been revived.
The organization of the clergy also had been simplified. The sangharaja
(primate of the Buddhist clergy) had been replaced by a prathean
(chairman). Communities that wanted a wats had to apply to a local front
committee for permission. The wat were administered by a committee of
the local laity. Private funds paid for the restoration of the wats
damaged during the war and the Khmer Rouge era, and they supported the
restored wats. Monks were ordained by a hierarchy that has been
reconstituted since an initial ordination in September 1979 by a
delegation from the Buddhist community in Vietnam. The validity of this
ordination continues to be questioned. In general, there are only two to
four monks per wat, which is fewer than before 1975. In 1981 about 4,930
monks served in 740 wats in Cambodia. The Buddhist General Assembly
reported 7,000 monks in 1,821 active wats a year later. In 1969 by
contrast, observers estimated that 53,400 monks and 40,000 novice monks
served in more than 3,000 wats. Vickery sums up his observations on the
subject by noting that, "The government has kept its promise to
allow freedom for traditional Buddhism, but does not actively encourage
it."
Martin offers another, more pessimistic, view of the religious
situation in the late 1980s. In a 1986 study, she asserts that the PRK
showed outsiders only certain aspects of religious freedom; she also
states that the few wats that were restored had only two or three old
monks in residence and that public attendance was low. The monks were
allowed to leave the wats only for an hour in the mornings, to collect
their food, or during holy days. Lay people who practiced their faith
were about the same ages as the monks, and they were allowed to visit
the wats only in the evenings. A government circular had also instructed
civil servants to stop celebrating the traditional New Year Festival.
Some traditional Buddhist festivals still were tolerated, but the state
collected a 50 percent tithe on donations. Martin believes that Buddhism
was threatened externally by state repression and by nonsupport and
internally by invalid clergy. She noted that the two Buddhist superiors,
Venerable Long Chhim and Venerable Tep Vong, were both believed to be
from Vietnam. Venerable Tep Vong was concurrently the superior of the
Buddhist clergy, vice president of the PRK's Khmer National Assembly,
and vice president of the KUFNCD National Council. She quoted a refugee
from Batdambang as having said, "During the meetings, the Khmer
administrative authorities, accompanied by the Vietnamese experts, tell
you, `Religion is like poison, it's like opium; it's better to give the
money to the military, so they can fight'."
Buddhism is still strong among the various Cambodian refugee groups
throughout the world, although some younger monks, faced with the
distractions of a foreign culture, have chosen to leave the clergy and
have become laicized. In the United States in 1984, there were twelve
Cambodian wats with about twenty-one monks. In the 1980s, a Cambodian
Buddhist wat was constructed near Washington, D.C., financed by a
massive outpouring of donations from Cambodian Buddhists throughout
North America. This wat is one of the few outside Southeast Asia that
has the consecrated boundary within which ordinations may be performed.
Most of the major Cambodian annual festivals are connected with
Buddhist observances. The chol chnam (New Year Festival) takes
place in mid-April; it was one of the few festivals allowed under the
Khmer Rouge regime. The phchun ben, celebrated in September or
in October, is a memorial day for deceased ancestors and for close
friends. Meak bochea, in January or February, commemorates the
last sermon of the Buddha. Vissakh bochea, in April or in May,
is the triple anniversary of the birth, death, and enlightenment of the
Buddha. The chol vossa takes place in June or in July; it marks
the beginning of a penitential season during which the monks must remain
within the temple compounds. The kathen marks the end of this
season; celebrated in September, it features offerings, especially of
robes, to the monks. The kathen was still celebrated in the PRK
in the late 1980s.
Cambodian Buddhism exists side-by-side with, and to some extent
intermingles with, pre-Buddhist animism and Brahman practices. Most
Cambodians, whether or not they profess to be Buddhists (or Muslims),
believe in a rich supernatural world. When ill, or at other times of
crisis, or to seek supernatural help, Cambodians may enlist the aid of a
practitioner who is believed to be able to propitiate or obtain help
from various spirits. Local spirits are believed to inhabit a variety of
objects, and shrines to them may be found in houses, in Buddhist
temples, along roads, and in forests.
Several types of supernatural entities are believed to exist; they
make themselves known by means of inexplicable sounds or happenings.
Among these phenomena are khmoc (ghosts), pret and besach
(particularly nasty demons, the spirits of people who have died violent,
untimely, or unnatural deaths), arak (evil spirits, usually
female), neak ta (tutelary spirits residing in inanimate
objects), mneang phteah (guardians of the house), meba
(ancestral spirits), and mrenh kongveal (elf-like guardians of
animals). All spirits must be shown proper respect, and, with the
exception of the mneang phteah and mrenh kongveal,
they can cause trouble ranging from mischief to serious life-threatening
illnesses. An important way for living people to show respect for the
spirits of the dead is to provide food for the spirits. If this food is
not provided, the spirit can cause trouble for the offending person. For
example, if a child does not provide food for the spirit of its dead
mother, that spirit can cause misfortunes to happen to the child.
Aid in dealing with the spirit world may be obtained from a kru
(shaman or spirit practitioner), an achar (ritualist), thmup
(witch, sorcerer or sorceress), or a rup arak (medium, usually
male). The kru is a kind of sorcerer who prepares charms and
amulets to protect the wearer from harm. He can cure illnesses, find
lost objects, and prepare magic potions. Traditionally, Cambodians have
held strong beliefs about protective charms. Amulets are worn routinely
by soldiers to ward off bullets, for example. The kru are
believed to have the power to prepare an amulet and to establish a
supernatural link between it and the owner. A kru may acquire
considerable local prestige and power. Many kru are former
Buddhist monks.
Another kind of magical practitioner is the achar, a
specialist in ritual. He may function as a kind of master of ceremonies
at a wat and as a specialist in conducting spirit worship rituals
connected with life-cycle ceremonies. Rup arak are mediums who
can be possessed by supernatural beings and communicate with the spirit
world. The thmup are sorcerers who cause illnesses.
Fortunetellers and astrologers--haor teay--are important in
Cambodian life. They are consulted about important decisions such as
marriages, building a new house, or going on a long journey. They are
believed to be able to foretell future events and to determine lucky or
unlucky days for various activities.
Villagers are sensitive to the power and to the needs of the spirit
world. According to observations by an American missionary in the early
1970s, villagers consulted the local guardian spirit to find out what
the coming year would bring, a new province chief held a ceremony to ask
the protection of the spirits over the province, and soldiers obtained
magic cloths and amulets from mediums and shamans to protect them from
the bullets of the enemy. Before embarking on a mission against enemy
forces, a province chief might burn incense and call on a spirit for aid
in defeating the enemy. Examples of Brahman influences were various
rituals concerned with the well-being of the nation carried out by the
ruler and the baku (a Brahman priestly group attached to the
royal court). These rituals were reportedly stopped after Sihanouk's
ouster in 1970.
Cambodia - Chinese Religion
Public School System
Traditional education in Cambodia was handled by the local wat, and
the bonzes were the teachers. The students were almost entirely young
boys, and the education was limited to memorizing Buddhist chants in
Pali. During the period of the French protectorate, an educational
system based on the French model was inaugurated alongside the
traditional system. Initially, the French neglected education in
Cambodia. Only seven high school students graduated in 1931, and only
50,000 to 60,000 children were enrolled in primary school in 1936. In
the year immediately following independence, the number of students
rapidly increased. Vickery suggests that education of any kind was
considered an "absolute good" by all Cambodians and that this
attitude eventually created a large group of unemployed or underemployed
graduates by the late 1960s.
From the early twentieth century until 1975, the system of mass
education operated on the French model. The educational system was
divided into primary, secondary, higher, and specialized levels. Public
education was under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education, which
exercised full control over the entire system; it established syllabi,
hired and paid teachers, provided supplies, and inspected schools. An
inspector of primary education, who had considerable authority, was
assigned to each province. Cultural committees under the Ministry of
Education were responsible for "enriching the Cambodian
language."
Primary education, divided into two cycles of three years each, was
carried out in state-run and temple-run schools. Successful completion
of a final state examination led to the award of a certificate after
each cycle. The primary education curriculum consisted of arithmetic,
history, ethics, civics, drafting, geography, hygiene, language, and
science. In addition, the curriculum included physical education and
manual work. French language instruction began in the second year. Khmer
was the language of instruction in the first cycle, but French was used
in the second cycle and thereafter. By the early 1970s, Khmer was used
more widely in primary education. In the 1980s, primary school ran from
the first to the fourth grade. Theoretically one primary school served
each village. Secondary education also was divided into two cycles, one
of four years taught at a college, followed by one of three years taught
at a lyc�e. Upon completion of the first cycle, students could take a
state examination. Successful candidates received a secondary diploma.
Upon completion of the first two years of the second cycle, students
could take a state examination for the first baccalaureate, and,
following their final year, they could take a similar examination for
the second baccalaureate. The Cambodian secondary curriculum was similar
to that found in France. Beginning in 1967, the last three years of
secondary school were split up into three sections according to major
subjects--letters, mathematics and technology; agriculture; and biology.
In the late 1960s and the early 1970s, the country emphasized a
technical education. In the PRK, secondary education was reduced to six
years.
Higher education lagged well behind primary and secondary education,
until the late 1950s. The only facility in the country for higher
education before the 1960s was the National Institute of Legal,
Political, and Economic Studies, which trained civil servants. In the
late 1950s, it had about 250 students. Wealthy Cambodians and those who
had government scholarships sought university-level education abroad.
Students attended schools in France, but after independence increasing
numbers enrolled at universities in the United States, Canada, China,
the Soviet Union, and the German Democratic Republic (East Germany). By
1970 universities with a total enrollment of nearly 9,000 students
served Cambodia. The largest, the University of Phnom Penh, had nearly
4,570 male students and more than 730 female students in eight
departments--letters and humanities, science and technology, law and
economics, medicine, pharmacy, commercial science, teacher training, and
higher teacher training. Universities operated in the provinces of
Kampong Cham, Takev, Batdambang; and in Phnom Penh, the University of
Agricultural Sciences and the University of Fine Arts offered training.
The increased fighting following the 1970 coup closed the three
provincial universities.
During the Khmer Rouge regime, education was dealt a severe setback,
and the great strides made in literacy and in education during the two
decades following independence were obliterated systematically. Schools
were closed, and educated people and teachers were subjected to, at the
least, suspicion and harsh treatment and, at the worst, execution. At
the beginning of the 1970s, more than 20,000 teachers lived in Cambodia;
only about 5,000 of the teachers remained 10 years later. Soviet sources
report that 90 percent of all teachers were killed under the Khmer Rouge
regime. Only 50 of the 725 university instructors, 207 of the 2,300
secondary school teachers, and 2,717 of the 21,311 primary school
teachers survived. The meager educational fare was centered on precepts
of the Khmer revolution; young people were rigidly indoctrinated, but
literacy was neglected, and an entire generation of Cambodian children
grew up illiterate. After the Khmer Rouge were driven from power, the
educational system had to be re-created from almost nothing. Illiteracy
had climbed to more than 40 percent, and most young people under the age
of 14 lacked any basic education.
Education began making a slow comeback, following the establishment
of the PRK. In 1986 the following main institutions of higher education
were reported in the PRK: the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy (reopened
in 1980 with a six-year course of study); the Chamcar Daung Faculty of
Agriculture (opened in 1985); the Kampuchea-USSR Friendship Technical
Institute (which includes technical and engineering curricula), the
Institute of Languages (Vietnamese, German, Russian, and Spanish are
taught); the Institute of Commerce, the Center for Pedagogical Education
(formed in 1979); the Normal Advanced School; and the School of Fine
Arts. Writing about the educational system under the PRK, Vickery
states, "Both the government and the people have demonstrated
enthusiasm for education . . . . The list of subjects covered is little
different from that of prewar years. There is perhaps more time devoted
to Khmer language and literature than before the war and, until the
1984-85 school year, at least, no foreign language instruction." He
notes that the secondary school syllabus calls for four hours of foreign
language instruction per week in either Russian, German, or Vietnamese
but that there were no teachers available.
Martin describes the educational system in the PRK as based very
closely on the Vietnamese model, pointing out that even the terms for
primary and secondary education have been changed into direct
translations of the Vietnamese terms. Under the PRK regime, according to
Martin, the primary cycle had four instead of six classes, the first
level of secondary education had three instead of four classes, and the
second level of secondary education had three classes. Martin writes
that not every young person could go to school because schooling both in
towns and in the countryside required enrollment fees. Civil servants
pay 25 riels per month to send a child to school, and others pay up to
150 riels per month. Once again, according to Martin, "Access to
tertiary studies is reserved for children whose parents work for the
regime and have demonstrated proof of their loyalty to the regime."
She writes that, from the primary level on, the contents of all
textbooks except for alphabet books was politically oriented and dealt
"more specifically with Vietnam." From the beginning of the
secondary cycle, Vietnamese language study was compulsory.
Buddhist Education
Before the French organized a Western-style educational system, the
Buddhist wat, with monks as teachers, provided the only formal education
in Cambodia. The monks traditionally regarded their main educational
function as the teaching of Buddhist doctrine and history and the
importance of gaining merit. Other subjects were regarded as secondary.
At the wat schools, young boys--girls were not allowed to study in these
institutions--were taught to read and to write Khmer, and they were
instructed in the rudiments of Buddhism.
In 1933 a secondary school system for novice monks was created within
the Buddhist religious system. Many wat schools had so-called Pali
schools that provided three years of elementary education from which the
student could compete for entrance into the Buddhist lyc�es. Graduates
of these lyc�es could sit for the entrance examination to the Buddhist
University in Phnom Penh. The curriculum of the Buddhist schools
consisted of the study of Pali, of Buddhist doctrine, and of Khmer,
along with mathematics, Cambodian history and geography, science,
hygiene, civics, and agriculture. Buddhist instruction was under the
authority of the Ministry of Religion.
Nearly 600 Buddhist primary schools, with an enrollment of more than
10,000 novices and with 800 monks as instructors, existed in 1962. The
Preah Suramarit Buddhist Lyc�e--a four-year institution in Phnom Penh
founded in 1955--included courses in Pali, in Sanskrit, and in Khmer, as
well as in many modern disciplines. In 1962 the student body numbered
680. The school's graduates could continue their studies in the Preah
Sihanouk Raj Buddhist University created in 1959. The university offered
three cycles of instruction; the doctoral degree was awarded after
successful completion of the third cycle. In 1962 there were 107
students enrolled in the Buddhist University. By the 1969-70 academic
year, more than 27,000 students were attending Buddhist religious
elementary schools, 1,328 students were at Buddhist lyc�es, and 176
students were enrolled at the Buddhist University.
The Buddhist Institute was a research institution formed in 1930 from
the Royal Library. The institute contained a library, record and
photograph collections, and a museum. Several commissions were part of
the institute. A folklore commission published collections of Cambodian
folktales, a Tripitaka Commission completed a translation of the
Buddhist canon into Khmer, and a dictionary commission produced a
definitive two-volume dictionary of Khmer. No information was available
in 1987 regarding the fate of the temple schools, but it is doubtful
that they were revived after the fall of the Khmer Rouge regime.
Private Education
For a portion of the urban population in Cambodia, private education
was important in the years before the communist takeover. Some private
schools were operated by ethnic or religious minorities--Chinese,
Vietnamese, European, Roman Catholic, and Muslim--so that children could
study their own language, culture, or religion. Other schools provided
education to indigenous children who could not gain admission to a
public school. Attendance at some of the private schools, especially
those in Phnom Penh, conferred a certain amount of prestige on the
student and on the student's family.
The private educational system included Chinese-language schools,
Vietnamese-language (often Roman Catholic) schools, French-language
schools, English-language schools, and Khmerlanguage schools. Enrollment
in private primary schools rose from 32,000 in the early 1960s to about
53,500 in 1970, although enrollment in private secondary schools dropped
from about 19,000 to fewer than 8,700 for the same period. In 1962 there
were 195 Chinese schools, 40 Khmer schools, 15 Vietnamese schools, and
14 French schools operating in Cambodia. Private secondary education was
represented by several high schools, notably the Lyc�e Descartes in
Phnom Penh.
All of the Vietnamese schools in Phnom Penh and some of the Chinese
schools there were closed by government decree in 1970. There was no
information available in 1987 that would have indicated the presence of
any private schools in the PRK, although there was some private
instruction, especially in foreign languages.
Cambodia - HEALTH AND WELFARE
The government made a great effort to train new medical personnel,
especially nurses and midwives, following independence in 1953. By the
late 1950s, however, infant mortality reportedly was as high as 50
percent. Dysentery, malaria, yaws, tuberculosis, trachoma, various skin
diseases, and parasitic diseases were common. Inadequate nutrition, poor
sanitary conditions, poor hygiene practices, and a general lack of
adequate medical treatment combined to give the average Cambodian a life
expectancy of about forty-six years by the late 1960s. This figure
represented a significant increase from the thirty-year life expectancy
reported a decade earlier. The catastrophic effects of the war and Khmer
Rouge rule reversed this positive trend. During the unrest, many
Western-trained physicians were killed or fled the country. Modern
medicines were in short supply, and traditional herbal remedies were
used.
Public Health
According to traditional Cambodian beliefs, disease may be caused by
some underlying spiritual cause. Evil spirits or "bad air" are
believed to cause many diseases and can be expelled from the body of a
sick person by trained practitioners, who may be traditional
healers--bonzes, former bonzes, herbalists, folk healers--or
Western-trained doctors and nurses. Aside from a wide variety of herbal
remedies, traditional healing practices include scraping the skin with a
coin, ring, or other small object; sprinkling or spraying water on the
sick person; and prayer. The use of cupping glasses (in French, ventouse)
continued in widespread use in the late 1980s.
Sanitation practices in rural Cambodia are often primitive. The water
supply is the main problem; rivers and streams are common sources of
drinking water and of water for cooking. These water sources are often
the same ones used for bathing, washing clothes, and disposing of waste
products. Adequate sewage disposal is nonexistent in most rural and
suburban areas. Sanitary conditions in the largest urban areas--Phnom
Penh, Batdambang city, and Kampong Cham city--were much improved over
the conditions in the rural areas, however. By the early 1970s, Phnom
Penh had three water purification plants, which were adequate for the
peacetime population but could not provide safe water when the city's
population increased significantly in the mid-1970s. The city had
regular garbage collection, and sewage was usually disposed of in septic
tanks.
The medical situation in Cambodia faced its first crisis at the time
of independence in 1953. Many French medical personnel departed, and few
trained Cambodians were left to replace them. In addition to a lack of
personnel, a shortage of medical supplies and facilities threatened
health care. To correct the first problem, in 1953 the government
established a school of medicine and a school of nursing, the Royal
Faculty of Medicine of Cambodia (which became the Faculty of Medicine,
Pharmacy, and Paramedical Science in 1972, and probably the Faculty of
Medicine and Pharmacy which reopened in 1980). The first class of
candidates for the degree of doctor of medicine was enrolled in 1958. In
1962 this school became part of the University of Phnom Penh, and in
1967 it expanded its teaching program to include training for dentists
and for medical specialists. By the late 1960s, trained Cambodian
instructors began replacing foreign personnel at the Faculty of
Medicine, and by 1971 thirty-three Cambodian medical instructors
represented in sixteen specialized branches of medical study.
A school for training nurses and midwives was operating before 1970.
This institution also trained sanitation agents, who received four years
of medical training with emphasis on sanitation and on preventive
medicine. These agents provided medical services for areas where there
were no doctors or clinics. The number of nurses trained almost
quintupled between 1955 and 1970. In Cambodia, nursing careers had been
primarily reserved for men, but the number of women entering the field
greatly increased after 1955. Midwives delivered almost half of the
babies in the early 1970s. In March 1970, eighty-one pharmacists
practiced in government-controlled areas. By 1971 the number had dropped
to sixty three.
Cambodia never has had an adequate number of hospitals or clinics. In
1930 there was only a single 450-bed hospital serving Phnom Penh. By
1953 however, 122 public medical establishments operated in Cambodia,
and, between 1955 and 1970, many improvements were made by the royal
government. Old hospital buildings were replaced or repaired, and new
ones were constructed. In 1962 provincial hospitals, along with many
infirmaries, operated in all but three provincial capitals. By March
1970, 29 hospitals, with a total of 6,186 beds, were in operation; by
September 1971, however, only 13 still functioned.
Phnom Penh had greater hospital resources than other parts of the
country. In the late 1960s, hospitals served inhabitants in the
surrounding area as well as residents of the city. At that time, seven
hospitals (including five teaching institutions), several private
clinics, twenty-two public dispensaries or infirmaries, and six military
infirmaries operated as well. The major hospitals in Phnom Penh were the
Preah Ket Mealea Hospital, the largest in the country with 1,000 beds,
which was built in 1893; the 500-bed Soviet-Khmer Friendship Hospital,
built in 1960; the Preah Monivong military hospital complexes; the
French-operated Calmette Hospital; a Buddhist monks' hospital; and a
Chinese hospital. Eight of the eighteen operating theaters in Cambodia
in the late 1960s were in Phnom Penh.
A leprosarium in Kampong Cham Province provided care for about 2,000
patients, and the Sonn Mann Mental Hospital at Ta Khmau provided care
for 300 patients. In 1971 Sonn Mann had about 1,100 patients and a staff
of six doctors, twenty-two nurses, one midwife, fifty-four
administrative employees, and eighty-nine guards.
Modern medical practices and pharmaceuticals have been scarce in
Cambodia since the early 1970s. The situation deteriorated so badly
between 1975 and 1979 that the population had to resort to traditional
remedies. A Cambodian refugee described a hospital in Batdambang
Province in the early days of the Khmer Rouge regime: "...the sick
were thrown into a big room baptized `Angkar Hospital,' where conditions
were miserable. Phnom Srok had one, where there were 300 to 600 sick
people `nursed' by Red Khmer, who used traditional medicines produced
from all sorts of tree rooths [sic]. Only few stayed alive. The Red
Khmer explained to us that the healing methods of our ancestors must be
used and that nothing should be taken from the Western medicine."
International aid produced more medicine after 1979, and there was a
flourishing black market in medicines, especially antibiotics, at
exorbitant prices. Three small pharmaceutical factories in Phnom Penh in
1983 produced about ten tons of pharmaceuticals. Tetracycline and
ampicillin were being produced in limited amounts in Phnom Penh,
according to 1985 reports. The PRK government emphasized traditional
medicine to cover the gap in its knowledge of modern medical
technologies. Each health center on the province, district, and
subdistrict level had a kru (teacher), specializing in
traditional herbal remedies, attached to it. An inventory of medicinal
plants was being conducted in each province in the late 1980s.
In 1979 according to observer Andrea Panaritis, of the more than 500
physicians practicing in Cambodia before 1975, only 45 remained. In the
same year, 728 students returned to the Faculty of Medicine. The
faculty, with practically no trained Cambodian instructors available,
relied heavily on teachers, advisers, and material aid from Vietnam.
Classes were being conducted in both Khmer and French; sophisticated
Western techniques and surgical methods were taught alongside
traditional Khmer healing methods. After some early resistance, the
medical faculty and students seemed to have accepted the importance of
preventive medicine and public health. The improvement in health care
under the PRK was illustrated by a Soviet report about the hospital in
Kampong Spoe. In 1979 it had a staff of three nurses and no doctor. By
1985 the hospital had a thirty-three-member professional staff that
included a physician from Vietnam and two doctors and three nurses from
Hungary. The Soviet-Khmer Friendship Hospital reopened with sixty beds
in mid-1982. By 1983 six adequate civilian hospitals in Phnom Penh and
nineteen dispensaries scattered around the capital provided increasing
numbers of medical services. Well-organized provincial hospitals also
were reported in Batdambang, Takev, Kampong Thum, and Kandal provinces.
Panaritis reports that rudimentary family planning existed in the PRK in
the mid-1980s, and that obstetrics stressed prenatal and nutritional
care. The government did not actively promote birth control, but
requests for abortions and tubal ligations have been noted in some
reports. Condoms and birth control pills were available, although the
pills had to be brought in from Bangkok or Singapore.
As of late 1987, the government in Phnom Penh had disseminated no
information on the spread of the Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome
(AIDS or HIV virus) in Cambodia. In addition, the list of common
illnesses in Cambodia, as reported by international organizations, does
not mention Karposi's sarcoma and pneumo-cystic pneumonia (PCP), the
most common complications resulting from infection by the HIV virus. The
risk to the Cambodian population of contamination by carriers of the HIV
virus carriers comes from two sources. The more likely of the two
consists of infected, illegal border-crossers, including insurgents,
from Thailand, where authorities identified a hundred cases of AIDS in
1987 (triple the number in 1986). Less likely is the risk of infection
from legal travelers. Cambodia remains a closed country, and access by
foreigners (except for Vietnamese, Soviet, and East European visitors)
is limited to a few scholars and to members of international and private
aid organizations.
Welfare Programs
Steinberg cites twelfth-century King Jayavarman VII as having begun a
public welfare system in Cambodia. Jayavarman built public rest houses
along the roads, distributed rice to the needy, and banned tax
collectors from places where the sick were cared for.
Beginning in 1936, the French colonial authorities passed legislation
affecting the hours of work, the wages, and the worker's compensation
for foreign employees. Later, Cambodians were covered. A system of
family allotments was instituted in 1955. Under this system, employers
were required to contribute a monthly sum for the welfare of the
worker's family.
A few welfare organizations were established in Cambodia under the
Sihanouk regime. In 1949 the National Mutual Help Association was
founded to provide money, food, and clothing to the needy. In 1951 the
Cambodian Red Cross was organized to provide aid to disaster victims,
especially those suffering from floods. The Women's Mutual Health
Association was formed in 1953. It was associated with the Preah Ket
Mealea Hospital in Phnom Penh, where it provided prenatal and child
care. During the 1950s, the Association of Vietnamese in Cambodia opened
a dispensary in Phnom Penh. The most ubiquitous source of assistance for
the average Cambodian, however, was the network of Buddhist wats that
extended down to the grass roots level. Also, relatives and, in the case
of the Chinese, extended families and business associations provided
assistance to needy members.
In the PRK under the government's gradual evolution toward
Marxist-Leninist socialism, the ability of the wat to extend charitable
aid was seriously impaired because these institutions existed in
conditions of near penury, following their active suppression under the
Khmer Rouge, and they were barely tolerated by the PRK regime. Instead,
fragmentary evidence suggests that public welfare was decentralized and,
because of the paucity of resources, received only small amounts in
funds from the central government. According to available literature,
the care of needy persons was entrusted to local party and government
committees and, at the lowest echelon, to krom samaki
(solidarity groups). Leaders at these grass-roots levels thus were able
to evaluate true need and to extend aid varying from in-kind assistance
to informal job placement. Such decentralization avoided the
bureaucratization of welfare but, at the same time, it carried its own
potential for abuse because aid could be apportioned on the basis of
fidelity to regime and to party, or even to enforce loyalty to local
leaders. The extension to the local level of such social services,
however, indicated that the PRK was slowly extending its presence in the
countryside, thus reinforcing its claim of nationhood, and its control
over its territory and over Cambodian society at large.
Cambodia - The Economy
Sihanouk's political neutrality, which formed the cornerstone of his
foreign policy, had a significant effect on Cambodia's economic
development. Sihanouk insisted that the economic dimension of neutrality
meant either total rejection of international aid (as practiced by Burma
under Ne Win) or acceptance of foreign economic assistance from all
countries without strings attached. Indeed, during the first decade that
he was in power in newly independent Cambodia (1953-63), the prince
carefully practiced his "purer form of neutrality between East and
West" in seeking foreign economic assistance for development.
In 1963 however, Cambodia's economy started to stagnate when Sihanouk
decided to link his economic neutrality policy to the country's
territorial integrity and border security. He rejected further
assistance from the United States, because Washington supported the
Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam), and from Thailand, with which
Cambodia had continuous frontier disputes. In a related move, Sihanouk
nationalized trading companies, banks, insurance, and major industries,
thereby causing economic deterioration between 1963 and 1969. The 1967
Samlot (Batdambang) revolt and the February 1970 government decision to
demonetize (or exchange) the old 500 riel banknotes were crucial events contributing to the end of the
Sihanouk era.
During his tenure after independence, Sihanouk used the country's
ill-defined constitution to monitor all government activities of any
consequence and to bend the government's decision-making process to his
advantage. During the course of nation building, political aims often
prevailed over strictly economic objectives. For example, prior to 1967,
the government assigned higher priority to social improvements, such as
health and education, than it did to national economic growth. The
government later gave higher priority to the productive sectors of
agriculture and industry in economic plans for the 1968-72 periods;
however, because of war, the government did not implement these plans.
Nonetheless, between 1952 and 1969, Cambodia's gross national product
(GNP) grew an average of 5 percent a year in real terms, with growth
higher during the 1950s than during the 1960s. In addition, the service
sector played an important role in Sihanouk's mixed economic system in
contrast to its position under the regimes of Pol Pot and of Heng
Samrin, who considered the service sector insignificant and
"unproductive." In 1968 the service sector accounted for more
than 15 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), agriculture accounted for 36 percent, and manufacturing for
12 percent.
Agriculture developed under a degree of paternalism from Sihanouk,
who donated farm equipment to various villages and, in return, received
respect and affection from the peasants. In general, however, Cambodian
agriculture subsisted without much help from the government. In 1969
approximately 80 percent of rice farmers owned the land they cultivated,
and the landholding for each family averaged slightly more than two
hectares. The farmers used simple and rudimentary implements that were
well suited to their needs and to the light weight of their draft
animals. Overall, the peasants were remarkably self-sufficient.
Farmers began to cultivate more land, causing rice production to
increase from an average of 1.4 million tons in 1955 to 2.4 million tons
in 1960. Production remained at that level throughout the 1960s. Rice
yield per hectare, however, remained low--less than 1.2 tons per
hectare--during the 1952-69 period little was done to increase yield
through the use of irrigation, chemical fertilizers, or improved seeds
and implements. Average yields in Batdambang and Kampong Cham provinces,
however, were 50 percent higher than the national average because of
better soil fertility and, in the case of Batdambang, larger average
landholdings and greater use of machines in cultivation.
Industrial and infrastructural development benefited from foreign
economic assistance. In general, the government avoided ambitious plans
and focused on small enterprises to meet local needs and to reduce
foreign imports. In June 1956, the Chinese provided Phnom Penh with
US$22.4 million in equipment as part of an ongoing program of industrial
economic assistance. In addition, they helped build a textile mill and a
glass plant in the 1960s. During this period, other nations contributed
through aid programs of their own. Czechoslovakia granted loans for the
construction of tractor assembly plants, tire-production facilities, and
a sugar refinery. Other aid donors were the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia,
France, the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany), Japan, and
Australia. United States economic assistance to Cambodia amounted to
more than US$350 million for the 1955 to 1962 period, and it was
invested mostly in the areas of public health, education, and
agricultural development. To avoid the appearance of undue dependence
upon foreign aid, Cambodia insisted upon "project sharing,"
that is, participation of its own in specific enterprises, such as the
French-sponsored oil refinery and truck assembly plant at Sihanoukville.
This stipulation imposed by Phnom Penh also had the effect of holding
down the scale of many aid projects and the amounts of loans extended to
the Cambodian government.
The government also used foreign assistance to expand the country's
transportation and communication networks. France helped to develop
Sihanoukville, Cambodia's second largest port, which opened in 1960, and
the United States constructed a highway linking the port to Phnom Penh.
In addition, the Cambodians, with French and West German assistance,
built a railway from Sihanoukville to the capital.
Despite Sihanouk's claims of economic progress, Cambodia's industrial
output in 1968 amounted to only 12 percent of GNP, or only one-third of
agricultural production. Rice and rubber were the country's two
principal commodity exports and foreign-exchange earners during the
Sihanouk era.
Cambodia - The Wartime Economy, 1970-75
Under the leadership of the Khmer Rouge, Cambodia underwent a brutal
and radical revolution. When the communist forces took power in Phnom
Penh in April 1975, their immediate goals were to overhaul the social
system and to revitalize the national economy. The economic development
strategy of the Khmer Rouge was to build a strong agricultural base
supported by local small industries and handicrafts. As explained by
Deputy Premier Ieng Sary, the regime was "pursuing radical
transformation of the country, with agriculture as the base. With
revenues from agriculture we are building industry which is to serve the
development of agriculture." This strategy was also the focus of a
doctoral thesis written by future Khmer Rouge leader Khieu Samphan at
the University of Paris in 1959. Samphan argued that Cambodia could only
achieve economic and industrial development by increasing and expanding
agricultural production. The new communist government implemented the
tenets of this thesis; it called for a total collectivization of
agriculture and for a complete nationalization of all sectors of the
economy.
Strict adherence to the principle of self-reliance constituted the
central goal of the Khmer Rouge regime. A Phnom Penh radio broadcast in
early May (about a month after the Khmer Rouge arrived in the capital)
underscored the importance of Cambodian self- reliance and boasted that
during the war the Khmer Rouge had used scrap iron and wrecked military
vehicles to manufacture their own bullets and mines. The statement made
it clear that the policy of self-reliance would continue in peacetime.
In another move aimed at reducing foreign influence on the country, the
regime announced on May 10 that it would not allow foreigners to remain
in Cambodia but that the measure was only temporary; and it added,
"We shall reconsider the question [of allowing foreigners to enter
the country] after the re-establishment of diplomatic, economic and
commercial relations with other countries." Although Cambodia
resumed diplomatic relations with a number of nations, the new
government informed the UN General Assembly on October 6, 1975, that it
was neutral and economically self-sufficient and would not ask for aid
from any country. On September 9, however, the Chinese ambassador
arrived in Cambodia, and there were soon reports that China was
providing aid to the Khmer Rouge. Estimates of the number of Chinese
experts in Cambodia after that time ranged from 500 to 2,000. The policy
of self-reliance also meant that the government organized the entire
population into forced-labor groups to work in paddies and on other land
to help the country reach its goal of food self-sufficiency.
The Khmer Rouge, as soon as it took power on April 17, 1975, emptied
Phnom Penh (of its approximately 2 million residents) as well as other
cities and towns, and forced the people into the countryside. This
overnight evacuation was motivated by the urgent need to rebuild the
country's war-torn economy and by the Khmer Rouge peasantry's hostility
toward the cities. According to a Khmer Rouge spokesman at the French
embassy on May 10, the evacuation was necessary to
"revolutionize" and to "purify" the urban residents
and to annihilate Phnom Penh, which "Cambodian peasants regarded as
a satellite of foreigners, first French, and then American, and which
has been built with their sweat without bringing them anything in
exchange." The only people who were not ordered to leave the city
were those who operated essential public services, such as water and
electricity.
Other Khmer Rouge leaders rationalized the evacuation as a matter of
self-reliance. They told the Swedish ambassador in early 1976 that
"they didn't have any transportation facilities to bring food to
the people, and so the logical thing was to bring the people to the
food, i.e., to evacuate them all and make them get out into the
ricefields." Indeed, when the evacuees reached their destinations,
they were immediately mobilized to clear land, to harvest rice crops, to
dig and restore irrigation canals, and to build and repair dikes in
preparation for the further expansion of agriculture. The rice crop in
November 1976 was reported to be good in relation to earlier years. At
the same time, plantations producing cotton, rubber, and bananas were
established or rehabilitated.
While the Khmer Rouge gave high priority to agriculture, it neglected
industry. Pol Pot sought "to consolidate and perfect [existing]
factories," rather than to build new ones. About 100 factories and
workshops were put back into production; most of them (except a
Chinese-built cement plant, a gunnysack factory, and textile mills in
Phnom Penh and in Batdambang) were repair and handicraft shops revived
to facilitate agricultural development.
Cambodia's economic revolution was much more radical and ambitious
than that in any other communist country. In fact, Khmer Rouge leader
Premier Ieng Sary explained that Cambodia wanted "to create
something that never was before in history. No model exists for what we
are building. We are not imitating either the Chinese or the Vietnamese
model." The state or cooperatives owned all land; there were no
private plots as in China or in the Soviet Union. The constitution,
adopted in December 1975 and proclaimed in January 1976, specifically
stated that the means of production were the collective property of the
state.
The Cambodian economic system was unique in at least two respects.
First, the government abolished private ownership of land. The Khmer
Rouge believed that, under the new government, Cambodia should be a
classless society of "perfect harmony" and that private
ownership was "the source of egoist feelings and consequently
social injustices." Second, Cambodia was a cashless nation; the
government confiscated all republican era currency. Shops closed, and
workers received their pay in the form of food rations, because there
was no money in circulation.
On August 12, 1975, fewer than four months after the Khmer Rouge had
taken power, Khieu Samphan claimed that, within a year or two, Cambodia
would have sufficient food supplies and would be able to export some of
its products. To achieve this goal in record time, large communes
comprising several villages replaced village cooperatives, which had
formed in the areas controlled by the Khmer Rouge in 1973 and which had
spread throughout the country by 1975. Unlike China and Vietnam, which
had introduced collectivization gradually over several years, Cambodia
imposed the system hastily and without preparation.
The Khmer Rouge, in line with the slogan, "If we have dikes, we
will have water; if we have water, we will have rice; if we have rice,
we can have absolutely everything," organized the workers into
three "forces." The first force comprised unmarried men (ages
fifteen to forty) who were assigned to construct canals, dikes, and
dams. The second force consisted of married men and women who were
responsible for growing rice near villages. The third force was made up
of people forty years of age and older who were assigned to less arduous
tasks, such as weaving, basket-making, or watching over the children.
Children under the age of fifteen grew vegetables or raised poultry.
Everyone had to work between ten and twelve hours a day, and some worked
even more, often under adverse, unhealthy conditions.
On September 27, 1977, in a major speech celebrating the anniversary
of the Kampuchean (or Khmer) Communist Party (KCP), Khmer Rouge leader Pol Pot asserted that, "Our entire
people, our entire revolutionary army and all our cadres live under a
collective regime through a communal support system." He then
listed the government's achievements in rebuilding the economy and
concluded that, "Though not yet to the point of affluence, our
people's standard of living has reached a level at which people are
basically assured of all needs in all fields."
Measuring the economic performance of the Khmer Rouge regime was
impossible because statistics were not available, and no monetary
transactions or bookkeeping were carried out. The economic life
described by foreign diplomats, by Western visitors, and by Cambodian
refugees in Thai camps ranged from spartan to dismal. Phnom Penh became
a ghost town of only about 10,000 people. There were no shops, post
offices, telephones, or telegraph services. Frequent shortages of water
and of electricity occurred in all urban areas, and the government
prohibited movement across provincial borders, except for that of trucks
distributing rice and fuel.
Conditions in the cooperatives varied considerably from place to
place. In some areas, cooperative members had permission to cultivate
private plots of land and to keep livestock. In others, all property was
held communally. Conditions were most primitive in the new economic
zones, where city dwellers had been sent to farm virgin soil and where
thousands of families lived in improvised barracks.
Cambodia made progress in improving the country's irrigation network
and in expanding its rice cultivation area. Phnom Penh radio claimed
that a network of ditches, canals, and reservoirs had been constructed
throughout the country "like giant checkerboards, a phenomenon
unprecedented in the history of our Cambodia." Still, rice
production and distribution were reported to be unsatisfactory. Rice
harvests were poor in 1975 and 1978, when the worst floods in seventy
years struck the Mekong Valley. Even after the better harvests of 1976
and 1977, however, rice distribution was unequal, and the government
failed to reach the daily ration of 570 grams per person. (The daily
ration of rice per person actually varied by region from 250 to 500
grams.) Party leaders, cadres, soldiers, and factory workers ate well,
but children, the sick, and the elderly suffered from malnutrition and
starvation. There also were reports that the government was stockpiling
rice in preparation for war with Vietnam and exporting it to China in
exchange for military supplies. This diverted rice could have been one
explanation for the people's meager rice ration.
At the end of 1978, when Vietnamese troops invaded Cambodia, the
ensuing turbulence completely disrupted the nation's economic activity,
particularly in the countryside, which once again became a war theater
traversed by a massive population movement. Agricultural production was
again a major casualty, with the result that there was a severe food
crisis in 1979.
Cambodia - ECONOMIC ROLE OF THE KPRP
After the fall of Pol Pot and the establishment of the People's
Republic of Kampuchea in January 1979, the Kampuchean (or Khmer)
People's Revolutionary Party (KPRP), led by General Secretary Heng
Samrin, set Cambodia's economic development policies. Party congresses
adopted these policies at meetings in January 1979, May 1981, and
October 1985. A new Constitution, which the National Assembly approved
in June 1981, defined Cambodia's new socialist direction and the role of
the state in economic affairs. Then, after six more years of struggling
with an economy of survival and subsistence, KPRP leaders presented
their First Plan, which represented a systematic and rational party
effort at centrally planning and improving the economy.
New Economic Policy and System
In contrast to Pol Pot's radical, doctrinaire approach to economic
development, Heng Samrin and the leaders of the Kampuchean (or Khmer)
National United Front for National Salvation (KNUFNS), the umbrella
group of anti-Pol Pot forces sponsored by Hanoi, sought to rally public
support by formulating a policy that would be pragmatic, realistic, and
flexible. In an eleven-point program promulgated shortly before the
Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia, the front articulated the economic
guidelines that would mark its tenure in power. These guidelines
advocated a gradual transformation to socialism; a "planned economy
with markets"; the restoration of banks, of currency, and of trade;
the abolition of forced labor; the introduction of an eight-hour
workday; and pay based on work performed.
The KPRP socialist economy accepted the private sector. At a May 1980
agriculture conference, Samrin reviewed the effectiveness of the
solidarity groups (krom samaki), production units of seven to
fifteen families, united in a common endeavor to raise food or to
produce goods. These production units had been organized in line with
the policy of moving toward socialism. He affirmed that each member of
these groups would receive at least one hectare of land to cultivate for
communal purposes, plus a private plot not exceeding a quarter of a
hectare on which to grow vegetables or to graze livestock. Also, a July
1980 planning conference called for a policy of "simultaneous
development of family (private) economy and national (socialized)
economy." The conference also decided that the state should buy
agricultural products from the peasants and should sell them
manufactured goods at free-market prices.
The KPRP further clarified its economic policy at its Fourth Party
Congress (its first since taking power in Phnom Penh) from May 26 to May
29, 1981. It declared that the nation's economic system had three main
parts--the state economy, the collective economy, and the family
economy, and that each of these parts "had its own significant
role."
The state economy covered large-scale agricultural production, all
industrial production, the communications and transportation networks,
finance, and domestic and foreign trade. To facilitate economic
transactions nationwide, the state restored the banking system in
November 1979, and it reintroduced currency in March 1980. The KPRP
acknowledged that the state economy was small and said that it should be
expanded. The party leaders, however, aware of the pitfalls of central
planning, warned against "over-expansion and disregard for real
needs, production conditions, management ability, and economic
capability."
The collective economy--the largest of the three elements--was
assigned an important role in agricultural rehabilitation and
development. It consisted of solidarity groups in agriculture, fishing,
forestry, and handicrafts. These groups also assumed the task of
collective purchase and sale.
The family-run economy included the home economies of the peasants,
most retail businesses, individual artisans, handicrafts, repair shops,
and small trade. Although the 1981 Constitution stated that the land and
other natural resources were state property, it gave the citizens
usufruct rights to land allotted for a house and garden by the state. In
some cases, agricultural workers were also allowed to borrow an extra
plot of land from the state, to produce food on it, and to keep the
harvest for their own consumption.
Private enterprise also made a modest beginning under Cambodia's
hybrid economic system. Citizens were allowed to buy and to sell
agricultural produce and handicrafts. The law guaranteed workers the
right to keep their wages, their other income and their property.
Encouraged and protected by the state, hundreds of small shops and
factories, each employing a few workers, opened for business in Phnom
Penh and in other urban areas.
This inchoate private sector played such an important role in the
national economic recovery that party leaders urged its official
recognition, at the Fifth Congress in October 1985, as a means of
mitigating the weaknesses of the state-run economy. Thus, the government
added a fourth component--private economy--to the economic system and
legitimized it with a constitutional amendment in February 1986.
First Plan, 1986-90
The First Five-Year Program of Socioeconomic Restoration and
Development (1986-90), or First Plan, originated in February 1984, when
the heads of the state planning commissions of Vietnam, Laos, and
Cambodia met in Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon) and agreed to
coordinate their 1986 to 1990 economic plans. Heng Samrin formally
announced Cambodia's plan in his political report to the congress.
The plan was intended to open a new phase of the Cambodian
revolution; it gave highest priority to agricultural production, calling
it "the first front line," and focused on the four sectors of
food, rubber, fishing, and timber. It set production targets for each
sector. During the plan period, food production was to increase 7
percent a year to keep up with a targeted 2.8 percent annual population
growth rate, which did not seem to have been reached by 1987. The plan
projected that by 1990, rubber farming would expand to 50,000 hectares
in order to produce 50,000 tons of latex; timber production would reach
200,000 cubic meters; jute production would increase to 15,000 tons; and
fish production would amount to 130,000 tons. As in the past, the plan
labeled agriculture and forestry as the real force of the national
economy.
The plan was less specific for the industrial sector. It did not set
industrial production targets, except that for electrical output, which
was projected to reach 300 million kilowatt hours per year in 1990. The
plan called attention to the need for selective restoration of existing
industrial production capabilities and for proposed progressive
construction of a small to medium industrial base, which would be more
appropriate to the country's situation.
The plan placed increased emphasis on the distribution of goods.
Trade organizations were to be perfected at all levels, and socialist
trading networks were to be expanded in all localities. In particular,
the trade relationship between the state and the peasantry was to be
improved and consolidated in accordance with the motto, "For the
peasantry, selling rice and agricultural products to the state is
patriotism; for the state, selling goods and delivering them directly to
the people is being responsible to the people."
The plan also required that investment be directed toward the
improvement of the infrastructure, particularly toward the
reconstruction of communication lines and waterworks. Road, inland
waterways, and railroad networks had to be restored to serve the
national economy and defense.
Last, but not least, the plan cited "export and thrift"
(without elaboration), as the two primary policies to be followed in
order to solve the national budget deficit. The plan implied that, into
the 1990s, exports would have to consist principally of agricultural and
forestry products, to which some value might be added by low-technology
processing. "Thrift," although undefined, could, in the
future, include some kind of government savings plan, with incentives
for small depositors, to absorb surplus riels generated by Cambodia's
considerable free-market and black-market sectors.
Heng Samrin, like his predecessors, Sihanouk and Pol Pot, urged
Cambodians to undertake the task of economic restoration "in the
spirit of mainly relying on one's own forces." Unlike Sihanouk and
Pol Pot, however, the KPRP leader stressed economic and technical
cooperation with Vietnam. He believed such cooperation would be "an
indispensable factor" in the development of agriculture and of
forestry in Cambodia. Heng Samrin also advocated better economic
cooperation with the Soviet Union and with other socialist countries.
Cambodia - AGRICULTURE
Agriculture, accounting for 90 percent of GDP in 1985 and employing
approximately 80 percent of the work force, is the traditional mainstay
of the economy. Rice, the staple food, continued to be the principal
commodity in this sector. Rice production, a vital economic indicator in
Cambodia's agrarian society, frequently fell far short of targets,
causing severe food shortages in 1979, 1981, 1984, and 1987. The plan's
1987 target for the total area to be devoted to rice cultivation was
1.77 million hectares, but the actual area under cultivation in 1987
amounted to only 1.15 million hectares. After 1979 and through the late
1980s, the agricultural sector performed poorly. Adverse weather
conditions, insufficient numbers of farm implements and of draft
animals, inexperienced and incompetent personnel, security problems, and
government collectivization policies all contributed to low
productivity.
Collectivization and Solidarity Groups
Collectivization of the agricultural sector under the Heng Samrin
regime included the formation of solidarity groups. As small aggregates
of people living in the same locality, known to one another, and able to
a certain extent to profit collectively from their work, they were an
improvement over the dehumanized, forcedlabor camps and communal life of
the Pol Pot era. The organization of individuals and families into
solidarity groups also made sense in the environment of resources-poor,
postwar Cambodia. People working together in this way were able to
offset somewhat the shortages of manpower, draft animals, and farm
implements.
In 1986 more than 97 percent of the rural population belonged to the
country's more than 100,000 solidarity groups. Unlike the large communes
of the Khmer Rouge, the solidarity groups were relatively small. They
consisted initially of between twenty and fifty families and were later
reduced to between seven and fifteen families. The groups were a form of
"peasants' labor association," the members of which continued
to be owners of the land and of the fruits of their labor. According to
a Soviet analyst, the solidarity groups "organically united"
three forms of property--the land, which remained state property; the
collectively owned farm implements and the harvest; and the individual
peasant's holding, each the private property of a peasant family.
In theory, each solidarity group received between ten and fifteen
hectares of common land, depending upon the region and land
availability. This land had to be cultivated collectively, and the
harvest had to be divided among member families according to the amount
of work each family had contributed as determined by a work point
system. In dividing the harvest, allowance was made first for those who
were unable to contribute their labor, such as the elderly and the sick,
as well as nurses, teachers, and administrators. Some of the harvest was
set aside as seed for the following season, and the rest was distributed
to the workers. Those who performed heavy tasks and who consequently
earned more work points received a greater share of the harvest than
those who worked on light tasks. Women without husbands, however,
received enough to live on even if they did little work and earned few
work points. Work points also were awarded, beyond personal labor, to
individuals or to families who tended group-owned livestock or who lent
their own animals or tools for solidarity group use.
Each member family of a solidarity group was entitled to a private
plot of between 1,500 and 2,000 square meters (depending upon the
availability of land) in addition to land it held in common with other
members. Individual shares of the group harvest and of the produce from
private plots were the exclusive property of the producers, who were
free to consume store, barter, or sell them.
The solidarity groups evolved into three categories, each distinct in
its level of collectivization and in its provisions for land tenure. The
first category represented the highest level of collective labor. Member
families of each solidarity group in this category undertook all tasks
from plowing to harvesting. Privately owned farm implements and draft
animals continued to be individual personal property, and the owners
received remuneration for making them available to the solidarity group
during the planting and the harvesting seasons. Each group also had
collectively owned farm implements, acquired through state subsidy.
The second category was described as "a transitional form from
individual to collective form" at the KPRP National Conference in
November 1984. This category of group was different from the first
because it distributed land to member families at the beginning of the
season according to family size. In this second category, group members
worked collectively only on heavy tasks, such as plowing paddy fields
and transplanting rice seedlings. Otherwise, each family was responsible
for the cultivation of its own land allotment and continued to be owner
of its farm implements and animals, which could be traded by private
agreement among members. Some groups owned a common pool of rice seeds,
contributed by member families, and of farm implements, contributed by
the state. The size of the pool indicated the level of the group's
collectivization. The larger the pool, the greater the collective work.
In groups that did not have a common pool of rice and tools, productive
labor was directed primarily to meeting the family's needs, and the
relationship between the agricultural producers and the market or state
organizations was very weak.
The third category was classified as the family economy. As in the
second category, the group allocated land to families at the beginning
of the season, and farm implements continued to be their private
property. In this third category, however, the family cultivated its own
assigned lot, owned the entire harvest, and sold its surplus directly to
state purchasing organizations. In the solidarity groups of this
category, there was no collective effort, except in administrative and
sociocultural matters.
The government credited the solidarity group system with
rehabilitating the agricultural sector and increasing food production.
The system's contribution to socialism, however, was less visible and
significant. According to Chhea Song, deputy minister of agriculture, a
mere 10 percent of the solidarity groups really worked collectively in
the mid-1980s (seven years after solidarity groups had come into
operation). Seventy percent of the solidarity groups performed only some
tasks in common, such as preparing the fields and planting seeds.
Finally, 20 percent of the agricultural workers farmed their land as
individuals and participated in the category of the family economy.
Rice Production and Cultivation
In 1987 statistics on rice production were sparse, and they varied
depending upon sources. Cambodian government figures were generally
lower than those provided by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO) for the period from 1979 to 1985.
Political and technical factors account for the discrepancies. Data
collection in the war-torn nation is difficult because of the lack of
trained personnel. Moreover, representatives of international and of
foreign relief organizations are not permitted to travel beyond Phnom
Penh, except with special permission, because of security and logistics
problems. In addition, international and Cambodian sources use different
benchmarks in calculating rice production. FAO computes the harvest by
calendar year; Cambodian officials and private observers base their
calculations on the harvest season, which runs from November to February
and thus extends over two calendar years. Last of all, a substantial
statistical difference exists between milled rice and paddy (unmilled
rice) production, compounding problems in compiling accurate estimates.
In terms of weight, milled rice averages only 62 percent of the original
unmilled paddy. Estimates sometimes refer to these two kinds of rice
interchangeably.
Despite statistical discrepancies, there is consensus that annual
unmilled rice production during the 1979 to 1987 period did not reach
the 1966 level of 2.5 million tons. Nevertheless, since 1979, Cambodian
rice production has increased gradually (except during the disastrous
1984 to 1985 season), and the nation in the late 1980s had just begun to
achieve a precarious self-sufficiency, if estimates were borne out.
Cambodia's cultivated rice land can be divided into three areas. The
first and richest (producing more than one ton of rice per hectare)
covers the area of the Tonle Sap Basin and the provinces of Batdambang,
Kampong Thum, Kampong Cham, Kandal, Prey Veng, and Svay Rieng. The
second area, which yields an average of four-fifths of a ton of rice per
hectare, consists of Kampot and Kaoh Kong provinces along the Gulf of
Thailand, and some less fertile areas of the central provinces. The
third area, with rice yields of less than three-fifths of a ton per
hectare, is comprised of the highlands and the mountainous provinces of
Preah Vihear, Stoeng Treng, Rotanokiri (Ratanakiri), and Mondol kiri
(MondolKiri).
Cambodia has two rice crops each year, a monsoon-season crop
(long-cycle) and a dry-season crop. The major monsoon crop is planted in
late May through July, when the first rains of the monsoon season begin
to inundate and soften the land. Rice shoots are transplanted from late
June through September. The main harvest is usually gathered six months
later, in December. The dry-season crop is smaller, and it takes less
time to grow (three months from planting to harvest). It is planted in
November in areas that have trapped or retained part of the monsoon
rains, and it is harvested in January or February. The dry-season crop
seldom exceeds 15 percent of the total annual production.
In addition to these two regular crops, peasants plant floating rice
in April and in May in the areas around the Tonle Sap (Great Lake),
which floods and expands its banks in September or early October. Before
the flooding occurs, the seed is spread on the ground without any
preparation of the soil, and the floating rice is harvested nine months
later, when the stems have grown to three or four meters in response to
the peak of the flood (the floating rice has the property of adjusting
its rate of growth to the rise of the flood waters so that its grain
heads remain above water). It has a low yield, probably less than half
that of most other rice types, but it can be grown inexpensively on land
for which there is no other use.
The per-hectare rice yield in Cambodia is among the lowest in Asia.
The average yield for the wet crop is about 0.95 ton of unmilled rice
per hectare. The dry-season crop yield is traditionally higher--1.8 tons
of unmilled rice per hectare. New rice varieties (IR36 and IR42) have
much higher yields--between five and six tons of unmilled rice per
hectare under good conditions. Unlike local strains, however, these
varieties require a fair amount of urea and phosphate fertilizer (25,000
tons for 5,000 tons of seed), which the government could not afford to
import in the late 1980s.
Other Food and Commercial Crops
The main secondary crops in the late 1980s were maize, cassava, sweet
potatoes, groundnuts, soybeans, sesame seeds, dry beans, and rubber.
According to Phnom Penh, the country produced 92,000 tons of corn
(maize), as well as 100,000 tons of cassava, about 34,000 tons of sweet
potatoes, and 37,000 tons of dry beans in 1986. In 1987 local officials
urged residents of the different agricultural regions of the country to
step up the cultivation of subsidiary food crops, particularly of
starchy crops, to make up for the rice deficit caused by a severe
drought.
The principal commercial crop is rubber. In the 1980s, it was an
important primary commodity, second only to rice, and one of the
country's few sources of foreign exchange. Rubber plantations were
damaged extensively during the war (as much as 20,000 hectares was
destroyed), and recovery was very slow. In 1986 rubber production
totaled about 24,500 tons (from an area of 36,000 hectares, mostly in
Kampong Cham Province), far below the 1969 prewar output of 50,000 tons
(produced from an area of 50,000 hectares).
The government began exporting rubber and rubber products in 1985. A
major customer was the Soviet Union, which imported slightly more than
10,000 tons of Cambodian natural rubber annually in 1985 and in 1986. In
the late 1980s, Vietnam helped Cambodia restore rubber-processing
plants. The First Plan made rubber the second economic priority, with
production targeted at 50,000 tons-- from an expanded cultivated area of
50,000 hectares--by 1990.
Other commercial crops included sugarcane, cotton, and tobacco. Among
these secondary crops, the First Plan emphasized the production of jute,
which was to reach the target of 15,000 tons in 1990.
Cambodia - Livestock
Cambodia's major trading partners in the 1980s were Vietnam, the
Soviet Union, and the countries of Eastern Europe, particularly the
German Democratic Republic (East Germany), Czechoslovakia, Poland,
Hungary, and Bulgaria. Cambodia also claimed to have trade relations
with Japan, one of several countries that had recognized Sihanouk's
Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea (CGDK) and had imposed a
trade embargo on the Phnom Penh government of the People's Republic of
Kampuchea (PRK).
Vietnam
In February 1979, Cambodia signed a Treaty of Peace, Friendship and
Cooperation with Vietnam that formally strengthened "solidarity and
cooperation" between the two countries. As part of the Vietnamese
aid program to Cambodia, a joint scheme of pairing Cambodian provinces
with Vietnamese "sister provinces" was inaugurated in the same
year for the purposes of economic cooperation and of technical,
educational and cultural exchange. Cambodia's Rotanokiri Province,
however, was linked with two neighboring Vietnamese provinces--Nghia
Binh and Gia Lai-Cong Tum. In addition, the municipality of Phnom Penh
was paired with two Vietnamese cities--Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi.
Except for the municipalities of Hanoi and Haiphong, all of the
Vietnamese participants in the scheme were located in former South
Vietnam near their Cambodian counterparts.
The paired provinces were engaged mostly in barter trade the volume
and value of which were unpublicized. Some observers argued that the
system facilitated the integration of Cambodia's economy into Vietnam's.
They pointed to the case of Batdambang Province, which sent tons of rice
to its overpopulated and underfed Vietnamese sister province, Quang
Nam-Da Nang, in exchange for bicycles and cement. In another case,
Cambodia's Siemreab-Otdar Meanchey Province, supplied Vietnamese
counterparts in Binh Tri Thien Province with unmilled rice and other
agricultural products; in return, Vietnam supplied workers from Hue and
its suburbs to help run the building industry in Siemreab-Otdar Meanchey
This exchange came at the expense of Cambodian workers, who were
assigned to find clay, while the new Vietnamese settlers produced bricks
and tiles and made a good living. In Siemreab city, the Vietnamese also
assumed control of the biggest fish-sauce factory.
According to a Cambodian official's evaluation of foreign
cooperation, the pairing system worked successfully. The exchange of
goods between the sister provinces and cities helped "meet the
needs of the people promptly." Reportedly, the system also helped
Cambodia fulfill all of its development targets for 1986. In February
1986, Cambodia and Vietnam signed an agreement to double their trade for
that year.
Soviet
Union
The first important trade agreement between Cambodia and the Soviet
Union was signed in February 1983 and covered three years, 1983 through
1985. According to a Soviet source, Moscow's trade turnover with
Cambodia during this period increased from 71.8 to 100.3 million rubles. Cambodian exports were mainly rubber, while imports from
the Soviet Union consisted of refined petroleum products, textiles, and
chemical fertilizers.
In July 1984, Cambodia--following the examples of Vietnam, Laos, and
the East European countries--set up an Intergovernmental Commission for
Trade, Economic, Scientific, and Technical Cooperation to manage its
bilateral trade with the Soviet Union. The first session of the
commission was held in January 1985. At its fourth meeting, in December
1987, protocols were signed regarding the restoration of rubber
plantations and the development of some joint state enterprises.
On March 28, 1986, the two countries signed a five-year trade and aid
agreement for the period 1986 to 1990 that would double the level of
trade over that of the previous five-year period. The Soviet export
package included tractors, fertilizer, petroleum products, machines, and
raw materials. In exchange, Cambodia was to export raw rubber, timber,
and plant-based industrial products such as lacquer. According to the
Phnom Penh Domestic News Service, by the end of 1986 Cambodia had
shipped 91 percent of its planned exports to the Soviet Union and had
received 104 percent of its planned imports in return. During Cambodian
Prime Minister Hun Sen's visit to Moscow in July 1987, the Soviet press
reported that the volume of goods sold by the Soviet Union to Cambodia
in the 1986 to 1990 period would increase one-and-one-half times over
the previous five-year period, whereas goods sold by Cambodia would
increase more than four times. In November 1987, the two countries
concluded trade-payments agreement for 1988. Under the terms of this
agreement, the Soviet Union was to ship vehicles, tractor equipment, and
fertilizer and would receive in exchange "traditional export
goods" from Cambodia. Trade turnover between the two countries was
projected to reach nearly 80 million rubles in 1988.
East Germany
In 1986 the total trade between Cambodia and East Germany reached
about 14 million rubles, a 17 percent increase over the 1985 total of 12
million rubles. Cambodia exported more than 12 million rubles worth of
rubber to East Germany and an additional million rubles worth of other
goods. Cambodia's imports from East Germany amounted in value to more
than 965,000 rubles.
Czechoslovakia
Trade between Cambodia and Czechoslovakia totaled to 4.4 million
rubles in 1985. In 1986 Cambodia exported 800 tons of rubber, more than
400 cubic meters of timber, and 700 tons of soybeans to Czechoslovakia.
Cambodian imports from Czechoslovakia consisted chiefly of medicine and
cloth. The two countries signed a protocol in Prague on October 29,
1987, on the exchange of goods planned for 1988. Under the terms of the
protocol, total trade would increase by 19 percent over the 1987 level.
Cambodia was to export rubber, beans, and timber to Czechoslovakia and
was to import tractors, diesel engines, and pharmaceuticals.
Poland
Cambodia's trade with Poland between 1982 and 1985 was estimated at
4.4 million rubles. Cambodia exported rubber, timber, and soybeans and
imported Polish textiles, ship engines, and glassware. The two countries
set a trade target for 1986 to 1990 amounting to 14.3 million rubles.
In 1986 the trade between Cambodia and Poland amounted to 2.1 million
rubles. On February 18, 1987, the two countries negotiated a trade
agreement for the year stipulating that Cambodia would export crepe
rubber, timber, furniture, soybeans, sesame seeds, and farm products; it
would import, in return, antitrust paint, soldering rods, sewing
machines, boat engines, raw materials for medicine, and consumer goods.
Cambodia - Government and Politics
THE 1970S WERE cruel years for the Khmer people, and their impact was
still being felt in the late 1980s. The decade opened turbulently, with
the deposition of ruler Prince Norodom Sihanouk, who had been in power
from 1941, during the period when the war in Vietnam boiled over into
Cambodia. The country, militarily feeble and putatively neutral, soon
plunged into a succession of upheavals, punctuated by foreign
incursions, civil war, and famine. The Khmer Rouge, under Pol Pot (also known as Saloth Sar) and aided initially by
the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam), overran in 1975 the
pro-Western Khmer Republic led by the president, General Lon Nol. At least 1 million
Cambodians either were murdered or starved to death under the Pol Pot
regime. In 1979, however, Vietnam ousted the Khmer Rouge regime and
installed a puppet regime headed by Heng Samrin, a former Khmer Rouge
military commander.
The Vietnamese set out to tighten their grip on the country by
occupying and colonizing it. Meanwhile, the deposed Khmer Rouge regime
regrouped in remote enclaves near the Thai border to give armed
resistance to Vietnamese forces and the puppet government in Phnom Penh,
the nation's capital.
At the end of the 1970s, Cambodia was divided politically and
territorially under two regimes, each claiming to be the sole legitimate
government of the nation. Since then, the competing regimes have been
locked in an armed struggle in Cambodia, as one side contested the
Vietnamese presence and the other acquiesced more or less grudgingly to
its role as Hanoi's surrogate.
Vietnam promised repeatedly to leave Cambodia by 1990, and by the end
of 1987, Hanoi had staged six partial troop withdrawals. Officials in
Hanoi indicated, however, that phased withdrawals would end and that
Vietnamese forces would return to Cambodia if there were a threat to
Vietnam's national security. Members of the Association of Southeast
Asian Nations (ASEAN) and most Western nations were skeptical of the
moves and viewed them as merely disguised troop rotations. Among
Cambodia's noncommunist neighbors, Thailand especially was concerned
about the threat posed to its own security by a large, well-armed
Vietnamese army just to the east of its borders. On the diplomatic
front, the United Nations (UN) routinely condemned the Vietnamese
military presence in Cambodia on an annual basis, and most countries
withheld diplomatic recognition from the pro-Vietnamese Heng Samrin
regime in Phnom Penh.
In 1987 uncertain prospects for peace continued to vex Cambodian
nationalists. Differences--among warring Cambodian factions and their
respective foreign sponsors over the projected terms of a possible
settlement--were likely to remain unresolved in the foreseeable future.
Meanwhile, the Cambodian people continued to suffer from the war between
anti-Vietnamese guerrillas on the one side and the Vietnamese and the
Heng Samrin forces on the other side. The Cambodian search for
reconciliation among contending parties can be understood only when the
perspectives of foreign powers are taken into account.
In the late 1980s, the ruling political organization in Phnom Penh
was the Marxist-Leninist Kampuchean (or Khmer) People's Revolutionary
Party (KPRP), a political offshoot of the Indochinese Communist Party
(ICP), founded by Ho Chi Minh in 1930. Heng Samrin headed both the
state bureaucracy and the party apparatus in late 1987. Hun Sen, prime
minister since January 1985, chaired the single-party, KPRP-run
government, that was administered by the Council of Ministers. In
seeking to enlist mass support for its regime, the KPRP depended on an
umbrella popular front organization, affiliated with numerous social and
political groups, that was called the Kampuchean (or Khmer) United Front
for National Construction and Defense (KUFNCD--see Appendix B). The
KPRP, in exercising power in Phnom Penh under Vietnamese mentorship,
pursued three main objectives: to combat the enemy (anti-Vietnamese
resistance groups); to intensify production for the fulfillment of
targets set in the First Five-Year Program of Socioeconomic Restoration
and Development (1986-90), hereafter known as the First Plan; and to
build up the party's revolutionary forces by strengthening the regime's
political and administrative infrastructure and its national security
establishment. The party's foreign policy goals were to reinforce
solidarity with Vietnam and to develop cooperation with the Soviet
Union, the principal source of economic assistance to the government in
Phnom Penh.
The other regime competing for legitimacy in the 1980s was an
unlikely partnership of feuding communist and noncommunist factions, the
Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea (CGDK). The coalition
government, with Sihanouk serving on and off as president, was formed in
1982 under the sponsorship of China and the ASEAN states. The coalition
comprised the Khmer Rouge and two noncommunist groups led by Sihanouk
and Son Sann. Son Sann, a former prime minister under Sihanouk, was
known for his dislike of Sihanouk and of the Khmer Rouge.
Despite its claim that it was based inside Cambodia, the CGDK was a
government in exile. It operated out of Beijing, Pyongyang, or Bangkok,
or wherever its three leaders--Sihanouk, Khieu Samphan, and Son
Sann--happened to be, whether or not they were together. In the 1984 to
1985 Vietnamese dry-season offensive, the coalition lost nearly all of
its fixed guerrilla bases along the Thai border. Nonetheless, its
fighters continued to operate in small bands in many Cambodian
provinces. The CGDK's forces sought to drive the Vietnamese out of the
country, to win over the Cambodians who were resentful of the
Vietnamese, to destabilize the Heng Samrin regime, and to seek
international aid for continued resistance. The coalition government had
a distinct asset that its rival lacked--it was recognized by the United
Nations as the lawful representative of the state of Cambodia.
<>MAJOR POLITICAL
DEVELOPMENTS, 1977-81
Background
The communist conquest of Phnom Penh and of Saigon (renamed Ho Chi
Minh City) in April 1975 seemed to presage realization of Ho Chi Minh's
long-cherished political dream--stated in a 1935 resolution of the
ICP--an Indochinese federation comprising Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.
Many observers believed--because of Vietnam's efforts to nurture a
Cambodian communist party that was tied closely to Hanoi--that the
Indochinese federation that emerged would be controlled by Hanoi. The
Khmer Rouge victory of 1975, however, won by Pol Pot's chauvinistic and
hardline party faction with its abiding distrust of Vietnam, doomed this
prospect for the time being.
In mid-1975, a series of border clashes erupted between Cambodian and
Vietnamese forces. Each side blamed the other for initiating the
conflicts, which occurred even as Hanoi defended the Pol Pot regime
against international criticism of atrocities inside Cambodia. Border
fighting increased in 1977, according to some reports. In June of that
year, Vietnam proposed negotiations to settle the border dispute, but
the Khmer Rouge said negotiations would be premature. In December,
Cambodia accused Vietnam of aggression, demanded withdrawal of its
troops from the country, and severed diplomatic ties. In February 1978,
Hanoi called for an immediate end to all hostile military activities in
the border region and for the conclusion of a peace treaty. At the same
time, Hanoi denied the allegations that it had been trying to
incorporate Cambodia into an Indochinese federation, adding that Vietnam
had not entertained the idea of federation since the ICP was dissolved
in 1951. The Pol Pot regime continued to claim, however, that Vietnam
had never abandoned the idea of a federation, and the regime called on
Hanoi to cease activities aimed at overthrowing the Government of
Democratic Kampuchea.
Cambodia in Turmoil
On December 25, 1978, Vietnam launched a full-scale invasion of
Cambodia. Phnom Penh fell, after minimal resistance, on January 7, 1979,
and on the following day an anti-Khmer Rouge faction announced the
formation of the Kampuchean People's Revolutionary Council (KPRC), with
Heng Samrin as president of the new ruling body. On January 10, the KPRC
proclaimed that the new official name of Cambodia was the People's
Republic of Kampuchea (PRK--see Apendix B). Within a week, the PRK
notified the United Nations Security Council that it was the sole
legitimate government of the Cambodian people. Vietnam was the first
country to recognize the new regime, and Phnom Penh lost no time in
restoring diplomatic relations with Hanoi. From February 16 to February
19, the PRK and Vietnam held their first summit meeting in Phnom Penh
and cemented their relationship by signing a twenty- five-year Treaty of
Peace, Friendship and Cooperation. The treaty declared that the
"peace and security of the two countries are closely interrelated
and that the two Parties are duty-bound to help each other...."
Article 2 of the treaty dealt specifically with mutual security
assistance to help each defend against "all schemes and acts of
sabotage by the imperialist and international reactionary forces."
The two governments also signed agreements for cooperation on economic,
cultural, educational, public health, and scientific and technological
issues.
In rapid succession, the Soviet Union, other Marxist-Leninist states,
and a number of pro-Moscow developing countries had also recognized the
new regime. By January 1980, twenty-nine countries had recognized the
PRK, yet nearly eighty countries continued to recognize the Khmer Rouge.
More countries voiced opposition to Vietnam's involvement in
Cambodia. Most vocal was Thailand, the security of which was threatened
directly by the turn of events in Cambodia. (Thailand shares an
800-kilometer border with Cambodia, and historically it has regarded the
country as a buffer against Vietnamese expansion) The Thai government
demanded Vietnam's immediate withdrawal from Cambodia so that the
Cambodians would be able to choose their own government without foreign
interference. Thailand's allies in ASEAN-- Indonesia, Malaysia, the
Philippines, and Singapore--agreed with Bangkok's position.
The United States also agreed with Thailand's position. Although it
had never recognized Democratic Kampuchea and disapproved of the human
rights violations perpetrated by the Khmer Rouge, the United States
nonetheless supported Democratic Kampuchea's request for an emergency
session of the UN Security Council. China expressed its support for the
Khmer Rouge and even accused Vietnam of attempting to force Cambodia
into an Indochinese federation and of serving as an "Asian
Cuba"--a surrogate for the Soviet policy of global hegemony.
Soviet leaders hailed the PRK's "remarkable victory" and
expressed their full support for a peaceful, independent, democratic,
and nonaligned Cambodia that would advance toward socialism. Moscow also
accused Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge regime of genocide and implied that China
had imposed the regime on Cambodia.
Despite objections from the Soviet Union and from Czechoslovakia, the
UN Security Council allowed Prince Sihanouk to argue the case for
Democratic Kampuchea in early January 1979. Sihanouk--who had distanced
himself from Khmer Rouge brutality, charged that Vietnam had committed
flagrant acts of aggression against Cambodia, and he asked the council
to demand an end to Hanoi's interference in Cambodian affairs. He also
urged that the council not recognize the puppet regime in Phnom Penh,
and he appealed to all nations to suspend aid to Vietnam.
In the UN Security Council debate, Vietnam unsuccessfully challenged
Sihanouk's claim to represent Cambodia, asserting that he spoke for a
regime that no longer existed. Vietnam also charged that the Pol Pot
regime had provoked the border war and that Hanoi's presence in Cambodia
was necessary and was strictly an issue between Vietnam and the PRK.
Hanoi argued, moreover, that the Cambodian crisis was a matter of
internal strife among rival groups that was brought on by Pol Pot's
atrocities against his own countrymen. Hanoi actually asserted that
there was no "Cambodian problem" that warranted a debate in
the UN or anywhere else in the international political arena.
The fifteen-member UN Security Council, however, failed to adopt a
resolution on Cambodia. Seven nonaligned members on the council had
submitted a draft resolution, which was endorsed by Britain, China,
France, Norway, Portugal, and the United States. But the draft, which
called for a cease-fire in Cambodia and for the withdrawal of all
foreign forces from that country, was not approved because of objections
from the Soviet Union and from Czechoslovakia.
The fate of Cambodia was interwoven with the security interests of
its Asian neighbors. For example, on February 17, 1979, China attacked
Vietnam, apparently to ease Vietnamese pressure against Thailand and
against Chinese-supported Khmer Rouge guerrillas. The Cambodian question
surfaced again in the UN Security Council session that was convened on
February 23 to consider ending the hostilities along the
Vietnamese-Chinese border and in Cambodia. This time the focus was on
regional power politics; China demanded that the UN Security Council
censure Vietnam for its invasion of Cambodia, and the Soviet Union asked
that the council condemn China for its "aggression" against
Vietnam. The United States called for the withdrawal of Chinese forces
from Vietnam and of Vietnamese forces from Cambodia.
In late 1979, the stage was set for an international political
showdown over Cambodia. In September of that year, the UN General
Assembly rejected the efforts of the Soviet Union, the Congo, and Panama
to challenge the legality of Democratic Kampuchea and decided that it
should continue to be represented at the United Nations. The vote was
seventy-one to thirty-five in support of the decision, with thirty-four
abstentions. (Sihanouk, who no longer represented the Khmer Rouge
regime, argued that the Cambodian seat should be left vacant because
neither of the two Cambodian claimants had the mandate of the Cambodian
people.) In November, the UN General Assembly adopted an ASEAN-sponsored
resolution by a vote of eighty-one to twenty-one, with twenty-nine
abstentions, calling for immediate Vietnamese disengagement from
Cambodia. The resolution also called on all states to refrain from
interference in, and acts of aggression against, Cambodia and its
Southeast Asian neighbors. The assembly mandated the UN secretary
general to explore the possibility of an international conference on
Cambodia and appealed for international humanitarian aid for the
country's population and for its refugees who had fled to neighboring
countries.
Cambodia's PRK regime, under the leadership of Heng Samrin, set out
to restore the country's social and economic life, which had been racked
by a decade of political turmoil. During 1979 the country was still
reeling from the horrors of the Khmer Rouge, and the lack of educated
and qualified personnel to staff administrative posts was hampering
efforts to reestablish a civil government. Most of the country's
educated elite had been murdered during the Pol Pot era, while others
had fled to safety in Vietnam. (In August 1979, a Phnom Penh
"people's revolutionary tribunal" tried Pol Pot and his
closest confidant, Foreign Minister Ieng Sary, in absentia, on charges
of genocidal crimes and then sentenced them to death.) Another
complication for the Heng Samrin regime was the growing Khmer Rouge
guerrilla resistance in the western and the northwestern border areas.
By mid-1980, life in villages and in towns had stabilized somewhat,
and relief aid from the Soviet Union, Vietnam, and some Western
countries had helped to prevent mass starvation. Meanwhile, the regime
had managed gradually to extend its administrative control to outlying
areas close to the Thai border and had initiated the drafting of a
constitution in January 1980. The National Assembly, which had been
elected in May 1981, formally adopted and promulgated the Constitution
in June.
But opposition to the Heng Samrin regime had been growing since 1979.
The most prominent opposition group was the Khmer Rouge, which sought to
reestablish its political legitimacy and to mobilize the Cambodian
people against the Vietnamese. In January 1979, Khmer Rouge leaders
announced the formation of the Patriotic and Democratic Front of the
Great National Union of Kampuchea (PDFGNUK), a popular front
organization in which the Kampuchean (or Khmer) Communist Party (KCP),
under Pol Pot planned to play a dominant role.
As part of an image-rebuilding effort, the Khmer Rouge announced the
replacement, in December 1979, of Prime Minister Pol Pot with the
politically moderate Khieu Samphan. The replacement did not affect Pol
Pot's position as leader of the KCP or his control of the Khmer Rouge
armed forces, officially called the National Army of Democratic
Kampuchea (NADK). Khieu Samphan retained his position as president of
the State Presidium of Democratic Kampuchea, a post equivalent to head
of state under the 1975 constitution of Democratic Kampuchea. At about
the same time, it also was disclosed that the political program of the
PDFGNUK, adopted in December, would serve as the provisional fundamental
law of Democratic Kampuchea until free elections could be held. Sihanouk
described the episode as a ploy designed to give the Khmer Rouge's
"odious face" a mask of respectability.
The first and principal noncommunist resistance group was the Khmer
People's National Liberation Front (KPNLF) led by Son Sann. The front's
military arm was the Khmer People's National Liberation Armed Forces
(KPNLAF). It was originally formed, in March 1979, by General Dien Del,
a former army officer under Lon Non's Khmer Republic. Son Sann's
formation of the KPNLF on October 9, 1979, coincided with the ninth
anniversary of the founding of the Khmer Republic and therefore
symbolized rejection of "Sihanoukism." After 1979 Son Sann and
Sihanouk often clashed over the issue of coalition-building and national
reconciliation, despite their common distaste for the Khmer Rouge and
for the Vietnamese occupation. After 1985 the KPNLF fell into disarray
as a result of leadership disputes in the movement's top echelon. By
late 1987, it still had not regained its former stature or fighting
strength.
The second noncommunist, nationalist resistance faction was the
Sihanouk group called initially the Movement for the National Liberation
of Kampuchea (Mouvement pour la Lib�ration Nationale du Kampuch�a -
MOULINAKA), formed in August 1979 by Kong Sileah after his split with
General Dien Del. In September, Sihanouk set up the Confederation of
Khmer Nationalists from his base in Pyongyang, Democratic People's
Republic of Korea (North Korea). The confederation lacked support
because key actors in the Cambodian situation perceived it to be merely
a forum, and that only for "committed Sihanoukists." Around
March 1981, the MOULINAKA group joined with other small pro-Sihanouk
factions to establish a political organization called the National
United Front for an Independent, Neutral, Peaceful, and Cooperative
Cambodia (Front Uni National pour un Cambodge Ind�pendant, Neutre,
Pacifique, et Coop�ratif (FUNCINPEC). The movement soon formed its own
armed wing, the Sihanouk National Army (Arm�e Nationale Sihanoukiste -
ANS), which began minor incursions into Cambodia. As a political
movement, FUNCINPEC quickly acquired a legitimacy beyond its numbers,
because of the impeccable nationalist credentials of its head, Sihanouk.
Moreover, although it remained the smallest of the Khmer resistance
groups until 1985, its quest for stature was abetted by its having
neither the opprobrious human rights record of the Khmer Rouge to live
down, nor the debilitating leadership disputes of the KPNLF with which
to contend.
Cambodia - COALITION GOVERNMENT OF DEMOCRATIC KAMPUCHEA
The establishment of the tripartite Coalition Government of
Democratic Kampuchea (CGDK) in June 1982 was a significant achievement
for the resistance groups, which had quarreled bitterly throughout the
negotiations that led to unity. Following its founding, the CGDK became
the center of the antiVietnamese cause, served as the country's lawful
spokesman in international forums, and demonstrated a credible capacity
for bringing the Cambodian conflict to a political and military
stalemate. In the late 1980s, this stalemate renewed multilateral
interest in a settlement of the Cambodian question.
Origins of the Coalition
In the aftermath of the 1978 Vietnamese invasion, many Cambodians
clamored for national unity, but only a few responded to the Khmer
Rouge's appeal for unity under the PDFGNUK. Their reluctance to
rally behind the Khmer Rouge was understandable because they envisioned
a new Cambodia that was neither ruled by the Khmer Rouge nor controlled
by the Vietnamese. Many Cambodians believed that an essential condition
of any movement aimed at restoring national freedom should be opposition
to the Khmer Rouge and the Vietnamese. Sihanouk and Son Sann were both
uneasy about reconciliation with the Khmer Rouge. Still, Cambodian
solidarity against Hanoi would be fragile at best without the
participation of the Khmer Rouge, the strongest of all the resistance
groups.
Then in January 1979, Sihanouk, charged by the Democratic Kampuchea
leadership with presenting Cambodia's case before the United Nations,
broke with his sponsors and demanded that the Khmer Rouge be expelled
from the United Nations for their mass murders. And in early 1980, he
deplored ASEAN's continued recognition of Democratic Kampuchea,
criticized China's military aid to the Khmer Rouge, and accused Thai
authorities of closing their eyes to Chinese arm shipments through
Thailand to Khmer Rouge rebels. In June 1980, Sihanouk, frustrated,
announced his permanent retirement from all political activities.
Meanwhile, Son Sann, who had been indirectly in touch with Pol Pot
since November 1979, announced in January 1980 that he would form an
anti-Vietnamese united front with the Khmer Rouge if the group's leaders
agreed to step down and to relinquish their power to his new
organization. He also raised the possibility of forming his own
provisional government to rival the Khmer Rouge. Cooperation with
Sihanouk seemed unlikely.
Khieu Samphan, president of the State Presidium of the defunct regime
of Democratic Kampuchea, proposed that Son Sann join forces with the
Khmer Rouge on a common political platform. In 1979 and in 1980, the
Khmer Rouge reportedly came under pressure from China to forge a united
front under Sihanouk or Son Sann. The ASEAN countries also urged the
Khmer Rouge to put its blood-stained image behind it and to mend its
political fences with the noncommunist resistance groups. The United
Nations informed the Khmer Rouge that a new mode of behavior would be
necessary if its deposed regime were to retain its seat in the
organization.
The united front idea got off to a slow start in 1981. In February
Sihanouk, reversing his retirement from politics, indicated his
willingness to lead the front if China and the Khmer Rouge supported his
preconditions of Chinese military and financial assistance to all
Cambodian resistance factions, not just the Khmer Rouge, and of the
disarming of all resistance groups after the Vietnamese disengagement
from Cambodia. The disarming was essential, he asserted, to prevent the
Khmer Rouge from inaugurating a new round of terror and a new civil war.
As a safeguard, Sihanouk also wanted an international peace-keeping
force after the Vietnamese departure, an internationally guaranteed
neutralization of Cambodia, and a trusteeship under which the country
would be a ward of the United Nations for five to ten years.
Furthermore, he requested that the country's official name be Cambodia
instead of Democratic Kampuchea. The name change was a bid to undermine
the legal status of the Pol Pot regime as de jure representative of
Democratic Kampuchea because the latter designation had been that of the
Khmer Rouge exclusively.
Son Sann was indifferent to Sihanouk's willingness to lead the front.
Khieu Samphan, on the other hand, was conciliatory and stated that the
KCP would be disbanded if necessary. He acknowledged at the same time
that Democratic Kampuchea had blundered by trying to develop the country
"much too fast," adding that this haste had "affected the
health of people" and had cost the lives of nearly 1 million
Cambodians. He also blamed Vietnam's "special warfare of
genocide" for the deaths of "2.5 million" Cambodians. In
addition, he claimed that a new Cambodia would not be socialist, would
honor private property, and would cooperate on a "large-scale"
with the West. He even said that Democratic Kampuchea was ready to join
ASEAN as a member "at any time."
Sihanouk and Khieu Samphan held their first exploratory unity talks
in Pyongyang on March 10 and 11, 1981, without Son Sann, who claimed
that neither of the two spoke for the Cambodian people. The talks
foundered because Khieu Samphan objected to Sihanouk's demand that all
resistance factions be disarmed in the future.
Sihanouk sought to enlist the cooperation of Son Sann, especially in
securing arms from China and from the United States. Sihanouk realized,
however, that China would not back his 2,000- strong force unless he
collaborated with the Khmer Rouge on its terms. Then in April, Sihanouk
said he was willing to drop his demand for the disarmament of Khmer
Rouge forces in exchange for Chinese aid to the ANS.
Son Sann reacted cautiously to the Sihanouk-Khieu Samphan talks,
distrusting collaboration with the Khmer Rouge at least until after the
KPNLF's military strength matched that of the communist faction.
However, he left open the possibility of future cooperation, citing a
KPNLF-Khmer Rouge cease-fire accord in early 1980. Son Sann also
disclosed that he had ignored Sihanouk's four attempts at tactical
cooperation since 1979.
By August 1981, unity talks seemed to have collapsed because of
unacceptable preconditions advanced by the KPNLF and by the Khmer Rouge.
Son Sann was adamant that Khmer Rouge leaders "most
compromised" by their atrocities be exiled to China and that the
proposed united front be led by the KPNLF. Meanwhile, Khieu Samphan
urged his rivals not to undermine the autonomy of the Khmer Rouge or to
undo the legal status of Democratic Kampuchea.
The three leaders broke their deadlock, with encouragement from
ASEAN, and held their first summit in Singapore from September 2 to 4.
They reached a four-point accord that included the creation of "a
coalition government of Democratic Kampuchea"; the establishment of
an ad hoc committee to draw up a blueprint for the coalition government;
an expression of support for the resolution of the first International
Conference on Kampuchea (held in New York, July 13 to July 17, 1981) as
well as for other relevant UN General Assembly resolutions on Cambodia;
and an appeal for international support of their common cause. They also
decided not to air their internal differences publicly "during the
whole period of the agreement" and not to attack one another in the
battlefield. Most observers regarded the agreement as a breakthrough
that would enable the Khmer Rouge regime to hold onto its seat in the
United Nations and that would enhance the prospect of increased access
to foreign military assistance for the KPNLF and FUNCINPEC.
At a joint press conference on September 4, all sides sought to paper
over their differences. Son Sann muted his demand for the removal of the
Khmer Rouge leadership, and Khieu Samphan portrayed Democratic Kampuchea
in a new, moderate light, maintaining that it would respect individual
rights and private ownership of property. Sihanouk noted that the three
resistance groups would maintain their separate military units, but
under a joint general staff and a military council that soon would be
established.
But in a separate press interview the following day, Sihanouk
provided a glimpse of those differences that persisted among the
resistance leaders. He revealed his reluctance to join what he called
"war-mongering" leaders, possibly alluding to Khieu Samphan or
to Son Sann. Sihanouk held out little hope for a military solution to
the unrest in Cambodia and emphasized that China, the Soviet Union, and
the United States would have to lend assistance if the crisis were to be
solved peacefully. Sihanouk also struck a prophetic note, saying that
Cambodians must not only reach "an honorable compromise" with
the Vietnamese, but that should also work out a comprehensive
reconciliation among themselves and should include the
Vietnamese-installed puppet regime in Phnom Penh.
Between September 13 and November 14, 1981, the ad hoc committee
established under the accord met nine times in Bangkok and agreed on
principles of equal power sharing among the three factions, on decision
making by consensus, and on use of Democratic Kampuchea's legal
framework as the basis for the proposed coalition government. To no
one's surprise, these principles were subject to conflicting
self-serving interpretations. Sihanouk and Son Sann feared that the
Khmer Rouge group would somehow exploit the coalition scheme at their
expense. Their fear was well-founded in that Khieu Samphan wanted the
coalition government to be an integral part of Democratic Kampuchea. In
an apparent effort to offset the perceived Khmer Rouge advantage, Son
Sann resurrected his demand that Khmer Rouge leaders be excluded from
the coalition government and that the KPNLF be guaranteed control of a
majority of key ministerial posts. The Khmer Rouge called Son Sann's
demands "unreasonable." By mid-November, Son Sann had
announced his dissociation from the coalition scheme.
On November 22 and 23, Singapore intervened, with backing from
Thailand and the other ASEAN countries, and proposed the formation of
"a loose coalition government" in which Democratic Kampuchea
would become one of three equal partners of the alliance, not the
all-important constitutional anchor for the tripartite government.
Sihanouk praised the Singapore formula as "a much better deal"
for the noncommunist groups. The Khmer Rouge rejected the formula,
asserted that the loose coalition arrangement would not have any legal
status as "the Democratic Kampuchean Government," and, on
December 7, criticized Sihanouk and Son Sann for attempting to
"isolate and weaken" the Khmer Rouge, which was the only force
both fighting and stalemating the Vietnamese.
In February 1982, Sihanouk and Khieu Samphan met in Beijing without
Son Sann to clarify several ambiguities. One notable result of the
meeting was a shift in the Khmer Rouge insistence on constitutional
linkage between Democratic Kampuchea and the proposed coalition
government. In what was described as "another concession,"
Khieu Samphan elaborated the position that his side would not attempt to
integrate the other resistance groups into "the Democratic
Kampuchean institutions." He emphasized, however, that the others
must accept and defend the "legal status" of Democratic
Kampuchea as a UN member state. Sihanouk asked Son Sann to resolve his
differences with Khieu Samphan and to join the coalition. By May, Son
Sann had softened his anti-Khmer Rouge posture and had expressed
readiness to cooperate with the others under a Thai-proposed plan that
would have Sihanouk as head of state, Son Sann as prime minister, and
Khieu Samphan as deputy prime minister. In talks with Khieu Samphan in
mid-June, Son Sann agreed on the principle of tripartite rule.
Coalition Structure
The three leaders finally signed an agreement on the longsought
coalition on June 22, 1982, in Kuala Lumpur. Sihanouk pledged to be
"a loyal partner" and to respect the accord; Son Sann praised
the CGDK as "an authentic and legal government"; and Khieu
Samphan voiced hope that the CGDK would last a long time, even after the
eventual Vietnamese departure. The three signed the coalition agreement
without identifying their organizations because Son Sann had refused to
recognize Sihanouk's FUNCINPEC.
The June agreement failed to mitigate substantially suspicion of the
Khmer Rouge. Sihanouk and Son Sann, for instance, refused to allow CGDK
headquarters to be located on Khmer Rouge-controlled territory. Within
only a few days of the signing, Sihanouk proposed--at the urging of
Singapore and Malaysia--that the two noncommunist groups merge in an
effort to improve their standing vis-�-vis the Khmer Rouge. But Son
Sann, wanting to maintain a separate identity, rejected the idea. In
addition, Sihanouk had planned to announce, in Bangkok on July 12, that
the agreement had been signed, but the Voice of Democratic
Kampuchea--the Khmer Rouge's clandestine radio station, aired the text
of the accord on July 11 and upstaged Sihanouk. Animosity between
Sihanouk and Khieu Samphan grew because of the incident.
The purpose of the CGDK, as stated in the June accord, was "to
mobilize all efforts in the common struggle to liberate Kampuchea from
the Vietnamese aggressors" and "to bring about the
implementation of the declaration of the International Conference on
Kampuchea and other relevant UN General Assembly resolutions."
After the Vietnamese withdrawal, the Cambodians were to determine their
own future through a general, free, and secret election under UN
supervision.
The CGDK was to function within the "legitimacy and framework of
the State of Democratic Kampuchea," and its three partners were to
share power equally and to make decisions by consensus. Each partner
would have a certain degree of freedom and would maintain organizational
and political autonomy. The autonomy would be needed should the CGDK
prove unworkable, in which case the right to represent Cambodia would
revert to the Khmer Rouge "in order to ensure the continuity of the
state of Democratic Kampuchea" as a member of the United Nations.
The coalition's top governing body was the "inner cabinet,"
formally called the Council of Ministers. The threemember inner cabinet consisted of Sihanouk as
president of Democratic Kampuchea, Khieu Samphan as vice president in
charge of foreign affairs, and Son Sann as prime minister. The cabinet
was to meet regularly inside Cambodia--to demonstrate the viability of
the CGDK--for the purposes of discussing domestic and foreign policy
matters and of resolving differences within the coalition. Below the
inner cabinet were six coordinating committees, each with one
representative from each of the coalition's three factions. The six
committees, or ministries, were in charge of economy and finance;
national defense; culture and education; public health and social
affairs; military affairs, and press and information affairs.
In the late 1980s, the CGDK claimed to have held an inner cabinet
session inside Cambodia at least once a year since its formation.
According to unconfirmed reports, much of the time in these sessions was
devoted to charges made by Sihanouk that Khmer Rouge soldiers had
attacked his troops. The Khmer Rouge denied the charges, blaming
"Vietnamese agents" for such incidents if, indeed, they had
occurred at all.
In 1987 Sihanouk engaged in considerable maneuvering as he sought to
restore some momentum to the search for a negotiated solution to the
situation in Cambodia. Adopting the tactic of temporary abdication of
responsibility that he had employed before in his long political career,
he began a one-year leave of absence from his duties as president of the
CGDK in May 1987. Sihanouk cited several reasons for his decision. The
first was his displeasure with continued Khmer Rouge attacks on his
troops and the human rights violations by the Khmer Rouge and by the
KPNLF against displaced persons in refugee camps controlled by these
groups. The second reason was the alleged "duplicity" of
unnamed foreign governments, which, Sihanouk said, were exploiting
Cambodia as a pawn in their power struggle. He also claimed that an
unidentified foreign sponsor-- probably an allusion to China--was
deliberately holding back "the rebirth of Sihanoukism" for the
benefit of the Khmer Rouge. Finally, Sihanouk added that he was leaving
to explore the prospect of reconciliation with leaders of Hanoi and
Phnom Penh. Sihanouk's temporary dissociation from the CGDK, some
observers believed, would free him from the burden of consulting with
Son Sann and Khieu Samphan.
Cambodia - Democratic Kampuchea
From its inception in October 1979, the right-wing, proWestern ,
former prime minister Son Sann, noted for his integrity and for his
unyielding personality, led the Khmer People's National Liberation Front
(KPNLF). The organization was the strongest of the country's
noncommunist resistance forces. Its key figures were formerly prominent
in the administrations of Sihanouk and of republican leader Lon Nol. A
number of displaced Cambodians sheltered in temporary camps on Thai soil
near the Thai-Cambodian border backed the KPNLF, which had originated in
the anti-Khmer Rouge movement of the 1960s. It controlled about 160,000
civilians confined at "Site 2," a camp in Thailand barely a
kilometer from the Cambodian border. Most of the people in the camp were
toughened survivors of the Pol Pot era, and they were therefore a
potential pool from which to recruit armed rebels for the KPNLF.
In the 1984 to 1985 Vietnamese dry-season offensive, the KPNLF
reportedly lost nearly a third of its 12,000 to 15,000 troops in battle
and through desertions. This setback, which was blamed on Son Sann for
his alleged meddling in military matters, aggravated the long-standing
personality conflicts within the KPNLF. Some KPNLF members criticized
Son Sann's alleged tendency toward being dictatorial and unbending, and
they questioned his lukewarm attitude toward the idea of a unified
military command that included Sihanouk's ANS. Criticism mounted after
reports that some of the organization's field commanders were involved
in the black market and in other forms of corruption. Charges of human
rights violations in the KPNLF-run camps for displaced persons further
fueled internal dissension.
In December 1985, a dissident faction, wanting to limit Son Sann's
role to ceremonial duties, announced the formation of a Provisional
Central Committee of Salvation, which would be the new executive body of
the KPNLF. The new group asserted that it had seized power from Son Sann
in order to put an end to the internal problems of the KPNLF. Key
members of the group included two KPNLF vice presidents: General Sak
Sutsakhan, formerly Lon Nol's chief of staff; and General Dien Del,
commander in chief and chief of staff of the KPNLF armed forces. Other
notables were Abdul Gaffar Peangmeth and Hing Kunthon, two executive
committee members whom Son Sann had dismissed earlier, and Huy Kanthoul,
a former prime minister.
Son Sann countered with the formation of a new military command
committee under General Prum Vith. He said, however, that General Sak
would remain as commander in chief of the Joint Military Command (that
now included the ANS), which was launched in January 1986, reportedly as
a concession to the dissident group. Under a compromise worked out
through a third party, General Sak regained his control of the armed
forces in March 1986. Son Sann, then seventy-four years old, withdrew a
previous threat to resign as CGDK prime minister. By early 1987, unity
in the KPNLF had been restored, and Son Sann retained his presidency,
while General Sak remained in full control of the military.
In a major reshuffle of the military high command in March, General
Sak placed his deputy, Dien Del, in charge of anticorruption measures.
The need for sweeping internal reform already had become a pressing
issue in January 1987, when morale was so low that several hundred KPNLF
soldiers defected to Sihanouk's ANS.
National United Front for an Independent, Peaceful, Neutral, and
Cooperative Cambodia
Sihanouk's political organization, the National United Front for an
Independent, Peaceful, Neutral, and Cooperative Cambodia (Front Uni
National pour un Cambodge Ind�pendant Neutre, Pacifique, et Coop�ratif--FUNCINPEC),
emerged in 1987 as an increasingly popular resistance group, that drew
support from a broad range of Cambodians. FUNCINPEC's indispensable
asset was Sihanouk himself. He maintained residences in Pyongyang, in
Mougins (located in southern France), and in Beijing. His son, Prince
Norodom Ranariddh, was Sihanouk's sole authorized spokesman and was the
head of FUNCINPEC's office in Bangkok. Among his confidants were Nhek
Tioulong, a former cabinet minister under Sihanouk; Buor Hel, a cousin
of Sihanouk's; and Chak Saroeun, FUNCINPEC secretary general. As vice
president of the organization's Executive Committee and commander in
chief of the ANS, former prime minister In Tam was also a key FUNCINPEC
loyalist, but he resigned in March 1985 as the result of a feud with
Prince Ranariddh.
FUNCINPEC had its share of internal problems. After In Tam's
departure, Ranariddh, to the dismay of In Tam's supporters, became the
ANS's temporary commander in chief. In January 1986, Sihanouk reshuffled
the ANS high command, formally appointing his son commander in chief
and, in addition, ANS chief of staff. Sihanouk also dismissed General
Teap Ben, who had been chief of staff since 1981, for alleged
embezzlement of refugee funds and for disloyalty; Tean Ben was relegated
to the nominal post of deputy commander in chief of the Joint Military
Command. In May 1986, Sihanouk, citing Ranariddh's heavy workload, was
reported to be considering the appointment of General Toal Chay as the
new ANS chief of staff. At the end of 1987, however, Sihanouk's son
continued to hold the two key military posts.
Cambodia - THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KAMPUCHEA
An administrative infrastructure, functioning under the KPRC, was
more or less in place between 1979 and 1980. With the promulgation of
the Constitution in June 1981, new organs, such as the National
Assembly, the Council of State, and the Council of Ministers, assumed
KPRC functions. These new bodies evolved slowly. It was not until
February 1982 that the National Assembly enacted specific law for these
bodies.
The National Assembly
The "supreme organ of state power" is the National
Assembly, whose deputies are directly elected for five-year terms. The
assembly's 117 seats were filled on May 1, 1981, the date of the PRK's
first elections. (The KNUFNS had nominated 148 candidates.) The voter
turnout was reported as 99.17 percent of the electorate, which was
divided into 20 electoral districts.
During its first session, held from June 24 to June 27, the assembly
adopted the new Constitution and elected members of the state organs set
up under the Constitution. The assembly had been empowered to adopt or
to amend the Constitution and the laws and to oversee their
implementation; to determine domestic and foreign policies; to adopt
economic and cultural programs and the state budget; and to elect or to
remove its own officers and members of the Council of State and of the
Council of Ministers. The assembly also was authorized to levy, revise,
or abolish taxes; to decide on amnesties; and to ratify or to abrogate
international treaties. As in other socialist states, the assembly's
real function is to endorse the legislative and administrative measures
initiated by the Council of State and by the Council of Ministers, both
of which serve as agents of the ruling KPRP.
The National Assembly meets twice a year and may hold additional
sessions if needed. During the periods between its sessions, legislative
functions are handled by the Council of State. Bills are introduced by
the Council of State, the Council of Ministers, the assembly's several
commissions (legislative committees), chairman of the KUFNCD, and heads
of other organizations. Individual deputies are not entitled to
introduce bills.
Once bills, state plans and budgets, and other measures are
introduced, they are studied first by the assembly's commissions, which
deal with legislation, economic planning, budgetary matters, and
cultural and social affairs. Then they go to the assembly for adoption.
Ordinary bills are passed by a simple majority (by a show of hands).
Constitutional amendments require a two-thirds majority. The Council of
State must promulgate an adopted bill within thirty days of its passage.
Another function of the assembly is to oversee the affairs of the
Council of Ministers, which functions as the cabinet. Assembly members
may make inquiries of cabinet officials, but they are not entitled to
call for votes of confidence in the cabinet. Conversely, the Council of
Ministers is not empowered to dissolve the National Assembly.
The Constitution states that in case of war or under "other
exceptional circumstances," the five-year life of the Assembly may
be extended by decree. In 1986 the assembly's term was extended for
another five years, until 1991.
The Council of State
The National Assembly elects seven of its members to the Council of
State. After the assembly's five-year term, council members remain in
office until a new assembly elects a new council. The chairman of the
council serves as the head of state, but the power to serve as ex
officio supreme commander of the armed forces was deleted from the final
draft of the Constitution.
The council's seven members are among the most influential leaders of
the PRK. Between sessions of the National Assembly, the Council of State
carries out the assembly's duties. It may appoint or remove--on the
recommendation of the Council of Ministers-- cabinet ministers,
ambassadors, and envoys accredited to foreign governments. In addition,
the Council of State organizes elections to the National Assembly,
convenes regular and special sessions of the assembly, promulgates and
interprets the Constitution and the laws, reviews judicial decisions,
rules on pardons and on commutations of sentences, and ratifies or
abrogates treaties. Foreign diplomatic envoys present their letters of
accreditation to the Council of State.
The Council of Ministers
The government's top executive organ is the Council of Ministers, or
cabinet, which in late 1987 was headed by Hun Sen (as it had been since
January 1985). Apart from the prime minister (formally called chairman),
the Council of Ministers has two deputy prime ministers (vice chairmen)
and twenty ministers. The National Assembly elects the council's
ministers for five-year terms. They are responsible collectively to the
assembly. When the assembly is not in session, they are responsible to
the Council of State. The prime minister must be a member of the
assembly; other council members, however, need not be. The council's
five-year term continues without hiatus until a new cabinet is formed
after general elections.
The Council of Ministers meets weekly in an executive session, which
is attended by the prime minister, the deputy prime ministers, and a
chief of staff who is called the Minister in Charge of the Office of the
Council of Ministers. The executive group prepares an agenda for
deliberation and adoption by the council's monthly plenary session. (A
secretary general of the Council of Ministers provides administrative
support for the cabinet.) The executive group also addresses measures
for implementing the plenary session's decisions, and it reviews and
coordinates the work of government agencies at all levels. Decisions
made in the executive sessions are "collective," whereas those
in the plenary sessions are by a majority. Representatives of KUFNCD and
other mass organizations, to which all citizens may belong, may be
invited to attend plenary sessions of the council "when [it is]
discussing important issues." These representatives may express
their views but they are not allowed to vote.
Government ministries are in charge of agriculture; communications,
transport, and posts; education; finance; foreign affairs; health; home
and foreign trade; industry; information and culture; interior; justice;
national defense; planning; and social affairs and invalids. In
addition, the cabinet includes a minister for agricultural affairs and
rubber plantations, who is attached to the Office of the Council of
Ministers; a minister in charge of the Office of the Council of
Ministers; a secretary general of the Office of the Council of
Ministers, who is also in charge of transport and of Khmer-Thai border
defense networks; a director of the State Affairs Inspectorate; and the
president-director general of the People's National Bank of Kampuchea.
The Office of the Council of Ministers serves as the administrative
nerve center of the government. Directed by its cabinet-rank minister,
this office is supposed "to prepare, facilitate, coordinate, unify,
and guide all activities of individual ministries and localities."
Fiscal inspection of public institutions is the responsibility of the
State Affairs Inspectorate, which has branch offices in all provinces.
The Judiciary
The restoration of law and order has been one of the more pressing
tasks of the Heng Samrin regime. Since 1979 the administration of
justice has been in the hands of people's revolutionary courts that were
set up hastily in Phnom Penh and in other major provincial cities. A new
law dealing with the organization of courts and with the Office of
Public Prosecutor was promulgated in February 1982. Under this law, the
People's Supreme Court became the highest court of the land.
The judicial system comprises the people's revolutionary courts, the
military tribunals, and the public prosecutors' offices. The Council of
State may establish additional courts to deal with special cases. The
Council of Ministers, on the recommendations of local administrative
bodies called people's revolutionary committees, appoints judges and
public prosecutors. Two or three people's councillors (the equivalents
of jurors or of assessors) assist the judges, and they have the same
power as the judges in passing sentence.
Local People's Revolutionary Committees
In late 1987, the country was divided into eighteen provinces (khet)
and two special municipalities (krong), Phnom Penh and Kampong
Saom, which are under direct central government control. The provinces
were subdivided into about 122 districts (srok), 1,325 communes
(khum), and 9,386 villages (phum). The subdivisions of
the municipalities were wards (sangkat).
An elective body, consisting of a chairman (president), one or more
vice chairmen, and a number of committee members, runs each people's
revolutionary committee. These elective bodies are chosen by
representatives of the next lower level people's revolutionary
committees at the provincial and district levels. At the provincial and
district levels, where the term of office is five years, committee
members need the additional endorsement of officials representing the
KUFNCD and other affiliated mass organizations. At the commune and ward
level, the members of the people's revolutionary committees are elected
directly by local inhabitants for a three-year term.
Before the first local elections, which were held in February and
March 1981, the central government appointed local committee officials.
In late 1987, it was unclear whether the chairpersons of the local
revolutionary committees reported to the Office of the Council of
Ministers or to the Ministry of Interior.
Cambodia - THE MEDIA
In late 1987, the Kampuchean (or Khmer) People's Revolutionary Party
(KPRP) continued to be the ruling Marxist- Leninist party of the PRK. It is an offshoot of the Indochinese Communist Party
(ICP), which played a dominant role in Cambodian resistance against the
French and the Japanese. Some leaders of the anticolonial
Cambodian resistance, or Khmer Issarak, had been members of the ICP, and they had helped found the KPRP
in 1951. The party was formed after the decision by the ICP's Second
Party Congress in February 1951 to dissolve itself and to establish
three independent parties for Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos. On September
30, 1960, the KPRP party was renamed the Workers' Party of Kampuchea
(WPK). Pol Pot emerged as the key figure. In 1966 shortly after Pol Pot
returned from talks with Chinese leaders in Beijing, the party's name
was changed to the KCP.
The communist party in Cambodia has a history of bitter factional
feuds. After the Second Party Congress in 1960 and the disappearance of
party General Secretary Tou Samouth in 1962, the party split into
pro-Soviet and pro-Chinese factions. The dominant faction, led by Pol
Pot, adopted a position that was pro-Chinese and anti-Soviet. In January
1979, the split became irreversible as the pro-Vietnamese/pro-Soviet
faction under Pen Sovan replaced the Pol Pot faction as the de facto
ruler in Phnom Penh. The rival factions even disagreed on the founding
date of the communist party in Cambodia: the Pol Pot faction, under
Khieu Samphan, in late 1987, claimed September 30, 1960; however, the
other group, the mainstream KPRP under Heng Samrin, continued to honor
1951 as the founding year.
The Heng Samrin faction held the Third Party Congress of what would
later become the KPRP between January 5 and 8, 1979. Heng Samrin's
faction claimed that it alone was the legitimate descendant of the
communist party founded in 1951. Very little is known about the Third
Party Congress (also known as the Congress for Party Reconstruction)
except that Pen Sovan was elected first secretary of the Central
Committee and that the party then had between sixty-two and sixty-six
regular members.
Some key figures in the Pen Sovan leadership were former
collaborators with Pol Pot, but this information, and the communist
ideological convictions of the new leadership were not publicized
because the leadership feared backlash from people who had been
brutalized by the Pol Pot regime. Such concern was implicit in Pen
Sovan's political report to the Fourth Party Congress held from May 26
to May 29, 1981. In the report, he was careful to distance the KPRP from
Pol Pot's KCP, and he denounced the KCP as a traitor to the party and to
the nation.
The KPRP decided at the Fourth Party Congress to operate
"openly." This move seemed to reflect the leadership's growing
confidence in its ability to stay in power. The move may have had a
practical dimension as well because it involved the people more actively
in the regime's effort to build the country's political and
administrative infrastructure.
The Fourth Party Congress reviewed Pen Sovan's political report and
defined the party's strategy for the next several years. The Congress
adopted five "basic principles of the party line," which were
to uphold the banners of patriotism and of international proletarian
solidarity; to defend the country (the primary and sacred task of all
people); to restore and to develop the economy and the culture in the
course of gradual transition toward socialism; to strengthen military
solidarity with Vietnam, Laos, the Soviet Union, and other socialist
nations; and to develop "a firm Marxist-Leninist party." At
the Congress it was decided that henceforth the party would be known as
the KPRP, in order to distinguish it from "the reactionary Pol Pot
party and to underline and reassert the community of the party's best
traditions." The Fourth Party Congress also proclaimed its resolve
to stamp out the "reactionary ultra-nationalist doctrine of Pol
Pot," to emphasize a centralized government and collective
leadership, and to reject personality cults. The "ultra-nationalist
doctrine" issue was an allusion to Pol Pot's racist,
anti-Vietnamese stance. The Congress, attended by 162 delegates, elected
twenty-one members of the party Central Committee, who in turn elected
Pen Sovan as general secretary and the seven members of the party inner
circle to the Political Bureau. It also adopted a new statute for the
party, but did not release the text.
According to Michael Vickery, veterans of the independence struggle
of the 1946 to 1954 period dominated the party Central Committee. A
majority of the Central Committee members had spent all or part of the
years 1954 to 1970 in exile in Vietnam or in the performance of
"duties abroad."
The KPRP's pro-Vietnamese position did not change when Heng Samrin
suddenly replaced Pen Sovan as party leader on December 4, 1981. Pen
Sovan, who was reportedly flown to Hanoi under Vietnamese guard, was
"permitted to take a long rest," but observers believed that
he was purged for not being sufficiently pro-Vietnamese. In any case,
the new general secretary won Hanoi's endorsement by acknowledging
Vietnam's role as senior partner in the Cambodian- Vietnamese
relationship. The party recognized the change in leadership symbolically
by changing the official founding date of the KPRP from February 19,
1951, to June 28, 1951, in deference to the Vietnam Workers' Party (Dang
Lao Dong Viet Nam), which was established in March 1951.
In mid-1981, the KPRP was essentially a skeletal organization. It had
few party branches except for those in Phnom Penh, in Kampong Saom, and
in the eighteen provincial capitals. Party membership was estimated at
between 600 and 1,000, a considerable increase over 1979 but still only
a fraction of the number of cadres needed to run the party and the
government. In 1981 several of the 18 provinces had only 1 party member
each, and Kampong Cham, the largest province with a population of more
than 1 million, had only 30 regular members, according to Cambodia
specialist Ben Kiernan.
The party held its Fifth Party Congress from October 13 to October
16, 1985, to reflect on the previous five years and to chart a new
course for the next several years. The party's membership had increased
to 7,500 regulars (4,000 new members joined in 1985 alone). The party
had an additional pool of 37,000 "core" members from which it
could recruit tested party regulars. There were only 4,000 core members
in mid-1981. According to General Secretary Heng Samrin's political
report, the KPRP had twenty-two regional committees and an undisclosed
number of branches, circles, and cells in government agencies, armed
forces units, internal security organs, mass organizations, enterprises,
factories, and farms. The report expressed satisfaction with party
reconstruction since 1981, especially with the removal of the
"danger of authoritarianism" and the restoration of the
principles of democratic centralism and of collective leadership. It
pointed out "some weaknesses" that had to be overcome,
however. For example, the party was "still too thin and weak"
at the district and the grass-roots levels. Ideological work lagged and
lacked depth and consistency; party policies were implemented very
slowly, if at all, with few, if any, timely steps to rectify failings;
and party cadres, because of their propensities for narrow-mindedness,
arrogance, and bureaucratism, were unable to win popular trust and
support. Another major problem was the serious shortage of political
cadres (for party chapters), economic and managerial cadres, and
technical cadres. Still another problem that had to be addressed
"in the years to come" was the lack of a documented history of
the KPRP. Heng Samrin's political report stressed the importance of
party history for understanding "the good traditions of the
party."
The report to the Fifth Congress noted that Heng Samrin's
administration, in coordination with "Vietnamese volunteers,"
had destroyed "all types" of resistance guerrilla bases. The
report also struck a sobering note: the economy remained backward and
unbalanced, with its material and technical bases still below pre- war
levels, and the country's industries were languishing from lack of fuel,
spare parts, and raw materials. Transition toward socialism, the report
warned, would take "dozens of years."
To hasten the transition to socialism, the Fifth Congress unveiled
the PRK's First Plan, covering the years 1986 to 1990. The program included the addition of the
"private economy" to the three sectors of the economy
mentioned in the Constitution (the state sector, collective sector, and
the family sector). Including the private economy was necessary because
of the "very heavy and very complex task" that lay ahead in
order to transform the "nonsocialist components" of the
economy to an advanced stage. According to the political report
submitted to the congress, mass mobilization of the population was
considered crucial to the successful outcome of the First Plan. The
report also noted the need to cultivate "new socialist men" if
Cambodia were to succeed in its nation-building. These men were supposed
to be loyal to the fatherland and to socialism; to respect manual labor,
production, public property, and discipline; and to possess
"scientific knowledge."
Heng Samrin's political report also focused on foreign affairs. He
recommended that Phnom Penh strengthen its policy of alliance with
Vietnam, Laos, the Soviet Union, and other socialist countries. He
stressed--as Pen Sovan had in May 1981--that such an alliance was, in
effect, "a law" that guaranteed the success of the Cambodian
revolution. At the same time, he urged the congress and the Cambodian
people to spurn "narrow-minded chauvinism, every opportunistic
tendency, and every act and attitude infringing on the friendship"
between Cambodia and its Indochinese neighbors. (He was apparently
alluding to the continued Cambodian sensitivity to the presence of
Vietnamese troops and of about 60,000 Vietnamese settlers in Cambodia.
CGDK sources maintained that there were really about 700,000 Vietnamese
settlers in the country.)
The KPRP's three objectives for the period 1986 to 1990 were to
demonstrate military superiority "along the border and inside the
country" for complete elimination of all anti-PRK activities; to
develop political, military, and economic capabilities; and to
strengthen special relations with Vietnam as well as mutual cooperation
with other fraternal countries. Before Heng Samrin's closing address on
October 16, the 250 party delegates to the congress elected a new
Central Committee of 45 members (31 full members and 14 alternates). The
Central Committee in turn elected Heng Samrin as general secretary, a
new Political Bureau (nine full members and two alternates), a
five-member Secretariat, and seven members of the Central Committee
Control Commission.
After the Fifth Congress, the party's organizational work was
intensified substantially. The KPRP claimed that by the end of 1986 it
had more than 10,000 regular members and 40,000 candidate members who
were being groomed for regular status.
Cambodia - THE KUFNCD
The most intractable foreign policy question facing the rival
Cambodian regimes in the 1980s was that of how to establish an
independent, neutral, and nonaligned Cambodia under a set of terms
agreeable to all those, both at home and abroad, who were interested.
Despite differing perceptions of potential gains and losses, all parties
to the Cambodian dispute were striving for reconciliation. This was a
positive sign, especially because in 1979 and in 1980, no one, except
perhaps Sihanouk, believed that reconciliation was possible.
In the first two years of the Cambodian crisis, the rival Cambodian
regimes had different priorities. The Heng Samrin regime's overriding
concern was to consolidate its political and its territorial gains,
while relying on the Vietnamese to take the lead in foreign affairs and
in national security. The political price of this external dependence
was high because it contributed to Phnom Penh's image as a Vietnamese
puppet. Vietnam also paid a price for its assertion that it had
intervened only "at the invitation" of Heng Samrin "to
defend the gains of the revolution they have won...at a time when the
Beijing expansionists are colluding with the United States." Phnom
Penh and Hanoi also asserted speciously that political turmoil inside
Cambodia constituted a civil war and was, therefore, of no concern to
outsiders. Vietnam's attempts to shield the Cambodian crisis from
external scrutiny led its noncommunist neighbors to suspect that Hanoi
was finally moving to fulfill its historical ambition of dominating all
of Indochina.
Anti-Heng Samrin resistance groups pursued an opposite course. Their
strategy was to internationalize the Cambodian question--with political
support from China and from the ASEAN nations--as a case of unprovoked
Vietnamese aggression, in order to put pressure on Vietnam and to
undermine the legitimacy of the Heng Samrin administration. At the same
time, the resistance groups sought to destabilize the Heng Samrin regime
by challenging the Vietnamese occupation forces. The regime in Phnom
Penh, with support from Vietnam and from the Soviet Union, nevertheless
continued to consolidate its gains.
In 1981 the rival camps pressed on with their confrontational
tactics. The anti-Vietnamese resistance factions, despite their
long-standing, internal feuds, began to negotiate among themselves for
unity against their common enemy. On the diplomatic front, they worked
closely with ASEAN to convene the UN-sponsored International Conference
on Kampuchea, which took place from July 13 to July 17, 1981, in New
York. The conference, attended by representatives from seventy-nine
countries and by observers from fifteen countries, adopted a declaration
of principles for settling the Cambodian crisis. The central elements of
the declaration were those contained in the UN General Assembly
resolution of 1979 and in the proposals for Cambodian peace announced by
the ASEAN countries in October 1980. The declaration called for the
withdrawal of all foreign forces in the shortest possible time under the
supervision and the verification of a UN peacekeeping-observer group;
for arrangements to ensure that armed Cambodian factions would not
prevent or disrupt free elections; for measures to maintain law and
order during the interim before free elections could be held and a new
government established; for free elections under UN auspices; for the
continuation of Cambodia's status as a neutral and nonaligned state; and
for a declaration by the future elected government that Cambodia would
not pose a threat to other countries, especially to neighboring states.
The declaration also called on the five permanent members of the UN
Security Council (China, France, the Soviet Union, Britain, and the
United States) and on all other states to pledge to respect Cambodia's
independence, its territorial integrity, and its neutral status and to
declare that they would neither draw Cambodia into any military
alliance, nor introduce foreign troops into the country, nor establish
any military bases there. The declaration's principles were reaffirmed
in successive UN General Assembly resolutions, and they formed the basis
of the ASEAN-sponsored framework for resolving the Cambodian question in
the 1980s.
Since 1979 the ASEAN countries have played a significant role on
behalf of the Cambodian resistance factions. Individually and
collectively, through the annual conferences of their foreign ministers,
these countries consistently have stressed the importance of Vietnam's
withdrawal as a precondition for a comprehensive political settlement of
the Cambodian question. They have rejected all moves by Hanoi and Phnom
Penh that were aimed at legitimizing the Vietnamese occupation of
Cambodia and the Heng Samrin regime. Together with China, they also were
architects of the Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea.
Phnom Penh's principal foreign policy spokesman has been Vietnam, and
its major diplomatic moves have been coordinated by and proclaimed by
the annual conference of foreign ministers of the three Indochinese
states meeting consecutively in Hanoi (or Ho Chi Minh City), in Phnom
Penh, and in Vientiane. Hanoi's position on Cambodia has been that the
"so-called Kampuchean problem is but the consequence of Chinese
expansionism and hegemonism," that Vietnam's military presence in
Cambodia was defensive because it was meeting the Chinese threat to
Cambodia and to Vietnam, and that Hanoi would withdraw from Cambodia
when the Chinese threat no longer existed.
Thailand's stance on the Cambodian issue has been of particular
concern to Phnom Penh and to Hanoi. ASEAN initially maintained the
position that Thailand was not a party to the Cambodian conflict but an
"affected bystander" entitled to adopt a policy of neutrality.
Hanoi and Phnom Penh denounced that posture as "sham
neutrality" and accused Thailand of colluding with China; they
alleged that Thailand allowed shipment of Chinese arms through its
territory to the "remnants of [the] Pol Pot-Ieng Sary clique,"
which was operating inside the Thai border. They also claimed that
Bangkok sheltered and armed Pol Pot's guerrillas and other Cambodian
"reactionaries."
Nevertheless, the Heng Samrin regime made friendly overtures to
Bangkok. In June 1980, for example, it proposed a meeting to discuss
resuming "normal relations" and turning their common border
into "a border of friendship and peace." The Heng Samrin
regime stated that its primary concern was the elimination of "all
hostile acts" between the two countries and that it was willing to
forget the past and "all the provocations launched by Thailand
against Cambodia." Thailand replied that talks with the Heng Samrin
regime would solve nothing. Besides, Thai officials said, such talks
would lend an inappropriate appearance of recognition to the Phnom Penh
regime. They also stressed that Vietnam had to withdraw from Cambodia
before constructive talks could take place.
In July 1980, the three Indochinese states proposed the signing of
multilateral or bilateral treaties of peaceful coexistence,
nonaggression, and noninterference among themselves and Thailand. They
added that the treaties should also be signed by "other Southeast
Asian countries." The proposal also called for the creation of a
Southeast Asian zone of peace and stability and for a demilitarized
border zone between Cambodia and Thailand. Bangkok, however, viewed the
proposal as an attempt to divert international attention from the
fundamental question of Vietnamese occupation and as a gambit to get
indirect or "back-door" recognition for the Heng Samrin
regime.
The Indochinese states sought to open a dialogue with the ASEAN
countries in 1981 by proposing a regional conference, which was to be
attended also by observers such as the UN secretary general and by
representatives from several countries. The proposal was Hanoi's way of
internationalizing the Cambodian issue: Vietnam would be able to link
its role in Cambodia to the roles of Thailand and of China in aiding the
anti-Vietnamese resistance groups. To highlight the linkage, Hanoi made
two suggestions: first, the regional conference could address "the
Cambodian question" if the Thai and Chinese connections also were
discussed; and second, Vietnam would immediately withdraw some of its
troops if and when Thailand stopped aiding the resistance groups and if
the UN withdrew its recognition of Democratic Kampuchea.
In July 1982, Hanoi, aware that no one was taking it seriously,
departed from its previous position. It announced that it had gone ahead
with a partial withdrawal and now demanded only that Thailand promise to
stop aiding Khmer insurgents. At that time, the Indochinese foreign
ministers revealed that "in the immediate future," the PRK
would not plan to reclaim the Cambodian seat at the United Nations if
the Pol Pot clique were expelled from that organization. The Thai
government dismissed Hanoi's statement as a rhetorical concession
designed only to mislead the world and characterized the partial
withdrawal as nothing more than a disguised troop rotation.
At the first Indochinese summit held on February 22 and February 23,
1983, in Vientiane, the participants declared that all Vietnamese
"volunteers" would be withdrawn when external threats to
Cambodia no longer existed, but that Hanoi, would reassess its option to
return to Cambodia if a new threat emerged after it had withdrawn from
the country.
Hanoi contended that its partial withdrawal was a positive first step
toward eventual restoration of peace in Cambodia, but some observers
felt that the real reason for the withdrawal was Hanoi's realization
that a deadlock over the Cambodian issue would create too much of a
drain on its limited resources. Another likely reason for the withdrawal
was the growing Cambodian irritation with the movement of Vietnamese
nationals into Cambodia's fertile lands around the Tonle Sap. This population migration was a potential
source of renewed ethnic conflict.
In July 1983, the Indochinese foreign ministers denied "the
slanderous allegation of China, the United States, and a number of
reactionary circles within the ASEAN countries" that Vietnam was
aiding and abetting Vietnamese emigration to Cambodia. (Khmer Rouge
sources claimed that as of 1987, between 600,000 and 700,000 Vietnamese
immigrants were in Cambodia; the Heng Samrin regime put the number at
about 60,000.)
In September 1983, ASEAN foreign ministers issued a joint
"Appeal for Kampuchean Independence," proposing a phased
Vietnamese withdrawal, coupled with an international peacekeeping force
and with assistance in rebuilding areas vacated by the Vietnamese. Hanoi
rejected the appeal, however, seeking instead a position of strength
from which it could dictate terms for a settlement. Vietnam launched a
major dry-season offensive in 1984 in an attempt to crush all resistance
forces permanently. The offensive destroyed most, if not all, resistance
bases.
In January 1985, the Indochinese foreign ministers claimed that the
Cambodian situation was unfolding to their advantage and that the
Cambodian question would be settled in five to ten years with or without
negotiations. At that time, PRK Prime Minister Hun Sen revealed Phnom
Penh's readiness to hold peace talks with Sihanouk and with Son Sann,
but only if they agreed to dissociate themselves from Pol Pot. On March
12, Hun Sen proposed a dialogue with rival factions under a six-point
plan. The proposal called for the removal of the Pol Pot clique from all
political and military activities; for a complete Vietnamese withdrawal;
for national reconciliation and for free elections under UN supervision;
for peaceful coexistence in Southeast Asia; for cessation of external
interference in Cambodian affairs; and for the establishment of an
international supervisory and control commission to oversee the
implementation of agreements. Shortly afterward, Hanoi stressed that the
question of foreign military bases in Cambodia was an issue that could
be negotiated only between Vietnam and Cambodia. Hanoi also signaled
that the Khmer Rouge regime could participate in the process of
Cambodian self-determination only if it disarmed itself and broke away
from the Pol Pot clique.
Cambodia - From "Proximity Talks" to a "Cocktail Party"
The conciliatory gestures of Hanoi and of Phnom Penh were part of a
spate of proposals and counterproposals made in 1985. On April 9,
Malaysia suggested "proximity," or indirect, talks between the
CGDK and the Heng Samrin regime. Vietnam, the PRK, and the Soviet Union
reacted favorably. Sihanouk voiced "personal" support for
indirect negotiations. He was, however, uncertain whether his CGDK
partners and unnamed foreign powers would go along with the Malaysian
proposal because such talks, indirect as they might be, not only would
imply de facto recognition of the Phnom Penh regime but also would
obscure the question of Vietnamese occupation. ASEAN's deputy foreign
ministers met in Bangkok in May, nevertheless; they endorsed the
Malaysian plan and referred the matter to CGDK's representatives in
Bangkok. At the time of the ASEAN meeting, Sihanouk released a
memorandum that called for unconditional peace talks among all Cambodian
factions and for the formation of a reconciliation government comprising
both the CGDK and the Heng Samrin regime.
During the ensuing diplomatic exchanges, the Malaysian plan was
discarded. The ASEAN foreign ministers, who met in Kuala Lumpur from
July 8 to July 9, 1985, adopted a Thai compromise proposal that called
for "a form of indirect or proximity talks" between the CGDK
and Vietnam. The proposal noted that the Heng Samrin regime could attend
the talks only as part of the Vietnamese delegation. The CGDK, China,
and the United States backed the Thai proposal, but Phnom Penh and Hanoi
rejected it as a scheme to restore the Pol Pot faction to power.
In yet another attempt to break the Cambodian impasse, Indonesia
offered in November 1985 to host an informal "cocktail party"
for all warring Cambodian factions. (At that time Indonesia served as
ASEAN's official "interlocutor" with Vietnam.) Indonesia
apparently had concluded that such an informal gathering was timely in
view of two recent developments: the Khmer Rouge announcement in July
that it would acquiesce, if necessary, to being excluded from a future
Cambodian coalition government; and Hanoi's disclosure in August that it
would complete its withdrawal from Cambodia by 1990 (five years sooner
than had been indicated in its April 1985 announcement), even in the
absence of a political settlement on the Cambodian issue at that time.
Another notable development was the Khmer Rouge disclosure in September
that Pol Pot had stepped down from his post as commander in chief of the
armed forces to take up a lesser military post. On December 30, Khieu
Samphan stated that Pol Pot's political-military role would cease
permanently upon Hanoi's consenting to complete its withdrawal by the
end of 1990. Hanoi, in an apparent departure from its previous stand,
pledged that its pullout would be completed as soon as the Khmer Rouge
forces disarmed.
In 1986 the Cambodian stalemate continued amid further recriminations
and new conciliatory gestures. On March 17, the CGDK issued an
eight-point peace plan that included the Heng Samrin regime in a
projected four-party Cambodian government. The plan called for a
two-phase Vietnamese withdrawal; for a cease-fire to allow an orderly
withdrawal--both the cease-fire and the withdrawal to be supervised by a
UN observer group, for the initiation of negotiations, following the
first phase of the withdrawal, and for the formation of an interim
four-party coalition government with Sihanouk as president and Son Sann
as prime minister. According to the plan, the coalition government would
then hold free elections under UN supervision to set up a liberal,
democratic, and nonaligned Cambodia, the neutrality of which would be
guaranteed by the UN for the first two or three years. The new Cambodia
would welcome aid from all countries for economic reconstruction and
would sign a nonaggression and peaceful coexistence treaty with Vietnam.
Hanoi and Phnom Penh denounced the plan and labeled it as a vain attempt
by China to counter the PRK's "rapid advance." Sihanouk shared
some of the misgivings about the plan, fearing that, without sufficient
safeguards, the Khmer Rouge would dominate the quadripartite government
that emerged. Perhaps to allay such misgivings, China signaled the
possibility of ending its aid to the Khmer Rouge if Vietnam withdrew
from Cambodia.
In late October 1986, Hanoi, through an Austrian intermediary,
suggested two-stage peace negotiations to Sihanouk. In the first stage,
there were to be preliminary talks in Vienna among all Cambodian
parties, including the Khmer Rouge (Pol Pot, however, was to be
excluded). The second phase was to be an international conference that
included the contending Cambodian factions, as well as Vietnam, and
other interested countries. Sihanouk responded with a counterproposal
that called for his meeting with a top-level Vietnamese leader. This
meeting was to be followed by an all- Cambodian session and then by an
international conference. According to unconfirmed reports, Pol Pot, now
gravely ill, had been transferred to Beijing shortly after Hanoi's offer
to Sihanouk. If these reports were true, Pol Pot's role within the Khmer
Rouge camp may have ended with his illness.
A new phase in the Cambodian peace strategies began in 1987. At the
beginning of the year Hanoi renewed its October bid to Sihanouk. Hanoi
appeared eager to seek a way out of the Cambodian imbroglio, but
continued to argue that Vietnam had "security interests" in
Cambodia and that China was the main threat to Southeast Asia. It also
was evident that Hanoi was attempting to split ASEAN's consensus on
Cambodia by claiming that Indonesia and Malaysia had a correct view of
the Chinese threat while rejecting the view of Thailand and Singapore
that Vietnam was ASEAN's principal nemesis in the region.
In addition, as Soviet interest in Cambodia grew, there was
speculation among observers that Moscow might involve itself in the
quest for a negotiated settlement. A visit to Phnom Penh in March 1987
by Soviet foreign minister Eduard Shevardnadze signaled a departure from
Moscow's long-standing position that it was only "a third
party" to the Cambodian conflict. It also constituted tacit
acknowledgment that the Soviet Union had been supporting--at least
indirectly--Vietnam's presence in Cambodia through economic and military
aid, which totaled the equivalent of US$2 billion per year.
The Heng Samrin regime became more assertive in articulating its
policy options than it had been before. It became known in early April
that Hun Sen had sent word to Sihanouk suggesting a meeting in Canberra,
or Paris, or Stockholm at the prince's convenience. (It was Hun Sen's
second effort to initiate such a dialogue. In 1984 he had proposed a
similar meeting, but Sihanouk had declined because of objections by
China and by his CGDK partners.)
Sihanouk's one-year leave of absence from the CGDK, effective May 7,
1987, was a good sign for Cambodia because he could now freely explore
possibilities for a settlement without squabbling with his coalition
partners. On June 23, Sihanouk agreed to see Hun Sen in Pyongyang, but
two days later, hours after Chinese acting premier Wan Li had met with
Sihanouk's wife, Princess Monique, Sihanouk abruptly canceled the
meeting. China apparently objected to any negotiations as long as
Vietnam kept troops in Cambodia. Sihanouk said in July that he preferred
to talk first with a Vietnamese leader because the Cambodian conflict
was between the Khmer and the Vietnamese and not among the Cambodian
factions. He said that he would not mind meeting with Hun Sen, however,
as long as the initiative for such a meeting came from Hun Sen or his
regime and not from Hanoi.
Events occurred rapidly in the summer of 1987. In June UN secretary
general Javier Perez de Cuellar issued a compromise plan that called for
a phased Vietnamese withdrawal; for national reconciliation leading to
the formation of a new coalition government with Sihanouk as president;
for a complete Vietnamese pullout and for free elections; and for
special provisions to deal with the armed Cambodian factions. On July 1,
while ostensibly on vacation in the Soviet Union, Hun Sen had talks with
Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze. The two agreed that "the
realities which prevail in the region" must not be ignored in any
plan for Cambodian settlement. On July 25, the Khmer Rouge faction
publicly disavowed any intention to return to power at the expense of
other factions and stated that to do so would jeopardize its national
union policy and would alienate "friends in the world."
Hanoi, meanwhile, continued to put off discussions about its presence
in Cambodia, thereby forcing the resistance to deal directly with the
Heng Samrin regime. Between July 27 and July 29, Vietnam's foreign
minister, Nguyen Co Thach, conferred with his Indonesian counterpart in
Ho Chi Minh City and called for "an informal meeting" or
cocktail party of all Cambodian factions without any preconditions. The
cocktail party, to be held in Jakarta, was to be followed by a
conference of all concerned countries, including Vietnam. On July 30,
Heng Samrin journeyed to Moscow to consult with Soviet leader Mikhail S.
Gorbachev. Then in an interview published in the Italian Communist Party
daily L'Unita on August 12, Hun Sen sought to exonerate the
Soviet Union from blame for Cambodia's plight and instead blamed China
for the country's difficulties. Referring to the proposed meeting with
Sihanouk, Hun Sen insinuated that Sihanouk had "bosses" who
would not let him engage freely in a dialogue. On August 13, the
Indochinese governments endorsed "the Ho Chi Minh formula"
(Hanoi's term for Indonesia's original cocktail party idea) as a
significant "breakthrough" toward a peaceful settlement in
Cambodia.
The ASEAN foreign ministers met informally on August 16 to discuss
the cocktail party idea, and they forged a compromise that papered over
some of the differences among the six member states concerning the
Cambodia situation. Even this attempt to achieve unanimity proved
fruitless, however, as Hanoi rejected the ASEAN suggestion.
Cambodia - The Sihanouk-Hun Sen Meeting
Hun Sen's April 1987 proposal for a talk with Sihanouk was
resurrected in August when the prince sent a message to Hun Sen through
the Palestine Liberation Organization's ambassador in Pyongyang.
Sihanouk was hopeful that his encounter with Hun Sen would lead to
another UN-sponsored Geneva conference on Indochina, which, he believed,
would assure a political settlement that would allow Vietnam and the
Soviet Union to save face. Such a conference, Sihanouk maintained,
should include the UN secretary general, representatives of the five
permanent members of the UN Security Council, Laos, Vietnam, and the
four Cambodian factions. He also suggested the inclusion of ASEAN
countries, members of the defunct International Control Commission
(India, Canada, and Poland), and other concerned parties.
The Heng Samrin regime had apparently envisioned a meeting between
Sihanouk and Hun Sen when it announced on August 27 a "policy on
national reconciliation." While artfully avoiding the mention of
Vietnam, the policy statement called for talks with the three resistance
leaders but not with "Pol Pot and his close associates." An
appeal to overseas Cambodians to support Phnom Penh's economic and
national defense efforts and assurances that Cambodians who had served
the insurgent factions would be welcomed home and would be assisted in
resuming a normal life and in participating in the political process
were key features of the policy. The regime also expressed for the first
time its readiness to negotiate the issue of Cambodian refugees in
Thailand. The offer to negotiate undercut the resistance factions,
which, Phnom Penh contended, were exploiting displaced Cambodians by
using them against the Heng Samrin regime for military and political
purposes.
Resistance leaders questioned Phnom Penh's sincerity in promulgating
its policy of reconciliation and were uncertain how to respond. At their
annual consultation in Beijing, they and their Chinese hosts predictably
called for a Vietnamese pullout as a precondition to a negotiated
settlement. Sihanouk, however, launching a gambit of his own through
Cambodian emigres in Paris, called for reconciliation �migr�s among
all Khmer factions. The initiative met with a favorable, but qualified,
response from PRK Prime Minister Hun Sen and, in early October, the
Phnom Penh government unveiled its own five-point plan for a political
settlement. The PRK proposals envisioned peace talks between the rival
Cambodian camps and "a high position [for Sihanouk] in the leading
state organ" of the PRK, Vietnamese withdrawal in conjunction with
the cutoff of outside aid to the resistance, general elections
(organized by the Heng Samrin regime) held after the Vietnamese
withdrawal, and the formation of a new four-party coalition. The October
8 plan also proposed negotiations with Thailand for the creation of a
zone of peace and friendship along the Cambodian-Thai border, for
discussions on an "orderly repatriation" of Cambodian refugees
from Thailand, and for the convening of an international conference. The
conference was to be attended by the rival Cambodian camps, the
Indochinese states, the ASEAN states, the Soviet Union, China, India,
France, Britain, the United States, and other interested countries. The
CGDK, however, rejected the plan as an attempt to control the dynamics
of national reconciliation while Cambodia was still occupied by Vietnam.
Sihanouk and the PRK continued their exploratory moves. On October
19, Hun Sen agreed to meet with Sihanouk, even though Sihanouk had
cancelled similar meetings scheduled for late 1984 and for June 1987. At
the end of October, Hun Sen flew to Moscow for diplomatic coordination.
The CGDK announced on October 31 that a "clarification on national
reconciliation policy" had been signed by all three resistance
leaders. It was likely that the two main goals of the clarification,
which was dated October 1, were to restate the CGDK's position on peace
talks and to underline the unity among the resistance leaders. The
statement said that "the first phase" of Vietnamese withdrawal
must be completed before a four-party coalition government could be set
up, not within the framework of the PRK but under the premises of a
"neutral and noncommunist" Cambodia.
Sihanouk was clearly in the spotlight at this point. It was possible
that his personal diplomacy would stir suspicion among his coalition
partners, as well as among Chinese and ASEAN leaders. It was also
possible that he might strike a deal with Phnom Penh and Hanoi and
exclude the Khmer Rouge faction and its patron, China. Mindful of such
potential misgivings, Sihanouk went to great lengths to clarify his own
stand. He said that he would not accept any "high position" in
the illegal PRK regime, that he would disclose fully the minutes of his
talks with Hun Sen, and that he would not waver from his commitment to a
"neutral and noncommunist" Cambodia free of Vietnamese troops.
Sihanouk and Hun Sen met at F�re-en-Tardenois, a village northeast
of Paris, from December 2 to December 4, 1987. The communiqu� they
issued at the end of their talks mentioned their agreement to work for a
political solution to the nine-year-old conflict and to call for an
international conference. The conference, to be convened only after all
Cambodian factions reached an agreement on a coalition arrangement,
would support the new coalition accord and would guarantee the country's
independence, neutrality, and nonalignment. The two leaders also agreed
to meet again at F�re-en-Tardenois in January 1988 and in Pyongyang at
a later date. The communiqu� ended with a plea to the other Cambodian
parties--Sihanouk's coalition partners--to join the next rounds of
talks.
The communiqu� offered no practical solution. In fact, it did not
mention Vietnam, despite Sihanouk's demand that the communiqu� include
a clause on Vietnamese withdrawal. At a December 4 press conference, Hun
Sen disclosed an understanding with Sihanouk that "concrete
questions" would be discussed at later meetings. Included in the
concrete questions were "the withdrawal of Vietnamese troops,
Cambodia's future government, and Norodom Sihanouk's position." Hun
Sen also revealed that during the meeting Sihanouk had told him that
"the future political regime of Cambodia" should be a
French-style democracy with a multiparty system and free radio and
television. In an official commentary the following day, Hanoi was
deliberately vague on Hun Sen's concrete questions, which, it said,
would be dealt with "at the next meetings."
In foreign capitals, there were mixed reactions to what Hun Sen
called the "historic meeting." Officials in Phnom Penh, Hanoi,
Vientiane, and Moscow were enthusiastic. Thai officials, however, were
cautious, if not disappointed, and they stressed the need for Vietnamese
withdrawal and for Thailand's participation in peace talks with the
Cambodians. Kuala Lumpur and Jakarta both welcomed the unofficial, or
indirect, talks as a promising start toward a political solution. They
agreed with Bangkok on the necessity of Vietnamese withdrawal. Officials
in Pyongyang said the meeting was "a good thing," but declined
to accept the suggestion of Hun Sen and Sihanouk that they mediate
between China and the Soviet Union on the Cambodian issue. China
stressed that it supported Sihanouk's efforts to seek "a fair and
reasonable political settlement of the Kampuchean question." Such a
settlement was said to be possible only when Vietnam withdrew all its
troops from Cambodia.
On December 10, Sihanouk abruptly announced the cancellation of the
second meeting with Hun Sen. He said that such a meeting would be
useless because Son Sann and Khieu Samphan refused to participate in it
and because they also refused to support the joint communiqu�. He added
that--out of fear that the governments in Phnom Penh, Hanoi, and Moscow
might realize an unwarranted propaganda advantage from the meeting--he
would not meet Hun Sen. But on December 15, Sihanouk announced abruptly
that he would resume talks with Hun Sen because ASEAN members saw the
cancellation as "a new complication" in their efforts to
pressure the Vietnamese into leaving Cambodia. By December 20, Sihanouk
and Hun Sen had agreed to resume talks on January 27, 1988. On December
21, Son Sann expressed his readiness to join the talks in a personal
capacity, provided that Vietnam agreed to attend the talks or, if this
was not possible, provided that Vietnam informed the UN secretary
general and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council of its
plan to vacate Cambodia as quickly as possible after all Cambodian
factions had embarked on the process of internal reconciliation.
As 1987 drew to a close, talking and fighting continued amid hopes
and uncertainties about the future of Cambodia. It was equally clear
that progress toward a political settlement hinged chiefly on the
credibility of Vietnam's announced intention to withdraw from Cambodia
by 1990 and that this withdrawal alone was insufficient to guarantee a
peaceful solution to Cambodia's problems. At least three more critical
issues were at stake: an equitable power-sharing arrangement among these
four warring factions, an agreement among the factions to disarm in
order to ensure that civil war would not recur, and an effective
international guarantee of supervision for the implementation of any
agreements reached by the Cambodian factions. Still another critical
question was whether or not an eventual political settlement was
sufficient to assure a new Cambodia that was neutral, nonaligned, and
noncommunist.
Source: U.S. Library of Congress