|
|
|
|
The Scotsman
The former Socialist had always supported green causes and they were hopeful he would be the man to give environmental concerns the attention they deserved. Now, however, in the light of new figures that show deforestation in the Amazon increasing for the third consecutive year, the greens are seeing red. "Lula has been dazzled by power," said Fernando Gabeira, a former Green Party legislator who joined Da Silva's Workers� Party before the election but resigned last year because, he said: "Lula was talking like someone who wants development at all costs. "He cheated us in that he gave us the impression that we were allies and today he is much more allied with our adversaries. But then again he cheated many sectors. He got into government and changed positions." Presidential candidates who say one thing on the campaign trail and another when they get into power are nothing new. But there were many reasons to believe Da Silva was different. A former shoeshine boy and union leader who won a landslide victory by promising to make Brazil a kinder and fairer nation, he was elected in large part because of his personal and political integrity. Now, though, with the economy stagnant, unemployment high and corruption scandals forcing the government to spend more time defending itself than tackling problems, Brazilians are starting to question both his credibility and competence. They claim he has caved into big business interests, in particular soya and beef farmers. Prime among them are his disgruntled former allies in the green lobby. According to Gabeira, Da Silva has wavered on a number of issues, including genetically modified foods, the importation of used car tyres and the possibility of opening a third nuclear reactor outside Rio de Janeiro. Last week's announcement that annual deforestation grew 2% to 9,169 square miles - an area equal to the size of Israel and the second highest annual total since officials started keeping tabs on the destruction in 1988 - confirmed environmentalists� fears. Activists condemned Da Silva for not doing enough to prevent the rise. Government officials said they were unhappy with the figures, but claimed they were delighted at having stemmed a tide that had seen the deforestation grow 40% the year before. "That 9,169 square miles disappeared last year is unacceptable," said Adriana Ramos, the public policy coordinator with green NGO Instituto Socio Ambiental. "What is extremely worrying is that it has levelled out at a rate so much higher than it was a decade previously." As in previous years, most of the destruction came along the �Arch of Deforestation�, a swathe of land on the southern and eastern borders of the forest that is home to many of Brazil's soya producers and cattle ranchers. Brazil is the world's second biggest soya producer and has the second biggest herd of cattle. Both sectors are growing rapidly. Together they are greedily gobbling up forest, and Da Silva, critics say, is turning a blind eye because the foreign currency they bring is vital to keeping the economy afloat. One of the biggest criticisms has been his failure to spend money set aside for the Amazon Regional Protected Areas program, a World Bank-sponsored scheme that seeks to triple the amount of rainforest under protection by 2012 - and act as a buffer to more development. The Da Silva government has named no new protected areas over the past year even though officials said the money to do so was available. Read the full article at The Scotsman 24,000 square km of Amazon rainforest were destroyed in 2003 Recent increases in Amazon deforestation largely result from Brazil's growth as a beef exporter CONTENT COPYRIGHT the Scotsman. THIS CONTENT IS INTENDED SOLELY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. |
|
Consequences of Deforestation |
Local Climate Regulation Loss of Species, Disease Climactic Role Extinction |
| what's new | tropical fish | help support the site | guestbook | search | about | contact |
Copyright Rhett Butler 1994-2004 |
